ID 2007 Average IMD Score (Population weighted average of the combined index of multiple deprivation (IMD) scores for the SOAs in a district) Source: Communities and Local Government (CLG): ID 2007 Publisher: Neighbourhood Statistics Geographies: Local Authority District (LAD), County/Unitary Authority Geographic coverage: England Time coverage: 2007 Type of data: Administrative data (with statistical transformations applied)

ID 2004 Average IMD Score (Population weighted average of the combined index of multiple deprivation (IMD) scores for the SOAs in a district) Source: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM): ID 2004 Publisher: Communities and Local Government (CLG) Geographies: Local Authority District (LAD), County/Unitary Authority Geographic coverage: England Time coverage: 2004 Type of data: Administrative data (with statistical transformations applied)

The English Indices of Deprivation 2019 use 39 separate indicators, organised across seven distinct domains of deprivation which can be combined, using appropriate weights, to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2019 (IMD 2019).The English Indices of Deprivation 2019 use 39 separate indicators, organised across seven distinct domains of deprivation which can be combined, using appropriate weights, to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2019 (IMD 2019). This is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and is calculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA) in England. The IMD 2019 can be used to rank every LSOA in England according to their relative level of deprivation.ColumnFull ColumnLSOA01CDLSOA code (2011)LSOA01NMLSOA name (2011)LADcdLocal Authority District code (2019)LADnmLocal Authority District name (2019)IMDScoreIndex of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) ScoreIMDRank0Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IMDDec0Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)IncScoreIncome Score (rate)IncRankIncome Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IncDecIncome Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)EmpScoreEmployment Score (rate)EmpRankEmployment Rank (where 1 is most deprived)EmpDecEmployment Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)EduScoreEducation, Skills and Training ScoreEduRankEducation, Skills and Training Rank (where 1 is most deprived)EduDecEducation, Skills and Training Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)HDDScoreHealth Deprivation and Disability ScoreHDDRankHealth Deprivation and Disability Rank (where 1 is most deprived)HDDDecHealth Deprivation and Disability Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)CriScoreCrime ScoreCriRankCrime Rank (where 1 is most deprived)CriDecCrime Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)BHSScoreBarriers to Housing and Services ScoreBHSRankBarriers to Housing and Services Rank (where 1 is most deprived)BHSDecBarriers to Housing and Services Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)EnvScoreLiving Environment ScoreEnvRankLiving Environment Rank (where 1 is most deprived)EnvDecLiving Environment Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)IDCScoreIncome Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) Score (rate)IDCRankIncome Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IDCDecIncome Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)IDOScoreIncome Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOPI) Score (rate)IDORankIncome Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOPI) Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IDODecIncome Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOPI) Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)CYPScoreChildren and Young People Sub-domain ScoreCYPRankChildren and Young People Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)CYPDecChildren and Young People Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)ASScoreAdult Skills Sub-domain ScoreASRankAdult Skills Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)ASDecAdult Skills Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)GBScoreGeographical Barriers Sub-domain ScoreGBRankGeographical Barriers Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)GBDecGeographical Barriers Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)WBScoreWider Barriers Sub-domain ScoreWBRankWider Barriers Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)WBDecWider Barriers Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)IndScoreIndoors Sub-domain ScoreIndRankIndoors Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IndDecIndoors Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)OutScoreOutdoors Sub-domain ScoreOutRankOutdoors Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)OutDecOutdoors Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)TotPopTotal population: mid 2015 (excluding prisoners)DepChiDependent Children aged 0-15: mid 2015 (excluding prisoners)Pop16_59Population aged 16-59: mid 2015 (excluding prisoners)Pop60+Older population aged 60 and over: mid 2015 (excluding prisoners)WorkPopWorking age population 18-59/64: for use with Employment Deprivation Domain (excluding prisoners)

