Map showing current and future road classifications for the City of Bozeman.

This feature service contains data from the American Community Survey: 5-year Estimates Subject Tables for Gallatin County, MT. The attributes come from the Educational Attainment table (S1501). Processing Notes:Data was downloaded from the U.S. Census Bureau and imported into FME to create an AGOL Feature Service. Each attribute has been given an abbreviated alias name derived from the American Community Survey (ACS) categorical descriptions. The Data Dictionary below includes all given ACS attribute name aliases.For Example: PctPop_45to64_HS is equal to the percentage of the population ages 45 to 64 with the educational attainment of a high school degree or equivalentData DictionaryACS_EST_YR: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate Subject Tables data yearGEO_ID: Census Bureau geographic identifierNAME: Specified geographyPctPop: Percent of the selected populationRace/Ethnicity:A: AsianAIAN: American Indian or Alaska NativeBAA: Black or African AmericanHL: Hispanic or LatinoNHPI: Native Hawaiian or other Pacific IslanderW: WhiteOther: Some other raceTwo: Two or more racesAge Group:18to24: Ages 18 to 24 years old25to34: Ages 25 to 34 years old35to44: Ages 35 to 44 years old45to64: Ages 45 to 64 years old65andover: Ages 65 and overEducational AttainmentBA: Bachelor's degree or higherHS: High school graduate (includes equivalency)Download ACS Educational Attainment data for Gallatin County, MT areaAdditional LinksU.S. Census BureauU.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS)About the American Community Survey

These tools were created by Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) with extensive input from the Gallatin County Planning Department as part of the Gallatin County Growth Policy update in 2020. The map and associated matrix do not prescribe where development should or should not occur but instead provide general guidance on how to consider fish and wildlife resources on privately-owned lands within the jurisdiction of Gallatin County. This map is based on the best available data and professional knowledge of FWP biologists at the time the map was created. Because this guidance is general and the landscape is rapidly changing, land use planners, developers, and conservation professionals should continue to consult with FWP staff and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on plans and projects. In general, the wildlife value boundaries drawn on the map are located on identifiable landmarks for ease and logistics and the user should recognize that these boundaries are approximate, and that wildlife habitats and use do not necessarily change on that line. All water bodies across the county are considered core wildlife habitat but due to scale, not all are shown on this map. Wildlife resource matrix: https://fwp.mt.gov/binaries/content/assets/fwp/gisresources/docs/gallatincountyplanningmaps/wildlifematrix.pdf . PDF maps: https://fwp.mt.gov/binaries/content/assets/fwp/gisresources/docs/gallatincountyplanningmaps/gallatincounty_fwp_wildliferesourcevalue_north_final_ud20210505.pdf , https://fwp.mt.gov/binaries/content/assets/fwp/gisresources/docs/gallatincountyplanningmaps/gallatincounty_fwp_wildliferesourcevalue_south_final_ud20210505.pdfModel Methods:1. Extracts layer areas only within the study area. 2. Adds an empty field for the wildlife score. 3. Calculates a score in the wildlife score field from 1 (lowest) to 3 (highest) for each attribute as described in the attribute selection column.

Montana lands with conservation easements. This layer shows private lands parcels on which a public agency or qualified Land Trust has placed a Conservation Easement in cooperation with the land owner. According to State Law (Montana Code Annotated 76-6-207) easements must be recorded in the county where the land lies. The county clerk and recorder shall provide a copy of the conservation easement to the Department of Revenue office in that county within 30 days. The Montana Department of Revenue updates this dataset typically once a month.

Map features in this data set are not intended as a legal depiction of public or private surface land ownership boundaries and should not be used in place of a survey conducted by a licensed land surveyor. The data are derived from the Montana Cadastral parcel layer.

This map forms part of the Montana State Geological Map.

The Ennis 1:100,000 quadrangle lies within both the Laramide (Late Cretaceous to early Tertiary) foreland province of southwestern Montana and the northeastern margin of the middle to late Tertiary Basin and Range province.

The oldest rocks in the quadrangle are Archean high-grade gneiss, and granitic to ultramafic intrusive rocks that are as old as about 3.0 Ga. The gneiss includes a supracrustal assemblage of quartz-feldspar gneiss, amphibolite, quartzite, and biotite schist and gneiss. The basement rocks are overlain by a platform sequence of sedimentary rocks as old as Cambrian Flathead Quartzite and as young as Upper Cretaceous Livingston Group sandstones, shales, and volcanic rocks.

The Archean crystalline rocks crop out in the cores of large basement uplifts, most notably the "Madison-Gravelly arch" that includes parts of the present Tobacco Root Mountains and the Gravelly, Madison, and Gallatin Ranges. These basement uplifts or blocks were thrust westward during the Laramide orogeny over rocks as young as Upper Cretaceous. The thrusts are now exposed in the quadrangle along the western flanks of the Gravelly and Madison Ranges (the Greenhorn thrust and the Hilgard fault system, respectively). Simultaneous with the west-directed thrusting, northwest-striking, northeast-side-up reverse faults formed a parallel set across southwestern Montana; the largest of these is the Spanish Peaks fault, which cuts prominently across the Ennis quadrangle.

Beginning in late Eocene time, extensive volcanism of the Absorka Volcanic Supergroup covered large parts of the area; large remnants of the volcanic field remain in the eastern part of the quadrangle. The volcanism was concurrent with, and followed by, middle Tertiary extension. During this time, the axial zone of the "Madison-Gravelly arch," a large Laramide uplift, collapsed, forming the Madison Valley, structurally a complex down-to-the-east half graben. Basin deposits as thick as 4,500 m filled the graben.

Pleistocene glaciers sculpted the high peaks of the mountain ranges and formed the present rugged topography.

Compilation scale is 1:100,000. Geology mapped between 1988 and 1995. Compilation completed 1997. Review and revision completed 1997. Archive files prepared 1998-02.

To view metadata and source links for data download, see the Gallatin Sensitive Lands Protection Plan Report Appendix C Part 2 Descriptions of Model Inputs and Processing. To view the item details for a specific model input or map layer, scroll down to find the name of the layer.Layers labeled as "old" are no longer maintained in this geodatabase and are not used in any Plan reports, maps, or other materials.

This layer was used in maps found in the report for the Gallatin Valley Sensitive Lands Plan.

Map showing street maintenance and responsibility

This layer used in maps found in the report for the Gallatin Valley Sensitive Lands Plan.

This layer was used in maps found in the report for the Gallatin Valley Sensitive Lands Plan.

This layer was used in maps found in the report for the Gallatin Valley Sensitive Lands Plan.

The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) is a comprehensive aggregated collection of hydrologic unit data consistent with the national criteria for delineation and resolution. It defines the areal extent of surface water drainage to a point except in coastal or lake front areas where there could be multiple outlets as stated by the "Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD)" “Standard” (https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/). Watershed boundaries are determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative boundaries or special projects, nor particular program or agency. This dataset represents the hydrologic unit boundaries to the 12-digit (6th level) for the entire United States. Some areas may also include additional subdivisions representing the 14- and 16-digit hydrologic unit (HU). At a minimum, the HUs are delineated at 1:24,000-scale in the conterminous United States, 1:25,000-scale in Hawaii, Pacific basin and the Caribbean, and 1:63,360-scale in Alaska, meeting the National Map Accuracy Standards (NMAS). Higher resolution boundaries are being developed where partners and data exist and will be incorporated back into the WBD. WBD data are delivered as a dataset of polygons and corresponding lines that define the boundary of the polygon. WBD polygon attributes include hydrologic unit codes (HUC), size (in the form of acres and square kilometers), name, downstream hydrologic unit code, type of watershed, non-contributing areas, and flow modifications. The HUC describes where the unit is in the country and the level of the unit. WBD line attributes contain the highest level of hydrologic unit for each boundary, line source information and flow modifications.

This feature layer contains high school graduation rate data disaggregated by race for Gallatin County, MT sourced from the Growth and Enhancement of Montana Students (GEMS) interactive dashboard.Processing NotesData is retrieved from the GEMS interactive dashboard and imported into FME to create an AGOL Feature Service.No data present is an indication that the demographic has a count of 5 or fewer students and the information has been masked.Download Montana County's Graduation Rate dataAdditional LinksGrowth & Enhancement of Montana Students (GEMS)Navigation Guide for GEMS

Model Methods:

The Water Quality and Quantity results data are published here: https://bzn-community.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=9c4d1476b23b45cf9ffee06217a7acadThis layer displays the results of the water quality and quantity sensitivity model, which consists of an overall sensitivity score calculated by summing all scores assigned to each input layer, where higher scores indicate areas with either a larger diversity of layers or higher individual scoring for data present in the area.

The Connectivity results data are published here: https://bzn-community.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=e849cae2926d4e8280d04fd595a1b5ffThis layer displays the results of the connectivity sensitivity model, which consists of an overall sensitivity score calculated by summing all scores assigned to each input layer, where higher scores indicate areas with either a larger diversity of layers or higher individual scoring for data present in the area.

Data showing pothole repairs completed by the City of Bozeman from 2014-2017

The wildlife and biodiversity results data are published here: https://bzn-community.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=60f66fbc129443e4944bb47fe6b9fcc5This layer displays the results of the wildlife and biodiversity sensitivity model, which consists of an overall sensitivity score calculated by summing all scores assigned to each input layer, where higher scores indicate areas with either a larger diversity of layers or higher individual scoring for data present in the area.

The planning projects data shows boundaries and locations of current development around the City of Bozeman.