All addresses in Update Leave (TEA 6) enumeration areas were invited by an in-person lister to respond by internet, paper, or phone. This table is the daily and cumulative self-response and return rates by mode as well as undeliverable as addressed (UAA) rates for the nation..For more information about the different types of enumeration areas, go to the 2020 Census Type of Enumeration (TEA) viewer page by clicking here: Type of Enumeration Area..Self-response rates presented in this table may differ from those presented in the self-response map that was updated daily during the 2020 Census. The map used raw data as it was being processed in real-time while these rates used post processed data..To read the report that provides background information about the rate, go to the Evaluations, Experiments, and Assessment page on census.gov by clicking here: Evaluations Experiments and Assessments..Key Column Terms:.Daily – percentage of housing units whose self-responses were received on a particular date.Cumulative – percentage of housing units whose self-responses were received from the start of the census through a particular date.Internet – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet questionnaire.Paper – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by paper questionnaire.CQA – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by phone.Total – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Self-Response Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Return Rate – percentage of occupied housing units in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.UAA Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response areas (TEA 1) identified as undeliverable as addressed (UAA).NOTE: The Census Bureau's Disclosure Review Board and Disclosure Avoidance Officers have reviewed this information product for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and have approved the disclosure avoidance practices applied to this release. (CBDRB-FY24-0271).Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census

All addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) enumeration areas were invited by mail to respond by internet, paper, or phone. This table is the daily and cumulative self-response and return rates by mode as well as undeliverable as addressed (UAA) rates for the nation..For more information about the different types of enumeration areas, go to the 2020 Census Type of Enumeration (TEA) viewer page by clicking here: Type of Enumeration Area..Self-response rates presented in this table may differ from those presented in the self-response map that was updated daily during the 2020 Census. The map used raw data as it was being processed in real-time while these rates used post processed data..To read the report that provides background information about the rate, go to the Evaluations, Experiments, and Assessment page on census.gov by clicking here: Evaluations Experiments and Assessments..Key Column Terms:.Daily – percentage of housing units whose self-responses were received on a particular date.Cumulative – percentage of housing units whose self-responses were received from the start of the census through a particular date.Internet – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet questionnaire.Paper – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by paper questionnaire.CQA – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by phone.Total – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Self-Response Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Return Rate – percentage of occupied housing units in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.UAA Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response areas (TEA 1) identified as undeliverable as addressed (UAA).NOTE: The Census Bureau's Disclosure Review Board and Disclosure Avoidance Officers have reviewed this information product for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and have approved the disclosure avoidance practices applied to this release. (CBDRB-FY24-0271).Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census

All addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) and Update Leave (TEA 6) enumeration areas were invited to respond by internet, paper, or phone. Within these areas, tracts were delineated to either an English or bilingual questionnaire based on demographic characteristics. This table is the daily and cumulative self-response and return rates for the bilingual questionnaire by mode as well as undeliverable as addressed (UAA) rates for the nation..For more information about the different types of enumeration areas, go to the 2020 Census Type of Enumeration (TEA) viewer page by clicking here: Type of Enumeration Area..Self-response rates presented in this table may differ from those presented in the self-response map that was updated daily during the 2020 Census. The map used raw data as it was being processed in real-time while these rates used post processed data..To read the report that provides background information about the rate, go to the Evaluations, Experiments, and Assessment page on census.gov by clicking here: Evaluations Experiments and Assessments..Key Column Terms:.Daily – percentage of housing units whose self-responses were received on a particular date.Cumulative – percentage of housing units whose self-responses were received from the start of the census through a particular date.Internet – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet questionnaire.Paper – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by paper questionnaire.CQA – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by phone.Total – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Self-Response Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Return Rate – percentage of occupied housing units in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.UAA Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response areas (TEA 1) identified as undeliverable as addressed (UAA).NOTE: The Census Bureau's Disclosure Review Board and Disclosure Avoidance Officers have reviewed this information product for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and have approved the disclosure avoidance practices applied to this release. (CBDRB-FY24-0271).Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census

The Community Resilience Estimates (CRE) program provides an easily understood metric for how socially vulnerable every neighborhood in the United States is to the impacts of disasters.This ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census, CRE, and ACS when using this data.Overview:Community resilience is the capacity of individuals and households within a community to prepare, absorb, respond, and recover from a disaster. Local planners, policy makers, public health officials, emergency managers, and community stakeholders need a variety of estimates to help assess the potential resiliency and vulnerabilities of communities and their constituent populations to help prepare and plan mitigation, recovery, and response strategies. Community Resilience Estimates (CRE) focuses on developing a tool to identify socio-economic vulnerabilities within populations. The 2022 Community Resilience Estimates (CRE) are produced using information on individuals and households from the 2022 American Community Survey (ACS) and the Census Bureau’s Population Estimates Program (PEP). The CRE uses small area modeling techniques that can be used for a broad range of disaster related events (hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, economic shocks, etc.) to identify population concentrations likely to be relatively more impacted by and have greater difficulties overcoming disasters.The end result is a data product which measures social vulnerability more accurately, timely, and address equity concerns differently than other measures.The CRE for Equity dataset provides information about the nation, states, counties, and census tracts from four different data sources. These sources include the Community Resilience Estimates, the American Community Survey, the 2020 Census, and the Census Bureau’s Planning Database. Providing all this information in one dataset allows users quick access to the data on a variety of topics concerning social vulnerability and equity.Data:The ACS is a nationally representative survey with data on the characteristics of the U.S. population. The sample is selected from all counties and county-equivalents and has a sample size of about 3.5 million housing units each year. It is the premier source for timely and detailed population and housing information about our nation and its communities. We also use auxiliary data from the PEP, the Census Bureau’s program that produces and publishes estimates of the population living at a given time within a geographic entity in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. We use population data from the PEP by age group, race and ethnicity, and sex. Since the PEP does not go down to the census tract level, the CRE uses the Public Law 94-171 summary files (PL94) and Demographic Housing Characteristics File (DHC) tables from the 2020 Decennial Census to help produce the population base estimates. Once the weighted estimates are tabulated, small area modeling techniques are used to create the estimates for the CRE. Components of Social Vulnerability (SV): Resilience to a disaster is partly determined by the components of social vulnerability exhibited within a community’s population. To measure these components and construct the community resilience estimates, we designed population estimates based on individual- and household-level components of social vulnerability. These components are binary indicators or variables that add up to a maximum of 10 possible components using data from the ACS. The specific ACS-defined measures we use are as follows: Components of Social Vulnerability (SV) for Households (HH) and Individuals (I):SV 1: Income-to-Poverty Ratio (IPR) < 130 percent (HH). SV 2: Single or zero caregiver household - only one or no individuals living in the household who are 18-64 (HH). SV 3: Unit-level crowding with >= 0.75 persons per room (HH). SV 4: Communication barrier defined as either: Limited English-speaking households1 (HH) orNo one in the household over the age of 16 with a high school diploma (HH). SV 5: No one in the household is employed full-time, year-round. The flag is not applied if all residents of the household are aged 65 years or older (HH). SV 6: Disability posing constraint to significant life activity. Persons who report having any one of the six disability types (I): hearing difficulty, vision difficulty, cognitive difficulty, ambulatory difficulty, self-care difficulty, and independent living difficulty. SV 7: No health insurance coverage (I). SV 8: Being aged 65 years or older (I). SV 9: No vehicle access (HH). SV 10: Households without broadband internet access (HH). Each individual is assigned a 0 or 1 for each of the components based upon their individual or household attributes listed above. It is important to note that SV 4 is not double flagged. An individual will be assigned a 1, if either of the characteristics is true for their household. For example, if a household is linguistically isolated and no one over the age of 16 has attained a high school diploma or more education, the household members are only flagged once. The result is an index that produces aggregate-level (tract, county, and state) small area estimates: the CRE. The CRE provide an estimate for the number of people with a specific number of social vulnerabilities. In its current data file layout form, the estimates are categorized into three groups: zero , one-two, or three plus social vulnerability components. Differences with CRE 2021:The number of census tracts have increased from 84,414 in CRE 2021 to 84,415 in CRE 2022. This is due to the boundary changes in Connecticut implemented in 2022 census data products. To accommodate the boundary change, Connecticut also now has nine planning regions instead of eight counties in CRE 2022.To avoid confusion, the modeled rates are now set to equal zero in CRE 2022 for geographic areas with zero population in universe. To improve the population base estimates, CRE 2022 uses more detailed decennial estimates from the 2020 DHC in addition to PL94, whereas CRE 2021 just used PL94 due to availability at the time. See “2022 Community Resilience Estimates: Detailed Technical Documentation” for more information. Data Processing Notes:Boundaries come from the Cartographic Boundaries via US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates, and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). This dataset does not contain values for Puerto Rico or Island Areas at any level of geography.Further Information:Community Resilience Estimates Program Website https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/community-resilience-estimates.htmlCommunity Resilience Estimates Technical Documentation https://census.gov/programs-surveys/community-resilience-estimates/technical-documentation.htmlFor Data Questionssehsd.cre@census.gov

All addresses in Self Response enumeration areas (TEA 1) received one of two mailing strategies – Internet First or Internet Choice. This table is the daily and cumulative self-response and return rates by mode as well as undeliverable as addressed (UAA) rates for all addresses in areas receiving the Internet Choice mailing..For more information about the different types of enumeration areas, go to the 2020 Census Type of Enumeration (TEA) viewer page by clicking here: Type of Enumeration Area..Internet Choice mailings:.Mailing 1 – Letter and Questionnaire.Mailing 2 – Letter.Mailing 3 – Postcard.Mailing 4 – Letter and Questionnaire.Mailing 5 – “It’s Not Too Late Postcard”.Mailing 6 – Pre-NRFU COVID-19 Postcard.Mailing 7 – Letter and Questionnaire.Mailings 3-7 were targeted to nonrespondents.Mailings 6 and 7 were added during the census due to the COVID-19 pandemic.For more information about the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 2020 Census, click here: COVID-19 Decennial Census..Self-response rates presented in this table may differ from those presented in the self-response map that was updated daily during the 2020 Census. The map used raw data as it was being processed in real-time while these rates used post processed data..To read the report that provides background information about the rate, go to the Evaluations, Experiments, and Assessment page on census.gov by clicking here: Evaluations Experiments and Assessments..Key Column Terms:.Daily – percentage of housing units whose self-responses were received on a particular date.Cumulative – percentage of housing units whose self-responses were received from the start of the census through a particular date.Internet – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet questionnaire.Paper – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by paper questionnaire.CQA – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by phone.Total – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Self-Response Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Return Rate – percentage of occupied housing units in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.UAA Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response areas (TEA 1) identified as undeliverable as addressed (UAA).NOTE: The Census Bureau's Disclosure Review Board and Disclosure Avoidance Officers have reviewed this information product for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and have approved the disclosure avoidance practices applied to this release. (CBDRB-FY24-0271).Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census

Annual Resident Population Estimates by Age Group, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin; for the United States, States, Counties; and for Puerto Rico and its Municipios: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2019 // Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division // The contents of this file are released on a rolling basis from December through June. // Note: 'In combination' means in combination with one or more other races. The sum of the five race-in-combination groups adds to more than the total population because individuals may report more than one race. Hispanic origin is considered an ethnicity, not a race. Hispanics may be of any race. Responses of 'Some Other Race' from the 2010 Census are modified. This results in differences between the population for specific race categories shown for the 2010 Census population in this file versus those in the original 2010 Census data. The estimates are based on the 2010 Census and reflect changes to the April 1, 2010 population due to the Count Question Resolution program and geographic program revisions. // Current data on births, deaths, and migration are used to calculate population change since the 2010 Census. An annual time series of estimates is produced, beginning with the census and extending to the vintage year. The vintage year (e.g., Vintage 2019) refers to the final year of the time series. The reference date for all estimates is July 1, unless otherwise specified. With each new issue of estimates, the entire estimates series is revised. Additional information, including historical and intercensal estimates, evaluation estimates, demographic analysis, research papers, and methodology is available on website: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest.html.

All addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) and Update Leave (TEA 6) enumeration areas were invited to respond by internet, paper, or phone. The table is the county-level self-response and return rates by mode as well as undeliverable as addressed (UAA) rates for the nation at the start of NRFU (August 10, 2020) and the end of response processing (December 1, 2020). Self-response, return, and UAA rates from the 2010 Census at the NRFU cut date (April 19, 2010) and the end of response processing (September 7, 2010) are included to compare rates between censuses..For more information about the different types of enumeration areas, go to the 2020 Census Type of Enumeration (TEA) viewer page by clicking here: Type of Enumeration Area..Self-response rates presented in this table may differ from those presented in the self-response map that was updated daily during the 2020 Census. The map used raw data as it was being processed in real-time while these rates used post processed data..To read the report that provides background information about the rate, go to the Evaluations, Experiments, and Assessment page on census.gov by clicking here: Evaluations Experiments and Assessments..Key Column Terms:.NRFU (2020) – self-responses received by August 10, 2020.NRFU (2010) – self-responses received by April 19, 2010.Final (2020) – self-responses received by the end of response processing (December 1, 2020).Final (2010) – self-responses received by the end of response processing (September 7, 2010).Internet – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet questionnaire.Paper – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by paper questionnaire.CQA – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by phone.Total – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Self-Response Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Return Rate – percentage of occupied housing units in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.UAA Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response areas (TEA 1) identified as undeliverable as addressed (UAA).NOTE: The Census Bureau's Disclosure Review Board and Disclosure Avoidance Officers have reviewed this information product for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and have approved the disclosure avoidance practices applied to this release. (CBDRB-FY24-0271).Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census

Annual Resident Population Estimates by Age Group, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2015 // Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division // The contents of this file are released on a rolling basis from December through June. // Note: 'In combination' means in combination with one or more other races. The sum of the five race-in-combination groups adds to more than the total population because individuals may report more than one race. Hispanic origin is considered an ethnicity, not a race. Hispanics may be of any race. Responses of 'Some Other Race' from the 2010 Census are modified. This results in differences between the population for specific race categories shown for the 2010 Census population in this file versus those in the original 2010 Census data. For more information, see https://www.census.gov/popest/data/historical/files/MRSF-01-US1.pdf. // The estimates are based on the 2010 Census and reflect changes to the April 1, 2010 population due to the Count Question Resolution program and geographic program revisions. // For detailed information about the methods used to create the population estimates, see https://www.census.gov/popest/methodology/index.html. // Each year, the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program (PEP) utilizes current data on births, deaths, and migration to calculate population change since the most recent decennial census, and produces a time series of estimates of population. The annual time series of estimates begins with the most recent decennial census data and extends to the vintage year. The vintage year (e.g., V2015) refers to the final year of the time series. The reference date for all estimates is July 1, unless otherwise specified. With each new issue of estimates, the Census Bureau revises estimates for years back to the last census. As each vintage of estimates includes all years since the most recent decennial census, the latest vintage of data available supersedes all previously produced estimates for those dates. The Population Estimates Program provides additional information including historical and intercensal estimates, evaluation estimates, demographic analysis, and research papers on its website: https://www.census.gov/popest/index.html.

Annual State Resident Population Estimates for 6 Race Groups (5 Race Alone Groups and Two or More Races) by Age, Sex, and Hispanic Origin: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013 // File: 7/1/2013 State Characteristics Population Estimates // Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division // Release Date: June 2014 // Note: The estimates are based on the 2010 Census and reflect changes to the April 1, 2010 population due to the Count Question Resolution program and geographic program revisions. Hispanic origin is considered an ethnicity, not a race. Hispanics may be of any race. Responses of 'Some Other Race' from the 2010 Census are modified. This results in differences between the population for specific race categories shown for the 2010 Census population in this file versus those in the original 2010 Census data. For more information, see http://www.census.gov/popest/data/historical/files/MRSF-01-US1.pdf. // For detailed information about the methods used to create the population estimates, see http://www.census.gov/popest/methodology/index.html. // Each year, the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program (PEP) utilizes current data on births, deaths, and migration to calculate population change since the most recent decennial census, and produces a time series of estimates of population. The annual time series of estimates begins with the most recent decennial census data and extends to the vintage year. The vintage year (e.g., V2013) refers to the final year of the time series. The reference date for all estimates is July 1, unless otherwise specified. With each new issue of estimates, the Census Bureau revises estimates for years back to the last census. As each vintage of estimates includes all years since the most recent decennial census, the latest vintage of data available supersedes all previously produced estimates for those dates. The Population Estimates Program provides additional information including historical and intercensal estimates, evaluation estimates, demographic analysis, and research papers on its website: http://www.census.gov/popest/index.html.

Monthly Population Estimates by Universe, Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin for the United States: April 1, 2010 to December 1, 2016 // Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division // The contents of this file are released on a rolling basis from December through June. // Note: 'In combination' means in combination with one or more other races. The sum of the five race-in-combination groups adds to more than the total population because individuals may report more than one race. Hispanic origin is considered an ethnicity, not a race. Hispanics may be of any race. Responses of 'Some Other Race' from the 2010 Census are modified. This results in differences between the population for specific race categories shown for the 2010 Census population in this file versus those in the original 2010 Census data. For more information, see https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology/modified-race-summary-file-method/mrsf2010.pdf. // The estimates are based on the 2010 Census and reflect changes to the April 1, 2010 population due to the Count Question Resolution program and geographic program revisions. // Persons on active duty in the Armed Forces were not enumerated in the 2010 Census. Therefore, variables for the 2010 Census civilian, civilian noninstitutionalized, and resident population plus Armed Forces overseas populations cannot be derived and are not available on these files. // For detailed information about the methods used to create the population estimates, see https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology.html. // Each year, the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program (PEP) utilizes current data on births, deaths, and migration to calculate population change since the most recent decennial census, and produces a time series of estimates of population. The annual time series of estimates begins with the most recent decennial census data and extends to the vintage year. The vintage year (e.g., V2015) refers to the final year of the time series. The reference date for all estimates is July 1, unless otherwise specified. With each new issue of estimates, the Census Bureau revises estimates for years back to the last census. As each vintage of estimates includes all years since the most recent decennial census, the latest vintage of data available supersedes all previously produced estimates for those dates. The Population Estimates Program provides additional information including historical and intercensal estimates, evaluation estimates, demographic analysis, and research papers on its website: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest.html.

The 2020 APS Employee Census was administered to all available Australian Public Service (APS) employees, running from 12 October to 13 November 2020. This was delayed from the usual May to June timeframe due to the impact of COVID-19.

The Employee Census provides a comprehensive view of the APS and ensures no eligible respondents are omitted from the survey sample, removing sampling bias and reducing sample error. The Census' content is designed to establish the views of APS employees on workplace issues such as leadership, learning and development, and job satisfaction.

Overall, 108,085 APS employees responded to the Employee Census in 2020, a response rate of 78%.

Please be aware that the very large number of respondents to the employee census means these files are over 200MB in size. Downloading and opening these files may take some time.

TECHNICAL NOTES

Three files are available for download.

• 2020 APS Employee Census - Questionnaire: This contains the 2020 APS Employee Census questionnaire.

• 2020 APS Employee Census - 5 point dataset.csv: This file contains individual responses to the 2020 APS Employee Census as clean, tabular data as required by data.gov.au. This will need to be used in conjunction with the above document.

• 2020 APS Employee Census - 5 point dataset.sav: This file contains individual responses to the 2020 APS Employee Census for use with the SPSS software package.

To protect the privacy and confidentiality of respondents to the 2020 APS Employee Census, the datasets provided on data.gov.au include responses to a limited number of demographic or other attribute questions.

Full citation of this dataset should list the Australian Public Service Commission (APSC) as the author. A recommended short citation is: 2020 APS Employee Census data, Australian Public Service Commission.

Any queries can be directed to research@apsc.gov.au.

All addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) and Update Leave (TEA 6) enumeration areas were invited to respond by internet, paper, or phone. The table is the cumulative self-response and return rates by mode as well as undeliverable as addressed (UAA) rates for the nation at the start of NRFU (August 10) and the end of response processing (December 1)..For more information about the different types of enumeration areas, go to the 2020 Census Type of Enumeration (TEA) viewer page by clicking here: Type of Enumeration Area..Self-response rates presented in this table may differ from those presented in the self-response map that was updated daily during the 2020 Census. The map used raw data as it was being processed in real-time while these rates used post processed data..To read the report that provides background information about the rate, go to the Evaluations, Experiments, and Assessment page on census.gov by clicking here: Evaluations Experiments and Assessments..Key Column Terms:.Start of NRFU – self-responses received by August 10.Final – self-responses received by the end of response processing (December 1).Internet – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet questionnaire.Paper – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by paper questionnaire.CQA – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by phone.Total – percentage of housing units providing a self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Self-Response Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.Return Rate – percentage of occupied housing units in Self Response (TEA 1) or Update Leave (TEA 6) areas providing a sufficient self-response by internet, paper, or phone.UAA Rate – percentage of addresses in Self Response areas (TEA 1) identified as undeliverable as addressed (UAA).NOTE: The Census Bureau's Disclosure Review Board and Disclosure Avoidance Officers have reviewed this information product for unauthorized disclosure of confidential information and have approved the disclosure avoidance practices applied to this release. (CBDRB-FY24-0271).Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census

Graph and download economic data for E-Commerce Retail Sales as a Percent of Total Sales (ECOMPCTSA) from Q4 1999 to Q4 2024 about e-commerce, retail trade, percent, sales, retail, and USA.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Clear Lake population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Clear Lake. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Clear Lake by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Clear Lake.

Key observations

The largest age group in Clear Lake, IA was for the group of age 65-69 years with a population of 899 (11.72%), according to the 2021 American Community Survey. At the same time, the smallest age group in Clear Lake, IA was the 30-34 years with a population of 216 (2.82%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Clear Lake is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Clear Lake total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Clear Lake Population by Age. You can refer the same here

To collect this data, an Internet-wide IP address sweep was conducted. Every IP address in the ranges allocated by IANA was pinged once by sending ICMP ECHO_REQUEST (PING) packet. If the response (ICMP_ECHO_REPLY) came, its IP address was recorded in this data-set. In all, over 2.5 billion distinct IP addresses were probed during this experiment.

Annual Resident Population Estimates by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin; for the United States, States, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2019 // Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division // The contents of this file are released on a rolling basis from December through June. // Note: 'In combination' means in combination with one or more other races. The sum of the five race-in-combination groups adds to more than the total population because individuals may report more than one race. Hispanic origin is considered an ethnicity, not a race. Hispanics may be of any race. Responses of 'Some Other Race' from the 2010 Census are modified. This results in differences between the population for specific race categories shown for the 2010 Census population in this file versus those in the original 2010 Census data. The estimates are based on the 2010 Census and reflect changes to the April 1, 2010 population due to the Count Question Resolution program and geographic program revisions. // Current data on births, deaths, and migration are used to calculate population change since the 2010 Census. An annual time series of estimates is produced, beginning with the census and extending to the vintage year. The vintage year (e.g., Vintage 2019) refers to the final year of the time series. The reference date for all estimates is July 1, unless otherwise specified. With each new issue of estimates, the entire estimates series is revised. Additional information, including historical and intercensal estimates, evaluation estimates, demographic analysis, research papers, and methodology is available on website: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest.html.

In 1800, the population of the area of modern-day Bangladesh was estimated to be just over 19 million, a figure which would rise steadily throughout the 19th century, reaching over 26 million by 1900. At the time, Bangladesh was the eastern part of the Bengal region in the British Raj, and had the most-concentrated Muslim population in the subcontinent's east. At the turn of the 20th century, the British colonial administration believed that east Bengal was economically lagging behind the west, and Bengal was partitioned in 1905 as a means of improving the region's development. East Bengal then became the only Muslim-majority state in the eastern Raj, which led to socioeconomic tensions between the Hindu upper classes and the general population. Bengal Famine During the Second World War, over 2.5 million men from across the British Raj enlisted in the British Army and their involvement was fundamental to the war effort. The war, however, had devastating consequences for the Bengal region, as the famine of 1943-1944 resulted in the deaths of up to three million people (with over two thirds thought to have been in the east) due to starvation and malnutrition-related disease. As the population boomed in the 1930s, East Bengal's mismanaged and underdeveloped agricultural sector could not sustain this growth; by 1942, food shortages spread across the region, millions began migrating in search of food and work, and colonial mismanagement exacerbated this further. On the brink of famine in early-1943, authorities in India called for aid and permission to redirect their own resources from the war effort to combat the famine, however these were mostly rejected by authorities in London. While the exact extent of each of these factors on causing the famine remains a topic of debate, the general consensus is that the British War Cabinet's refusal to send food or aid was the most decisive. Food shortages did not dissipate until late 1943, however famine deaths persisted for another year. Partition to independence Following the war, the movement for Indian independence reached its final stages as the process of British decolonization began. Unrest between the Raj's Muslim and Hindu populations led to the creation of two separate states in1947; the Muslim-majority regions became East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and West Pakistan (now Pakistan), separated by the Hindu-majority India. Although East Pakistan's population was larger, power lay with the military in the west, and authorities grew increasingly suppressive and neglectful of the eastern province in the following years. This reached a tipping point when authorities failed to respond adequately to the Bhola cyclone in 1970, which claimed over half a million lives in the Bengal region, and again when they failed to respect the results of the 1970 election, in which the Bengal party Awami League won the majority of seats. Bangladeshi independence was claimed the following March, leading to a brutal war between East and West Pakistan that claimed between 1.5 and three million deaths in just nine months. The war also saw over half of the country displaced, widespread atrocities, and the systematic rape of hundreds of thousands of women. As the war spilled over into India, their forces joined on the side of Bangladesh, and Pakistan was defeated two weeks later. An additional famine in 1974 claimed the lives of several hundred thousand people, meaning that the early 1970s was one of the most devastating periods in the country's history. Independent Bangladesh In the first decades of independence, Bangladesh's political hierarchy was particularly unstable and two of its presidents were assassinated in military coups. Since transitioning to parliamentary democracy in the 1990s, things have become comparatively stable, although political turmoil, violence, and corruption are persistent challenges. As Bangladesh continues to modernize and industrialize, living standards have increased and individual wealth has risen. Service industries have emerged to facilitate the demands of Bangladesh's developing economy, while manufacturing industries, particularly textiles, remain strong. Declining fertility rates have seen natural population growth fall in recent years, although the influx of Myanmar's Rohingya population due to the displacement crisis has seen upwards of one million refugees arrive in the country since 2017. In 2020, it is estimated that Bangladesh has a population of approximately 165 million people.

A comparison of mass testing event attendee and U.S. Census tract demographic characteristics in the two study communities.

During the eighteenth century, it is estimated that France's population grew by roughly fifty percent, from 19.7 million in 1700, to 29 million by 1800. In France itself, the 1700s are remembered for the end of King Louis XIV's reign in 1715, the Age of Enlightenment, and the French Revolution. During this century, the scientific and ideological advances made in France and across Europe challenged the leadership structures of the time, and questioned the relationship between monarchial, religious and political institutions and their subjects. France was arguably the most powerful nation in the world in these early years, with the second largest population in Europe (after Russia); however, this century was defined by a number of costly, large-scale conflicts across Europe and in the new North American theater, which saw the loss of most overseas territories (particularly in North America) and almost bankrupted the French crown. A combination of regressive taxation, food shortages and enlightenment ideologies ultimately culminated in the French Revolution in 1789, which brought an end to the Ancien Régime, and set in motion a period of self-actualization.

War and peace

After a volatile and tumultuous decade, in which tens of thousands were executed by the state (most infamously: guillotined), relative stability was restored within France as Napoleon Bonaparte seized power in 1799, and the policies of the revolution became enforced. Beyond France's borders, the country was involved in a series of large scale wars for two almost decades, and the First French Empire eventually covered half of Europe by 1812. In 1815, Napoleon was defeated outright, the empire was dissolved, and the monarchy was restored to France; nonetheless, a large number of revolutionary and Napoleonic reforms remained in effect afterwards, and the ideas had a long-term impact across the globe. France experienced a century of comparative peace in the aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars; there were some notable uprisings and conflicts, and the monarchy was abolished yet again, but nothing on the scale of what had preceded or what was to follow. A new overseas colonial empire was also established in the late 1800s, particularly across Africa and Southeast Asia. Through most of the eighteenth and nineteenth century, France had the second largest population in Europe (after Russia), however political instability and the economic prioritization of Paris meant that the entire country did not urbanize or industrialize at the same rate as the other European powers. Because of this, Germany and Britain entered the twentieth century with larger populations, and other regions, such as Austria or Belgium, had overtaken France in terms of industrialization; the German annexation of Alsace-Lorraine in the Franco-Prussian War was also a major contributor to this.

World Wars and contemporary France

Coming into the 1900s, France had a population of approximately forty million people (officially 38 million* due to to territorial changes), and there was relatively little growth in the first half of the century. France was comparatively unprepared for a large scale war, however it became one of the most active theaters of the First World War when Germany invaded via Belgium in 1914, with the ability to mobilize over eight million men. By the war's end in 1918, France had lost almost 1.4 million in the conflict, and approximately 300,000 in the Spanish Flu pandemic that followed. Germany invaded France again during the Second World War, and occupied the country from 1940, until the Allied counter-invasion liberated the country during the summer of 1944. France lost around 600,000 people in the course of the war, over half of which were civilians. Following the war's end, the country experienced a baby boom, and the population grew by approximately twenty million people in the next fifty years (compared to just one million in the previous fifty years). Since the 1950s, France's economy quickly grew to be one of the strongest in the world, despite losing the vast majority of its overseas colonial empire by the 1970s. A wave of migration, especially from these former colonies, has greatly contributed to the growth and diversity of France's population today, which stands at over 65 million people in 2020.

Equity Atlas Data Description

Geographies Background:

Census Tract populations range from 1,200 to 8,000, have an average population of 4,000, and are intended to be relatively homogeneous units with respect to the resident population’s characteristics, economic status, and housing conditions. There are 375 Census Tracts completely within Bexar County. Census Tracts do not follow the CoSA boundary. Both Decennial Census and ACS Tract level data are available for Bexar County.

Blocks are the smallest subdivisions of Tracts. They are typically bounded by visible features like roads and boundaries like city limits. They can have populations that vary from zero to several hundred, such as when an apartment complex occupies the entire area. Blocks are the smallest geographic unit used by the Census Bureau for tabulation of 100-percent data (Data collected from all houses such as in the Decennial Census). There are 23,698 Blocks in Bexar County, 18,629 of which had a population of at least one and as much as 5,052 in the 2020 Decennial Census.

Demographic Data Background:

The U.S. Census Bureau’s Decennial Census is conducted once every ten years. During the Decennial Census, the Census Bureau strives to count every single person and every single residence using what was, prior to 2010, known as the “Short Form.” Decennial Census data are released down to the Census Block level. The data provided in the Decennial Census is much more accurate than the data available from the American Community Survey (ACS), which replaces what was known as the Decennial Census “Long Form.” However, since the Decennial Census is only conducted once every 10-years, the data are not as up to date as that provided by the ACS (Except for the year of Decennial Census data release).

The U.S. Census Bureau’s ACS sends out approximately 3.5-million surveys to nationwide households annually, approximately 135 households per Tract, nationwide, over a 5-year period. The ACS has a final approximate response rate of 67%, or 2.3-million surveys. This means that approximately 13,300 or 1.85% of 717,124 Total Households (Per 2021 ACS 5-Year estimates) in Bexar County respond to an ACS survey in a single year.

ACS 5-year estimates include survey results from 5-years, such as from 2017 to 2021 for the 2021 ACS 5-year estimates. The approximate 66,502 or 9.27% of Total Households within Bexar County responding to the ACS survey over a 5-years period, are the basis for numbers released that represent all households in the county. While the ACS data are more up-to date then Decennial Census data, they are less accurate due to the small sample size and Margin of Error.

Several 2021 ACS 5-Year Estimates tables were used to create the EquityScore GIS data layer attribute table, and the Equity Atlas companion data tables, EquityScoreAdditionalVariables and EquityScoreSpecialVariables. Those ACS tables are:

1. DP02 SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE UNITED STATES

2. DP04 SELECTED HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

3. DP05 ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES

4. S1701 POVERTY STATUS IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS

5. S1903 MEDIAN INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS (IN 2017 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS)

Split Tracts and Data Allocation:

A couple of issue arise with using the more up to data annually released ACS Census Tract estimates. These issues involve splitting Tracts and allocating demographic values between the split portions of Tracts.

First, Census Tract boundaries do not align with the CoSA boundary, and some Tracts are thus split by the CoSA boundary. To address this, when the portion of a Tract intersecting the CoSA was reduced to a very small area (e.g., Less than 10 Acres) or the intersecting portion is very long and exceedingly narrow sliver, those areas were merged with adjacent Tracts within the CoSA to avoid map clutter. The demographic data of the merged small area/sliver (Typically small counts, if any) do not convey to the Tract with which it was merged since it is important that the demographic values allocated to the portions of split Tracts add up to the original Tract’s values for quality assurance procedures. Instead, that value was added to the majority area portion of the original Tract that is outside the CoSA.

Second, the count values (e.g., Total Population, Race/Ethnicity, High School Education…) of a split by the CoSA boundary Tract need to be divided between the sub-portions of the Tract in a way that acknowledges the fact that population is often not evenly distributed within Tract areas. To address this, two allocation methods were used. The Dasymetric Allocation method divided the 2021 ACS 5-year Tract estimates values within its source Track, based on the 2020 Decennial Census total population values of sub-Tracts area Blocks. For instance, if Tract 1 had 10% of its 2020 Decennial Census Total Population within its Block A, then Block A would be assigned 10% of that Tract’s 2021 ACS Total Population. This methodology approximates population densities within a Tract. For variables with averages rather than counts (e.g., Median Household Incomes), portions of split Tracts retain the original values.

Blocks can also be split by the CoSA boundary. To address this, the Areal Allocation method divided split sub-Tract Block areas based on the percentage of the total area within or without the CoSA boundary. For instance, if a Block had a Dasymetric Allocation assigned Total Population value of 200, and that Block was split so that 75% of its area was in the CoSA, then that portion of the Block intersecting the CoSA was assigned a Total Population value of 150.

Equity Score Assignment:

Following the Split Tract Data Allocation, the CoSA Total Population was calculated as being 1,440,704. This value must be used rather than the Census Bureau’s ACS 5-Year estimate Total Population for the CoSA, 1,434,540, since the allocated values for all the Tracts must add up to the Total Population value. Discrepancies between the allocated from Tracts with the CoSA Boundary value and the Census Bureau CoSA value are minor (+6,164) and at least partly attributable to CoSA boundary changes in recent years (Census Bureau does not update their boundaries as frequently). For the People of Color, Median Household Income, Education and Language Equity Scores, the goal is to have approximately 20-percent of the Tract allocated CoSA Total Population, 288,141, in each of the 5 Equity scores (1-5) for a particular variable.

People of Color<span style='font-size:12.0pt;