This dataset contains model-based county-level estimates in GIS-friendly format. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. Project was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 or 2021 data, Census Bureau 2022 county population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2018–2022 estimates. The 2024 release uses 2022 BRFSS data for 36 measures and 2021 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening, and taking medicine for high blood pressure control among those with high blood pressure) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the census 2022 county boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 40 measures at the county level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software. https://cdcarcgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3b7221d4e47740cab9235b839fa55cd7

Statistics illustrates consumption, production, prices, and trade of Maps and hydrographic or similar charts; (printed other than in book form), including wall maps, topographical plans and similar in the United States from 2007 to 2024.

This dataset contains model-based census tract level estimates in GIS-friendly format. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 or 2021 data, Census Bureau 2010 population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2015–2019 estimates. The 2024 release uses 2022 BRFSS data for 36 measures and 2021 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening, and taking medicine for high blood pressure control among those with high blood pressure) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the Census tract 2022 boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 40 measures at the census tract level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software. https://cdcarcgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3b7221d4e47740cab9235b839fa55cd7

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Niobrara National Scenic River and Vicinity, Nebraska is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) an ESRI file geodatabase (niob_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (niob_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (niob_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (niob_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (niob_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the niob_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (niob_geology_metadata.txt or niob_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:100,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 50.8 meters or 166.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS Pro, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

This dataset contains model-based place (incorporated and census designated places) estimates in GIS-friendly format. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia —at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 or 2021 data, Census Bureau 2020 population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2018–2022 estimates. The 2024 release uses 2022 BRFSS data for 36 measures and 2021 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening, and taking medicine for high blood pressure control among those with high blood pressure) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the 2020 Census place boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 40 measures at the place level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software. https://cdcarcgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3b7221d4e47740cab9235b839fa55cd7

Web Map for the Northern Region (R1) Fire History Viewer Web Mapping Application. For any questions about this Web Map or Layers. Contact the USFSRegion01 AGOL Administrator.

This web application shows predetermined field sampling sites in a systematically-spaced sampling grid for all flowing waters in the western US. Use this map to plan your field work and determine the best streams to take field samples for specific species of interest.Please visit the website for more information, supporting science, species list, and sampling protocols.https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/rmrs/projects/ednatlasPlease be aware that workflows have been modified and samples that have been taken are only included in the geodatabase if the contributor has given explicit permission to include them. (Which means that a few points in previous versions listed as 'sampled', will now be listed as 'not sampled'.)

Information on water depth in river channels is important for a number of applications in water resource management but can be difficult to obtain via conventional field methods, particularly over large spatial extents and with the kind of frequency and regularity required to support monitoring programs. Remote sensing methods could provide a viable alternative means of mapping river bathymetry (i.e., water depth). The purpose of this study was to develop and test new, spectrally based techniques for estimating water depth from satellite image data. More specifically, a neural network-based temporal ensembling approach was evaluated in comparison to several other neural network depth retrieval (NNDR) algorithms. These methods are described in a manuscript titled "Neural Network-Based Temporal Ensembling of Water Depth Estimates Derived from SuperDove Images" and the purpose of this data release is to make available the depth maps produced using these techniques. The images used as ...

Snapshot img

Digital Map Market Size 2025-2029

The digital map market size is forecast to increase by USD 31.95 billion at a CAGR of 31.3% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is driven by the increasing adoption of intelligent Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) and the availability of location-based services. PDAs, such as smartphones and smartwatches, are becoming increasingly integrated with digital map technologies, enabling users to navigate and access real-time information on-the-go. The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) enables remote monitoring of cars and theft recovery. Location-based services, including mapping and navigation apps, are a crucial component of this trend, offering users personalized and convenient solutions for travel and exploration. However, the market also faces significant challenges.
Ensuring the protection of sensitive user information is essential for companies operating in this market, as trust and data security are key factors in driving user adoption and retention. Additionally, the competition in the market is intense, with numerous players vying for market share. Companies must differentiate themselves through innovative features, user experience, and strong branding to stand out in this competitive landscape. Security and privacy concerns continue to be a major obstacle, as the collection and use of location data raises valid concerns among consumers.

What will be the Size of the Digital Map Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

In the market, cartographic generalization and thematic mapping techniques are utilized to convey complex spatial information, transforming raw data into insightful visualizations. Choropleth maps and dot density maps illustrate distribution patterns of environmental data, economic data, and demographic data, while spatial interpolation and predictive modeling enable the estimation of hydrographic data and terrain data in areas with limited information. Urban planning and land use planning benefit from these tools, facilitating network modeling and location intelligence for public safety and emergency management.

Spatial regression and spatial autocorrelation analyses provide valuable insights into urban development trends and patterns. Network analysis and shortest path algorithms optimize transportation planning and logistics management, enhancing marketing analytics and sales territory optimization. Decision support systems and fleet management incorporate 3D building models and real-time data from street view imagery, enabling effective resource management and disaster response. The market in the US is experiencing robust growth, driven by the integration of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Global Positioning Systems (GPS), and advanced computer technology into various industries.

How is this Digital Map Industry segmented?

The digital map industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Application

  Navigation
  Geocoders
  Others


Type

  Outdoor
  Indoor


Solution

  Software
  Services


Deployment

  On-premises
  Cloud


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    UK


  APAC

    China
    India
    Indonesia
    Japan
    South Korea


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Application Insights

The navigation segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. Digital maps play a pivotal role in various industries, particularly in automotive applications for driver assistance systems. These maps encompass raster data, aerial photography, government data, and commercial data, among others. Open-source data and proprietary data are integrated to ensure map accuracy and up-to-date information. Map production involves the use of GPS technology, map projections, and GIS software, while map maintenance and quality control ensure map accuracy. Location-based services (LBS) and route optimization are integral parts of digital maps, enabling real-time navigation and traffic data.

Data validation and map tiles ensure data security. Cloud computing facilitates map distribution and map customization, allowing users to access maps on various devices, including mobile mapping and indoor mapping. Map design, map printing, and reverse geocoding further enhance the user experience. Spatial analysis and data modeling are essential for data warehousing and real-time navigation. The automotive industry's increasing adoption of connected cars and long-term evolution (LTE) technologies have fueled the demand for digital maps. These maps enable driver assistance app

Date of Images:6/24/2024, 6/25/2024Date of Next Image:UnknownSummary:Scientists at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center created these water extents in June 2024 using PlanetScope imagery. These images can be used to see where open water is visible at the time of the satellite overpass. This product shows all water detected and differentiates between normal water areas and some flooded areas. This product was classified using the Cropland Data Layer (CDL).It's important to note that all flooded areas may not be captured do to the sensors limitations of not being able to "see" through vegetation and buildings. To determine where additional flooding may have occurred, combine this layer with other data sets.Suggested Use:This product shows water that is detected by the sensor with different colors indicating different land cover/land use classifications from CDL that appear to have water and are potentially flooded.Blue (1): Known WaterRed (2): Flooded DevelopedGreen (3): Flooded VegetationOrange (4): Flooded Cropland/GrasslandGray (5): Clouds/Cloud Shadow(0): No DataSatellite/Sensor:PlanetScopeResolution:3 metersCredits:NASA Disasters Program, Includes copyrighted material of Planet Labs PBC. All rights reserved.Esri REST Endpoint:See URL section on the right side of page.WMS Endpoint:https://maps.disasters.nasa.gov/ags04/services/iowa_flood_202406/Iowa_Floods_Surface_Water_Extent_Planet/MapServer/WMSServer

This USGS data release documents coarse ranges for 257 fish species in the conterminous United States for level 8 hydrologic units from the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). These range maps were derived by combining known fish occurrence information from four data sources: point occurrences from the Aquatic Gap Analysis Project (AGAP) fish database, stream segment (i.e., NHDPlusV2.1 COMID) occurrences from the IchthyMaps dataset, point occurrences from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), and HUC-8 level range maps developed by NatureServe. Data can be linked to geospatial units of the WBD using the HUC8 field. Data are provided in comma separated value (CSV) and zipped Parquet file formats. Parquet file format is provided to help facilitate faster download and read capabilities when using compatible packages in coding languages such as R and Python. Source data from GBIF are also included in range_source_data_gbif.csv and are further documented at https://doi.org/10.15468/dd.qctv4s.

The National Park Service (NPS) requests burn severity assessments through an agreement with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to be completed by analysts with the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) Program. The MTBS Program assesses the frequency, extent, and magnitude (size and severity) of all large wildland fires (wildfires and prescribed fires) in the conterminous United States (CONUS), Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico for the period 1984 and beyond. All fires reported as greater than 1,000 acres in the western U.S. and greater than 500 acres in the eastern U.S. are mapped across all ownerships. MTBS produces a series of geospatial and tabular data for analysis at a range of spatial, temporal, and thematic scales and are intended to meet a variety of information needs that require consistent data about fire effects through space and time. This map layer is a vector polygon shapefile for all NPS-requested burn severity fires, occurring during calendar year 1984 and 2 ...

As part of the periodic update of the geothermal energy assessments for the USA (e.g., last update by Williams and others, 2008), a new three-dimensional temperature map has been constructed for the Great Basin, USA. Williams and DeAngelo (2011) identified uncertainty in estimates of conductive heat flow near land surface as the largest contributor to uncertainty in previously published temperature maps. The new temperature maps incorporate new conductive heat flow estimates developed by DeAngelo and others (2023). Predicted temperatures at depth are compared with representative measurements (for conductively dominated conditions), showing good agreement under relatively simple uniform conditions. Inputs included radiogenic heat production for all layers of 1.89 μW/m3, effective bulk thermal conductivity of 2.7 W/m/°C for all rocks underlying sedimentary basins, and a previously published (Williams and DeAngelo, 2011) empirically driven estimate of increasing thermal conductivity with depth in sedimentary sequences. The resulting three-dimensional temperature model is presented in this data release. Version 1.1 corrects a minor coding error for generation of the thermal profiles. For version 1.0, the code had the following error: thermal conductivity at the reference temperature (zero) was allowed to vary in equation (3) of the documentation, but thermal conductivity was held constant value of 2.7 in the computation of the coefficient “b” (see paragraph following equation (3)). The new 3D temperature model was re-verified using the procedure described in the manuscript (i.e., Fig 7 was reconstructed and checked to ensure no bias or regionalization). Files that were updated for version 1.1 end with '_v1_1.'

This dataset contains model-based ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level estimates in GIS-friendly format. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2022 or 2021 data, Census Bureau 2020 population counts, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2018–2022 estimates. The 2024 release uses 2022 BRFSS data for 36 measures and 2021 BRFSS data for 4 measures (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, cholesterol screening, and taking medicine for high blood pressure control among those with high blood pressure) that the survey collects data on every other year. These data can be joined with the Census 2021 ZCTA boundary file in a GIS system to produce maps for 40 measures at the ZCTA level. An ArcGIS Online feature service is also available for users to make maps online or to add data to desktop GIS software. https://cdcarcgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3b7221d4e47740cab9235b839fa55cd7

Summary

Geojson files used to visualize geospatial layers relevant to identifying and assessing trucking fleet decarbonization opportunities with the MIT Climate & Sustainability Consortium's Geospatial Trucking Industry Decarbonization Explorer (Geo-TIDE) tool.

Relevant Links

Link to the online version of the tool (requires creation of a free user account).

Link to GitHub repo with source code to produce this dataset and deploy the Geo-TIDE tool locally.

Funding

This dataset was produced with support from the MIT Climate & Sustainability Consortium.

Original Data Sources

These geojson files draw from and synthesize a number of different datasets and tools. The original data sources and tools are described below:

Filename(s) Description of Original Data Source(s) Link(s) to Download Original Data License and Attribution for Original Data Source(s)

faf5_freight_flows/*.geojson

trucking_energy_demand.geojson

highway_assignment_links_*.geojson

infrastructure_pooling_thought_experiment/*.geojson

Regional and highway-level freight flow data obtained from the Freight Analysis Framework Version 5. Shapefiles for FAF5 region boundaries and highway links are obtained from the National Transportation Atlas Database. Emissions attributes are evaluated by incorporating data from the 2002 Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey and the GREET lifecycle emissions tool maintained by Argonne National Lab.

Shapefile for FAF5 Regions

Shapefile for FAF5 Highway Network Links

FAF5 2022 Origin-Destination Freight Flow database

FAF5 2022 Highway Assignment Results

Attribution for Shapefiles: United States Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). Available at: https://geodata.bts.gov/search?collection=Dataset.

License for Shapefiles: This NTAD dataset is a work of the United States government as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101 and as such are not protected by any U.S. copyrights. This work is available for unrestricted public use.

Attribution for Origin-Destination Freight Flow database: National Transportation Research Center in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory with funding from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics and the Federal Highway Administration. Freight Analysis Framework Version 5: Origin-Destination Data. Available from: https://faf.ornl.gov/faf5/Default.aspx. Obtained on Aug 5, 2024. In the public domain.

Attribution for the 2022 Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey Data: United States Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey (VIUS) 2002 [supporting datasets]. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21949/1506070

Attribution for the GREET tool (original publication): Argonne National Laboratory Energy Systems Division Center for Transportation Research. GREET Life-cycle Model. 2014. Available from this link.

Attribution for the GREET tool (2022 updates): Wang, Michael, et al. Summary of Expansions and Updates in GREET® 2022. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1891644

grid_emission_intensity/*.geojson

Emission intensity data is obtained from the eGRID database maintained by the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

eGRID subregion boundaries are obtained as a shapefile from the eGRID Mapping Files database.

eGRID database

Shapefile with eGRID subregion boundaries

Attribution for eGRID data: United States Environmental Protection Agency: eGRID with 2022 data. Available from https://www.epa.gov/egrid/download-data. In the public domain.

Attribution for shapefile: United States Environmental Protection Agency: eGRID Mapping Files. Available from https://www.epa.gov/egrid/egrid-mapping-files. In the public domain.

US_elec.geojson

US_hy.geojson

US_lng.geojson

US_cng.geojson

US_lpg.geojson

Locations of direct current fast chargers and refueling stations for alternative fuels along U.S. highways. Obtained directly from the Station Data for Alternative Fuel Corridors in the Alternative Fuels Data Center maintained by the United States Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

US_elec.geojson

US_hy.geojson

US_lng.geojson

US_cng.geojson

US_lpg.geojson

Attribution: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Alternative Fueling Station Corridors. 2024. Available from: https://afdc.energy.gov/corridors. In the public domain.

These data and software code ("Data") are provided by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ("NREL"), which is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC ("Alliance"), for the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE"), and may be used for any purpose whatsoever.

daily_grid_emission_profiles/*.geojson

Hourly emission intensity data obtained from ElectricityMaps.

Original data can be downloaded as csv files from the ElectricityMaps United States of America database

Shapefile with region boundaries used by ElectricityMaps

License: Open Database License (ODbL). Details here: https://www.electricitymaps.com/data-portal

Attribution for csv files: Electricity Maps (2024). United States of America 2022-23 Hourly Carbon Intensity Data (Version January 17, 2024). Electricity Maps Data Portal. https://www.electricitymaps.com/data-portal.

Attribution for shapefile with region boundaries: ElectricityMaps contributors (2024). electricitymaps-contrib (Version v1.155.0) [Computer software]. https://github.com/electricitymaps/electricitymaps-contrib.

gen_cap_2022_state_merged.geojson

trucking_energy_demand.geojson

Grid electricity generation and net summer power capacity data is obtained from the state-level electricity database maintained by the United States Energy Information Administration.

U.S. state boundaries obtained from this United States Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ScienceBase-Catalog.

Annual electricity generation by state

Net summer capacity by state

Shapefile with U.S. state boundaries

Attribution for electricity generation and capacity data: U.S. Energy Information Administration (Aug 2024). Available from: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/state/. In the public domain.

electricity_rates_by_state_merged.geojson

Commercial electricity prices are obtained from the Electricity database maintained by the United States Energy Information Administration.

Electricity rate by state

Attribution: U.S. Energy Information Administration (Aug 2024). Available from: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.php. In the public domain.

demand_charges_merged.geojson

demand_charges_by_state.geojson

Maximum historical demand charges for each state and zip code are derived from a dataset compiled by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in this this Data Catalog.

Historical demand charge dataset

The original dataset is compiled by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC ('Alliance').

Attribution: McLaren, Joyce, Pieter Gagnon, Daniel Zimny-Schmitt, Michael DeMinco, and Eric Wilson. 2017. 'Maximum demand charge rates for commercial and industrial electricity tariffs in the United States.' NREL Data Catalog. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Last updated: July 24, 2024. DOI: 10.7799/1392982.

eastcoast.geojson

midwest.geojson

la_i710.geojson

h2la.geojson

bayarea.geojson

saltlake.geojson

northeast.geojson

Highway corridors and regions targeted for heavy duty vehicle infrastructure projects are derived from a public announcement on February 15, 2023 by the United States Department of Energy.

The shapefile with Bay area boundaries is obtained from this Berkeley Library dataset.

The shapefile with Utah county boundaries is obtained from this dataset from the Utah Geospatial Resource Center.

Shapefile for Bay Area country boundaries

Shapefile for counties in Utah

Attribution for public announcement: United States Department of Energy. Biden-Harris Administration Announces Funding for Zero-Emission Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Corridors, Expansion of EV Charging in Underserved Communities (2023). Available from https://www.energy.gov/articles/biden-harris-administration-announces-funding-zero-emission-medium-and-heavy-duty-vehicle.

Attribution for Bay area boundaries: San Francisco (Calif.). Department Of Telecommunications and Information Services. Bay Area Counties. 2006. In the public domain.

Attribution for Utah boundaries: Utah Geospatial Resource Center & Lieutenant Governor's Office. Utah County Boundaries (2023). Available from https://gis.utah.gov/products/sgid/boundaries/county/.

License for Utah boundaries: Creative Commons 4.0 International License.

incentives_and_regulations/*.geojson

State-level incentives and regulations targeting heavy duty vehicles are collected from the State Laws and Incentives database maintained by the United States Department of Energy's Alternative Fuels Data Center.

Data was collected manually from the State Laws and Incentives database.

Attribution: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Alternative Fuels Data Center. State Laws and Incentives. Accessed on Aug 5, 2024 from: https://afdc.energy.gov/laws/state. In the public domain.

These data and software code ("Data") are provided by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ("NREL"), which is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC ("Alliance"), for the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE"), and may be used for any purpose whatsoever.

costs_and_emissions/*.geojson

diesel_price_by_state.geojson

trucking_energy_demand.geojson

Lifecycle costs and emissions of electric and diesel trucking are evaluated by adapting the model developed by Moreno Sader et al., and calibrated to the Run on Less dataset for the Tesla Semi collected from the 2023 PepsiCo Semi pilot by the North American Council for Freight Efficiency.

In

Statistics illustrates market overview of maps and hydrographic or similar charts; printed in book form, including atlases, topographical plans and similar articles in the United States from 2007 to 2024.

debisoft/gimp-predator-map-dataset dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community

Dates of Images:Post-Event: 1/10/2024Pre-Event: 1/2/2024Date of Next Image:UnknownSummary:Natural Color: The Natural Color RGB provides a false composite look at the surface. This RGB uses a shortwave, the near-infrared, and red channels from the instrument.Color Infrared: The Color Infrared composite is created using the near-infrared, red, and green channels, allowing for the ability to see areas impacted from the fires. The near-infrared gives the ability to see through thin clouds. Healthy vegetation is shown as red, water is in blue.True Color: The True Color RGB composite provides a product of how the surface would look to the naked eye from space. The RGB is created using the red, green, and blue channels of the respective instrument.Suggested Use:Natural Color: areas of water will appear blue, healthy green vegetation will appear as a bright green, urban areas in various shades of magenta.Color Infrared: depicts healthy vegetation as red, water as blue. Some minor atmospheric corrections have occurred.True Color: provides a product of how the surface would look to the naked eye from space. The True Color RGB is produced using the 3 visible wavelength bands (red, green, and blue) from the respective sensor. Some minor atmospheric corrections have occurred.Satellite/Sensor:Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI)Resolution:30 metersCredits:NASA/MSFC, USGSEsri REST Endpoint:See URL section on right side of pageWMS Endpoint:Data Download:https://maps.disasters.nasa.gov/download/gis_products/event_specific/2024/se_us_severestorms_202401/landsat/

Date of Images:Post-Event: 2/5/2024, 2/6/2024Pre-Event: 1/24/2024, 1/25/2024Date of Next Image: UnknownSummary:The Advanced Rapid Imaging and Analysis (ARIA) and Observational Products for End-Users from Remote Sensing Analysis (OPERA) teams at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and California Institute of Technology derived the surface water extent maps using the OPERA Dynamic Surface Water Extent (DSWx) products and prototypes. The OPERA prototype DSWx from Sentinel-1 (S1) was used to create two water surface extent maps for February 5, 2024 (6 PM PST) and February 6, 2024 (6 AM PST). These maps depict areas that were inundated due to high rainfall due to back-to-back Atmospheric Rivers in California, USA. The inundation maps were created by stitching relevant tiles from the layers within the DSWx-S1 prototype.The water change map is derived from OPERA prototype DSWx from Sentinel-1 (S1) for two pairs of dates: between January 25, 2024 (6 AM PST) and February 06, 2024 (6 AM PST) and between January 24, 2024 (6 PM PST) and February 05, 2024 (6 PM PST). These maps depict areas of new water coverage that may have resulted from high rainfall due to back-to-back Atmospheric Rivers (ARs) in California, USA. The water change maps were created by taking the difference between the water extent before and after the ARs.The results posted here are preliminary and unvalidated results, primarily intended to aid the field response and people who wanted to have a rough first look at the inundation extent. The ARIA-share website has always focused on posting preliminary results as fast as possible for disaster response.The post-processed products are available to download at https://aria-share.jpl.nasa.gov/202402-California_storm/DSWx-S1. The OPERA prototype DSWx-S1 is still under development and is not yet in production. Production of DSWx-S1 is expected to begin in Summer 2024. For more information about the OPERA project and other products visit https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/go/opera.For more information about the Dynamic Surface Water eXtent product suite, please refer to the DSWx Product page: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/go/opera/products/dswx-product-suiteSuggested Use:The OPERA proto-type DSWx-S1 Water products classifies the OPERA RTC-S1 input imagery into ‘not water’, ‘water’, and ‘inundated vegetation’ with the masks such as layover/shadow mask and HAND mask. Areas classified as "open water" are blue. Areas classified as "inundated vegetation" are green.Light gray areas are flagged in the HAND mask. The Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) mask delineates regions where the terrain's elevation exceeds a specified threshold relative to the height above nearest drainage point, indicating areas less likely to be the subject of direct inundation.Dark Gray areas are flagged in the layover/shadow mask. The layover/shad mask identifies zones that are either occluded by topographic features taller than the surrounding landscape (layover) or are not illuminated by the radar signal due to obstruction by these elevated features (shadow), leading to potential voids in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery. Areas with no water detected are transparent.This layer is meant to provide users with a quick view for water/no-water. Invalid data classes ( layover/shadow mask and HAND mask) are also provided to indicate areas in which the binary classification does not provide water/no-water classification.Satellite/Sensor:Copernicus Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)Resolution:30 metersCredits:NASA JPL-Caltech ARIA and OPERA Teams, NASA, NASA Disasters ProgramSentinel-1 data were accessed through the Copernicus Open Hub and the Alaska Satellite Facility server. The product contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2024), processed by the European Space Agency and analyzed by the NASA-JPL/Caltech ARIA and OPERA team. This product was derived from preliminary OPERA processing. Product POCs: Jungkyo Jung (Jungkyo.Jung@jpl.nasa.gov)Alexander Handwerger (alexander.handwerger@jpl.nasa.gov)Steven Chan (steventsz.k.chan@jpl.nasa.gov)Esri REST Endpoint:See URL section on right side of pageWMS Endpoint:https://maps.disasters.nasa.gov/ags04/services/california_atmospheric_river_202402/aria_opera_dswx_watermaps/MapServer/WMSServerData Download:https://aria-share.jpl.nasa.gov/202402-California_storm/DSWx-S1/

This is a tiled collection of the 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) and is one meter resolution. The 3DEP data holdings serve as the elevation layer of The National Map, and provide foundational elevation information for earth science studies and mapping applications in the United States. Scientists and resource managers use 3DEP data for hydrologic modeling, resource monitoring, mapping and visualization, and many other applications. The elevations in this DEM represent the topographic bare-earth surface. USGS standard one-meter DEMs are produced exclusively from high resolution light detection and ranging (lidar) source data of one-meter or higher resolution. One-meter DEM surfaces are seamless within collection projects, but, not necessarily seamless across projects. The spatial reference used for tiles of the one-meter DEM within the conterminous United States (CONUS) is Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) in units of meters, and in conformance with the North American Datum of 1983 ...