The English Indices of Deprivation 2019 use 39 separate indicators, organised across seven distinct domains of deprivation which can be combined, using appropriate weights, to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2019 (IMD 2019). This is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and is calculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA) in England. The IMD 2019 can be used to rank every LSOA in England according to their relative level of deprivation.Source: MHCLGColumnFull ColumnLSOA01CDLSOA code (2011)LSOA01NMLSOA name (2011)LADcdLocal Authority District code (2019)LADnmLocal Authority District name (2019)IMDScoreIndex of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) ScoreIMDRank0Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IMDDec0Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)IncScoreIncome Score (rate)IncRankIncome Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IncDecIncome Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)EmpScoreEmployment Score (rate)EmpRankEmployment Rank (where 1 is most deprived)EmpDecEmployment Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)EduScoreEducation, Skills and Training ScoreEduRankEducation, Skills and Training Rank (where 1 is most deprived)EduDecEducation, Skills and Training Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)HDDScoreHealth Deprivation and Disability ScoreHDDRankHealth Deprivation and Disability Rank (where 1 is most deprived)HDDDecHealth Deprivation and Disability Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)CriScoreCrime ScoreCriRankCrime Rank (where 1 is most deprived)CriDecCrime Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)BHSScoreBarriers to Housing and Services ScoreBHSRankBarriers to Housing and Services Rank (where 1 is most deprived)BHSDecBarriers to Housing and Services Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)EnvScoreLiving Environment ScoreEnvRankLiving Environment Rank (where 1 is most deprived)EnvDecLiving Environment Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)IDCScoreIncome Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) Score (rate)IDCRankIncome Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IDCDecIncome Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)IDOScoreIncome Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOPI) Score (rate)IDORankIncome Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOPI) Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IDODecIncome Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOPI) Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)CYPScoreChildren and Young People Sub-domain ScoreCYPRankChildren and Young People Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)CYPDecChildren and Young People Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)ASScoreAdult Skills Sub-domain ScoreASRankAdult Skills Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)ASDecAdult Skills Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)GBScoreGeographical Barriers Sub-domain ScoreGBRankGeographical Barriers Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)GBDecGeographical Barriers Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)WBScoreWider Barriers Sub-domain ScoreWBRankWider Barriers Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)WBDecWider Barriers Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)IndScoreIndoors Sub-domain ScoreIndRankIndoors Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)IndDecIndoors Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)OutScoreOutdoors Sub-domain ScoreOutRankOutdoors Sub-domain Rank (where 1 is most deprived)OutDecOutdoors Sub-domain Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs)TotPopTotal population: mid 2015 (excluding prisoners)DepChiDependent Children aged 0-15: mid 2015 (excluding prisoners)Pop16_59Population aged 16-59: mid 2015 (excluding prisoners)Pop60+Older population aged 60 and over: mid 2015 (excluding prisoners)WorkPopWorking age population 18-59/64: for use with Employment Deprivation Domain (excluding prisoners)

This release provides insights into self-reported health in England and Wales in 2021, broken down by age and sex. Key findings are presented at country, regional and local authority level. Additional analyses compare general health to the 2011 Census and examines the relationship between deprivation and health at a national decile (England) or quintile (Wales) level can be found here.

In 2021 and 2011, people were asked “How is your health in general?”. The response options were:

• Very good
• Good
• Fair
• Bad
• Very bad

Age specific percentage

Age-specific percentages are estimates of disability prevalence in each age group, and are used to allow comparisons between specified age groups. Further information is in the glossary.

Age-standardised percentage

Age-standardised percentages are estimates of disability prevalence in the population, across all age groups. They allow for comparison between populations over time and across geographies, as they account for differences in the population size and age structure. Further information is in the glossary.

Details on usage of Age-standardised percentage can be found here

Count

The count is the number of usual residents by general health status from very good to very bad, sex, age group and geographic breakdown. To ensure that individuals cannot be identified in the data, counts and populations have been rounded to the nearest 5, and counts under 10 have not been included..

General health

A person's assessment of the general state of their health from very good to very bad. This assessment is not based on a person's health over any specified period of time.

Index of Multiple Deprivation and Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation

National deciles and quintiles of area deprivation are created through ranking small geographical populations known as Lower layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs), based on their deprivation score from most to least deprived. They are then grouped into 10 (deciles) or 5 (quintiles) divisions based on the subsequent ranking. We have used the 2019 IMD and WIMD because this is the most up-to-date version at the time of publishing.

Population

The population is the number of usual residents of each sex, age group and geographic breakdown. To ensure that individuals cannot be identified in the data, counts and populations have been rounded to the nearest 5, and counts under 10 have not been included.

Usual resident

For Census 2021, a usual resident of the UK is anyone who, on census day, was in the UK and had stayed or intended to stay in the UK for a period of 12 months or more or had a permanent UK address and was outside the UK and intended to be outside the UK for less than 12 months.

About the indices of deprivationThe English indices of deprivation measure relative deprivation in small areas in England. The index of multiple deprivation is the most widely used of these indices.The updated index of multiple deprivation (IMD) was published by the Department of Communities and Local Government (CLG) on 30 September 2015.The IMD brings together data covering seven different aspects or ‘domains’ of deprivation into a weighted overall index for each Lower-layer Super Output Area (LSOA) in England. The scores are then used to rank the LSOAs nationally and to calculate an IMD score for each local authority area. Local authorities are then ranked by their IMD score. The IMD presents a ranking of relative deprivation between and within local authorities in England. It is not a measure of affluence in an area, nor an absolute measure of how much more or less deprived an area is compared to another.The domains used in calculating the index are: Income; Employment; Education, Skills and Training; Health Deprivation and Disability; Crime; Barriers to Housing and Services; Living Environment. There are also two supplementary domains - Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) and Income Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOPI).LSOAs are a geographical unit which has an average of 1,500 residents and 650 households. They were developed following the 2001 census, through the aggregation of smaller census output areas, to create areas with a reasonably compact shape and which were socially similar (assessed through housing type). Around one percent of LSOAs were changed following the 2011 Census in order to maintain the characteristics described above. There are now 32,844 LSOAs in England. Leicester now has 192 LSOAs.Leicester IMDLeicester is ranked 21st most deprived in IMD 2015 out of 326 local authorities, compared with 25th in the 2010 Index.Leicester is ranked within the 10% most deprived local authorities in EnglandCompared to England, Leicester has almost double the population living in the two fifths (40%) most deprived LSOA’s in the country. 76% of Leicester’s population, compared with only 40% of England’s, live in the 40% most deprived LSOAs in the country.A full report on deprivation in Leicester can be found on the Leicester City Council website here: https://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council/policies-plans-and-strategies/health-and-social-care/data-reports-information/

Data showing deprivation levels across different Birmingham Wards, using three key indices: the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI), and the Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI). These indices are integral components in understanding socio-economic conditions, enabling insights into how deprivation affects various age groups and areas.Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD): IMD is a composite measure that ranks areas based on seven domains of deprivation: income, employment, education, health, crime, housing, and living environment. It offers a broad overview of deprivation at a small-area level. This is shown as a rank from 1-69 with 1 being the most deprived.IMD 2019 Decile: Where 1 is 10% Most Deprived Nationally. This is an indication of the wards financial resilience.Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI): IDACI focuses specifically on income deprivation among children. It measures the proportion of children aged 0-15 living in income-deprived households, reflecting the impact of poverty on young people.Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI): IDAOPI targets income deprivation among the elderly. It calculates the proportion of people aged 60 and over living in income-deprived households, providing insight into how economic disadvantage affects older populations.Data is update irregularly with the next release scheduled for late 2025.Mapping tipsWhen using the build a map page you should use the Color by category map type when visualising the IMD score.A good resource for custom colours for each decile is ColorBrewer.

This dataset provides detailed information on the 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) for Birmingham, UK. The data is available at the postcode level and includes the Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA) information.Data is provided at the LSOA 2011 Census geography.The decile score ranges from 1-10 with decile 1 representing the most deprived 10% of areas while decile 10 representing the least deprived 10% of areas.The IMD rank and decile score is allocated to the LSOA and all postcodes within it at the time of creation (2019).Note that some postcodes cross over LSOA boundaries. The Office for National Statistics sets boundaries for LSOAs and allocates every postcode to one LSOA only: this is the one which contains the majority of residents in that postcode area (as at 2011 Census).

The English Indices of Deprivation 2019 provide a comprehensive measure of relative deprivation across small areas in England. The indices are divided into several domains, each capturing a different aspect of deprivation:

Income Deprivation: Measures the proportion of the population experiencing deprivation due to low income, including those receiving income-related benefits. Employment Deprivation: Captures the proportion of the working-age population excluded from the labor market due to unemployment, illness, disability, or caring responsibilities. Education, Skills, and Training Deprivation: Assesses the lack of educational attainment and skills in the local population, including adult qualifications and children's educational performance. Health Deprivation and Disability: Measures the risk of premature death and the impairment of quality of life through poor physical or mental health. Crime Deprivation: Assesses the risk of personal and material victimization, including recorded crimes for violence, burglary, theft, and criminal damage. Barriers to Housing and Services: Measures the physical and financial accessibility of housing and local services, including overcrowding, homelessness, housing affordability, and distance to key services. Living Environment Deprivation: Assesses the quality of the local environment, including housing quality, air quality, and road traffic accidents.

Additionally, there are two supplementary indices:

Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI): Focuses on children aged 0-15 living in income-deprived families. Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI): Focuses on people aged 60 and over living in income-deprived households.

These indices help identify areas with high levels of deprivation, guiding policy interventions and resource allocation to address socio-economic inequalities.

Mid-year (30 June) estimates of the usual resident population for Lower layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in England and Wales by single year of age and sex.

New Release

This file contains all the ID2010 data for London at LSOA, ward and borough level. Please take the time to read the notes which accompany the data in the file. It has sheets for the CLG published

• LSOA domains,
• sub domains,
• IDACI/IDAOPI,
• population figures,
• borough level summary measures,
• GLA calculations for wards,
• borough level IDACI/IDAOPI.

The details of the GLA calculations, analysis and maps illustrating the results can be found in

• GLA Intelligence Briefing 2011 - 06 Indices of Deprivation 2010 - A London Perspective This briefing presents a London analysis of the CLG published indices.
• GLA Intelligence Update 01-2012, Ward Level Summary Measures of the Indices of Deprivation 2010 This Update presents, for all wards in London, summary measures of the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010 corresponding to those published by CLG at borough level, as far as is practicable and appropriate, together with additional summary information which may also be useful.
• GLA Intelligence Update 02-2012, Income Deprivation Affecting Children and Older People This Update is concerned with the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) and the Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI), the two supplementary Indices that, together with the IMD make up the Indices of Deprivation 2010. It presents the results of GLA calculations that give figures for London wards and boroughs, comparable to those published by CLG for LSOAs along with maps showing the figures at all these geographical levels for London.

Ward Level Summary Measures - Excel Spreadsheet.

The ID2010 replace the Indices of Deprivation 2007 (ID2007) as the Government’s official measure of deprivation from the Department for Communities and Local Government. The Indices show London remains an area of mixed fortunes, with some wealthier areas alongside pockets of deprivation across the capital. The indices help to pinpoints those areas where there is greatest need on a number of dimensions of deprivation.

The GLA Intelligence Unit has authored a briefing presenting the key findings for London from the 2010 Indices (below).

The underlying indicators at LSOA level for the ID2010 are available in a zip file on the CLG website.

Data for previous editions of the Indices of Deprivation are available here

Each map included in the report is available to download at the link below

Map files

In July 2013, Public Health England (PHE) published IMD2010 data adjustments to align scores with 2011 LSOA boundaries. The figures have neither been quality assured nor endorsed by DCLG. The adjusted scores can be used for analytical purposes where data are required for 2011 LSOA-level geographies. The adjusted scores do not replace DCLG's official 2010 English Indices of Deprivation, which are based on 2001 LSOA boundaries.

Two sets of scores are provided: for the overall Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) and for the Income Domain. Each file contains a set of adjusted scores, with details of how the adjustments were made.

The adjusted scores have also been used to assign 2011 LSOAs to deprivation quintiles/deciles within England as a whole and also within English regions, counties, and local authorities.

Overall Index of Multiple Deprivation (2011 boundaries)

The Income Domain (2011 boundaries)

These reports provide a summary of the seven domains of deprivation for each individual ward, taken from the LSOA analysis provided by The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) as part of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2019. With additional supporting data to further the picture of deprivation within those wards. They look at the population demographics, socio-economic, criminal activity and population health of each ward to provide a more narrative picture of the issues faced at a local level.The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) released the 2019 update of the English Indices of Deprivation on 26 September 2019 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2019 This follows previous releases in 2000, 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2015.

The 2019 Indices comprise 39 indicators organised across seven domains, which are then weighted and combined to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The domains and weightings are set out below. Appendix 1 summarises the 2019 IMD model detail and sets out the very minor changes from 2015 model.

Two supplementary sub domains are also included:

• Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) • Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI)

The IMD is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and is calculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA), or neighbourhood, in England (NB the IMD is not published at ward level). Within the IMD, every neighbourhood in England is ranked according to its level of deprivation relative to that of other areas.

The average of the combined scores for each LSOA in the local authority (LA) area, weighted for population, is called the ‘Rank of average score’ and is typically used as the overall measure of deprivation. 317 LA areas are ranked in the 2019 model.

LSOA overall IMD and domains (rank and score), LSOA sub domains (rank and score), LSOA IDACI/IDAOPI, borough level IMD summary measures, borough level domain summary measures, borough level IDACI/IDAOPI, population figures, underlying indicators. GLA Intelligence reports give further information about the components of the Indices, how they are constructed and an analysis of the results for London, together with maps of the IMD, the domains and sub domains at LSOA level. The ID2019 replace the ID2015 as the Government’s official measure of deprivation from the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government. The Indices show London remains an area of mixed fortunes, with some wealthier areas alongside pockets of deprivation across the capital. Generally, London is showing less deprivation over time compared with other parts of the country, and the pockets of deprivation are becoming more dispersed. The indices help to pinpoint those areas where there is greatest need on a number of dimensions of deprivation. The ID2019 data for the whole of England are available on this MHCLG web page. For an interactive mapping tool, click here

Summary statistics from Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The spreadsheet includes borough data from 2000, 2004 and 2007.

The latest Indices of Deprivation data for 2010 can be found here.

The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 combines a number of indicators, chosen to cover a range of economic, social and housing issues, into a single deprivation score for each small area in England. This allows each area to be ranked relative to one another according to their level of deprivation.

Local Concentration is the population weighted average of the ranks of a district’s most deprived LSOAs that contain exactly 10% of the local authority district’s population.

Extent is the proportion of a local authority district’s population living in the most deprived LSOAs in the country.

Income Scale is the number of people who are Income deprived.

Employment Scale is the number of people who are Employment deprived.

Average of LSOA Ranks is the population weighted average of the combined ranks for the LSOAs in a local authority district.

These reports provide a summary of the seven domains of deprivation for each individual ward, taken from the LSOA analysis provided by The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) as part of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2019. With additional supporting data to further the picture of deprivation within those wards. They look at the population demographics, socio-economic, criminal activity and population health of each ward to provide a more narrative picture of the issues faced at a local level.The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) released the 2019 update of the English Indices of Deprivation on 26 September 2019 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2019 This follows previous releases in 2000, 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2015.

The 2019 Indices comprise 39 indicators organised across seven domains, which are then weighted and combined to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The domains and weightings are set out below. Appendix 1 summarises the 2019 IMD model detail and sets out the very minor changes from 2015 model.

Two supplementary sub domains are also included:

• Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) • Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI)

The IMD is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and is calculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA), or neighbourhood, in England (NB the IMD is not published at ward level). Within the IMD, every neighbourhood in England is ranked according to its level of deprivation relative to that of other areas.

The average of the combined scores for each LSOA in the local authority (LA) area, weighted for population, is called the ‘Rank of average score’ and is typically used as the overall measure of deprivation. 317 LA areas are ranked in the 2019 model.

The Indices of Deprivation are published nationally by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG). These are the official indicators of deprivation. As such, wherever they show deprivation in local areas they provide strong and credible evidence to support funding bids and target resources. Deprivation is measured by the Indices of Deprivation on an Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), and also in specific domains and sub-domains of deprivation (for example Income, Employment, Education and Skills, etc). Two further datasets are included within this data, for Income Deprivation affecting Children (IDACI) and Older People (IDAOPI). So as well as overall deprivation shown in the IMD, the themed deprivation domains (and sub-domains) can also be used to identify and evidence different elements of deprivation. For example, among the various deprivation issues affecting local communities in Lincolnshire, deprivation in rural access to housing and services can often stand out in the data. There are useful supporting resources to help people understand and use the Indices of Deprivation, please see the source weblink and the additional links provided. These links also provide Deprivation data summaries for Districts, NHS CCGs, Lincolnshire, and the Greater Lincolnshire LEP. Source: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG). The Indices of Deprivation are updated at four-yearly intervals (so until the next update, the data stays current and valid for use).

This page contains all the English Indices of Deprivation (ID) data for London at LSOA and borough level for the latest release (ID2019) as published by central government back to 2010. Also posted here are some ward level summary data for London for the latest release (ID2019) and from 2007.Accompanying notes are included in the files. Please take the time to read these as they explain what is included on each sheet. The London data files have sheets for the published LSOA overall IMD and domains (rank and score), LSOA sub domains (rank and score), LSOA IDACI/IDAOPI, borough level IMD summary measures, borough level domain summary measures, borough level IDACI/IDAOPI, population figures, underlying indicators. GLA Intelligence reports give further information about the components of the Indices, how they are constructed and an analysis of the results for London, together with maps of the IMD, the domains and sub domains at LSOA level. The ID2019 replace the ID2015 as the Government’s official measure of deprivation from the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government. The Indices show London remains an area of mixed fortunes, with some wealthier areas alongside pockets of deprivation across the capital. Generally, London is showing less deprivation over time compared with other parts of the country, and the pockets of deprivation are becoming more dispersed. The indices help to pinpoint those areas where there is greatest need on a number of dimensions of deprivation. The ID2019 data for the whole of England are available on this MHCLG web page. For an interactive mapping tool, click here This dataset is included in the Greater London Authority's Night Time Observatory. Click here to find out more.

Mortality from all circulatory diseases, directly age-standardised rate, persons, under 75 years, 2004-08 (pooled) per 100,000 European Standard population by local authority by local deprivation quintile. Local deprivation quintiles are calculated by ranking small areas (Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs)) within each Local Authority based on their Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 (IMD 2007) deprivation score, and then grouping the LSOAs in each Local Authority into five groups (quintiles) with approximately equal numbers of LSOAs in each. The upper local deprivation quintile (Quintile 1) corresponds with the 20% most deprived small areas within that Local Authority. The mortality rates have been directly age-standardised using the European Standard Population in order to make allowances for differences in the age structure of populations. There are inequalities in health. For example, people living in more deprived areas tend to have shorter life expectancy, and higher prevalence and mortality rates of circulatory disease. Circulatory disease accounts for nearly 40% of all deaths among persons in England every year1. Reducing inequalities in premature mortality from all cancers is a national priority, as set out in the Department of Health’s Vital Signs Operating Framework 2008/09-2010/112 and the PSA Delivery Agreement 183. However, existing indicators for premature circulatory disease mortality do not take deprivation into account. This indicator has been produced in order to quantify inequalities in circulatory disease mortality by deprivation. This indicator has been discontinued and so there will be no further updates. Legacy unique identifier: P01369

These reports provide a summary of the seven domains of deprivation for each individual ward, taken from the LSOA analysis provided by The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) as part of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2019. With additional supporting data to further the picture of deprivation within those wards. They look at the population demographics, socio-economic, criminal activity and population health of each ward to provide a more narrative picture of the issues faced at a local level.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) released the 2019 update of the English Indices of Deprivation on 26 September 2019 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2019 This follows previous releases in 2000, 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2015.

The 2019 Indices comprise 39 indicators organised across seven domains, which are then weighted and combined to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The domains and weightings are set out below. Appendix 1 summarises the 2019 IMD model detail and sets out the very minor changes from 2015 model.

Two supplementary sub domains are also included:

• Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) • Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI)

The IMD is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and is calculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA), or neighbourhood, in England (NB the IMD is not published at ward level). Within the IMD, every neighbourhood in England is ranked according to its level of deprivation relative to that of other areas.

The average of the combined scores for each LSOA in the local authority (LA) area, weighted for population, is called the ‘Rank of average score’ and is typically used as the overall measure of deprivation. 317 LA areas are ranked in the 2019 model.

These reports provide a summary of the seven domains of deprivation for each individual ward, taken from the LSOA analysis provided by The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) as part of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2019. With additional supporting data to further the picture of deprivation within those wards. They look at the population demographics, socio-economic, criminal activity and population health of each ward to provide a more narrative picture of the issues faced at a local level.The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) released the 2019 update of the English Indices of Deprivation on 26 September 2019 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2019 This follows previous releases in 2000, 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2015.

The 2019 Indices comprise 39 indicators organised across seven domains, which are then weighted and combined to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The domains and weightings are set out below. Appendix 1 summarises the 2019 IMD model detail and sets out the very minor changes from 2015 model.

Two supplementary sub domains are also included:

• Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) • Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI)

The IMD is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and is calculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA), or neighbourhood, in England (NB the IMD is not published at ward level). Within the IMD, every neighbourhood in England is ranked according to its level of deprivation relative to that of other areas.

The average of the combined scores for each LSOA in the local authority (LA) area, weighted for population, is called the ‘Rank of average score’ and is typically used as the overall measure of deprivation. 317 LA areas are ranked in the 2019 model.