The classification of watercourses in the case law(1) is essentially based on the following two criteria: — the presence and permanence of a natural bed originally, distinguishing a watercourse from a canal or a ditch dug by the hand of man but including in the definition a natural watercourse originally made artificial, provided that it provides the proof; — the permanence of sufficient debit for most of the year assessed on a case-by-case basis by the court in accordance with local climatic and hydrological data and based on presumptions such as the indication of the “watercourse” on an IGN map or an indication of its name on the cadastre. In order to clarify which parts of the water system are to be considered as watercourses, the interdepartmental instruction of 3 June 2015 requested to establish, at the departmental level, a watercourse mapping and to develop a maintenance guide for river residents. The data entered are derived from the identification of ECs carried out by DDTM 34/SERN/PRNT in collaboration with ONEMA became AFB and the Chamber of Agriculture in 2016. Since then, this mapping has evolved to take into account the findings of the requests for expertise sent to DDTM 34 until 26 November 2018. At this date, a stabilised version is available for download in the Géocatalogue. The layer can be viewed in Cartélie: http://www.herault.gouv.fr/Politiques-publiques/Environnement-risques-naturels-et-technologiques/Eau/Determination-des-cours-d-eau

The transitional NVR map was prepared by Department Planning and Environment under Part 5A of the amended Local Land Services Act 2013 (LLS Act) and supporting regulation.\r \r On the 25th of August 2017 the transitional NVR Map was published under transitional arrangements set out in 60F of the LLS Act. \r \r The current published version of the transitional NVR Map (version 11) was published on 23 March 2022. The transitional NVR Map currently displays category 2 – vulnerable regulated land, category 2 – sensitive regulated land and land that is excluded from the LLS Act. The latest version of the map can be viewed online using the NVR Map Viewer . \r \r The transitional NVR Map has been developed to underpin the new land management framework. The transitional NVR Map essentially tells you where the land management code and allowable activities are either limited or not available.\r \r Understanding the map categories.\r \r Currently, the transitional NVR map viewer displays displays category 2 – vulnerable regulated land, category 2 – sensitive regulated land and land that is excluded from the LLS Act. Mapping for category 1 - exempt land and category 2- regulated land are yet to be published.\r \r Broadly, category 1 - exempt land is land that was cleared of native vegetation as at 1 January 1990, or land that was lawfully cleared between 1 January 1990 and 25 August 2017. Category 2 - regulated land is land that was not cleared as at 1 January 1990, was unlawfully cleared after 1 January 1990, or is a prescribed area with an identified environmental value. Land is mapped to each category on the basis of past clearing or disturbance events, as detected by satellite and aerial imagery, and updated land use data. Prescribed areas with an identified environmental value are mapped as category 2 - regulated land, overriding a category 1 - regulated land designation based on the mapping.\r \r Transitional NVR map – land categories and map the 6 colour code\r \r Category\tdefinition\r \r 1. Category 1 - exempt land (Blue)\r Unrestricted management (exempt). Rural lands where clearing of native vegetation is not regulated by Part 5A of the LLS Act 2013.This includes land cleared or significantly disturbed as at 1 January 1990 or lawfully cleared between that date and commencement of Part 5A of the LLS Act 2013. Other legislation may apply to category 1 - exempt land. \r \r 2. Category 2 - regulated land (Yellow)\r Code based management (regulated). Rural lands where clearing is regulated and can be carried out in accordance with Part 5A of the LLS Act 2013 or other legislation. This includes complying with the codes and allowable activities. Land not cleared as at 1 January 1990, land unlawfully cleared since 1 January 1990, and land subject to existing conservation obligations including remedial directions.\r \r 3. Category 2 - vulnerable regulated land (Orange)\r Regulated (vulnerable). Rural land where clearing of native vegetation is more restricted than on other category 2 land. This includes steep and highly erodible lands, riparian land and special category land (as declared). \r \r 4. Category 2 - sensitive regulated land (Pink)\r Regulated (sensitive). Rural land where clearing of native vegetation is more restricted than other category 2 land. This includes lands that are sensitive lands due to factors such as the presence of coastal wetlands, certain rainforests, core koala habitat, high conservation grasslands, critically endangered entities, land subject to conservation or incentive agreements or covenants and others. \r \r 5. Category 2 - sensitive and vulnerable regulated lands areas of overlap (Brown)\r This map class depicts land where category 2 vulnerable regulated land [(Vulnerable) - Orange] and category 2 - sensitive regulated [(Sensitive) - Pink] overlap.\r \r 6. Land excluded from the LLS Act - (Grey)\r Land not regulated by Part 5A of the LLS Act 2013. This land includes urban zones, environmental conservation zones and R5 large lot residential as gazetted under a Local Environment Plan (LEP). It also includes public conservation lands (such as National parks and State Forests) and number of entire councils in the Sydney metro area.\r \r Please refer to the Method Statement for more details https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Site/Documents/Animals-and-plants/Biodiversity/native-vegetation-regulatory-map-method-statement-170495.pdf?la=en&hash=7E4AF9410B2B65E1C5B2FFB6218AF502BB6989C3\r \r For more information on the transitional NVR map, updates, version history and contact for enquiries, please visit the transitional NVR Map web page:\r \r https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/topics/animals-and-plants/biodiversity/native-vegetation-regulatory-map

