In 2023, Singapore ranked first with a health index score of ****, followed by Japan and South Korea. The health index measures the extent to which people are healthy and have access to the necessary services to maintain good health, including health outcomes, health systems, illness and risk factors, and mortality rates. The statistic shows the health and health systems ranking of countries worldwide in 2023, by their health index score.

The healthcare ranking reflects the quality of health care and access to health services in different countries. The assessment includes various factors such as life expectancy, access to medical services, healthcare funding, and technologies.

In 2023, Norway ranked first with a health index score of 83, followed by Iceland and Sweden. The health index score is calculated by evaluating various indicators that assess the health of the population, and access to the services required to sustain good health, including health outcomes, health systems, sickness and risk factors, and mortality rates. The statistic shows the health and health systems ranking of European countries in 2023, by their health index score.

According to a 2021 health care systems ranking among selected high-income countries, the United States came last in the overall ranking of its health care system performance. The overall ranking was based on five performance categories, including access to care, care process, administrative efficiency, equity, and health care outcomes. For the category administrative efficiency, which measures the amount of paperwork for providers and patients in the health system, the U.S. was ranked last, while Norway took first place. This could be because the health system in the U.S. is a multi-payer system, while Norway has a single-payer system, which most likely simplifies documentation and billing tasks. This statistic present the health care administrative efficiency rankings of the United States' health care system compared to ten other high-income countries in 2021.

According to a survey from *************, Taiwan was ranked as the best country for expat healthcare, followed by South Korea and Qatar. This statistic represents the ranking of top ten countries with best healthcare for expats worldwide in 2023.

The average for 2020 based on 36 countries was 4.44 hospital beds. The highest value was in South Korea: 12.65 hospital beds and the lowest value was in Mexico: 0.99 hospital beds. The indicator is available from 1960 to 2021. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

Background and objectiveThe capacity to promote and disseminate the best evidence-based practices in terms of digital health innovations and technologies represents an important goal for countries and governments. To support the digital health maturity across countries the Global Digital Health Partnership (GDHP) was established in 2019. The mission of the GDHP is to facilitate global collaboration and knowledge-sharing in the design of digital health services, through the administration of surveys and white papers.ObjectiveThe scope of this study is to critically analyze and discuss results from the Evidence and Evaluation GDHP Work Stream’s survey, understand how governments and countries intend to address main obstacles to the digital health implementation, identify their strategies for a communication of effective digital health services, and promote the sharing of international based best practices on digital health.MethodsThis survey followed a cross-sectional study approach. A multiple-choice questionnaire was designed to gather data. Choices were extracted from research publications retrieved through a rapid review.ResultsOut of 29 countries receiving the survey, 10 returned it. On a scale from 1 to 5, eHealth systems/platforms (mean = 3.56) were indicated as the most important tool for centralized infrastructure to collect information on digital health, while primary care (mean = 4.0) represented the most voted item for healthcare services to collect information on digital health. Seven Countries out of 10 identified lack of organization, skepticism of clinicians, and accessibility of the population as a barriers to adopt digital health implementation, resulting to be the most voted items. Finally, the most endorsed priorities in digital health for Countries were the adoption of data-driven approaches (6 Countries), and telehealth (5 Countries).ConclusionThis survey highlighted the main tools and obstacles for countries to promote the implementation of evidence-based digital health innovations. Identifying strategies that would communicate the value of health care information technology to healthcare professionals are particularly imperative. Effective communication programs for clinicians and the general population in addition to improved digital health literacy (both for clinicians and citizens) will be the key for the real implementation of future digital health technologies.

In 2025, South Africa had the highest health care index in Africa with a score of 63.8, followed by Kenya with 62 points. These scores, for both countries, are considered to be reasonably high. The health care index takes into account factors such as the overall quality of the health care system, health care professionals, equipment, staff, doctors, and cost.

The average for 2021 based on 181 countries was 7.21 percent. The highest value was in Afghanistan: 21.83 percent and the lowest value was in Brunei: 2.2 percent. The indicator is available from 2000 to 2022. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

BackgroundTo promote shared digital health best practices in a global context, as agreed within the Global Digital Health Partnership (GDHP), one of the most important topics to evaluate is the ability to detect what participating countries believe to be priorities suitable to improve their healthcare systems. No previously published scientific papers investigated these aspects as a cross-country comparison.ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to present results concerning the priorities identification section of the Evidence and Evaluation survey addressed to GDHP members in 2021, comparing countries’ initiatives and perspectives for the future of digital health based on internationally agreed developments.MethodsThis survey followed a cross-sectional study approach. An online survey was addressed to the stakeholders of 29 major countries.ResultsTen out of 29 countries answered the survey. The mean global score of 3.54 out of 5, calculated on the whole data set, demonstrates how the global attention to a digital evolution in health is shared by most of the evaluated countries.ConclusionThe resulting insights on the differences between digital health priority identification among different GDHP countries serves as a starting point to coordinate further progress on digital health worldwide and foster evidence-based collaboration.

The average for 2021 based on 10 countries was 46.11 index points. The highest value was in Singapore: 130.04 index points and the lowest value was in Laos: 21.7 index points. The indicator is available from 2017 to 2021. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

South Korea Number of Hospital was up 3.5% in 2019, compared to the previous year.

Editor’s Choice

• The Healthcare IT market size is expected to be worth around USD 1728 Bn by 2032
• According to a report by UNESCO, countries in South and South-West Asia have the highest number of illiterate adults in the world, estimated at 388 million.
• Approximately 36% of adult Americans possess only basic or below basic health literacy skills.
• Only 12% of Americans are considered proficient in their health literacy skills.
• Health literacy levels in China increased from 6.48% of the population in 2008 to 23.15% in 2020.
• A recent study analyzing global health literacy research from 1995 to 2020 identified the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom as major contributors to the international collaboration network on health literacy.
• Mental health has been the most active research field in recent years in the context of health literacy.

Hospital Cleaning Chemicals Market Outlook

The global market size for hospital cleaning chemicals was valued at approximately USD 10 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 18 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 7.5% during the forecast period. The increasing awareness regarding hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and a stringent regulatory landscape are significant growth factors propelling the hospital cleaning chemicals market.

One of the primary growth drivers for the hospital cleaning chemicals market is the rising awareness and concern regarding hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). HAIs pose a severe threat to patient safety and generate significant financial burdens on healthcare systems. This has led to an increased focus on maintaining high standards of hygiene in healthcare facilities, thus boosting the demand for effective cleaning chemicals. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of proper cleaning protocols in minimizing infection rates, which further substantiates the growth of this market.

Another critical factor contributing to market growth is the ever-evolving regulatory landscape aimed at ensuring the highest levels of cleanliness in healthcare facilities. Governmental and non-governmental organizations are implementing stringent guidelines and regulations to ensure the safety and cleanliness of medical environments. Compliance with these regulations necessitates the use of certified and effective cleaning chemicals, thereby pushing the market forward. Institutions are now more willing to invest in high-quality cleaning agents to meet these regulatory requirements and safeguard both patients and healthcare workers.

The advent of advanced cleaning technologies is also playing a pivotal role in driving the market. Innovations such as eco-friendly cleaning agents, automated cleaning systems, and advanced disinfection technologies are creating new growth avenues. These innovations not only enhance the efficacy of cleaning processes but also reduce the environmental impact, which is increasingly becoming a critical consideration for healthcare institutions. The integration of such advanced technologies ensures a more thorough and efficient cleaning process, thereby fostering market expansion.

Regionally, North America and Europe are the dominant markets for hospital cleaning chemicals, owing to their advanced healthcare infrastructures and stringent regulatory frameworks. However, emerging markets in the Asia-Pacific region are expected to witness the highest growth rates. The rapid expansion of healthcare facilities, coupled with increasing investments in healthcare infrastructure, is driving the demand for hospital cleaning chemicals in these regions. Countries like China and India, with their large populations and increasing healthcare awareness, offer substantial growth opportunities.

Product Type Analysis

The hospital cleaning chemicals market is segmented by product type into disinfectants, sanitizers, detergents, surface cleaners, and others. Disinfectants hold the largest market share, primarily due to their crucial role in eliminating harmful microorganisms and preventing HAIs. The increasing incidence of infectious diseases and stringent infection control policies in hospitals globally are driving the demand for disinfectants. Healthcare facilities are particularly focused on using high-level disinfectants that are effective against a wide spectrum of pathogens to ensure patient safety.

Sanitizers are another critical segment, witnessing significant growth due to their ease of use and effectiveness in reducing microbial load. The COVID-19 pandemic has further underscored the importance of hand hygiene, resulting in a surge in demand for sanitizers. Hospitals and other healthcare facilities are now incorporating sanitizers as a fundamental part of their infection control protocols. This segment is expected to continue its growth trajectory, supported by ongoing public health campaigns that emphasize the importance of hand hygiene.

Detergents are primarily used for general cleaning purposes, including the removal of dirt, grime, and organic matter from various surfaces. They play a foundational role in the initial phase of the cleaning process, before the application of disinfectants. The demand for detergents is driven by their essential application across different areas in a hospital, from floor cleaning to cleaning of medical instruments. The focus on maintaining overall cleanliness and hygiene in healthcare settings ensures a steady demand for this segment.

Objective: With more people living with HIV (PLHIV) ageing into their 50s and beyond in settings where antiretroviral therapy is widely available, non-AIDS comorbidities and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are becoming major challenges. Information is needed about whether national HIV monitoring programmes have evolved to reflect the changing focus of HIV care.Methods: We created a 56-item English-language survey to assess whether health systems report on common health-related issues for people with HIV including physical and mental health comorbidities, HRQoL, psychosocial needs, and fertility desires. One expert was identified via purposive sampling in each of six countries (Estonia, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Sweden, and Turkey) and was asked to participate in the survey.Results: Three respondents reported that the current monitoring systems in their countries do not monitor any of four specified aspects of 10 comorbidities including bone loss, cardiovascular disease, and neurocognitive disorders. Two respondents stated that their countries potentially can report on leading causes of hospital admission among PLHIV, and five on leading cases of death. In three countries, respondents reported that there was the ability to report on the HRQoL of PLHIV. In two countries, respondents provided data on the percentage of PLHIV denied health services because of HIV status in the past 12 months.Conclusions: This study identified areas for potential HIV monitoring improvements in six European countries in relation to comorbidities, HRQoL, discrimination within health systems, and other issues associated with the changing nature of the HIV epidemic. It also indicated that some countries either currently monitor or have the ability to monitor some of these issues. There are opportunities for health information systems in European countries to expand the scope of their HIV monitoring in order to support decision-making about how the long-term health-related needs of PLHIV can best be met.

Data on physicians should refer to those "immediately serving patients", i.e. physicians who have direct contact with patients as consumers of health care services. In the context of comparing health care services across Member States, Eurostat considers that this is the concept which best describes the availability of health care resources. However, Member States use different concepts when they report the number of health care professionals. Therefore, for some countries, the data might include physicians who work in their profession but do not see patients (i.e. they work in research, administration etc.) or refer to physicians "licensed to practice" (i.e. successfully graduated physicians irrespective whether they see patients or not). Please have a look in the annexes of the metadata to see for which concept these data refer to for each country.

Quality of life in a country comparison A total of 36 factors were included in the calculation of the overall index, which were divided into 7 subject areas here. The best achievable value in each division is 100, see below the table to read which individual criteria are included in each division.

Rank
Country Stability(15%) - Political and economic stability Rights(20%) -Legal system and civil rights, freedom of expression Health(15%) - Health and medical services Safety(10%) Climate(15%)
Costs(15%) - Cost of living and average annual income Popularity(10%) - Popularity of the country with foreigners TotalQuality of life(100%)

Acknowledgements- This dataset is taken from https://www.worlddata.info/quality-of-life.php I just shared it to ka kaggle for convenience. ( I will take this down at first request. I am not the owner of this dataset.)

BackgroundGallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare, highly fatal disease with diagnosis in advanced stage and low survival rate. Nepal ranked 4th position with highest rates of GBC for 10 countries in 2020.ObjectiveTo find the association between socio-demographic, behavioral and environmental factors associated with the development of GBC.MethodA case-control study was conducted in 2021/22 with newly diagnosed gallbladder cancer cases from three cancer-specialized hospitals and one tertiary (superspeciality) hospital. Controls were selected from the same tertiary hospital and one additional hospital providing services to gallbladder pathologies for a huge population, making a total of five hospitals involved in the study. The ratio of cases to control was 1:1. The data collection was done through telephonic interviews using structured questionnaires. The risk factors for GBC were assessed by using unconditional logistic regression to find odds ratios and 95% confidence level for bivariate and multivariate analysis. The statistical analysis was carried out in STATA 18.ResultA total of 240 respondents were enrolled in the study, among them half were GBC patients (cases) and half were gallbladder patients (controls). The average age of the respondents was 54.82±12.3 years, with female preponderance among both groups. On multivariate analysis, the risk factors studied were; parity ≥3 (AOR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.17–6.66, P value 0.020), being ethnic group of Terai/Madhesi (AOR = 7.88, 95% CI: 3.16–19.66, P value

Malaria and Human Immunodeficiency Virus infections are among the top 10 causes of death in low income countries. Furthermore, many medicines used in these treatment areas are substandard, which contributes to the high death rate. Using a monitoring system to identify substandard and falsified medicines, the study aims to evaluate the quality of antimalarial and antiretroviral medicines in Sahel countries, assessing site conditions, compliance of medicines with pharmacopoeia tests, formulation equivalence with a reference medicine, and the influence of climate on quality attributes. Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography methods for eight active pharmaceutical ingredients were validated following the International Conference for Harmonization guideline for its detection and quantification. Quality control consists of visual inspections to detect any misinformation or imperfections and pharmacopeial testing to determine the quality of pharmaceutical products. Medicines which complied with uniformity dosage units and dissolution tests were stored under accelerated conditions for 6 months. Artemether/Lumefantrine and Lopinavir/Ritonavir formulations failed uniformity dosage units and disintegration tests respectively, detecting a total of 28.6% substandard medicines. After 6 months stored under accelerated conditions (40 °C // 75% relative humidity) simulating climatic conditions in Sahel countries, some medicines failed pharmacopeia tests. It demonstrated the influence of these two factors in their quality attributes. This study emphasizes the need of certified quality control laboratories as well as the need for regulatory systems to maintain standards in pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution in these countries, especially when medicines are transported to rural areas where these climatic conditions are harsher.

Explore the top import markets for medical furniture in 2023 and discover the countries driving the global demand for quality healthcare products.