Dataset for Linear Regression with two Independent variables and one Dependent variable. Focused on Testing, Visualization and Statistical Analysis. The dataset is synthetic and contains 100 instances.

China is one of the countries hardest hit by disasters. Disaster shocks not only cause a large number of casualties and property damage but also have an impact on the risk preference of those who experience it. Current research has not reached a consensus conclusion on the impact of risk preferences. This paper empirically analyzes the effects of natural and man-made disasters on residents’ risk preference based on the data of the China Household Financial Survey (CHFS) in 2019. The results indicate that: (1) Both natural and man-made disasters can significantly lead to an increase in the risk aversion of residents, and man-made disasters have a greater impact. (2) Education background plays a negative moderating role in the impact of man-made disasters on residents’ risk preference. (3) Natural disaster experiences have a greater impact on the risk preference of rural residents, while man-made disaster experiences have a greater impact on the risk preference of urban residents. Natural disaster experiences make rural residents more risk-averse, while man-made disaster experiences make urban residents more risk-averse. The results provide new evidence and perspective on the negative impact of disaster shocks on the social life of residents.

This paper explores a unique dataset of all the SET ratings provided by students of one university in Poland at the end of the winter semester of the 2020/2021 academic year. The SET questionnaire used by this university is presented in Appendix 1. The dataset is unique for several reasons. It covers all SET surveys filled by students in all fields and levels of study offered by the university. In the period analysed, the university was entirely in the online regime amid the Covid-19 pandemic. While the expected learning outcomes formally have not been changed, the online mode of study could have affected the grading policy and could have implications for some of the studied SET biases. This Covid-19 effect is captured by econometric models and discussed in the paper. The average SET scores were matched with the characteristics of the teacher for degree, seniority, gender, and SET scores in the past six semesters; the course characteristics for time of day, day of the week, course type, course breadth, class duration, and class size; the attributes of the SET survey responses as the percentage of students providing SET feedback; and the grades of the course for the mean, standard deviation, and percentage failed. Data on course grades are also available for the previous six semesters. This rich dataset allows many of the biases reported in the literature to be tested for and new hypotheses to be formulated, as presented in the introduction section. The unit of observation or the single row in the data set is identified by three parameters: teacher unique id (j), course unique id (k) and the question number in the SET questionnaire (n ϵ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9} ). It means that for each pair (j,k), we have nine rows, one for each SET survey question, or sometimes less when students did not answer one of the SET questions at all. For example, the dependent variable SET_score_avg(j,k,n) for the triplet (j=Calculus, k=John Smith, n=2) is calculated as the average of all Likert-scale answers to question nr 2 in the SET survey distributed to all students that took the Calculus course taught by John Smith. The data set has 8,015 such observations or rows. The full list of variables or columns in the data set included in the analysis is presented in the attached filesection. Their description refers to the triplet (teacher id = j, course id = k, question number = n). When the last value of the triplet (n) is dropped, it means that the variable takes the same values for all n ϵ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}.Two attachments:- word file with variables description- Rdata file with the data set (for R language).Appendix 1. Appendix 1. The SET questionnaire was used for this paper. Evaluation survey of the teaching staff of [university name] Please, complete the following evaluation form, which aims to assess the lecturer’s performance. Only one answer should be indicated for each question. The answers are coded in the following way: 5- I strongly agree; 4- I agree; 3- Neutral; 2- I don’t agree; 1- I strongly don’t agree. Questions 1 2 3 4 5 I learnt a lot during the course. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ I think that the knowledge acquired during the course is very useful. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The professor used activities to make the class more engaging. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ If it was possible, I would enroll for the course conducted by this lecturer again. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The classes started on time. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The lecturer always used time efficiently. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The lecturer delivered the class content in an understandable and efficient way. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The lecturer was available when we had doubts. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The lecturer treated all students equally regardless of their race, background and ethnicity. ○ ○

Descriptive statistics for (non-trasformed) model variables over the whole dataset under analysis.

Public Health Indicators in Chicago

Natality, Mortality, Infectious Disease, Lead Poisoning and Economic Status

By City of Chicago [source]

About this dataset

This public health dataset contains a comprehensive selection of indicators related to natality, mortality, infectious disease, lead poisoning, and economic status from Chicago community areas. It is an invaluable resource for those interested in understanding the current state of public health within each area in order to identify any deficiencies or areas of improvement needed.

The data includes 27 indicators such as birth and death rates, prenatal care beginning in first trimester percentages, preterm birth rates, breast cancer incidences per hundred thousand female population, all-sites cancer rates per hundred thousand population and more. For each indicator provided it details the geographical region so that analyses can be made regarding trends on a local level. Furthermore this dataset allows various stakeholders to measure performance along these indicators or even compare different community areas side-by-side.

This dataset provides a valuable tool for those striving toward better public health outcomes for the citizens of Chicago's communities by allowing greater insight into trends specific to geographic regions that could potentially lead to further research and implementation practices based on empirical evidence gathered from this comprehensive yet digestible selection of indicators

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

In order to use this dataset effectively to assess the public health of a given area or areas in the city: - Understand which data is available: The list of data included in this dataset can be found above. It is important to know all that are included as well as their definitions so that accurate conclusions can be made when utilizing the data for research or analysis. - Identify areas of interest: Once you are familiar with what type of data is present it can help to identify which community areas you would like to study more closely or compare with one another. - Choose your variables: Once you have identified your areas it will be helpful to decide which variables are most relevant for your studies and research specific questions regarding these variables based on what you are trying to learn from this data set.
- Analyze the Data : Once your variables have been selected and clarified take right into analyzing the corresponding values across different community areas using statistical tests such as t-tests or correlations etc.. This will help answer questions like “Are there significant differences between two outputs?” allowing you to compare how different Chicago Community Areas stack up against each other with regards to public health statistics tracked by this dataset!

Research Ideas

• Creating interactive maps that show data on public health indicators by Chicago community area to allow users to explore the data more easily.
• Designing a machine learning model to predict future variations in public health indicators by Chicago community area such as birth rate, preterm births, and childhood lead poisoning levels.
• Developing an app that enables users to search for public health information in their own community areas and compare with other areas within the city or across different cities in the US

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

See the dataset description for more information.

Columns

File: public-health-statistics-selected-public-health-indicators-by-chicago-community-area-1.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Community Area | Unique identifier for each community area in Chicago. (Integer) | | Community Area Name | Name of the community area in Chicago. (String) | | Birth Rate | Number of live births per 1,000 population. (Float) | | General Fertility Rate | Number of live births per 1,000 women aged 15-44. (Float) ...

Home Value Insights: A Beginner's Regression Dataset

This dataset is designed for beginners to practice regression problems, particularly in the context of predicting house prices. It contains 1000 rows, with each row representing a house and various attributes that influence its price. The dataset is well-suited for learning basic to intermediate-level regression modeling techniques.

Features:

1. Square_Footage: The size of the house in square feet. Larger homes typically have higher prices.
2. Num_Bedrooms: The number of bedrooms in the house. More bedrooms generally increase the value of a home.
3. Num_Bathrooms: The number of bathrooms in the house. Houses with more bathrooms are typically priced higher.
4. Year_Built: The year the house was built. Older houses may be priced lower due to wear and tear.
5. Lot_Size: The size of the lot the house is built on, measured in acres. Larger lots tend to add value to a property.
6. Garage_Size: The number of cars that can fit in the garage. Houses with larger garages are usually more expensive.
7. Neighborhood_Quality: A rating of the neighborhood’s quality on a scale of 1-10, where 10 indicates a high-quality neighborhood. Better neighborhoods usually command higher prices.
8. House_Price (Target Variable): The price of the house, which is the dependent variable you aim to predict.

Potential Uses:

1. Beginner Regression Projects: This dataset can be used to practice building regression models such as Linear Regression, Decision Trees, or Random Forests. The target variable (house price) is continuous, making this an ideal problem for supervised learning techniques.

2. Feature Engineering Practice: Learners can create new features by combining existing ones, such as the price per square foot or age of the house, providing an opportunity to experiment with feature transformations.

3. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA): You can explore how different features (e.g., square footage, number of bedrooms) correlate with the target variable, making it a great dataset for learning about data visualization and summary statistics.

4. Model Evaluation: The dataset allows for various model evaluation techniques such as cross-validation, R-squared, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). These metrics can be used to compare the effectiveness of different models.

Versatility:

• The dataset is highly versatile for a range of machine learning tasks. You can apply simple linear models to predict house prices based on one or two features, or use more complex models like Random Forest or Gradient Boosting Machines to understand interactions between variables.

• It can also be used for dimensionality reduction techniques like PCA or to practice handling categorical variables (e.g., neighborhood quality) through encoding techniques like one-hot encoding.

• This dataset is ideal for anyone wanting to gain practical experience in building regression models while working with real-world features.

Housing statistics on routes 1 000 m X 1 000 m for all historical vintages from 2008 to current. Newer vintages available in multiple formats. The data sets contain statistics on the number of dwellings and related variables as of January 1st. Housing statistics on routes belong to the theme group “Building/Residentials” in Statistics Norway’s product group “Statistics on grids”. In the same Theme group there is also the data set Building mass statistics on routes Other themes are created grid datasets for are “Population”, “Business”, and “Earth, Forest, Hunting and Fisheries”

Abstract

The harmonized data set on health, created and published by the ERF, is a subset of Iraq Household Socio Economic Survey (IHSES) 2012. It was derived from the household, individual and health modules, collected in the context of the above mentioned survey. The sample was then used to create a harmonized health survey, comparable with the Iraq Household Socio Economic Survey (IHSES) 2007 micro data set.

----> Overview of the Iraq Household Socio Economic Survey (IHSES) 2012:

Iraq is considered a leader in household expenditure and income surveys where the first was conducted in 1946 followed by surveys in 1954 and 1961. After the establishment of Central Statistical Organization, household expenditure and income surveys were carried out every 3-5 years in (1971/ 1972, 1976, 1979, 1984/ 1985, 1988, 1993, 2002 / 2007). Implementing the cooperation between CSO and WB, Central Statistical Organization (CSO) and Kurdistan Region Statistics Office (KRSO) launched fieldwork on IHSES on 1/1/2012. The survey was carried out over a full year covering all governorates including those in Kurdistan Region.

The survey has six main objectives. These objectives are:

1. Provide data for poverty analysis and measurement and monitor, evaluate and update the implementation Poverty Reduction National Strategy issued in 2009.
2. Provide comprehensive data system to assess household social and economic conditions and prepare the indicators related to the human development.
3. Provide data that meet the needs and requirements of national accounts.
4. Provide detailed indicators on consumption expenditure that serve making decision related to production, consumption, export and import.
5. Provide detailed indicators on the sources of households and individuals income.
6. Provide data necessary for formulation of a new consumer price index number.

The raw survey data provided by the Statistical Office were then harmonized by the Economic Research Forum, to create a comparable version with the 2006/2007 Household Socio Economic Survey in Iraq. Harmonization at this stage only included unifying variables' names, labels and some definitions. See: Iraq 2007 & 2012- Variables Mapping & Availability Matrix.pdf provided in the external resources for further information on the mapping of the original variables on the harmonized ones, in addition to more indications on the variables' availability in both survey years and relevant comments.

Geographic coverage

National coverage: Covering a sample of urban, rural and metropolitan areas in all the governorates including those in Kurdistan Region.

Analysis unit

1- Household/family. 2- Individual/person.

Universe

The survey was carried out over a full year covering all governorates including those in Kurdistan Region.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

----> Design:

Sample size was (25488) household for the whole Iraq, 216 households for each district of 118 districts, 2832 clusters each of which includes 9 households distributed on districts and governorates for rural and urban.

----> Sample frame:

Listing and numbering results of 2009-2010 Population and Housing Survey were adopted in all the governorates including Kurdistan Region as a frame to select households, the sample was selected in two stages: Stage 1: Primary sampling unit (blocks) within each stratum (district) for urban and rural were systematically selected with probability proportional to size to reach 2832 units (cluster). Stage two: 9 households from each primary sampling unit were selected to create a cluster, thus the sample size of total survey clusters was 25488 households distributed on the governorates, 216 households in each district.

----> Sampling Stages:

In each district, the sample was selected in two stages: Stage 1: based on 2010 listing and numbering frame 24 sample points were selected within each stratum through systematic sampling with probability proportional to size, in addition to the implicit breakdown urban and rural and geographic breakdown (sub-district, quarter, street, county, village and block). Stage 2: Using households as secondary sampling units, 9 households were selected from each sample point using systematic equal probability sampling. Sampling frames of each stages can be developed based on 2010 building listing and numbering without updating household lists. In some small districts, random selection processes of primary sampling may lead to select less than 24 units therefore a sampling unit is selected more than once , the selection may reach two cluster or more from the same enumeration unit when it is necessary.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

----> Preparation:

The questionnaire of 2006 survey was adopted in designing the questionnaire of 2012 survey on which many revisions were made. Two rounds of pre-test were carried out. Revision were made based on the feedback of field work team, World Bank consultants and others, other revisions were made before final version was implemented in a pilot survey in September 2011. After the pilot survey implemented, other revisions were made in based on the challenges and feedbacks emerged during the implementation to implement the final version in the actual survey.

----> Questionnaire Parts:

The questionnaire consists of four parts each with several sections: Part 1: Socio – Economic Data: - Section 1: Household Roster - Section 2: Emigration - Section 3: Food Rations - Section 4: housing - Section 5: education - Section 6: health - Section 7: Physical measurements - Section 8: job seeking and previous job

Part 2: Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Expenditures: - Section 9: Expenditures on Non – Food Commodities and Services (past 30 days). - Section 10 : Expenditures on Non – Food Commodities and Services (past 90 days). - Section 11: Expenditures on Non – Food Commodities and Services (past 12 months). - Section 12: Expenditures on Non-food Frequent Food Stuff and Commodities (7 days). - Section 12, Table 1: Meals Had Within the Residential Unit. - Section 12, table 2: Number of Persons Participate in the Meals within Household Expenditure Other Than its Members.

Part 3: Income and Other Data: - Section 13: Job - Section 14: paid jobs - Section 15: Agriculture, forestry and fishing - Section 16: Household non – agricultural projects - Section 17: Income from ownership and transfers - Section 18: Durable goods - Section 19: Loans, advances and subsidies - Section 20: Shocks and strategy of dealing in the households - Section 21: Time use - Section 22: Justice - Section 23: Satisfaction in life - Section 24: Food consumption during past 7 days

Part 4: Diary of Daily Expenditures: Diary of expenditure is an essential component of this survey. It is left at the household to record all the daily purchases such as expenditures on food and frequent non-food items such as gasoline, newspapers…etc. during 7 days. Two pages were allocated for recording the expenditures of each day, thus the roster will be consists of 14 pages.

Cleaning operations

----> Raw Data:

Data Editing and Processing: To ensure accuracy and consistency, the data were edited at the following stages: 1. Interviewer: Checks all answers on the household questionnaire, confirming that they are clear and correct. 2. Local Supervisor: Checks to make sure that questions has been correctly completed. 3. Statistical analysis: After exporting data files from excel to SPSS, the Statistical Analysis Unit uses program commands to identify irregular or non-logical values in addition to auditing some variables. 4. World Bank consultants in coordination with the CSO data management team: the World Bank technical consultants use additional programs in SPSS and STAT to examine and correct remaining inconsistencies within the data files. The software detects errors by analyzing questionnaire items according to the expected parameter for each variable.

----> Harmonized Data:

• The SPSS package is used to harmonize the Iraq Household Socio Economic Survey (IHSES) 2007 with Iraq Household Socio Economic Survey (IHSES) 2012.
• The harmonization process starts with raw data files received from the Statistical Office.
• A program is generated for each dataset to create harmonized variables.
• Data is saved on the household and individual level, in SPSS and then converted to STATA, to be disseminated.

Response rate

Iraq Household Socio Economic Survey (IHSES) reached a total of 25488 households. Number of households refused to response was 305, response rate was 98.6%. The highest interview rates were in Ninevah and Muthanna (100%) while the lowest rates were in Sulaimaniya (92%).

Electroencephalogram (EEG) is used to monitor child's brain during coma by recording data on electrical neural activity of the brain. Signals are captured by multiple electrodes called channels located over the scalp. Statistical analyses of EEG data includes classification and prediction using arrays of EEG features, but few models for the underlying stochastic processes have been proposed. For this purpose, a new strictly stationary strong mixing diffusion model with marginal multimodal (three-peak) distribution (MixGGDiff) and exponentially decaying autocorrelation function for modeling of increments of EEG data was proposed. The increments were treated as discrete-time observations and a diffusion process where the stationary distribution is viewed as a mixture of three non-central generalized Gaussian distributions (MixGGD) was constructed.Probability density function of a mixed generalized Gaussian distribution (MixGGD) consists of three components and is described using a total of 12 parameters:\muk, location parameter of each of the components,sk, shape parameter of each of the components, \sigma2k, parameter related to the scale of each of the components andwk, weight of each of the components, where k, k={1,2,3} refers to theindex of the component of a MixGGD. The parameters of this distribution were estimated using the expectation-maximization algorithm, where the added shape parameter is estimated using the higher order statistics approach based on an analytical relationship between the shape parameter and kurtosis.To illustrate an application of the MixGGDiff to real data, analysis of EEG data collected in Uganda between 2008 and 2015 from 78 children within age-range of 18 months to 12 years who were in coma due to cerebral malaria was performed. EEG were recorded using the International 10–20 system with the sampling rate of 500 Hz and the average record duration of 30 min. EEG signal for every child was the result of a recording from 19 channels. MixGGD was fitted to each channel of every child's recording separately, hence for each channel a total of 12 parameter estimates were obtained. The data is presented in a matrix form (dimension 79*228) in a .csv format and consists of 79 rows where the first row is a header row which contains the names of the variables and the subsequent 78 rows represent parameter estimates of one instance (i.e. one child, without identifiers that could be related back to a specific child). There are a total of 228 columns (19 channels times 12 parameter estimates) where each column represents one parameter estimate of one component of MixGGD in the order of the channels, thus columns 1 to 12 refer to parameter estimates on the first channel, columns 13 to 24 refer to parameter estimates on the second channel and so on. Each variable name starts with "chi" where "ch" is an abbreviation of "channel" and i refers to the order of the channel from EEG recording. The rest of the characters in variable names refer to the parameter estimate names of the components of a MixGGD, thus for example "ch3sigmasq1" refers to the parameter estimate of \sigma2 of the first component of MixGGD obtained from EEG increments on the third channel. Parameter estimates contained in the .csv file are all real numbers within a range of -671.11 and 259326.96.Research results based upon these data are published at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02524-y

This individual (part 3a) dataset is displayed by statistical area 1 geography and contains information on:

• Work and labour force status

• Status in employment

• Occupation – major group, by usual residence address

• Occupation – major group, by workplace address*

• Industry (division), by usual residence address

• Industry (division), by workplace address*

* Workplace address is coded from information supplied by respondents about their workplaces. Where respondents do not supply sufficient information, their responses are coded to ‘not further defined’. The statistical area 1 dataset for 2018 Census excludes these ‘not further defined’ areas.

This dataset contains counts at statistical area 1 for selected variables from the 2018, 2013, and 2006 censuses. The geography corresponds to 2018 boundaries.

The data uses fixed random rounding to protect confidentiality. Some counts of less than 6 are suppressed according to 2018 confidentiality rules. Values of ‘-999’ indicate suppressed data.

For further information on this dataset please refer to the Statistical area 1 dataset for 2018 Census webpage - footnotes for individual part 3a, Excel workbooks, and CSV files are available to download. Data quality ratings for 2018 Census variables, summarising the quality rating and priority levels for 2018 Census variables, are available.

For information on the statistical area 1 geography please refer to the Statistical standard for geographic areas 2018.

Overview This project analyzes life expectancy across countries, utilizing data from 2000 to 2015. The study examines how key socioeconomic and health factors influence life expectancy. Factors such as GDP, adult mortality, schooling, HIV/AIDS prevalence, and BMI are included in the analysis, which uses multiple linear regression and mixed-effects modeling to determine which variables significantly affect life expectancy.

Data Description The dataset includes life expectancy information and its influencing factors from various countries over a 15-year period (2000-2015). The data was sourced from the WHO Life Expectancy Dataset available on Kaggle. It comprises both continuous and categorical variables, including: • Life Expectancy (Dependent Variable): Average number of years an individual is expected to live. Continuous Variables: o GDP per capita o Adult Mortality (per 1000 individuals aged 15-65) o Schooling (mean years of education) o Alcohol consumption per capita Categorical Variables: o HIV/AIDS prevalence o Country status (Developed vs. Developing) o BMI category (Underweight, Normal, Overweight, Obese)

Problem Statement Life expectancy is a crucial metric for assessing the overall health and well-being of populations. It varies significantly between countries due to economic, social, and health factors. This project seeks to identify the most important variables that predict life expectancy, offering insights for policymakers on improving public health and longevity in their populations. Hypotheses 1. Higher GDP leads to higher life expectancy. 2. Higher adult mortality results in lower life expectancy. 3. More years of schooling increase life expectancy. 4. Higher HIV/AIDS prevalence reduces life expectancy. 5. Living in a developed country increases life expectancy. 6. Higher BMI (underweight or obese) correlates with reduced life expectancy. 7. Higher alcohol consumption reduces life expectancy.

Methodology • Data Preprocessing: Missing values were handled by imputation, and skewed variables (like GDP) were log-transformed to improve model performance. • Exploratory Data Analysis: Visualizations (histograms, scatterplots, and box plots) were used to understand the relationships between independent variables and life expectancy. Modeling: o Multiple Linear Regression was used to examine how each continuous and categorical variable impacts life expectancy. o Mixed-effects modeling was applied to account for country-specific effects, capturing variability across different nations.

Key Results 1. GDP: Log-transformed GDP had a significant positive effect on life expectancy, with an adjusted R² of 0.29. Higher income is positively correlated with longer life expectancy. 2. Adult Mortality: Increased adult mortality significantly reduced life expectancy. For every unit increase in adult mortality, life expectancy decreased by 0.042 years. 3. Schooling: More years of schooling was strongly correlated with longer life expectancy, reflecting the importance of education in enhancing health outcomes. 4. HIV/AIDS: Countries with higher HIV/AIDS prevalence had lower life expectancy, with significant negative coefficients for all levels of prevalence. 5. Country Status: Developed countries had significantly higher life expectancy than developing countries, with an average difference of about 1.52 years. 6. BMI: While underweight and obese categories were significant predictors, the relationship between BMI and life expectancy was complex, suggesting that high-income countries might offset health risks through medical care. 7. Alcohol Consumption: Contrary to initial expectations, alcohol consumption did not have a statistically significant effect on life expectancy in this model.

This study examines the impact of internet usage on farmer’s adoption behavior of fertilizer reduction and efficiency enhancement technologies in China. Based on 1,295 questionnaires in Henan Province, this study constructs a counterfactual analysis framework and used endogenous switching probit model to analyze the effects and pathways of internet usage on farmer’s adoption behavior of chemical fertilizer reduction and efficiency enhancement technologies. The results indicate that. (1) The proportion of farmers adopting chemical fertilizer reduction and efficiency enhancement technologies is 60.15%, while the proportion of farmers not adopting these technologies is 39.85%. (2) Internet usage directly influences farmers’ adoption of fertilizer reduction and efficiency enhancement technologies. According to counterfactual assumption analysis, if farmers who currently use the Internet were to stop using it, the probability of them adopting these technologies would decrease by 28.09%. Conversely, for farmers who do not currently use the Internet, if they were to start using it, the probability of them adopting fertilizer reduction and efficiency enhancement technologies would increase by 40.67%. (3) Internet usage indirectly influences farmers’ adoption behavior through mediating pathways of expected benefits and risk perception. In addition, social networks negatively moderate the impact of internet usage on farmers’ behavior of chemical fertilizer reduction and efficiency enhancement technologies.

Dataset Description

This dataset contains a simulated collection of 1,00000 patient records designed to explore hypertension management in resource-constrained settings. It provides comprehensive data for analyzing blood pressure control rates, associated risk factors, and complications. The dataset is ideal for predictive modelling, risk analysis, and treatment optimization, offering insights into demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables.

Dataset Structure

1. Dataset Volume

   • Size: 10,000 records. • Features: 19 variables, categorized into Sociodemographic, Clinical, Complications, and Treatment/Control groups.

2. Variables and Categories

A. Sociodemographic Variables

1. Age:
•  Continuous variable in years.
•  Range: 18–80 years.
•  Mean ± SD: 49.37 ± 12.81.
2. Sex:
•  Categorical variable.
•  Values: Male, Female.
3. Education:
•  Categorical variable.
•  Values: No Education, Primary, Secondary, Higher Secondary, Graduate, Post-Graduate, Madrasa.
4. Occupation:
•  Categorical variable.
•  Values: Service, Business, Agriculture, Retired, Unemployed, Housewife.
5. Monthly Income:
•  Categorical variable in Bangladeshi Taka.
•  Values: <5000, 5001–10000, 10001–15000, >15000.
6. Residence:
•  Categorical variable.
•  Values: Urban, Sub-urban, Rural.

B. Clinical Variables

7. Systolic BP:
•  Continuous variable in mmHg.
•  Range: 100–200 mmHg.
•  Mean ± SD: 140 ± 15 mmHg.
8. Diastolic BP:
•  Continuous variable in mmHg.
•  Range: 60–120 mmHg.
•  Mean ± SD: 90 ± 10 mmHg.
9. Elevated Creatinine:
•  Binary variable (\geq 1.4 \, \text{mg/dL}).
•  Values: Yes, No.
10. Diabetes Mellitus:
•  Binary variable.
•  Values: Yes, No.
11. Family History of CVD:
•  Binary variable.
•  Values: Yes, No.
12. Elevated Cholesterol:
•  Binary variable (\geq 200 \, \text{mg/dL}).
•  Values: Yes, No.
13. Smoking:
•  Binary variable.
•  Values: Yes, No.

C. Complications

14. LVH (Left Ventricular Hypertrophy):
•  Binary variable (ECG diagnosis).
•  Values: Yes, No.
15. IHD (Ischemic Heart Disease):
•  Binary variable.
•  Values: Yes, No.
16. CVD (Cerebrovascular Disease):
•  Binary variable.
•  Values: Yes, No.
17. Retinopathy:
•  Binary variable.
•  Values: Yes, No.

D. Treatment and Control

18. Treatment:
•  Categorical variable indicating therapy type.
•  Values: Single Drug, Combination Drugs.
19. Control Status:
•  Binary variable.
•  Values: Controlled, Uncontrolled.

Dataset Applications

1. Predictive Modeling:
•  Develop models to predict blood pressure control status using demographic and clinical data.
2. Risk Analysis:
•  Identify significant factors influencing hypertension control and complications.
3. Severity Scoring:
•  Quantify hypertension severity for patient risk stratification.
4. Complications Prediction:
•  Forecast complications like IHD, LVH, and CVD for early intervention.
5. Treatment Guidance:
•  Analyze therapy efficacy to recommend optimal treatment strategies.

No description found

This dataset was extracted by the paper Schönbrodt, F. D., Humberg, S., & Nestler, S. (2018). Testing similarity effects with dyadic response surface analysis. We renamed variables to illustration an example in supply chain: X = female predictor variable, Y = male predictor variable, Z_f = female outcome variable have been renamed in this tutorial Y = supplier dependence predictor variable, X = buyer dependence predictor variable, Z_b = buyer satisfaction outcome variable.

Data source: SHARE waves 1, 2, and 4.

This dataset presents a rich collection of physicochemical parameters from 147 reservoirs distributed across the conterminous U.S. One hundred and eight of the reservoirs were selected using a statistical survey design and can provide unbiased inferences to the condition of all U.S. reservoirs. These data could be of interest to local water management specialists or those assessing the ecological condition of reservoirs at the national scale. These data have been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. This dataset is not publicly accessible because: It is too large. It can be accessed through the following means: https://portal-s.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?scope=edi&identifier=2033&revision=1. Format: This dataset presents water quality and related variables for 147 reservoirs distributed across the U.S. Water quality parameters were measured during the summers of 2016, 2018, and 2020 – 2023. Measurements include nutrient concentration, algae abundance, dissolved oxygen concentration, and water temperature, among many others. Dataset includes links to other national and global scale data sets that provide additional variables.

N.B. This is not real data. Only here for an example for project templates.

Project Title: Add title here

Project Team: Add contact information for research project team members

Summary: Provide a descriptive summary of the nature of your research project and its aims/focal research questions.

Relevant publications/outputs: When available, add links to the related publications/outputs from this data.

Data availability statement: If your data is not linked on figshare directly, provide links to where it is being hosted here (i.e., Open Science Framework, Github, etc.). If your data is not going to be made publicly available, please provide details here as to the conditions under which interested individuals could gain access to the data and how to go about doing so.

Data collection details: 1. When was your data collected? 2. How were your participants sampled/recruited?

Sample information: How many and who are your participants? Demographic summaries are helpful additions to this section.

Research Project Materials: What materials are necessary to fully reproduce your the contents of your dataset? Include a list of all relevant materials (e.g., surveys, interview questions) with a brief description of what is included in each file that should be uploaded alongside your datasets.

List of relevant datafile(s): If your project produces data that cannot be contained in a single file, list the names of each of the files here with a brief description of what parts of your research project each file is related to.

Data codebook: What is in each column of your dataset? Provide variable names as they are encoded in your data files, verbatim question associated with each response, response options, details of any post-collection coding that has been done on the raw-response (and whether that's encoded in a separate column).

Examples available at: https://www.thearda.com/data-archive?fid=PEWMU17 https://www.thearda.com/data-archive?fid=RELLAND14

The PRIEST study used patient data from the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The PRIEST study provided descriptive statistics of UK patients with suspected COVID-19 in an emergency department cohort, analysis of existing triage tools, and derivation and validation of a COVID-19 specific tool for adults with suspected COVID-19. For more details please go to the study website:https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/research/centres/cure/priestFiles contained in PRIEST study data repository Main files include:PRIEST.csv dataset contains 22445 observations and 119 variables. Data include initial presentation and follow-up, one row per participant.PRIEST_variables.csv contains variable names, values and brief description.Additional files include:Follow-up v4.0 PDF - Blank 30-day follow-up data collection toolPandemic Respiratory Infection Form v7 PDF - Blank baseline data collection toolPRIEST protocol v11.0_17Aug20 PDF - Study protocolPRIEST_SAP_v1.0_19jun20 PDF - Statistical analysis planThe PRIEST data sharing plan follows a controlled access model as described in Good Practice Principles for Sharing Individual Participant Data from Publicly Funded Clinical Trials. Data sharing requests should be emailed to priest-study@sheffield.ac.uk. Data sharing requests will be considered carefully as to whether it is necessary to fulfil the purpose of the data sharing request. For approval of a data sharing request an approved ethical review and study protocol must be provided. The PRIEST study was approved by NRES Committee North West - Haydock. REC reference: 12/NW/0303

The U.S. Population Grids (Summary File 1), 2000: Houston Metropolitan Statistical Area, Alpha Version data set contains an ARC/INFO Workspace with grids of demographic data from the 2000 census. The grids have a resolution of 7.5 arc-seconds (0.002075 decimal degrees), or approximately 250 square meters. The gridded variables are based on census block geography from Census 2000 TIGER/Line Files and census variables (population, households, and housing variables) from Summary File 1. This data set is produced by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).