The transitional NVR map - land excluded from the LLS Act layer is a component of the transitional NVR map. The transitional NVR map was prepared by Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) under Part 5A of the Local Land Services Act 2013 (LLS Act) and supporting Local Land Services Regulation 2014.

Section 60A of the Local Land Service Act 2013 (LLS Act) identifies land where the regulatory framework for native vegetation clearing in rural areas does not apply. This land is mapped as Land Excluded from the LLS Act on the transitional NVR map.

The 2022 annual review of the transitional NVR map was published on 23 March 2022. Please read below for details of land types included in the transitional NVR map - land excluded from the LLS Act layer and changes occurring as a result of the 2022 Annual Review. The latest version of the map can be viewed online using the transitional NVR Map Viewer

Land excluded from the LLS Act listed under Section 60A of the LLS Act includes:

• Urban areas under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017, including 33 local government areas and 22 listed local environmental plan zones under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
• National Park estate and other conservation areas
• State forestry land.
• Crown Reserves; land dedicated or reserved under the Crown Lands Act 1989
• Interim Heritage order or listing on the State Heritage Register under the Heritage Act 1977
• Lord Howe Island

Changes to the transitional NVR map - land excluded from the LLS Act layer arising from the 2021 Annual Review include:

• Environmental Planning Instrument (EPI) land zoning – updates to land excluded from the LLS Act as a result of changes to land zoning for some local government areas.

• National Park, State Forest and Crown Land Estate Updates to land excluded from the LLS Act as a result of changes to the National Park, State Forest and Crown Land Estates

A complete list of lands excluded from the LLS Act can be found in the Native Vegetation Regulatory Map - Method statement found: https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Site/Documents/Animals-and-plants/Biodiversity/native-vegetation-regulatory-map-method-statement-220033.pdf

All spatial data sets compiled for the transitional NVR lands excluded from the LLS Act layer are held within databases maintained by NSW Government.

Data on the transitional NVR viewer is updated on a monthly basis for Landholder initiated Map Reviews and other minor data changes. https://www.lmbc.nsw.gov.au/Maps/index.html?viewer=NVRMap

Please contact Department of Planning and Environment data broker on data.broker@environment.nsw.gov.au for additional information.

This record is now superseded. The current record for ‘Transitional – Excluded Land' can be viewed here. The Excluded Land layer is a component of the Native Vegetation Regulatory Map (NVR Map). NVR …Show full descriptionThis record is now superseded. The current record for ‘Transitional – Excluded Land' can be viewed here. The Excluded Land layer is a component of the Native Vegetation Regulatory Map (NVR Map). NVR Map was prepared by Department of Planning Industry and Environment (DPIE) under Part 5A of the Local Land Services Act 2013 (LLS Act) and supporting Local Land Services Regulation 2014. Section 60A of the Local Land Service Act 2013 (LLS Act) identifies land where the regulatory framework for native vegetation clearing in rural areas does not apply. This land is mapped as Excluded Land on the Native Vegetation Regulation Map (NVR Map). The 2019 Annual Review of the transitional NVR map was published on 22 November 2019. Please read below for details about changes occurring as a result of the 2019 Annual Review. The latest version of the map can be viewed online using the NVR Map Viewer Excluded land listed under Section 60A of the LLS Act includes: Urban areas under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017, including 33 local government areas and 22 listed local environmental plan zones under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. National Park estate and other conservation areas State forestry land. Crown Reserves; land dedicated or reserved under the Crown Lands Act 1989 Interim Heritage order or listing on the State Heritage Register under the Heritage Act 1977 Lord Howe Island Complete list of Excluded Lands can be found in the Native Vegetation Regulatory Map - Method statement found: https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Site/Documents/Animals-and-plants/Biodiversity/native-vegetation-regulatory-map-method-statement-170495.pdf All spatial data sets compiled for the excluded land layer are held within databases maintained by NSW Government. Data on the NVR viewer is updated on a monthly basis for Landholder initiated Map Reviews and other minor data changes. https://www.lmbc.nsw.gov.au/Maps/index.html?viewer=NVRMap Data available for download was last updated on 25th May 2020. Please contact Department of Planning Industry and Environment data broker on data.broker@environment.nsw.gov.au for additional information.

National Monuments Service - Archaeological Survey of Ireland. Published by Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage. Available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY-4.0).This Archaeological Survey of Ireland dataset is published from the database of the National Monuments Service Sites and Monuments Record (SMR). This dataset also can be viewed and interrogated through the online Historic Environment Viewer: https://heritagedata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=0c9eb9575b544081b0d296436d8f60f8

A Sites and Monuments Record (SMR) was issued for all counties in the State between 1984 and 1992. The SMR is a manual containing a numbered list of certain and possible monuments accompanied by 6-inch Ordnance Survey maps (at a reduced scale). The SMR formed the basis for issuing the Record of Monuments and Places (RMP) - the statutory list of recorded monuments established under Section 12 of the National Monuments (Amendment) Act 1994. The RMP was issued for each county between 1995 and 1998 in a similar format to the existing SMR. The RMP differs from the earlier lists in that, as defined in the Act, only monuments with known locations or places where there are believed to be monuments are included.

The large Archaeological Survey of Ireland archive and supporting database are managed by the National Monuments Service and the records are continually updated and supplemented as additional monuments are discovered. On the Historic Environment viewer an area around each monument has been shaded, the scale of which varies with the class of monument. This area does not define the extent of the monument, nor does it define a buffer area beyond which ground disturbance should not take place – it merely identifies an area of land within which it is expected that the monument will be located. It is not a constraint area for screening – such must be set by the relevant authority who requires screening for their own purposes. This data has been released for download as Open Data under the DPER Open Data Strategy and is licensed for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Please note that the centre point of each record is not indicative of the geographic extent of the monument. The existing point centroids were digitised relative to the OSI 6-inch mapping and the move from this older IG-referenced series to the larger-scale ITM mapping will necessitate revisions. The accuracy of the derived ITM co-ordinates is limited to the OS 6-inch scale and errors may ensue should the user apply the co-ordinates to larger scale maps. Records that do not refer to 'monuments' are designated 'Redundant record' and are retained in the archive as they may relate to features that were once considered to be monuments but which on investigation proved otherwise. Redundant records may also refer to duplicate records or errors in the data structure of the Archaeological Survey of Ireland.

This dataset is provided for re-use in a number of ways and the technical options are outlined below. For a live and current view of the data, please use the web services or the data extract tool in the Historic Environment Viewer. The National Monuments Service also provide an Open Data snapshot of its national dataset in CSV as a bulk data download. Users should consult the National Monument Service website https://www.archaeology.ie/ for further information and guidance on the National Monument Act(s) and the legal significance of this dataset.

Open Data Bulk Data Downloads (version date: 23/08/2023)

The Sites and Monuments Record (SMR) is provided as a national download in Comma Separated Value (CSV) format. This format can be easily integrated into a number of software clients for re-use and analysis. The Longitude and Latitude coordinates are also provided to aid its re-use in web mapping systems, however, the ITM easting/northings coordinates should be quoted for official purposes. ERSI Shapefiles of the SMR points and SMRZone polygons are also available The SMRZones represent an area around each monument, the scale of which varies with the class of monument. This area does not define the extent of the monument, nor does it define a buffer area beyond which ground disturbance should not take place – it merely identifies an area of land within which it is expected that the monument will be located. It is not a constraint area for screening – such must be set by the relevant authority who requires screening for their own purposes.

