According to exit polling in *** key states of the 2024 presidential election in the United States, almost ********** of voters who had never attended college reported voting for Donald Trump. In comparison, a similar share of voters with ******** degrees reported voting for Kamala Harris.

According to a September 2024 survey of adults in the United States, ** percent of those with a college degree said that they were definitely voting in the 2024 presidential election. In comparison, only ** percent of those without college degrees were definitely planning to vote in November.

According to exit polling in ten key states of the 2024 presidential election in the United States, ** percent of voters with a 2023 household income of ****** U.S. dollars or less reported voting for Donald Trump. In comparison, ** percent of voters with a total family income of 100,000 to ******* U.S. dollars reported voting for Kamala Harris.

Candidates in European parliament elections, in numbers and percent by sex, level of education, observations and election year

In the first round of the French legislative elections in 2024, ** percent of voters who graduated with a diploma inferior to the baccalaureate level voted for the National Rally. However, the more educated the voters were, the less likely they were to vote for the far-right party. By contrast, the New Popular Front vote share grew proportionally with a voters' diploma level. For instance, ** percent of people who graduated with a higher education degree voted for the leftist coalition.

The data include views on Finland's 2024 presidential election, collected from the same respondents in three rounds of surveys. The data was collected as part of the Public Opinion Panel, which is part of The Finnish Research Infrastructure for Public Opinion (FIRIPO). The survey started by asking respondents about their voting behaviour, for example whether they planned to vote in the presidential election and, if so, which presidential candidate they planned to vote for. In the same context, reasons for not voting were also asked. The survey started by asking respondents about their voting behaviour, for example whether they planned to vote in the presidential election and, if so, which presidential candidate they planned to vote for. In the same context, reasons for not voting were also asked. Next, respondents were asked what they thought about each of the presidential candidates and who they thought would be running against each other in the second round of the election. Respondents were also asked questions about their political and societal knowledge. In the next round of the survey, respondents were asked which candidate they voted for in the first round. They were also asked whether they intended to vote in the second round of the presidential election and, if so, for which candidate. In the same context, they were asked about the possibility of not voting. In the last round of the questionnaire, respondents were asked which candidate they voted for and what factors influenced this decision. Background variables included the respondent's age, gender, highest level of education, political party preference, electoral area, and municipality type.

According to exit polling in ten key states of the 2024 presidential election in the United States, Donald Trump received the most support from men between the ages of ** and **. In comparison, ** percent of women between the ages of ** and ** reported voting for Kamala Harris.

According to results on November 6, 2024, former President Donald Trump had received *** Electoral College votes in the race to become the next President of the United States, securing him the presidency. With all states counted, Trump received a total of *** electoral votes. Candidates need *** votes to become the next President of the United States.

Aineisto sisältää kolmella kyselykierroksella samoilta vastaajilta kerättyjä vuoden 2024 presidentinvaaleihin liittyviä näkemyksiä. Aineisto on kerätty osana Kansalaismielipidepaneelia, joka kuuluu kansalliseen yleisen mielipiteen mittaamisen infrastruktuuriin (The Finnish Research Infrastructure for Public Opinion, FIRIPO). Alussa kartoitettiin vastaajien äänestyskäyttäytymistä, eli aikooko vastaaja äänestää presidentinvaaleissa, ja jos aikoo, niin ketä presidentinvaaliehdokasta on suunnitellut äänestävänsä. Samassa kysyttiin myös syitä äänestämättä jättämiselle. Seuraavaksi vastaajilta tiedusteltiin, mitä mieltä he ovat kustakin presidentinvaaliehdokkaasta, ja keiden uskoo olevan vastakkain vaalien toisella kierroksella. Vastaajilta kysyttiin myös poliittista ja yhteiskunnallista tietämystä kartoittavia kysymyksiä. Seuraavalla kyselykierroksella vastaajilta kysyttiin, ketä ehdokasta äänesti ensimmäisellä kierroksella. Lisäksi kysyttiin, aikooko vastaaja äänestää presidentinvaalien toisella kierroksella, ja jos aikoo, niin ketä ehdokasta. Samassa yhteydessä kysyttiin mahdollisesta äänestämättä jättämisestä. Viimeisellä kyselykierroksella tiedusteltiin, ketä ehdokasta vastaaja äänesti ja, mitkä tekijät vaikuttivat tähän äänestysvalintaan. Taustamuuttujia aineistossa ovat vastaajan ikä, sukupuoli, koulutustaso, puoluekanta, vaalialue ja paikkakuntatyyppi. The data include views on Finland's 2024 presidential election, collected from the same respondents in three rounds of surveys. The data was collected as part of the Public Opinion Panel, which is part of The Finnish Research Infrastructure for Public Opinion (FIRIPO). The survey started by asking respondents about their voting behaviour, for example whether they planned to vote in the presidential election and, if so, which presidential candidate they planned to vote for. In the same context, reasons for not voting were also asked. The survey started by asking respondents about their voting behaviour, for example whether they planned to vote in the presidential election and, if so, which presidential candidate they planned to vote for. In the same context, reasons for not voting were also asked. Next, respondents were asked what they thought about each of the presidential candidates and who they thought would be running against each other in the second round of the election. Respondents were also asked questions about their political and societal knowledge. In the next round of the survey, respondents were asked which candidate they voted for in the first round. They were also asked whether they intended to vote in the second round of the presidential election and, if so, for which candidate. In the same context, they were asked about the possibility of not voting. In the last round of the questionnaire, respondents were asked which candidate they voted for and what factors influenced this decision. Background variables included the respondent's age, gender, highest level of education, political party preference, electoral area, and municipality type. Todennäköisyys- ja ei-todennäköisyysotannan yhdistelmäMixedProbabilityNonprobability Mixed probability and non-probabilityMixedProbabilityNonprobability

The 2024 European Election Study (EES) Voter Study is a post-election study conducted in all 27 European Union member states after the elections to the European Parliament were held between June 6 and 9, 2024. As in the previous EES 2019 round, data was predominantly collected via online interviews sampled from access panel databases. In each member state, a minimum of 1,000 interviews were conducted (with the exception of Cyprus, Luxembourg and Malta, where 500 interviews were envisaged). As in previous EES rounds, the questionnaire includes core traditional items included in previous EES voter studies (1989 - 2019), thus allowing for over-time as well as cross-national analysis. The study covers items on electoral behavior, such as questions on turnout and vote choice at the European and previous national elections, party preferences, propensity to vote questions, government approval, general political attitudes, interest in politics, demographics such as gender, age, education, religion etc. Innovations in the EES 2024 include questions about disinformation in the media regarding the EP election, military assistance to Ukraine, and democratic governance. The question on attitudes on the environment was replaced with a question on attitudes on climate change. To capture the debates on feminism, a well-tested question on gender roles was included. As in the case of the EES Study 2014 and 2019 Voter Studies, a number of the political attitude questions have the same wording as, and can hence be linked with, the Chapel Hill Expert Survey. An additional innovation is the offer of NUTS III-level regional information, which, after anonymization checks, will be offered at a later stage. Non-probability: QuotaNonprobability.Quota Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsauswahl: QuotenstichprobeNonprobability.Quota Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)SelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.CAWI

According to exit polling in ten key states of the 2024 presidential election in the United States, ** percent of surveyed white voters reported voting for Donald Trump. In contrast, ** percent of Black voters reported voting for Kamala Harris.

The Citizens' Pulse surveys examine Finnish attitudes and opinions on current issues. Main themes in the surveys include the activity and communication of authorities, compliance with regulations, future expectations, trust, and the respondents' own state of mind. This collection round also included questions on the Russian invasion of Ukraine and issues that the Finnish government should address. The first collection round of 2024 surveyed the respondents' satisfaction with the state of democracy in Finland, as well as their trust in other people and various institutions (e.g. the Finnish Government, the health care system, the media, and the Finnish Defence Forces). The respondents were asked to evaluate how fair or unfair they thought Finnish society was at present, and their state of mind was examined with questions on various matters relating to health, well-being, and their situation in life. The questions covered, for example, the respondents' own mental well-being, whether they were worried about the adequacy of their income, their confidence in their future, and experiences of stress. Additionally, the respondents were asked to evaluate whether an atmosphere of crisis prevailed amongst Finns and whether Finland's NATO membership had impacted their sense of safety. The respondents' views were investigated on which societal issues (e.g. promotion of climate action, national defence, poverty reduction, effective healthcare, operating conditions of businesses and investment opportunities) the Finnish government should focus on in the near future. Opinions on whether Finland's national debt should be reduced regardless of the resulting cuts in benefits and welfare it would entail for Finnish citizens and whether social security cuts can be considered acceptable if they provide an incentive to take up work and increase employment were also surveyed. The respondents' views on the right to seek asylum in Finland were also charted. The next set of questions focused on the Russian invasion of Ukraine and national security in Finland. The respondents were asked how concerned they were about the crisis in Ukraine and its effects, and whether they were concerned that the war might expand beyond Ukraine. The respondents were also asked whether they were concerned that Russia might take military action against Finland or try to interfere with the functioning of Finnish society. Opinions on the economic sanctions imposed on Russia by the EU and whether Finland should be ready to receive significant numbers of refugees from Ukraine if necessary were charted. The respondents were asked whether Finland's actions on the border with Russia had reinforced their sense security, whether Finland's response to Russian interference has been adequate and timely, and whether the respondents were concerned about Russia's recent actions. Additionally, the respondents were asked whether the uncertainty caused by the crisis in Ukraine had impacted the respondents' consumer behaviour and whether the recent rise in interest rates had created financial difficulties for the respondents' households. The respondents were also asked whether they had noticed any cyber security issues or instances where purposefully misleading claims based on misinformation were spread on social media or online over the previous month. Voting intentions in the 2023 presidental election in Finland were surveyed by asking the respondents whether they intended to vote in the election, whether they intended to vote during the early voting period or on election day, and whether they felt that by voting they could have an impact on matters that were important to them and the people close to them. Background variables included the language responded in, the respondent's gender, age group, NUTS3 region of residence, highest level of education, household composition, and perceived financial situation of household.

In the United States in 2023, ** percent of Republicans reported that they owned at least one gun, and ** percent said that they lived in a household with a gun. In comparison, only ** percent of Democrats owned at least one gun, and ** percent lived in a gun household. Who are gun owners? In 2022, significantly more Democrats were in favor of limiting gun ownership in comparison to Republicans. On the other hand, more Republicans were in favor of protecting the right to own guns in comparison to Democrats. When examined by education level, respondents who said they only had some college, but no degree were the most likely to have said that there is at least one gun in their household. However, nearly a ******* of Americans over 18 years old said that they rarely carry a gun on their person. Republicans vs Democrats Debate The gun control debate in the United States has been a highly contested one. In light of frequent mass shootings, gun control laws have become the center of policy discussions. Democratic politicians tend to put significant emphasis on their gun control policies and are overall more in favor of stricter gun control laws and want more background checks for those who want to purchase a gun. However, Republicans tend to work in favor of gun rights.