3 datasets found
  1. a

    2023 Irrigated Lands for the Mountain Home Plateau: Machine Learning...

    • data-idwr.hub.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 15, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Idaho Department of Water Resources (2024). 2023 Irrigated Lands for the Mountain Home Plateau: Machine Learning Generated [Dataset]. https://data-idwr.hub.arcgis.com/documents/b5c6474cb4ae459480bb804127c4831e
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 15, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Idaho Department of Water Resources
    Description

    This raster file represents land within the Mountain Home study boundary classified as either “irrigated” with a cell value of 1 or “non-irrigated” with a cell value of 0 at a 10-meter spatial resolution. These classifications were determined at the pixel level by use of Random Forest, a supervised machine learning algorithm. Classification models often employ Random Forest due to its accuracy and efficiency at labeling large spatial datasets. To build a Random Forest model and supervise the learning process, IDWR staff create pre-labeled data, or training points, which are used by the algorithm to construct decision trees that will be later used on unseen data. Model accuracy is determined using a subset of the training points, otherwise known as a validation dataset. Several satellite-based input datasets are made available to the Random Forest model, which aid in distinguishing characteristics of irrigated lands. These characteristics allow patterns to be established by the model, e.g., high NDVI during summer months for cultivated crops, or consistently low ET for dryland areas. Mountain Home Irrigated Lands 2023 employed the following input datasets: US Geological Survey (USGS) products, including Landsat 8/9 and 10-meter 3DEP DEM, and European Space Agency (ESA) Copernicus products, including Harmonized Sentinel-2 and Global 30m Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND). For the creation of manually labeled training points, IDWR staff accessed the following datasets: NDVI derived from Landsat 8/9, Sentinel-2 CIR imagery, US Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS) Cropland Data Layer, Active Water Rights Place of Use data from IDWR, and USDA’s National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. All datasets were available for the current year of interest (2023). The published Mountain Home Irrigated Lands 2023 land classification raster was generated after four model runs, where at each iteration, IDWR staff added or removed training points to help improve results. Early model runs showed poor results in riparian areas near the Snake River, concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), and non-irrigated areas at higher elevations. These issues were resolved after several model runs in combination with post-processing masks. Masks used include Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory (FWS NWI) data. These data were amended to exclude polygons overlying irrigated areas, and to expand riparian area in specific locations. A manually created mask was primarily used to fill in areas around the Snake River that the model did not uniformly designate as irrigated. Ground-truthing and a thorough review of IDWR’s water rights database provided further insight for class assignments near the town of Mayfield. Lastly, the Majority Filter tool in ArcGIS was applied using a kernel of 8 nearest neighbors to smooth out “speckling” within irrigated fields. The masking datasets and the final iteration of training points are available on request. Information regarding Sentinel and Landsat imagery:All satellite data products used within the Random Forest model were accessed via the Google Earth Engine API. To find more information on Sentinel data used, query the Earth Engine Data Catalog https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets) using “COPERNICUS/S2_SR_HARMONIZED.” Information on Landsat datasets used can be found by querying “LANDSAT/LC08/C02/T1_L2” (for Landsat 8) and “LANDSAT/LC09/C02/T1_L2” (for Landsat 9).Each satellite product has several bands of available data. For our purposes, shortwave infrared 2 (SWIR2), blue, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and near infrared (NIR) were extracted from both Sentinel and Landsat images. These images were later interpolated to the following dates: 2023-04-15, 2023-05-15, 2023-06-14, 2023-07-14, 2023-08-13, 2023-09-12. Interpolated values were taken from up to 45 days before and after each interpolated date. April-June interpolated Landsat images, as well as the April interpolated Sentinel image, were not used in the model given the extent of cloud cover overlying irrigated area. For more information on the pre-processing of satellite data used in the Random Forest model, please reach out to IDWR at gisinfo@idwr.idaho.gov.

  2. e

    Long-term composited Enhanced Normalized Difference Impervious Surface Index...

    • portal.edirepository.org
    tiff, txt
    Updated Feb 10, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jeffrey Haight; Fábio de Albuquerque; Amy Frazier (2025). Long-term composited Enhanced Normalized Difference Impervious Surface Index (ENDISI) for the greater Phoenix, Arizona, USA, metropolitan area and the surrounding Sonoran desert derived from annual and seasonal Landsat imagery, 1998 to 2023 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/91c1353eadb9aa33ade3c0ca2b434c4c
    Explore at:
    tiff(247125670 byte), tiff(247067217 byte), tiff(245547166 byte), tiff(247252724 byte), tiff(246881482 byte), tiff(246397729 byte), tiff(248647774 byte), tiff(247746382 byte), tiff(248465987 byte), tiff(246415080 byte), tiff(247948983 byte), tiff(246197799 byte), tiff(247556768 byte), tiff(248407968 byte), tiff(247221985 byte), tiff(247632838 byte), tiff(248035016 byte), tiff(248211271 byte), txt(40552 byte), tiff(246396200 byte), tiff(245643593 byte), tiff(245556875 byte), tiff(249448004 byte), tiff(246561447 byte), tiff(248079067 byte), tiff(246714190 byte), tiff(245873110 byte)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 10, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    EDI
    Authors
    Jeffrey Haight; Fábio de Albuquerque; Amy Frazier
    Time period covered
    Dec 21, 1997 - Dec 20, 2023
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    raster_value
    Description

    This data package consists of multiple decades of Enhanced Normalized Difference Impervious Surface Index (ENDISI) raster data across the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER) study area within metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, USA, temporally aggregated by year and by four meteorological seasons (winter, spring, summer, fall). To serve as a proxy measurement of impervious surface and urbanization across years and seasons, we derived values of ENDISI – following the methods of Chen et al. 2019 – from annual and seasonal composites of 30-m resolution Landsat 5-9 Level-2 Surface Reflectance imagery. Finally, we exported images as individual GeoTIFF raster files, each with five bands corresponding values summarized annually (band 1) and seasonally (bands 2-5). All imagery retrieval and data processing were completed with Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al. 2017) and program R. A complete description of data processing methods, including the aggregation of imagery by year and season and the calculation of the spectral index, can be found in the data package metadata (see 'Methods and Protocols') and accompanying Javascript code.

    citations

  3. e

    Long-term composited Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) for...

    • portal.edirepository.org
    tiff, txt
    Updated Nov 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jeffrey Haight; Fábio de Albuquerque; Amy Frazier (2024). Long-term composited Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) for the greater Phoenix, Arizona, USA, metropolitan area and the surrounding Sonoran desert derived from annual and seasonal Landsat imagery, 1998 to 2023 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/69700b05a7bc103c2ba17b38af44b8d3
    Explore at:
    txt(40507 byte), tiff(240756828 byte), tiff(240316003 byte), tiff(254728715 byte), tiff(240200672 byte), tiff(239874058 byte), tiff(240780577 byte), tiff(240613456 byte), tiff(240452197 byte), tiff(240615068 byte), tiff(240176896 byte), tiff(241325226 byte), tiff(240858464 byte), tiff(239345271 byte), tiff(240233967 byte), tiff(240249894 byte), tiff(241119200 byte), tiff(240355069 byte), tiff(239240956 byte), tiff(240678148 byte), tiff(240814319 byte), tiff(239246636 byte), tiff(240292195 byte), tiff(241321395 byte), tiff(240766413 byte), tiff(240227935 byte), tiff(240513813 byte)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 5, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    EDI
    Authors
    Jeffrey Haight; Fábio de Albuquerque; Amy Frazier
    Time period covered
    Dec 21, 1997 - Dec 20, 2023
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    4_fall, annual, 1_winter, 2_spring, 3_summer
    Description

    Abstract

    This data package consists of multiple decades of modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) raster data across the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER) study area within metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona (USA), temporally aggregated by year and by four meteorological seasons (Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall). By providing a metric by which to reliably identify bodies of open water, these MNDWI data are intended to facilitate analyses of land-based environmental variables (e.g., urbanization, vegetation, land surface temperature) and can also be used to track long-term and seasonal change in the coarse extent of open water as a land-cover type. MNDWI was derived, following the methods of Xu (2006), from annual and seasonal composites of 30-m resolution Landsat 5-9 Level-2 Surface Reflectance imagery. All imagery retrieval and data processing were completed with Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al. 2017) and program R. A complete description of data processing methods, including the aggregation of imagery by year and season and the calculation of the spectral index, can be found in the data package metadata (see \'Methods and Protocols\') and accompanying Javascript code.

    Citations:

    • Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, et al. (2017) Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment 202:18--27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
    • Xu, H. (2006). Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(14), 3025--3033. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600589179
  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Idaho Department of Water Resources (2024). 2023 Irrigated Lands for the Mountain Home Plateau: Machine Learning Generated [Dataset]. https://data-idwr.hub.arcgis.com/documents/b5c6474cb4ae459480bb804127c4831e

2023 Irrigated Lands for the Mountain Home Plateau: Machine Learning Generated

Explore at:
Dataset updated
May 15, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Idaho Department of Water Resources
Description

This raster file represents land within the Mountain Home study boundary classified as either “irrigated” with a cell value of 1 or “non-irrigated” with a cell value of 0 at a 10-meter spatial resolution. These classifications were determined at the pixel level by use of Random Forest, a supervised machine learning algorithm. Classification models often employ Random Forest due to its accuracy and efficiency at labeling large spatial datasets. To build a Random Forest model and supervise the learning process, IDWR staff create pre-labeled data, or training points, which are used by the algorithm to construct decision trees that will be later used on unseen data. Model accuracy is determined using a subset of the training points, otherwise known as a validation dataset. Several satellite-based input datasets are made available to the Random Forest model, which aid in distinguishing characteristics of irrigated lands. These characteristics allow patterns to be established by the model, e.g., high NDVI during summer months for cultivated crops, or consistently low ET for dryland areas. Mountain Home Irrigated Lands 2023 employed the following input datasets: US Geological Survey (USGS) products, including Landsat 8/9 and 10-meter 3DEP DEM, and European Space Agency (ESA) Copernicus products, including Harmonized Sentinel-2 and Global 30m Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND). For the creation of manually labeled training points, IDWR staff accessed the following datasets: NDVI derived from Landsat 8/9, Sentinel-2 CIR imagery, US Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS) Cropland Data Layer, Active Water Rights Place of Use data from IDWR, and USDA’s National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. All datasets were available for the current year of interest (2023). The published Mountain Home Irrigated Lands 2023 land classification raster was generated after four model runs, where at each iteration, IDWR staff added or removed training points to help improve results. Early model runs showed poor results in riparian areas near the Snake River, concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), and non-irrigated areas at higher elevations. These issues were resolved after several model runs in combination with post-processing masks. Masks used include Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory (FWS NWI) data. These data were amended to exclude polygons overlying irrigated areas, and to expand riparian area in specific locations. A manually created mask was primarily used to fill in areas around the Snake River that the model did not uniformly designate as irrigated. Ground-truthing and a thorough review of IDWR’s water rights database provided further insight for class assignments near the town of Mayfield. Lastly, the Majority Filter tool in ArcGIS was applied using a kernel of 8 nearest neighbors to smooth out “speckling” within irrigated fields. The masking datasets and the final iteration of training points are available on request. Information regarding Sentinel and Landsat imagery:All satellite data products used within the Random Forest model were accessed via the Google Earth Engine API. To find more information on Sentinel data used, query the Earth Engine Data Catalog https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets) using “COPERNICUS/S2_SR_HARMONIZED.” Information on Landsat datasets used can be found by querying “LANDSAT/LC08/C02/T1_L2” (for Landsat 8) and “LANDSAT/LC09/C02/T1_L2” (for Landsat 9).Each satellite product has several bands of available data. For our purposes, shortwave infrared 2 (SWIR2), blue, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and near infrared (NIR) were extracted from both Sentinel and Landsat images. These images were later interpolated to the following dates: 2023-04-15, 2023-05-15, 2023-06-14, 2023-07-14, 2023-08-13, 2023-09-12. Interpolated values were taken from up to 45 days before and after each interpolated date. April-June interpolated Landsat images, as well as the April interpolated Sentinel image, were not used in the model given the extent of cloud cover overlying irrigated area. For more information on the pre-processing of satellite data used in the Random Forest model, please reach out to IDWR at gisinfo@idwr.idaho.gov.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu