59 datasets found
  1. d

    Geographic Management Information System

    • datasets.ai
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Sep 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    US Agency for International Development (2024). Geographic Management Information System [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/geographic-management-information-system
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 4, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    US Agency for International Development
    Description

    The Geographic Management Information System (GeoMIS) is a FISMA Moderate minor application built using ArcGIS Server and portal, Microsoft SQL, and a web-facing front-end. The system can be accessed over the internet via https://www.usaidgiswbg.com using a web browser. GeoMIS is based on a commercial off-the-shelf product developed by Esri. Esri is creates geographic information system (GIS) software, web GIS and geodatabase management applications and is based in California. GeoMISIt is maintained by an Israeli company, Systematics (see Attachment 3) which is EsriI's agent in Israel. The mission has an annual maintenance contract with Systematics for GeoMIS. GeoMIS has 100 users from USAID staff (USA Direct Hire and Foreign Service Nationals) and 200 users from USAID contractors and grantees. The system is installed at USAID WBG office in Tel Aviv/Israel inside the computer room in the DMZ. It has no interconnections with any other system.

  2. GIS Data Object Publishing instructions

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jul 4, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Social Security Administration (2025). GIS Data Object Publishing instructions [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/gis-data-object-publishing-instructions
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 4, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Social Security Administrationhttp://ssa.gov/
    Description

    Expands the use of internal data for creating Geographic Information System (GIS) maps. SSA's Database Systems division developed a map users guide for GIS data object publishing and was made available in an internal Sharepoint site for access throughout the agency. The guide acts as the reference for publishers of GIS objects across the life-cycle in our single, central geodatabase implementation.

  3. G

    QGIS Training Tutorials: Using Spatial Data in Geographic Information...

    • ouvert.canada.ca
    • catalogue.arctic-sdi.org
    • +2more
    html
    Updated Oct 5, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada (2021). QGIS Training Tutorials: Using Spatial Data in Geographic Information Systems [Dataset]. https://ouvert.canada.ca/data/dataset/89be0c73-6f1f-40b7-b034-323cb40b8eff
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 5, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canada
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Have you ever wanted to create your own maps, or integrate and visualize spatial datasets to examine changes in trends between locations and over time? Follow along with these training tutorials on QGIS, an open source geographic information system (GIS) and learn key concepts, procedures and skills for performing common GIS tasks – such as creating maps, as well as joining, overlaying and visualizing spatial datasets. These tutorials are geared towards new GIS users. We’ll start with foundational concepts, and build towards more advanced topics throughout – demonstrating how with a few relatively easy steps you can get quite a lot out of GIS. You can then extend these skills to datasets of thematic relevance to you in addressing tasks faced in your day-to-day work.

  4. d

    Global Point of Interest (POI) Data | 230M+ Locations, 5000 Categories,...

    • datarade.ai
    .json
    Updated Sep 7, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Xverum (2024). Global Point of Interest (POI) Data | 230M+ Locations, 5000 Categories, Geographic & Location Intelligence, Regular Updates [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/global-point-of-interest-poi-data-230m-locations-5000-c-xverum
    Explore at:
    .jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Xverum LLC
    Authors
    Xverum
    Area covered
    French Polynesia, Andorra, Mauritania, Northern Mariana Islands, Antarctica, Kyrgyzstan, Vietnam, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Bahamas
    Description

    Xverum’s Point of Interest (POI) Data is a comprehensive dataset containing 230M+ verified locations across 5000 business categories. Our dataset delivers structured geographic data, business attributes, location intelligence, and mapping insights, making it an essential tool for GIS applications, market research, urban planning, and competitive analysis.

    With regular updates and continuous POI discovery, Xverum ensures accurate, up-to-date information on businesses, landmarks, retail stores, and more. Delivered in bulk to S3 Bucket and cloud storage, our dataset integrates seamlessly into mapping, geographic information systems, and analytics platforms.

    🔥 Key Features:

    Extensive POI Coverage: ✅ 230M+ Points of Interest worldwide, covering 5000 business categories. ✅ Includes retail stores, restaurants, corporate offices, landmarks, and service providers.

    Geographic & Location Intelligence Data: ✅ Latitude & longitude coordinates for mapping and navigation applications. ✅ Geographic classification, including country, state, city, and postal code. ✅ Business status tracking – Open, temporarily closed, or permanently closed.

    Continuous Discovery & Regular Updates: ✅ New POIs continuously added through discovery processes. ✅ Regular updates ensure data accuracy, reflecting new openings and closures.

    Rich Business Insights: ✅ Detailed business attributes, including company name, category, and subcategories. ✅ Contact details, including phone number and website (if available). ✅ Consumer review insights, including rating distribution and total number of reviews (additional feature). ✅ Operating hours where available.

    Ideal for Mapping & Location Analytics: ✅ Supports geospatial analysis & GIS applications. ✅ Enhances mapping & navigation solutions with structured POI data. ✅ Provides location intelligence for site selection & business expansion strategies.

    Bulk Data Delivery (NO API): ✅ Delivered in bulk via S3 Bucket or cloud storage. ✅ Available in structured format (.json) for seamless integration.

    🏆Primary Use Cases:

    Mapping & Geographic Analysis: 🔹 Power GIS platforms & navigation systems with precise POI data. 🔹 Enhance digital maps with accurate business locations & categories.

    Retail Expansion & Market Research: 🔹 Identify key business locations & competitors for market analysis. 🔹 Assess brand presence across different industries & geographies.

    Business Intelligence & Competitive Analysis: 🔹 Benchmark competitor locations & regional business density. 🔹 Analyze market trends through POI growth & closure tracking.

    Smart City & Urban Planning: 🔹 Support public infrastructure projects with accurate POI data. 🔹 Improve accessibility & zoning decisions for government & businesses.

    💡 Why Choose Xverum’s POI Data?

    • 230M+ Verified POI Records – One of the largest & most detailed location datasets available.
    • Global Coverage – POI data from 249+ countries, covering all major business sectors.
    • Regular Updates – Ensuring accurate tracking of business openings & closures.
    • Comprehensive Geographic & Business Data – Coordinates, addresses, categories, and more.
    • Bulk Dataset Delivery – S3 Bucket & cloud storage delivery for full dataset access.
    • 100% Compliant – Ethically sourced, privacy-compliant data.

    Access Xverum’s 230M+ POI dataset for mapping, geographic analysis, and location intelligence. Request a free sample or contact us to customize your dataset today!

  5. Egypt: Road Surface Data

    • data.humdata.org
    geojson, geopackage
    Updated Apr 15, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    HeiGIT (Heidelberg Institute for Geoinformation Technology) (2025). Egypt: Road Surface Data [Dataset]. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/egypt-road-surface-data
    Explore at:
    geopackage, geojsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    HeiGIThttps://heigit.org/
    License

    Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset provides detailed information on road surfaces from OpenStreetMap (OSM) data, distinguishing between paved and unpaved surfaces across the region. This information is based on road surface prediction derived from hybrid deep learning approach. For more information on Methods, refer to the paper

    Roughly 0.6438 million km of roads are mapped in OSM in this region. Based on AI-mapped estimates the share of paved and unpaved roads is approximately 0.0602 and 0.0169 (in million kms), corressponding to 9.344% and 2.6252% respectively of the total road length in the dataset region. 0.5667 million km or 88.0308% of road surface information is missing in OSM. In order to fill this gap, Mapillary derived road surface dataset provides an additional 0.0022 million km of information (corressponding to 0.3924% of total missing information on road surface)

    It is intended for use in transportation planning, infrastructure analysis, climate emissions and geographic information system (GIS) applications.

    This dataset provides comprehensive information on road and urban area features, including location, surface quality, and classification metadata. This dataset includes attributes from OpenStreetMap (OSM) data, AI predictions for road surface, and urban classifications.

    AI features:

    • pred_class: Model-predicted class for the road surface, with values "paved" or "unpaved."

    • pred_label: Binary label associated with pred_class (0 = paved, 1 = unpaved).

    • osm_surface_class: Classification of the surface type from OSM, categorized as "paved" or "unpaved."

    • combined_surface_osm_priority: Surface classification combining pred_label and surface(OSM) while prioritizing the OSM surface tag, classified as "paved" or "unpaved."

    • combined_surface_DL_priority: Surface classification combining pred_label and surface(OSM) while prioritizing DL prediction pred_label, classified as "paved" or "unpaved."

    • n_of_predictions_used: Number of predictions used for the feature length estimation.

    • predicted_length: Predicted length based on the DL model’s estimations, in meters.

    • DL_mean_timestamp: Mean timestamp of the predictions used, for comparison.

    OSM features may have these attributes(Learn what tags mean here):

    • name: Name of the feature, if available in OSM.

    • name:en: Name of the feature in English, if available in OSM.

    • name:* (in local language): Name of the feature in the local official language, where available.

    • highway: Road classification based on OSM tags (e.g., residential, motorway, footway).

    • surface: Description of the surface material of the road (e.g., asphalt, gravel, dirt).

    • smoothness: Assessment of surface smoothness (e.g., excellent, good, intermediate, bad).

    • width: Width of the road, where available.

    • lanes: Number of lanes on the road.

    • oneway: Indicates if the road is one-way (yes or no).

    • bridge: Specifies if the feature is a bridge (yes or no).

    • layer: Indicates the layer of the feature in cases where multiple features are stacked (e.g., bridges, tunnels).

    • source: Source of the data, indicating the origin or authority of specific attributes.

    Urban classification features may have these attributes:

    • continent: The continent where the data point is located (e.g., Europe, Asia).

    • country_iso_a2: The ISO Alpha-2 code representing the country (e.g., "US" for the United States).

    • urban: Binary indicator for urban areas based on the GHSU Urban Layer 2019. (0 = rural, 1 = urban)

    • urban_area: Name of the urban area or city where the data point is located.

    • osm_id: Unique identifier assigned by OpenStreetMap (OSM) to each feature.

    • osm_type: Type of OSM element (e.g., node, way, relation).

    The data originates from OpenStreetMap (OSM) and is augmented with model predictions using images downloaded from Mapillary in combination with the GHSU Global Human Settlement Urban Layer 2019 and AFRICAPOLIS2020 urban layer.

    This dataset is one of many HeiGIT exports on HDX. See the HeiGIT website for more information.

    We are looking forward to hearing about your use-case! Feel free to reach out to us and tell us about your research at communications@heigit.org – we would be happy to amplify your work.

  6. a

    Somerset County Land Use and Land Cover Dataset

    • scogis-open-data-somerset.hub.arcgis.com
    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Nov 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Somerset County GIS (2023). Somerset County Land Use and Land Cover Dataset [Dataset]. https://scogis-open-data-somerset.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/somerset-county-land-use-and-land-cover-dataset/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Somerset County GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    This data set was generated through the 2020 LU/LC update mapping effort. The 2020 update is the seventh in a series of land use mapping efforts that was begun in 1986. Revisions and additions to the initial baseline layer were done in subsequent years from imagery captured in 1995/97, 2002, 2007, 2012, 2015 and now, 2020. This present 2020 update was created by comparing the 2015 LU/LC layer from NJDEP's Geographic Information Systems (GIS) database to 2020 color infrared (CIR) imagery and delineating and coding areas of change. Work for this data set was done by Aerial Information Systems, Inc., Redlands, CA, under direction of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP), Bureau of Geographic Information System (BGIS). LU/LC changes were captured by adding new line work and attribute data for the 2020 land use directly to the base data layer. All 2015 LU/LC polygons and 2015 LU/LC coding remains in this data set, so change analysis for the period 2015-2020 can be undertaken from this one layer. The mapping was done by USGS HUC8 basins, 13 of which cover portions of New Jersey. This statewide layer is composed of the final data sets generated for each HUC8 basin. Initial QA/QC was done on each HUC8 data set as it was produced with final QA/QC and basin-to-basin edgematching done on this statewide layer. The classification system used was a modified Anderson et al., classification system. Minimum mapping unit (MMU) is 1 acre for changes to non-water and non-wetland polygons. Changes to these two categories were mapped using .25 acres as the MMU. (See entry under the Advisory section concerning additional review being done on NHD waterbody attribute coding and impervious surface estimation.) ADVISORY This data set, edition 20231120, is a statewide layer that includes updated land use/land cover data for all HUC8 basins in New Jersey. The polygon delineations and associated land use code assignments are considered the final versions for this mapping effort. Note, however, that there is continuing review being done on this layer to update several additional attributes not presently evaluated in this edition. These attributes include several from the National Hydrography Database (NHD) that are specific to the waterbodies mapped in this layer, and several attributes containing impervious surface estimates for each polygon. Evaluating the NHD codes facilitates extracting the water features mapped in this layer and using them to update the New Jersey portion of the NHD. Those NHD specific attributes are still being evaluated and may be added to a future edition of this base data set. Similarly, additional review is being done to assess the feasibility of incorporating data on impervious surface (IS) amounts generated from two independent projects, one of which was just completed by NOAA, into this base land use layer. While the NHD and IS attributes will enhance the use of this base layer in several types of analyses, this present layer can be used for doing all primary land use analyses without having those attributes evaluated. Further, evaluating these extra attributes will result in few, if any, changes to the polygon delineations and standard land use coding that are the primary features of this layer. As such, the layer is being provided in its present edition for general use. As the additional attributes are evaluated, they may be added to a future edition of this data set. The basic land use features and codes, however, as mapped in this version of the data set will serve as the base 2020 LU/LC update. As stated in this metadata record's Use Constraints section, NJDEP makes no representations of any kind, including, but not limited to, the warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use, nor are any such warranties to be implied with respect to the digital data layers furnished hereunder. NJDEP assumes no responsibility to maintain them in any manner or form. By downloading this data, user agrees to the data use constraints listed within this metadata record.The data for Somerset County data was extracted & processed from the latest dataset by the Somerset County Office of GIS Services (SCOGIS).

  7. e

    Geodatabase for the Baltimore Ecosystem Study Spatial Data

    • portal.edirepository.org
    • search.dataone.org
    application/vnd.rar
    Updated May 4, 2012
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jarlath O'Neal-Dunne; Morgan Grove (2012). Geodatabase for the Baltimore Ecosystem Study Spatial Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/377da686246f06554f7e517de596cd2b
    Explore at:
    application/vnd.rar(29574980 kilobyte)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 4, 2012
    Dataset provided by
    EDI
    Authors
    Jarlath O'Neal-Dunne; Morgan Grove
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1999 - Jun 1, 2014
    Area covered
    Description

    The establishment of a BES Multi-User Geodatabase (BES-MUG) allows for the storage, management, and distribution of geospatial data associated with the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. At present, BES data is distributed over the internet via the BES website. While having geospatial data available for download is a vast improvement over having the data housed at individual research institutions, it still suffers from some limitations. BES-MUG overcomes these limitations; improving the quality of the geospatial data available to BES researches, thereby leading to more informed decision-making.

       BES-MUG builds on Environmental Systems Research Institute's (ESRI) ArcGIS and ArcSDE technology. ESRI was selected because its geospatial software offers robust capabilities. ArcGIS is implemented agency-wide within the USDA and is the predominant geospatial software package used by collaborating institutions.
    
    
       Commercially available enterprise database packages (DB2, Oracle, SQL) provide an efficient means to store, manage, and share large datasets. However, standard database capabilities are limited with respect to geographic datasets because they lack the ability to deal with complex spatial relationships. By using ESRI's ArcSDE (Spatial Database Engine) in conjunction with database software, geospatial data can be handled much more effectively through the implementation of the Geodatabase model. Through ArcSDE and the Geodatabase model the database's capabilities are expanded, allowing for multiuser editing, intelligent feature types, and the establishment of rules and relationships. ArcSDE also allows users to connect to the database using ArcGIS software without being burdened by the intricacies of the database itself.
    
    
       For an example of how BES-MUG will help improve the quality and timeless of BES geospatial data consider a census block group layer that is in need of updating. Rather than the researcher downloading the dataset, editing it, and resubmitting to through ORS, access rules will allow the authorized user to edit the dataset over the network. Established rules will ensure that the attribute and topological integrity is maintained, so that key fields are not left blank and that the block group boundaries stay within tract boundaries. Metadata will automatically be updated showing who edited the dataset and when they did in the event any questions arise.
    
    
       Currently, a functioning prototype Multi-User Database has been developed for BES at the University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Lab, using Arc SDE and IBM's DB2 Enterprise Database as a back end architecture. This database, which is currently only accessible to those on the UVM campus network, will shortly be migrated to a Linux server where it will be accessible for database connections over the Internet. Passwords can then be handed out to all interested researchers on the project, who will be able to make a database connection through the Geographic Information Systems software interface on their desktop computer. 
    
    
       This database will include a very large number of thematic layers. Those layers are currently divided into biophysical, socio-economic and imagery categories. Biophysical includes data on topography, soils, forest cover, habitat areas, hydrology and toxics. Socio-economics includes political and administrative boundaries, transportation and infrastructure networks, property data, census data, household survey data, parks, protected areas, land use/land cover, zoning, public health and historic land use change. Imagery includes a variety of aerial and satellite imagery.
    
    
       See the readme: http://96.56.36.108/geodatabase_SAL/readme.txt
    
    
       See the file listing: http://96.56.36.108/geodatabase_SAL/diroutput.txt
    
  8. e

    Geographic Information System of the European Commission (GISCO) - full...

    • sdi.eea.europa.eu
    www:url
    Updated Jul 10, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    European Environment Agency (2018). Geographic Information System of the European Commission (GISCO) - full database, Jul. 2018 [Dataset]. https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/catalogue/srv/api/records/799f353c-d074-47c3-9783-7e246c036a1b
    Explore at:
    www:urlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 10, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    European Environment Agency
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2016 - Dec 31, 2016
    Area covered
    Earth
    Description

    GISCO (Geographic Information System of the COmmission) is responsible for meeting the European Commission's geographical information needs at three levels: the European Union, its member countries, and its regions.

    In addition to creating statistical and other thematic maps, GISCO manages a database of geographical information, and provides related services to the Commission. Its database contains core geographical data covering the whole of Europe, such as administrative boundaries, and thematic geospatial information, such as population grid data. Some data are available for download by the general public and may be used for non-commercial purposes. For further details and information about any forthcoming new or updated datasets, see http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata.

    This metadata refers to the whole content of GISCO reference database extracted in July 2018, which contains both public datasets and datasets to be used only internally by the EEA. The document GISCO-ConditionsOfUse.pdf provided with the dataset gives information on the copyrighted data sources, the mandatory acknowledgement clauses and re-dissemination rights. The license conditions for EuroGeographic datasets in GISCO are provided in a standalone document "LicenseConditions_EuroGeographics.pdf".

    The database is provided in GDB and in SQLITE, with datasets at scales from 1:60M to 1:100K, with reference years spanning until 2016. The database manual, a file with the content of the database, and a document with the naming conventions are also provided with the database. For particular datasets extracted from this database (NUTS 2016 and COUNTRIES 2016) please refer to the associated resources in the EEA SDI catalogue.

    NOTE: This metadata file is only for internal EEA purposes and in no case replaces the official metadata provided by Eurostat.

  9. m

    Geospatial Datasets for Assessing Vulnerability of Bangladesh to Climate...

    • data.mendeley.com
    • narcis.nl
    Updated Jan 12, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    MD GOLAM AZAM (2021). Geospatial Datasets for Assessing Vulnerability of Bangladesh to Climate Change and Extremes [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/cv6cyfgmcd.3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 12, 2021
    Authors
    MD GOLAM AZAM
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Bangladesh
    Description

    The present dataset provides necessary indicators of the climate change vulnerability of Bangladesh in raster form. Geospatial databases have been created in Geographic Information System (GIS) environment mainly from two types of raw data; socioeconomic data from the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) and biophysical maps from various government and non-government agencies. Socioeconomic data have been transformed into a raster database through the Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation method in GIS. On the other hand, biophysical maps have been directly recreated as GIS feature classes and eventually, the biophysical raster database has been produced. 30 socioeconomic indicators have been considered, which has been obtained from the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. All socioeconomic data were incorporated into the GIS database to generate maps. However, the units of some variables have been adopted directly from BBS, some have been normalized based on population, and some have been adopted as percentages. 12 biophysical system indicators have also been classified based on the collected information from different sources and literature. Biophysical maps are mainly classified in relative scales according to the intensity. These geospatial datasets have been analyzed to assess the spatial vulnerability of Bangladesh to climate change and extremes. The analysis has resulted in a climate change vulnerability map of Bangladesh with recognized hotspots, significant vulnerability factors, and adaptation measures to reduce the level of vulnerability.

  10. d

    District Government Land Points

    • catalog.data.gov
    • opendata.dc.gov
    • +2more
    Updated May 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office of the Chief Technology Officer (2025). District Government Land Points [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/district-government-land-points
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Office of the Chief Technology Officer
    Description

    District addresses for the District Land. The dataset contains of addresses for the District land (Owned, Operated, and Maintained), created as part of the DC Geographic Information System (DC GIS) for the D.C. Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) and participating D.C. government agencies. Databases researched by the DC Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) identified DC Agency locations and DC GIS staff geo-processed the data.

  11. d

    GSA Federal Locations

    • catalog.data.gov
    • opendata.dc.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Feb 4, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Washington, DC (2025). GSA Federal Locations [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/gsa-federal-locations
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 4, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    City of Washington, DC
    Description

    The dataset contains locations and attributes of GSA owned or leased buildings, created as part of the DC Geographic Information System (DC GIS) for the D.C. Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) and participating D.C. government agencies. A database provided by GSA identified Federal locations and DC GIS staff geo-processed the data.

  12. Iraq: Road Surface Data

    • data.humdata.org
    geojson, geopackage
    Updated Apr 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    HeiGIT (Heidelberg Institute for Geoinformation Technology) (2025). Iraq: Road Surface Data [Dataset]. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/iraq-road-surface-data
    Explore at:
    geopackage, geojsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    HeiGIThttps://heigit.org/
    License

    Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Iraq
    Description

    This dataset provides detailed information on road surfaces from OpenStreetMap (OSM) data, distinguishing between paved and unpaved surfaces across the region. This information is based on road surface prediction derived from hybrid deep learning approach. For more information on Methods, refer to the paper

    Roughly 0.2839 million km of roads are mapped in OSM in this region. Based on AI-mapped estimates the share of paved and unpaved roads is approximately 0.026 and 0.0089 (in million kms), corressponding to 9.1664% and 3.1261% respectively of the total road length in the dataset region. 0.249 million km or 87.7075% of road surface information is missing in OSM. In order to fill this gap, Mapillary derived road surface dataset provides an additional 0.0003 million km of information (corressponding to 0.1046% of total missing information on road surface)

    It is intended for use in transportation planning, infrastructure analysis, climate emissions and geographic information system (GIS) applications.

    This dataset provides comprehensive information on road and urban area features, including location, surface quality, and classification metadata. This dataset includes attributes from OpenStreetMap (OSM) data, AI predictions for road surface, and urban classifications.

    AI features:

    • pred_class: Model-predicted class for the road surface, with values "paved" or "unpaved."

    • pred_label: Binary label associated with pred_class (0 = paved, 1 = unpaved).

    • osm_surface_class: Classification of the surface type from OSM, categorized as "paved" or "unpaved."

    • combined_surface_osm_priority: Surface classification combining pred_label and surface(OSM) while prioritizing the OSM surface tag, classified as "paved" or "unpaved."

    • combined_surface_DL_priority: Surface classification combining pred_label and surface(OSM) while prioritizing DL prediction pred_label, classified as "paved" or "unpaved."

    • n_of_predictions_used: Number of predictions used for the feature length estimation.

    • predicted_length: Predicted length based on the DL model’s estimations, in meters.

    • DL_mean_timestamp: Mean timestamp of the predictions used, for comparison.

    OSM features may have these attributes(Learn what tags mean here):

    • name: Name of the feature, if available in OSM.

    • name:en: Name of the feature in English, if available in OSM.

    • name:* (in local language): Name of the feature in the local official language, where available.

    • highway: Road classification based on OSM tags (e.g., residential, motorway, footway).

    • surface: Description of the surface material of the road (e.g., asphalt, gravel, dirt).

    • smoothness: Assessment of surface smoothness (e.g., excellent, good, intermediate, bad).

    • width: Width of the road, where available.

    • lanes: Number of lanes on the road.

    • oneway: Indicates if the road is one-way (yes or no).

    • bridge: Specifies if the feature is a bridge (yes or no).

    • layer: Indicates the layer of the feature in cases where multiple features are stacked (e.g., bridges, tunnels).

    • source: Source of the data, indicating the origin or authority of specific attributes.

    Urban classification features may have these attributes:

    • continent: The continent where the data point is located (e.g., Europe, Asia).

    • country_iso_a2: The ISO Alpha-2 code representing the country (e.g., "US" for the United States).

    • urban: Binary indicator for urban areas based on the GHSU Urban Layer 2019. (0 = rural, 1 = urban)

    • urban_area: Name of the urban area or city where the data point is located.

    • osm_id: Unique identifier assigned by OpenStreetMap (OSM) to each feature.

    • osm_type: Type of OSM element (e.g., node, way, relation).

    The data originates from OpenStreetMap (OSM) and is augmented with model predictions using images downloaded from Mapillary in combination with the GHSU Global Human Settlement Urban Layer 2019 and AFRICAPOLIS2020 urban layer.

    This dataset is one of many HeiGIT exports on HDX. See the HeiGIT website for more information.

    We are looking forward to hearing about your use-case! Feel free to reach out to us and tell us about your research at communications@heigit.org – we would be happy to amplify your work.

  13. Z

    Data from: Material stock map of Austria

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    Updated Jul 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tanikawa, Hiroki (2023). Material stock map of Austria [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_4522891
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Virag, Doris
    Fishman, Tomer
    Lanau, Maud
    Kemper, Thomas
    Tanikawa, Hiroki
    Gattringer, Andreas
    Hostert, Patrick
    Haberl, Helmut
    Liu, Gang
    Plutzar, Christoph
    van der Linden, Sebastian
    Schiller, Georg
    Frantz, David
    Schug, Franz
    Gruhler, Karin
    Wiedenhofer, Dominik
    Lederer, Jakob
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Austria
    Description

    Dynamics of societal material stocks such as buildings and infrastructures and their spatial patterns drive surging resource use and emissions. Building up and maintaining stocks requires large amounts of resources; currently stock-building materials amount to almost 60% of all materials used by humanity. Buildings, infrastructures and machinery shape social practices of production and consumption, thereby creating path dependencies for future resource use. They constitute the physical basis of the spatial organization of most socio-economic activities, for example as mobility networks, urbanization and settlement patterns and various other infrastructures.

    This dataset features a detailed map of material stocks for the whole of Austria on a 10m grid based on high resolution Earth Observation data (Sentinel-1 + Sentinel-2), crowd-sourced geodata (OSM) and material intensity factors.

    Temporal extent The map is representative for ca. 2018.

    Data format Per federal state, the data come in tiles of 30x30km (see shapefile). The projection is EPSG:3035. The images are compressed GeoTiff files (.tif). There is a mosaic in GDAL Virtual format (.vrt), which can readily be opened in most Geographic Information Systems.

    The dataset features

    area and mass for different street types

    area and mass for different rail types

    area and mass for other infrastructure

    area, volume and mass for different building types

    Masses are reported as total values, and per material category.

    Units

    area in m²

    height in m

    volume in m³

    mass in t for infrastructure and buildings

    Further information For further information, please see the publication or contact Helmut Haberl (helmut.haberl@boku.ac.at). A web-visualization of this dataset is available here. Visit our website to learn more about our project MAT_STOCKS - Understanding the Role of Material Stock Patterns for the Transformation to a Sustainable Society.

    Publication Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Schug, F., Frantz, D., Virág, D., Plutzar, C., Gruhler, K., Lederer, J., Schiller, G. , Fishman, T., Lanau, M., Gattringer, A., Kemper, T., Liu, G., Tanikawa, H., van der Linden, S., Hostert, P. (accepted): High-resolution maps of material stocks in buildings and infrastructures in Austria and Germany. Environmental Science & Technology

    Funding This research was primarly funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (MAT_STOCKS, grant agreement No 741950). ML and GL acknowledge funding by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (CityWeight, 6111-00555B), ML thanks the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC; project Multi-Scale, Circular Economic Potential of Non-Residential Building Scale, EP/S029273/1), JL acknowledges funding by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF), project ESR17-067, TF acknowledges the Israel Science Foundation grant no. 2706/19.

  14. f

    Travel time to cities and ports in the year 2015

    • figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andy Nelson (2023). Travel time to cities and ports in the year 2015 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7638134.v4
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Andy Nelson
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The dataset and the validation are fully described in a Nature Scientific Data Descriptor https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-019-0265-5

    If you want to use this dataset in an interactive environment, then use this link https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/GeographerAtLarge/TravelTime/HEAD

    The following text is a summary of the information in the above Data Descriptor.

    The dataset is a suite of global travel-time accessibility indicators for the year 2015, at approximately one-kilometre spatial resolution for the entire globe. The indicators show an estimated (and validated), land-based travel time to the nearest city and nearest port for a range of city and port sizes.

    The datasets are in GeoTIFF format and are suitable for use in Geographic Information Systems and statistical packages for mapping access to cities and ports and for spatial and statistical analysis of the inequalities in access by different segments of the population.

    These maps represent a unique global representation of physical access to essential services offered by cities and ports.

    The datasets travel_time_to_cities_x.tif (where x has values from 1 to 12) The value of each pixel is the estimated travel time in minutes to the nearest urban area in 2015. There are 12 data layers based on different sets of urban areas, defined by their population in year 2015 (see PDF report).

    travel_time_to_ports_x (x ranges from 1 to 5)

    The value of each pixel is the estimated travel time to the nearest port in 2015. There are 5 data layers based on different port sizes.

    Format Raster Dataset, GeoTIFF, LZW compressed Unit Minutes

    Data type Byte (16 bit Unsigned Integer)

    No data value 65535

    Flags None

    Spatial resolution 30 arc seconds

    Spatial extent

    Upper left -180, 85

    Lower left -180, -60 Upper right 180, 85 Lower right 180, -60 Spatial Reference System (SRS) EPSG:4326 - WGS84 - Geographic Coordinate System (lat/long)

    Temporal resolution 2015

    Temporal extent Updates may follow for future years, but these are dependent on the availability of updated inputs on travel times and city locations and populations.

    Methodology Travel time to the nearest city or port was estimated using an accumulated cost function (accCost) in the gdistance R package (van Etten, 2018). This function requires two input datasets: (i) a set of locations to estimate travel time to and (ii) a transition matrix that represents the cost or time to travel across a surface.

    The set of locations were based on populated urban areas in the 2016 version of the Joint Research Centre’s Global Human Settlement Layers (GHSL) datasets (Pesaresi and Freire, 2016) that represent low density (LDC) urban clusters and high density (HDC) urban areas (https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/datasets.php). These urban areas were represented by points, spaced at 1km distance around the perimeter of each urban area.

    Marine ports were extracted from the 26th edition of the World Port Index (NGA, 2017) which contains the location and physical characteristics of approximately 3,700 major ports and terminals. Ports are represented as single points

    The transition matrix was based on the friction surface (https://map.ox.ac.uk/research-project/accessibility_to_cities) from the 2015 global accessibility map (Weiss et al, 2018).

    Code The R code used to generate the 12 travel time maps is included in the zip file that can be downloaded with these data layers. The processing zones are also available.

    Validation The underlying friction surface was validated by comparing travel times between 47,893 pairs of locations against journey times from a Google API. Our estimated journey times were generally shorter than those from the Google API. Across the tiles, the median journey time from our estimates was 88 minutes within an interquartile range of 48 to 143 minutes while the median journey time estimated by the Google API was 106 minutes within an interquartile range of 61 to 167 minutes. Across all tiles, the differences were skewed to the left and our travel time estimates were shorter than those reported by the Google API in 72% of the tiles. The median difference was −13.7 minutes within an interquartile range of −35.5 to 2.0 minutes while the absolute difference was 30 minutes or less for 60% of the tiles and 60 minutes or less for 80% of the tiles. The median percentage difference was −16.9% within an interquartile range of −30.6% to 2.7% while the absolute percentage difference was 20% or less in 43% of the tiles and 40% or less in 80% of the tiles.

    This process and results are included in the validation zip file.

    Usage Notes The accessibility layers can be visualised and analysed in many Geographic Information Systems or remote sensing software such as QGIS, GRASS, ENVI, ERDAS or ArcMap, and also by statistical and modelling packages such as R or MATLAB. They can also be used in cloud-based tools for geospatial analysis such as Google Earth Engine.

    The nine layers represent travel times to human settlements of different population ranges. Two or more layers can be combined into one layer by recording the minimum pixel value across the layers. For example, a map of travel time to the nearest settlement of 5,000 to 50,000 people could be generated by taking the minimum of the three layers that represent the travel time to settlements with populations between 5,000 and 10,000, 10,000 and 20,000 and, 20,000 and 50,000 people.

    The accessibility layers also permit user-defined hierarchies that go beyond computing the minimum pixel value across layers. A user-defined complete hierarchy can be generated when the union of all categories adds up to the global population, and the intersection of any two categories is empty. Everything else is up to the user in terms of logical consistency with the problem at hand.

    The accessibility layers are relative measures of the ease of access from a given location to the nearest target. While the validation demonstrates that they do correspond to typical journey times, they cannot be taken to represent actual travel times. Errors in the friction surface will be accumulated as part of the accumulative cost function and it is likely that locations that are further away from targets will have greater a divergence from a plausible travel time than those that are closer to the targets. Care should be taken when referring to travel time to the larger cities when the locations of interest are extremely remote, although they will still be plausible representations of relative accessibility. Furthermore, a key assumption of the model is that all journeys will use the fastest mode of transport and take the shortest path.

  15. w

    BLM National Surface Management Agency: Area Polygons, Withdrawal Area...

    • data.wu.ac.at
    esri rest
    Updated Apr 21, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Federal Geographic Data Committee (2015). BLM National Surface Management Agency: Area Polygons, Withdrawal Area Polygons, and Special Public Purpose Withdrawal Area Polygons [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/odso/data_gov/OTU3ZGVmZDMtZjdiOS00ZWVlLWE0MzMtZTYwYjU3OTQ2ZjIx
    Explore at:
    esri restAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 21, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Geographic Data Committee
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    6f545f21326b09bf1ff5c840541e9d55dc79157e
    Description

    The SMA implementation is comprised of one feature dataset, with several polygon feature classes, rather than a single feature class. SurfaceManagementAgency: The Surface Management Agency (SMA) Geographic Information System (GIS) dataset depicts Federal land for the United States and classifies this land by its active Federal surface managing agency. The SMA feature class covers the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands. A Federal SMA agency refers to a Federal agency with administrative jurisdiction over the surface of Federal lands. Jurisdiction over the land is defined when the land is either: Withdrawn by some administrative or legislative action, or Acquired or Exchanged by a Federal Agency. This layer is a dynamic assembly of spatial data layers maintained at various federal and local government offices. The GIS data contained in this dataset represents the polygon features that show the boundaries for Surface Management Agency and the surface extent of each Federal agencyâ s surface administrative jurisdiction. SMA data depicts current withdrawn areas for a particular agency and (when appropriate) includes land that was acquired or exchanged and is located outside of a withdrawal area for that agency. The SMA data do not illustrate land status ownership pattern boundaries or contain land ownership attribute details. SMA_Withdrawals: The Surface Management Agency (SMA) Withdrawals Geographic Information System (GIS) dataset includes all of the known withdrawals which transfer surface jurisdictional responsibilities to federal agencies. The SMA Withdrawls feature class covers the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands. A Federal SMA Withdrawal is defined by formal actions that set aside, withhold, or reserve Federal land by statute or administrative order for public purposes. A withdrawal creates a title encumbrance on the land. Withdrawals must accomplish one or more of the following: A. Transfer total or partial jurisdiction of Federal land between Federal agencies. B. Close (segregate) Federal land to operation of all or some of the public land laws and/or mineral laws. C. Dedicate Federal land to a specific public purpose. There are four major categories of formal withdrawals: (1) Administrative, (2) Presidential Proclamations, (3) Congressional, and (4) Federal Power Act (FPA) or Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Withdrawals. These SMA Withdrawals will include the present total extent of withdrawn areas rather than all of the individual withdrawal actions that created them over time. These data do not illustrate land status ownership pattern boundaries or contain land ownership attribute details. SPP_WithdrawalAreas: The Special Public Purpose (SPP) Withdrawals Geographic Information System (GIS) dataset includes all of the known SPP Withdrawal Areas, which limit use or access to Federal lands (e.g. Wilderness, National Monument). The Special Public Purpose Withdrawal Areas feature class covers the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands. A Federal SPP Withdrawal Area is defined by formal actions that set aside, withhold, or reserve Federal land by statute or administrative order for public purposes. A withdrawal creates a title encumbrance on the land. Withdrawals must accomplish one or more of the following: A. Transfer total or partial jurisdiction of Federal land between Federal agencies. B. Close (segregate) Federal land to operation of all or some of the public land laws and/or mineral laws. C. Dedicate Federal land to a specific public purpose. There are four major categories of formal withdrawals: (1) Administrative, (2) Presidential Proclamations, (3) Congressional, and (4) Federal Power Act (FPA) or Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Withdrawals. These SPP Withdrawals include the present total extent of withdrawn areas rather than all of the individual withdrawal actions that created them over time. These data do not illustrate land status ownership pattern boundaries or contain land ownership attribute details.

  16. d

    District Government Owned Structures

    • catalog.data.gov
    • opendata.dc.gov
    • +1more
    Updated May 21, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office of the Chief Financial Officer (2025). District Government Owned Structures [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/district-government-owned-structures
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Office of the Chief Financial Officer
    Description

    A layer showing the District of Columbia government related structures. The dataset contains polygons representing District Government related structures on Government property created as part of the DC Geographic Information System (DC GIS) for the D.C. Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) using the Department of Energy and Environment’s Unique Building Identifier (UBID) data. The tax assessment roll public extract (ITSPE) is used for assessment and property analysis, to send property tax bills and notices, and stores comprehensive tax information such as ownership, mailing addresses, non-contiguous Air Rights lots (Multifamily or Development), Air Rights lots, possessory interest lots, record lots, tax lots, parcels, condominiums, and federally owned lands such as reservations and appropriations. The linkage from the Vector Property layers to this database is SSL (Square, Suffix, and Lot). The UBID data was originally created by spatially joining the 2019 building footprints published in DC Open Data with the Common Ownership Lots. The UBIDs were coded using US DOE’s Implementation code. Search for UBID and ITSPE in Open Data DC for individual documentation.

  17. v

    National Historical Geographic Information System

    • vgin.vdem.virginia.gov
    • vgin-vgin.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 22, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Virginia Geographic Information Network (2022). National Historical Geographic Information System [Dataset]. https://vgin.vdem.virginia.gov/datasets/national-historical-geographic-information-system
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 22, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Virginia Geographic Information Network
    Description

    Direct Link to Download Page: https://data2.nhgis.org/mainDOWNLOAD U.S. CENSUS DATA TABLES & MAPPING FILESThe National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) provides easy access to summary tables and time series of population, housing, agriculture, and economic data, along with GIS-compatible boundary files, for years from 1790 through the present and for all levels of U.S. census geography, including states, counties, tracts, and blocks. Read more.WHAT IS IPUMS?IPUMS provides census and survey data from around the world integrated across time and space. IPUMS integration and documentation makes it easy to study change, conduct comparative research, merge information across data types, and analyze individuals within family and community context. Data and services are available free of charge. Learn more about IPUMS.

  18. e

    Transcultural Empire: Geographic Information System of the 1897 and 1926...

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Sep 30, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The citation is currently not available for this dataset.
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 30, 2022
    Area covered
    Russian Empire, Soviet Union
    Description

    The geographic information system (GIS) is based on the first and only Russian Imperial Census of 1897 and the First All-Union Census of the Soviet Union of 1926. The GIS features vector data (shapefiles) of allprovinces of the two states. For the 1897 census, there is information about linguistic, religious, and social estate groups. The part based on the 1926 census features nationality. Both shapefiles include information on gender, rural and urban population. The GIS allows for producing any necessary maps for individual studies of the period which require the administrative boundaries and demographic information.

  19. Vegetation - Western Riverside County - 2005 [ds170]

    • gis.data.ca.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +6more
    Updated Sep 10, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2021). Vegetation - Western Riverside County - 2005 [ds170] [Dataset]. https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/CDFW::vegetation-western-riverside-county-2005-ds170-2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 10, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) contracted with the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) and Aerial Information Systems (AIS) to produce an alliance-level, vegetation classification and map of Western Riverside County, California. The resulting classification and map products will be used to help establish a monitoring basis for the vegetation and habitats of the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The plan aims to conserve over 500,000 acres of land out of the 1.26 million acre total. This area is the largest MSHCP ever attempted and is an integral piece of the network of Southern California Habitat Conservation Plans and Natural Community Conservation Planning (Dudek 2001, Dudek 2003). Riverside County is one of the fastest growing counties in California, as well as one of the most biodiverse counties in the United States. A wide array of habitats are found within the non-developed lands in Western Riverside County, including coastal sage scrub, vernal pools, montane coniferous forest, chaparral, foothill woodland, annual grassland, and desert. In the CNPS contract, vegetation resources were assessed quantitatively through field surveys, data analysis, and final vegetation classification. Field survey data were analyzed statistically to come up with a floristically-based classification. Each vegetation type sampled was classified according to the National Vegetation Classification System to the alliance level (and association level if possible). The vegetation alliances were described floristically and environmentally in standard descriptions, and a final key was produced to differentiate among 101 alliances, 169 associations, and 3 unique stands (for final report, see https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18245). In a parallel but separate effort by AIS (as reported in this dataset), vegetation mapping was undertaken through interpretation of ortho-rectified, aerial photographs for vegetation signatures in color infrared (CIR) and in natural color (imagery flown in winter or summer). A detailed map has been produced through the following process: 1) hand-delineation of polygons on base CIR imagery, 2) digitization of polygons, and 3) attribution of the vegetation types and overstory cover values. The map was created in a Geographic Information System (GIS) digital format, as was the database of field surveys. The dataset was produced through an on-screen photo interpretation procedure using three sets of geo-referenced imagery. The data is classified to a floristic classification derived through clustering analysis procedures based on species dominance and significance. The classification is based on the MCV (Manual of California Vegetation) in which 103 alliances and 169 floristic associations have been defined for the study area. Over 3300 full plot and reconnaissance points have been used in helping classify the mapped polygons. Mapped polygons are classified to either an association, alliance or mapping unit which may be an aggregation of associations or alliances. The dataset encompasses the western portions of Riverside County from the county boundary on the west eastward to the summit of the San Jacinto Mountains and Anza valley.

  20. m

    Network-risk framework for ArcGIS (v1 and v2; Bucharest road network data...

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Dec 13, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dragos Toma-Danila (2021). Network-risk framework for ArcGIS (v1 and v2; Bucharest road network data included) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/wp69xrf2c5.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 13, 2021
    Authors
    Dragos Toma-Danila
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    INFP and CRMD have recently developed a framework capable of analyzing direct and indirect implications of natural hazards on transportation networks. This is currently embedded into an ArcGIS toolbox entitled Network-risk, which has been successfully tested for Bucharest, contributing to an insightful evaluation of emergency intervention times for ambulances and firefighters, in the case of an earthquake.

    You will find in the files two versions of the toolbox: 1 (explained and used in Toma-Danila et al., 2020) and 2 (under review, along with the sample dataset for Bucharest). New improved versions are soon going to be published.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
US Agency for International Development (2024). Geographic Management Information System [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/geographic-management-information-system

Geographic Management Information System

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Sep 4, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
US Agency for International Development
Description

The Geographic Management Information System (GeoMIS) is a FISMA Moderate minor application built using ArcGIS Server and portal, Microsoft SQL, and a web-facing front-end. The system can be accessed over the internet via https://www.usaidgiswbg.com using a web browser. GeoMIS is based on a commercial off-the-shelf product developed by Esri. Esri is creates geographic information system (GIS) software, web GIS and geodatabase management applications and is based in California. GeoMISIt is maintained by an Israeli company, Systematics (see Attachment 3) which is EsriI's agent in Israel. The mission has an annual maintenance contract with Systematics for GeoMIS. GeoMIS has 100 users from USAID staff (USA Direct Hire and Foreign Service Nationals) and 200 users from USAID contractors and grantees. The system is installed at USAID WBG office in Tel Aviv/Israel inside the computer room in the DMZ. It has no interconnections with any other system.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu