This is a polygon layer of 200-feet buffer area around signalized intersections operated and maintained by the City of Dallas.

For more information about this layer please see the GIS Data Catalog.This area is within 50 feet of a potential landslide hazard area.http://www.kingcounty.gov/~/media/operations/GIS/documents/DPER-LS-hazard-map-disclaimer.aspx

This feature layer is generated from running the Buffer Features solution. Input from Water Distribution Sites were buffered by 1 Mile. This layer contains a buffer of water distribution sites used during the 2021 winter storm response. The distribution site were emergency shelter locations during the 2021 winter storm response. These locations can and will likely change depending on needs of future emergency activations. This data should be verified with Emergency Operation Center leadership. Last updated February 25, 2021

"The Wastewater Treatment Plant and Buffer layer forms part of the Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps for the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

This layer is for the purpose of the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014 only.Please contact Council on 5475 7526 or email mail@sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au for more information on the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

Notes on Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps ─ * Overlays provide a trigger for consideration of an overlay issue to be verified by further on-site investigations. * In certain circumstances pre-existing development approvals may override the operation of an overlay. * The Major Road Corridor and Buffer layer incorporates designated Transport Noise Corridors for the purposes of the Building Act 1975. * In relation to the dedicated public transport corridor (CAMCOS), the alternative alignment (i.e. the northern alignment through Caloundra South) is not the protected alignment by the State Government."

"The Railway Corridor and Buffer layer forms part of the Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps for the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014. This layer is for the purpose of the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014 only.

Please contact Council on 5475 7526 or email mail@sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au for more information on the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

Notes on Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps ─ * Overlays provide a trigger for consideration of an overlay issue to be verified by further on-site investigations. * In certain circumstances pre-existing development approvals may override the operation of an overlay. * The Major Road Corridor and Buffer layer incorporates designated Transport Noise Corridors for the purposes of the Building Act 1975. * In relation to the dedicated public transport corridor (CAMCOS), the alternative alignment (i.e. the northern alignment through Caloundra South) is not the protected alignment by the State Government."

This is a MD iMAP hosted service. Find more information at http://imap.maryland.gov. Forests of Recognized Importance (FORI) areas were previously known as High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) - a term that is used by other forest sustainability certification bodies. These areas (as the Maryland Forest Service chooses to define them) are 100 foot buffers of Stronghold Watersheds (version 5) - Trout bearing streams - streams feeding municipal drinking water reservoirs - and Maryland Department of the Environment Tier II High Quality Waters. Forests intercepting these areas during a management plan review should receive special consideration and protection and be buffered according to the Operations Order. This GIS data is representative of ground conditions - but not to the exclusion of streams (perennial or intermittent) that are not depicted in the data. If a stream (perennial or intermittent) is encountered on the ground - and is not depicted in this data - and meets any of the above criteria - the stream should be considered FORI - and management actions and plans should reflect this designation.Feature Service Link:https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Biota/MD_Forests/FeatureServer ADDITIONAL LICENSE TERMS: The Spatial Data and the information therein (collectively "the Data") is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind either expressed implied or statutory. The user assumes the entire risk as to quality and performance of the Data. No guarantee of accuracy is granted nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event shall the State of Maryland be liable for direct indirect incidental consequential or special damages of any kind. The State of Maryland does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the Data or as a result to changes to the Data nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the Data in any manner or form. The Data can be freely distributed as long as the metadata entry is not modified or deleted. Any data derived from the Data must acknowledge the State of Maryland in the metadata.

Forests of Recognized Importance (FORI) areas were previously known as High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF), a term that is used by other forest sustainability certification bodies. These areas—as the Maryland Forest Service chooses to define them—are 100 foot buffers of Stronghold Watersheds (version 5), Trout bearing streams, streams feeding municipal drinking water reservoirs, and Maryland Department of the Environment Tier II High Quality Waters. Forests intercepting these areas during a management plan review should receive special consideration and protection and be buffered according to the Operations Order. This GIS data is representative of ground conditions, but not to the exclusion of streams (perennial or intermittent) that are not depicted in the data. If a stream (perennial or intermittent) is encountered on the ground, and is not depicted in this data, and meets any of the above criteria, the stream should be considered FORI, and management actions and plans should reflect this designation.This is a MD iMAP hosted service. Find more information at https://imap.maryland.gov.Feature Service Link:https://geodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Biota/MD_Forests/FeatureServer/0

This operation view contains services with shipping, maritime boundaries, and weather information for the west coast of the United States. The services in this web map are powered by ArcGIS GeoEvent Extension for Server and contain alerts for ships in certain boundaries, such as nature preserves, or inclement weather.Some of the widgets contained in this operation view are lists that sort the most important data such as those in geofences and those reporting with hazardous cargo. Data contained in this operation view includes:Maritime Boundaries and Port Information:Maritime Boundaries - Various maritime boundaries information provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAAShipping Information:Proximity Alert - Generated buffer information created from an ArcGIS for GeoEvent Extension for Server processor of military vessels.Ship Position- Simulated shipping information obtained from the US Coast Guard (USCG).Weather Information:Meteorological Service of Environment Canada - Web map service with forecast, analysis, and observation layersforunderstanding current meteorological or oceanographic data.NOAA Lightning Strike Density - Time-enabled map service providing maps of experimental lightning strike density data.NOAA Weather Observations - Time-enabled map service providing map depicting the latest surface weather and marine weather observations.NOAA Weather Radar Mosaic - Time-enabled map service providing maps depicting mosaics of base reflectivity images across the United States.NOAA Weather Satellite Information - Time-enabled map service providing maps depicting visible, infrared, and water vapor imagery.

Several layers were examined as part of the highway improvement needs analysis conducted for the 2017 State Transportation plan.Existing and candidate park and ride lots in the state of Iowa, represented as linear features. Features were created using a 2-mile buffer around each lot to represent primary routes that could potentially be viable (re)locations for park and ride lots. 2-miles was selected for the buffer area based on the FHWA report "Safety Assessment of Interchange Spacing on Urban Freeways" publication number FHWA-HRT-07-031. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/07031/The Iowa Department of Transportation’s park and ride system consists of state-owned park and ride lots. Many of these lots were developed during the 1980s, primarily in response to a growing demand that resulted from an increase in fuel prices. In most cases, lot development was truly the result of grassroots efforts, with Iowa DOT’s district offices often responding to specific public requests for park and ride facilities. In 2014, The Iowa Park and Ride System Plan was developed. This plan includes an update of the existing inventory, an identification of additional locations suitable for park and ride facilities, and strategies for implementation .The plan will be used by the Iowa DOT to plan, evaluate, and develop a formal state-owned-and-operated system of park and ride facilities. The primary objective of the plan is to provide a location-specific, priority-based park and ride system that allows for coordinated planning and implementation of park and ride facilities. As a part of the plan this database was created to geographically reference both existing state-owned park and ride facilities and ideal candidates for future expansion of the system. This database will also be used in coordination with the statewide rideshare program, so it will also include other existing park and ride facilities not owned by the state or identified in the plan. Ultimately this inventory has two main purposes that can be described generally as internal and external. Internally, the database will be used to keep track of state-owned inventory and identify opportunities for the expansion of the state-owned and operated park and ride system. Externally, the database will be expanded to include a wide array of park and ride facilities across the state of Iowa that can be disseminated to the public via the Iowa DOT website and coordinated with the rideshare program.

Shoreline buffers serve several purposes, including filtering pollutants and sediment from runoff, preventing shoreline erosion, preserving fish and wildlife habitat, screening noise, preserving aesthetic values, and helping to achieve no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Standards for shoreline buffers shall ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and shall preserve the existing character of the shoreline, consistent with the entire SMP.

To support strategic forest management planning, forest operations planning and conservation planning.Buffer zones surrounding mapped watercourses and wetlands where forest activity is regulated on Crown land to maintain water quality and aquatic habitat.

Airport Reference Point Buffers are six-mile buffer rings around each of the public use airport reference points (ARP) in Wisconsin. Buffer rings for each public airport facility type have been developed by WisDOT and are based on requirements outlined in Section 20-55-55 of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation's Facilities Development Manual (FDM). The FAA recommends a distance of 5 miles between the closest point of the airport’s aircraft operations area (AOA) and any hazardous wildlife attractant. The Bureau of Aeronautics has created a six-mile buffer around the Airport Reference Point (ARP) due to the dynamic nature of aircraft operations areas. These areas account for varying distances from the edge of the AOA to the ARP. This data is intended to provide general guidance and airport information for highway construction projects in and around Wisconsin airports, specifically to make contractors and consultants aware of these areas.An airport reference point (ARP) is the center point of an airport, located at the geometric center of all the usable runways. FAA's ADIP site contains the most current airport and aeronautical data available. Airport Reference Points are a separate point feature class.

This data represents the Human Disturbances Dataset for the North Slave Region, South Slave Region, Sahtu Administrative Region, and Inuvik Administrative Region (and/or Inuvialuit Settlement Region)using information from the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board, Wek'eezhii Land and Water Board, Gwich'in Land and Water Board, Sahtu Land and Water Board, Inuvialuit Water Board, and Nunavut Impact Review Board registries by Caslys Consulting Ltd. between 2000 and 2023. (Note this dataset extends across all of the NWT and into a portion of Nunavut to provide information across the Bathurst Caribou Range, which straddles the territorial boundary.).This was part of the Human Disturbance Mapping project for the GNWT, where a series of spatial datasets were created with the key objective to create an accurate and up-to-date human disturbance footprint that can be used to help make future land and water management decisions. These datasets were created based on existing baseline GIS data, aerial and satellite imagery, as well as permit records from registries with associated online archives..Modelling and other landscape GIS analyses that use this information may benefit from combining all point, line and polygon datasets into a single disturbance footprint that best represents the sum of all input files. It is recommended that this process be completed by first applying GIS buffer functions to point and line feature classes. This provides the advantages of having a more true representation of disturbance footprint with the ability to calculate spatially explicit functions, such as determining the area of the total disturbance. Using the ‘PointArea_Ha’ (Permit_Data_Points) and ‘LinearWidth_m’ (Permit_Data_Lines) fields respectively, users can calculate the buffer distance for each record in the point and line feature class files. The values in these fields do not represent the buffer distance itself, but can be used to calculate an appropriate buffer distance that can be added to an additional buffer-distance-field..Using the date fields and seasonal date fields, the user may develop queries that will allow human disturbance information to be displayed for a specific time period. Refer to Section 3.2 in the Human Disturbance Mapping Report (Caslys, 2015) which lists the fields that can be used to accomplish date-specific queries, as well as the Technical Guide - Selection by Date (Caslys, 2015) which outlines the query syntax..Along with the content created through this mapping project, several other GIS map layers should be used to create a comprehensive representation of the human disturbance footprint. Primarily, roads that have been previously mapped have not been re-captured under the scope of this project. Therefore, any modelling that is developed to map the human disturbance footprint should include other map layers managed by NWTCG. Refer to Section 3.1 in the Human Disturbance Mapping Report (Caslys, 2015) for a list of recommended map layers to be included in this process. As well, refer to the (NWT Cumulative Impact Monitoring Program) Inventory of Landscape Change Map Viewer to view a series of map layers that all contribute to the total development footprint. For a geometry prioritized listing of NWTCG seismic datasets see: NWTCG_SeismicData.xlsx at http://diims.pws.gov.nt.ca/gnwt/llisapi.dll/link/54154974

Buffers created on 7/1/2022 using the "WIDTH_L" and "WIDTH_R" attributes in the Military Training Routes (MTR) shapefile. Military Training Routes (MTRs) are routes used by military aircraft to maintain proficiency in tactical flying. These routes are usually established below 10,000 feet MSL for operations at speeds in excess of 250 knots. MTRs data is provided as a geospatial vector file formats. MTRs data information is published every eight weeks by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration-Aeronautical Information Services.

"The Water Supply Pipeline and Buffer layer forms part of the Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps for the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

This layer is for the purpose of the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014 only. Please contact Council on 5475 7526 or email mail@sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au for more information on the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

Notes on Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps ─ * Overlays provide a trigger for consideration of an overlay issue to be verified by further on-site investigations. * In certain circumstances pre-existing development approvals may override the operation of an overlay. * The Major Road Corridor and Buffer layer incorporates designated Transport Noise Corridors for the purposes of the Building Act 1975. * In relation to the dedicated public transport corridor (CAMCOS), the alternative alignment (i.e. the northern alignment through Caloundra South) is not the protected alignment by the State Government. "

"The High Voltage Electricity Line and Buffer - (Electricity - Distribution) layer forms part of the Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps for the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

This layer is for the purpose of the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014 only. Please contact Council on 5475 7526 or email mail@sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au for more information on the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

Notes on Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps ─ * Overlays provide a trigger for consideration of an overlay issue to be verified by further on-site investigations. * In certain circumstances pre-existing development approvals may override the operation of an overlay. * The Major Road Corridor and Buffer layer incorporates designated Transport Noise Corridors for the purposes of the Building Act 1975. * In relation to the dedicated public transport corridor (CAMCOS), the alternative alignment (i.e. the northern alignment through Caloundra South) is not the protected alignment by the State Government."

"The Gas Pipeline Corridor and Buffer layer forms part of the Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps for the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

This layer is for the purpose of the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014 only. Please contact Council on 5475 7526 or email mail@sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au for more information on the Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme 2014.

Notes on Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps ─ * Overlays provide a trigger for consideration of an overlay issue to be verified by further on-site investigations. * In certain circumstances pre-existing development approvals may override the operation of an overlay. * The Major Road Corridor and Buffer layer incorporates designated Transport Noise Corridors for the purposes of the Building Act 1975. * In relation to the dedicated public transport corridor (CAMCOS), the alternative alignment (i.e. the northern alignment through Caloundra South) is not the protected alignment by the State Government."

This dataset represents wetlands included in Vermont's Significant Wetlands Inventory. The State of Vermont protects wetlands which provide significant functions and values and also protects a buffer zone directly adjacent to significant wetlands. Wetlands in Vermont are classified as Class I, II, or III based on the significance of the functions and values they provide. Class I and Class II wetlands provide significant functions and values and are protected by the Vermont Wetland Rules. Any activity within a Class I or II wetland or buffer zone which is not exempt or considered an "allowed use" under the Vermont Wetland Rules requires a permit.Background: National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps were used by the State of Vermont, Agency of Natural resources as a means of creating this data layer in conjunction with the VSWI. The NWI and VSWI were joined by a union, to create the new 2010 Vermont Significant Wetland Inventory data layer, representing Vermont's regulatory wetlands. The VSWI prior to 2010 was created by hand digitizing nearly two-thirds of Vermont's wetlands from RF 24000 scale NWI mylars. The remainder of the state was scanned from RF 24000 or RF 25000 scale mylars. These mylars were created by transfering wetland polygon boundaries from RF 62500 scale NWI mylars to RF 24000 scale base maps.

This layer is intended to provide estimates of nonpoint sources on the subwatershed (HUC-12) level in the state of Michigan. These include estimates of livestock agriculture (such as livestock numbers and manure land-application area), lost wetland, natural riparian buffers, and the amount of land that is covered by impervious surfaces. Each nonpoint source indicator (or stressor) is given a category based on how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in the entire state (e.g. a subwatershed that is marked as "high" for impervious surfaces would have a high amount of impervious surface relative to the state median value). Land cover (NOAA, 2023), population and housing unit data (US Census Bureau, 2020), agricultural census data (USDA, 2020), Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) Water Resources Division CAFO permitting program (2025), and lost wetland (Fizzell, 2015) are summarized for each 12-digit HUC level subwatershed in Michigan. The number of hogs and cattle, and the percent of agricultural land that has manure land-applied or tiled, are estimates derived from county-based agricultural census and EGLE-WRD CAFO permitting data. The agricultural census county-level data were then distributed geographically across all agricultural land cover in that county, assuming even distribution or impact of a given stressor. EGLE-WRD CAFO permitting livestock data were evenly distributed across associated CAFO fields. Natural riparian buffer coverage is a percent of stream miles with a 30 meter natural vegetation buffer, and was created by buffering the stream hydrography layer and interesecting the buffer with forested and wetland 2023-era land cover. Field NameDescriptionHUC12Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 12 is a subwatershed identifier that is the smallest unit in the US Geological Survey's (USGS) Watershed Boundary Dataset.HUC12NameName of the subwatershedPopulationEstimationEstimated population in a subwatershed, approximation from 2020 decennial census block data.PopulationStatewideRankCategorical ranking of subwatershed population, indiciating how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan. Original data sourced from the 2020 US Census blocks.HousingUnitsEstimationEstimated number of housing units in a subwatershed, approximation from 2020 decennial census block data.HousingUnitsStatewideRankCategorical ranking of the number of housing units in a subwatershed, indicating how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan. Original data sourced from the 2020 US Census blocks.LandCoverPercentDevelopedPercentage of total subwatershed land cover that is developed summarized from the 2023 National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD)LandCoverPercentAgriculturalPercentage of total subwatershed land cover that is agricultural summarized from the 2023 National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD)LandCoverPercentWetlandPercentage of total subwatershed land cover that is wetland summarized from the 2023 National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD)LandCoverPercentForestPercentage of total subwatershed land cover that is forested, summarized from the 2023 National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD)LandCoverPercentOtherPercentage of total subwatershed land cover that is in other categories (open water, barren land, shrub/scrub, etc.) summarized from the 2023 National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD)ImperviousSurfaceRankCategorical ranking of the proportion of impervious land cover in a subwatershed, indicating how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan. Original data sourced from the 2023 C-CAP NOAA Impervious Land Cover dataset.ImperviousSurfaceAcresMeasurement (in acres) of impervious land cover in a subwatershed. Original data sourced from the 2023 C-CAP NOAA Impervious Land Cover dataset.WetlandsLostRankCategorical ranking of the proportion of pre-settlement wetlands that have been lost, or developed. This ranking indicates how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan. Original data sourced from the 2005 National Wetlands Inventory.EGLEManureApplicationAreaAcreMeasurement (in acres) of land area that has (or is eligible) for land applications of manure. Original data sourced from EGLE-WRD Combined Animal Feeding Operations permitting program as of February 25, 2025. EGLEManureApplicationAreaPerPercentage of NLCD 2023 agricultural land that has (or is permitted to have) land applications of manure according to EGLE-WRD CAFO permitting program. Original data sourced from EGLE-WRD Combined Animal Feeding Operations permitting program as of February 25, 2025. Note: This estimate only includes permitted CAFO operations.EGLEManureApplicationAreaRankCategorical ranking of the proportion of NLCD 2023 agricultural land that has (or is permitted to have) land applications of manure. This ranking indicates how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan. Original data sourced from the EGLE-WRD Combined Animal Feeding Operations permitting program as of February 25, 2025.AgCenManureApplicationAreaAcreAgricultural Census 2020 County level measurements (in acres) of land area that has had land applications of manure were summarized by subwatersheds assuming even distribution across NLCD 2023 Agricultural Land. AgricultureAcresAgricultural Area (in acres) of a subwatershed according to the 2023 NLCD.AgCenManureApplicationAreaPerPercentage of NLCD 2023 agricultural land that has (or is permitted to have) land applications of manure according the 2020 Agricultural Census.AgCeManureApplicationAreaRankCategorical ranking of the percentage of NLCD 2023 agricultural land that has (or is permitted to have) land applications of manure according the 2020 Agricultural Census. This ranking indicates how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan. TotalRiparianAreaSqMiTotal Riparian Area within subwatersheds measured using a 30 meter buffer of rivers and streams (extracted from National Hydrography Dataset- High Resolution).VegetatedRiparianAreaSqMiTotal Riparian Area within subwatersheds indicating the area of wetland and forested land cover types (2023 NLCD) within 30 meters of rivers and streams (extracted from National Hydrography Dataset- High Resolution).PercentOfVegetatedBufferPercentage of total riparian area that is vegetated (consisting of wetland and forest land cover types) within a subwatershed. VegetatedBufferRankCategorical ranking of the percentage of riparian areas that are vegetated for a subwatershed. This ranking indicates how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan.HogCountAgricultural Census 2020 County level hog counts were summarized by subwatersheds assuming even distribution across NLCD 2023 Agricultural Land.HogRankCategorical ranking of the number of Hogs in a subwatershed according the 2020 Agricultural Census. This ranking indicates how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan.CattleCountAgricultural Census 2020 County level Cattle counts were summarized by subwatersheds assuming even distribution across NLCD 2023 Agricultural Land.CattleRankCategorical ranking of the number of Cattle in a subwatershed according the 2020 Agricultural Census. This ranking indicates how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan.TileDrainAcresPercentPercentage of total agricultural land in a subwatershed that is tile-drained, assuming even distribution of tile drained acres from Agricultural Census 2020 County level data across agricultural land.TileDrainAcresAgricultural Census 2020 County level tile drain acres were summarized by subwatersheds assuming even distribution across NLCD 2023 Agricultural Land.TileDrainRankCategorical ranking of the amount of agricultural land that is tile drained. This ranking indicates how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan.SepticSystemsEstimateAndRankEstimated number of septic systems and statewide ranking indicating how the subwatershed compares with all other subwatersheds in Michigan.Learn more about Michigan's Statewide E. coli Total Maximum Daily Load. Additional questions can be directed to Chris Vandenberg at VandenbergC@Michigan.gov.

This layer contains the 23 National Priority Areas for Ecological Corridors (NPAECs) with their 30km buffer, identified by the Parks Canada’s National Program for Ecological Corridors. The NPAECs were identified based on a methodology that is multivariate, data driven, national in scale, and spatially explicit at a coarse resolution. Key methodological steps are described briefly on the Ecological Corridors Program mapping webpage (https://parks.canada.ca/nature/science/conservation/corridors-ecologiques-ecological-corridors/prioritaires-priorities).

The NPAECs are not ecological corridors. They are high priority areas across Canada identified as nationally important for connectivity conservation. NPAECs are broad areas where habitat loss and fragmentation have occurred or is imminent, and where the movement of many species across the landscape would be impacted if connectivity was lost. The priority areas can be thought of as national hot spots where ecological corridors are most needed. Supporting connectivity in these areas would have the biggest impact for sustaining biodiversity and ecological functions.

The NPAECs are large, coarsely defined geographic areas that should be displayed with blurred edges. The blurred boundary is a result of the underlying national-scale geographic and ecological data used to create the map. These data are coarse so precise linear delineation of hard edges around the priority areas was not possible, nor appropriate. NPAECs should therefore be represented with a 30km blurred buffer edge rather than a definitive boundary line. This data layer represents NPAECs with a 30km outward buffer already applied. The layer files include a symbology file that provides users with the intended visual aspect of the NPAEC.

Attribute table description:

fid: an integer field containing a unique identifier for each feature

id: an integer field containing the numerical identifier for each NPAEC (1-23) with their 30km outward buffer already applied

Name_En: A string field containing NPAEC names in English

Nom_Fr: A string field containing NPAEC names in French

Desc_En: A string field containing a concise English geographic description of NPAEC boundaries

Desc_En: A string field containing a concise French geographic description of NPAEC boundaries