In 2023/24, 26.4 percent of children in the United Kingdom were defined as living in absolute poverty, compared with 16.9 percent of working-age adults, 13.2 percent of pensioners, and 20 percent of families where someone is disabled.

As of 2023/24 approximately 10.1 million people were living in absolute poverty in the United Kingdom, with that number increasing to 12.3 million when housing costs are considered.

The Children in low-income families' local area statistics (CiLIF), provides information on the number and proportion of children living in Absolute low income by local area across the United Kingdom.The summary Statistical Release and tables which also show the proportions of children living in low income families are available here: Children in low income families: local area statistics - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)Statistics on the number of children in low income families by financial year are published on Stat-Xplore. Figures are calibrated to the Households Below Average Income (HBAI) survey regional estimates of children in low income but provide more granular local area information not available from the HBAI, for example by Local Authority, Westminster Parliamentary Constituency and Ward.Absolute low-income is defined as a family in low income Before Housing Costs (BHC) in the reference year in comparison with incomes in 2010/11. A family must have claimed Child Benefit and at least one other household benefit (Universal Credit, tax credits, or Housing Benefit) at any point in the year to be classed as low income in these statistics. Gross income measure is Before Housing Costs (BHC) and includes contributions from earnings, state support and pensions.

Statistical disclosure control has been applied with Stat-Xplore, which guards against the identification of an individual claimant.

The percentage of people defined as having low incomes in the United Kingdom has declined from **** percent in 1994/95 to **** percent in 2023/24, after housing costs are considered, and from **** percent to ** percent in the same time period before housing costs are considered.

Proportions and numbers of children, working age adults and pensioners in Scotland in absolute and relative poverty. Also contains figures on the distribution of household income. Source agency: Scottish Government Designation: National Statistics Language: English Alternative title: Poverty and Income Inequality in Scotland

This data is provided by the measures known as 'absolute low income' and 'relative low income'. Relative low income measures families in low income for the reference year. Absolute low income measures families in low income relative to the base year of financial year-ending 2011, adjusted for inflation.

Out of all OECD countries, Cost Rica had the highest poverty rate as of 2022, at over 20 percent. The country with the second highest poverty rate was the United States, with 18 percent. On the other end of the scale, Czechia had the lowest poverty rate at 6.4 percent, followed by Denmark.

The significance of the OECD

The OECD, or the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, was founded in 1948 and is made up of 38 member countries. It seeks to improve the economic and social well-being of countries and their populations. The OECD looks at issues that impact people’s everyday lives and proposes policies that can help to improve the quality of life.

Poverty in the United States

In 2022, there were nearly 38 million people living below the poverty line in the U.S.. About one fourth of the Native American population lived in poverty in 2022, the most out of any ethnicity. In addition, the rate was higher among young women than young men. It is clear that poverty in the United States is a complex, multi-faceted issue that affects millions of people and is even more complex to solve.

This is the proportion of children aged under 16 (0-15) living in families in absolute low income during the year. The figures are based on the count of children aged under 16 (0-15) living in the area derived from ONS mid-year population estimates. The count of children refers to the age of the child at 30 June of each year.

Low income is a family whose equivalised income is below 60 per cent of median household incomes. Gross income measure is Before Housing Costs (BHC) and includes contributions from earnings, state support, and pensions. Equivalisation adjusts incomes for household size and composition, taking an adult couple with no children as the reference point. For example, the process of equivalisation would adjust the income of a single person upwards, so their income can be compared directly to the standard of living for a couple.

Absolute low income is income Before Housing Costs (BHC) in the reference year in comparison with incomes in 2010/11 adjusted for inflation. A family must have claimed one or more of Universal Credit, Tax Credits, or Housing Benefit at any point in the year to be classed as low income in these statistics. Children are dependent individuals aged under 16; or aged 16 to 19 in full-time non-advanced education. The count of children refers to the age of the child at 31 March of each year.

Data are calibrated to the Households Below Average Income (HBAI) survey regional estimates of children in low income but provide more granular local area information not available from the HBAI. For further information and methodology on the construction of these statistics, visit this link. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Data is Powered by LG Inform Plus and automatically checked for new data on the 3rd of each month.

In 2023, the around 11.1 percent of the population was living below the national poverty line in the United States. Poverty in the United StatesAs shown in the statistic above, the poverty rate among all people living in the United States has shifted within the last 15 years. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) defines poverty as follows: “Absolute poverty measures poverty in relation to the amount of money necessary to meet basic needs such as food, clothing, and shelter. The concept of absolute poverty is not concerned with broader quality of life issues or with the overall level of inequality in society.” The poverty rate in the United States varies widely across different ethnic groups. American Indians and Alaska Natives are the ethnic group with the most people living in poverty in 2022, with about 25 percent of the population earning an income below the poverty line. In comparison to that, only 8.6 percent of the White (non-Hispanic) population and the Asian population were living below the poverty line in 2022. Children are one of the most poverty endangered population groups in the U.S. between 1990 and 2022. Child poverty peaked in 1993 with 22.7 percent of children living in poverty in that year in the United States. Between 2000 and 2010, the child poverty rate in the United States was increasing every year; however,this rate was down to 15 percent in 2022. The number of people living in poverty in the U.S. varies from state to state. Compared to California, where about 4.44 million people were living in poverty in 2022, the state of Minnesota had about 429,000 people living in poverty.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner. The Millennium Survey of Poverty and Social Exclusion (PSE) was designed to update the Breadline Britain Surveys which were conducted by Mori in 1983 and 1990 (see also Gordon et al, Breadline Britain in the 1990s). Firstly, a representative sample of the population of Great Britain was asked for their views on what constitutes the necessities of life in present day Britain. This was done in June 1999 using the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Omnibus Survey. Secondly, a specially selected sample was drawn from respondents to the 1998/99 General Household Survey, and interviewed in detail about their circumstances and their views on a range of issues associated with poverty and social exclusion. This dataset is associated with the second aspect of the survey; the follow-up to the GHS, referred to as PSE. The aims of the PSE survey were: To update the Breadline Britain Surveys; To estimate the size of groups of households in different circumstances; To explore movement in and out of poverty; To look at age and gender difference in experiences of and responses to poverty. It is planned that a similar survey will be carried out in other countries. Main Topics: The main topics covered include housing, health, time poverty, social networks and support, necessities, finance and debts, intra-household poverty, poverty over time, absolute and overall poverty, area deprivation, local services, crime, child's school, perceptions of poverty, activism as well as some demographics and information on income. A Kish Grid was used (see documentation for further information) Face-to-face interview Compilation or synthesis of existing material The face-to-face interviewing was done using CAPI and the interview included a card-sorting exercise. A Computer Assisted Self Interviewing (CASI) module was used to collect answers to sensitive questions, such as those on crime. Where the respondent was reluctant or unable to complete the self-completion section on the laptop the interviewer asked the respondent's permission to ask these questions. Some data were also obtained for this study from the General Household Survey. 1999 ADOPTED CHILDREN ADULTS AGE ALCOHOL USE ALCOHOLIC DRINKS APARTMENTS APPRENTICESHIP ATTITUDES BANK ACCOUNTS BASIC NEEDS BATHROOMS BEDROOMS BONUS PAYMENTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING SOCIETY AC... BUSINESSES CARE OF DEPENDANTS CARE OF THE DISABLED CARE OF THE ELDERLY CENTRAL HEATING CEREMONIES CHILD BENEFITS CHILD CARE CHILD DAY CARE CHILDREN CHIROPODY CHRONIC ILLNESS CLEANING CLOTHING COHABITATION COLOUR TELEVISION R... COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS COMPACT DISC PLAYERS COMPANY CARS COMPUTERS CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES COOKING COSTS CRIME AND SECURITY DEBTS DENTISTS DEPRESSION DISABILITIES DISABLED PERSONS DISTANCE LEARNING DIVORCE DOMESTIC APPLIANCES DOMESTIC RESPONSIBI... ECONOMIC ACTIVITY EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND EDUCATIONAL COURSES EDUCATIONAL INSTITU... ELDERLY ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYERS EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT HISTORY ETHNIC GROUPS EXAMINATIONS EXPECTATION Equality FAMILIES FAMILY MEMBERS FATHER S PLACE OF B... FERTILITY FINANCIAL RESOURCES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOOD FOOD AND NUTRITION FOSSIL FUELS FOSTER CHILDREN FRIENDS FULL TIME EMPLOYMENT FURNISHED ACCOMMODA... FURTHER EDUCATION GAS SUPPLY GENDER GENERAL PRACTITIONERS Great Britain HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD HEALTH HEALTH CONSULTATIONS HEALTH SERVICES HEALTH VISITORS HEARING HEARING AIDS HEARING IMPAIRMENTS HEATING SYSTEMS HIGHER EDUCATION HOBBIES HOLIDAYS HOME BUYING HOME HELP HOME OWNERSHIP HOME SHARING HOME VISITS HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT... HOSPITAL SERVICES HOSPITALIZATION HOURS OF WORK HOUSEHOLD BUDGETS HOUSEHOLDS HOUSES HOUSEWORK HOUSING HOUSING AGE HOUSING FACILITIES HOUSING TENURE INCOME INSURANCE INTEREST FINANCE INTERNET INVESTMENT JOB HUNTING KITCHENS LANDLORDS LEISURE TIME ACTIVI... LOANS MANAGERS MARITAL HISTORY MARITAL STATUS MARRIAGE MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION MATERNITY PATIENTS MEALS ON WHEELS MEDICAL PRESCRIPTIONS MOBILE HOMES MORTGAGES MOTHER S PLACE OF B... MOTOR VEHICLES NEIGHBOURS NURSES OCCUPATIONAL PENSIONS OCCUPATIONAL QUALIF... OCCUPATIONAL TRAINING OCCUPATIONS ONE PARENT FAMILIES OPTICIANS OVERTIME PARENTS PART TIME COURSES PART TIME EMPLOYMENT PATIENTS PENSIONS PERSONAL DEBT REPAY... PERSONAL HYGIENE PHYSICIANS PLACE OF BIRTH POLICE SERVICES POVERTY PREGNANCY PRIVATE PERSONAL PE... PRIVATE SECTOR PROFESSIONAL CONSUL... PUBLIC HOUSES PUBLIC TRANSPORT QUALIFICATIONS REDUNDANCY PAY RENTED ACCOMMODATION RENTS RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY RETIREMENT ROOM SHARING ROOMS SANDWICH COURSES SATELLITE RECEIVERS SAVINGS SCHOOL LEAVING AGE SELF EMPLOYED SHARED HOME OWNERSHIP SHELTERED HOUSING SHOPPING SIBLINGS SICK PERSONS SMOKING SMOKING CESSATION SOCIAL DISADVANTAGE SOCIAL EXCLUSION SOCIAL HOUSING SOCIAL SECURITY BEN... SOCIAL SECURITY CON... SOCIAL SUPPORT SOCIAL WORKERS SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS SPORT SPOUSES STANDARD OF LIVING STATE RETIREMENT PE... STEPCHILDREN STERILIZATION MEDICAL STUDENTS SUBSIDIARY EMPLOYMENT SUPERVISORS Social behaviour an... Social conditions a... Specific social ser... TELEPHONES TELEVISION CHANNELS TELEVISION RECEIVERS TIED HOUSING TOBACCO TRAINING COURSES UNEMPLOYED UNEMPLOYMENT UNFURNISHED ACCOMMO... UNWAGED WORKERS VACANT HOUSING VIDEO RECORDERS VISION IMPAIRMENTS VISITS PERSONAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATIO... WAGES WALKING WATER SUPPLY WIDOWED inequality and soci...

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner. The aim of the research project was to monitor the changes in socio-economic and nutritional status of the same extreme poor Bangladeshi household members following income generating support programmes. Information on schooling, morbidity and employment was collected from all family members together with details of house ownership, house size and construction, access to cultivable land, electricity, water supply and sanitation. The number and size of loans, cash savings, income (both cash and in-kind), expenditure, household food intake and food coping strategies and social empowerment were also determined. Adults and children under five years of age had their height and weight measured annually and in adults Body Mass Index (weight in kg/height2 in metres) was calculated. In children height-for-age, weight-for-age and weight-for-height were determined based on World Health Organization standards. Both adults and children provided a finger prick of blood from which the haemoglobin concentration was measured. Six cohorts were recruited, cohort 1 in 2010 and was followed up 11 times, 3 surveys in both 2010 and 2011 and annually thereafter, cohort 2 recruited in 2011 and followed up 8 times, three surveys in 2011 and annually thereafter, Cohort 3 recruited in 2012 and followed up annually 5 times. Cohorts 4, 5 and 6 recruited in 2014 and followed up annually 3 times. Cohorts 1, 2, 4, and 6 comprised both rural and urban households while cohorts 3 and 5 were only rural. Rural cohorts came from all over the country while the urban cohorts were recruited from Dhaka slums. All cohorts were randomly selected and the total household sample size was 1856. The project was supported by UK Aid from the Department for International Development (DFID) and the Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation (SDC) in partnership with the Government of Bangladesh (GoB) to lift 1 million people out of extreme poverty by 2016.

Association between extreme poverty and lung function in children residing in India.