The number of fixed-broadband subscriptions in the United States continued to climb in 2023, reaching *** million. U.S. internet users look to fixed broadband subscriptions for fast, reliable internet connections. However, the increasing viability and affordability of mobile internet solutions may prompt rural users serviced by inferior fixed networks to switch in the near future.

The internet service providers industry uses wired infrastructure to provide clients with internet access and related services, like web hosting, web page designing and consulting related to internet connectivity. Rising internet usage has benefited industry revenue growth, and government-subsidized network expansion has done the same, increasing the number of US broadband connections. A push toward broadband expansion in rural markets and a climb in demand from business customers has boosted industry revenue, which is poised to incline at an annualized rate of 3.5% to $168.5 billion in 2025, including growth of 4.2% in 2025 as investments and activity mount in line with an improving macroeconomic environment. As households increasingly rely on the internet for streaming, gaming, remote work, and cloud computing, ISPs are scrambling to deliver faster and more reliable service. The rising adoption of cloud computing, which involves accessing data online, has boosted demand for dedicated internet access services sold at a higher profit. With increasing demand, providers have begun launching fiber optic networks, rapidly improving connection speeds. Major enterprises that typically benefit from economies of scale also continue to bundle TV and phone, which includes Voice over Internet Protocol services and high-speed internet into one service package, adopting new technology. Consolidation has swept the industry, with blockbuster mergers—such as T-Mobile’s tie-up with Sprint and Verizon’s multi-billion-dollar acquisition push—reshaping market share and intensifying competition. At the same time, average broadband speeds have more than doubled, but ISPs have faced mounting pressure from cord-cutters, OTT competitors and fierce price wars, often leading to flat or declining revenues per user even as consumer bandwidth use reaches new heights. This competitive environment has led to plummeting profit. Looking ahead, the ISP industry shows no sign of slowing down. Over the next five years, fiber expansion and 5G fixed wireless will reach an even greater share of US households. Providers will continue investing heavily in gigabit networks, edge computing and advanced Wi-Fi to keep pace with the explosion in cloud computing, IoT devices and remote work. Retaining customers will hinge on delivering faster speeds, greater reliability, strong security and innovative value-added services, especially as open-access networks and new entrants threaten to erode traditional market advantages. Continued demand will lead to industry revenue growth, poised to climb at an annualized rate of 4.4% to $208.9 billion in 2030.

In 2023, there were about **** fixed broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants in the United States, a slight increase from the previous year. Fixed broadband services offer a fast, reliable internet connection to fixed premises, with fiber connections offering the best connection quality.

The global revenue in the 'Fixed Data' segment of the communication services market was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 0.1 trillion U.S. dollars (+23.26 percent). After the eleventh consecutive increasing year, the revenue is estimated to reach 0.49 trillion U.S. dollars and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the revenue of the 'Fixed Data' segment of the communication services market was continuously increasing over the past years.Find other key market indicators concerning the average revenue per user (ARPU) and revenue growth. The Statista Market Insights cover a broad range of additional markets.

Broadband internet speed map showing maximum available broadband internet speed per US Census block (2010). Data does not include satellite internet providers and terrestrial fixed wireless. Only the providers with the highest maximum advertised downstream speed are displayed. Providers with a lower maximum advertised downstream speed are omitted. Geolocation of 2020 FCC Fixed Broadband Deployment data is based upon the 2010 census blocks created by the US Census Bureau.External Link: FCC Fixed Broadband Deployment Data: December 2020External Link: US Census Bureau TIGER/Line Shapefiles, 2020 CensusExternal Link: US Census Bureau TIGER/Line Shapefiles, 2010 CensusFor questions, problems, or more information, contact gis@atcog.org Ark-Tex Council of Governments Homepage: https://atcog.org/Open Data Portal Homepage: https://open-data-portal-atcog.hub.arcgis.com/

In 2023, over ** percent of U.S. households with a broadband service opted for a ** connection. ** home broadband can deliver a fast, stable home internet connection without the use of fiber or other fixed line networks. It is therefore considered an effective means of closing the digital divide, particularly in rural areas not served by fixed networks.

An analysis of average internet speeds across U.S. states in 2025, highlighting the fastest and slowest regions.

Cox Communications emerged as the front-runner in fixed broadband download speeds in the United States during the final quarter of 2023, delivering a median speed of ****** Mbps. This performance outpaced competitors Spectrum and AT&T Internet, which secured the second and third positions, respectively. The race for faster internet speeds continues to intensify as providers strive to meet growing consumer demands for high-speed connectivity. Fiber Connections Gaining Ground The landscape of fixed internet connections in the U.S. is evolving, with fiber optic networks making significant inroads. Nearly a quarter of all fixed internet connections in the country in 2023 were fiber-based, offering superior speeds and reduced latency compared to traditional cable or DSL services. This shift towards fiber aligns with the global trend of countries investing in advanced internet infrastructure to boost connectivity. Customer Satisfaction and Upload Speeds While download speeds often grab headlines, upload capabilities are increasingly crucial for activities like online gaming, video conferencing, and file sharing. In this arena, AT&T and Frontier stood out, offering the best median fixed broadband upload speeds in the U.S. during the same period. Notably, AT&T's median upload speed was nearly double that of Verizon. This performance aligns with customer satisfaction metrics, as the American Customer Satisfaction Index ranked AT&T's fiber internet service highest among surveyed providers, followed by Verizon Fios.

Introduction

This dataset provides global fixed broadband and mobile (cellular) network performance metrics in zoom level 16 web mercator tiles (approximately 610.8 meters by 610.8 meters at the equator). Data is provided in both Shapefile format as well as Apache Parquet with geometries represented in Well Known Text (WKT) projected in EPSG:4326. Download speed, upload speed, and latency are collected via the Speedtest by Ookla applications for Android and iOS and averaged for each tile. Measurements are filtered to results containing GPS-quality location accuracy.

Content

Quadkeys can act as a unique identifier for the tile. This can be useful for joining data spatially from multiple periods (quarters), creating coarser spatial aggregations without using geospatial functions, spatial indexing, partitioning, and an alternative for storing and deriving the tile geometry.

Two layers are distributed as separate sets of files:

• mobile - Tiles containing tests taken from mobile devices with GPS-quality location and a cellular connection type (e.g. 4G LTE, 5G NR).
• fixed - Tiles containing tests taken from mobile devices with GPS-quality location and a non-cellular connection type (e.g. WiFi, Ethernet).

Quarter 1 refers to data from January to March. Quarter 2 refers to data from April to June. Quarter 3 refers to data from July to September. Quarter 4 refers to data from October to December. All the data is from the year 2020.

Citation

Speedtest® by Ookla® Global Fixed and Mobile Network Performance Maps. Based on analysis by Ookla of Speedtest Intelligence® data for 2020. Provided by Ookla and accessed February 15, 2021. Ookla trademarks used under license and reprinted with permission.

Image Credits: Unsplash - umby

This layer is no longer being actively maintained. For the latest broadband availability data from FCC, please see the FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC). This layer shows fixed broadband availability for every neighborhood in the U.S. and outlying areas for June 2023.This layer is a composite of five sublayers with adjacent scale ranges showing the broadband score across the U.S. and outlying areas, at five different geographies – State, County, Tract, Block Group and Block. The broadband score is an index based on the FCC’s minimum standard of broadband of 25 megabits per second (Mbps) download and 3 Mbps upload. A geography with speeds of 25/3 Mbps is awarded 100 points. Each type of geometry contains housing, population, and internet usage data taken from the following sources:US Census Bureau 2010 Census data (2010)USDA Non-Rural Areas (2013)FCC Form 477 Fixed Broadband Deployment Data (January - June 2021)FCC Population, Housing Unit, and Household Estimates (2019). Note that these are derived from Census and other data.Measurement Lab (Jan - June 2021)Broadband offering data from each provider for all geographies are available in related tables. Field Names / Record StructureThis layer includes over 150 attributes relating to reported speed and service information. In addition:Each block includes housing unit, household, and population estimates from the FCC.Each block has an attribute named WaterOnly that indicates if it is entirely water (yes/no).Each block has two attributes indicating whether it is urban or rural (CensusUrbanRural and USDAUrbanRural). For units larger than blocks, block count (urban/rural) was used to determine this. Some tracts and block groups have an equal number of urban and rural blocks—so a new coded value was introduced: S (split). All blocks are either U or R, while tracts and block groups can be U, R, or S.Each block has three attributes indicating whether it is part of a Tribal Block Group, is part of an American Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian Area (AIANNHA) and the AIANNHA name.US Census and USDA Rurality valuesAmalgamated broadband speed measurement categories based on Form 477. These include:99: All Terrestrial Broadband Plus Satellite98: All Terrestrial Broadband97: Cable Modem96: DSL95: All Other (Electric Power Line, Other Copper Wireline, Other)The FCC Speed Values method is applied to all speeds from all data sources within this service. This includes:Geography: State, County, Tract, Block Group, BlockData source: FCC and M-LabWithin this method, speed values are shown as such:<1 Mbps, reported up to three decimal points>= 1 and < 2 Mbps, rounded to the nearest tenth>= 2 and < 10 Mbps, truncated to the lower integer>= 10 and < 1000 Mbps, rounded to the nearest integer>= 1000 Mbps, the published bandwidth = 1000 MbpsEach sublayer has a varying number of attributes from these sources, depending on what data is available for the level of granularity. The following table displays what information is included with which geometry types: GeometryFCC Form 477 Fixed (Jan - Dec 2020)FCC Demographic Estimates (2019)M-Lab (Jan - Dec 2020)BroadbandNow Avg. Min. Terrestrial Broadband Plan PricesUrban/rural flags (Census and USDA)StateYesYesYesYesNoCountyYesYesYesYesNoTractYesYesNoYesYes (U, R, S)Block GroupYesYesNoYesYes (U, R, S)BlockYesYesNoYesYes (U, R) Additional ResourcesFCC Staff Block EstimatesFixed Broadband Deployment Data from FCC Form 477Digital Divide: Broadband Pricing by State, ZIP Code, and Income Level (BroadbandUSA)Open Internet Measurement (M-Lab)Eligibility Area Map Datasets (USDA)

Rural Internet System Market Outlook

The global rural internet system market size was valued at approximately USD 18 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 32 billion by 2032, growing at a robust CAGR of 6.5% during the forecast period. The key growth factor driving this market is the increasing demand for internet connectivity in remote and rural areas, fueled by governmental initiatives and technological advancements aimed at bridging the digital divide.

One of the primary drivers of growth in the rural internet system market is the global push towards digital inclusivity. Governments around the world are implementing policies and funding projects designed to provide reliable internet access to rural and underserved areas. For instance, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has established the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, which is set to invest billions in rural broadband deployment. Similar initiatives are being undertaken in developing countries, where internet access is being recognized as a crucial factor for economic development and social inclusion.

Another significant growth factor is the advancement in technology, which has made it more feasible and cost-effective to deploy internet systems in rural areas. Technologies such as Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, 5G, and advanced fiber optic networks are breaking down previous barriers to connectivity. Satellite internet, in particular, has seen substantial advancements, with companies like SpaceX’s Starlink and Amazon's Project Kuiper planning to launch thousands of satellites to provide global internet coverage, including hard-to-reach rural areas.

Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the importance of reliable internet access, as remote work, online education, and telehealth services have become more prevalent. This shift has accelerated the demand for rural internet solutions as people in these areas strive to maintain connectivity with educational institutions, employers, and healthcare providers. This trend is expected to continue post-pandemic, providing a sustained boost to the rural internet system market.

Regionally, North America leads the market due to significant government funding and advanced infrastructure, followed closely by Europe and Asia Pacific. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also expected to witness substantial growth, driven by increasing investments in internet infrastructure and rising internet penetration rates.

Technology Analysis

The rural internet system market is segmented by technology into satellite, DSL, fiber optic, fixed wireless, and others. Satellite technology is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by the advancements in LEO satellite technology. Companies like SpaceX and Amazon are investing heavily in satellite constellations that promise to deliver high-speed internet to the most remote corners of the world. These satellites can provide coverage over large areas, making them ideal for rural and underserved regions where traditional infrastructure is lacking.

DSL, or Digital Subscriber Line, remains a significant player in the rural internet system market. Although it has been around for a while, its prevalence in rural areas is due to the existing telephone infrastructure that can be utilized to provide internet services. While not as fast as fiber optic, DSL offers a viable solution for rural areas where other technologies might not be feasible due to cost or logistical reasons. Continuous improvements in DSL technology are also ensuring better speeds and reliability, keeping it relevant in the market.

Fiber optic technology is the gold standard for internet connectivity, offering the fastest speeds and highest reliability. However, its deployment in rural areas has been slower due to high costs and the complexity of infrastructure development. Nonetheless, governments and private companies are increasingly investing in fiber optic networks even in rural areas, recognizing the long-term benefits of such an investment. The growing demand for high-speed internet in rural regions for applications like online education, telehealth, and streaming services is expected to drive further investments in fiber optic technology.

Fixed wireless technology is another promising segment,

Forecast: Households with Internet Access at Home in the US 2024 - 2028 Discover more data with ReportLinker!

This layer is no longer being actively maintained. For the latest broadband availability data from FCC, please see the FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC). This layer shows fixed broadband availability for every neighborhood in the U.S. and outlying areas for June 2023.This layer is a composite of five sublayers with adjacent scale ranges showing the broadband score across the U.S. and outlying areas, at five different geographies – State, County, Tract, Block Group and Block. The broadband score is an index based on the FCC’s minimum standard of broadband of 25 megabits per second (Mbps) download and 3 Mbps upload. A geography with speeds of 25/3 Mbps is awarded 100 points. Each type of geometry contains housing, population, and internet usage data taken from the following sources:US Census Bureau 2010 Census data (2010)USDA Non-Rural Areas (2013)FCC Form 477 Fixed Broadband Deployment Data (January - June 2021)FCC Population, Housing Unit, and Household Estimates (2019). Note that these are derived from Census and other data.Measurement Lab (Jan - June 2021)Broadband offering data from each provider for all geographies are available in related tables. Field Names / Record StructureThis layer includes over 150 attributes relating to reported speed and service information. In addition:Each block includes housing unit, household, and population estimates from the FCC.Each block has an attribute named WaterOnly that indicates if it is entirely water (yes/no).Each block has two attributes indicating whether it is urban or rural (CensusUrbanRural and USDAUrbanRural). For units larger than blocks, block count (urban/rural) was used to determine this. Some tracts and block groups have an equal number of urban and rural blocks—so a new coded value was introduced: S (split). All blocks are either U or R, while tracts and block groups can be U, R, or S.Each block has three attributes indicating whether it is part of a Tribal Block Group, is part of an American Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian Area (AIANNHA) and the AIANNHA name.US Census and USDA Rurality valuesAmalgamated broadband speed measurement categories based on Form 477. These include:99: All Terrestrial Broadband Plus Satellite98: All Terrestrial Broadband97: Cable Modem96: DSL95: All Other (Electric Power Line, Other Copper Wireline, Other)The FCC Speed Values method is applied to all speeds from all data sources within this service. This includes:Geography: State, County, Tract, Block Group, BlockData source: FCC and M-LabWithin this method, speed values are shown as such:<1 Mbps, reported up to three decimal points>= 1 and < 2 Mbps, rounded to the nearest tenth>= 2 and < 10 Mbps, truncated to the lower integer>= 10 and < 1000 Mbps, rounded to the nearest integer>= 1000 Mbps, the published bandwidth = 1000 MbpsEach sublayer has a varying number of attributes from these sources, depending on what data is available for the level of granularity. The following table displays what information is included with which geometry types: GeometryFCC Form 477 Fixed (Jan - Dec 2020)FCC Demographic Estimates (2019)M-Lab (Jan - Dec 2020)BroadbandNow Avg. Min. Terrestrial Broadband Plan PricesUrban/rural flags (Census and USDA)StateYesYesYesYesNoCountyYesYesYesYesNoTractYesYesNoYesYes (U, R, S)Block GroupYesYesNoYesYes (U, R, S)BlockYesYesNoYesYes (U, R) Additional ResourcesFCC Staff Block EstimatesFixed Broadband Deployment Data from FCC Form 477Digital Divide: Broadband Pricing by State, ZIP Code, and Income Level (BroadbandUSA)Open Internet Measurement (M-Lab)Eligibility Area Map Datasets (USDA)

The percentage of households that have both Home Broadband and Mobile Broadband subscriptions for each of New York City Public Use Microdata Areas. Data Limitations: Data accuracy is limited as of the date of publication and by the methodology and accuracy of the original sources. The City shall not be liable for any costs related to, or in reliance of, the data contained in these datasets.

PDF Map of FCC Form 477 provider reported maximum download speeds by census block for January - June 2020. This map seeks to highlight areas that are undeserved by terrestrial broadband (fiber/cable/dsl on the ground), with "underserved" defined as down/up speeds less than 25/3 Mbps.These data represent a static snapshot of provider reported coverage between January 2020 and June 2020. Maps also depict the locations of federally recognized tribes, Alaskan communities, ANCSA and borough boundaries.Broadband coverage is represented using provider reported speeds under the FCC Form 477 the amalgamated broadband speed measurement category based on Form 477 "All Terrestrial Broadband" as a proxy for coverage. This field is unique to the NBAM platform. These maps do not include satellite internet coverage (and may not include microwave coverage through the TERRA network for all connected areas).This map was produced by DCRA using data provided by NTIA through the NBAM platform as part of a joint data sharing agreement undertaken in the year 2021. Maps were produced using the feature layer "NBAM Data by Census Geography v4": https://maps.ntia.gov/arcgis/home/item.html?id=8068e420210542ba8d2b02c1c971fb20Coverage is symbolized using the following legend:No data avalible or no terrestrial coverage: Grey or transparent< 10 Mbps Maximum Reported Download: Red10-25 Mbps Maximum Reported Download: Orange25-50 Mbps Maximum Reported Download: Yellow50-100 Mbps Maximum Reported Download: Light Blue100-1000 Mbps Maximum Reported Download: Dark Blue_Description from layer "NBAM Data by Census Geography v4":This layer is a composite of seven sublayers with adjacent scale ranges: States, Counties, Census Tracts, Census Block Groups, Census Blocks, 100m Hexbins and 500m Hexbins. Each type of geometry contains demographic and internet usage data taken from the following sources: US Census Bureau 2010 Census data (2010) USDA Non-Rural Areas (2013) FCC Form 477 Fixed Broadband Deployment Data (Jan - Jun 2020) Ookla Consumer-Initiated Fixed Wi-Fi Speed Test Results (Jan - Jun 2020) FCC Population, Housing Unit, and Household Estimates (2019). Note that these are derived from Census and other data. BroadbandNow Average Minimum Terrestrial Broadband Plan Prices (2020) M-Lab (Jan - Jun 2020)Some data values are unique to the NBAM platform: US Census and USDA Rurality values. For units larger than blocks, block count (urban/rural) was used to determine this. Some tracts and block groups have an equal number of urban and rural blocks—so a new coded value was introduced: S (split). All blocks are either U or R, while tracts and block groups can be U, R, or S. Amalgamated broadband speed measurement categories based on Form 477. These include: 99: All Terrestrial Broadband Plus Satellite 98: All Terrestrial Broadband 97: Cable Modem 96: DSL 95: All Other (Electric Power Line, Other Copper Wireline, Other) Computed differences between FCC Form 477 and Ookla values for each area. These are reflected by six fields containing the difference of maximum, median, and minimum upload and download speed values.The FCC Speed Values method is applied to all speeds from all data sources within the custom-configured Omnibus service pop-up. This includes: Geography: State, County, Tract, Block Group, Block, Hex Bins geographies Data source: all data within the Omnibus, i.e. FCC, Ookla, M-Lab Representation: comparison tables and single speed values

The global average spend per capita in the 'Fixed Data' segment of the communication services market was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 4.6 U.S. dollars (+8.29 percent). After the eleventh consecutive increasing year, the average spend per capita is estimated to reach 60.05 U.S. dollars and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the average spend per capita of the 'Fixed Data' segment of the communication services market was continuously increasing over the past years.Find other key market indicators concerning the revenue and revenue growth. The Statista Market Insights cover a broad range of additional markets.

U.S. 5G Fixed Wireless Market size was valued at USD 12,052.98 Million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 135,361.56 Million by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 35.23% from 2026 to 2032.The U.S. 5G Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) market is emerging as a transformative segment within the broader telecommunications landscape. FWA uses 5G mobile network technology to deliver high-speed broadband internet to homes and businesses without the need for traditional wired infrastructure. This wireless approach offers a faster and more cost-effective solution for expanding internet access, particularly in rural and underserved areas where laying fiber-optic cables is economically challenging.Major U.S. telecom operators, including Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, and U.S. Cellular, are leading the charge in deploying 5G FWA services. Verizon and T-Mobile, in particular, have made significant inroads, with Verizon’s 5G Home and T-Mobile’s Home Internet now available to millions of households.

This layer is a composite of five sublayers with adjacent scale ranges showing the broadband score across the U.S. and outlying areas, at five different geographies – State, County, Tract, Block Group and Block. The broadband score is an index based on the FCC’s minimum standard of broadband of 25 megabits per second (Mbps) download and 3 Mbps upload. A geography with speeds of 25/3 Mbps is awarded 100 points. Each type of geometry contains housing, population, and internet usage data taken from the following sources:US Census Bureau 2010 Census data (2010)USDA Non-Rural Areas (2013)FCC Form 477 Fixed Broadband Deployment Data (January - June 2021)FCC Population, Housing Unit, and Household Estimates (2019). Note that these are derived from Census and other data.Measurement Lab (Jan - June 2021)Broadband offering data from each provider for all geographies are available in related tables. Field Names / Record StructureThis layer includes over 150 attributes relating to reported speed and service information. In addition:Each block includes housing unit, household, and population estimates from the FCC.Each block has an attribute named WaterOnly that indicates if it is entirely water (yes/no).Each block has two attributes indicating whether it is urban or rural (CensusUrbanRural and USDAUrbanRural). For units larger than blocks, block count (urban/rural) was used to determine this. Some tracts and block groups have an equal number of urban and rural blocks—so a new coded value was introduced: S (split). All blocks are either U or R, while tracts and block groups can be U, R, or S.Each block has three attributes indicating whether it is part of a Tribal Block Group, is part of an American Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian Area (AIANNHA) and the AIANNHA name.US Census and USDA Rurality valuesAmalgamated broadband speed measurement categories based on Form 477. These include:99: All Terrestrial Broadband Plus Satellite98: All Terrestrial Broadband97: Cable Modem96: DSL95: All Other (Electric Power Line, Other Copper Wireline, Other)The FCC Speed Values method is applied to all speeds from all data sources within this service. This includes:Geography: State, County, Tract, Block Group, BlockData source: FCC and M-LabWithin this method, speed values are shown as such:<1 Mbps, reported up to three decimal points>= 1 and < 2 Mbps, rounded to the nearest tenth>= 2 and < 10 Mbps, truncated to the lower integer>= 10 and < 1000 Mbps, rounded to the nearest integer>= 1000 Mbps, the published bandwidth = 1000 MbpsEach sublayer has a varying number of attributes from these sources, depending on what data is available for the level of granularity. The following table displays what information is included with which geometry types: GeometryFCC Form 477 Fixed (Jan - Dec 2020)FCC Demographic Estimates (2019)M-Lab (Jan - Dec 2020)BroadbandNow Avg. Min. Terrestrial Broadband Plan PricesUrban/rural flags (Census and USDA)StateYesYesYesYesNoCountyYesYesYesYesNoTractYesYesNoYesYes (U, R, S)Block GroupYesYesNoYesYes (U, R, S)BlockYesYesNoYesYes (U, R) Additional ResourcesFCC Staff Block EstimatesFixed Broadband Deployment Data from FCC Form 477Digital Divide: Broadband Pricing by State, ZIP Code, and Income Level (BroadbandUSA)Open Internet Measurement (M-Lab)Eligibility Area Map Datasets (USDA)If you encounter any issues with the "Export Data" option on this page, you can also download the source file geodatabase here.