3 datasets found
  1. Z

    Data from: Tesla Deaths

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • tesladeaths.com
    • +5more
    Updated Mar 10, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    @elonbachman; @icapulet (2025). Tesla Deaths [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_3378951
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 10, 2025
    Authors
    @elonbachman; @icapulet
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Tesla Deaths is a record of Tesla accidents that involved a driver, occupant, cyclist, motorcyclist, or pedestrian death. We record information about Tesla fatalities that have been reported and as much related crash data as possible such as location of crash, names of deceased. This dataset also tallies claimed and confirmed Tesla autopilot crashes, that is instances when Autopilot was activated during a Tesla crash that resulted in death.

    Latest version of dataset at https://www.tesladeaths.com.

  2. T

    Tesla Fire

    • tesla-fire.com
    • search.dataone.org
    • +2more
    csv
    Updated Feb 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    I Capulet (2024). Tesla Fire [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5520568
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    TSLAQ
    Authors
    I Capulet
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Apr 2, 2013 - Present
    Variables measured
    fires
    Description

    A digital record of all Tesla fires - including cars and other products, e.g. Tesla MegaPacks - that are corroborated by news articles or confirmed primary sources. Latest version hosted at https://www.tesla-fire.com.

  3. U

    Development and evaluation of vehicle to pedestrian [V2P] safety...

    • dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu
    pdf
    Updated Nov 20, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mary Cummings; Mary Cummings; Lixiao Huang; Lixiao Huang; Michael Clamann; Michael Clamann; Songpo Li; Songpo Li (2023). Development and evaluation of vehicle to pedestrian [V2P] safety interventions [R7] [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15139/S3/JU7U1Z
    Explore at:
    pdf(417853), pdf(940256), pdf(1402772)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 20, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    UNC Dataverse
    Authors
    Mary Cummings; Mary Cummings; Lixiao Huang; Lixiao Huang; Michael Clamann; Michael Clamann; Songpo Li; Songpo Li
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Globally, pedestrian deaths account for almost a quarter of all traffic related deaths and are also increasing (World Health Organization, 2018). In the US, pedestrian fatalities now account for approximately 16% of all motor vehicle crash-related deaths (Retting, 2018), with an 81% increase in injuries to distracted pedestrians since 2005 (Nasar & Troye, 2013). These increasing injury and fatality rates are concerning given that cars, in theory, have more safety devices on them today than ever before. Moreover, with increasing worldwide focus on autonomous self-driving vehicles, it is not clear that such advanced technology can account for vulnerable users such as pedestrians. It is also not clear how much pedestrian risk will be increased with the arrival of more automated vehicles and what could be done to mitigate such risks when these cars are more commonplace. This research effort, the first to conduct a controlled experiment of crossing pedestrians in a field setting with smartphone-based alerts, demonstrated that in a group of 30 participants given smartphone aural and visual alerts of varying reliability while engaging in distracted walking, only 2% exhibited a tendency towards unsafe crossings, while 18% tended towards risky crossings. These results parallel similar observational studies. Non-US-born participants, representing half the test population, were statistically more likely to engage in risky crossing behavior despite developing accurate trust models of the alert reliability. This was particularly true for non-US-born participants with higher than average neuroticism personality scores. These results suggest national origin plays an important role in the use of technological interventions meant to promote positive behaviors and solutions effective in one setting may not generalize to other nations. Moreover, technology-focused interventions are currently not producing effective solutions, especially across different nationalities. While the subject pool was small in this study and more research is needed in a larger population, this research suggests design criteria might be elucidated from such use of machine learning classification methods in concert with controlled experiments. In this experiment, whether people stopped at or before approximately two feet from the road’s edge predicted safer crossings. Such a threshold could be critical for the designers of autonomous cars who need to prioritize the tracking of multiple entities in congested environments. Those pedestrians that move, for example, inside two feet with constant or increasing velocity or acceleration can become high priority entities to track. More research is needed to determine such thresholds, including variations due to nationality, road and sidewalk design, and proximity to particularly vulnerable populations, i.e., high school and college campuses with higher numbers of people like to engage in distracted walking. However, given that cars like those from Tesla and Waymo already collect this information at levels researchers never could, allowing non-partisan researchers to access this data and develop safety-based models to be shared across all manufacturers would help prevent future fatalities.

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
@elonbachman; @icapulet (2025). Tesla Deaths [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_3378951

Data from: Tesla Deaths

Related Article
Explore at:
Dataset updated
Mar 10, 2025
Authors
@elonbachman; @icapulet
License

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Tesla Deaths is a record of Tesla accidents that involved a driver, occupant, cyclist, motorcyclist, or pedestrian death. We record information about Tesla fatalities that have been reported and as much related crash data as possible such as location of crash, names of deceased. This dataset also tallies claimed and confirmed Tesla autopilot crashes, that is instances when Autopilot was activated during a Tesla crash that resulted in death.

Latest version of dataset at https://www.tesladeaths.com.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu