Abstract

The Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) was founded in 2006 with a mandate to collect, analyze, and disseminate statistical data. KNBS provides essential economic indicators like GDP, inflation rates, and unemployment rates, enabling informed policy decisions. Beyond economics, it supports county governments, conducts population censuses, and addresses regional challenges such as water and sanitation needs. KNBS ensures data-driven approaches to education and environmental conservation. With its commitment to reliable statistics, KNBS plays a central role in Kenya’s development journey.The Kenya National Bureau of Statistics disseminates microdata on their National Data Archive data dissemination platform, KeNADA. Datasets include household and firm-level data from surveys conducted by government agencies as well as administrative records. Datasets from 1969 to the current year are listed on the KeNADA site.

Analysis unit

Households, individuals, and establishments

Kind of data

Administrative records and survey data

Kenya KNBS Projection: Population: Total data was reported at 63,860.000 Person th in 2030. This records an increase from the previous number of 56,999.000 Person th for 2025. Kenya KNBS Projection: Population: Total data is updated yearly, averaging 56,999.000 Person th from Dec 2020 (Median) to 2030, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 63,860.000 Person th in 2030 and a record low of 50,319.000 Person th in 2020. Kenya KNBS Projection: Population: Total data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kenya – Table KE.G002: Population: Projection: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.

Abstract

The World Bank and UNHCR in collaboration with the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics and the University of California, Berkeley are conducting the Kenya COVID-19 Rapid Response Phone Survey to track the socioeconomic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the recovery from it as well as other shocks to provide timely data to inform a targeted response. This dataset contains information from eight waves of the COVID-19 RRPS, which is part of a panel survey that targets refugee household and started in May 2020. The same households were interviewed every two months for five survey rounds, in the first year of data collection, and every four months thereafter, with interviews conducted using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) techniques. The sample aims to be representative of the refugee and stateless population in Kenya. It comprises five strata: Kakuma refugee camp, Kalobeyei settlement, Dadaab refugee camp, urban refugees, and Shona stateless. Waves 1-7 of this survey include information on household background, service access, employment, food security, income loss, transfers, health, and COVID-19 knowledge. Wave 8 focused on how households were exposed to shocks, in particular adverse weather shocks and the increase in the price of food and fuel, but also included parts of the previous modules on household background, service access, employment, food security, income loss, and subjective wellbeing. The data is uploaded in three files. The first is the hh file, which contains household level information. The 'hhid', uniquely identifies all household. The second is the adult level file, which contains data at the level of adult household members. Each adult in a household is uniquely identified by the 'adult_id'. The third file is the child level file, available only for waves 3-7, which contains information for every child in the household. Each child in a household is uniquely identified by the 'child_id'. The duration of data collection and sample size for each completed wave was: Wave 1: May 14 to July 7, 2020; 1,328 refugee households Wave 2: July 16 to September 18, 2020; 1,699 refugee households Wave 3: September 28 to December 2, 2020; 1,487 refugee households Wave 4: January 15 to March 25, 2021; 1,376 refugee households Wave 5: March 29 to June 13, 2021; 1,562 refugee households Wave 6: July 14 to November 3, 2021; 1,407 refugee households Wave 7: November 15, 2021, to March 31, 2022; 1,281 refugee households Wave 8: May 31 to July 8, 2022: 1,355 refugee households The same questionnaire is also administered to nationals in Kenya, with the data available in the WB microdata library: https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/3774

Geographic coverage

National coverage covering rural and urban areas

Analysis unit

Individual and Household

Universe

All persons of concern for UNHCR

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample aims to be representative of the refugee and stateless population in Kenya. It comprises five strata: Kakuma refugee camp, Kalobeyei settlement, Dadaab refugee camp, urban refugees, and Shona stateless, where sampling approaches differ across strata. For refugees in Kakuma and Kalobeyei, as well as for stateless people, recently conducted Socioeconomic Surveys (SES), were used as sampling frames. For the refugee population living in urban areas and the Dadaab camp, no such household survey data existed, and sampling frames were based on UNHCR's registration records (proGres), which include phone numbers. For Kakuma, Kalobeyei, Dadaab and urban refugees, a two-step sampling process was used. First, 1,000 individuals from each stratum were selected from the corresponding sampling frames. Each of these individuals received a text message to confirm that the registered phone was still active. In the second stage, implicitly stratifying by sex and age, the verified phone number lists were used to select the sample. Until wave 7 sampled households that were not reached in earlier waves were also contacted along with households that were interviewed before. In wave 8 only households that had previously participated in the survey were contacted for interview. The “wave” variable represents in which wave the households were interviewed in. For the stateless population, all the participants of the Shona socioeconomic survey (n=400) were included in the RRPS, because of limited sample size. The sampling frames for the refugee and Shona stateless communities are thus representative of households with active phone numbers registered with UNHCR.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]

Research instrument

The questionnaire included 12 sections Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Household background Section 3: Travel patterns and interactions Section 4: Employment Section 5: Food security Section 6: Income Loss Section 7: Transfers Section 8: Subjective welfare (50% of sample) Section 9: Health Section 10: COVID Knowledge Section 11: Household and Social Relations (50% of sample) Section 12: Conclusion

Cleaning operations

Variable names were kept constant across survey waves. For questions that remained exactly the same across survey waves, data points for all waves can be found under one variable name. For questions where the phrasing changed (even in a minimal way) across waves, variable names were also changed to reflect the change in phrasing. Extended missing values are used to indicate why a value is missing for all variables. The following extended missing values are used in the dataset: · .a for 'Don't know' · .b for 'Refused to respond' · .c for 'Outliers set to missing' · .d for 'Inconsistency set to missing' (used for employment data as explained below) · .e for 'Field Skipped' (where an error in the survey tool caused the question to be missed) · .z for 'Not administered' (as the variable was not relevant to the observation) More detailed data on children was collected between waves 3 and 7, compared to waves 1, 2 and 8. In waves 1 and 2, data on children, e.g. on their learning activities, was collected for all children in a household with one question. Therefore, variables related to children are part of the 'hh' data for waves 1 and 2. Between waves 3 and 7, questions on children in the household were asked for specific children. Some questions covered all children, while others were only administered to one randomly selected child in the household. This approach allows to disaggregate data at the level of the child household members, and the data can be found in the 'child' data set. The household level weights can be used for analysis of the children's data. In wave 8, detailed information on children was dropped, as the questionnaire focused on other topics. The education status of household members, except for the respondent, was imputed for rounds 1 and 2. For rounds 1 and 2, only the education status of the respondent was elicited, while for later rounds the education status for each household member was asked. In order to evaluate outcomes by the household member's education status, information on education was imputed for waves 1 and 2, using the information provided for all household members in waves 3, 4, and 5. This resulted in additional information on the education status for household members in round 1 and 2, which was not yet available for earlier versions of this data. Some questions are not asked repeatedly across waves such that their values were imputed. For some questions, answers are not possible or unlikely to change within two months between survey waves such that households were not asked about them in all waves. The questions on assets owned before March 2020 were only asked to households when they are interviewed for the first time. The questions on the dwelling's wall and floor material as well as the household's connection to the power grid was not asked for all households in wave 2 and 3, where only new households and those who moved were covered by these questions. Questions on the main source of electricity in the households and types of assets owned were not asked in wave 8. The missing values those variables have when they were not asked, are imputed from the answers given in earlier waves. Improved quality insurance algorithms lead to minor revisions to wave 1 to 5 data. Based on additional data checks, the team has made minor refinements to wave 1 to 5 data. The identification of the household members that were the respondent or the household head was refined in the rare cases where it was not possible to interview the same respondent as in previous waves for a given household such that another adult was interviewed. For this reason, for about 2 percent of observations the household head status was assigned to an incorrect household member, which was corrected. For <1 percent of households the respondent did not appear in adult level dataset. For about 1 percent of observations in wave 5 the respondent appeared twice in the adult level dataset. Data from questions on COVID-19 vaccinations from wave 7 was dropped from the dataset. Due to significantly higher self-reported vaccination rates compared to official administrative records, data on vaccinations was deemed unreliable, most likely due to social desirability bias. Consequently, questions on vaccination status and questions using the vaccination data as a validation criterion were dropped from the datasets.

Abstract

The Kenya National Micronutrients Survey (NMS) 2011 was the first NMS to be carried by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The purpose of this survey is to ensure the quality of HIV testing and the interpretation of results, both in the laboratory and in the community. Fort HIV testing, it is extremely important that "the correct results go to the right client". The identity of clients and the labelling of test devices should therefore be preserved properly.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

• Households
• Individuals

Universe

The survey covered household members (usual residents), womens questinnaire( aged 15-49 years) resident in the household, children( aged 0-6-49months), School age children (aged 5-14 years) resident in the household and Men questionnire (aged 15-54 year).

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Sample size estimation The sample size required for each stratum was based on the estimated prevalence for each nutritional indicator, the desired precision for each indicator, an assumed design effect of 2.0, and a non-response of 10% (including refusals) at the household level and 10% at the individual levels for children 6-59 months of age and non-pregnant women. An additional non-response rate of 10% (for a total 30% non-response rate) was assumed for the men and SAC 5-14 years old.

Sampling design In 2010, Kenya ratified a new constitution which established 47 county governments. This change has highlighted the need for national surveys to collect information beyond the provincial level, and move towards collection of county-level estimates. However, obtaining county-level estimates with adequate precision were not considered feasible in KNMS due to limitations in sample size and resources. Therefore KNMS consisted of the three domains as defined earlier. The sampling frame for the 2010 KMNS was based on the National Sample Survey and Evaluation Programme (NASSEP IV) master sampling frame maintained by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). Administratively, Kenya is divided into 8 provinces. In turn, each province is The Kenya National Micronutrient Survey 2011 subdivided into districts, each district into divisions, each division into locations and each location into sub-locations. In addition to these administrative units, during the last 1999 population census, each sub-location was subdivided into census Enumeration Areas (EAs) i.e. small geographic units with clearly defined boundaries. As defined in the 1999 census, Kenya has eight provinces, 69 districts, and approximately 62,000 EAs. The list of EAs is grouped by administrative units and includes information on the number of households and population. This information was used in 2002 to design a master sample with about 1,800 selected EAs. The cartographic material for each EA in the master sample was updated in the field. The resulting master sampling frame was NASSEP IV which is still currently used by KNBS. The NASSEP IV master frame is a two-stage stratified cluster sample format. The first stage is a selection of Primary Sampling Units (PSUs), which are the EAs using probability proportional to measure of size (PPMOS) method. The second stage involves the selection of households for various surveys. EAs are selected with a basis of one Measure of Size (MOS) defined as the ultimate cluster with an average of 100 households and constitute one (or more) EAs. Although consideration was given to development of a new master frame for KNMS, time and other resource constraints dictated that the sample frame of this survey was NASSEP IV. The KNMS sample was selected using a stratified two-stage cluster design consisting of 296 clusters, 123 in the urban and 173 in the rural areas. From each cluster a total of 10 households were selected using systematic simple random sampling. For the KNMS survey, an urban area was defined as "an area with an increased density of human-created structures in comparison to the areas surrounding it and has a population of 2,000 people and above". Using this definition, urban areas included Cities, Municipalities, Town Councils, Urban Councils and all District Headquarters. A rural area was defined as an isolated large area of an open country in reference to open fields with peoples whose main economic activity was farming. Every attempt was made to conduct interviews in the 10 selected households, and one additional visit was made to ascertain this compliance in cases of absence of household members to minimize potential bias. Non responding households were not replaced.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The survey covers household members questionnaire (usual residents), women questinnaire ( aged 15-49 years), preschool children questionnarie( aged 6-59 months), school age children questionnaire (aged 5-14 years) and men questionnire (aged 15-54 year). The hosehold member questionnaire includes: Identification, Interviewer Visits, Socio demographic characteristics, Socio-economic characteristics, Food fortification, Wheat flour fortification, Salt fortification, Sugar fortification, Oils/fats fortification, Interviewer's observations. The women questionnarie includes: Identification, Interviewer Visits, Micronutrient Supplementation and Pica Questions, WRA Health questions. The school age children questionnaire includes: Identification, Interviewer Visits, Micronutrient Supplementation and Pica Questions, Child Health questions, Dietary Diversity Score Questions, Infant Feeding Practice Questions children 6-35 months, Interviewer Observations, The preschool children questionnarie includes: Identification, Interviewer Visits, Micronutrient Supplementation and Pica Questions, Child Health questions, Interviewer Observations. The men questionnarie includes: Identification, Interviewer Visits, Health questions, Interviewer Observations.

Cleaning operations

The field questionnaires baring household characteristics, individual population characteristics, and anthropometrics measurements were double entered into a computer database designed using MS-Access application. Regular file back-up was done using flash disks and external hard disk to avoid any loss or tampering. Data comparison was done using Epi-info version 7.0. Data cleaning and validation was performed to achieve clean datasets. The datasets were exported into a Statistical Package format (IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 20.0). The laboratory results were entered in excel format and later exported into a Statistical Package format (IBM® SPSS®Statistics version 20.0). Data merging exercise was systematically conducted using the four datasets i.e. household characteristics, individual population characteristics, anthropometrics measurements, and laboratory results. Each of the five populations namely; Pre-school children (PSC), School aged children (SAC), Pregnant women (PW), Non-pregnant women (NPW), and Men were separately merged. Data merging was conducted as follows: STEP1: The 'laboratory results' file was first merged to the 'anthropometrics' file using 'LABLE NUMBER' as the unique identifier. STEP2: The merged 'laboratory + anthropometrics' file was merged to individual population characteristics file using a merging variable constructed by concatenating 'CLUSTER NUMBER + HOUSEHOLD NUMBER + LINE NUMBER' as the unique identifier. STEP3: The merged 'laboratory + anthropometrics + individual population characteristics' file was merged to the 'household characteristics' file using a merging variable constructed by concatenating 'CLUSTER NUMBER + HOUSEHOLD NUMBER + LINE NUMBER' as the unique identifier. Five master-files were backed-up for safe keeping and a copy was shared with the statisticians for analysis. All the questionnaires and laboratory forms were filed and stored in lockable drawers for confidentiality.

The validated data was exported to SPSS Version 20 for analysis.

Abstract

The 2015/16 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey (KIHBS) was conducted over a 12-month period to obtain up-to-date data on a range of socioeconomic indicators used to monitor the implementation of development initiatives. The Survey collected data on household characteristics, housing conditions, education, general health characteristics, nutrition, household income and credit, household transfers, information communication technology, domestic tourism, shocks to household welfare and access to justice. The findings are presented at national, county, rural and urban domains.

Household Characteristics The findings of the 2015/16 KIHBS basic characteristics of the population show that the sex ratio is 97.5. About 70 per cent of households were headed by males and the reported average household size was 4 members. The age dependency ratio declined to 81.6 per cent in 2015/16 KIHBS as compared to 84.0 per cent recorded in 2005/06 KIHBS. Majority (54.4%) of the population aged 18 years and above are in monogamous unions. At the national level, 8.4 per cent of children were orphans.

Housing Conditions and amenities Information regarding housing conditions and ownership, access to water, energy, sanitation and waste disposal was collected in the 2015/16 KIHBS. Bungalow was the most common dwelling type of housing occupied by 55.4 per cent of the households. About 60 per cent of households reported that they owned the dwellings that they resided in. The findings show that 72.6 per cent of households use improved drinking water sources. The statistics show that six out ten households had access to improved human waste disposal methods. Overall, 41.4 per cent of households were connected to electricity from the main grid.

Education Findings on education are presented for; pre-primary, primary, secondary, middle level college and university levels; and informal education, Madrassa/Duksi. Nationally, 89.4 per cent of the population aged three years and above had ever attended school. The overall Gross Attendance (GAR) for pre-primary, primary and secondary levels was 94.4 per cent, 107.2 per cent and 66.2 per cent, respectively. The population aged 3 years and above that did not have any educational qualification was 49.7 per cent. Most of the population aged 3 years and above that had not attended school cited not being allowed to attend by parent(s) as the reason for non-attendance. The proportion of the population aged 15-24 years that was literate, based on respondents' self -assessment, was 88.3 per cent.

General Health Characteristics General health characteristics discussed in the report comprise: morbidity by sex, health seeking behaviour, utilization of health care services and facilities, disability and engagement in economic activities and health insurance coverage. Information on child survival such as place of delivery, assistance during delivery, immunization and incidences of diarrhoea is also presented. The results show that two out of ten individuals reported a sickness or injury over the four weeks preceding the survey. Majority of the individuals (55.5 %) with a sickness or injury visited a health worker at a health facility for diagnosis. Disabilities were reported by 2.8 per cent of the population. Slightly more than a third of persons with disabilities reported having difficulty in engaging in economic activities. moderately stunted. A higher proportion (32.4%) of children in the rural areas were moderately stunted compared to those in urban areas (24.5%). Overall, 13.0 per cent of children were moderately wasted while 6.7 per cent were moderately underweight. The statistics further indicate that 98.8 per cent of children aged 0-59 months were ever breast fed. The mean length of breastfeeding nationally stood at 16.8 months. Porridge was the most common type of first supplement given to majority (35.9%) of children aged 0-23 months. The survey findings show that eight out of ten children participated in community-based nutritional programmes.

Household Income and Credit Household income is the aggregate earnings of all household members. It includes all forms of income arising from employment, household enterprises, agricultural produce, rent, pension and financial investment. The discussion in this report focuses on income from rent, pension, financial investment and other related incomes. Information is also provided on access and sources of credit. At national level, 7.2 per cent of households reported having received income from rent, pension, financial investment and other related incomes within the 12 months preceding the survey. A third of the households sought credit and over 90 per cent successfully acquired credit.

Household Transfers Transfers constitute income, in cash or in kind, that the household receives without working for it and it augments household income by improving its welfare. Three out of ten households reported having received cash transfers within the 12 months preceding the survey period. The average amount received per household from cash transfers was KSh. 27,097. Majority of households received cash transfers through a family member. Money transfer agents were the preferred mode of transmitting money for most beneficiaries of transfers received from outside Kenya. Over half of the households gave out transfers in kind.

Information and Communication Technology The 2015/16 KIHBS collected information on ICT equipment use and ownership. Findings show that three in every four individuals aged 18 years and above owned a mobile phone with an average number of 1.3 SIM cards per person. The most commonly used ICT equipment is the radio and mobile phone, reported by 79.3 per cent and 68.5 per cent of individuals aged 3 years and above, respectively. The highest proportion (50.3%) of those that did not own a mobile phone cited its high cost as the reason. Urban areas had the highest proportion of population with ownership of a mobile phone. Nairobi City County had the highest proportion of population with a mobile phone while Turkana County had the lowest. The population aged 3 years and above that reported using internet over the last three months preceding the survey was 16.6 per cent. Three in every ten households had internet connectivity and use of internet in mobility was reported as the most common place of use of internet. The internet was used mainly for social networking. No need to use the internet was the most predominant reason for not using the internet reported by 30.1 per cent of those who did not use it.

Domestic Tourism Domestic tourism comprises activities of residents travelling to and staying at least over a night in places outside their usual environment within the country, for not more than 12 months, for leisure, business or other purposes. At national level, 13.4 per cent of individuals reported that they travelled within Kenya in the 3 months preceding the survey. Visiting friends and relatives was reported by the highest proportion (71.1%) of individuals taking trips. Majority of those who took a trip (66.4%) reported that they sponsored themselves. Transport costs accounted for the largest share (38.4%) of expenditure on domestic tourism. Majority of those who did not take a trip reported high cost as a reason.

Shocks to Household Welfare A shock is an event that may trigger a decline in the well-being of an individual, a community, a region, or even a nation. The report presents information on shocks which occurred during the five-year period preceding the survey and had a negative impact on households' economic status or welfare. Three in every five households reported having experienced at least one shock within the five years preceding the survey. A large rise infood prices was reported by the highest proportion (30.1 per cent) of households as a first severe shock. Most households reported that they spent their savings to cope with the shock(s).

