In 2019, the state of California had the least affordable child care for school-aged children. The cost of care is presented as a percentage of state median income for a two-parent family. A two-parent family, living in the state, spent 19 percent of their median income for full-time care of a school-aged child in a child care center.

This dataset tracks annual overall school rank from 2012 to 2023 for Grand Rapids Child Discovery Center

The average for 2022 based on 187 countries was 25 deaths per 1000 births. The highest value was in Niger: 117 deaths per 1000 births and the lowest value was in Estonia: 2 deaths per 1000 births. The indicator is available from 1960 to 2022. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

In 2019, the state of California had the least affordable child care.The cost of care is presented as a percentage of state median income for a two-parent family. About 18 percent of the median income of a two-parent family had to be spent for full-time care for an infant in a child care center.

In 2019 Dominica was ranked number 1 in Child Immunization Coverage Against DPT close to 99 Percent of Children Aged 12-23 Months, moving from 80 in 2018.

As of 2025, the District of Columbia was ranked as the best state to have a baby in the United States, followed by Massachusetts and Maine. On the other hand, Alabama was ranked as the worst state to have a baby. The U.S. state rankings for best states to have a baby were created using ** metrics, which included key metrics like fertility clinics per capita, obstetrician-gynecologists availability, prenatal care access, and birth rates. The ** metrics were grouped under four categories — costs, healthcare, baby friendliness, and family friendliness.

The average for 2024 based on 196 countries was 25.79 percent. The highest value was in the Central African Republic: 49 percent and the lowest value was in Hong Kong: 10.51 percent. The indicator is available from 1960 to 2024. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS) and its revised version (ECERS-R) were designed as global measures of quality that assess structural and process aspects of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) programs. Despite frequent use of the ECERS/ECERS-R in research and applied settings, associations between it and child outcomes have not been systematically reviewed. The objective of this research was to evaluate the association between the ECERS/ECERS-R and children’s wellbeing. Searches of Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, websites of large datasets and reference sections of all retrieved articles were completed up to July 3, 2015. Eligible studies provided a statistical link between the ECERS/ECERS-R and child outcomes for preschool-aged children in ECEC programs. Of the 823 studies selected for full review, 73 were included in the systematic review and 16 were meta-analyzed. The combined sample across all eligible studies consisted of 33, 318 preschool-aged children. Qualitative systematic review results revealed that ECERS/ECERS-R total scores were more generally associated with positive outcomes than subscales or factors. Seventeen separate meta-analyses were conducted to assess the strength of association between the ECERS/ECERS-R and measures that assessed children’s language, math and social-emotional outcomes. Meta-analyses revealed a small number of weak effects (in the expected direction) between the ECERS/ECERS-R total score and children’s language and positive behavior outcomes. The Language-Reasoning subscale was weakly related to a language outcome. The enormous heterogeneity in how studies operationalized the ECERS/ECERS-R, the outcomes measured and statistics reported limited our ability to meta-analyze many studies. Greater consistency in study methodology is needed in this area of research. Despite these methodological challenges, the ECERS/ECERS-R does appear to capture aspects of quality that are important for children’s wellbeing; however, the strength of association is weak.

Historical Dataset of Grand Rapids Child Discovery Center is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2003-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2002-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2002-2023),American Indian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2001-2020),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2002-2021),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2002-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2002-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2012-2023),Science Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2021-2022),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2012-2023)

Child pornography is pornography that depicts one or more children. It is prohibited and considered a criminal offence in France and in most European countries. Producing and distributing child pornography content is, therefore, illegal and punishable by imprisonment. This graph shows the ranking of countries hosting child pornography content in the world in 2019. France was in ***** position on the podium since it hosted that year, ***** percent of all child pornography content.

This dataset tracks annual overall school rank from 2012 to 2023 for Cullman Child Development Center

This dataset tracks annual overall school rank from 2018 to 2023 for Children's Lab School

Conditions observed by algorithms ranking children among Clinical Oral Health Index values.

This dataset contains 69,214 records of popular baby names. It includes data on baby names registered over different years, categorised by gender and ethnicity. The dataset consists of the following columns:

• Year of Birth – The birth year of babies.
• Gender – The gender of the baby (Male/Female).
• Ethnicity – The ethnic background of the baby.
• Child's First Name – The given first name of the baby.
• Count – The number of babies given that specific name in a particular year and ethnicity.
• Rank – The popularity rank of the name within that group. The dataset provides insights into baby-naming trends over time, helping analyze how name preferences vary by ethnicity and gender. Let me know if you need further analysis!

To assist consumers purchasing child safety seats, NHTSA has rated car seats which meet Federal Safety Standards and strict crash performance standards. While all rates seats are safe, they do differ in their ease of use in the following four basic categories: Evaluation of Instructions, Evaluation of Labels, Vehicle Installation Features, Securing the Child

This statistic shows the ranking of children's favorite subjects at school in France in 2016, by gender. Nearly ** percent of girls reported mathematics as their preferred subject.

*Epilepsy, congenital cardiac disease, bronchopneumopathy (including asthma), internal prosthesis, immunodeficiency and hematological disease, or diabetes.

*as defined in the descriptive results section.

Global Children (0-17) Living with a Single Parent by Country, 2023 Discover more data with ReportLinker!

This map shows the percent of children living within poverty by county in the United States. The popup shows the breakdown of children within poverty by race, if the data is available. According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, 21% of all children live within poverty. The map uses this figure to show areas that are above or below the national average. Areas in orange represent areas that have a higher amount of children living within poverty.The data comes from the County Health Rankings 2018 layer. The report is from a collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute.According to the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps site "By ranking the health of nearly every county in the nation, the County Health Rankings help communities understand what influences how healthy residents are and how long they will live. These comparisons among counties provide context and demonstrate that where you live, and many other factors including race/ethnicity, can deeply impact your ability to live a healthy life. The Rankings not only provide this snapshot of your county’s health, but also are used to drive conversations and action to address the health challenges and gaps highlighted in these findings."Download the Excel file here: 2018 County Health Rankings