This is the Dataset Collected by Shahed Univeristy Released in IEEE.

the Columns are: Fz, Cz, Pz, C3, T3, C4, T4, Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, F7, F8, P3, P4, T5, T6, O1, O2, Class, ID

the first 19 are channel names.

Class: ADHD/Control

ID: Patient ID

Participants were 61 children with ADHD and 60 healthy controls (boys and girls, ages 7-12). The ADHD children were diagnosed by an experienced psychiatrist to DSM-IV criteria, and have taken Ritalin for up to 6 months. None of the children in the control group had a history of psychiatric disorders, epilepsy, or any report of high-risk behaviors.

EEG recording was performed based on 10-20 standard by 19 channels (Fz, Cz, Pz, C3, T3, C4, T4, Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, F7, F8, P3, P4, T5, T6, O1, O2) at 128 Hz sampling frequency. The A1 and A2 electrodes were the references located on earlobes.

Since one of the deficits in ADHD children is visual attention, the EEG recording protocol was based on visual attention tasks. In the task, a set of pictures of cartoon characters was shown to the children and they were asked to count the characters. The number of characters in each image was randomly selected between 5 and 16, and the size of the pictures was large enough to be easily visible and countable by children. To have a continuous stimulus during the signal recording, each image was displayed immediately and uninterrupted after the child’s response. Thus, the duration of EEG recording throughout this cognitive visual task was dependent on the child’s performance (i.e. response speed).

Citation Author(s): Ali Motie Nasrabadi Armin Allahverdy Mehdi Samavati Mohammad Reza Mohammadi

DOI: 10.21227/rzfh-zn36

License: Creative Commons Attribution

These files contain the raw data and processing parameters to go with the paper "Hierarchical structure guides rapid linguistic predictions during naturalistic listening" by Jonathan R. Brennan and John T. Hale. These files include the stimulus (wav files), raw data (matlab format for the Fieldtrip toolbox), data processing paramters (matlab), and variables used to align the stimuli with the EEG data and for the statistical analyses reported in the paper.

Summary:

This dataset contains electroencephalographic recordings of subjects in a simple resting-state eyes open/closed experimental protocol. Data were recorded during a pilot experiment taking place in the GIPSA-lab, Grenoble, France, in 2017 [1]. Python code is available at https://github.com/plcrodrigues/Alpha-Waves-Dataset for manipulating the data.

Principal Investigators: Eng. Grégoire CATTAN, Eng. Pedro L. C. RODRIGUES
Scientific Supervisor: Dr. Marco Congedo

Introduction :

The occipital dominant rhythm (commonly referred to as occipital ‘Alpha’) is prominent in occipital and parietal regions when a subject is exempt of visual stimulations, as in the case when keeping the eyes closed (2). In normal subjects its peak frequency is in the range 8-12Hz. The detection of alpha waves on the ongoing electroencephalography (EEG) is a useful indicator of the subject’s level of stress, concentration, relaxation or mental load (3,4) and an easy marker to detect in the recorded signals because of its high signal-to-noise-ratio. This experiment was conducted to provide a simple yet reliable set of EEG signals carrying very distinct signatures on each experimental condition. It can be useful for researchers and students looking for an EEG dataset to perform tests with signal processing and machine learning algorithms. An example of application of this dataset can be seen in (5).

I.Participants

A total of 20 volunteers participated in the experiment (7 females), with mean (sd) age 25.8 (5.27) and median 25.5. 18 subjects were between 19 and 28 years old. Two participants with age 33 and 44 were outside this range.

II.Procedures

EEG signals were acquired using a standard research grade amplifier (g.USBamp, g.tec, Schiedlberg, Austria) and the EC20 cap equipped with 16 wet electrodes (EasyCap, Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany), placed according to the 10-20 international system. The locations of the electrodes were FP1, FP2, FC5, FC6, FZ, T7, CZ, T8, P7, P3, PZ, P4, P8, O1, Oz, and O2. The reference was placed on the right earlobe and the ground at the AFZ scalp location. The amplifier was linked by USB connection to the PC where the data were acquired by means of the software OpenVibe (6,7). We acquired the data with no digital filter and a sampling frequency of 512 samples per second was used. For ensuing analyses, the experimenter was able to tag the EEG signal using an in-house application based on a C/C++ library (8). The tag were sent by the application to the amplifier through the USB port of the PC. It was then recorded along with the EEG signal as a supplementary channel.

For each recording we provide the age, genre and fatigue of each participant. Fatigue was evaluated by the subjects thanks to a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 represents exhaustion. Each participant underwent one session consisting of ten blocks of ten seconds of EEG data recording. Five blocks were recorded while a subject was keeping his eyes closed (condition 1) and the others while his eyes were open (condition 2). The two conditions were alternated. Before the onset of each block, the subject was asked to close or open his eyes according to the experimental condition. The experimenter then tagged the EEG signal using the in-house application and started a 10-second countdown of a block.

III.Organization of the dataset

For each subject we provide a single .mat file containing the complete recording of the session. The file is a 2D-matrix where the rows contain the observations at each time sample. Columns 2 to 17 contain the recordings on each of the 16 EEG electrodes. The first column of the matrix represents the timestamp of each observation and column 18 and 19 contain the triggers for the experimental condition 1 and 2. The rows in column 18 (resp. 19) are filled with zeros, except at the timestamp corresponding to the beginning of the block for condition 1 (resp. 2), when the row gets a value of one.

We supply an online and open-source example working with Python (9).

IV.References

1. Cattan G, Andreev A, Mendoza C, Congedo M. The Impact of Passive Head-Mounted Virtual Reality Devices on the Quality of EEG Signals. In Delft: The Eurographics Association; 2018 [cited 2018 Apr 16]. Available from: https://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.2312/vriphys20181064

2. Pfurtscheller G, Stancák A, Neuper C. Event-related synchronization (ERS) in the alpha band — an electrophysiological correlate of cortical idling: A review. Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Nov 1;24(1):39–46.

3. Banquet JP. Spectral analysis of the EEG in meditation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1973 Aug 1;35(2):143–51.

4. Antonenko P, Paas F, Grabner R, van Gog T. Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive Load. Educ Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec 1;22(4):425–38.

5. Rodrigues PLC, Congedo M, Jutten C. Multivariate Time-Series Analysis Via Manifold Learning. In: 2018 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP). 2018. p. 573–7.

6. Renard Y, Lotte F, Gibert G, Congedo M, Maby E, Delannoy V, et al. OpenViBE: An Open-Source Software Platform to Design, Test, and Use Brain–Computer Interfaces in Real and Virtual Environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2010 Feb 1;19(1):35–53.

7. Arrouët C, Congedo M, Marvie J-E, Lamarche F, Lécuyer A, Arnaldi B. Open-ViBE: A Three Dimensional Platform for Real-Time Neuroscience. J Neurother. 2005 Jul 8;9(1):3–25.

8. Mandal MK. C++ Library for Serial Communication with Arduino [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Dec 15]. Available from : https://github.com/manashmndl/SerialPort

9. Rodrigues PLC. Alpha-Waves-Dataset [Internet]. Grenoble: GIPSA-lab; 2018. Available from : https://github.com/plcrodrigues/Alpha-Waves-Dataset

This data set consists of electroencephalography (EEG) data from 50 (Subject1 – Subject50) participants with acute ischemic stroke aged between 30 and 77 years. The participants included 39 male and 11 female. The time after stroke ranged from 1 days to 30 days. 22 participants had right hemisphere hemiplegia and 28 participants had left hemisphere hemiplegia. All participants were originally right-handed. Each of the participants sat in front of a computer screen with an arm resting on a pillow on their lap or on a table and they carried out the instructions given on the computer screen. At the trial start, a picture with text description which was circulated with left right hand, were presented for 2s. We asked the participants to focus their mind on the hand motor imagery which was instructed, at the same time, the video of ipsilateral hand movement is displayed on the computer screen and lasts for 4s. Next, take a 2s break.

Dataset

Synthetic EEG data generated by the ‘bai’ model based on real data.

  Features/Columns:

No: "Number" Sex: "Gender" Age: "Age of participants" EEG Date: "The date of the EEG" Education: "Education level" IQ: "IQ level of participants" Main Disorder: "General class definition of the disorder" Specific Disorder: "Specific class definition of the disorder"

Total Features/Columns: 1140

  Content:

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Bipolar Disorder Schizophrenia… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Neurazum/General-Disorders-EEG-Dataset-v1.

Description

We collected EEG signal data from 4 drivers while they were awake and asleep using NeuroSky MindWave sensor. For safety precautions they weren't actually driving while acquiring the signals. Each driver wore the helmet for 5-8 minutes for each label (sleepy, not sleepy) and the signals are acquired approximately every second. The signals are measured in units of microvolts squared per hertz (μV²/Hz). This is a measure of the power of the EEG signal at a particular frequency.

The high values that you are seeing are likely due to the fact that the MindWave sensor is only measuring EEG data from a single location on the forehead. This is in contrast to medical-grade EEG devices, which typically use multiple electrodes placed on different parts of the scalp.

Methodology

The driver would wear the NeuroSky MindWave headset connected by a USB stick to the laptop and we would collect EEG signals from their brain. The NeuroSky mindwave headset is a single channel headset that measures the voltage between an electrode resting on the frontal lobe (forehead) and two electrodes (one ground and one reference) each in contact with one earlobe. The drivers were instructed to be awake or asleep and their EEG signals were recorded accordingly.

Content

• Attention and meditation are calculated from the headset itself, we didn't consider it a reliable feature.
• All EEG signals are divided and specified by the headset. There was no signal preprocessing done. # Inspiration
• This dataset was made for our graduation project. We got an A- (90%).
• Our highest accuracy was 82%, hopefully you can do even better.
• I thought about uploading this dataset since we worked hard on it and it's a waste seeing it idle after we got our grade so hopefully other people might find it useful too! # More references
• here is our proposal document. The similar systems section would be very useful
• you will find some results at the end of the document they were used using this dataset as it used the same helmet as ours although not the same classification and that's why we got poor results but it was for a start

We used a high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG) system, with 128 customized electrode locations, to record from 17 individuals with migraine (12 female) in the interictal period, and 18 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects, during visual (vertical grating pattern) and auditory (modulated tone) stimulation which varied in temporal frequency (4 and 6Hz), and during rest. This dataset includes the EEG raw data related to the paper entitled Chamanzar, Haigh, Grover, and Behrmann (2020), Abnormalities in cortical pattern of coherence in migraine detected using ultra high-density EEG. The link to our paper will be made available as soon as it is published online.

This project demonstrates a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) simulation using real EEG signals to classify binary decisions (Yes/No). It is designed as an accessible prototype for researchers and students to understand and explore cognitive signal processing—without needing expensive hardware.

Univ. of Bonn’ and ‘CHB-MIT Scalp EEG Database’ are publically available datasets which are the most sought after amongst researchers. Bonn dataset is very small compared to CHB-MIT. But still researchers prefer Bonn as it is in simple '.txt' format. The dataset being published here is a preprocessed form of CHB-MIT. The dataset is available in '.csv' format.

The Harvard EEG Database will encompass data gathered from four hospitals affiliated with Harvard University: Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), and Boston Children's Hospital (BCH). The EEG data includes three types:

rEEG: "routine EEGs" recorded in the outpatient setting.
EMU: recordings obtained in the inpatient setting, within the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU).
ICU/LTM: recordings obtained from acutely and critically ill patients within the intensive care unit (ICU).

This dataset contains EEG recordings from 18 subjects listening to one of two competing speech audio streams. Continuous speech in trials of ~50 sec. was presented to normal hearing listeners in simulated rooms with different degrees of reverberation. Subjects were asked to attend one of two spatially separated speakers (one male, one female) and ignore the other. Repeated trials with presentation of a single talker were also recorded. The data were recorded in a double-walled soundproof booth at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) using a 64-channel Biosemi system and digitized at a sampling rate of 512 Hz. Full details can be found in:

• Søren A. Fuglsang, Torsten Dau & Jens Hjortkjær (2017): Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-life environments. NeuroImage, 156, 435-444

and

• Daniel D.E. Wong, Søren A. Fuglsang, Jens Hjortkjær, Enea Ceolini, Malcolm Slaney & Alain de Cheveigné: A Comparison of Temporal Response Function Estimation Methods for Auditory Attention Decoding. Frontiers in Neuroscience, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00531

The data is organized in format of the publicly available COCOHA Matlab Toolbox. The preproc_script.m demonstrates how to import and align the EEG and audio data. The script also demonstrates some EEG preprocessing steps as used the Wong et al. paper above. The AUDIO.zip contains wav-files with the speech audio used in the experiment. The EEG.zip contains MAT-files with the EEG/EOG data for each subject. The EEG/EOG data are found in data.eeg with the following channels:

• channels 1-64: scalp EEG electrodes
• channel 65: right mastoid electrode
• channel 66: left mastoid electrode
• channel 67: vertical EOG below right eye
• channel 68: horizontal EOG right eye
• channel 69: vertical EOG above right eye
• channel 70: vertical EOG below left eye
• channel 71: horizontal EOG left eye
• channel 72: vertical EOG above left eye

The expinfo table contains information about experimental conditions, including what what speaker the listener was attending to in different trials. The expinfo table contains the following information:

• attend_mf: attended speaker (1=male, 2=female)
• attend_lr: spatial position of the attended speaker (1=left, 2=right)
• acoustic_condition: type of acoustic room (1= anechoic, 2= mild reverberation, 3= high reverberation, see Fuglsang et al. for details)
• n_speakers: number of speakers presented (1 or 2)
• wavfile_male: name of presented audio wav-file for the male speaker
• wavfile_female: name of presented audio wav-file for the female speaker (if any)
• trigger: trigger event value for each trial also found in data.event.eeg.value

DATA_preproc.zip contains the preprocessed EEG and audio data as output from preproc_script.m.

The dataset was created within the COCOHA Project: Cognitive Control of a Hearing Aid

Welcome to the resting state EEG dataset collected at the University of San Diego and curated by Alex Rockhill at the University of Oregon.

Please email arockhil@uoregon.edu before submitting a manuscript to be published in a peer-reviewed journal using this data, we wish to ensure that the data to be analyzed and interpretted with scientific integrity so as not to mislead the public about findings that may have clinical relevance.

Note that UPDRS rating scales were collected by laboratory personell who had completed online training and not a board-certified neurologist. Results should be interpretted accordingly, especially that analyses based largely on these ratings should be taken with the appropriate amount of uncertainty.

In addition to contacting the aforementioned email, please cite the following papers:

Nicko Jackson, Scott R. Cole, Bradley Voytek, Nicole C. Swann. Characteristics of Waveform Shape in Parkinson's Disease Detected with Scalp Electroencephalography. eNeuro 20 May 2019, 6 (3) ENEURO.0151-19.2019; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0151-19.2019.

Swann NC, de Hemptinne C, Aron AR, Ostrem JL, Knight RT, Starr PA. Elevated synchrony in Parkinson disease detected with electroencephalography. Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov;78(5):742-50. doi: 10.1002/ana.24507. Epub 2015 Sep 2. PMID: 26290353; PMCID: PMC4623949.

George JS, Strunk J, Mak-McCully R, Houser M, Poizner H, Aron AR. Dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease decreases cortical beta band coherence in the resting state and increases cortical beta band power during executive control. Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Aug 8;3:261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.07.013. PMID: 24273711; PMCID: PMC3814961.

Appelhoff, S., Sanderson, M., Brooks, T., Vliet, M., Quentin, R., Holdgraf, C., Chaumon, M., Mikulan, E., Tavabi, K., Höchenberger, R., Welke, D., Brunner, C., Rockhill, A., Larson, E., Gramfort, A. and Jas, M. (2019). MNE-BIDS: Organizing electrophysiological data into the BIDS format and facilitating their analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 4: (1896).

Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6, 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8.

Note: see this discussion on the structure of the json files that is sufficient but not optimal and will hopefully be changed in future versions of BIDS: https://neurostars.org/t/behavior-metadata-without-tsv-event-data-related-to-a-neuroimaging-data/6768/25.

General information

The dataset provides resting-state EEG data (eyes open,partially eyes closed) from 71 participants who underwent two experiments involving normal sleep (NS---session1) and sleep deprivation(SD---session2) .The dataset also provides information on participants' sleepiness and mood states. （Please note here Session 1 (NS) and Session 2 (SD) is not the time order, the time order is counterbalanced across participants and is listed in metadata.）

Dataset

Presentation

The data collection was initiated in March 2019 and was terminated in December 2020. The detailed description of the dataset is currently under working by Chuqin Xiang,Xinrui Fan,Duo Bai,Ke Lv and Xu Lei, and will submit to Scientific Data for publication.

EEG acquisition

• EEG system (Brain Products GmbH, Steing- rabenstr, Germany, 61 electrodes)
• Sampling frequency: 500Hz
• Impedances were kept below 5k

Contact

 * If you have any questions or comments, please contact:
 * Xu Lei: xlei@swu.edu.cn   

Article

Xiang, C., Fan, X., Bai, D. et al. A resting-state EEG dataset for sleep deprivation. Sci Data 11, 427 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03268-2

This data is linked to the publication "Electrophysiological signatures of brain aging in autism spectrum disorder" by Dickinson, Jeste and Milne, in which it is referenced as Dataset 1.EEG data were acquired via Biosemi Active two EEG system. The original recordings have been converted to .set and .fdt files via EEGLAB as uploaded here. There is a .fdt and a .set file for each recording, the .fdt file contains the data, the .set file contains information about the parameters of the recording (see https://eeglab.org/tutorials/ for further information). The files can be opened within EEGLAB software.The data were acquired from 28 individuals with a diagnosis of an autism spectrum condition and 28 neurotypical controls aged between 18 and 68 years. The paradigm that generated the data was a 2.5 minute (150 seconds) period of eyes closed resting.Ethical approval for data collection and data sharing was given by the Health Research Authority [IRAS ID = 212171].Only data from participants who provided signed consent for data sharing were included in this work and uploaded here.

This dataset comprises EEG recordings from eight ALS patients aged between 45.5 and 74 years. Patients exhibited revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) scores ranging from 0 to 46, with time since symptom onset (TSSO) varying between 12 and 113 months. Notably, no disease progression was reported during the study period, ensuring stability in clinical conditions. The participants were recruited from the Penn State Hershey Medical Center ALS Clinic and had confirmed ALS diagnoses without significant dementia. This rigorous selection criterion ensured the validity and reliability of the dataset for motor imagery analysis in an ALS population.The EEG data were collected using 19 electrodes placed according to the international 10-20 system (FP1, FP2, F7, F3, FZ, F4, F8, T7, C3, CZ, C4, T8, P7, P3, PZ, P4, P8, O1, O2), with signals referenced to linked earlobes and a ground electrode at FPz. Additionally, three electrooculogram (EOG) electrodes were employed to facilitate artifact removal, maintaining impedance levels below 10 kΩ throughout data acquisition. The data were amplified using two g.USBamp systems (g.tec GmbH) and recorded via the BCI2000 software suite, with supplementary preprocessing in MATLAB. All experimental procedures adhered strictly to Penn State University’s IRB protocol PRAMSO40647EP, ensuring ethical compliance.Each participant underwent four brain-computer interface (BCI) sessions conducted over a period of 1 to 2 months. Each session consisted of four runs, with 10 trials per class (left hand, right hand, and rest) for a total of 40 trials per session. The sessions began with a calibration run to initialize the system, followed by feedback runs during which participants controlled a cursor's movement through motor imagery, specifically imagined grasping movements. The study design, focused on motor imagery (MI), generated a total of 160 trials per participant over two months.This dataset holds significance in studying the longitudinal dynamics of motor imagery decoding in ALS patients. To ensure reproducibility of our findings and to promote advancements in the field, we have received explicit permission from Prof. Geronimo of Penn State University to distribute this dataset in the processed format for research purposes. The original publication of this collection can be found below.How to use this dataset: This dataset is structured in MATLAB as a collection of subject-specific structs, where each subject is represented as a single struct. Each struct contains three fields:L: Trials corresponding to Left Motor Imagery.R: Trials corresponding to Right Motor Imagery.Re: Trials corresponding to Rest state.Each field contains an array of trials, where each trial is represented as a matrix with, Rows as Timestamps, and Columns as channels.Primary Collection: Geronimo A, Simmons Z, Schiff SJ. Performance predictors of brain-computer interfaces in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of neural engineering 2016 13. 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026002.All code for any publications with this data has been made publicly available at the following link:https://github.com/rishannp/Auto-Adaptive-FBCSPhttps://github.com/rishannp/Motor-Imagery---Graph-Attention-Network

EEG signals with 256 channels captured from 11 subjects executing a SSVEP-based experimental protocol. Five different frequencies (6.66, 7.50, 8.57, 10.00 and 12.00 Hz) have been used for the visual stimulation, and the EGI 300 Geodesic EEG System (GES 300), using a 256-channel HydroCel Geodesic Sensor Net (HCGSN) and a sampling rate of 250 Hz has been used for capturing the signals. Check https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lGBVvCX5d8&feature=youtu.be for a video demonstrating one trial.Check https://github.com/MAMEM/ssvep-eeg-processing-toolbox for the processing toolbox.Check http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.00904 for the technical report.

This dataset contains 848,640 records with 17 columns, representing EEG (Electroencephalogram) signals recorded from multiple electrode positions on the scalp, along with a status label. The dataset is be related to the study of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).

Features (16 continuous variables, float64): Each feature corresponds to the electrical activity recorded from standard EEG electrode placements based on the international 10-20 system:

Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8

T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4

T5, P3, Pz, P4

These channels measure brain activity in different cortical regions (frontal, temporal, central, and parietal lobes).

Target variable (1 categorical variable, int64):

status: Represents the condition or classification of the subject at the time of recording (e.g., patient vs. control, or stage of Alzheimer’s disease).

Size & Integrity:

Rows: 848,640 samples

Columns: 17 (16 EEG features + 1 status label)

Data types: 16 float features, 1 integer label

Missing values: None (clean dataset)

This dataset is suitable for machine learning and deep learning applications such as:

EEG signal classification (AD vs. healthy subjects)

Brain activity pattern recognition

Feature extraction and dimensionality reduction (e.g., PCA, wavelet transforms)

Time-series analysis of EEG recordings

Experiment Details Electroencephalography recordings from 16 subjects to fast streams of gabor-like stimuli. Images were presented in rapid serial visual presentation streams at 6.67Hz and 20Hz rates. Participants performed an orthogonal fixation colour change detection task.

Experiment length: 1 hour Raw and preprocessed data are available online through openneuro: https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds004357. Supplementary Material and analysis scripts are available on github: https://github.com/Tijl/features-eeg

This database includes the de-identified EEG data from 62 healthy individuals who participated in a brain-computer interface (BCI) study. All subjects underwent 7-11 sessions of BCI training which involves controlling a computer cursor to move in one-dimensional and two-dimensional spaces using subject’s “intent”. EEG data were recorded with 62 electrodes. In addition to the EEG data, behavioral data including the online success rate of BCI cursor control are also included.This dataset was collected under support from the National Institutes of Health via grants AT009263, EB021027, NS096761, MH114233, RF1MH to Dr. Bin He. Correspondence about the dataset: Dr. Bin He, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail: bhe1@andrew.cmu.edu This dataset has been used and analyzed to study the learning of BCI control and the effects of mind-body awareness training on this process. The results are reported in: Stieger et al, “Mindfulness Improves Brain Computer Interface Performance by Increasing Control over Neural Activity in the Alpha Band,” Cerebral Cortex, 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa234). Please cite this paper if you use any data included in this dataset.