GIS Web Service APIs (live views):

For users with access to GIS software please note that the Archaeological Survey of Ireland data is also available spatial data web services. By accessing and consuming the web service users are deemed to have accepted the Terms and Conditions. The web services are available at the URL endpoints advertised below:

SMR; https://services-eu1.arcgis.com/HyjXgkV6KGMSF3jt/arcgis/rest/services/SMROpenData/FeatureServer

SMRZone; https://services-eu1.arcgis.com/HyjXgkV6KGMSF3jt/arcgis/rest/services/SMRZoneOpenData/FeatureServer

Historic Environment Viewer - Query Tool

The "Query" tool can alternatively be used to selectively filter and download the data represented in the Historic Environment Viewer. The instructions for using this tool in the Historic Environment Viewer are detailed in the associated Help file: https://www.archaeology.ie/sites/default/files/media/pdf/HEV_UserGuide_v01.pdf...

Area exposed to one or more hazards represented on the hazard map used for risk analysis of the RPP. The hazard map is the result of the study of hazards, the objective of which is to assess the intensity of each hazard at any point in the study area. The evaluation method is specific to each hazard type. It leads to the delimitation of a set of areas on the study perimeter constituting a zoning graduated according to the level of the hazard. The assignment of a hazard level at a given point in the territory takes into account the probability of occurrence of the dangerous phenomenon and its degree of intensity.For PPRTs the hazard levels are determined by effect effect on maps by type of effect and overall on an aggregated level on a synthesis map.All hazard areas represented on the hazard map are included. Areas protected by protective structures must be represented (possibly in a specific way) as they are always considered to be subject to hazard (cases of breakage or inadequacy of the structure).The hazard zones may be classified as data compiled in so far as they result from a synthesis using several sources of calculated, modelled or observed hazard data. These source data are not covered by this class of objects but by another standard dealing with the knowledge of hazards.Some areas of the study perimeter are considered “zero or insignificant hazard zones”. These are the areas where the hazard has been studied and is nil. These areas are not included in the object class and do not have to be represented as hazard zones.

This digital soil landscape product contains natural resource mapping for the Australian Capital Territory. The project was funded by the ACT Government to enhance knowledge of soils, landscapes and physical constraints to land use in the urban and rural environment. The information will assist in informed decision making, planning and environmental modelling throughout the catchment. Fifty-five soil landscape map units have been described for the ACT. Each unit is an inventory of soil and landscape information with relatively uniform land management requirements, allowing major soil and landscape qualities and constraints to be identified. Soils are described using the Australian Soil Classification and the Great Soil Groups systems. Related datasets: Part of this area is also covered by the Soil Landscape 1:100 000 mapping series for the mapsheets of Canberra and Michelago. Online Maps: This and related datasets can be viewed using eSPADE (NSW’s soil spatial viewer), which contains a suite of soil and landscape information including soil profile data. Many of these datasets have hot-linked soil reports. An alternative viewer is the SEED Map; an ideal way to see what other natural resources datasets (e.g. vegetation) are available for this map area. Reference: NSW Office of Environment and Heritage & ACT Government (2016) Soil and Land Resources of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney.

This data set contains the Submerged Lands Act (SLA)boundary line (also known as the State Seaward Boundary (SSB) and Fed State Boundary) for the BOEM Pacific Region in ESRI ArcGIS shape file format. The SLA defines the seaward limit of a state owned submerged lands and the landward boundary of federally managed Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) lands. In the BOEM Pacific Region the SLA is projected 3 nautical miles offshore from the coastal baseline. Further information on the SLA and development of this line from baseline points can be found in OCS Report BOEM 99-0006: Boundary Development on the Outer Continental Shelf. The SLA boundary was developed using nautical charts, topographic maps, and hydrographic surveys to identify coastal baseline points. For California, there was a wide range of map scales used (1:200 – 1:100,000). The Minerals Management Service (MMS - the predecessor bureau to BOEM) used mapping software that was developed in-house to mathematically project the SLA boundary 3 nautical miles seaward from the baseline. For purposes of the SLA, all coordinates are assumed as absolute values with a precision of three decimals of a meter. For purposes other than the SLA, the actual positional precision for a scale of 1:40,000 is approximately 23 meters. In 1992, MMS adopted NADCON v.2.00 or better as the bureau standard horizontal datum transformation software, and reiterated that, for its purposes, “the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS 84) is considered equivalent to NAD 83 offshore of Alaska and the conterminous United States.” 57 Fed. Reg. 5168 (February 12, 1992). On December 24, 2014, the SLA boundary offshore of California was fixed (permanently immobilized) by a decree issued by the U.S. Supreme Court. United States v. California, 135 S. Ct. 563 (2014). For a detailed discussion on the fixing of the SLA boundary for California, please see http://www.boem.gov/Oil-and-Gas-Energy-Program/Mapping-and-Data/Multi-Purpose-Marine-Cadastre-Map-Viewer/Court-Decisions.aspx Because GIS projection and topology functions can change or generalize coordinates, these GIS shape files are NOT an OFFICIAL record for the exact Submerged Lands Act Boundary.The official record is reflected through the coordinates listed in the decree, and the boundary shown on the BOEM Supplemental Official Block Diagrams, which are available at http://www.boem.gov/Oil-and-Gas-Energy-Program/Mapping-and-Data/Pacific.aspx

Generally speaking, the stakes are people, property, activities, cultural or environmental heritage elements, threatened by a hazard and likely to be affected or damaged by it. The sensitivity of an issue to a hazard is called “vulnerability”. This object class brings together all the issues that have been addressed in the RPP study. An issue is a dated object whose consideration depends on the purpose of the RPP and its vulnerability to the hazards studied. A PPR issue can therefore be considered (or not) depending on the type or types of hazard being addressed. These elements form the basis of knowledge of the land cover necessary for the development of the RPP, in or near the study area, at the time of the analysis of the issues. The data on issues represent a (figible and non-exhaustive) photograph of assets and individuals exposed to hazards at the time of the development of the risk prevention plan. This data is not updated after approval of the RPP. In practice they are no longer used: the issues are recalculated as necessary with up-to-date data sources.

The classification as a watercourse concerns the application of Articles L.214-1 to L.214-6 of the Environmental Code and is based on the three cumulative criteria of the definition of watercourses in the case-law of the Conseil d’État of 21 October 2011: — the presence and permanence of a bed, which was originally natural (i.e. distinguishing a stream from a canal or a ditch dug by the hand of man but including in the definition a natural stream originally made artificial, subject to proof); — a sufficient flow rate for most of the year (appraised on a case-by-case basis by the judge on the basis of local climatic and hydrological data and on the basis of presumptions such as the indication of the “watercourse” on an IGN map or the mention of its name on the cadastre); — power from a source. Warning: the information that must be read before consulting this layer is available on the website of the State Services in the Nièvre — (Public policies — Environment — Water) http://www.nievre.gouv.fr/cartographie-des-cours-d-eau-a1863.html

This data has now been superseded, please go to https://datasets.seed.nsw.gov.au/dataset/nvr-map-excluded-land-transitional2022 for the most current NVR Data\r \r \r ********************************************************************************************\r \r \r The transitional NVR map - land excluded from the LLS Act layer is a component of the transitional NVR map. The transitional NVR map was prepared by Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) under Part 5A of the Local Land Services Act 2013 (LLS Act) and supporting Local Land Services Regulation 2014.\r \r Section 60A of the Local Land Service Act 2013 (LLS Act) identifies land where the regulatory framework for native vegetation clearing in rural areas does not apply. \r This land is mapped as Land Excluded from the LLS Act on the transitional NVR map.\r \r The 2021 annual review of the transitional NVR map was published on 26 March 2021. Please read below for details of land types included in the transitional NVR map - land excluded from the LLS Act layer and changes occurring as a result of the 2021 Annual Review. The latest version of the map can be viewed online using the transitional NVR Map Viewer \r \r Land excluded from the LLS Act listed under Section 60A of the LLS Act includes:\r \r -\tUrban areas under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017, including 33 local government areas and 22 listed local environmental plan zones under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.\r -\tNational Park estate and other conservation areas\r -\tState forestry land.\r - Crown Reserves; land dedicated or reserved under the Crown Lands Act 1989\r - Interim Heritage order or listing on the State Heritage Register under the Heritage Act 1977\r - Lord Howe Island\r \r Changes to the transitional NVR map - land excluded from the LLS Act layer arising from the 2021 Annual Review include:\r \r - Environmental Planning Instrument (EPI) land zoning – updates to land excluded from the LLS Act as a result of changes to land zoning for some local government areas.\r \r - National Park, State Forest and Crown Land Estate\r Updates to land excluded from the LLS Act as a result of changes to the National Park, State Forest and Crown Land Estates\r \r \r A complete list of lands excluded from the LLS Act can be found in the Native Vegetation Regulatory Map - Method statement found:\r https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/-/media/OEH/Corporate-Site/Documents/Animals-and-plants/Biodiversity/native-vegetation-regulatory-map-method-statement-170495.pdf\r \r All spatial data sets compiled for the transitional NVR lands excluded from the LLS Act layer are held within databases maintained by NSW Government. \r \r Data on the transitional NVR viewer is updated on a monthly basis for Landholder initiated Map Reviews and other minor data changes. https://www.lmbc.nsw.gov.au/Maps/index.html?viewer=NVRMap\r \r \r Please contact Department of Planning and Environment data broker on data.broker@environment.nsw.gov.au for additional information.\r

The Bolstering Ecosystems Against Coastal Harm Act (BEACH Act, Pub. L.118-117) was enacted on November 25, 2024. This law amended the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) and adopted 195 new or revised maps for 454 units of the CBRS in 13 states. The revised maps were produced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) through the Hurricane Sandy Remapping Project and other efforts and are available through the CBRS Mapper.

The revised maps remove about 1,400 acres from the CBRS, correcting mapping errors affecting about 955 structures. The revised maps also expand the CBRS by about 294,000 acres and add 275 structures to the CBRS. The revised maps reclassify certain areas from System Units to Otherwise Protected Areas and vice versa. Learn more about the differences between these two types of units. This web map is a component of the FWS BEACH Act viewer, which allows users to see where these changes were made. The change polygons in this layer are a visualization tool only and may include some errors, such as:

Offshore areas depicted as either “additions” or “removals” where we altered the length of the boundaries where they extend into bodies of water. These are not actual changes, as the offshore extent of the units is not defined by the polygons, but by either the 30- or 20-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the area).

Minor topological differences that occur in the nationwide dataset that did not exist in the locally projected data (these errors are imperceptible except through geoprocessing).For more information, including summaries of the changes made to each unit, visit our webpage on the BEACH Act.

Users seeking documentation regarding whether a particular property is within or outside of the CBRS should use the CBRS Validation Tool rather than this web map. Questions? Contact cbra@fws.gov.

This dataset contains the boundaries at the different stages of the development of the PPRT. The characteristic of these perimeters is to be the consequence of an official act and to produce their effects from a specified date. This is the following: — prescribed scope contained in the prescription order of a PPR (natural or technological); — scope of risk exposure that corresponds to the scope regulated by the approved RPP. This approved perimeter is a utility easement (PM3 for PPRTs); — scope of study which corresponds to the envelope in which the hazards were studied.

Mountain area under the Law of 9 January 1985 known as the “Mountain Law” as amended by Act No. 2005-157 of 23 February 2005 on the development of rural territories:

The Water Quality Planning Act, N.J.S.A. 58:11A-1 et seq. authorizes the Governor to designate areawide planning agencies for the purpose of developing, adopting, updating and amending Areawide Water Quality Management Plans (AWQMPs). In 1997, the Monmouth County Board of Chosen Freeholders became the Designated Planning Agency for Monmouth County (Whitman Executive Order 67). The Board of Chosen Freeholders delegated operational responsibilities to the Monmouth County Planning Board, who in turn created the Amendment Review Committee (ARC) to process and review proposed changes to the Monmouth County AWQMP in order to increase the speed and efficiency with which amendments could be processed. There are several aspects to areawide water quality management planning. The focus in Monmouth County has primarily been wastewater and stormwater management planning.

Generally speaking, the stakes are people, property, activities, cultural or environmental heritage elements, threatened by a hazard and likely to be affected or damaged by it. The sensitivity of an issue to a hazard is called “vulnerability”. This object class brings together all the issues that have been addressed in the RPP study. An issue is a dated object whose consideration depends on the purpose of the RPP and its vulnerability to the hazards studied. A PPR issue can therefore be considered (or not) depending on the type or types of hazard being addressed. These elements form the basis of knowledge of the land cover necessary for the development of the RPP, in or near the study area, at the time of the analysis of the issues. The data on issues represent a (figible and non-exhaustive) photograph of assets and individuals exposed to hazards at the time of the development of the risk prevention plan. This data is not updated after approval of the RPP. In practice they are no longer used: the issues are recalculated as necessary with up-to-date data sources.

This map contains district-based ACT canopy cover polygons at 1m resolution (vegetation cover above 3m) as at April/May 2020, detected with Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). The full ACT vector dataset has been split into districts and 1km tiles to allow for easier viewing.WARNING: Due to complexity and high resolution this dataset may draw slowly or appear to miss some trees. For best results, zoom in, view single districts separately, or download a local copy.LIDAR data was acquired in April/May 2020 for the ACT under contract by Aerometrex, at an average resolution of 12ppm. LiDAR is classified to Level 3 (for ground) and delivered as LAS v1.4 in in GDA2020 MGA zone 55. Visit https://www.planning.act.gov.au/professionals/survey-spatial/spatial-information/lidar-data for more info. Processing was completed on the LAS GDA2020 MGA Zone 55 LAS tile set using AHD vertical datum at 1m resolution. Dataset represents high vegetation above 3m (tree canopy or tree-approximate objects - see caveats).Methodology:High noise errors were reclassified.Digital Surface Model (DSM) and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) surfaces were created using ArcPro 2.8 LAS Dataset Geoprocessing Tools at 1 m resolution.Canopy Height Model CHM was determined = Digital Surface Model (DSM) - Digital Elevation Model (DEM).Pits (empty cells inside tree canopies) of 2 pixel (2x1m) were removed using Nibble.An ACT Urban building footprint layer generated from the 2020 LIDAR dataset by Aerometrex was used to remove spurious canopy portions from building roof areas in the urban area.An NDVI layer from pan-sharpened Pleiades multispectral satellite imagery, acquired in April 2019 (the Uriarra area) and November 2019 (rest of Urban Area) was used to delete erroneous non-vegetative surfaces in urban areas.Canopy holes <=1m2 were filled by Eliminate tool.GDA2020 MGA Zone 55.Tree canopy lower than 3m were removed. Converted to a binary raster, then converted to vector.Other available datasets: ACT 2020 Canopy Height Model (raster), ACT Trees (Individual Delineated Trees with Height) (vector), DEM, DSM, Contours, Building Footprints (© Australian Capital Territory & Aerometrex Limited), ACT Permeability, shrub cover - contact spatialdata@act.gov.au. Full LAS Tile sets can also be obtained in the following vertical datums: GDA2020 ellipsoidal, AHD, AVWS - see https://elevation.fsdf.org.au/. Other derivative products (including other canopy products) are available on request or through the ACT Geospatial Data Catalogue.Road, Block and Division Canopy 2020 Statistics also available here: https://actmapi-actgov.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/act-canopy-cover-2020-statistics/aboutCaveats:1. Please note that most (if not all) CHM-based tree delineation results should be thought of as "tree-approximate objects", and not actual trees. 2. Although every effort was made to remove any erroneous polygons (such as street lights, back yard fences and powerlines), there are likely to be some errors remaining.Creative Commons by Attribution (CCBY) 4.0 (Australian Capital Territory). Any sharing, adaption/transformation and value adding, including commercial use should be attributed to ACT Government (Australian Capital Territory). This dataset has been created from the original LiDAR capture and classification © Australian Capital Territory & Aerometrex Limited 2020.How to cite this data: ACT Government (2020) (Botha, H). ACT Canopy Cover 1m 2020. Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate (EPSDD), ACT Government. Canberra, ACT. Accessed via ACT Geospatial Data Catalogue.

This map contains district-based ACT canopy cover polygons at 1m resolution (vegetation cover above 3m) as at April/May 2020, detected with Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR). The full ACT vector dataset has been split into districts and 1km tiles to allow for easier viewing.WARNING: Due to complexity and high resolution this dataset may draw slowly or appear to miss some trees. For best results, zoom in, view single districts separately, or download a local copy.LIDAR data was acquired in April/May 2020 for the ACT under contract by Aerometrex, at an average resolution of 12ppm. LiDAR is classified to Level 3 (for ground) and delivered as LAS v1.4 in in GDA2020 MGA zone 55. Visit https://www.planning.act.gov.au/professionals/survey-spatial/spatial-information/lidar-data for more info. Processing was completed on the LAS GDA2020 MGA Zone 55 LAS tile set using AHD vertical datum at 1m resolution. Dataset represents high vegetation above 3m (tree canopy or tree-approximate objects - see caveats).Methodology:High noise errors were reclassified.Digital Surface Model (DSM) and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) surfaces were created using ArcPro 2.8 LAS Dataset Geoprocessing Tools at 1 m resolution.Canopy Height Model CHM was determined = Digital Surface Model (DSM) - Digital Elevation Model (DEM).Pits (empty cells inside tree canopies) of 2 pixel (2x1m) were removed using Nibble.An ACT Urban building footprint layer generated from the 2020 LIDAR dataset by Aerometrex was used to remove spurious canopy portions from building roof areas in the urban area.An NDVI layer from pan-sharpened Pleiades multispectral satellite imagery, acquired in April 2019 (the Uriarra area) and November 2019 (rest of Urban Area) was used to delete erroneous non-vegetative surfaces in urban areas.Canopy holes <=1m2 were filled by Eliminate tool.GDA2020 MGA Zone 55.Tree canopy lower than 3m were removed. Converted to a binary raster, then converted to vector.Other available datasets: ACT 2020 Canopy Height Model (raster), ACT Trees (Individual Delineated Trees with Height) (vector), DEM, DSM, Contours, Building Footprints (© Australian Capital Territory & Aerometrex Limited), ACT Permeability, shrub cover - contact spatialdata@act.gov.au. Full LAS Tile sets can also be obtained in the following vertical datums: GDA2020 ellipsoidal, AHD, AVWS - see https://elevation.fsdf.org.au/. Other derivative products (including other canopy products) are available on request or through the ACT Geospatial Data Catalogue.Road, Block and Division Canopy 2020 Statistics also available here: https://actmapi-actgov.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/act-canopy-cover-2020-statistics/aboutCaveats:1. Please note that most (if not all) CHM-based tree delineation results should be thought of as "tree-approximate objects", and not actual trees. 2. Although every effort was made to remove any erroneous polygons (such as street lights, back yard fences and powerlines), there are likely to be some errors remaining.Creative Commons by Attribution (CCBY) 4.0 (Australian Capital Territory). Any sharing, adaption/transformation and value adding, including commercial use should be attributed to ACT Government (Australian Capital Territory). This dataset has been created from the original LiDAR capture and classification © Australian Capital Territory & Aerometrex Limited 2020.How to cite this data: ACT Government (2020) (Botha, H). ACT Canopy Cover 1m 2020. Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate (EPSDD), ACT Government. Canberra, ACT. Accessed via ACT Geospatial Data Catalogue.

The classification of watercourses in the case law(1) is essentially based on the following two criteria: — the presence and permanence of a natural bed originally, distinguishing a watercourse from a canal or a ditch dug by the hand of man but including in the definition a natural stream originally made artificial, subject to proof of this; — the permanence of a sufficient flow for most of the year assessed on a case-by-case basis by the judge on the basis of local climatic and hydrological data and on the basis of presumptions such as the indication of the ‘watercourse’ on an IGN map or the mention of its name on the cadastre. 1: This 22 Feb. 1980 M. FORFILLET req. Nos 15516 and 15517

Post rendered void (Article 135 of the Alur Act). Back to the RNU since 01/01/2016. The regulated zoning of the land use plan (POS) is digitised in accordance with the national requirements of the CNIG. In a SOP there are two main types of restricted zones: urban areas (U) and natural areas (N). These areas shall be demarcated on one or more graphic documents. A regulation is attached to each area. The by-law may lay down different rules, depending on whether the purpose of the construction relates to housing, hotel accommodation, offices, commerce, crafts, industry, agricultural or forestry operations or warehouse functions. Zones U and N are themselves divided according to existing or future developments. Thus in urban areas: — the UA areas indicate ancient urbanisation and dense tissue; — the UB areas a recent urbanisation with mainly collective housing; — UC areas a recent urbanisation but with pavilion habitat; — the UJ zones the various areas of activity of the municipality. With regard to natural areas: — the NA areas are referred to as future urbanisation, i.e. they can be developed at a later stage; — NB areas are natural areas partially serviced by equipment and in which constructions exist, but no further development is planned; — NC zones represent natural areas protected because of the agricultural value of the land or the richness of the soil or/or subsoil; finally, the ND areas are natural areas to protect either the quality of the sites or because there are nuisances or risks.