100+ datasets found
  1. Third-party performances in U.S. presidential elections 1892-2020

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Third-party performances in U.S. presidential elections 1892-2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1134513/third-party-performance-us-elections/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 4, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The 1860 election cemented the Republican Party's position as one of the two major parties in U.S. politics, along with the already-established Democratic Party. Since this time, all U.S. presidents have been affiliated with these two parties, and their candidates have generally performed the best in each presidential election. In spite of this two-party dominance, there have always been third-party or independent candidates running on the ballot, either on a nationwide, regional or state level. No third-party candidate has ever won a U.S. election, although there have been several occasions where they have carried states or split the vote with major party candidates. Today, the largest third-party in U.S. politics is the Libertarian Party, who are considered to be socially liberal, but economically conservative; in the 2016 election, their nominee, Gary Johnson, secured just over three percent of the popular vote, while their latest candidate, Jo Jorgenson, received just over one percent of the vote in the 2020 election.

    Theodore Roosevelt The most successful third-party nominee was Theodore Roosevelt in the 1912 election, who was the only third-party candidate to come second in a U.S. election. The former president had become disillusioned with his successor's growing conservatism, and challenged the incumbent President Taft for the Republican nomination in 1912. Roosevelt proved to be the most popular candidate in the primaries, however Taft had already secured enough Republican delegates in the south to seal the nomination. Roosevelt then used this split in the Republican Party to form his own, Progressive Party, and challenged both major party candidates for the presidency (even taking a bullet in the process). In the end, Roosevelt carried six states, and won over 27 percent of the popular vote, while Taft carried just two states with 23 percent of the vote; this split in the Republican Party allowed the Democratic nominee, Woodrow Wilson, to win 82 percent of the electoral votes despite only winning 42 percent of the popular vote.

    Other notable performances The last third-party candidate to win electoral votes was George Wallace* in the 1968 election. The Democratic Party had been the most popular party in the south since before the Civil War, however their increasingly progressive policies in the civil rights era alienated many of their southern voters. Wallace ran on a white supremacist and pro-segregationist platform and won the popular vote in five states. This was a similar story to that of Storm Thurmond, twenty years earlier.

    In the 1992 election, Independent candidate Ross Perot received almost one fifth of the popular vote. Although he did not win any electoral votes, Perot split the vote so much that he prevented either Clinton or Bush Sr. from winning a majority in any state except Arkansas (Clinton's home state). Perot ran again in 1996, but with less than half the share of votes he received four years previously; subsequent studies and polls have shown that Perot took an equal number of votes from both of the major party candidates in each election.

  2. F

    Food Second Party Audit Service Report

    • archivemarketresearch.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Feb 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Archive Market Research (2025). Food Second Party Audit Service Report [Dataset]. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/food-second-party-audit-service-35645
    Explore at:
    pdf, ppt, docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Archive Market Research
    License

    https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global Food Second Party Audit Service market size was valued at USD xx million in 2025 and is projected to reach USD xx million by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of xx% during the forecast period (2025-2033). The market growth is attributed to the rising demand for food safety and quality, increasing consumer awareness, and stringent government regulations. Moreover, the growing adoption of blockchain technology and the Internet of Things (IoT) in the food industry are further推动 the market growth. The Food Second Party Audit Service market is segmented by application (fresh food, dairy, frozen food, puffed food, delicatessen, and others), by type (process audit, product audit, and system audit), and by region (North America, South America, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia Pacific). The fresh food segment held the largest market share in 2025, owing to the increasing demand for fresh and healthy food products. The process audit segment is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period, as it helps organizations to identify and mitigate risks associated with food safety and quality. Geographically, the North America region accounted for the largest market share in 2025 and is projected to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period. The presence of leading food companies and stringent food safety regulations in the region are the key factors driving the market growth.

  3. H

    Replication data for: Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House....

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Jan 21, 2009
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Harvard Dataverse (2009). Replication data for: Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Second Edition. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LCOZIW
    Explore at:
    zip(34891), zip(155023), tsv(39561), zip(12045), doc(21504), zip(97762), html(11849), tsv(147907), doc(31232), doc(63488), tsv(43498), tsv(37671), tsv(30106), zip(38035), zip(33112), application/x-spss-sav(320863), tsv(2427488), tsv(22918), zip(28240), doc(29184), zip(1825), zip(552549), zip(164472), text/plain; charset=us-ascii(417060), tsv(26243), tsv(857594), doc(26112), zip(2134660), tsv(3034753), html(5610), text/plain; charset=us-ascii(3903), zip(30213), tsv(63683), zip(2515), zip(718000), zip(61963), zip(1296327), xls(107008), html(6865), zip(2938401), html(5287), doc(35840), zip(55210), tsv(1089305), zip(2174995), zip(40597), xls(146944), doc(27136), text/plain; charset=us-ascii(133472), zip(63720), tsv(3032716), zip(19056), tsv(51920), tsv(55196), zip(849663), doc(28672), zip(3011), doc(34304), html(984766), zip(63927), text/plain; charset=us-ascii(1288), tsv(26812), doc(29696), zip(58388), doc(30720), zip(1128), tsv(5423), tsv(25787), zip(26292), zip(173689), tsv(33941), doc(30208), zip(2809511), zip(83318), pdf(86470), doc(22528), zip(242656), tsv(25866), zip(173355), tsv(57990), text/plain; charset=us-ascii(11919)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 21, 2009
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Scholars who compare political parties invariably conclude that American parties are much weaker than their European counterparts: they are much less cohesive on legislative votes; their influence over the flow of legislation is less complete; they control but a small fraction of campaign money; they exercise almost no control over nominations; the list could go on. Within the American context, observers have commonly concluded that parties influence legislators less than pressure groups, political action committees, or constituents. Much of the literature of the 1970s and 1980s, moreover, was devoted to the thesis that American parties were declining--both in the electoral and the legislative arenas. If parties are so weak, then what are the organizing principles of American politics? The literature provides a ready stock of answers: In the electoral arena, it is the individual ca ndidates who have the most powerful organizations, who collect the most money, and who define the course of electoral campaigns. In the legislative arena, it is above all the standing committees of Congress--and, in the 1970s and 1980s, their subcommittees--that are the centers of power. The standard wisdom on the postwar Congress was that it had been an exercise first in "committee government," then in "subcommittee government." Party government usually received mention only as something conspicuously absent. This study reevaluates the role of parties and committees, and the interactions between them, in the post-World War II House of Representatives. Our view is that parties in the House--especially majority parties--are a species of "legislative cartel." These cartels seize the power, theoretically resident in the House, to make rules governing the structure and process of legislation. Possession of this rule-making power leads to two main consequences. First, the legislative process in general--and the committee system in particular--is stacked in favor of majority party interests. Second, because members of the majority party have all the structural advantages, the key players in most legislative deals are members of the majority party and the majority party's central agreements are facilitated by cartel rules and policed by the cartel's leadership.

  4. Valid second votes (representative federal election statistics): Federal...

    • data.europa.eu
    unknown
    Updated Nov 23, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2024). Valid second votes (representative federal election statistics): Federal states, cut-off date, parties, gender, age groups [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/https-www-genesis-destatis-de-genesis-old-downloads-00-tables-14121-0006_00?locale=en
    Explore at:
    unknownAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 23, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistisches Bundesamthttps://www.destatis.de/
    License

    Data licence Germany – Attribution – Version 2.0https://www.govdata.de/dl-de/by-2-0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Valid second votes (representative federal election statistics): Federal states, cut-off date, parties, gender, age groups

  5. Data types used by marketers for transactions with media sellers in the U.S....

    • statista.com
    Updated May 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista Research Department (2025). Data types used by marketers for transactions with media sellers in the U.S. 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/study/87538/third-party-cookie-deprecation/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Statista Research Department
    Description

    During a 2023 survey, 43 percent of responding U.S. marketers and agencies said they used proprietary identifiers, such as first-party data, for transactions with media sellers. Third-party cookies ranked second, named by 25 percent of respondents.

  6. f

    Multivariate logistic regression models predicting 2nd party guesses...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Joseph H. Manson; Matthew M. Gervais; Michelle A. Kline (2023). Multivariate logistic regression models predicting 2nd party guesses (recipient guessing actor's PD decision toward recipient). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082531.t006
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Joseph H. Manson; Matthew M. Gervais; Michelle A. Kline
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    1 = cooperate, 0 = defect. §P

  7. H

    Replication Data for: One More Time? Parties’ Repeated Electoral Entry in...

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Jan 11, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Raimondas Ibenskas; Marc van de Wardt (2023). Replication Data for: One More Time? Parties’ Repeated Electoral Entry in Younger Democracies [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HXQOCI
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jan 11, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Raimondas Ibenskas; Marc van de Wardt
    License

    https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/HXQOCIhttps://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/HXQOCI

    Dataset funded by
    Research Foundation Flanders ‘FWO’
    Norwegian Research Council
    Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS)
    Description

    Why and how parties continue contesting elections (“repeated entry”) is an under re-searched question despite its essence for party survival and party system stability. We study repeated entry in three decades of elections in 10 Central and Eastern European countries using a new dataset that records almost 1,000 entry decisions. Our findings underline the importance of separating between first and second league parties based on whether in the previous election a party could obtain representation alone. First league parties (those that could gain representation alone) almost always contest the next election. Second league parties (those that could not win representation alone) exit electoral competition quite frequently and adopt more diverse repeated entry strategies. We find that second league parties’ repeated entry depends on their closeness to the representation threshold, access to resources, and the number of competitors in their niche, but not on institutional constraints or voter dissatisfaction.

  8. Seair Exim Solutions

    • seair.co.in
    Updated Feb 17, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Seair Exim (2024). Seair Exim Solutions [Dataset]. https://www.seair.co.in
    Explore at:
    .bin, .xml, .csv, .xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 17, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Seair Exim Solutions
    Authors
    Seair Exim
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.

  9. e

    Party survey and follow up survey 2017-2019 - Dataset - B2FIND

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Oct 7, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2016). Party survey and follow up survey 2017-2019 - Dataset - B2FIND [Dataset]. https://b2find.eudat.eu/dataset/d0e78644-2600-539c-b1db-245500dd0063
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2016
    Description

    Two public opinion surveys were conducted. For the first, main survey, data was collected by YouGov from 1,517 participants between 17th and 21st November 2017. Participants were identified through YouGov's pre-existing panel of survey participants and were selected to produce a nationally representative sample for the UK population. This process involved panel members being sent a link to complete the survey. Only participants who answered all questions were included in the survey data. Participants who completed the questions in a time shorter than it would take to read the questions were excluded, resulting in a valid sample of 1,497 people (out of an initial sample of 1,517). The first survey comes in 4 parts: 1- Attitudes to parties, 2- Views and desires for party representation, 3- Views and desires for party participation, 4- Views and desires for party governance. A range of explanatory variables are also included for statistical analysis. A second, shorter survey was fielded via YouGov on 8th-9th of April 2019, and gained 1,692 valid responses. This was composed of 10 questions that explored views of specific political parties. The link between citizens and the state is the crux of democratic politics, yet it is crumbling. Numerous studies have diagnosed a crisis in representative politics with decreased participation and growing levels of distrust bringing the legitimacy of democratic institutions into doubt. For many a solution has been offered by digital technology, leading parties to embrace new digital campaigning software. To explore the capacity of digital innovations to renew democracy this study argues that we need to understand the nature of the 'disconnect' between parties and the people. As such, this study departs from traditional analyses of 'digital democracy' by focusing on public attitudes. Adapting the methodological approach used by Allen and Birch (2015) the project will discern how the public and parties conceive democratic linkage in practice and as an ideal, highlighting contradictions and convergence to diagnose the problem. Correlating these insights to the functions of digital software and theories of democratic linkage (Dalton, Farrell and McAllister, 2011) the capacity of digital innovations to renew party politics is considered. To enable analysis 3 work packages (WP) are conducted. WP1: How do parties perceive democratic linkage, and how have parties used digital management systems since 2010? WP1 will first identify available forms of the type of digital innovation of interest to this project - namely 'digital management software' - and will categorise the functions they perform. Second, it will explore and develop theories of democratic linkage to provide a framework for subsequent analysis. Then, using interviews, internal party data and 3 case studies of constituency parties (1 from Labour, the Conservatives and Scottish National Party) the PI and RA will map perceptions of democratic linkage and usage of digital technology. This data will provide new insight on developments in party politics and will be used to produce case study accounts and articles that trace the form of change and consider the impact of digital technology on party organisation. WP2: How do citizens perceive democratic linkage, and how does parties' use of digital management systems affect public attitudes? WP 2 explores the impact of new technology. Working with YouGov the PI will commission 2 surveys. The first will assess public attitudes towards parties', seeking to discern how the public want parties to engage and how they perceive this to work in practice. Data will be analysed to identify conceptions of democratic linkage (WP1) and then compared with party attitudes to identify synergies and incongruities in public and party conceptions. This analysis offers a diagnosis of the state of current linkage, and will identify areas of 'disconnect' to be further examined in WP3. This WP will also probe public attitudes towards parties' use of digital campaigning techniques. Utilising a split sample survey, designed in collaboration with Dr Chris Jones, the PI will assess whether practices such as social media data mining are compatible with public notions of democratic linkage. This will inform an article, infographics and practitioner briefing papers. WP3: Can digital campaigning methods resolve the disconnect between citizens and the state? In collaboration with the think tank Involve, the PI will use 3 deliberative events to explore parties' and citizens' attitudes towards democratic linkage and test the capacity of different forms of digital technology to reconcile these perceptions. Building on survey data these events will test attitudes; exploring whether sustained reflection affects how public and party desires are conceived (drawing on work by Stoker, Hay and Barr, forthcoming). Events will identify ideal forms of linkage - findings that will be used, returning to WP1, to consider the capacity of different forms of digital technology to promote linkage and hence renew party politics. Two public opinion surveys were conducted. For the first, main survey, data was collected by YouGov from 1,517 participants between 17th and 21st November 2017. Participants were identified through YouGov's pre-existing panel of survey participants and were selected to produce a nationally representative sample for the UK population. This process involved panel members being sent a link to complete the survey. Only participants who answered all questions were included in the survey data. Participants who completed the questions in a time shorter than it would take to read the questions were excluded, resulting in a valid sample of 1,497 people (out of an initial sample of 1,517). A second, shorter survey was fielded via YouGov to panel participants on 8th-9th of April 2019, and gained 1,692 valid responses. This was composed of 10 questions that explored views of specific political parties.

  10. e

    Comparative Election Study 1990 (Spouses, 2nd Wave) - Dataset - B2FIND

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Aug 14, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2019). Comparative Election Study 1990 (Spouses, 2nd Wave) - Dataset - B2FIND [Dataset]. https://b2find.eudat.eu/dataset/bf69c0de-34c4-5a7f-8cfa-22029ea6f2c0
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 14, 2019
    Description

    Recording the communication processes between the political system and the voter. Political attitudes; judgement on parties and politicians. Topics: Judgement on the current economic situation in the Federal Republic and expectation for the next year; judgement on the economic situation in the new states and expectation for the next year; most able governing party for positive economic development in the FRG; interest in politics; most important political problems in Germany (rank order); intent to participate in the election; party preference (first vote and second vote); expected winner of the coming Federal Parliament election; sympathy scale for Federal Chancellor Kohl and candidate for chancellor Lafontaine; preference for federal chancellor; preference for governmental or market economy solution of the economic problems in the new states; assumed position of the individual parties on this question; attitude to restriction of the right to asylum, the question of abortion as well as assumed position of the parties on these questions; preference of financing unity through increased indebtedness or tax increases (scale) and assumed position of the parties on this; membership in organizations, trade union, associations and initiatives and stating personally most important organization; membership in a party; frequency of discussions with partner through life about political topics; stating the political topics; frequency of diverging opinions; religious affiliation; year of birth; month of birth. In the East the following additional question was posed: behavior at the polls (second vote) at the last state parliament election. Interviewer rating: sex of respondent. Erfassung der Kommunikationsprozesse zwischen dem politischen System und dem Wähler. Politische Einstellungen; Beurteilung von Parteien und Politikern. Themen: Beurteilung der derzeitigen wirtschaftlichen Lage in der Bundesrepublik und Erwartung für das nächste Jahr; Beurteilung der wirtschaftlichen Lage in den neuen Bundesländern und Erwartung für das nächste Jahr; kompetenteste Regierungspartei für eine positive Wirtschaftsentwicklung in der BRD; Politikinteresse; wichtigste politische Probleme in Deutschland (Rangfolge); Wahlbeteiligungsabsicht; Parteipräferenz (Erststimme und Zweitstimme); erwarteter Wahlgewinner der kommenden Bundestagswahl; Sympathie-Skalometer für Bundeskanzler Kohl und Kanzlerkandidat Lafontaine; Bundeskanzlerpräferenz; Präferenz für staatliche oder marktwirtschaftliche Lösung der wirtschaftlichen Probleme in den neuen Bundesländern; vermuteter Standpunkt der einzelnen Parteien in dieser Frage; Einstellung zur Einschränkung des Asylrechts, zur Frage der Schwangerschaftsabbrüche sowie vermutete Standpunkte der Parteien in diesen Fragen; Präferenz der Finanzierung der Einheit über Mehrverschuldung oder Steuererhöhungen (Skalometer) und vermuteter Standpunkt der Parteien dazu; Mitgliedschaft in Organisationen, Gewerkschaft, Verbänden und Initiativen und Angabe der persönlich wichtigsten Organisation; Mitgliedschaft in einer Partei; Häufigkeit von Diskussionen mit dem Lebenspartner über politische Themen; Angabe der politischen Themen; Häufigkeit divergierender Meinungen; Religionszugehörigkeit; Geschlecht; Alter. Im Osten wurde zusätzlich gefragt: Wahlverhalten (Zweitstimme) bei der letzten Landtagswahl. Interviewerrating: Befragtengeschlecht.

  11. Reasons for using first-party data in marketing personalization worldwide...

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 10, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Reasons for using first-party data in marketing personalization worldwide 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1332293/reason-use-first-party-data-marketing-personalization/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 10, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Apr 2022 - May 2022
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    During a 2022 survey carried out among business managers and above who were familiar with their company's customer experience, marketing tech, or customer data strategies from various countries across the globe, ** percent stated their brands used exclusively first-party data to personalize customer experiences because the data is higher quality than other data (e.g., first- or second-party data); ** percent said first-party data was easier to manage because their brand owned it.

  12. e

    Valid second votes (Representative Federal election statistics): Federal...

    • data.europa.eu
    wms
    Updated Dec 28, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Valid second votes (Representative Federal election statistics): Federal states, cut-off date, parties, age groups [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/30303031-3431-4032-312d-303030350001
    Explore at:
    wmsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 28, 2022
    Description

    Valid second votes (Representative Federal election statistics): Federal states, cut-off date, parties, age groups

  13. d

    Fiscal Year 2020 Party Caucus Subsidy 2nd Quarter Report

    • data.gov.tw
    xlsx
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Legislative Yuan (Branch), Fiscal Year 2020 Party Caucus Subsidy 2nd Quarter Report [Dataset]. https://data.gov.tw/en/datasets/127422
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    The Legislative Yuan (Branch)
    License

    https://data.gov.tw/licensehttps://data.gov.tw/license

    Description

    Subsidies from public funds to private groups and individuals quarterly report

  14. e

    Federal Parliament Election 1976 (Panel: 2nd Wave, October 1975) - Dataset -...

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Oct 22, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2023). Federal Parliament Election 1976 (Panel: 2nd Wave, October 1975) - Dataset - B2FIND [Dataset]. https://b2find.eudat.eu/dataset/1d10a38f-a2b0-5bb9-b94b-0740e1ca42dc
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 22, 2023
    Description

    Attitude to political and economic questions. Judgement on parties and politicians in view of the next Federal Parliament election. Image of the candidates for chancellor. Topics: 1. judgement on political problems and abilities to solve them: importance of political problems; issue competence of the parties; most important political events of the past; most important political task in the state and party with the greatest ability to solve this at state level; trust in selected government and democratic institutions and information on changes in trust in these institutions. 2. political interest and evaluation of parties: personal agreements with parties and politicians; assessment of the perceived agreement between selected politicians and their parties on a scale; image of the parties in form of social groups primarily represented by these parties; preferred candidate for chancellor to solve economic problems; image of the candidates for chancellor (semantic differentials); coalition preference; reasons for government participation by the FDP; party preference (ballot procedure for first vote and second vote); interest in politics. 3. judgement on the economic situation: judgement on the economic situation of the FRG as well as its development; judgement on personal economic situation; economic expectations for the future; expected price development and personal income development; expected development of personal standard of living; assessment of general economic situation as crisis and judgement on its significance; personal impact of the economic crisis; personal impact of short time work or unemployment; significance of the governing party for the economic situation; privileged and underprivileged social groups in the FRG; judgement on the development of security in the world and in the country after the conference on disarmament and security; level of regular savings deposits. Demography: age; sex; marital status; school education; employment; occupational satisfaction; place of work at place of residence; judgement on personal occupation prospects; household income; number of income recipients; size of household; respondent is head of household; self-assessment of social class; degree of urbanization; Interviewer rating: housing situation; length of interview; 4. miscellaneous: characterization of residential surroundings Interviewer rating: interest of respondent in survey topic; assessment of degree of difficulty of the survey for the respondent; length of interview; state. Einstellung zu politischen und wirtschaftlichen Fragen. Beurteilung von Parteien und Politikern im Hinblick auf die nächste Bundestagswahl. Image der Kanzlerkandidaten. Themen: 1.) Beurteilung politischer Probleme und der Lösungskompetenzen: Wichtigkeit politischer Probleme; Issue-Kompetenz der Parteien; wichtigste politische Ereignisse der Vergangenheit; wichtigste politische Aufgabe im Bundesland und Partei mit der größten Lösungskompetenz auf Landesebene; Vertrauen in ausgewählte staatliche und demokratische Institutionen und Angabe von Vertrauensänderungen zu diesen Institutionen. 2.) Politisches Interesse und Parteienbewertung: Eigene Übereinstimmungen mit Parteien und Politikern; Einschätzung der wahrgenommenen Übereinstimmung zwischen ausgewählten Politikern und ihren Parteien auf einem Skalometer; Image der Parteien in Form der primär durch diese Parteien repräsentierten gesellschaftlichen Gruppen; präferierter Kanzlerkandidat zur Lösung der wirtschaftlichen Probleme; Image der Kanzlerkanditaten (semantische Differentiale); Koalitionspräferenz; Gründe für eine Regierungsbeteiligung der FDP; Parteipräferenz (Stimmzettelverfahren für Erststimme und Zweitstimme); Politikinteresse. 3.) Beurteilung der Wirtschaftslage: Beurteilung der wirtschaftlichen Lage der BRD sowie ihrer Entwicklung; Beurteilung der persönlichen Wirtschaftssituation; Wirtschaftserwartungen für die Zukunft; erwartete Preisentwicklung und eigene Einkommensentwicklung; erwartete Entwicklung des eigenen Lebensstandards; Einschätzung der allgemeinen wirtschaftlichen Situation als Krise und Beurteilung ihrer Bedeutung; eigene Betroffenheit von der Wirtschaftskrise; eigene Betroffenheit von Kurzarbeit oder Arbeitslosigkeit; Bedeutung der Regierungspartei für die wirtschaftliche Situation; privilegierte und unterprivilegierte gesellschaftliche Gruppen in der BRD; Beurteilung der Entwicklung der Sicherheit in der Welt und im Lande nach der Konferenz über Abrüstung und Sicherheit; Höhne regelmäßiger Spareinlagen. Demographie: Alter; Geschlecht; Familienstand; Schulbildung; Berufstätigkeit; Berufszufriedenheit; Arbeitsplatz am Wohnort; Beurteilung der persönlichen Berufsaussichten; Haushaltseinkommen; Anzahl der Einkommensempfänger Haushaltsgröße; Befragter ist Haushaltsvorstand; Selbsteinschätzung der Schichtzugehörigkeit; Urbanisierungsgrad; Interviewerrating: Wohnsituation; Interviewdauer; 4.) Sonstiges: und ; Charakterisierung des Wohnumfelds Interviewerrating: Interesse des Befragten am Befragungsthema; Einschätzung des Schwierigkeitsgrads der Befragung für den Befragten; Interviewdauer; Bundesland.

  15. d

    Master Data: State, Constituency type and Party-wise List of Candidates who...

    • dataful.in
    Updated May 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataful (Factly) (2025). Master Data: State, Constituency type and Party-wise List of Candidates who have Won and who stood as Runners (2nd position) in all the Lok Sabha Elections [Dataset]. https://dataful.in/datasets/18038
    Explore at:
    csv, xlsx, application/x-parquetAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataful (Factly)
    License

    https://dataful.in/terms-and-conditionshttps://dataful.in/terms-and-conditions

    Area covered
    India
    Variables measured
    Winners and Runners in the Lok Sabha Elections
    Description

    The Dataset contains data on Year-wise, State-wise, Constituency Type-wise and Party-wise List of Candidates who have Won and List of Candidates who stood as Runners (2nd position) in the Lok Sabha elections. The data is available across all the Lok Sabha elections held in India

  16. f

    Data.

    • figshare.com
    zip
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hezhi Chen; Zhijia Zeng; Jianhong Ma (2023). Data. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229510.s001
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Hezhi Chen; Zhijia Zeng; Jianhong Ma
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
  17. Feed Import Data | 2Nd Notify Party Klearnow Corp

    • seair.co.in
    Updated Apr 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Seair Exim (2025). Feed Import Data | 2Nd Notify Party Klearnow Corp [Dataset]. https://www.seair.co.in
    Explore at:
    .bin, .xml, .csv, .xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Seair Exim Solutions
    Authors
    Seair Exim
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.

  18. d

    Replication Data for: ‘Representation of Partisan, Territorial, and...

    • dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 22, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Finke, Patrick; Müller, Markus M.; Souris, Antonios; Sturm, Roland; Zensen, Richard (2023). Replication Data for: ‘Representation of Partisan, Territorial, and Institutional Interests in Second Chambers: Evidence from the German Bundesrat and its Committees’ [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/L4KQ76
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Finke, Patrick; Müller, Markus M.; Souris, Antonios; Sturm, Roland; Zensen, Richard
    Description

    This dataset has been developed within the research project ‘Party Politics in the German Bundesrat. Voting behaviour in the Bundesrat Committees’, funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Grant Number 290366311]. It contains information on 51,233 roll call votes in the Bundesrat committees. The data have been analyzed in our contribution to ‘Publius: The Journal of Federalism’ to revisit the question of interest representation, investigating whether partisanship matters in federal second chambers, or whether territorial and other interests such as institutional concerns are more important.

  19. g

    Data from: Dataset of Party System Change in Italian Regions. 1995-2015

    • search.gesis.org
    • pollux-fid.de
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 21, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bolgherini, Silvia; Grimaldi, Selena (2017). Dataset of Party System Change in Italian Regions. 1995-2015 [Dataset]. https://search.gesis.org/research_data/SDN-10.7802-1484
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS, Köln
    GESIS search
    Authors
    Bolgherini, Silvia; Grimaldi, Selena
    License

    https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms

    Description

    The dataset provides data on party system change in the 15 Italian Ordinary Statute Regions (OSRs) for the 1995-2015 period. The following 10 indicators are taken into account: Total number of Lists (TL); Number of effective parties in terms of votes (NEPv); Number of effective parties in terms of seats (NEPs); Standard Innovation Rate (SIR), Effective Innovation Rate (EIR); Total electoral Volatility (TV); Total Mergers (TM); Total Splits (TS); Bipolarism Index (BPL); Bipartitism Index (BPT). The dataset covers the entirely the period of the so-called Italian Second Republic (1992-2013), namely the period following the judicial inquiry Clean Hands, which caused the implosion of the previous party system. Although the end of the Second Republic is still disputed, we consider the electoral earthquake of the 2103 at the national level (Chiaramonte and De Sio 2013; Itanes 2013) to be another turn around as far as party system change is concerned. Altogether 14 elections are taken into account and grouped in electoral cycles as follows: first cycle 1990 (elections May 6, 1990); second cycle 1995 (April 23, 1995); third cycle 2000 (April 16, 2000 and November 11, 2001); fourth cycle 2005 (April 3, 2005, April 17, 2005 and November 5, 2006); fifth cycle 2010 (December 14, 2008; March 28, 2010; and October 16, 2011); sixth cycle 2015 (February 24, 2013; November 17, 2013; May 25, 2014; November 23, 2014; and May 31, 2005).

  20. e

    Federal Survey 1978 (2nd Wave, May 1978) - Dataset - B2FIND

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Oct 20, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2023). Federal Survey 1978 (2nd Wave, May 1978) - Dataset - B2FIND [Dataset]. https://b2find.eudat.eu/dataset/94100300-ada2-5241-bb6f-9555a82797c7
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 20, 2023
    Description

    Judgement on parties and politicians. Topics: political interest; judgement on economic situation in the Federal Republic; party preference (ballot procedure); behavior at the polls in the last Federal Parliament election; trust in selected institutions such as chancellor, government, Federal Parliament, judiciary, police etc.; sympathy scale and assessment of political capability of the parties as well as of the most important federal politicians; assessment of reliability of political sources of information; behavior at the polls given a nation-wide separation of CDU and CSU; judgement on economic situation. The following questions were also posed in Lower Saxony: judgement on the economic situation of Lower Saxony; most important political tasks in the state and issue ability of parties and politicians; knowledge about the Green Lists and the political matter of concern of this party; attitude to the Greens gaining seats in the Lower Saxony state parliament; classification of state parties and politicians on a left-right continuum; self-classification on a left-right continuum; assessment of the position of the Lower Saxony CDU in comparison to the federal CDU; preference for prime minister; party preference for the next state parliament election; judgement on the job of the CDU/FDP coalition up to now in Lower Saxony as well as attitude to a possible model character of this coalition at federal level. Demography: age; sex; marital status; number of children; ages of children (classified); religious denomination; frequency of church attendance; school education; occupational position; employment; income; household income; size of household; composition of household; respondent is head of household; characteristics of head of household; party inclination; party identification; self-assessment of social class; city size; state; union membership; party inclination; party identification; number of persons in household with their own income. Interviewer rating: length of interview. Also encoded was: administrative district; political municipality size class; degree of urbanization. Beurteilung von Parteien und Politikern. Themen: Politisches Interesse; Beurteilung der wirtschaftlichen Lage in der Bundesrepublik; Parteipräferenz (Stimmzettelverfahren); Wahlverhalten bei der letzten Bundestagswahl; Vertrauen in ausgewählte Institutionen wie Kanzler, Regierung, Bundestag, Gerichte, Polizei usw.; Sympathie-Skalometer und Einschätzung der politischen Leistungsfähigkeit der Parteien sowie der wichtigsten Bundespolitiker; Einschätzung der Zuverlässigkeit politischer Informationsquellen; Wahlverhalten bei einer bundesweiten Trennung von CDU und CSU; Beurteilung der wirtschaftlichen Lage. In Niedersachsen wurde zusätzlich gefragt: Beurteilung der wirtschaftlichen Lage Niedersachsens; wichtigste politische Aufgaben im Bundesland und Issue-Kompetenz der Parteien und Politiker; Kenntnis der Grünen Listen und des politischen Anliegens dieser Partei; Einstellung zu einem Eintritt der Grünen in den niedersächsischen Landtag; Einstufung der Landesparteien und Politiker auf einem Links-Rechts-Kontinuum; Selbsteinstufung auf einem Links-Rechts-Kontinuum; Einschätzung der Stellung der niedersächsischen CDU im Vergleich zur Bundes-CDU; Ministerpräsidentenpräferenz; Parteipräferenz für die nächste Landtagswahl; Beurteilung der bisherigen Koalitionsarbeit der CDU/FDP in Niedersachsen sowie Einstellung zu einem möglichen Modellcharakter dieser Koalition auf Bundesebene. Demographie: Alter; Geschlecht; Familienstand; Kinderzahl; Alter der Kinder (klassiert); Konfession; Kirchgangshäufigkeit; Schulbildung; berufliche Position; Berufstätigkeit; Einkommen; Haushaltseinkommen; Haushaltsgröße; Haushaltszusammensetzung; Befragter ist Haushaltsvorstand; Charakteristika des Haushaltsvorstands; Parteineigung; Parteiidentifikation; Selbsteinschätzung der Schichtzugehörigkeit; Ortgröße; Bundesland; Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft; Parteineigung; Parteiidentifikation; Anzahl der Personen im Haushalt mit eigenem Einkommen. Interviewerrating: Interviewdauer. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Regierungsbezirk; politische Gemeindegrößenklasse; Verstädterungsgrad.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). Third-party performances in U.S. presidential elections 1892-2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1134513/third-party-performance-us-elections/
Organization logo

Third-party performances in U.S. presidential elections 1892-2020

Explore at:
3 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jul 4, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

The 1860 election cemented the Republican Party's position as one of the two major parties in U.S. politics, along with the already-established Democratic Party. Since this time, all U.S. presidents have been affiliated with these two parties, and their candidates have generally performed the best in each presidential election. In spite of this two-party dominance, there have always been third-party or independent candidates running on the ballot, either on a nationwide, regional or state level. No third-party candidate has ever won a U.S. election, although there have been several occasions where they have carried states or split the vote with major party candidates. Today, the largest third-party in U.S. politics is the Libertarian Party, who are considered to be socially liberal, but economically conservative; in the 2016 election, their nominee, Gary Johnson, secured just over three percent of the popular vote, while their latest candidate, Jo Jorgenson, received just over one percent of the vote in the 2020 election.

Theodore Roosevelt The most successful third-party nominee was Theodore Roosevelt in the 1912 election, who was the only third-party candidate to come second in a U.S. election. The former president had become disillusioned with his successor's growing conservatism, and challenged the incumbent President Taft for the Republican nomination in 1912. Roosevelt proved to be the most popular candidate in the primaries, however Taft had already secured enough Republican delegates in the south to seal the nomination. Roosevelt then used this split in the Republican Party to form his own, Progressive Party, and challenged both major party candidates for the presidency (even taking a bullet in the process). In the end, Roosevelt carried six states, and won over 27 percent of the popular vote, while Taft carried just two states with 23 percent of the vote; this split in the Republican Party allowed the Democratic nominee, Woodrow Wilson, to win 82 percent of the electoral votes despite only winning 42 percent of the popular vote.

Other notable performances The last third-party candidate to win electoral votes was George Wallace* in the 1968 election. The Democratic Party had been the most popular party in the south since before the Civil War, however their increasingly progressive policies in the civil rights era alienated many of their southern voters. Wallace ran on a white supremacist and pro-segregationist platform and won the popular vote in five states. This was a similar story to that of Storm Thurmond, twenty years earlier.

In the 1992 election, Independent candidate Ross Perot received almost one fifth of the popular vote. Although he did not win any electoral votes, Perot split the vote so much that he prevented either Clinton or Bush Sr. from winning a majority in any state except Arkansas (Clinton's home state). Perot ran again in 1996, but with less than half the share of votes he received four years previously; subsequent studies and polls have shown that Perot took an equal number of votes from both of the major party candidates in each election.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu