100+ datasets found
  1. The Impacts of Working Remotely and in an Office

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Jun 20, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mohamed Elzeini (2023). The Impacts of Working Remotely and in an Office [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/ds/3368932
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jun 20, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Mohamed Elzeini
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    THE IMPACTS OF WORKING REMOTELY AND IN AN OFFICE

    Abstract: Working from home nowadays, particularly after COVID-19 hit the world, became the preferable choice for many employees because it gives flexibility and saves more time, according to them. However, many studies revealed that working from home caused a negative effect on many employees’ mental and physical health, such as isolation and back pain. The careless and unplanned way of living while working remotely, such as lack of socialization and equipment for a healthy home office, is the cause for that negative effect. In this paper, we explore the reasons that lead to the negative impact of working remotely on mental and physical health and investigate whether employees are aware of the negative and the positive effects of working either from home or in an office. Our investigation involved a questionnaire handed to hundred employees and revealed that the majority of them were aware of the negative and the positive impacts of working remotely and in an office and suggest, therefore, a mixed-mode of working to obtain the best advantages of both modes.

    Keywords: COVID-19; working from home; working in an office; questionnaire; advantages; disadvantages; negative impact; positive impact; mental health; physical health; work experience

    1. Introduction

    Who would not like to wake up late and avoid the traffic every morning? I always had dreamed of that, and I guess you too. Working from home, which provides these advantages, has become the preferred choice for many employees and employers for the sake of getting more flexibility, increasing productivity, and saving time and money (Ipsen et al., 2021). I have noticed, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, that many people switched willingly to work from home, expecting their life would totally improve. On the other hand, many people do not have the office work option. For instance, people work in the human resources, marketing, and customer service sectors (Iacurci, 2021). They work remotely until a hundred percent effective covid vaccine is developed. However, many studies, such as "Survey reveals the mental and physical health impacts of home working during Covid-19" by RSPH (2021), revealed that people who work from home are likely to suffer from mental and physical disorders.

    In fact, the reason for the negative impact is not the work from home. Rather, it is the unmanaged lifestyle that comes with working from home. Of course, many other jobs still need people to be physically present, such as working in hospitals and beauty centers. However, Iacurci (2021) suggests that people will work remotely even after the pandemic finishes and the economy reopens. While many people are switching to work from home, and many others hoping so, it might be an opportunity for them to know the negative impact of working remotely, such as isolation and back pain, due to lack of socialization and equipment for a healthy home office. I am not willing to tell people what they should do in order to work healthily from home because this is not my study field. However, because I have experienced that negative impact, I will only give hints about the consequences, which could happen if they did not take care of themselves when working from home. Thus, this research investigated hundred people who have already worked before, regardless of gender identity, whether they are aware of the negative and the positive impacts of working from home in order to take care of themselves.

    2. Literature review

    Reviewing Worker's and Employees' Opinions in Working from Home

    Before the COVID-19 pandemic, people could choose between working from home and in an office. However, many people are forced or got the opportunity to work from home to reduce the number of new daily infections during the pandemic. Thus, it was an opportunity for researchers to do research on a large number of people to figure out how working from home experience affected them. Also, after the pandemic is over, what would they prefer if they could choose between working remotely or being physically in an office.

    In the study, "Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19," Ipsen et al. (2021) investigated employees who have experience with working from home during the pandemic in 29 European countries. They used first the six key advantages and disadvantages approach, which involves the employees' opinions in working from home. Although the employees mentioned 16 disadvantages and 11 advantages, its results indicate that "the majority (55%) of employees were mostly positive about WFH" (p. 11). However, they assumed that maybe there are other circumstances that make the employees prefer working remotely over in an office. Hence, Ipsen et al. (2021) used the six factors approach, which involved the employees' lifestyle and characteristics. Its results also indicate that the majority of the employees preferred working remotely over in an office.

    Another study, "The impact of working from home during COVID-19 on work and life domains: an exploratory study on Hong Kong" by Vyas and Butakhieo (2021), indicates other findings. Vyas and Butakhieo (2021) stated that the employees in Hong Kong desired to work from home. However, after the COVID-19 pandemic, their study showed that the employees' opinions varied. Because the employees need time for mental relaxation and reducing the work stress, 80% "are suggesting a preference for a mixed-mode of working" (p. 69). However, another survey indicates that "68% of the workers missed going to the office and missed human interaction" (p. 69). The researchers illustrate the varying of the findings of the surveys is because some other factors are involving, such as family issues, looking after children, and difficulties in dealing with the new working from home situation, which revealed why Ipsen et al. (2021) involved in their study the characteristics of the employees.

    As a result, both research studies show various findings depending on the stages of the lookdown, the employees' circumstances, lifestyle, and job type. However, I should note that the research continues because the researchers found out that the opinions vary from time to time, and the future findings might vary from the findings at hand.

    3. Methods and materials

    This research paper required an investigation of people’s opinions regarding specific known impacts of working remotely and in an office. It also discussed the advantages and disadvantages of these work modes and, therefore, required people to respond to the questionnaire whether they were familiar with these impacts. In fact, I did not consider the participants’ gender identity because the effects of these work modes equally affect all genders. Also, I did not examine whether they experienced working from home because I needed to know whether the people who did not experience working from home were aware of the impacts and could take care of themselves when switching. Thus, quantitative is the ideal and most effective method for this research to collect the required data. It helps me measure their knowledge regarding the topic. Also, it helps me let the people who did not experience working from home participate in the questionnaire and express what they think about working from home and if they prefer to work remotely. Furthermore, it encourages the participants to participate in the questionnaire because it requires simple answers, which is easier for them.

    The questionnaire contained ten specific questions handed to hundred people and required simple answers as follows:

    First, yes and no questions: - Have you ever experienced working from home? - Do you think that working from home increases your work productivity? - Do you think that working from home prevents you from going out? - Do you think that working from home gives you more flexibility? - Do you think that working from home saves you more time? - Do you think that working from home prevents you from getting in contact with people?

    Second, the preferred work type, working from home or in an office, questions: - Which work type has the potential to cause you physical problems, such as the neck, back, and leg pain? - Which work type has the potential to cause mental disorders, such as stress, anxiety, and depression?
    - Which work type keeps you focused when working?

    Finally, the most preferred work type question: - Which work type do you prefer the most? a. Working from home b. Working in an office c. A mixed-mode of working

    4. Results

    Questionnaire results are as follows: 60% of the people, who have already worked before, have experienced working from home, and 40% did not. Concerning work productivity, 70% think that working from home increases their work productivity, and 30% do not. On the other hand, 60% of them suppose that working in an office keeps them focused while working. Of course, no one can deny that working from home gives us more flexibility. Thus, 100% of them agree on that. However, 60% think that working from home does not save them more time. Also, when it comes to going out and getting in contact with people, 70% of the participants think that working from home prevents them from practicing these activities. Regarding the physical and mental health impacts, 80% of them see that working from home could cause physical problems. Also, 70% think that working from home could cause mental disorders. Finally, 50% prefer a mixed-mode of working, 30% working in an office, and 20% working from home.

    You can find the results on BigQuery at the following link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FJ-hxv6KfcFmR777DmVCJsMuenMufeWmDewo0Vzp3-0/edit?usp=sharing

    5. Discussion

    In fact, the results in certain respects are somewhat surprising. It revealed that most of them are familiar with the negative and positive impacts of working remotely

  2. Remote Work Productivity

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Sep 9, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Muslimbek Abdurakhimov (2024). Remote Work Productivity [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/dsv/9350801
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Sep 9, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Muslimbek Abdurakhimov
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset contains synthetic data on productivity, working hours, and well-being indicators for remote and in-office workers. It aims to help analyze the impact of work environment on various productivity and well-being metrics.

  3. Share of employees working primarily remotely worldwide 2015-2023

    • statista.com
    • qajw.uu826.hkyousheng.com
    Updated Nov 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Share of employees working primarily remotely worldwide 2015-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1450450/employees-remote-work-share/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jul 2023 - Aug 2023
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    The trend of working remotely has been slowly increasing globally since 2015, with a one to three percent annual increase rate. However, the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 upended the world economy and global markets. Employment trends were no exception to this, with the share of employees working remotely increasing to some 27 percent in 2022 from just 13 percent two years prior. The industry with the highest share of remote workers globally in 2023 was by far the technology sector, with over 67 percent of tech employees worldwide working fully or mostly remotely. How are employers dealing with remote work? Many employers around the world have already adopted some remote work policies. According to IT industry leaders, reasons for remote work adoption ranged from a desire to broaden a company’s talent pool, increase productivity, and reduce costs from office equipment or real estate investments. Nonetheless, employers worldwide grappled with various concerns related to hybrid work. Among tech leaders, leading concerns included enabling effective collaboration and preserving organizational culture in hybrid work environments. Consequently, it’s unsurprising that maintaining organizational culture, fostering collaboration, and real estate investments emerged as key drivers for return-to-office mandates globally. However, these efforts were not without challenges. Notably, 21 percent of employers faced employee resistance to returning to the office, prompting a review of their remote work policies.

  4. D

    NSW Remote Working Survey

    • data.nsw.gov.au
    csv
    Updated Dec 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NSW Remote Working Survey [Dataset]. https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset/nsw-remote-working-survey
    Explore at:
    csv(2561959), csv(2482453)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    The Treasury
    Area covered
    New South Wales
    Description

    A survey of 1,500 NSW workers during August and September 2020 (2020 Remote Working Survey) and March and April 2021 (2021 Remote Working Survey), commissioned to understand workers' experiences of and attitudes to remote and hybrid working. To be eligible, respondents had to be employed NSW residents with experience of remote working in their current job. After accounting for unemployed people and those whose jobs cannot be done remotely—for example, dentists, cashiers and cleaners—the sample represents around 59 per cent of NSW workers. Workers answered questions on: • their attitudes to remote working • the amount of time they spent working remotely • their employers’ policies, practices, and attitudes • how they spent their time when working remotely • how barriers to remote working have changed • the barriers they faced to hybrid working • their expectations for future remote working

  5. b

    Work From Home Statistics 2023

    • boundlesshq.com
    Updated Jan 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Boundless Technologies Limited (2025). Work From Home Statistics 2023 [Dataset]. https://boundlesshq.com/work-from-home-statistics/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 29, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Boundless Technologies Limited
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    Do People want to Work from Home? To determine people's preferences for working from home, the office, or a combination of both, we surveyed 2,109 people in June 2023.

    We asked them: If you had the choice, ideally, where would you like to work from?

    We acknowledge that some roles do not accommodate remote working, such as positions in the hospitality industry or teaching roles that require being physically present in a school. Therefore, we provided respondents with the option to indicate that remote work doesn't apply to their roles.

    A total of 19.51% of people (394 respondents out of 2,109) indicated that the option of choosing a working location doesn't apply to their roles.

    We removed these respondents from our dataset to focus on those for whom the option does apply. Among the remaining 1,625 respondents, we obtained the following results:

    Ideally, where would you like to work from if it were your choice?

    • Exclusively from home or remotely: 27.45%
    • Mostly remote, but a day or two in the office: 18.03%
    • Half remote, half office: 17.66%
    • Exclusively from an office or workplace: 17.17%
    • Mostly in the office, but a day or two remote: 14.95%
    • Not sure: 4.74%
  6. g

    Remote Work & Mental Health

    • gts.ai
    json
    Updated Sep 25, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GTS (2024). Remote Work & Mental Health [Dataset]. https://gts.ai/dataset-download/remote-work-mental-health/
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 25, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    GLOBOSE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
    Authors
    GTS
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Explore a comprehensive dataset on remote work’s impact on mental health, stress, and job satisfaction across various industries.

  7. Remote work frequency before and after COVID-19 in the United States 2020

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Remote work frequency before and after COVID-19 in the United States 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1122987/change-in-remote-work-trends-after-covid-in-usa/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 7, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Apr 2020
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Before the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 17 percent of U.S. employees worked from home 5 days or more per week, a share that increased to 44 percent during the pandemic. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the remote working trend, as quarantines and lockdowns made commuting and working in an office close to impossible for millions around the world. Remote work, also called telework or working from home (WFH), provided a solution, with employees performing their roles away from the office supported by specialized technology, eliminating the commute to an office to remain connected with colleagues and clients. What enables working from home?

    To enable remote work, employees rely on a remote work arrangements that enable hybrid work and make it safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology supporting remote work including laptops saw a surge in demand, video conferencing companies such as Zoom jumped in value, and employers had to consider new communication techniques and resources. Is remote work the future of work?

    The response to COVID-19 has demonstrated that hybrid work models are not necessarily an impediment to productivity. For this reason, there is a general consensus that different remote work models will persist post-COVID-19. Many employers see benefits to flexible working arrangements, including positive results on employee wellness surveys, and potentially reducing office space. Many employees also plan on working from home more often, with 25 percent of respondents to a recent survey expecting remote work as a benefit of employment. As a result, it is of utmost importance to acknowledge any issues that may arise in this context to empower a hybrid workforce and ensure a smooth transition to more flexible work models.

  8. The Pandemic’s Impact on Remote Work & Where We Go From Here [Report]

    • hubstaff.com
    • hurenforen.org
    Updated Aug 20, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hubstaff (2020). The Pandemic’s Impact on Remote Work & Where We Go From Here [Report] [Dataset]. https://hubstaff.com/blog/state-of-remote-work-after-pandemic/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 20, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Hubstaffhttps://hubstaff.com/
    Time period covered
    Aug 2020
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The pandemic forced millions of people to change the way they work. Wherever possible, companies embraced remote work to keep their employees safe and their businesses open during shelter-in-place orders. Working remotely during a crisis is totally different, even for companies that were already distributed. Fear, stress, and distractions created a less-than-ideal work environment for the hundreds of thousands of people working from home for the first time.

  9. Remote Work & Mental Health

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Oct 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Iram Ramzan (2024). Remote Work & Mental Health [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/iramshahzadi9/remote-work-and-mental-health
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Oct 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Iram Ramzan
    Description

    As remote work becomes the new norm, it's essential to understand its impact on employees' mental well-being. This dataset dives into how working remotely affects stress levels, work-life balance, and mental health conditions across various industries and regions. With 5,000 records collected from employees worldwide, this dataset provides valuable insights into key areas like work location (remote, hybrid, onsite), stress levels, access to mental health resources, and job satisfaction. It’s designed to help researchers, HR professionals, and businesses assess the growing influence of remote work on productivity and well-being. 🌿📈 Column: Employee_ID: Unique identifier for each employee. Age: Age of the employee. Gender: Gender of the employee. Job_Role: Current role of the employee. Industry: Industry they work in. Work_Location: Whether they work remotely, hybrid, or onsite. Stress_Level: Their self-reported level of stress. Mental_Health_Condition: Any mental health condition reported (Anxiety, Depression, etc.). Social_Isolation_Rating: A self-reported rating (1-5) on how isolated they feel. Satisfaction_with_Remote_Work: How satisfied they are with remote work arrangements (Satisfied, Neutral, Unsatisfied).

  10. u

    Data from: Data and Code for: "Working Remotely? Selection, Treatment and...

    • iro.uiowa.edu
    • openicpsr.org
    Updated Sep 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Natalia Emanuel; Emma Harrington (2024). Data and Code for: "Working Remotely? Selection, Treatment and the Market for Remote Work" [Dataset]. https://iro.uiowa.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/Data-and-Code-for-Working-Remotely/9984701660102771
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research
    Authors
    Natalia Emanuel; Emma Harrington
    Time period covered
    2024
    Description

    Publicly available data and code for "Working Remotely? Selection, Treatment and the Market for Remote Work"How does remote work affect productivity and how productive are workers who choose remote jobs? We decompose these effects in a Fortune 500 firm. Before Covid-19, remote workers answered 12% fewer calls per hour than on-site workers. After the offices closed, the productivity gap narrowed by 4%, and formerly on-site workers’ call quality and promotion rates also declined. Even with everyone remote, an 8% productivity gap persisted, indicating negative selection into remote jobs. A cost-benefit analysis indicates that the savings from remote work in reducing turnover and office rents could outweigh remote work's negative productivity impact but not the costs of attracting less productive workers.

  11. Employees - remote working (NACE Rev. 1.1 activity)

    • data.europa.eu
    • data.wu.ac.at
    tsv, zip
    Updated May 31, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eurostat (2016). Employees - remote working (NACE Rev. 1.1 activity) [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/zhwwkeo1ub6mitt0hopq?locale=en
    Explore at:
    zip, tsvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Eurostathttps://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
    License

    http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/ojhttp://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/833/oj

    Description

    Employees - remote working (NACE Rev. 1.1 activity)

  12. C

    Remote Work Statistics By Productivity, Adoption And Benefits And Challenges...

    • coolest-gadgets.com
    Updated Jan 14, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Coolest Gadgets (2025). Remote Work Statistics By Productivity, Adoption And Benefits And Challenges [Dataset]. https://www.coolest-gadgets.com/remote-work-statistics/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 14, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Coolest Gadgets
    License

    https://www.coolest-gadgets.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.coolest-gadgets.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2022 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Introduction

    Remote Work Statistics: During the COVID pandemic, working from home became a requirement for many people. While some had already been working remotely, the pandemic made it more common for others to request it. Working from home has both positive and negative aspects. Some challenges include loneliness, spending more time indoors, and losing the chance to collaborate face-to-face. On the other hand, many people appreciate the extra time they gain from not having to commute and the money they save on travel.

    To get a clearer picture of the current work-from-home trends, we surveyed 2,019 people in the UK, analyzed Google searches for remote jobs in the UK and the USA, and reviewed studies from around the world. The result is this 2024 summary of Remote Work Statistics.

  13. Remote work success in the United States according to employers and...

    • statista.com
    • cstalvarietymarket.store
    Updated Jul 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Remote work success in the United States according to employers and employees 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1211650/employer-employee-view-remote-work-success/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 7, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Nov 24, 2020 - Dec 5, 2020
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    When asked whether remote work has been a success, 83 of employers agree, while only 73 percent of employees agree. This illustrates that the majority of respondents agree that remote work has been a success. Remote work refers to the practice of employees working from many different locations, relying on modern technologies to connect them to their coworkers.

  14. g

    Remote Work Productivity Dataset

    • gts.ai
    json
    Updated Oct 3, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GTS (2024). Remote Work Productivity Dataset [Dataset]. https://gts.ai/dataset-download/remote-work-productivity-dataset/
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    GLOBOSE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
    Authors
    GTS
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Explore our detailed synthetic dataset on remote and in-office work productivity, work hours, and well-being indicators.

  15. Data from: The Short-Term Economic Consequences of COVID-19: Exposure to...

    • osf.io
    Updated Aug 5, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Abel Brodeur; Taylor Wright; Louis-Philippe Beland (2022). The Short-Term Economic Consequences of COVID-19: Exposure to Disease, Remote Work and Government Response [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C28T5
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 5, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Center for Open Sciencehttps://cos.io/
    Authors
    Abel Brodeur; Taylor Wright; Louis-Philippe Beland
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In this ongoing project, we examine the short-term consequences of COVID-19 on employment and wages in the United States. Guided by a pre-analysis plan, we document the impact of COVID-19 at the national-level using a simple difference and test whether states with relatively more confirmed cases/deaths were more affected. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 increased the unemployment rate, decreased hours of work and labor force participation and had no significant impacts on wages. The negative impacts on labor market outcomes are larger for men, younger workers, Hispanics and less-educated workers. This suggest that COVID-19 increases labor market inequalities. We also investigate whether the economic consequences of this pandemic were larger for certain occupations. We built three indexes using ACS and O*NET data: workers relatively more exposed to disease, workers that work with proximity to coworkers and workers who can easily work remotely. Our estimates suggest that individuals in occupations working in proximity to others are more affected while occupations able to work remotely are less affected. We also find that occupations classified as more exposed to disease are less affected, possibly due to the large number of essential workers in these occupations.

  16. Remote Workplace Services Market Size Global Report, 2022 - 2030

    • polarismarketresearch.com
    Updated Nov 11, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Remote Workplace Services Market Size Global Report, 2022 - 2030 [Dataset]. https://www.polarismarketresearch.com/industry-analysis/remote-workplace-services-market
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 11, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Polaris Market Research
    License

    https://www.polarismarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.polarismarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Description

    The global remote workplace services market was valued at USD 16.56 billion in 2021 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 23.4% during the forecast period.

  17. Global Remote Work Software Market Size By Type (Cloud, On-Premises), By...

    • verifiedmarketresearch.com
    Updated Jun 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    VERIFIED MARKET RESEARCH (2023). Global Remote Work Software Market Size By Type (Cloud, On-Premises), By Organization Size (Large Enterprises, SMEs), By End-Users (BFSI, Manufacturing), By Geographic Scope And Forecast [Dataset]. https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/remote-work-software-market-size/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Verified Market Researchhttps://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/
    Authors
    VERIFIED MARKET RESEARCH
    License

    https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2031
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Remote Work Software Market size was valued at USD 2.09 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 4.83 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 9.71% during the forecast period 2024-2031.

    The use of chat, the internet, files, emails, and other activity on a worker’s computer screen can all be recorded and observed using employee monitoring software. Departmental supervisors can monitor and control the computers used by their teams due to the system’s tiered management structure. When big businesses hire new workers, they have to figure out a way to make sure they get the supervision, instruction, and help they need straight away. That may seem a little unusual for employee monitoring equipment, but it shows that there are many different applications for these products.

    These products are designed to guarantee that businesses get the productivity they expect from their employees. Additionally, they aid in the enforcement of data security policies and laws, which are more important than ever now that the workforce that manages and maintains company data is spread as well. Agents for employee monitoring that are installed on business computers offer complete visibility and activity tracing, especially for large companies that schedule hundreds of shift workers in places like call centers, for example. Agents that monitor employees also generate critical productivity data

  18. Security Tips for Organizations With Remote Workers (ITSAP.10.016)

    • open.canada.ca
    • ouvert.canada.ca
    html
    Updated Mar 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Communications Security Establishment Canada (2023). Security Tips for Organizations With Remote Workers (ITSAP.10.016) [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/5c990970-43ce-416e-8c38-6a233c61da52
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Communications Security Establishment Canadahttps://cyber.gc.ca/en/
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Remote work introduces some challenges when trying to balance functionality with security. When working remotely, your employees need to access the same internal services, applications, and information that they would have access to in the office. However, your organization also needs to protect its systems and information, as remote work introduces new vulnerabilities. You need to implement additional security precautions to prevent threat actors from taking advantage of those vulnerabilities.

  19. U.S. employees preferred communication channel 2023, by work location

    • cstalvarietymarket.store
    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, U.S. employees preferred communication channel 2023, by work location [Dataset]. https://cstalvarietymarket.store/?_=%2Fstatistics%2F1407415%2Fus-office-worker-top-communication-method-by-location%2F%23QUMGHTZ8aqvN223v5R2KXEBEBgxrJSrp
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    According to a March 2023 survey of office workers carried out in the United States, 34 percent of on-site employees preferred to communicate via in-person conversations. In comparison, remote workers preferred e-mail, with 25 percent of respondents indicating this communication channel as their favorite. Emails were also the preferred communication method among employees in a hybrid setting, followed by direct messaging, and audio calls.

  20. Remote Work Security Market Share, Size, Report Outlook 2024-2032

    • polarismarketresearch.com
    Updated Mar 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Polaris Market Research (2024). Remote Work Security Market Share, Size, Report Outlook 2024-2032 [Dataset]. https://www.polarismarketresearch.com/industry-analysis/remote-work-security-market
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 4, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Polaris Market Research
    License

    https://www.polarismarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.polarismarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Description

    The global remote work security market is expected to reach a powerful growth of USD 269.28 billion by 2032, driven by a projected CAGR of 20.8%

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Mohamed Elzeini (2023). The Impacts of Working Remotely and in an Office [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/ds/3368932
Organization logo

The Impacts of Working Remotely and in an Office

Explore at:
CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
Dataset updated
Jun 20, 2023
Dataset provided by
Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
Authors
Mohamed Elzeini
License

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

THE IMPACTS OF WORKING REMOTELY AND IN AN OFFICE

Abstract: Working from home nowadays, particularly after COVID-19 hit the world, became the preferable choice for many employees because it gives flexibility and saves more time, according to them. However, many studies revealed that working from home caused a negative effect on many employees’ mental and physical health, such as isolation and back pain. The careless and unplanned way of living while working remotely, such as lack of socialization and equipment for a healthy home office, is the cause for that negative effect. In this paper, we explore the reasons that lead to the negative impact of working remotely on mental and physical health and investigate whether employees are aware of the negative and the positive effects of working either from home or in an office. Our investigation involved a questionnaire handed to hundred employees and revealed that the majority of them were aware of the negative and the positive impacts of working remotely and in an office and suggest, therefore, a mixed-mode of working to obtain the best advantages of both modes.

Keywords: COVID-19; working from home; working in an office; questionnaire; advantages; disadvantages; negative impact; positive impact; mental health; physical health; work experience

1. Introduction

Who would not like to wake up late and avoid the traffic every morning? I always had dreamed of that, and I guess you too. Working from home, which provides these advantages, has become the preferred choice for many employees and employers for the sake of getting more flexibility, increasing productivity, and saving time and money (Ipsen et al., 2021). I have noticed, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, that many people switched willingly to work from home, expecting their life would totally improve. On the other hand, many people do not have the office work option. For instance, people work in the human resources, marketing, and customer service sectors (Iacurci, 2021). They work remotely until a hundred percent effective covid vaccine is developed. However, many studies, such as "Survey reveals the mental and physical health impacts of home working during Covid-19" by RSPH (2021), revealed that people who work from home are likely to suffer from mental and physical disorders.

In fact, the reason for the negative impact is not the work from home. Rather, it is the unmanaged lifestyle that comes with working from home. Of course, many other jobs still need people to be physically present, such as working in hospitals and beauty centers. However, Iacurci (2021) suggests that people will work remotely even after the pandemic finishes and the economy reopens. While many people are switching to work from home, and many others hoping so, it might be an opportunity for them to know the negative impact of working remotely, such as isolation and back pain, due to lack of socialization and equipment for a healthy home office. I am not willing to tell people what they should do in order to work healthily from home because this is not my study field. However, because I have experienced that negative impact, I will only give hints about the consequences, which could happen if they did not take care of themselves when working from home. Thus, this research investigated hundred people who have already worked before, regardless of gender identity, whether they are aware of the negative and the positive impacts of working from home in order to take care of themselves.

2. Literature review

Reviewing Worker's and Employees' Opinions in Working from Home

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, people could choose between working from home and in an office. However, many people are forced or got the opportunity to work from home to reduce the number of new daily infections during the pandemic. Thus, it was an opportunity for researchers to do research on a large number of people to figure out how working from home experience affected them. Also, after the pandemic is over, what would they prefer if they could choose between working remotely or being physically in an office.

In the study, "Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19," Ipsen et al. (2021) investigated employees who have experience with working from home during the pandemic in 29 European countries. They used first the six key advantages and disadvantages approach, which involves the employees' opinions in working from home. Although the employees mentioned 16 disadvantages and 11 advantages, its results indicate that "the majority (55%) of employees were mostly positive about WFH" (p. 11). However, they assumed that maybe there are other circumstances that make the employees prefer working remotely over in an office. Hence, Ipsen et al. (2021) used the six factors approach, which involved the employees' lifestyle and characteristics. Its results also indicate that the majority of the employees preferred working remotely over in an office.

Another study, "The impact of working from home during COVID-19 on work and life domains: an exploratory study on Hong Kong" by Vyas and Butakhieo (2021), indicates other findings. Vyas and Butakhieo (2021) stated that the employees in Hong Kong desired to work from home. However, after the COVID-19 pandemic, their study showed that the employees' opinions varied. Because the employees need time for mental relaxation and reducing the work stress, 80% "are suggesting a preference for a mixed-mode of working" (p. 69). However, another survey indicates that "68% of the workers missed going to the office and missed human interaction" (p. 69). The researchers illustrate the varying of the findings of the surveys is because some other factors are involving, such as family issues, looking after children, and difficulties in dealing with the new working from home situation, which revealed why Ipsen et al. (2021) involved in their study the characteristics of the employees.

As a result, both research studies show various findings depending on the stages of the lookdown, the employees' circumstances, lifestyle, and job type. However, I should note that the research continues because the researchers found out that the opinions vary from time to time, and the future findings might vary from the findings at hand.

3. Methods and materials

This research paper required an investigation of people’s opinions regarding specific known impacts of working remotely and in an office. It also discussed the advantages and disadvantages of these work modes and, therefore, required people to respond to the questionnaire whether they were familiar with these impacts. In fact, I did not consider the participants’ gender identity because the effects of these work modes equally affect all genders. Also, I did not examine whether they experienced working from home because I needed to know whether the people who did not experience working from home were aware of the impacts and could take care of themselves when switching. Thus, quantitative is the ideal and most effective method for this research to collect the required data. It helps me measure their knowledge regarding the topic. Also, it helps me let the people who did not experience working from home participate in the questionnaire and express what they think about working from home and if they prefer to work remotely. Furthermore, it encourages the participants to participate in the questionnaire because it requires simple answers, which is easier for them.

The questionnaire contained ten specific questions handed to hundred people and required simple answers as follows:

First, yes and no questions: - Have you ever experienced working from home? - Do you think that working from home increases your work productivity? - Do you think that working from home prevents you from going out? - Do you think that working from home gives you more flexibility? - Do you think that working from home saves you more time? - Do you think that working from home prevents you from getting in contact with people?

Second, the preferred work type, working from home or in an office, questions: - Which work type has the potential to cause you physical problems, such as the neck, back, and leg pain? - Which work type has the potential to cause mental disorders, such as stress, anxiety, and depression?
- Which work type keeps you focused when working?

Finally, the most preferred work type question: - Which work type do you prefer the most? a. Working from home b. Working in an office c. A mixed-mode of working

4. Results

Questionnaire results are as follows: 60% of the people, who have already worked before, have experienced working from home, and 40% did not. Concerning work productivity, 70% think that working from home increases their work productivity, and 30% do not. On the other hand, 60% of them suppose that working in an office keeps them focused while working. Of course, no one can deny that working from home gives us more flexibility. Thus, 100% of them agree on that. However, 60% think that working from home does not save them more time. Also, when it comes to going out and getting in contact with people, 70% of the participants think that working from home prevents them from practicing these activities. Regarding the physical and mental health impacts, 80% of them see that working from home could cause physical problems. Also, 70% think that working from home could cause mental disorders. Finally, 50% prefer a mixed-mode of working, 30% working in an office, and 20% working from home.

You can find the results on BigQuery at the following link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FJ-hxv6KfcFmR777DmVCJsMuenMufeWmDewo0Vzp3-0/edit?usp=sharing

5. Discussion

In fact, the results in certain respects are somewhat surprising. It revealed that most of them are familiar with the negative and positive impacts of working remotely

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu