The third edition of the Surface Solar Radiation Data Set - Heliosat (SARAH-3) is a satellite-based climate data record of the solar surface irradiance (SIS), the surface direct irradiance ((direct horizontal and direct normalized, SID and DNI), the sunshine duration (SDU), the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), daylight (DAL), and the effective cloud albedo derived (CAL) from satellite-observations of the visible channels of the MVIRI and the SEVIRI instruments onboard the geostationary Meteosat satellites. SARAH-3 covers the time period 1 Jan 1983 - 31 Dec 2020 as climate data record (CDR) and is operationally extended as Interim Climate Data Record (ICDR) to the present with a latency of 5 days; the data cover the region ±65° longitude and ±65° latitude. The products are available as monthly (P1M) and daily (P1D) means, and as 30-min instantaneous data (PT30M) (sunshine duration is available as monthly and daily sum) on a regular latitude/longitude grid with a spatial resolution of 0.05° x 0.05° degrees. The data record is complemented with a comprehensive documentation of the algorithms used and the generation of the data record. Validation report and user guidance are also available.

All product are available via the CM SAF Web User Interface. The daily and monthly mean surface incoming shortwave radiation (SIS) and the daily and monthly sums of sunshine duration (SDU) are also provided via EUMETCast.

Note: the CDR coverage ends on the 31/12/2020. Dates after 31/12/2020 are covered by the ICDR.

PyPSA-Eur is an open model dataset of the European power system at the transmission network level that covers the entire ENTSO-E area. It can be built using the code provided at https://github.com/PyPSA/PyPSA-eur.

It contains alternating current lines at and above 220 kV voltage level and all high voltage direct current lines, substations, an open database of conventional power plants, time series for electrical demand and variable renewable generator availability, and geographic potentials for the expansion of wind and solar power.

Not all data dependencies are shipped with the code repository since git is not suited for handling large changing files. Instead, we provide separate data bundles and cutouts to be downloaded and extracted, as noted in the documentation.

The provided cutouts are merged spatiotemporal subsets of the European weather data from the ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis dataset and the CMSAF SARAH-3 solar surface radiation dataset for the years 1996, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2019, 2020 and 2023. They have been prepared by and are for use with the atlite tool (https://atlite.readthedocs.io/).

Solar irradiation data is taken from SARAH-3 while all other weather data is from ERA5.

ECMWF ERA5

Source: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=overview

Terms of Use: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/api/v2/terms/static/20180314_Copernicus_License_V1.1.pdf

CMSAF SARAH-3

Pfeifroth, Uwe; Kothe, Steffen; Drücke, Jaqueline; Trentmann, Jörg; Schröder, Marc; Selbach, Nathalie; Hollmann, Rainer (2023): Surface Radiation Data Set - Heliosat (SARAH) - Edition 3, Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring, DOI:10.5676/EUM_SAF_CM/SARAH/V003, https://doi.org/10.5676/EUM_SAF_CM/SARAH/V003.

Terms of Use: All intellectual property rights of the CM SAF products belong to EUMETSAT. The use of these products is granted to every interested user, free of charge. If you wish to use these products, EUMETSAT's copyright credit must be shown by displaying the words "copyright (year) EUMETSAT" on each of the products used.

This dataset tracks annual white student percentage from 2007 to 2023 for P.s. 9 Sarah Anderson vs. New York and New York City Geographic District # 3

Petition subject: Execution case Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12232969 Date of creation: 1843-09-11 Petition location: Roxbury Selected signatures:Jeremiah Dalton Jr.William H. LordSarah A. Dunning Total signatures: 33 Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 17 Female signatures: 13 Unidentified signatures: 3 Female only signatures: No Identifications of signatories: inhabitants, [females] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Manuscript Signatory column format: not column separated Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available Additional archivist notes: Isaac Leavitt Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Governor Council Files, September 22, 1843, Case of Isaac Leavitt Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.

This dataset tracks annual black student percentage from 2007 to 2023 for P.s. 9 Sarah Anderson vs. New York and New York City Geographic District # 3

Petition subject: Property Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:26855969 Date of creation: 1750-03-22 Petition location: Grafton Selected signatures:Sarah Burnee Actions taken on dates: 1750-03-30,1750-04-02 Legislative action: Received and read and granted in the Council on March 30, 1750 and sent for concurrence and received and read and concurred in the House on April 2, 1750 Total signatures: 1 Legislative action summary: Received, read, granted, sent, received, read, concurred Females of color signatures: 1 Female only signatures: Yes Identifications of signatories: an Indian of Grafton als Hassanamisco in the County of Worcester, [females of color] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Manuscript Native American tribe: Nipmuc Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library. Additional archivist notes: Hassanamisco, Sarah English, Sarah Robbins, to sell lands, sale, homestead, meadow, Indian guardians, house, buildings, cow, cattle, Spencer Phipps, Thomas Hubbard, Samuel Holbrook, John Chandler, Edward Baker, includes affidavits, certifications, [appears to have crossed out signatures of Sarah Peck, Sarah Whipple] Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 31, pages 694-695

This dataset is about book subjects. It has 3 rows and is filtered where the books is Sarah/Sara. It features 10 columns including number of authors, number of books, earliest publication date, and latest publication date.

This data publication contains average daily means for field and satellite data from 3 treated and 3 control plots from the Canopy Trimming Experiment (CTE) located near El Verde Field Station (419 meters; 18°20’ N, 65°49’ W) in the Luquillo Experimental Forest (El Yunque National Forest), Puerto Rico collected from 2003 through 2019. In spring of 2005 (CTE1) and December of 2014 (CTE2), in 0.09 hectare (ha) square plots near the El Verde Field Station the forest canopy was trimmed and the canopy debris was littered to the forest floor. The plot size and trim amounts were based on the patch disturbance after the two most recent hurricanes before 2017, both category 3 hurricanes at the location of El Verde: Hugo in September 1989, and Georges in September 1998 (Zimmerman et al. 2014). Details of the trimming and littering treatment, as well as the biotic response to the 2005 experiment have been extensively documented (Richardson et al. 2010; Shiels et al. 2014, 2015; Shiels and González 2014). The data were collected in the inner 0.04 ha quadrants of the 0.09 ha trimmed plots to minimize edge effects. There were 3 sets of control and treated plots, with each set near El Verde field station. Field data include: solar radiation, throughfall, air temperature, soil temperature, relative humidity shallow soil, volumetric water content, soil profile volumetric water content, canopy leaf saturation, litter leaf saturation, and above canopy air temperature. Satellite data include: Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) leaf area index converted into solar radiation, MODIS land surface temperature, and Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) soil volumetric water content.The Canopy Trimming Experiment in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico, is designed to study the key mechanisms behind such a forest’s response after a major hurricane, and guide how repeated hurricanes might be expected to alter such ecosystems using these key mechanisms.These data were published on 12/12/2019. Minor metadata updates made on 06/23/2023.

A collection of 3 brain maps. Each brain map is a 3D array of values representing properties of the brain at different locations.

Collection description

Despite decades of measurements, the nitrogen balance of temperate forest catchments remains poorly understood. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition often greatly exceeds streamwater nitrogen losses; the fate of the remaining nitrogen is highly uncertain. Gaseous losses of nitrogen to denitrification are especially poorly documented and are often ignored. Here, we provide isotopic evidence (δ15NNO3 and δ18ONO3) from shallow groundwater at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest indicating extensive denitrification during midsummer, when transient, perched patches of saturation developed in hillslopes, with poor hydrological connectivity to the stream, while streamwater showed no isotopic evidence of denitrification. During small rain events, precipitation directly contributed up to 34% of streamwater nitrate, which was otherwise produced by nitrification. Together, these measurements reveal the importance of denitrification in hydrologically disconnected patches of shallow groundwater during midsummer as largely overlooked control points for nitrogen loss from temperate forest catchments.

Disease status, age range and cytology results for cervical LBC samples obtained from the Scottish national HPV Archive.

This dataset is about books. It has 3 rows and is filtered where the author is Sarah Greene. It features 7 columns including author, publication date, language, and book publisher.

The Olfactory Preference Test is designed to determine whether dams will preferentially choose urine from Untreated or Saline-treated pups over urine from cocaine-treated pups. Dams are given the opportunity to choose between two alleys and the greater proportion of time spent in an alley is interpreted as a preference for that olfactory stimulus. The left and right alleys will have alternating urine types across the test days, so that if UN urine was on the left on PPD1, UN urine will be on the right on PPD3. This test is administered on Gestational Day 19, and immediately before the Retrieval Test on Post-Partum Days 1, 3, and 5. All Target Dams should have both Olfactory and Retrieval data on all days. This experiment uses the same test fixture used by the Retrieval Experiment, but in with slightly different procedures. There are two alleys and a central compartment. The DISTAL part of the alley is FARTHEST from the swab (closest to the central compartment); the PROXIMAL part of the alley is CLOSEST to the swab (and farthest from the central compartment). A female rat who has recently given birth, or will give birth, (the “Target Dam”) chooses between two cotton swabs containing traces of urine from another dam’s pups. The experiment takes place in a chamber which accommodates the target dam, and has two cups (the left and right “sides”) for the two swabs of urine. Testing Schema for Each Day Day Treatments for Experimental Rats (the “Target Dams”) Urine Treatments Cotton Swab Gestational Day 19 UN, CC, CS No urine or cotton swabs at all. This test is to measure default preference of rats 1 UN, CC UN, CC 3 UN, CC UN, CC 5 UN, CC, CS UN, CC, CS The behavior of the TD is videotaped for later coding by Sarah and/or undergraduates. A fancy computer recording setup lets the coders easily record the observed behaviors by clicking on buttons. Each behavior is independent of each other and only one behavior can occur at a time. Several TD behaviors are recorded: 1. OTHER. A behavior other than the ones listed below. 2. DISTAL LEFT ALLEY. Dam is in the part of the left alley nearest the central compartment. 3. TOUCH/PUSH LEFT. Dam touches cotton swab in left alley with forelimbs. 4. DISTAL RIGHT ALLEY. Dam is in the part of the right alley nearest the central compartment. 5. PROXIMAL LEFT ALLEY. Dam is in the part of the le ft alley nearest the cotton swab. 6. CENTER. Dam remains in the center. 7. PROXIMAL RIGHT ALLEY. Dam is in the part of the right alley nearest the cotton swab. 8. SNIFF LEFT BALL. Dam touches cotton swab in the left alley with head. 9. TOUCH/PUSH RIGHT. Dam touches cotton swab in right alley with forelimbs. 10. SNIFF RIGHT ALLEY. Dam touches cotton swab in the right alley with head. 11. BITE RIGHT BALL. This data is not kept.

The purpose of this experiment is to determine whether a dam will preferentially choose Untreated or Saline-treated pups over Cocaine-treated pups. A female rat who has recently given birth (the “Target Dam”) chooses between two groups of pups. The experiment takes place in a chamber which accommodates the target dam, and has two cups (the left and right “sides”) for the two groups of newborn rats. Each group comprises four pups: two males and two females, all from the same mother. (The Target Dam is never the Pup Dam (biological mother) on days PPD1 or PPD3, but the Target Dam can be the same as the Pup Dam on day PPD5.) The two groups always have different mothers. Thus, there are eight pups and the Target Dam in each experiment. The test day (DAY) is the post-partum day of the Target Dam and the Pup Dam. In other words, it is the number of days the Target Dam has been a mom, and the age in days of the pups. NOTE: The pups in this experiment were also used in Experiment 4, which analyzed their vocalizations. The Target Dam, having recently given birth, engages in the usual maternal behavior of herding the pups together against her body for feeding. A common behavior is for the Target Dam to grab a pup by the scruff of the neck and carry it back to the main room. The TD carries one pup at a time, but can go back for more pups. Zero to four pups from each group can be moved in this fashion. The behavior of the TD is videotaped for later coding by Sarah and/or undergraduates. A fancy computer recording setup lets the coders easily record the observed behaviors by clicking on buttons. Several TD behaviors are recorded: 1. RETRIEVE ONE PUP FROM THE LEFT CHAMBER. This button is pressed when the TD fetches a single pup. (NOTE: If that pup is the fourth pup—the last remaining pup in the chamber—the observer presses the RETRIEVE ONE PUP FROM THE RIGHT CHAMBER button instead.) 2. RETRIEVE ONE PUP FROM THE RIGHT CHAMBER. 3. RETRIEVE ALL PUPS FROM THE LEFT CHAMBER. Pressed when the TD fetches the fourth (and last) pup from the left chamber. 4. RETRIEVE ALL PUPS FROM THE RIGHT CHAMBER. 5. HEAD IN LEFT. The TD sticks her head in the enclosed left cup. The cup is shielded from view of the camera, so we can’t see how she interacts with the pups in there until she fetches one out. 6. HEAD IN RIGHT. 7. CROUCH. The TD nurses a retrieved pup or pups. 8. TOUCH. The TD touches a retrieved pup. 9. LICK. The TD licks a retrieved pup. 10. GROUP. The TD puts the pups in a group (by picking one up and moving it into the huddle). The TD can group a newly retrieved pup that has escaped, or she can re-group a previously grouped pup now straying off. When the TD retrieves a pup, she has the choice of adding the pup to the huddle of other pups (“grouping” it) or setting it down outside the huddle. 11. OTHER. Another behavior, such as walking around the cage and not interacting with the pups. Treatments. Both the Target Dam and the pups have been assigned to treatments (sometimes called exposures). While pregnant, the TD may have been exposed to Cocaine (CC), exposed to saline (CS) or left untreated (UN). Both the CC and CS treatments use syringes to deliver the medication. Nothing is done for the UN treatment. The treatments for the pups are similar, but are given not to the pups directly, but to their mother while pregnant with the litter. Different experiments are done on three days: 1. Day 1 post partum (the day of the pups’ birth). The TD chooses between pups from two other mothers (never her own pups). One group is CC and the other is always UN. (The mother of the four pups in one group was cocaine treated, and the mother of the pups in the other group was untreated.) 2. Day 3 is the same set-up as Day 1. 3. Day 5. The TD chooses between her own pups and pups from another mother. One of three set-ups is used: a. An UN TD chooses between her own pups and pups from a CC mom. b. A CS TD chooses between her own pups and pups from a CC mom. c. A CC TD chooses between her own pups and pups from a UN mom. Data was stored in Excel spreadsheets and converted to SAS format for permanent storage.

Petition subject: Support for individuals Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25455129 Date of creation: 1816-01-12 Petition location: Grafton Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Several names from a committee Selected signatures:Sarah Phillips Legislative action: Committed Total signatures: 1 Legislative action summary: Committed Females of color signatures: 1 Female only signatures: Yes Identifications of signatories: descended from one of the tribes Hassanamisco or Grafton Indians, [females of color] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Manuscript Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available Additional archivist notes: mother, Sarah Muckamug, Sarah Muckamugg, lands, small dwelling house, trustees, Indian guardians, sale, debts, medical care, clothing, wearing apparel, bedding, attested by Asa Goodell Jr. Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Resolves 1815, c.79, passed January 19, 1816 Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.

Petition subject: Striking out the word "male" wherever it occurs in the Massachusetts constitution Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11005534 Date of creation: (unknown) Petition location: Worcester Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Harrison Bliss, Worcester; committee on constitutional amendments Selected signatures:Sarah H. EarleThomas Wentworth HigginsonAnne H. SouthwickCaleb A. WallCharles A. ChaseSarah CheneySarah E. ChaseLucy ChaseSarah F. EarleEffingham L. Capron Actions taken on dates: 1855-02-15,1855-02-16 Legislative action: Received in the House on February 15, 1855 and referred to the committee on constitutional amendments and sent for concurrence and received in the Senate on February 16, 1855 and concurred Total signatures: 137 Legislative action summary: Received, referred, sent, received, concurred Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 33 Female signatures: 66 Unidentified signatures: 38 Female only signatures: No Identifications of signatories: citizens, [females], ["others"] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Manuscript Signatory column format: not column separated Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available Additional archivist notes: women's suffrage Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1855, Docket 4046 Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.

Credit report of Ms Sarah Nakawooya Kampala Kampala Central Divi Kampala Central Division Nabugabo Allen Road Nabukeera Shop F 27 3 contains unique and detailed export import market intelligence with it's phone, email, Linkedin and details of each import and export shipment like product, quantity, price, buyer, supplier names, country and date of shipment.

Petition subject: Indian guardians Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:12231538 Date of creation: 1792-05-28 Petition location: [Mashpee?] Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Several names from a committee Selected signatures:Sarah MieAbigail PocknitElizabeth AmosJames MieJames KeeterJudas MosesNoah WebquishEbenezer QuepisSamuel Richard Actions taken on dates: 1792-06-07,1792-06-08 Legislative action: Received in the Senate on June 7, 1792 and read and committed and sent for concurrence and reeived in the House on June 8, 1792 and read and concurred Total signatures: 14 Legislative action summary: Received, read, committed, sent, received, read, concurred Females of color signatures: 3 Males of color signatures: 11 Female only signatures: No Identifications of signatories: subscribers, [males of color], [females of color] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Manuscript Signatory column format: not column separated Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: additional documents available Additional archivist notes: Gideon Hawley, Reverend, Mashpee, liberty, lands, selectmen, treasurer, town charge, wood, timber, encroachments, cattle, planting, plow, poor, hay, corn, food, labor, baskets, marsh, houses, children, bond people, preach, gospel, minister, bad man, scripture, includes list of true proprietors, ["…We do not complain for nought and that we have reason enough to murmer for what can people do when they have no liberty for we are wors of then any bond slaves for when they are sick there masters by law are ablige to seport them out of there stait but when we are sick we must seport ourselves..."] Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1792, Docket 1643 Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.

Petition subject: To abolish slavery in Washington D.C. Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858016 Date of creation: (unknown) Petition location: Newton Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: Lemuel Crehore, Newton; committee on domestic slavery Selected signatures:Sarah ThompsonAbigail M. SearlesCatharine WarrenAbigail JacksonEmeline Jackson Total signatures: 91 Female signatures: 91 Female only signatures: Yes Identifications of signatories: undersigned, women, [females] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Printed Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1839, Docket 10525 Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.

Petition subject: For the removal of Edward Greeley Loring Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:11858530 Date of creation: (unknown) Petition location: Sterling Selected signatures:Sarah E. StuartSylvia A. LyndsJane E. Reed Total signatures: 57 Female signatures: 57 Female only signatures: Yes Identifications of signatories: non voters, [females], ["women"] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Printed Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Senate Unpassed 1855, Docket 18373 Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.