Abstract In this work, we report the mapping of electrical equipotential lines (1D) and equipotential surfaces (3D) using the free Quantum Geographic information system (QGIS) software. For this purpose, experiments taking into account, four different electrical configurations were performed on physics classes of undergraduate students, using two conductors of opposite electrical charges for each experiment. For the first experiment two copper parallel linear conductors; for the second, a copper parallel linear conductor with a small circular ring acting as a point charge; for the third, two concentric circular ring and for the fourth one a semicircular ring with a small circular ring acting as point charge. The experimental data were treated and interpolated in the, open source, QGIS software, used in geoprocessing, to map the electrical equipotential planes and surfaces.

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of approximately $45 billion by 2033. Key drivers include the rising adoption of cloud-based GIS solutions, enhanced data analytics capabilities, the proliferation of location-based services, and the growing need for precise spatial data analysis in various industries like urban planning, geological exploration, and water resource management. The market is segmented by application (Geological Exploration, Water Conservancy Projects, Urban Planning, Others) and type (Cloud-based, Web-based). Cloud-based solutions are gaining significant traction due to their scalability, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. The increasing availability of high-resolution satellite imagery and advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are further fueling market expansion. While data security concerns and the high initial investment costs for some advanced solutions present restraints, the overall market outlook remains positive, with significant opportunities for both established players and emerging technology providers. Geographical expansion is another key aspect of market growth. North America and Europe currently hold a significant market share, owing to established GIS infrastructure and early adoption of advanced technologies. However, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness rapid growth in the coming years, driven by rising government investments in infrastructure development and increasing urbanization in countries like China and India. Competitive dynamics are shaping the market, with major players like Esri, Autodesk, Hexagon, and Mapbox competing on the basis of software features, data integration capabilities, and customer support. The emergence of open-source GIS solutions like QGIS and GRASS GIS is also challenging the dominance of proprietary software, offering cost-effective alternatives for various applications. The continued development and integration of advanced technologies like 3D mapping, real-time data visualization, and location intelligence will further enhance the capabilities of GIS mapping tools, driving market expansion and innovation across various sectors.

The geographical mapping software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated $45 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The rise of cloud-based solutions offers enhanced accessibility, scalability, and collaboration features, attracting a broader user base. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) technology in various applications, including geological exploration, water conservancy projects, and urban planning, is significantly boosting market demand. Government initiatives promoting digital infrastructure development and smart city projects are further contributing to market growth. The rising need for precise location-based services and real-time data analysis across sectors like transportation, logistics, and agriculture also plays a significant role. While data security concerns and the high initial investment costs associated with implementing sophisticated mapping software can act as restraints, the overall market outlook remains highly positive. The market segmentation reveals strong growth in both cloud-based and web-based solutions. Cloud-based solutions are gaining traction due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while web-based solutions remain popular for their ease of use and accessibility. The application segment demonstrates considerable potential, with geological exploration and urban planning leading the way. This suggests a robust future for geographical mapping software, particularly in areas requiring detailed spatial analysis and data visualization. Geographical regions like North America and Europe currently hold a significant market share, but the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness rapid growth in the coming years driven by increasing infrastructure development and technological advancements. Competition in the market is intense, with established players like Esri and Autodesk alongside emerging innovative companies vying for market share. The continuous evolution of GIS technology, encompassing features like AI-powered analytics and 3D mapping capabilities, is set to further shape market dynamics in the years to come.

This dataset contains projections of shoreline change and uncertainty bands across California for future scenarios of sea-level rise (SLR). Projections were made using the Coastal Storm Modeling System - Coastal One-line Assimilated Simulation Tool (CoSMoS-COAST), a numerical model run in an ensemble forced with global-to-local nested wave models and assimilated with satellite-derived shoreline (SDS) observations across the state. Scenarios include 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250, 300 and 500 centimeters (cm) of SLR by the year 2100. Output for SLR of 0 cm is also included, reflective of conditions in 2000. This model shows change in shoreline positions along pre-determined cross-shore transects, considering sea level, wave conditions, along-shore/cross-shore sediment transport, long-term trends due to sediment supply, and estimated variability due to unresolved processes (as described in Vitousek and others, 2021). Variability associated with complex coastal processes (for example, beach cusps/undulations and shore-attached sandbars) are included via a noise parameter in a model, which is tuned using observations of shoreline change at each transect and run in an ensemble of 200 simulations; this approach allows for a representation of statistical variability in a model that is assimilated with sequences of noisy observations. The model synthesizes and improves upon numerous, well-established shoreline models in the scientific literature; processes and methods are described in this metadata (see lineage and process steps), but also described in more detail in Vitousek and others 2017, 2021, and 2023. Output includes different cases covering important model behaviors (cases are described in process steps of this metadata). KMZ data are readily viewable in Google Earth. For best display of results, it is recommended to turn off any 3D features or terrain. For technical users and researchers, shapefile and KMZ data can be ingested into geographic information system (GIS) software such as Global Mapper or QGIS.

Dataset for: Bedding scale correlation on Mars in western Arabia Terra

A.M. Annex et al.

Data Product Overview

This repository contains all source data for the publication. Below is a description of each general data product type, software that can load the data, and a list of the file names along with the short description of the data product.

HiRISE Digital Elevation Models (DEMs).

HiRISE DEMs produced using the Ames Stereo Pipeline are in geotiff format ending with ‘*X_0_DEM-adj.tif’, the “X” prefix denotes the spatial resolution of the data product in meters. Geotiff files are able to be read by free GIS software like QGIS.

HiRISE map-projected imagery (DRGs).

Map-projected HiRISE images produced using the Ames Stereo Pipeline are in geotiff format ending with ‘*0_Y_DRG-cog.tif’, the “Y” prefix denotes the spatial resolution of the data product in centimeters. Geotiff files are able to be read by free GIS software like QGIS. The DRG files are formatted as COG-geotiffs for enhanced compression and ease of use.

3D Topography files (.ply).

Traingular Mesh versions of the HiRISE/CTX topography data used for 3D figures in “.ply” format. Meshes are greatly geometrically simplified from source files. Topography files can be loaded in a variety of open source tools like ParaView and Meshlab. Textures can be applied using embedded texture coordinates.

3D Geological Model outputs (.vtk)

VTK 3D file format files of model output over the spatial domain of each study site. VTK files can be loaded by ParaView open source software. The “block” files contain the model evaluation over a regular grid over the model extent. The “surfaces” files contain just the bedding surfaces as interpolated from the “block” files using the marching cubes algorithm.

Geological Model geologic maps (geologic_map.tif).

Geologic maps from geological models are standard geotiffs readable by conventional GIS software. The maximum value for each geologic map is the “no-data” value for the map. Geologic maps are calculated at a lower resolution than the topography data for storage efficiency.

Beds Geopackage File (.gpkg).

Geopackage vector data file containing all mapped layers and associated metadata including dip corrected bed thickness as well as WKB encoded 3D linestrings representing the sampled topography data to which the bedding orientations were fit. Geopackage files can be read using GIS software like QGIS and ArcGIS as well as the OGR/GDAL suite. A full description of each column in the file is provided below.

    Column
    Type
    Description




    uuid
    String
    unique identifier


    stratum_order
    Real
    0-indexed bed order


    section
    Real
    section number


    layer_id
    Real
    bed number/index


    layer_id_bk
    Real
    unused backup bed number/index


    source_raster
    String
    dem file path used


    raster
    String
    dem file name


    gsd
    Real
    ground sampling distant for dem


    wkn
    String
    well known name for dem


    rtype
    String
    raster type


    minx
    Real
    minimum x position of trace in dem crs


    miny
    Real
    minimum y position of trace in dem crs


    maxx
    Real
    maximum x position of trace in dem crs


    maxy
    Real
    maximum y position of trace in dem crs


    method
    String
    internal interpolation method


    sl
    Real
    slope in degrees


    az
    Real
    azimuth in degrees


    error
    Real
    maximum error ellipse angle


    stdr
    Real
    standard deviation of the residuals


    semr
    Real
    standard error of the residuals


    X
    Real
    mean x position in CRS


    Y
    Real
    mean y position in CRS


    Z
    Real
    mean z position in CRS


    b1
    Real
    plane coefficient 1


    b2
    Real
    plane coefficient 2


    b3
    Real
    plane coefficient 3


    b1_se
    Real
    standard error plane coefficient 1


    b2_se
    Real
    standard error plane coefficient 2


    b3_se
    Real
    standard error plane coefficient 3


    b1_ci_low
    Real
    plane coefficient 1 95% confidence interval low


    b1_ci_high
    Real
    plane coefficient 1 95% confidence interval high


    b2_ci_low
    Real
    plane coefficient 2 95% confidence interval low


    b2_ci_high
    Real
    plane coefficient 2 95% confidence interval high


    b3_ci_low
    Real
    plane coefficient 3 95% confidence interval low


    b3_ci_high
    Real
    plane coefficient 3 95% confidence interval high


    pca_ev_1
    Real
    pca explained variance ratio pc 1


    pca_ev_2
    Real
    pca explained variance ratio pc 2


    pca_ev_3
    Real
    pca explained variance ratio pc 3


    condition_number
    Real
    condition number for regression


    n
    Integer64
    number of data points used in regression


    rls
    Integer(Boolean)
    unused flag


    demeaned_regressions
    Integer(Boolean)
    centering indicator


    meansl
    Real
    mean section slope


    meanaz
    Real
    mean section azimuth


    angular_error
    Real
    angular error for section


    mB_1
    Real
    mean plane coefficient 1 for section


    mB_2
    Real
    mean plane coefficient 2 for section


    mB_3
    Real
    mean plane coefficient 3 for section


    R
    Real
    mean plane normal orientation vector magnitude


    num_valid
    Integer64
    number of valid planes in section


    meanc
    Real
    mean stratigraphic position


    medianc
    Real
    median stratigraphic position


    stdc
    Real
    standard deviation of stratigraphic index


    stec
    Real
    standard error of stratigraphic index


    was_monotonic_increasing_layer_id
    Integer(Boolean)
    monotonic layer_id after projection to stratigraphic index


    was_monotonic_increasing_meanc
    Integer(Boolean)
    monotonic meanc after projection to stratigraphic index


    was_monotonic_increasing_z
    Integer(Boolean)
    monotonic z increasing after projection to stratigraphic index


    meanc_l3sigma_std
    Real
    lower 3-sigma meanc standard deviation


    meanc_u3sigma_std
    Real
    upper 3-sigma meanc standard deviation


    meanc_l2sigma_sem
    Real
    lower 3-sigma meanc standard error


    meanc_u2sigma_sem
    Real
    upper 3-sigma meanc standard error


    thickness
    Real
    difference in meanc


    thickness_fromz
    Real
    difference in Z value


    dip_cor
    Real
    dip correction


    dc_thick
    Real
    thickness after dip correction


    dc_thick_fromz
    Real
    z thickness after dip correction


    dc_thick_dev
    Integer(Boolean)
    dc_thick <= total mean dc_thick


    dc_thick_fromz_dev
    Integer(Boolean)
    dc_thick <= total mean dc_thick_fromz


    thickness_fromz_dev
    Integer(Boolean)
    dc_thick <= total mean thickness_fromz


    dc_thick_dev_bg
    Integer(Boolean)
    dc_thick <= section mean dc_thick


    dc_thick_fromz_dev_bg
    Integer(Boolean)
    dc_thick <= section mean dc_thick_fromz


    thickness_fromz_dev_bg
    Integer(Boolean)
    dc_thick <= section mean thickness_fromz


    slr
    Real
    slope in radians


    azr
    Real
    azimuth in radians


    meanslr
    Real
    mean slope in radians


    meanazr
    Real
    mean azimuth in radians


    angular_error_r
    Real
    angular error of section in radians


    pca_ev_1_ok
    Integer(Boolean)
    pca_ev_1 < 99.5%


    pca_ev_2_3_ratio
    Real
    pca_ev_2/pca_ev_3


    pca_ev_2_3_ratio_ok
    Integer(Boolean)
    pca_ev_2_3_ratio > 15


    xyz_wkb_hex
    String
    hex encoded wkb geometry for all points used in regression

Geological Model input files (.gpkg).

Four geopackage (.gpkg) files represent the input dataset for the geological models, one per study site as specified in the name of the file. The files contain most of the columns described above in the Beds geopackage file, with the following additional columns. The final seven columns (azimuth, dip, polarity, formation, X, Y, Z) constituting the actual parameters used by the geological model (GemPy).

    Column
    Type
    Description




    azimuth_mean
    String
    Mean section dip azimuth 


    azimuth_indi
    Real
    Individual bed azimuth


    azimuth
    Real
    Azimuth of trace used by the geological model


    dip
    Real
    Dip for the trace used by the geological mode


    polarity
    Real
    Polarity of the dip vector normal vector 


    formation
    String
    String representation of layer_id required for GemPy models


    X
    Real
    X position in the CRS of the sampled point on the trace


    Y
    Real
    Y position in the CRS of the sampled point on the trace


    Z
    Real
    Z position in the CRS of the sampled point on the trace

Stratigraphic Column Files (.gpkg).

Stratigraphic columns computed from the Geological Models come in three kinds of Geopackage vector files indicated by the postfixes _sc, rbsc, and rbssc. File names include the wkn site name.

sc (_sc.gpkg).

Geopackage vector data file containing measured bed thicknesses from Geological Model joined with corresponding Beds Geopackage file, subsetted partially. The columns largely overlap with the the list above for the Beds Geopackage but with the following additions

    Column
    Type
    Description




    X
    Real
    X position of thickness measurement


    Y
    Real
    Y position of thickness measurement


    Z
    Real
    Z position of thickness measurement


    formation
    String
    Model required string representation of bed index


    bed thickness (m)
    Real
    difference of bed elevations


    azimuths
    Real
    azimuth as measured from model in degrees


    dip_degrees
    Real
    dip as measured from model in

This project aimed to conduct a 3D visibility analysis of the Pinakes at the Heraion of Olympia, using the open-source software Blender and QGIS. The project builds on previous work by other researchers on the pinakes at the site, and aims to use the 3D model to better understand the visibility of the pinakes from different viewpoints near the temple. The results were visualized using raster maps for the better understanding of the function of the Pinakes in the context of the Heraion.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation Area, South Dakota is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (prir_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (prir_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (prir_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (badl_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (badl_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (prir_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the badl_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (prir_geology_metadata.txt or prir_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:125,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 63.5 meters or 208.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Soil erosion is a major threat to soil fertility, food security and water resources. Besides a quantitative assessment of soil loss, the dynamics of erosion-affected arable soil surfaces still poses challenges regarding field methods and predictions because of scale-dependent and soil management-related complex soil-crop-atmosphere processes. The objective was to test a photogrammetric Structure-from-Motion (SfM) technique for the mm-scale mapping of the soil surface micro-topography that allows the monitoring without special equipment and with widely available cameras. The test was carried out in May 2018 on three plots of 1.5 m2 (upper-, middle-, and footslope) covering surface structural features (tractor wheel lane, seed rows) along a Maize-cultivated hillslope with a coarse-textured topsoil and a runoff monitoring station. The changes in mm-scaled surface micro-topography were derived from repeatedly photographed images of the same surface area during a 2-weeks period with two rain events. A freely available SfM-program (VisualSfM) and the QGIS software were used to generate 3D-models of the surface topography. Soil cores (100 cm3) were sampled to gravimetrically determine the topsoil bulk density. The micro-topographical changes resulting from rainfall–induced soil mass redistribution within the plots were determined from the differences in SfM maps before and after rain. The largest decrease in mean soil surface elevation and roughness was observed after rain for the middle slope plot and primarily in initially less compacted regions. The spatially-distributed intra-plot changes in soil mass at the mm-scale derived from the digital micro-topography models indicated that local depressions were filled with sediments from surrounding knolls during rainfall. The estimated mass loss determined with the SfM technique decreased, if core sample-based soil settlement was considered. The effect of changes in the soil bulk density could be described after calibration also with an empirical model suggested in the Root-Zone-Water-Quality-Model. Uncertainties in the presented plot-scale SfM-technique were due to geo-referencing and the numerical limitations in the freely available SfM-software. The photogrammetric technique provided valuable information on soil surface structure parameters such as surface roughness. The successful application of SfM with widely available cameras and freely available software might stimulate the monitoring of erosion in regions with limited accessibility.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Yosemite National Park and Vicinity, California is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (yose_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (yose_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (yose_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (yose_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (yose_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (yose_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the yose_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (yose_geology_metadata.txt or yose_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:62,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 31.8 meters or 104.2 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area and Vicinity, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (dewa_surficial_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (dewa_surficial_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (dewa_surficial_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (dewa_surficial_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (dewa_surficial_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (dewa_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the dewa_surficial_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: New Jersey Geological Survey, Pennsylvania Geological Survey, New York State Museum and U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (dewa_surficial_geology_metadata.txt or dewa_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Chalmette Battlefield Unit and Vicinity, Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve, Louisiana is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (clmt_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (clmt_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (clmt_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (jela_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (jela_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (clmt_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the jela_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Louisiana Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (clmt_geology_metadata.txt or clmt_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:100,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 50.8 meters or 166.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Isle Royale National Park and Vicinity, Michigan is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (isro_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (isro_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (isro_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (isro_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (isro_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (isro_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the isro_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (isro_geology_metadata.txt or isro_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:62,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 31.8 meters or 104.2 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Buffalo National River and Vicinity, Arkansas is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (buff_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (buff_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (buff_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (buff_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (buff_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (buff_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the buff_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Arkansas Geological Survey and U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (buff_geology_metadata.txt or buff_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Yellowstone National Park and Vicinity, Wyoming, Montana and Idaho is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (yell_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (yell_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (yell_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) this file (yell_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (yell_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (yell_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the yell_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey and Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (yell_geology_metadata.txt or yell_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:62,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 63.5 meters or 208.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

This dataset contains projections of shoreline change and uncertainty bands for future scenarios of sea-level rise (SLR). Scenarios include 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, and 300 centimeters (cm) of SLR by the year 2100. Output for SLR of 0 cm is also included, reflective of conditions in 2005, in accordance with recent SLR projections and guidance from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA; see process steps).Projections were made using the Coastal Storm Modeling System - Coastal One-line Assimilated Simulation Tool (CoSMoS-COAST), a numerical model (described in Vitousek and others, 2017; 2021; 2023) run in an ensemble forced with global-to-local nested wave models and assimilated with satellite-derived shoreline (SDS) observations. Shoreline positions from models are generated at pre-determined cross-shore transects and output includes different cases covering important model behaviors (cases are described in process steps of metadata; see citations listed in the Cross References section for more details on the methodology and supporting information). This model shows change in shoreline positions along transects, considering sea level, wave conditions, along-shore/cross-shore sediment transport, long-term trends due to sediment supply, and estimated variability due to unresolved processes (as described in Vitousek and others, 2021). Variability associated with complex coastal processes (for example, beach cusps/undulations and shore-attached sandbars) are included via a noise parameter in a model, which is tuned using observations of shoreline change at each transect and run in an ensemble of 200 simulations; this approach allows for a representation of statistical variability in a model that is assimilated with sequences of noisy observations. The model synthesizes and improves upon numerous, well-established shoreline models in the scientific literature; processes and methods are described in this metadata (see lineage and process steps), but also described in more detail in Vitousek and others 2017, 2021, and 2023. KMZ data are readily viewable in Google Earth. For best display of results, it is recommended to turn off any 3D features or terrain. For technical users and researchers, shapefile and KMZ data can be ingested into geographic information system (GIS) software such as Global Mapper or QGIS.