5 datasets found
  1. e

    Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ

    • ebi.ac.uk
    • omicsdi.org
    Updated Jul 5, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tim Griffin (2014). Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ [Dataset]. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD000807
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2014
    Authors
    Tim Griffin
    Variables measured
    Proteomics
    Description

    iTRAQ-based comparison of proteins derived from oral cells collected by brush biopsy. Protein abundance levels compared between oral pre-malignant cells, oral cancer cells and healthy normal cells, all collected from human patients. Two separate iTRAQ labeled biological replicate analyses were conducted.

  2. Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. cytology.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 7, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. cytology. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. cytology.

  3. f

    Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients.

  4. D

    Cytology Brush Market Report | Global Forecast From 2023 To 2032

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Sep 8, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2023). Cytology Brush Market Report | Global Forecast From 2023 To 2032 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/cytology-brush-market-report
    Explore at:
    pptx, csv, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 8, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description


    Market Overview:

    The global cytology brush market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.5% from 2022 to 2030. The growth in the market can be attributed to the increasing incidence of cancer and other diseases, rising demand for early diagnosis and treatment, and technological advancements in the field of cytology. The global cytology brush market is segmented by type, application, and region. By type, the market is divided into metal cytology brushes and plastic cytology brushes. By application, it is classified into the respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, gynecological applications such as (Cervical Cancer Screening & diagnosis), urinary tract (e.g., Bladder Cancer detection), oral cavity (e.g., oral cancer screening), oncology (e.g., lymph node biopsy for staging cancers), and others (including environmental sampling). Geographically, it is analyzed across North America (U.S., Canada & Mexico), Latin America (Brazil & Mexico only), Europe(Germany, France, Italy, Spain, U K, Rest Of Europe), Asia Pacific (Japan, China, India, Australia, South Korea, Rest Of APAC) & Middle East Africa (GCC Countries Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Rest Of MEA).


    Product Definition:

    A cytology brush is a medical device used for the collection of cells from a surface. The bristles on the brush are typically made of nylon and are either straight or curved. Cytology brushes are commonly used to collect cells from the cervix to screen for cervical cancer.


    Metal Cytology Brushes:

    Metal cytology brushes are used for the collection of cells from a tissue or body part. The metal cytology brush is made up of stainless steel and has round Bristle-like projections at the end. It is passed through the tissues to collect cellular samples which can be examined under a microscope for research purposes. The major application areas where metal cytology brushes are used include cancer research, stem cell research, and drug discovery & development studies.


    Plastic Cytology Brushes:

    Plastic cytology brushes are used in the field of cytology for the preparation of tissue samples. The most commonly used plastic brush is known as the bone marrow aspirate brush and its application is to collect cellular debris from bone marrow aspiration procedures. Plastic brushes are also useful in collecting cells from peripheral blood, skin biopsy, and other body fluids during disease diagnoses such as lymphoma or leukemia.


    Application Insights:

    The global cytology brush market is segmented by application into the respiratory tract, gastrointestinal, female reproductive organ, urological tract, and oral cavity. The respiratory tract was the largest application segment in 2021 owing to the increasing prevalence of lung cancer and other respiratory diseases. The growth of oncology as a key revenue-generating sector for many developed countries such as the U.S., Germany, France & UK is expected to boost product demand over the forecast period.

    Growth in the number of patients suffering from various types of cancer has resulted in increased demand for diagnostic procedures involving the use of cytological brushes during medical imaging procedures such as Computed Tomography (CT) scans or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This factor along with the growing adoption rate among hospitals & healthcare facilities is anticipated to drive product demand over the forecast period in near future.


    Regional Analysis:

    North America dominated the global market in terms of revenue share in 2021. The presence of well-established healthcare facilities and highly developed diagnostic technologies are some factors contributing to the growth of this regional market. Moreover, increasing research initiatives by major companies for developing advanced cytology brushes are also expected to drive industry growth over the forecast period. Asia Pacific is anticipated to witness lucrative CAGR during the forecast period owing to high unmet clinical needs coupled with rapidly improving healthcare infrastructure and economic development in emerging countries such as China, India, Singapore, South Korea & Japan. Moreover, growing medical tourism due to affordable treatment options will boost demand for cytology brush products leading to an increase in revenue generation from this region during future years.


    Growth Factors:

    • Increasing demand for early cancer diagnosis and treatment
    • Rising prevalence of cancer and other diseases
    • Technological advancements in cytology brush products
    • Growing awareness about the b

  5. Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists.

  6. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Tim Griffin (2014). Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ [Dataset]. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD000807

Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 5, 2014
Authors
Tim Griffin
Variables measured
Proteomics
Description

iTRAQ-based comparison of proteins derived from oral cells collected by brush biopsy. Protein abundance levels compared between oral pre-malignant cells, oral cancer cells and healthy normal cells, all collected from human patients. Two separate iTRAQ labeled biological replicate analyses were conducted.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu