This statistic shows the political preferences held by Asian-Americans in 2012, as distinguished by their countries of origin. 65 percent of Indian-Americans confirmed their political preference for the American Democratic party.

MORE RECENT DATA AVAILABLE HERE.This layer contains estimates and margins of error for 21 different Asian ethnicities by tract centroids. Data is from American Community Survey 2012-2016 5-year estimates, Table B02018. Ethnicities/fields are: Asian Indian, Bangladeshi, Bhutanese, Burmese, Cambodian, Chinese (except Taiwanese), Filipino, Hmong, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Laotian, Malaysian, Mongolian, Nepalese, Okinawan, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Taiwanese, Thai, Vietnamese, Other Asian - specified, and Other Asian - not specified.A filter is applied so that only tracts with at least 3 Asian Americans are displayed. Layer is symbolized with red firefly proportionally-graduated symbols, meant for a dark basemap. Accompanying web map also available.Nationally, the estimates and margins of error for these detailed Asian ethnicities are below: United StatesEstimateMargin of ErrorTotal Groups Tallied:20,337,346+/-27,363Asian Indian3,746,270+/-19,968Bangladeshi170,747+/-5,251Bhutanese27,399+/-2,669Burmese150,087+/-5,408Cambodian317,931+/-7,693Chinese, except Taiwanese4,558,129+/-24,665Filipino3,772,868+/-22,409Hmong289,461+/-5,593Indonesian110,286+/-4,239Japanese1,413,802+/-16,600Korean1,795,614+/-14,740Laotian262,832+/-6,798Malaysian30,626+/-1,882Mongolian22,390+/-1,940Nepalese126,668+/-5,072Okinawan12,614+/-1,057Pakistani476,963+/-11,358Sri Lankan54,260+/-2,685Taiwanese181,683+/-5,393Thai280,835+/-6,834Vietnamese1,948,720+/-20,616Other Asian, specified7,252+/-842Other Asian, not specified579,909+/-9,235

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2001 to 2012 for Winnebago Mental Health Institution vs. Wisconsin and Wisconsin Department Of Health Services School District

Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section...Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section..Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, it is the Census Bureau''s Population Estimates Program that produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns and estimates of housing units for states and counties..Explanation of Symbols:An ''**'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate..An ''-'' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''-'' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''+'' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution..An ''***'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate..An ''*****'' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate. .An ''N'' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small..An ''(X)'' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available..Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization..While the 2012 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities..This table has been updated to include additional categories for detailed Asian groups. Multi-year estimates for these additional detailed groups will be produced after three single years of data is tabulated (beginning with the first 1-year release in 2011)...Total includes people who reported Asian only, regardless of whether they reported one or more detailed Asian groups...Other Asian, specified. Includes respondents who provide a response of another Asian group not shown separately, such as Iwo Jiman, Maldivian, or Singaporean...Other Asian, not specified. Includes respondents who checked the "Other Asian" response category on the ACS questionnaire and did not write in a specific group or wrote in a generic term such as "Asian," or "Asiatic." ..Two or more Asian. Includes respondents who provided multiple Asian responses such as Asian Indian and Japanese; or Vietnamese, Chinese and Hmong...Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables..Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 American Community Survey

Verified reports of Asian tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) in the Gulf of Mexico from US Geological Survey's Nonindigenous Aquatic Species database. The first confirmed specimens of Asian tiger shrimp taken from the Gulf of Mexico were in December 2007. Introductions of tiger shrimp into the southeastern US are most likely explained by escapement from aquaculture facilities following flooding by storms and hurricanes, or through migration from areas where tiger shrimp have previously become established in the wild. Although they are less probable, other pathways of introduction (e.g. ballast water discharge) are also possible. Currently, the impacts of this invasive shrimp on the native fauna in areas where it has been introduced are uncertain.

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2006 to 2012 for Arts, Communication & Technology School vs. Oregon and Portland School District 1j

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 1989 to 2012 for Oxford Academy And Central School District vs. New York

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2011 to 2012 for A T Jones Math Science And Technology Academy vs. Florida and Hillsborough School District

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2011 to 2012 for Academy Of Medical & Health Sciences At Roosevelt vs. California and Los Angeles Unified School District

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 1989 to 2012 for Negaunee School District vs. Michigan

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2010 to 2012 for 281 Highview High School - I.S. vs. Minnesota and Intermediate School District 287

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2007 to 2012 for Savoy School District vs. Massachusetts

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 1991 to 2012 for Laona School District vs. Wisconsin

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2012 to 2013 for East Region Community School Of Greater La Mesa vs. California and San Diego County Office Of Education School District

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2008 to 2012 for Chickasaw School Of Mathematics And Science vs. Alabama and Mobile County School District

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2012 to 2021 for The Great Academy School District vs. New Mexico

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2000 to 2012 for Jonesport School District vs. Maine

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2004 to 2012 for Mt High Shoupp 10-12 vs. Utah and Davis School District

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2005 to 2012 for Crawford Idea High School vs. California and San Diego Unified School District

This dataset tracks annual asian student percentage from 2012 to 2023 for P.s. 189 vs. New York and New York City Geographic District # 6 School District