9 datasets found
  1. Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • ebi.ac.uk
    xml
    Updated May 7, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tim Griffin; Timothy Jon Griffin (2014). Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=pxd000807
    Explore at:
    xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 7, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    University of Minnesota
    Authors
    Tim Griffin; Timothy Jon Griffin
    Variables measured
    Proteomics
    Description

    iTRAQ-based comparison of proteins derived from oral cells collected by brush biopsy. Protein abundance levels compared between oral pre-malignant cells, oral cancer cells and healthy normal cells, all collected from human patients. Two separate iTRAQ labeled biological replicate analyses were conducted.

  2. O

    Oral Cancer Diagnosis Report

    • marketresearchforecast.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Jun 9, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Market Research Forecast (2025). Oral Cancer Diagnosis Report [Dataset]. https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/reports/oral-cancer-diagnosis-155057
    Explore at:
    pdf, doc, pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Market Research Forecast
    License

    https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global oral cancer diagnosis market is experiencing robust growth, driven by rising prevalence of oral cancers, advancements in diagnostic technologies, and increasing awareness about early detection. The market, estimated at $2.5 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $4.2 billion by 2033. This growth is fueled by the adoption of sophisticated diagnostic techniques like visual inspection with toluidine blue, brush cytology, and advanced imaging modalities such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The increasing geriatric population, coupled with lifestyle factors like tobacco and alcohol consumption, contributes significantly to the higher incidence of oral cancer, thereby boosting market demand. Furthermore, the development of minimally invasive diagnostic tools and point-of-care testing is streamlining the diagnostic process and improving patient outcomes, furthering market expansion. Key players in the market, including GE Healthcare, Roche, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Siemens Healthineers, and others, are continuously investing in research and development to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficacy. The market is segmented based on technology (visual inspection, cytology, biopsy, imaging), end-user (hospitals & clinics, research labs), and geography. While North America and Europe currently dominate the market due to established healthcare infrastructure and high awareness, developing regions in Asia-Pacific and Latin America are witnessing significant growth potential owing to rising disposable incomes and improved healthcare accessibility. However, high costs associated with advanced diagnostic technologies and a lack of awareness in certain regions pose challenges to market expansion. The future of the oral cancer diagnosis market is promising, with ongoing innovation focusing on early detection, personalized medicine, and improved patient accessibility.

  3. f

    A smart tele-cytology point-of-care platform for oral cancer screening

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    tiff
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sumsum Sunny; Arun Baby; Bonney Lee James; Dev Balaji; Aparna N. V.; Maitreya H. Rana; Praveen Gurpur; Arunan Skandarajah; Michael D’Ambrosio; Ravindra Doddathimmasandra Ramanjinappa; Sunil Paramel Mohan; Nisheena Raghavan; Uma Kandasarma; Sangeetha N.; Subhasini Raghavan; Naveen Hedne; Felix Koch; Daniel A. Fletcher; Sumithra Selvam; Manohar Kollegal; Praveen Birur N.; Lance Ladic; Amritha Suresh; Hardik J. Pandya; Moni Abraham Kuriakose (2023). A smart tele-cytology point-of-care platform for oral cancer screening [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224885
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Sumsum Sunny; Arun Baby; Bonney Lee James; Dev Balaji; Aparna N. V.; Maitreya H. Rana; Praveen Gurpur; Arunan Skandarajah; Michael D’Ambrosio; Ravindra Doddathimmasandra Ramanjinappa; Sunil Paramel Mohan; Nisheena Raghavan; Uma Kandasarma; Sangeetha N.; Subhasini Raghavan; Naveen Hedne; Felix Koch; Daniel A. Fletcher; Sumithra Selvam; Manohar Kollegal; Praveen Birur N.; Lance Ladic; Amritha Suresh; Hardik J. Pandya; Moni Abraham Kuriakose
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Early detection of oral cancer necessitates a minimally invasive, tissue-specific diagnostic tool that facilitates screening/surveillance. Brush biopsy, though minimally invasive, demands skilled cyto-pathologist expertise. In this study, we explored the clinical utility/efficacy of a tele-cytology system in combination with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based risk-stratification model for early detection of oral potentially malignant (OPML)/malignant lesion. A portable, automated tablet-based tele-cytology platform capable of digitization of cytology slides was evaluated for its efficacy in the detection of OPML/malignant lesions (n = 82) in comparison with conventional cytology and histology. Then, an image pre-processing algorithm was established to segregate cells, ANN was trained with images (n = 11,981) and a risk-stratification model developed. The specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of platform/ stratification model were computed, and agreement was examined using Kappa statistics. The tele-cytology platform, Cellscope, showed an overall accuracy of 84–86% with no difference between tele-cytology and conventional cytology in detection of oral lesions (kappa, 0.67–0.72). However, OPML could be detected with low sensitivity (18%) in accordance with the limitations of conventional cytology. The integration of image processing and development of an ANN-based risk stratification model improved the detection sensitivity of malignant lesions (93%) and high grade OPML (73%), thereby increasing the overall accuracy by 30%. Tele-cytology integrated with the risk stratification model, a novel strategy established in this study, can be an invaluable Point-of-Care (PoC) tool for early detection/screening in oral cancer. This study hence establishes the applicability of tele-cytology for accurate, remote diagnosis and use of automated ANN-based analysis in improving its efficacy.

  4. Sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology vs. histology.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology vs. histology. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t006
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology vs. histology.

  5. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients.

  6. Patient demographics and related clinical parameters of the study.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 11, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Patient demographics and related clinical parameters of the study. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 11, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Patient demographics and related clinical parameters of the study.

  7. Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. histology.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. histology. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. histology.

  8. f

    Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists.

  9. t

    Global Head and Neck Cancer Diagnostic Market Demand, Size and Competitive...

    • techsciresearch.com
    Updated Jun 15, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TechSci Research (2022). Global Head and Neck Cancer Diagnostic Market Demand, Size and Competitive Analysis | TechSci Research [Dataset]. https://www.techsciresearch.com/report/global-head-and-neck-cancer-diagnostic-market/10618.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TechSci Research
    License

    https://www.techsciresearch.com/privacy-policy.aspxhttps://www.techsciresearch.com/privacy-policy.aspx

    Description

    Global Head and Neck Cancer Diagnostic Market Analysis By Size, Share, Price, Trends and Forecast 2017-2027 | TechSci Research, Head and Neck Cancer Diagnostic Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity and Forecast, 2017-2027, Segmented By Type, By Diagnostic Imaging, By Biopsy, By Endoscopy, By Dental Diagnostics, By End User, and By Region

    Pages110
    Market Size
    Forecast Market Size
    CAGR
    Fastest Growing Segment
    Largest Market
    Key Players

  10. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Tim Griffin; Timothy Jon Griffin (2014). Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=pxd000807
Organization logo

Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ

Explore at:
xmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
May 7, 2014
Dataset provided by
University of Minnesota
Authors
Tim Griffin; Timothy Jon Griffin
Variables measured
Proteomics
Description

iTRAQ-based comparison of proteins derived from oral cells collected by brush biopsy. Protein abundance levels compared between oral pre-malignant cells, oral cancer cells and healthy normal cells, all collected from human patients. Two separate iTRAQ labeled biological replicate analyses were conducted.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu