Facebook
TwitterThe Species of Greatest Conservation Need National Database is an aggregation of lists from State Wildlife Action Plans. Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) are wildlife species that need conservation attention as listed in action plans. In this database, we have validated scientific names from original documents against taxonomic authorities to increase consistency among names enabling aggregation and summary. This database does not replace the information contained in the original State Wildlife Action Plans. The database includes SGCN lists from 56 states, territories, and districts, encompassing action plans spanning from 2005 to 2022. State Wildlife Action Plans undergo updates at least once every 10 years by respective wildlife agencies. The SGCN list data from these action plans have been compiled in partnership with individual wildlife management agencies, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. The SGCN National Database consists of three data tables: "source_data", "process_data", and "validated_data". Most users will likely find the "sgcn_species_all_records" table that combines all three tables most useful to compare "source_" names and "validated_" names and to aggregate and summarize using validated names. The "source_data" table provides an archive of all SGCN records listed by conservation authorities over multiple actions plans, which includes the scientific names, common names, locations, and year of action plan. The "process_data" table incorporates processing information, including the archiving and processing dates along with persistent identifiers used for record documentation, while the "validated_data" table provides the taxonomic identities from the matched taxonomic source, including the standardized scientific name, common name, and taxonomic ranks as well as links to supplementary taxonomic information.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) are those which have been given greater protection under The Conservation (Natural Habitats, etc.) Regulations 1995 (Northern Ireland) (as amended). They have been designated because of a possible threat to the special habitats or species which they contain and to provide increased protection to a variety of animals, plants, and habitats of importance to biodiversity both on a national and international scale. All of the SAC sites chosen under The Conservation (Natural Habitats, etc.) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1995 (as amended) are collectively known as the UK national site network which is a network of protected areas across the EU, which forms part of a wider international Emerald Network of Areas of Special Conservation Interest. The sites are chosen according to scientific criteria to ensure favourable conservation status of each habitat type and species. ‘Favourable conservation status’ means managing the site to ensure the special habitats and species are healthy.
Facebook
TwitterThis hosted feature layer has been published in RI State Plane Feet NAD 83. Non-State Conservation lands are real property permanently protected from future development by fee simple ownership, conservation or other restrictive easements, or deed restrictions held or enforceable by recognized land protection organizations other than the State of Rhode Island. These include, but are not limited to, the Audubon Society of Rhode Island, The Nature Conservancy, RI municipal governments, The United States Fish & Wildlife Service, private land trusts and other conservation groups. In addition to permanent legally conserved land, a number of properties documented in this dataset are included in a category called "Conservation Intent." This designation applies to areas such as local parks, recreation areas, or lands associated with cluster sub-division developments that are not strictly protected by a fee simple or easement interest held by a recognized conservation organization. Instead they are considered protected by the good-will of the owners (both municipal and private) to prevent or restrict future development beyond the existing use.
Facebook
TwitterA Special Area of Conservation (SAC) is the land designated under Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Data supplied has the status of "Candidate". The data does not include "Possible" Sites. Boundaries are mapped against Ordnance Survey MasterMap.Full metadata can be viewed on data.gov.uk.
Facebook
TwitterNSW Private Land Conservation Agreements (NSW PLC Agreements) is an authoritative dataset that brings together all private protected areas administered by the NSW Biodiversity Conservation Trust (BCT). It replaces a previous dataset known as ‘BCT Agreements’ which was first released by the BCT in 2019. NSW PLC Agreements organises private protected areas into a single layer with geometric overlaps between different agreement types. The dataset spatially represents the boundaries of agreements made under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 and preceding legislation. Individual Deeds of Agreement should be consulted for specific information about the extent of the subject land and legal obligations of the land owner. Agreements entered into under the BC Act are registered on the land title, binding current and successive landowners. Agreements established under preceding legislation may not be registered on title. Three agreement types are represented in the dataset (1) Biodiversity Stewardship Agreements (BSA) (formerly BioBanking agreements), (2) Conservation Agreements (CA), and (3) Wildlife Refuge Agreements (WRA). The dataset is for internal use only, and is not for public distribution or display. Data and Resources
Facebook
TwitterPublic Domain Mark 1.0https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) is a conservation NGO working globallly and in PNG
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is primarily intended to be used for informing development decisions. This dataset is incomplete, and contains some authoritative data provided by local authorities, as well as conservation area boundaries from Historic England, and other secondary sources found on data.gov.uk. The data currently contains a number of duplicate areas we are working to remove.
Facebook
TwitterSites of importance for nature conservation (SINC) in York. For further information please visit City of York Council's website *Please note that the data published within this dataset is a live API link to CYC's GIS server. Any changes made to the master copy of the data will be immediately reflected in the resources of this dataset.The date shown in the "Last Updated" field of each GIS resource reflects when the data was first published.
Facebook
TwitterThis graph shows the number of members by national environmental and conservation organizations in 2005-2006. The Sierra Club had 778,830 members.
Facebook
TwitterA conservation easement, according to the Land Trust Alliance, is “a legal agreement between a landowner and a land trust or government agency that permanently limits uses of the land in order to protect its conservation values.” The National Conservation Easement Database (NCED) is the first national database of conservation easements in the United States. Voluntary and secure, the NCED respects landowner privacy and will not collect landowner names or sensitive information. This public-private partnership brings together national conservation groups, local and regional land trusts, and state and federal agencies around a common objective. The NCED provides a comprehensive picture of the estimated 40 million acres of privately owned conservation easement lands, recognizing their contribution to America’s natural heritage, a vibrant economy, and healthy communities.Before the NCED was created no single, nationwide system existed for sharing and managing information about conservation easements. By building the first national database and web site to access this information, the NCED helps agencies, land trusts, and other organizations plan more strategically, identify opportunities for collaboration, advance public accountability, and raise the profile of what's happening on-the-ground in the name of conservation.With the initial support of the U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities, NCED is the result of a collaboration between five environmental non-profits: The Trust for Public Land, Ducks Unlimited, Defenders of Wildlife, Conservation Biology Institute, and NatureServe.
Facebook
TwitterThe Conservation Practice Effectiveness Database compiles information on the effectiveness of a suite of conservation practices. This database presents a compilation of data on the effectiveness of innovative practices developed to treat contaminants in surface runoff and tile drainage water from agricultural landscapes. Traditional conservation practices such as no-tillage and conservation crop rotation are included in the database, as well as novel practices such as drainage water management, blind inlets, and denitrification bioreactors. This will be particularly useful to conservation planners seeking new approaches to water quality problems associated with dissolved constituents, such as nitrate or soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), and for researchers seeking to understand the circumstances in which such practices are most effective. Another novel feature of the database is the presentation of information on how individual conservation practices impact multiple water quality concerns. This information will be critical to enabling conservationists and policy makers to avoid (or at least be aware of) undesirable tradeoffs, whereby great efforts are made to improve water quality related to one resource concern (e.g., sediment) but exacerbate problems related to other concerns (e.g., nitrate or SRP). Finally, we note that the Conservation Practice Effectiveness Database can serve as a source of the soft data needed to calibrate simulation models assessing the potential water quality tradeoffs of conservation practices, including those that are still being developed. This database is updated and refined annually. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: 2019 Conservation Practice Effectiveness (CoPE) Database. File Name: Conservation_Practice_Effectiveness_2019.xlsxResource Description: This version of the database was published in 2019.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
ACE is a CDFW effort to analyze large amounts of map-based data in a targeted, strategic way, and expressed visually, so decisions can be informed around important goals like conservation of biodiversity, habitat connectivity, and climate change resiliency. The ACE maps provide a coarse level view of information for conservation planning purposes, ranging from ecological research and modeling to local land-use planning and conservation decision-making. However, they do not replace the need for site-specific evaluation of biological resources and should not be used for regulatory purposes.
Facebook
TwitterThe National Conservation Easement Database (NCED) is the first national database of conservation easement information, compiling records from land trusts and public agencies throughout the United States. This public-private partnership brings together national conservation groups, local and regional land trusts, and local, state and federal agencies around a common objective. This effort helps agencies, land trusts, and other organizations plan more strategically, identify opportunities for collaboration, advance public accountability, and raise the profile of what’s happening on-the-ground in the name of conservation.For an introductory tour of the NCED and its benefits check out the story map.
Facebook
TwitterThis data set shows point locations of Bird Conservation Areas. Bird Conservation Areas are New York State lands that have been officially designated for their value to bird conservation. Points are approximate locations and may represent large areas.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 2.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/
License information was derived automatically
Conservation areas in York. These are areas of special architectural or historical interest. *Please note that the data published within this dataset is a live API link to CYC's GIS server. Any changes made to the master copy of the data will be immediately reflected in the resources of this dataset.The date shown in the "Last Updated" field of each GIS resource reflects when the data was first published.
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
Polygon geometry with attributes displaying conservation areas as defined by the comprehensive plan, FUTUREBR, in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana.
Facebook
TwitterConservation area boundaries in Chicago. To view or use these files, compression software and special GIS software, such as ESRI ArcGIS, is required.
Facebook
TwitterSites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) in the London Borough of Barnet as polygon features. SINCs are intended to provide protection for wildlife habitats. It is not a statutory designation but protection is considered through the planning process. Sites are classified hierarchically as Metropolitan, Borough Grade I, Borough Grade II or Local. Outside of London SINCs are referred to as Local Wildlife Sites. Licence This dataset has been published by the London Borough of Barnet under the Open Government Licence (OGL) (v3). The licence has been applied following the Public Sector Geospatial Agreement 'presumption to publish' process in August 2023. Acknowledgements Please acknowledge the Information Provider through the following attribution statement: © London Borough of Barnet, 2025, OGL v3.0 Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right, 2025
Facebook
TwitterToday, conservation districts promote education, incentive-based and voluntary approaches to conservation. They serve as non-regulatory, trusted, local partners helping people care for natural resources.Conservation districts may:Rent out a wide array of equipment for conservation practices to land users. Equipment may include tree planters, fabric layers, weed sprayers, weed badgers, conservation tillage drills, grass seeders, and tree chippersCreate and maintain interpretive trails and pollinator gardensLead and work on local and regional river basin or watershed issuesEducate urban homeowners on small acreage managementManage projects throughout the stateLead, sponsor or promote workshops throughout the stateIn the early 1930's, along with the greatest depression this nation ever experienced, came an equally unparalleled ecological disaster known as the Dust Bowl. Following a severe and sustained drought in the Great Plains, the region's soil began to erode and blow away; creating huge black dust storms that blotted out the sun and swallowed the countryside. On Capitol Hill, Congress unanimously passed legislation declaring soil and water conservation a national policy and priority. In 1937, President Roosevelt wrote the governors of all the states recommending legislation that would allow local landowners to form soil conservations.The first conservation districts were formed in Sheridan and Wibaux Counties in 1939 and today, most land in Montana is within a boundary of our 58 conservation districts.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCCs) are public-private partnerships composed of states, tribes, federal agencies, non-governmental organizations, universities, international jurisdictions, and others working together to address landscape and seascape scale conservation issues. LCCs inform resource management decisions to address broad-scale stressors-including habitat fragmentation, genetic isolation, spread of invasive species, and water scarcity-all of which are magnified by a rapidly changing climate. For further information go to http://lccnetwork.org. The complete data and metadata is available at https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/55b943ade4b09a3b01b65d78 The previous 2011 LCC Network Areas data is available at https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/52f2735ee4b0a6f0bd498c2fInherent in any data set used to develop graphical representations, are limitations of accuracy as determined by, among others, the source, scale and resolution of the data. While the USFWS makes every effort to represent the data as completely and accurately as possible (given existing time and resource constraints), the USFWS gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. In addition, the USFWS shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained in. Graphical representations provided by the use of this data do not represent a legal description of any kind.
Facebook
TwitterThe Species of Greatest Conservation Need National Database is an aggregation of lists from State Wildlife Action Plans. Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) are wildlife species that need conservation attention as listed in action plans. In this database, we have validated scientific names from original documents against taxonomic authorities to increase consistency among names enabling aggregation and summary. This database does not replace the information contained in the original State Wildlife Action Plans. The database includes SGCN lists from 56 states, territories, and districts, encompassing action plans spanning from 2005 to 2022. State Wildlife Action Plans undergo updates at least once every 10 years by respective wildlife agencies. The SGCN list data from these action plans have been compiled in partnership with individual wildlife management agencies, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. The SGCN National Database consists of three data tables: "source_data", "process_data", and "validated_data". Most users will likely find the "sgcn_species_all_records" table that combines all three tables most useful to compare "source_" names and "validated_" names and to aggregate and summarize using validated names. The "source_data" table provides an archive of all SGCN records listed by conservation authorities over multiple actions plans, which includes the scientific names, common names, locations, and year of action plan. The "process_data" table incorporates processing information, including the archiving and processing dates along with persistent identifiers used for record documentation, while the "validated_data" table provides the taxonomic identities from the matched taxonomic source, including the standardized scientific name, common name, and taxonomic ranks as well as links to supplementary taxonomic information.