In the first quarter of 2024, the unemployment rate was 7.3 percent. The unemployment curve has been declining since the first quarter of 2018, aside from a rise in the third quarter of 2020.Between 1982 and 2020, the unemployment curve fluctuated widely from 6.4 percent in the first quarter of 1982 to 10.4 percent in the first quarter of 1994. Since 1982, France has never achieved full employment, estimated at five percent by the International Labor Organization (ILO).Unemployment represents all people aged 15 and over who are unemployed and looking for a job. Its measurement is complex. The boundaries between employment, unemployment, and inactivity are not always easy to establish, which often leads to talk of a "halo" around unemployment. The source follows the definition of unemployment described by the ILO.

Unemployment Rate in Indonesia decreased to 4.82 percent in the first quarter of 2024 from 5.32 percent in the third quarter of 2023. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Indonesia Unemployment Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Arbejdsløshedsprocenten i Haiti steg til 14,90 procent i 2023 fra 14,80 procent i 2022. Aktuelle værdier, historiske data, prognoser, statistik, diagrammer og økonomisk kalender - Haiti - Arbejdsløshed Rate.

This data collection supplies standard monthly labor force data for the week prior to the survey. Comprehensive information is given on the employment status, occupation, and industry of persons 14 years old and older. Additional data are available concerning weeks worked and hours per week worked, reason not working full-time, total income and income components, and residence. Besides the CPS core questions, this survey also gathered supplemental data on birth history, birth expectations, and child care arrangements. Data for women aged 15-59 years include the total number of children ever born, date of birth of the first child and most recent child, and date of first marriage. Women aged 18-44 years with a child under five years old in the household were asked about child care arrangements, including location of the facility, hours child care was provided, if cash or noncash payments were made, and whether they would work more hours if satisfactory child care was available. Information on demographic characteristics, such as age, sex, race, marital status, veteran status, household relationship, educational background, and Hispanic origin, is available for each person in the household enumerated.

The unemployment rate has generally declined in Bretagne in the past few years. The French region had indeed an unemployment rate of 6.9 percent in the first quarter of 1982, and a rate of 5.9 percent in the second quarter of 2022. The highest unemployment rate was recorded in the first quarter of 1985, at nearly ten percent, and the lowest at the end of 2021 and beginning of 2022, at 5.8 percent. In 2022, Bretagne was the region of metropolitan France with the lowest unemployment rate.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

The Joint Unemployment and Vacancies Operating System Cohort (JUVOS) is a 5% sample of all computerised claims for unemployment-related benefits selected by reference to a claimant's National Insurance (NI) number. Each time a person with a relevant NI number makes a claim for unemployment-related benefits their details are added to the cohort file.

The purpose of the study is to provide a means of examining long-term dynamics of the labour market. It enables analysis of claimant unemployment, the number of unemployment spells experienced by individuals, and the length of time between spells of unemployment. It provides information on the number of previous claims that a claimant has made within a specified period, and also on the gap between the start of their more recent (or in some cases current) claim, and the end of their previous claim (if one existed).

The JUVOS database is used to inform policy decisions on employment and training, welfare and social security. It assists in monitoring the impact of government schemes, and is used by various government departments, including the Department for Education and Skills, the Department for Work and Pensions, local authorities, consultants and researchers.

The date coverage of the 13th edition is October 1982 - January 2006. Please see READ file for full details.


Main Topics:

Unemployment-related topics covered include: length of claim; number of claims; age of claimant through date of birth; location of claimant; occupation (usual) of claimant; occupation (sought) of claimant; sex; marital status; date of claim start; date of claim end; length of time between claims.

Unemployment Rate in Luxembourg remained unchanged at 5.90 percent in February. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Luxembourg Unemployment Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Judgement on one´s own job situation and the situation in the job market in the course of time. This is a three-wave panel. Topics: First wave: The first wave of this investigation is at the same time the survey described under ZA Study No. 1084. Topics: professional career and satisfaction with occupational development; work satisfaction; job security; career orientation; attitude to occupational planning; correspondence of training and future demands of occupation; characterization of job; the route to work and means of transport used; characterization of company; judgement on the development of the company and the area of business; assumed difficulties in searching for work; accepting setback in a change of job; readiness for mobility; participation in further education measures within and outside work; readiness for further education; weekly working hours and overtime; assessment of self-confidence in selected situations (scale); judgement on the reasonableness of an offer of a position as worker or with lower income; memberships; residential status; type of city; size of municipality class; administrative district. Demography: age; sex; marital status; school education; vocational training; household income; size of household; composition of household; respondent is head of household; characteristics of head of household. Second wave: as a so-called panel maintenance a short questionnaire was sent to the respondents. In this mail survey (November 1980) the following questions were posed: current employment status; moving frequency; change of residence and distance moved; cause of moving. Third wave: The third wave is identical to the fourth wave of the unemployed survey as described in ZA Study No. 1362: assessment of the economic situation; times of employment or unemployment from 1978 to 1981; assessment of occupational consequences of personal unemployment; reason for last unemployment; number of jobs offered by employment office; one´s own initiative in the search for work; aid taken advantage of for occupational reintegration; satisfaction with employment office and case worker; description of current employment situation; interest in regaining employment; part time or full time position; assessment whether employment can be resumed in the next five years; establishing a specific occupation or a specific profession; income concepts; occupational mobility; acceptable or reasonable problems in regaining employment; current registration with employment office as unemployed; reasons for not finding a suitable position (scale); sources of income to support cost of living; assessment of condition of health; reduction in earning capacity; illnesses and complaints in the last three months; psychological self-characterization of self-confidence and work orientation (scales); moving frequency. The following questions were also posed to those who in the meantime had found work: success of mediation by employment office; temporary or permanent employment; detailed characterization of current activity and relationship with occupation learned; hours worked each week and overtime; length of route to work; assessment of the security of one´s own job. Those who had not yet found work characterized their last job according to the same criteria. Beurteilung der eigenen Arbeitssituation und der Lage am Arbeitsmarkt im Zeitverlauf. Es handelt sich um ein dreiwelliges Panel. Themen: 1.Welle: Die erste Welle dieser Untersuchung ist gleichzeitig die unter der ZA-Studien-Nr. 1084 beschriebene Befragung: Themen: Berufslaufbahn und Zufriedenheit mit der beruflichen Entwicklung; Arbeitszufriedenheit; Arbeitsplatzsicherheit; Karriereorientierung; Einstellung zur Berufsplanung; Entsprechung von Ausbildung und Zukunftsanforderungen des Berufs; Charakterisierung des Arbeitsplatzes; Arbeitsweg und benutztes Verkehrsmittel; Charakterisierung des Betriebs; Beurteilung der Entwicklung des Betriebs und der Branche; vermutete Schwierigkeiten bei einer Arbeitsplatzsuche; Inkaufnahme von Verschlechterungen bei einem Arbeitsplatzwechsel; Mobilitätsbereitschaft; Teilnahme an inner- und außerbetrieblichen Fortbildungsmaßnahmen; Weiterbildungsbereitschaft; wöchentliche Arbeitszeit und Überstunden; Einschätzung des Selbstvertrauens in ausgewählten Situationen (Skala); Beurteilung der Zumutbarkeit einer angebotenen Stelle als Arbeiter bzw. mit geringerem Verdienst; Mitgliedschaften; Wohnstatus; Ortstyp; Gemeindegrößenklasse; Regierungsbezirk. Demographie: Alter; Geschlecht; Familienstand; Schulbildung; Berufsausbildung; Haushaltseinkommen; Haushaltsgröße; Haushaltszusammensetzung; Befragter ist Haushaltsvorstand; Charakteristika des Haushaltsvorstands. 2.Welle: Als sogenannte Panelpflege wurde ein Kurzfragebogen an die Befragten verschickt. In dieser postalischen Befragung (November 1980) wurde gefragt: Derzeitiger Erwerbsstatus; Umzugshäufigkeit; Wohnungswechsel und Umzugsentfernung; Anlaß für den Umzug. 3.Welle: Die dritte Welle ist identisch mit der vierten Welle der Arbeitslosenbefragung, so wie sie in der ZA-Studien-Nr. 1362 beschrieben ist: Einschätzung der wirtschaftlichen Situation; Zeiten der Berufstätigkeit bzw. Arbeitslosigkeit von 1978 bis 1981; Einschätzung der beruflichen Folgen der eigenen Arbeitslosigkeit; Grund für die letzte Arbeitslosigkeit; Anzahl der angebotenen Stellen vom Arbeitsamt; Eigeninitiative bei der Arbeitssuche; in Anspruch genommene Hilfen für die berufliche Wiedereingliederung; Zufriedenheit mit dem Arbeitsamt und dem Arbeitsvermittler; Beschreibung der derzeitigen Erwerbssituation; Interesse an der Wiedererlangung einer Berufstätigkeit; Teilzeit- oder Vollzeitstelle; Einschätzung, ob eine Berufstätigkeit in den nächsten fünf Jahren wieder aufgenommen werden kann; Festlegung auf eine bestimmte Tätigkeit oder einen bestimmten Beruf; Einkommensvorstellungen; berufliche Mobilität; in Kauf genommene bzw. zumutbare Probleme zur Wiedererlangung einer Berufstätigkeit; derzeitige Registrierung beim Arbeitsamt als arbeitslos; Gründe, weshalb keine geeignete Stelle gefunden wurde (Skala); Einkommensquellen zur Bestreitung des Lebensunterhalts; Einschätzung des Gesundheitszustands; Erwerbsminderung; Krankheiten und Beschwerden in den letzten drei Monaten; psychologische Selbstcharakterisierung des Selbstvertrauens und der Arbeitsorientierung (Skalen); Umzugshäufigkeit. Diejenigen, die inzwischen eine Tätigkeit gefunden hatten, wurden zusätzlich gefragt: Erfolg der Vermittlung durch das Arbeitsamt; vorübergehendes oder Dauerarbeitsverhältnis; detaillierte Charakterisierung der derzeitigen Tätigkeit und Verhältnis zum erlernten Beruf; Wochenarbeitsstunden und Überstunden; Dauer des Arbeitswegs; Einschätzung der Sicherheit des eigenen Arbeitsplatzes. Diejenigen, die noch keine Arbeit gefunden hatten, charakterisierten ihre letzte Arbeitsstelle nach den gleichen Kriterien. Household sample of employed workers and employees according to a random route procedure. Foreigners were not interviewed. Haushaltsstichprobe der beschäftigten Arbeiter und Angestellten nach einem Random-Route-Verfahren.

Youth Unemployment Rate in South Korea increased to 7 percent in February from 6 percent in January of 2025. This dataset provides - South Korea Youth Unemployment Rate- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

The Employment Summary Statistics dataset is part of the Census of Governments, a complete enumeration of United States governmental units undertaken every five years. This data collection contains the October, 1982 employment and payroll figures for the governments. Data for full- and part-time employment and payrolls are shown for such functions as administration, education, corrections, police, fire protection, utilities, health, public welfare, parks, libraries, sanitation, highways, and transit. Data are also provided for labor-management relations, employee organizations, employee benefits, and unemployment, health, and life insurance. There are four files in this collection. File A provides detailed statistics for each state and local government, File B has the data for local governmental units aggregated by county, and File C has national and state summaries for the following types of governments: (1) State and Local Government Total, (2) State Government, (3) Local Government, (4) Local Governments in SMSA's, (5) Counties, (6) Municipalities, (7) Townships, (8) School Districts, and (9) Special Districts. In addition, the Name and Address File contains name, address, and corresponding government identification code for all of the local governmental units. (Source: ICPSR, retrieved 06/16/2011)

Employment and unemployment in the course of time. Problems of reintegration in work and contact with the employment office. Psycho-social problems of unemployment.

This is a four-wave panel.

Topics: 1st wave: The first wave of this investigation is at the same time the survey described under ZA Study No. 1083.

2nd wave: current employment status and changes since last survey; detailed chronological recording of times of employment or unemployment since last survey; agency arranging and frequency of temporary employment; re-employment with the same employer; type of activity during this interruption; employment from funds of a job creation measure; participation in course or retraining; successful conclusion and financial support of the course; improvement in occupational chances through retraining participation; reasons for non-participation (scale); self-assessment of current condition of health; illnesses and complaints; utilization of advice centers and medical treatment; psychological self-characterization of self-confidence and work orientation (scales); judgement on economic situation of the Federal Republic and one´s own economic situation; characterization of activity sought; income ideas; ideas about distance to place of work; list of circumstances that would be accepted in order to find work; type and extent of support received; intensity and evaluation of contact with the employment office; judgement on the case worker in the employment office in general and relative to the case of respondent (scale); number of jobs offered by the employment office; experiences with job offers obtained by the employment office as already filled or rejections received; independent search for work; number of applications; conversations with job counselor and case worker about further education and retraining; content characterization of counseling conversations (scale); attitude to unemployment and search for work (scale); detailed characterization of last occupational activity before respondent became unemployed; characterization of company; the route to work; information on dismissal; reason for dismissal; reduction in earning capacity; number of children under 14 years; children not of school-age; membership in a trade union; residential status; city size.

3rd wave: as so-called panel maintenance a brief questionnaire was sent to the respondent. In this mail survey (November 1980) the following questions were posed: current employment status; moving frequency; change of place of residence and distance of moving; reason for moving.

With respondents who had found employment in the meantime the following additional questions were posed: characterization of current occupational activity and information on training prerequisites as well as working hours and opportunity of doing overtime; characteristics of the job; means of transport and length of route to work; characterization of company; mediation by employment office; compromise solution or employment corresponding to expectations; comparison of current and previous job; usability of knowledge from earlier employment.

Demography: age; sex; marital status; number of children; babies; school education; vocational training; employment; household income; size of household; composition of household; respondent is head of household; division of household work; characteristics of head of household; city size; agricultural operation as second occupation; moves recently, move due to the new job and distance from old place of residence to new.

4th wave: assessment of economic situation; times of employment or unemployment from 1978 to 1981; assessment of occupational consequences of personal unemployment; reason for last unemployment; number of jobs offered by the employment office; one´s own initiative in the search for work; help taken advantage of for occupational reintegration; satisfaction with employment office and case worker; description of current employment situation; interest in regaining employment; part-time or full-time position; assessment whether it will be possible to obtain employment again in the next five years; decision for a specific activity or specific occupation; ideas on income; occupational mobility; reasonable difficulties or those one would accept in order to regain employment; current registration with the employment office as unemployed; reasons for not finding a suitable position (scale); sources of income for livelihood; assessment of condition of health; reduction in earning capacity; illnesses and complaints in the last three months; psychological self-characterization of self-confidence and work orientation (scales); moving frequency.

To those who in the meantime had found work the following questions were also posed: success of mediation by the employment office; temporary or permanent employment; detailed characterization of current activity and relationship to occupation learned; hours worked each week and overtime;...

United States US: Unemployment Rate data was reported at 4.350 % in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.867 % for 2016. United States US: Unemployment Rate data is updated yearly, averaging 5.571 % from Dec 1948 (Median) to 2017, with 70 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.708 % in 1982 and a record low of 2.925 % in 1953. United States US: Unemployment Rate data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by International Monetary Fund. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.IMF.IFS: Labour Force, Employment and Unemployment: Annual.

Unemployment Rate: Region: Metropolitan France data was reported at 8.700 % in Jun 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 8.900 % for Mar 2018. Unemployment Rate: Region: Metropolitan France data is updated quarterly, averaging 8.650 % from Mar 1982 (Median) to Jun 2018, with 146 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10.400 % in Jun 1997 and a record low of 6.400 % in Mar 1982. Unemployment Rate: Region: Metropolitan France data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies. The data is categorized under Global Database’s France – Table FR.G026: Unemployment: by Region and Zone.

The General Social Survey (GSS) conducts basic scientific research on the structure and development of American society with a data-collection program designed to both monitor societal change within the United States and to compare the United States to other nations. Begun in 1972, the GSS contains a standard 'core' of demographic, behavioral, and attitudinal questions, plus topics of special interest. Many of the core questions have remained unchanged since 1972 to facilitate time-trend studies as well as replication of earlier findings.

Unemployment Rate: Looking for Part Time Work: Married: 55-64 Years data was reported at 2.465 % in Jan 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 1.982 % for Dec 2024. Unemployment Rate: Looking for Part Time Work: Married: 55-64 Years data is updated monthly, averaging 2.543 % from Feb 1978 (Median) to Jan 2025, with 564 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 6.482 % in Sep 1983 and a record low of 0.882 % in Feb 1982. Unemployment Rate: Looking for Part Time Work: Married: 55-64 Years data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Australian Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.G043: Unemployment Rate: by Age, Sex and Status: Looking for Part Time Work.

United States Unemployment Rate: sa: Indiana data was reported at 3.500 % in Oct 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.500 % for Sep 2018. United States Unemployment Rate: sa: Indiana data is updated monthly, averaging 5.500 % from Jan 1976 (Median) to Oct 2018, with 514 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 12.600 % in Dec 1982 and a record low of 2.900 % in Oct 2000. United States Unemployment Rate: sa: Indiana data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.G058: Unemployment Rate: By State: Seasonally Adjusted.

France Unemployment Rate: Region: Grand Est data was reported at 8.600 % in Jun 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 8.800 % for Mar 2018. France Unemployment Rate: Region: Grand Est data is updated quarterly, averaging 8.100 % from Mar 1982 (Median) to Jun 2018, with 146 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10.400 % in Jun 2015 and a record low of 6.000 % in Mar 1982. France Unemployment Rate: Region: Grand Est data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies. The data is categorized under Global Database’s France – Table FR.G026: Unemployment: by Region and Zone.

The Volcker Shock was a period of historically high interest rates precipitated by Federal Reserve Chairperson Paul Volcker's decision to raise the central bank's key interest rate, the Fed funds effective rate, during the first three years of his term. Volcker was appointed chairperson of the Fed in August 1979 by President Jimmy Carter, as replacement for William Miller, who Carter had made his treasury secretary. Volcker was one of the most hawkish (supportive of tighter monetary policy to stem inflation) members of the Federal Reserve's committee, and quickly set about changing the course of monetary policy in the U.S. in order to quell inflation. The Volcker Shock is remembered for bringing an end to over a decade of high inflation in the United States, prompting a deep recession and high unemployment, and for spurring on debt defaults among developing countries in Latin America who had borrowed in U.S. dollars.

Monetary tightening and the recessions of the early '80s

Beginning in October 1979, Volcker's Fed tightened monetary policy by raising interest rates. This decision had the effect of depressing demand and slowing down the U.S. economy, as credit became more expensive for households and businesses. The Fed funds rate, the key overnight rate at which banks lend their excess reserves to each other, rose as high as 17.6 percent in early 1980. The rate was allowed to fall back below 10 percent following this first peak, however, due to worries that inflation was not falling fast enough, a second cycle of monetary tightening was embarked upon starting in August of 1980. The rate would reach its all-time peak in June of 1981, at 19.1 percent. The second recession sparked by these hikes was far deeper than the 1980 recession, with unemployment peaking at 10.8 percent in December 1980, the highest level since The Great Depression. This recession would drive inflation to a low point during Volcker's terms of 2.5 percent in August 1983.

The legacy of the Volcker Shock

By the end of Volcker's terms as Fed Chair, inflation was at a manageable rate of around four percent, while unemployment had fallen under six percent, as the economy grew and business confidence returned. While supporters of Volcker's actions point to these numbers as proof of the efficacy of his actions, critics have claimed that there were less harmful ways that inflation could have been brought under control. The recessions of the early 1980s are cited as accelerating deindustrialization in the U.S., as manufacturing jobs lost in 'rust belt' states such as Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania never returned during the years of recovery. The Volcker Shock was also a driving factor behind the Latin American debt crises of the 1980s, as governments in the region defaulted on debts which they had incurred in U.S. dollars. Debates about the validity of using interest rate hikes to get inflation under control have recently re-emerged due to the inflationary pressures facing the U.S. following the Coronavirus pandemic and the Federal Reserve's subsequent decision to embark on a course of monetary tightening.

Note: Because missing values are removed from this dataset, any form of non-response (e.g. valid skip, not stated) or don't know/refusal cannot be coded as a missing. The "Sysmiss" label in the Statistics section indicates the number of non-responding records for each variable, and the "Valid" values in the Statistics section indicate the number of responding records for each variable. The total number of records for each variable is comprised of both the sysmiss and valid values. The Labour Force Survey provides estimates of employment and unemployment which are among the most timely and important measures of performance of the Canadian economy. With the release of the survey results only 13 days after the completion of data collection, the LFS estimates are the first of the major monthly economic data series to be released. The Canadian Labour Force Survey was developed following the Second World War to satisfy a need for reliable and timely data on the labour market. Information was urgently required on the massive labour market changes involved in the transition from a war to a peace-time economy. The main objective of the LFS is to divide the working-age population into three mutually exclusive classifications - employed, unemployed, and not in the labour force - and to provide descriptive and explanatory data on each of these. LFS data are used to produce the well-known unemployment rate as well as other standard labour market indicators such as the employment rate and the participation rate. The LFS also provides employment estimates by industry, occupation, public and private sector, hours worked and much more, all cross-classifiable by a variety of demographic characteristics. Estimates are produced for Canada, the provinces, the territories and a large number of sub-provincial regions. For employees, wage rates, union status, job permanency and workplace size are also produced. These data are used by different levels of government for evaluation and planning of employment programs in Canada. Regional unemployment rates are used by Human Resources Development Canada to determine eligibility, level and duration of insurance benefits for persons living within a particular employment insurance region. The data are also used by labour market analysts, economists, consultants, planners, forecasters and academics in both the private and public sector.

The Swedish income panel was originally set up in the beginning of the 90s to make studies of how immigrants assimilate in the Swedish labour market possible. It consists of large samples of foreign-born and Swedish-born persons. Income information from registers is added for nearly 40 years. In addition income information relating to spouses is also available as well as for a subset of mothers and fathers. This makes it possible to construct measures of household income based on a relatively narrow definition. However, starting in 1998 there is also more information making it possible to include children over 18 and their incomes in the family. By matching with some different additional registers information has been added for people who have been unemployed or involved in labour market programmes during the 90s, on causes of deaths for people who have deceased since 1978 and on recent arrived immigrants from various origins. It has turned out that the data-base is quite useful for analysing research-questions other than originally motivating construction of the panel. The panel has been used for cross country comparisons of immigrants in the labour market and to analyse income mobility for different breakdowns of the population, and analyses the development in cohort income. There have been analyses of social assistance receipt among immigrants as well as studies of intergeneration mobility of income, the labour market situation of young immigrants and the second generation of immigrants. On-going work includes evaluation of labour market training programmes and studies of early retirement among immigrants. Planned work includes studies of the economic transition from child to adulthood during the 80s and 90s as well as studies of how frequent immigrant children are subject to measures under the Social Service Act and the Care of Youth Persons Act. The potentials of the Swedish Income Panel can be understood if one compares it with better known income-panels in other countries. For example SWIP covers more years and has a larger sample than the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP). On the other hand, the fact that information is obtained from registers only makes this Swedish panel less rich in variables. There are striking parallels between the Gothenburg Income Panel and the labour market panel at the Centre for Labour Market and Social Research in Aarhus for the Danish population.