Justice The survey sought information from household members on their experiences regarding grievances/disputes, resolution mechanisms, status of grievance/dispute resolution and costs incurred. Majority of households (26.2%) experienced grievances related to succession and inheritance. Approximately seven out of ten households that experienced grievances reported that they were resolved by parties from whom they sought interventions. Lawyers on average received the highest amount of money (KSh 59,849) paid to a primary organization for grievance resolution through a formal channel. Courts accounted for the highest informal costs averaging KSh 6,260 in grievance resolution.

Geographic coverage

The survey covers all the Counties in Kenya based on the following levels National, Urban, Rural and County

Analysis unit

Households Indviduals within Households and Community

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Design and Sample Selection The second Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey 2015/16 will be the eighth household budget survey to be conducted in Kenya following those conducted in 1981/82, 1983/84, 1992, 1994, 1997 and 2005/06. The KIHBS 2015/16 is a multi-indicator survey in nature with the main objective of updating the household consumption patterns in all the Counties.

KIHBS 2015/16 is designed to provide estimates for various indicators at the County-level. A total of 50 study domains are envisaged. These are; all the forty-seven (47) counties (Each as a separate domain), urban and rural (each as a separate domain at National level), and lastly the National-level aggregate.

Sampling frame The sampling frame used for KIHBS 2015/16 is the fifth National Sample Survey and Evaluation Program (NASSEP V) master frame developed from the Population and Housing Census (KPHC) conducted in

Abstract

The 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (2022 KDHS) was implemented by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health (MoH) and other stakeholders. The survey is the 7th KDHS implemented in the country.

The primary objective of the 2022 KDHS is to provide up-to-date estimates of basic sociodemographic, nutrition and health indicators. Specifically, the 2022 KDHS collected information on: • Fertility levels and contraceptive prevalence • Childhood mortality • Maternal and child health • Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) • Anthropometric measures for children, women, and men • Children’s nutrition • Woman’s dietary diversity • Knowledge and behaviour related to the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases • Noncommunicable diseases and other health issues • Extent and pattern of gender-based violence • Female genital mutilation.

The information collected in the 2022 KDHS will assist policymakers and programme managers in monitoring, evaluating, and designing programmes and strategies for improving the health of Kenya’s population. The 2022 KDHS also provides indicators relevant to monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for Kenya, as well as indicators relevant for monitoring national and subnational development agendas such as the Kenya Vision 2030, Medium Term Plans (MTPs), and County Integrated Development Plans (CIDPs).

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

• Household
• Individual
• Children age 0-5
• Woman age 15-49
• Man age 15-54

Universe

The survey covered all de jure household members (usual residents), all women aged 15-49, men ageed 15-54, and all children aged 0-4 resident in the household.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample for the 2022 KDHS was drawn from the Kenya Household Master Sample Frame (K-HMSF). This is the frame that KNBS currently uses to conduct household-based sample surveys in Kenya. The frame is based on the 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census (KPHC) data, in which a total of 129,067 enumeration areas (EAs) were developed. Of these EAs, 10,000 were selected with probability proportional to size to create the K-HMSF. The 10,000 EAs were randomised into four equal subsamples. A survey can utilise a subsample or a combination of subsamples based on the sample size requirements. The 2022 KDHS sample was drawn from subsample one of the K-HMSF. The EAs were developed into clusters through a process of household listing and geo-referencing. The Constitution of Kenya 2010 established a devolved system of government in which Kenya is divided into 47 counties. To design the frame, each of the 47 counties in Kenya was stratified into rural and urban strata, which resulted in 92 strata since Nairobi City and Mombasa counties are purely urban.

The 2022 KDHS was designed to provide estimates at the national level, for rural and urban areas separately, and, for some indicators, at the county level. The sample size was computed at 42,300 households, with 25 households selected per cluster, which resulted in 1,692 clusters spread across the country, 1,026 clusters in rural areas, and 666 in urban areas. The sample was allocated to the different sampling strata using power allocation to enable comparability of county estimates.

The 2022 KDHS employed a two-stage stratified sample design where in the first stage, 1,692 clusters were selected from the K-HMSF using the Equal Probability Selection Method (EPSEM). The clusters were selected independently in each sampling stratum. Household listing was carried out in all the selected clusters, and the resulting list of households served as a sampling frame for the second stage of selection, where 25 households were selected from each cluster. However, after the household listing procedure, it was found that some clusters had fewer than 25 households; therefore, all households from these clusters were selected into the sample. This resulted in 42,022 households being sampled for the 2022 KDHS. Interviews were conducted only in the pre-selected households and clusters; no replacement of the preselected units was allowed during the survey data collection stages.

For further details on sample design, see APPENDIX A of the survey report.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

Four questionnaires were used in the 2022 KDHS: Household Questionnaire, Woman’s Questionnaire, Man’s Questionnaire, and the Biomarker Questionnaire. The questionnaires, based on The DHS Program’s model questionnaires, were adapted to reflect the population and health issues relevant to Kenya. In addition, a self-administered Fieldworker Questionnaire was used to collect information about the survey’s fieldworkers.

Cleaning operations

CAPI was used during data collection. The devices used for CAPI were Android-based computer tablets programmed with a mobile version of CSPro. The CSPro software was developed jointly by the U.S. Census Bureau, Serpro S.A., and The DHS Program. Programming of questionnaires into the Android application was done by ICF, while configuration of tablets was completed by KNBS in collaboration with ICF. All fieldwork personnel were assigned usernames, and devices were password protected to ensure the integrity of the data.

Work was assigned by supervisors and shared via Bluetooth® to interviewers’ tablets. After completion, assigned work was shared with supervisors, who conducted initial data consistency checks and edits and then submitted data to the central servers hosted at KNBS via SyncCloud. Data were downloaded from the central servers and checked against the inventory of expected returns to account for all data collected in the field. SyncCloud was also used to generate field check tables to monitor progress and identify any errors, which were communicated back to the field teams for correction.

Secondary editing was done by members of the KNBS and ICF central office team, who resolved any errors that were not corrected by field teams during data collection. A CSPro batch editing tool was used for cleaning and tabulation during data analysis.

Response rate

A total of 42,022 households were selected for the survey, of which 38,731 (92%) were found to be occupied. Among the occupied households, 37,911 were successfully interviewed, yielding a response rate of 98%. The response rates for urban and rural households were 96% and 99%, respectively. In the interviewed households, 33,879 women age 15-49 were identified as eligible for individual interviews. Of these, 32,156 women were interviewed, yielding a response rate of 95%. The response rates among women selected for the full and short questionnaires were similar (95%). In the households selected for the men’s survey, 16,552 men age 15-54 were identified as eligible for individual interviews and 14,453 were successfully interviewed, yielding a response rate of 87%.

Sampling error estimates

The estimates from a sample survey are affected by two types of errors: (1) non-sampling errors, and (2) sampling errors. Non-sampling errors are the results of mistakes made in implementing data collection and data processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household, misunderstanding of the questions on the part of either the interviewer or the respondent, and data entry errors. Although numerous efforts were made during the implementation of the 2022 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (2022 KDHS) to minimise this type of error, non-sampling errors are impossible to avoid and difficult to evaluate statistically.

Sampling errors, on the other hand, can be evaluated statistically. The sample of respondents selected in the 2022 KDHS is only one of many samples that could have been selected from the same population, using the same design and identical size. Each of these samples would yield results that differ somewhat from the results of the actual sample selected. Sampling errors are a measure of the variability between all possible samples. Although the degree of variability is not known exactly, it can be estimated from the survey results.

A sampling error is usually measured in terms of the standard error for a particular statistic (mean, percentage, etc.), which is the square root of the variance. The standard error can be used to calculate confidence intervals within which the true value for the population can reasonably be assumed to fall. For example, for any given statistic calculated from a sample survey, the value of that statistic will fall within a range of plus or minus two times the standard error of that statistic in 95 percent of all possible samples of identical size and design.

If the sample of respondents had been selected as a simple random sample, it would have been possible to use straightforward formulas for calculating sampling errors. However, the 2022 KDHS sample is the result of a multi-stage stratified design, and, consequently, it was necessary to use more complex formulae. The computer software used to calculate sampling errors for the 2022 KDHS is a SAS program. This program used the Taylor linearisation method for variance estimation for survey estimates that are means, proportions or ratios. The Jackknife repeated replication method is used for variance estimation of more complex statistics such as fertility and mortality rates.

A more detailed description of estimates of sampling errors are presented in APPENDIX B of the survey report.

Data

Abstract

The MSME sector in Kenya has over the years been recognized for its role in provision of goods and services, enhancing competition, fostering innovation, generating employment and in effect, alleviation of poverty. The crucial role of MSMEs is underscored in Kenya's Vision 2030 - the development blueprint which seeks to transform Kenya into an industrialized middle-income country, providing a high-quality life to all its citizens by the year 2030. The MSME sector has been identified and prioritized as a key growth driver for achievement of the development blue print.

The measurement of the size of the sector in terms of employment as well as its contribution to Gross Domestic Product [GDP] and the generation of income is of major importance. This is not only because of their usefulness in the design of appropriate policies and programmes but also in understanding their dynamics in terms of income, wages, growth patterns, sector and their evolving nature among others. MSMEs tend to be dynamic: the structure and their operations change considerably within a short time. The last comprehensive study is the 1999 National Micro and Small Enterprise (MSE) Baseline Survey. The 2016 National MSME Survey was therefore, designed to respond to the existing data gap and sought to provide data at national and county levels. The unit of observation was the establishments and the survey targeted those that engaged at most 99 persons. The terms establishment, enterprise and business are however, used interchangeably in this report.

Geographic coverage

i) National ii) Counties and iii) Urban and rural residence

Analysis unit

i) National ii) Counties and iii) Urban and rural residence

Kind of data

Census/enumeration data [cen]

Sampling procedure

Survey Design The previous MSE studies used the household-based approach to identify businesses/establishments. However, the 2016 MSME survey, in addition to the household-based approach, interviewed businesses/establishments identified from business registers maintained by county governments. The 2016 MSME survey was cross-sectional and was designed to provide estimates at national and county levels. The survey used a representative probability sample design aimed at producing estimates at the following domains; · National · Counties and · Urban and rural residence (For Unlicensed businesses only.

The survey adopted a stratified random sampling method for the establishment-based sample in which a systematic random sample of establishments was drawn using equal probability selection method. For the household-based sample, a two-stage stratified cluster sampling design was used where the first stage involved selection of 600 clusters (354 in rural and 246 in urban) with equal probability. In the second stage, a uniform random sample of 24 households in each cluster was selected using systematic random sampling method.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

One Enterprise questionnaire

Abstract

In an effort to address the ICT data challenges, the Communications Commission of Kenya (CCK) partnered with Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) to undertake a comprehensive National ICT Survey. This was planned and executed during the months of May and June 2010.

The main objective of the study was to collect, collate and analyse data relating to ICT access and usage by various categorizations in Kenya. The survey captured data and information on critical ICT indicators as defined by international bodies such as the International Telecommunications Union (ITU). These indicators focused on household and individuals; and the data was be disaggregated by age, gender, administrative regions, rural and urban locations.

The specific objectives of the study were to; Obtain social economic information with a view of understanding usage patterns of ICT services; (a) Obtain social economic information with a view of understanding usage patterns of ICT services; (b) Collect, collate and analyze ICT statistics in line with ICT indicators; (c) Evaluate the factors that will have the greatest impact in ensuring access and usage of ICTs and; (d) Develop a database on access and usage of ICT in Kenya

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

District, Household, Individual

Universe

Households from the sampled areas.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The National Sample Survey and Evaluation Programme (NASSEP IV) maintained by the Bureau was used as the sampling frame. The frame has 1,800 clusters spread all over the country, and covers all socio-economic classes and hence able to get a suitable and representative sample of the population. The survey was distributed into four domains, namely: 1. National, 2. Major Urban areas, 3. Other Urban areas, and 4. Rural areas.

The major urban towns included Nairobi, Thika, Mombasa, Kisumu, Nakuru and Eldoret. All other areas defined as urban by KNBS but fall outside the major municipalities above were categorized as 'other urban areas'. The rural domain was further sub-divided into their respective provinces, excluding Nairobi which is purely urban. For the 'rural' component, the districts that display identical socio-cultural and economic conditions have been pooled together to create strata from which a representative set of districts is selected to represent the group of such districts. A total of 42 such stratifications were done and one district in each categorization was selected. The major urban areas of the country namely Nairobi, Mombasa, Kisumu, Nakuru, Eldoret and Thika were all sub-stratified into five sub-strata based on perceived levels of income into the: 1. Upper income 2. Lower Upper 3. Middle 4. Lower Middle and 5. Lower.

In this survey, all the six 'major urban' are included while just a few of the 'other urban areas' are selected depending on their population (household) distribution.

Selection of the Clusters for the Survey The selection of the sample clusters was done systematically using the Equal Probability Selection method (EPSEM). Since NASSEP IV was developed using Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) method, the resulting sample retains its properties. The selection was done independently within the districts and the urban /rural sub-stratum.

Selection of the Households From each selected cluster, an equal number of 15 households were selected systematically, with a random start. The systematic sampling method was adopted as it enables the distribution of the sample across the cluster evenly and yields good estimates for the population parameters. Selection of the households was done at the office and assigned to the Research Assistants, with strictly no allowance for replacement of non-responding households.

Sampling deviation

Owing to the some logistical challenges the following clusters were partially or not covered at all: • One cluster in Tana River due to floods. • Two clusters in Molo where households shifted to safer areas after the Post Election Violence (PEV). As a result, fewer than the expected households were covered. • One cluster in Koibatek was covered halfway due to relocation of households to pave way for a large plantation.

Where there was no school found within the cluster, Research Assistant was allowed to sample an institution from a neighbouring cluster. In some districts, the schools were found to be very far from the cluster and therefore could not be covered. Where a cluster was to be covered over a weekend, it was often not possible to find a responsible person in institutions to respond to the questionnaire.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Household questionnaire: This will be used to collect background information pertaining to the members of the household and businesses operated by household members. It will collect information about each person in the household such as name, sex, age, education, and relationship to household head etcetera. This information is vital for calculating certain socio-demographic characteristics of the household. The Business module in the household questionnaire will be used to collect information pertaining to usage of ICT in businesses identified in the household. To estimate the magnitude, levels and distribution of ICT usage in the country, all the selected respondents 15 years and above will be subjected to business questionnaire.

Institutional Questionnaire: This will collect information pertaining to institutions providing ICT related programmes in the country. This information will be analyzed to identify gaps and other issues of concern, which need to be addressed in the promotion ICT provision in the country.

Cleaning operations

As a matter of procedure initial manual editing was done in the field by the RAs. The supervisors further checked the questionnaires and validated the data in the field by randomly sampling 20 per cent of the filled questionnaires. After the questionnaires were received from the field, an office editing team was constituted to do office editing.

Data was captured using Census and Survey Processing System (CSPRO) version 4.0 through a data entry screen specially created with checks to ensure accuracy during data entry. All questionnaires were double entered to ensure data quality. Erroneous entries and potential outliers were then verified and corrected appropriately. A total of 20 data entry personnel were engaged during the exercise.

The captured data were exported to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for cleaning and analysis. The cleaned data was weighted before final analysis. The weighting of the data involved application of inflation factors derived from the selection probabilities of the EAs and households detailed in section 2.2.7, on weighting the Sample Data.

Response rate

The overall response rate stood at 85.9 per cent. Nairobi had the lowest response rate at 69.4 per cent while the highest (94.6 per cent) was realized in North Eastern. More than 95.5 per cent of all the sampled households were occupied out of which 85.9 per cent were interviewed.

Kenya Employment data was reported at 19,996.300 Person th in 2023. This records an increase from the previous number of 19,148.200 Person th for 2022. Kenya Employment data is updated yearly, averaging 15,162.050 Person th from Jun 2008 (Median) to 2023, with 16 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 19,996.300 Person th in 2023 and a record low of 10,012.500 Person th in 2008. Kenya Employment data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kenya – Table KE.G005: Employment: by Sector and Industry: International Standard of Industrial Classification Rev 4.

Kenya Agricultural Production: Crops: Average Yield: Coffee: Co-Operatives data was reported at 302.100 kg/ha in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 361.100 kg/ha for 2016. Kenya Agricultural Production: Crops: Average Yield: Coffee: Co-Operatives data is updated yearly, averaging 257.000 kg/ha from Dec 2001 (Median) to 2017, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 383.800 kg/ha in 2014 and a record low of 189.000 kg/ha in 2008. Kenya Agricultural Production: Crops: Average Yield: Coffee: Co-Operatives data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kenya – Table KE.B007: Agricultural Production: Crops: Average Yield.

Abstract

The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countries and was later extended to 12 countries. Round 2 (2002-2004) surveyed citizens in 16 countries. Round 3 (2005-2006) 18 countries, Round 4 (2008) 20 countries, Round 5 (2011-2013) 34 countries, Round 6 (2014-2015) 36 countries, Round 7 (2016-2018) 34 countries, Round 8 (2019-2021), and Round 9 (2021-2023). The survey covers about 40 countries in Round 10.

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Citizens of Kenya who are 18 years and older

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

• using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewer alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

Kenya - Sample size: 2,400 - Sample design: Nationally representative, random, clustered, stratified, multi-stage area probability sample - Stratification: Region and urban-rural location - Stages: PSUs (from strata), start points, households, respondents - PSU selection: Probability Proportionate to Population Size (PPPS) - Cluster size: 8 households per PSU - Household selection: Randomly selected start points, followed by walk pattern using 5/10 interval - Respondent selection: Gender quota filled by alternating interviews between men and women; respondents of appropriate gender listed, after which computer randomly selects individual - Weighting: Weighted to account for individual selection probabilities - Sampling frame: Kenya Household Master Sample Frame (K-HMSF) drawn from the 2019 National Population and Housing Census produced by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS)

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The Round 10 questionnaire has been developed by the Questionnaire Committee after reviewing the findings and feedback obtained in previous Rounds, and securing input on preferred new topics from a host of donors, analysts, and users of the data.

Response rate

Response rate was 57.79%.

Sampling error estimates

The sample size yields country-level results with a margin of error of +/-2 percentage points at a 95% confidence level.

The Kenya National Bureau of Statistics has released the 2019 Economic Survey report which highlights the country’s economic performance for the year 2018. The report shows the economy has expanded by 6.3%, compared to 4.9% in 2017.

The Survey has other information spanning Kenya's economy such as employment statistics, public finance, agriculture, education, energy, manufacturing and more.

Kenya Road Transport: Number of Motor Vehicles: Registered data was reported at 4,588,770.000 Unit in 2022. This records an increase from the previous number of 4,353,891.000 Unit for 2021. Kenya Road Transport: Number of Motor Vehicles: Registered data is updated yearly, averaging 2,011,972.000 Unit from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2022, with 19 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4,588,770.000 Unit in 2022 and a record low of 711,142.000 Unit in 2004. Kenya Road Transport: Number of Motor Vehicles: Registered data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kenya – Table KE.TA001: Road Transport: Number of Motor Vehicles: Registered.

Kenya Road Transport: Length of Roads: Bitumen: National Trunk data was reported at 3,789.000 km in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,578.000 km for 2016. Kenya Road Transport: Length of Roads: Bitumen: National Trunk data is updated yearly, averaging 1,534.000 km from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,789.000 km in 2017 and a record low of 1,489.000 km in 2010. Kenya Road Transport: Length of Roads: Bitumen: National Trunk data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kenya – Table KE.TA003: Road Transport: Length of Roads: by Type and Classification.

Kenya Agricultural Area: Crops: Coffee: Co-Operatives data was reported at 88.800 ha th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 88.200 ha th for 2016. Kenya Agricultural Area: Crops: Coffee: Co-Operatives data is updated yearly, averaging 88.800 ha th from Dec 2001 (Median) to 2017, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 128.000 ha th in 2006 and a record low of 82.400 ha th in 2011. Kenya Agricultural Area: Crops: Coffee: Co-Operatives data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kenya – Table KE.B008: Agricultural Area: Crops.