10 datasets found
  1. Religious Populations Worldwide

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Dec 8, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Devastator (2023). Religious Populations Worldwide [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/thedevastator/religious-populations-worldwide
    Explore at:
    zip(481071 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 8, 2023
    Authors
    The Devastator
    Description

    Religious Populations Worldwide

    Religious Populations Worldwide by Year and Category

    By Throwback Thursday [source]

    About this dataset

    The dataset includes data on Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Shintoism, Baha'i Faith, Taoism, Confucianism, Jainism and various other syncretic and animist religions. For each religion or denomination category, it provides both the total population count and the percentage representation in relation to the overall population.

    Additionally, - Columns labeled with Population provide numeric values representing the total number of individuals belonging to a particular religion or denomination. - Columns labeled with Percent represent numerical values indicating the percentage of individuals belonging to a specific religion or denomination within a given population. - Columns that begin with ** indicate primary categories (e.g., Christianity), while columns that do not have this prefix refer to subcategories (e.g., Christianity - Roman Catholics).

    In addition to providing precise data about specific religions or denominations globally throughout multiple years,this dataset also records information about geographical locations by including state or country names under StateNme.

    This comprehensive dataset is valuable for researchers seeking information on global religious trends and can be used for analysis in fields such as sociology, anthropology studies cultural studies among others

    How to use the dataset

    Introduction:

    • Understanding the Columns:

    • Year: Represents the year in which the data was recorded.

    • StateNme: Represents the name of the state or country for which data is recorded.

    • Population: Represents the total population of individuals.

    • Total Religious: Represents the total percentage and population of individuals who identify as religious, regardless of specific religion.

    • Non Religious: Represents the percentage and population of individuals who identify as non-religious or atheists.

    • Identifying Specific Religions: The dataset includes columns for different religions such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. Each religion is further categorized into specific denominations or types within that religion (e.g., Roman Catholics within Christianity). You can find relevant information about these religions by focusing on specific columns related to each one.

    • Analyzing Percentages vs. Population: Some columns provide percentages while others provide actual population numbers for each category. Depending on your analysis requirement, you can choose either column type for your calculations and comparisons.

    • Accessing Historical Data: The dataset includes records from multiple years allowing you to analyze trends in religious populations over time. You can filter data based on specific years using Excel filters or programming languages like Python.

    • Filtering Data by State/Country: If you are interested in understanding religious populations in a particular state or country, use filters to focus on that region's data only.

    Example - Extracting Information:

    Let's say you want to analyze Hinduism's growth globally from 2000 onwards:

    • Identify Relevant Columns:
    • Year: to filter data from 2000 onwards.
    • Hindu - Total (Percent): to analyze the percentage of individuals identifying as Hindus globally.

    • Filter Data:

    • Set a filter on the Year column and select values greater than or equal to 2000.

    • Look for rows where Hindu - Total (Percent) has values.

    • Analyze Results: You can now visualize and calculate the growth of Hinduism worldwide after filtering out irrelevant data. Use statistical methods or graphical representations like line charts to understand trends over time.

    Conclusion: This guide has provided you with an overview of how to use the Rel

    Research Ideas

    • Comparing religious populations across different countries: With data available for different states and countries, this dataset allows for comparisons of religious populations across regions. Researchers can analyze how different religions are distributed geographically and compare their percentages or total populations across various locations.
    • Studying the impact of historical events on religious demographics: Since the dataset includes records categorized by year, it can be used to study how historical events such as wars, migration, or political changes have influenced religious demographics over time. By comparing population numbers before and after specific events, resea...
  2. Global Religious Demographics

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Dec 19, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Devastator (2023). Global Religious Demographics [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/thedevastator/global-religious-demographics
    Explore at:
    zip(481071 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 19, 2023
    Authors
    The Devastator
    Description

    Global Religious Demographics

    Global religious demographics over time

    By Throwback Thursday [source]

    About this dataset

    The dataset contains information on a wide range of religions, including Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Shintoism, Baha'i Faith, Taoism, Confucianism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism, Syncretic Religions (religious practices that blend elements from multiple faiths), Animism (belief in spiritual beings in nature), Non-Religious individuals or those without any religious affiliation.

    For each religion and region/country combination recorded in the dataset we have the following information:

    • Total population: The total population of the region or country.
    • Religious affiliation percentages: The percentages of the population that identify with specific religious affiliations.
    • Subgroup populations/percentages: The populations or percentages within specific denominations or sects of each religion.

    The dataset also provides additional variables like Year and State Name (for regional data) for further analysis.

    How to use the dataset

    • Understanding the Columns

      The dataset contains several columns with different categories of information. Here's a brief explanation of some important columns:

      • Year: The year in which the data was recorded.
      • Total Population: The total population of a country or region.
      • State Name (StateNme): The name of the state or region.

      Each religion has specific columns associated with it, such as Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, Judaism, Taoism, Shintoism etc., representing its percentage and population for each category/denomination within that religion.

    • Selecting Specific Data

      If you are interested in exploring data related to a particular religion or geographic location:

      • To filter data by Religion: Identify relevant columns associated with that religion such as 'Christianity', 'Buddhism', 'Islam', etc., and extract their respective percentage and population values for analysis.

        Example: If you want to analyze Christianity specifically, extract columns related to Christianity like 'Christianity (Percent)', 'Christianity (Population)', etc.

        Note: There might be multiple columns related to a specific religion indicating different categories or denominations within that religion.

      • To filter data by Geographic Location: Utilize the 'State Name' column ('StateNme') to segregate data corresponding to different states/regions.

        Example: If you want to analyze religious demographics for a particular state/region like California or India:

        i) Filter out rows where State Name is equal to California or India.

        ii) Extract relevant columns associated with your selected religion as mentioned above.

    • Finding Trends and Insights

      Once you have selected the specific data you are interested in, examine patterns and trends over time or across different regions.

      • Plotting data using visualizations: Use graphical tools such as line charts, bar charts, or pie charts to visualize how religious demographics have changed over the years or vary across different regions.

      • Analyzing population proportions: By comparing the percentage values of different religions for a given region or over time, you can gather insights into changes in religious diversity.

    • Comparing Religions

      If you wish to compare multiple religions:

    Research Ideas

    • Comparing religious affiliations across different countries or regions: With data on various religions such as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism, etc., researchers can compare the religious affiliations of different countries or regions. This can help in understanding the cultural and religious diversity within different parts of the world.
    • Exploring the growth or decline of specific religions: By examining population numbers for specific religions such as Jainism, Taoism, Zoroastrianism, etc., this dataset can be used to investigate the growth or decline of these religious groups over time. Researchers can analyze factors contributing to their popularity or decline in particular regions or countries

    Acknowledgements

    If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

    License

    See the dataset description for more information.

    Columns

    File: ThrowbackDataThursday 201912 - Religion.csv | Column name...

  3. Hate Speech and Bias against Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latines, and Muslims: A...

    • zenodo.org
    csv
    Updated Mar 13, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gunther Jikeli; Gunther Jikeli; Sameer Karali; Sameer Karali; Katharina Soemer; Katharina Soemer (2024). Hate Speech and Bias against Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latines, and Muslims: A Dataset for Machine Learning and Text Analytics [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10812805
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 13, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Gunther Jikeli; Gunther Jikeli; Sameer Karali; Sameer Karali; Katharina Soemer; Katharina Soemer
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism (ISCA) at Indiana University Dataset on bias against Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latines, and Muslims

    Description

    The dataset is a product of a research project at Indiana University on biased messages on Twitter against ethnic and religious minorities. We scraped all live messages with the keywords "Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latinos, and Muslims" from the Twitter archive in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

    Random samples of 600 tweets were created for each keyword and year, including retweets. The samples were annotated in subsamples of 100 tweets by undergraduate students in Professor Gunther Jikeli's class 'Researching White Supremacism and Antisemitism on Social Media' in the fall of 2022 and 2023. A total of 120 students participated in 2022. They annotated datasets from 2020 and 2021. 134 students participated in 2023. They annotated datasets from the years 2021 and 2022. The annotation was done using the Annotation Portal (Jikeli, Soemer and Karali, 2024). The updated version of our portal, AnnotHate, is now publicly available. Each subsample was annotated by an average of 5.65 students per sample in 2022 and 8.32 students per sample in 2023, with a range of three to ten and three to thirteen students, respectively. Annotation included questions about bias and calling out bias.

    Annotators used a scale from 1 to 5 on the bias scale (confident not biased, probably not biased, don't know, probably biased, confident biased), using definitions of bias against each ethnic or religious group that can be found in the research reports from 2022 and 2023. If the annotators interpreted a message as biased according to the definition, they were instructed to choose the specific stereotype from the definition that was most applicable. Tweets that denounced bias against a minority were labeled as "calling out bias".

    The label was determined by a 75% majority vote. We classified “probably biased” and “confident biased” as biased, and “confident not biased,” “probably not biased,” and “don't know” as not biased.

    The stereotypes about the different minorities varied. About a third of all biased tweets were classified as general 'hate' towards the minority. The nature of specific stereotypes varied by group. Asians were blamed for the Covid-19 pandemic, alongside positive but harmful stereotypes about their perceived excessive privilege. Black people were associated with criminal activity and were subjected to views that portrayed them as inferior. Jews were depicted as wielding undue power and were collectively held accountable for the actions of the Israeli government. In addition, some tweets denied the Holocaust. Hispanic people/Latines faced accusations of being undocumented immigrants and "invaders," along with persistent stereotypes of them as lazy, unintelligent, or having too many children. Muslims were often collectively blamed for acts of terrorism and violence, particularly in discussions about Muslims in India.

    The annotation results from both cohorts (Class of 2022 and Class of 2023) will not be merged. They can be identified by the "cohort" column. While both cohorts (Class of 2022 and Class of 2023) annotated the same data from 2021,* their annotation results differ. The class of 2022 identified more tweets as biased for the keywords "Asians, Latinos, and Muslims" than the class of 2023, but nearly all of the tweets identified by the class of 2023 were also identified as biased by the class of 2022. The percentage of biased tweets with the keyword 'Blacks' remained nearly the same.

    *Due to a sampling error for the keyword "Jews" in 2021, the data are not identical between the two cohorts. The 2022 cohort annotated two samples for the keyword Jews, one from 2020 and the other from 2021, while the 2023 cohort annotated samples from 2021 and 2022.The 2021 sample for the keyword "Jews" that the 2022 cohort annotated was not representative. It has only 453 tweets from 2021 and 147 from the first eight months of 2022, and it includes some tweets from the query with the keyword "Israel". The 2021 sample for the keyword "Jews" that the 2023 cohort annotated was drawn proportionally for each trimester of 2021 for the keyword "Jews".

    Content

    Cohort 2022

    This dataset contains 5880 tweets that cover a wide range of topics common in conversations about Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latines, and Muslims. 357 tweets (6.1 %) are labeled as biased and 5523 (93.9 %) are labeled as not biased. 1365 tweets (23.2 %) are labeled as calling out or denouncing bias.

    1180 out of 5880 tweets (20.1 %) contain the keyword "Asians," 590 were posted in 2020 and 590 in 2021. 39 tweets (3.3 %) are biased against Asian people. 370 tweets (31,4 %) call out bias against Asians.

    1160 out of 5880 tweets (19.7%) contain the keyword "Blacks," 578 were posted in 2020 and 582 in 2021. 101 tweets (8.7 %) are biased against Black people. 334 tweets (28.8 %) call out bias against Blacks.

    1189 out of 5880 tweets (20.2 %) contain the keyword "Jews," 592 were posted in 2020, 451 in 2021, and ––as mentioned above––146 tweets from 2022. 83 tweets (7 %) are biased against Jewish people. 220 tweets (18.5 %) call out bias against Jews.

    1169 out of 5880 tweets (19.9 %) contain the keyword "Latinos," 584 were posted in 2020 and 585 in 2021. 29 tweets (2.5 %) are biased against Latines. 181 tweets (15.5 %) call out bias against Latines.

    1182 out of 5880 tweets (20.1 %) contain the keyword "Muslims," 593 were posted in 2020 and 589 in 2021. 105 tweets (8.9 %) are biased against Muslims. 260 tweets (22 %) call out bias against Muslims.

    Cohort 2023

    The dataset contains 5363 tweets with the keywords “Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latinos and Muslims” from 2021 and 2022. 261 tweets (4.9 %) are labeled as biased, and 5102 tweets (95.1 %) were labeled as not biased. 975 tweets (18.1 %) were labeled as calling out or denouncing bias.

    1068 out of 5363 tweets (19.9 %) contain the keyword "Asians," 559 were posted in 2021 and 509 in 2022. 42 tweets (3.9 %) are biased against Asian people. 280 tweets (26.2 %) call out bias against Asians.

    1130 out of 5363 tweets (21.1 %) contain the keyword "Blacks," 586 were posted in 2021 and 544 in 2022. 76 tweets (6.7 %) are biased against Black people. 146 tweets (12.9 %) call out bias against Blacks.

    971 out of 5363 tweets (18.1 %) contain the keyword "Jews," 460 were posted in 2021 and 511 in 2022. 49 tweets (5 %) are biased against Jewish people. 201 tweets (20.7 %) call out bias against Jews.

    1072 out of 5363 tweets (19.9 %) contain the keyword "Latinos," 583 were posted in 2021 and 489 in 2022. 32 tweets (2.9 %) are biased against Latines. 108 tweets (10.1 %) call out bias against Latines.

    1122 out of 5363 tweets (20.9 %) contain the keyword "Muslims," 576 were posted in 2021 and 546 in 2022. 62 tweets (5.5 %) are biased against Muslims. 240 tweets (21.3 %) call out bias against Muslims.

    File Description

    The dataset is provided in a csv file format, with each row representing a single message, including replies, quotes, and retweets. The file contains the following columns:

    'TweetID': Represents the tweet ID.

    'Username': Represents the username who published the tweet (if it is a retweet, it will be the user who retweetet the original tweet.

    'Text': Represents the full text of the tweet (not pre-processed).

    'CreateDate': Represents the date the tweet was created.

    'Biased': Represents the labeled by our annotators if the tweet is biased (1) or not (0).

    'Calling_Out': Represents the label by our annotators if the tweet is calling out bias against minority groups (1) or not (0).

    'Keyword': Represents the keyword that was used in the query. The keyword can be in the text, including mentioned names, or the username.

    ‘Cohort’: Represents the year the data was annotated (class of 2022 or class of 2023)

    Acknowledgements

    We are grateful for the technical collaboration with Indiana University's Observatory on Social Media (OSoMe). We thank all class participants for the annotations and contributions, including Kate Baba, Eleni Ballis, Garrett Banuelos, Savannah Benjamin, Luke Bianco, Zoe Bogan, Elisha S. Breton, Aidan Calderaro, Anaye Caldron, Olivia Cozzi, Daj Crisler, Jenna Eidson, Ella Fanning, Victoria Ford, Jess Gruettner, Ronan Hancock, Isabel Hawes, Brennan Hensler, Kyra Horton, Maxwell Idczak, Sanjana Iyer, Jacob Joffe, Katie Johnson, Allison Jones, Kassidy Keltner, Sophia Knoll, Jillian Kolesky, Emily Lowrey, Rachael Morara, Benjamin Nadolne, Rachel Neglia, Seungmin Oh, Kirsten Pecsenye, Sophia Perkovich, Joey Philpott, Katelin

  4. The Genetics of Bene Israel from India Reveals Both Substantial Jewish and...

    • plos.figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yedael Y. Waldman; Arjun Biddanda; Natalie R. Davidson; Paul Billing-Ross; Maya Dubrovsky; Christopher L. Campbell; Carole Oddoux; Eitan Friedman; Gil Atzmon; Eran Halperin; Harry Ostrer; Alon Keinan (2023). The Genetics of Bene Israel from India Reveals Both Substantial Jewish and Indian Ancestry [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152056
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Yedael Y. Waldman; Arjun Biddanda; Natalie R. Davidson; Paul Billing-Ross; Maya Dubrovsky; Christopher L. Campbell; Carole Oddoux; Eitan Friedman; Gil Atzmon; Eran Halperin; Harry Ostrer; Alon Keinan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Israel, India
    Description

    The Bene Israel Jewish community from West India is a unique population whose history before the 18th century remains largely unknown. Bene Israel members consider themselves as descendants of Jews, yet the identity of Jewish ancestors and their arrival time to India are unknown, with speculations on arrival time varying between the 8th century BCE and the 6th century CE. Here, we characterize the genetic history of Bene Israel by collecting and genotyping 18 Bene Israel individuals. Combining with 486 individuals from 41 other Jewish, Indian and Pakistani populations, and additional individuals from worldwide populations, we conducted comprehensive genome-wide analyses based on FST, principal component analysis, ADMIXTURE, identity-by-descent sharing, admixture linkage disequilibrium decay, haplotype sharing and allele sharing autocorrelation decay, as well as contrasted patterns between the X chromosome and the autosomes. The genetics of Bene Israel individuals resemble local Indian populations, while at the same time constituting a clearly separated and unique population in India. They are unique among Indian and Pakistani populations we analyzed in sharing considerable genetic ancestry with other Jewish populations. Putting together the results from all analyses point to Bene Israel being an admixed population with both Jewish and Indian ancestry, with the genetic contribution of each of these ancestral populations being substantial. The admixture took place in the last millennium, about 19–33 generations ago. It involved Middle-Eastern Jews and was sex-biased, with more male Jewish and local female contribution. It was followed by a population bottleneck and high endogamy, which can lead to increased prevalence of recessive diseases in this population. This study provides an example of how genetic analysis advances our knowledge of human history in cases where other disciplines lack the relevant data to do so.

  5. Z

    Hate Speech and Bias against Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latines, and Muslims: A...

    • data-staging.niaid.nih.gov
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Oct 26, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jikeli, Gunther; Karali, Sameer; Soemer, Katharina (2023). Hate Speech and Bias against Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latines, and Muslims: A Dataset for Machine Learning and Text Analytics [Dataset]. https://data-staging.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_8147307
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Indiana University Bloomington
    Authors
    Jikeli, Gunther; Karali, Sameer; Soemer, Katharina
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism (ISCA) at Indiana University Dataset on bias against Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latines, and Muslims

    The ISCA project compiled this dataset using an annotation portal, which was used to label tweets as either biased or non-biased, among other labels. Note that the annotation was done on live data, including images and context, such as threads. The original data comes from annotationportal.com. They include representative samples of live tweets from the years 2020 and 2021 with the keywords "Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latinos, and Muslims". A random sample of 600 tweets per year was drawn for each of the keywords. This includes retweets. Due to a sampling error, the sample for the year 2021 for the keyword "Jews" has only 453 tweets from 2021 and 147 from the first eight months of 2022 and it includes some tweets from the query with the keyword "Israel." The tweets were divided into six samples of 100 tweets, which were then annotated by three to seven students in the class "Researching White Supremacism and Antisemitism on Social Media" taught by Gunther Jikeli, Elisha S. Breton, and Seth Moller at Indiana University in the fall of 2022, see this report. Annotators used a scale from 1 to 5 (confident not biased, probably not biased, don't know, probably biased, confident biased). The definitions of bias against each minority group used for annotation are also included in the report. If a tweet called out or denounced bias against the minority in question, it was labeled as "calling out bias." The labels of whether a tweet is biased or calls out bias are based on a 75% majority vote. We considered "probably biased" and "confident biased" as biased and "confident not biased," "probably not biased," and "don't know" as not biased.
    The types of stereotypes vary widely across the different categories of prejudice. While about a third of all biased tweets were classified as "hate" against the minority, the stereotypes in the tweets often matched common stereotypes about the minority. Asians were blamed for the Covid pandemic. Blacks were seen as inferior and associated with crime. Jews were seen as powerful and held collectively responsible for the actions of the State of Israel. Some tweets denied the Holocaust. Hispanics/Latines were portrayed as being in the country illegally and as "invaders," in addition to stereotypical accusations of being lazy, stupid, or having too many children. Muslims, on the other hand, were often collectively blamed for terrorism and violence, though often in conversations about Muslims in India.

    Content:

    This dataset contains 5880 tweets that cover a wide range of topics common in conversations about Asians, Blacks, Jews, Latines, and Muslims. 357 tweets (6.1 %) are labeled as biased and 5523 (93.9 %) are labeled as not biased. 1365 tweets (23.2 %) are labeled as calling out or denouncing bias. 1180 out of 5880 tweets (20.1 %) contain the keyword "Asians," 590 were posted in 2020 and 590 in 2021. 39 tweets (3.3 %) are biased against Asian people. 370 tweets (31,4 %) call out bias against Asians. 1160 out of 5880 tweets (19.7%) contain the keyword "Blacks," 578 were posted in 2020 and 582 in 2021. 101 tweets (8.7 %) are biased against Black people. 334 tweets (28.8 %) call out bias against Blacks. 1189 out of 5880 tweets (20.2 %) contain the keyword "Jews," 592 were posted in 2020, 451 in 2021, and ––as mentioned above––146 tweets from 2022. 83 tweets (7 %) are biased against Jewish people. 220 tweets (18.5 %) call out bias against Jews. 1169 out of 5880 tweets (19.9 %) contain the keyword "Latinos," 584 were posted in 2020 and 585 in 2021. 29 tweets (2.5 %) are biased against Latines. 181 tweets (15.5 %) call out bias against Latines. 1182 out of 5880 tweets (20.1 %) contain the keyword "Muslims," 593 were posted in 2020 and 589 in 2021. 105 tweets (8.9 %) are biased against Muslims. 260 tweets (22 %) call out bias against Muslims.

    File Description:

    The dataset is provided in a csv file format, with each row representing a single message, including replies, quotes, and retweets. The file contains the following columns:
    'TweetID': Represents the tweet ID.
    'Username': Represents the username who published the tweet (if it is a retweet, it will be the user who retweetet the original tweet.
    'Text': Represents the full text of the tweet (not pre-processed). 'CreateDate': Represents the date the tweet was created.
    'Biased': Represents the labeled by our annotators if the tweet is biased (1) or not (0). 'Calling_Out': Represents the label by our annotators if the tweet is calling out bias against minority groups (1) or not (0). 'Keyword': Represents the keyword that was used in the query. The keyword can be in the text, including mentioned names, or the username.

    Licences

    Data is published under the terms of the "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

    Acknowledgements

    We are grateful for the technical collaboration with Indiana University's Observatory on Social Media (OSoMe). We thank all class participants for the annotations and contributions, including Kate Baba, Eleni Ballis, Garrett Banuelos, Savannah Benjamin, Luke Bianco, Zoe Bogan, Elisha S. Breton, Aidan Calderaro, Anaye Caldron, Olivia Cozzi, Daj Crisler, Jenna Eidson, Ella Fanning, Victoria Ford, Jess Gruettner, Ronan Hancock, Isabel Hawes, Brennan Hensler, Kyra Horton, Maxwell Idczak, Sanjana Iyer, Jacob Joffe, Katie Johnson, Allison Jones, Kassidy Keltner, Sophia Knoll, Jillian Kolesky, Emily Lowrey, Rachael Morara, Benjamin Nadolne, Rachel Neglia, Seungmin Oh, Kirsten Pecsenye, Sophia Perkovich, Joey Philpott, Katelin Ray, Kaleb Samuels, Chloe Sherman, Rachel Weber, Molly Winkeljohn, Ally Wolfgang, Rowan Wolke, Michael Wong, Jane Woods, Kaleb Woodworth, and Aurora Young. This work used Jetstream2 at Indiana University through allocation HUM200003 from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support (ACCESS) program, which is supported by National Science Foundation grants #2138259, #2138286, #2138307, #2137603, and #2138296.

  6. Jewish Soldiers of the Habsburg Army (1788-1820)

    • zenodo.org
    Updated Sep 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ilya Berkovich; Ilya Berkovich (2025). Jewish Soldiers of the Habsburg Army (1788-1820) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13787516
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 18, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Ilya Berkovich; Ilya Berkovich
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    With more than 1,500 individual entries, this is the inaugural instalment of my research database collated in the framework of the Project Forgotten Soldiers: Jewish Military Experience in the Habsburg Monarchy. This is an open access database, and everyone is welcome to use it according to their own scholarly and personal interests. In 1,189 cases we have official documented records confirming the soldiers were Jewish. In another 313 entries I was able to identify likely Jewish soldiers based on circumstantial evidence cross-referencing names and places of birth, with the presence of confirmed Jewish soldiers drafted into the same units as part of the same recruitment drive. This dataset further includes evidence for 156 spouses and 47 children. While military records do mentions these, their number suggests that the Habsburg army preferred to enlist unmarried men.

    The database is structured in a similar way to an official individual entry in the Habsburg military records. These were arranged in tables, with soldiers listed by seniority. Name, place and land of birth are followed by age and religion. This latter rubric allows identifying the bulk of the Jewish soldiers. Also included in the record is marital status, profession (if any), number, names and ages of children (if any), followed by a short summary text of the soldier’s service itinerary. While not always consistent in detail, these texts mention enlistment dates, transfers between units, promotions, desertions, periods as prisoner of war and military awards (if any). I have taken the material from the personal records and added several additional parameters:

    • The soldiers are entered into the database according to their date of enlistment. This is followed by a colour-coded table showing their years of service. To see the meaning of the different colours employed, scroll to the legend at the end of the dataset.
    • Following the years of service, we see the date when the soldier left service (final year in service for incomplete service records). When known, the reason the soldier left the army is given (discharge/ death/ desertion etc).
    • Then come the three most important columns within the table: service record, primary sources and units. At first glance, these columns have only a few letters and numbers, but bring your mouse courser onto the relevant field marked with red triangles. An additional window will then open:

    a. Service Record: Shows the entire service record of the soldier arranged by date. I use original German as it appears in the archival records. If you see spelling differences with modern German – they are there for a reason.

    b. Primary Sources: Provides the information on all the archival records consulted to reconstruct the service itinerary. The number in the field denotes the number of the archival cartons consulted.

    c. Units: Number of units in which a soldier serves. Bringing the cursor on to the field will open their list. Most Jewish soldiers served in the line infantry (IR) and the Military Transport Corps (MFWK or MFK). However, there were also Jewish sharpshooters, cavalrymen, gunners and even a few members of the nascent Austrian Navy.

    • The next two columns provide entries of the soldier’s conduct and medical condition, which in Habsburg military jargon was referred to rather callously as Defekten. I note the original medical diagnoses verbatim. When possible to identify, I note the modern medical term.
    • General database-wide parameters are then noted in the next part of the table. Among others, it provides information on enlistment type (conscript/ volunteer?), main branches of service (such as Infantry/ Cavalry/ Artillery), and roles within the military (such as non-commissioned officers/ drummers/ medics).
    • Concluding this part of the table are columns covering desertions, periods as prisoner of war and awards of the army cannon cross (for veterans of 1813-14) and other military awards.
    • The last column provides the original German outtake rubric as to how the soldier left service. In special cases, additional service notes are provides on the right.

    How to use this dataset

    This depends on what you are looking for. Firstly, download the dataset on to your computer via the link provided below. It is a simple Excel file which is easy to work with. If you wish to find out whether one of your ancestors served in the Habsburg army, use a simple keyword search. Please note that in our period there was no single accepted orthography meaning that some letters were used interchangeably (for instance B/P; D/T). There were also various patronymic suffices used in different parts of the monarchy (-witz in German/ -wicz in Polish/ -vits in Hungarian). Habsburg military clerks were mostly German speakers who often recorded the name phonetically. For instance, Jankel/ Jankl/ Jacob/ Jacobus all denote the same name. A Jewish teenager who identified himself as Moische when first reporting to duty, may have stayed so in the military records for decades, even if he was already a non-commissioned officer whose subordinates referred to as Herr Corporal.

    If you study the history of concrete Jewish communities, use the keyword search and the filter option to find entries in the database where this locality is mentioned. Some places like Prague and Lublin could be identified effortlessly. In other cases (and see the above point on German-speaking clerks), place names were recorded phonetically. The military authority usually stuck to official Polish names in Galicia, and Hungarian in the Lands of the Crown of St. Stephan. In reality, a Jewish recruit from Transcarpathian Ruthenia could have his place of birth recorded in Hungarian, Romanian or Rusin. When I could not identify the place in question, I marked it with italics. Do you think you identified something I could not? Excellent! Then please write me, and I will correct the entry in the next instalment of this database.

    I should stress that, currently, the database is not statistically representative. I have worked chronologically, meaning that there are disproportionally more entries for Jewish soldiers from the Turkish War, the first two Coalition Wars, and the Wars of 1805 and 1809. If you look at some of my other databases (for instance, that of the 1st Line Infantry Regiment 'Kaiser'), you will find least as many Jews who served in the wars of 1813-15. I will cover these in due course. This said, using the filter option of the Excel sheet, you can already make some individual queries. For instance, did Jewish grenadiers meet the minimal height requirement to be eligible for transfer into the elite infantry? (Hint: they did not!) If you are interested in the historical study of nutritional standards, compare the height of the soldiers with their year and place of birth. In my other project, I made calculations of the average height of Habsburg soldiers and I can already reveal that Jewish conscripts were, on average, several centimetres smaller than their non-Jewish comrades drafted in the same annual intake. Whatever stereotypes said, most Jews in the Habsburg Monarchy around 1800 were very poor and the sad fact of malnutrition as a child is reflected in their height as adults.

    I should stress that this is a cumulative database. ZENODO has an excellent feature allowing updated versions to supersede earlier files while retaining the same DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and metadata. As my research progresses, I plan to upload new versions of this database bi-annually. This includes not only adding new entries, but also expanding and correcting existing ones. It might well be that the service record of a soldier covered up to 1806 will be brought to a later date, possibly even to his discharge from the army. If you have not found whom you are looking for, or if you want to work with larger samples for your research, visit this page again in a few months’ time. And if you do use this database for scholarly research (by all means, please do), do not forget to cite it as you would cite any other item in your bibliography! If you are a museum professional and you want to employ material from your database to illustrate your exhibitions, you are welcome, but please cite this resource for others to learn. Links to this database will also be appreciated.

  7. Z

    Jewish Soldiers of the Habsburg Army (1788-1820)

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Mar 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Berkovich, Ilya (2025). Jewish Soldiers of the Habsburg Army (1788-1820) [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_13787515
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 18, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Habsburg and Balkan Studies
    Authors
    Berkovich, Ilya
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Version 2 (18 March 2025) includes a further 356 service itineraries. In addition, 41 entries from the previous version were updated or expanded. Currently the database covers a total of 1,858 Jewish soldiers, 421 wives and 83 children.

    ORIGINAL VERSION 1 (18 September 2024)

    With more than 1,500 individual entries, this is the inaugural instalment of my research database collated in the framework of the Project Forgotten Soldiers: Jewish Military Experience in the Habsburg Monarchy. This is an open access database, and everyone is welcome to use it according to their own scholarly and personal interests. In 1,189 cases we have official documented records confirming the soldiers were Jewish. In another 313 entries I was able to identify likely Jewish soldiers based on circumstantial evidence cross-referencing names and places of birth, with the presence of confirmed Jewish soldiers drafted into the same units as part of the same recruitment drive. This dataset further includes evidence for 156 spouses and 47 children. While military records do mentions these, their number suggests that the Habsburg army preferred to enlist unmarried men.

    The database is structured in a similar way to an official individual entry in the Habsburg military records. These were arranged in tables, with soldiers listed by seniority. Name, place and land of birth are followed by age and religion. This latter rubric allows identifying the bulk of the Jewish soldiers. Also included in the record is marital status, profession (if any), number, names and ages of children (if any), followed by a short summary text of the soldier’s service itinerary. While not always consistent in detail, these texts mention enlistment dates, transfers between units, promotions, desertions, periods as prisoner of war and military awards (if any). I have taken the material from the personal records and added several additional parameters:

    The soldiers are entered into the database according to their date of enlistment. This is followed by a colour-coded table showing their years of service. To see the meaning of the different colours employed, scroll to the legend at the end of the dataset.

    Following the years of service, we see the date when the soldier left service (final year in service for incomplete service records). When known, the reason the soldier left the army is given (discharge/ death/ desertion etc).

    Then come the three most important columns within the table: service record, primary sources and units. At first glance, these columns have only a few letters and numbers, but bring your mouse courser onto the relevant field marked with red triangles. An additional window will then open:

    a. Service Record: Shows the entire service record of the soldier arranged by date. I use original German as it appears in the archival records. If you see spelling differences with modern German – they are there for a reason.

    b. Primary Sources: Provides the information on all the archival records consulted to reconstruct the service itinerary. The number in the field denotes the number of the archival cartons consulted.

    c. Units: Number of units in which a soldier serves. Bringing the cursor on to the field will open their list. Most Jewish soldiers served in the line infantry (IR) and the Military Transport Corps (MFWK or MFK). However, there were also Jewish sharpshooters, cavalrymen, gunners and even a few members of the nascent Austrian Navy.

    The next two columns provide entries of the soldier’s conduct and medical condition, which in Habsburg military jargon was referred to rather callously as Defekten. I note the original medical diagnoses verbatim. When possible to identify, I note the modern medical term.

    General database-wide parameters are then noted in the next part of the table. Among others, it provides information on enlistment type (conscript/ volunteer?), main branches of service (such as Infantry/ Cavalry/ Artillery), and roles within the military (such as non-commissioned officers/ drummers/ medics).

    Concluding this part of the table are columns covering desertions, periods as prisoner of war and awards of the army cannon cross (for veterans of 1813-14) and other military awards.

    The last column provides the original German outtake rubric as to how the soldier left service. In special cases, additional service notes are provides on the right.

    How to use this dataset

    This depends on what you are looking for. Firstly, download the dataset on to your computer via the link provided below. It is a simple Excel file which is easy to work with. If you wish to find out whether one of your ancestors served in the Habsburg army, use a simple keyword search. Please note that in our period there was no single accepted orthography meaning that some letters were used interchangeably (for instance B/P; D/T). There were also various patronymic suffices used in different parts of the monarchy (-witz in German/ -wicz in Polish/ -vits in Hungarian). Habsburg military clerks were mostly German speakers who often recorded the name phonetically. For instance, Jankel/ Jankl/ Jacob/ Jacobus all denote the same name. A Jewish teenager who identified himself as Moische when first reporting to duty, may have stayed so in the military records for decades, even if he was already a non-commissioned officer whose subordinates referred to as Herr Corporal.

    If you study the history of concrete Jewish communities, use the keyword search and the filter option to find entries in the database where this locality is mentioned. Some places like Prague and Lublin could be identified effortlessly. In other cases (and see the above point on German-speaking clerks), place names were recorded phonetically. The military authority usually stuck to official Polish names in Galicia, and Hungarian in the Lands of the Crown of St. Stephan. In reality, a Jewish recruit from Transcarpathian Ruthenia could have his place of birth recorded in Hungarian, Romanian or Rusin. When I could not identify the place in question, I marked it with italics. Do you think you identified something I could not? Excellent! Then please write me, and I will correct the entry in the next instalment of this database.

    I should stress that, currently, the database is not statistically representative. I have worked chronologically, meaning that there are disproportionally more entries for Jewish soldiers from the Turkish War, the first two Coalition Wars, and the Wars of 1805 and 1809. If you look at some of my other databases (for instance, that of the 1st Line Infantry Regiment 'Kaiser'), you will find least as many Jews who served in the wars of 1813-15. I will cover these in due course. This said, using the filter option of the Excel sheet, you can already make some individual queries. For instance, did Jewish grenadiers meet the minimal height requirement to be eligible for transfer into the elite infantry? (Hint: they did not!) If you are interested in the historical study of nutritional standards, compare the height of the soldiers with their year and place of birth. In my other project, I made calculations of the average height of Habsburg soldiers and I can already reveal that Jewish conscripts were, on average, several centimetres smaller than their non-Jewish comrades drafted in the same annual intake. Whatever stereotypes said, most Jews in the Habsburg Monarchy around 1800 were very poor and the sad fact of malnutrition as a child is reflected in their height as adults.

    I should stress that this is a cumulative database. ZENODO has an excellent feature allowing updated versions to supersede earlier files while retaining the same DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and metadata. As my research progresses, I plan to upload new versions of this database bi-annually. This includes not only adding new entries, but also expanding and correcting existing ones. It might well be that the service record of a soldier covered up to 1806 will be brought to a later date, possibly even to his discharge from the army. If you have not found whom you are looking for, or if you want to work with larger samples for your research, visit this page again in a few months’ time. And if you do use this database for scholarly research (by all means, please do), do not forget to cite it as you would cite any other item in your bibliography! If you are a museum professional and you want to employ material from your database to illustrate your exhibitions, you are welcome, but please cite this resource for others to learn. Links to this database will also be appreciated.

  8. f

    Table_1_Does Ethnic Diversity Impact on Risk Perceptions, Preparedness, and...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • figshare.com
    Updated Aug 2, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Adini, Bruria; Siman-Tov, Maya; Vanderplanken, Kirsten; van Loenhout, Joris A. F.; Guha-Sapir, Debarati (2021). Table_1_Does Ethnic Diversity Impact on Risk Perceptions, Preparedness, and Management of Heat Waves?.DOCX [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000926418
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 2, 2021
    Authors
    Adini, Bruria; Siman-Tov, Maya; Vanderplanken, Kirsten; van Loenhout, Joris A. F.; Guha-Sapir, Debarati
    Description

    Detrimental health impacts of heatwaves, including excess mortality, are increasing worldwide. To assess risk perceptions, protective knowledge and behaviors concerning heatwaves in Israel, a study was initiated, comparing attitudes of majority (Jewish) and minority (Arab) populations. A quantitative survey was disseminated through an internet panel, to a representative sample of 556 individuals (79% Jews; 21% Arabs). Overall, 74% consider heatwaves a problem, 93% believe that heatwaves' frequencies will increase, 27% are very concerned about the effects of heatwaves. Higher levels of awareness to heatwaves were found among Jewish compared to Arab respondents; 90 vs. 77% (respectively) could name heatwaves' symptoms (p < 0.001); 81 vs. 56% (respectively) reported knowing how to protect themselves (p < 0.001); 74 vs. 47% (respectively) reported knowing what to do when someone suffers from heat stroke (p < 0.001). Arab compared to Jewish respondents presented higher levels of concern about heatwaves' effects (3.22 vs. 3.09 respectively; t −2.25, p = 0.03), while knowledge of protective measures was higher among Jews compared to Arabs (3.67 vs. 3.56 t = 2.13 p = 0.04). A crucial component of enhancing preparedness to heatwaves is empowerment of minority as well as majority groups, to strengthen their capacity to implement protective behavior and elevate their self-belief in their individual ability and fortitude.

  9. England and Wales Census 2021 - Religion by economic activity status and...

    • statistics.ukdataservice.ac.uk
    xlsx
    Updated Mar 24, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics; National Records of Scotland; Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency; UK Data Service. (2023). England and Wales Census 2021 - Religion by economic activity status and occupation [Dataset]. https://statistics.ukdataservice.ac.uk/dataset/england-and-wales-census-2021-religion-by-economic-activity-status-and-occupation
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 24, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency
    Office for National Statisticshttp://www.ons.gov.uk/
    UK Data Servicehttps://ukdataservice.ac.uk/
    Authors
    Office for National Statistics; National Records of Scotland; Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency; UK Data Service.
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    England, Wales
    Description

    Census 2021 data on religion by economic activity status, by sex, by age, and religion by occupation, by sex, by age, England and Wales combined. This dataset provides Census 2021 estimates that classify usual residents in England and Wales by ethnic group. The estimates are as at Census Day, 21 March 2021.

    The religion people connect or identify with (their religious affiliation), whether or not they practise or have belief in it.
    This question was voluntary and the variable includes people who answered the question, including “No religion”, alongside those who chose not to answer this question.

    Total counts for some population groups may not match between published tables. This is to protect the confidentiality of individuals' data. Population counts have been rounded to the nearest 5 and any counts below 10 are suppressed, this is signified by a 'c' in the data tables.

    This dataset shows population counts for usual residents aged between 16 to 64 years old only. This is to focus on religious affiliation differences among the working age. Population counts in these tables may be different from other publications which use different age breakdowns.

    Quality notes can be found here

    Quality information about Labour Market can be found here

    The Standard Occupation Classification 2020 code used can be found here

    Religion

    The 8 ‘tickbox’ religious groups are as follows:

    • Buddhist
    • Christian
    • Hindu
    • Jewish
    • Muslim
    • No religion
    • Sikh
    • Other religion
  10. Religion by gender and age: Canada, provinces and territories

    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • open.canada.ca
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 21, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2023). Religion by gender and age: Canada, provinces and territories [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25318/9810035301-eng
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canadahttps://statcan.gc.ca/en
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    Data on religion by gender and age for the population in private households in Canada, provinces and territories.

  11. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
The Devastator (2023). Religious Populations Worldwide [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/thedevastator/religious-populations-worldwide
Organization logo

Religious Populations Worldwide

Religious Populations Worldwide by Year and Category

Explore at:
15 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
zip(481071 bytes)Available download formats
Dataset updated
Dec 8, 2023
Authors
The Devastator
Description

Religious Populations Worldwide

Religious Populations Worldwide by Year and Category

By Throwback Thursday [source]

About this dataset

The dataset includes data on Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Shintoism, Baha'i Faith, Taoism, Confucianism, Jainism and various other syncretic and animist religions. For each religion or denomination category, it provides both the total population count and the percentage representation in relation to the overall population.

Additionally, - Columns labeled with Population provide numeric values representing the total number of individuals belonging to a particular religion or denomination. - Columns labeled with Percent represent numerical values indicating the percentage of individuals belonging to a specific religion or denomination within a given population. - Columns that begin with ** indicate primary categories (e.g., Christianity), while columns that do not have this prefix refer to subcategories (e.g., Christianity - Roman Catholics).

In addition to providing precise data about specific religions or denominations globally throughout multiple years,this dataset also records information about geographical locations by including state or country names under StateNme.

This comprehensive dataset is valuable for researchers seeking information on global religious trends and can be used for analysis in fields such as sociology, anthropology studies cultural studies among others

How to use the dataset

Introduction:

  • Understanding the Columns:

  • Year: Represents the year in which the data was recorded.

  • StateNme: Represents the name of the state or country for which data is recorded.

  • Population: Represents the total population of individuals.

  • Total Religious: Represents the total percentage and population of individuals who identify as religious, regardless of specific religion.

  • Non Religious: Represents the percentage and population of individuals who identify as non-religious or atheists.

  • Identifying Specific Religions: The dataset includes columns for different religions such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc. Each religion is further categorized into specific denominations or types within that religion (e.g., Roman Catholics within Christianity). You can find relevant information about these religions by focusing on specific columns related to each one.

  • Analyzing Percentages vs. Population: Some columns provide percentages while others provide actual population numbers for each category. Depending on your analysis requirement, you can choose either column type for your calculations and comparisons.

  • Accessing Historical Data: The dataset includes records from multiple years allowing you to analyze trends in religious populations over time. You can filter data based on specific years using Excel filters or programming languages like Python.

  • Filtering Data by State/Country: If you are interested in understanding religious populations in a particular state or country, use filters to focus on that region's data only.

Example - Extracting Information:

Let's say you want to analyze Hinduism's growth globally from 2000 onwards:

  • Identify Relevant Columns:
  • Year: to filter data from 2000 onwards.
  • Hindu - Total (Percent): to analyze the percentage of individuals identifying as Hindus globally.

  • Filter Data:

  • Set a filter on the Year column and select values greater than or equal to 2000.

  • Look for rows where Hindu - Total (Percent) has values.

  • Analyze Results: You can now visualize and calculate the growth of Hinduism worldwide after filtering out irrelevant data. Use statistical methods or graphical representations like line charts to understand trends over time.

Conclusion: This guide has provided you with an overview of how to use the Rel

Research Ideas

  • Comparing religious populations across different countries: With data available for different states and countries, this dataset allows for comparisons of religious populations across regions. Researchers can analyze how different religions are distributed geographically and compare their percentages or total populations across various locations.
  • Studying the impact of historical events on religious demographics: Since the dataset includes records categorized by year, it can be used to study how historical events such as wars, migration, or political changes have influenced religious demographics over time. By comparing population numbers before and after specific events, resea...
Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu