Newly imposed import tariffs in the United States were estimated to reach an average of 13.1 percent in 2025. Earlier that year, President Trump imposed tariffs on various goods and trading partners such as China, Canada and Mexico. This considerably increased the average tariff rate by 10.6 percentage points compared to the previous year. This marks the highest average rate in the United States since 1941.

This dataset presents country-level tariff rates charged to the United States during the Trump administration, alongside discounted reciprocal tariffs the U.S. might have charged in return. It highlights the trade imbalances and protectionist policies in place at the time. Useful for trade policy analysis, political science research, and data visualization. The values were originally expressed in decimal format (e.g., 0.10 = 10%) but have been converted to percentage format for clarity. 📊 Column Descriptions ..Country The name of the country or economic union (e.g., China, European Union).

..Tariffs charged to the USA (%) The average tariff percentage imposed by each country on goods imported from the United States.

..U.S.A. Discounted Reciprocal Tariffs (%) Hypothetical reciprocal tariff rates the U.S. would charge if it applied the same discount factor used by the other country toward the U.S.

United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: All Products data was reported at 1.670 % in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.690 % for 2015. United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: All Products data is updated yearly, averaging 1.960 % from Dec 1989 (Median) to 2016, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.950 % in 1992 and a record low of 1.540 % in 2007. United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: All Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Trade Tariffs. Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

As of August 2025, the United States reissued new tariffs for the Middle East and North African region. Initially on April 9, 2025, the United States levied a revised baseline of ** percent on all goods imported from countries of the Middle East and North Africa. The current tariff from August 7, is closer based on the initial tariff calculation of April 3, the rates of imported goods would have varied by country in the region, with Syria and Iraq at ** and ** percent, respectively. Tariffs and their effects he intertwined nature of global trade and supply chains implies that the shockwaves of significant policy changes and economic turbulences spread more easily across countries. This was illustrated in the effects of new United States tariffs on Arab countries, where projections show a *** percent decrease in investments in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Meanwhile, the impact of these tariffs on the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) imports forecast a ** percent decrease in imports from the United States to the Arab region. Middle East-United States trade relations The nature of trade relationships between the United States and the Middle East is often influenced by geopolitical and security realities, with Israel, UAE, and Saudi Arabia being the leading bilateral trading partners. A particularly strong trade relationship exists between the GCC countries and the United States, evident in the value of exports from the former to the latter. On the other hand, the value of exports from the broader Arab region to the United States fell considerably in the last decade, largely due to petroleum and oil revenue decrease.

United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: All Products data was reported at 2.870 % in 2016. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.870 % for 2015. United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: All Products data is updated yearly, averaging 3.530 % from Dec 1989 (Median) to 2016, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.310 % in 1991 and a record low of 2.870 % in 2016. United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: All Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Trade Tariffs. Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs.; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

This dataset provides values for TARIFF RATE MOST FAVORED NATION SIMPLE MEAN PRIMARY PRODUCTS PERCENT WB DATA.HTML reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

Trump_Tariff_Data

This dataset compiles key data points related to the impact and policy measures surrounding U.S. tariffs proposed or implemented by Donald Trump, particularly during the 2024 campaign and policy forecast period. It includes economic and trade metrics that provide context on U.S. trade balances, tariffs, and their international implications.

📁 Files & Structure

The dataset is divided into two main data tables:

📊 Data 1: Country-Level Trade & Tariff Overview

📈 Data 2: Tariff Policy Events & Economic Impact

💡 Use Cases

• Analyze the economic and geopolitical impact of tariff policies
• Forecast inflation or GDP shifts due to trade measures
• Build visual dashboards to compare U.S. trade relations by country
• Study election-cycle economic strategies and their global implications

Let us know if you create something cool using this dataset!

President Trump's proposals to impose universal tariffs as well as tariffs on Chinese, Canadian, and Mexican imports would considerably increase the average tariff rate. It's estimated that, if put into effect, the average tariff rate including dutiable imports would reach almost 18 percent, up from two percent in 2024. Tariff rates are higher when dutiable imports are included because they refer only to goods that are actually subject to tariffs, rather than all imports. This skews the average tariff rate upward because it excludes duty-free goods. Trump's proposal for a universal 10 percent tariff on all imports would impose a flat tax on all imports, rather than just dutiable goods. This would result in a sharp increase in the overall tariff burden because previously duty-free goods would be taxed.

As of July 31, 2025, the United States implemented a new set of reciprocal tariff rates on imports from ASEAN member states, following President Trump’s trade directive aimed at reducing the U.S. trade deficit. These tariffs varied by country and were based on bilateral trade imbalances and negotiation outcomes. Countries such as Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines successfully reached partial trade agreements with the U.S., resulting in moderate tariff rates of 19%–20%. In contrast, Laos and Myanmar, which lacked negotiated arrangements, faced maximum rates of 40%, reflecting their limited trade concessions. Brunei was assigned a 25% rate, while Cambodia received 19% under a separate designation. Singapore, which maintained a U.S. trade surplus, was subject only to the baseline 10% tariff.

United States US: Share of Tariff Lines with Specific Rates: Primary Products data was reported at 2.760 % in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.785 % for 2015. United States US: Share of Tariff Lines with Specific Rates: Primary Products data is updated yearly, averaging 2.713 % from Dec 1989 (Median) to 2016, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.650 % in 1993 and a record low of 0.023 % in 1997. United States US: Share of Tariff Lines with Specific Rates: Primary Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Trade Tariffs. Share of tariff lines with specific rates is the share of lines in the tariff schedule that are set on a per unit basis or that combine ad valorem and per unit rates. It shows the extent to which countries use tariffs based on physical quantities or other, non-ad valorem measures. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database.; ;

Actual value and historical data chart for European Union Tariff Rate Applied Weighted Mean All Products Percent

Access official WTO tariff and trade data for over 170 economies. Compare tariffs, imports, exports, and access downloadable data.

This dataset presents adjusted reciprocal tariff rates imposed by the United States on imported goods from various countries and territories. It reflects the further modifications made under U.S. trade policy measures aimed at responding to non-reciprocal or discriminatory tariff practices by trade partners. The adjustments are based on the principle of reciprocity—aligning tariffs with those that the partner countries impose on U.S. exports. ***Remark: In certain cases, it includes conditional adjustments such as: “0%” for zero-rate response to high tariffs.“15% minus Column 1 Duty Rate” for dynamically adjusted rates based on existing duties

As of March 11, 2025, Canada is expected to be the country most impacted by the planned 25 percent tariffs on U.S. imports of steel and aluminum, with a projected drop in its real gross domestic product (GDP) of around **** percent. Aside from China's real GDP, which is forecast to remain stable in the short-run, all other countries and regions analyzed are estimated to be negatively impacted by the tariffs to some extent.

Graph and download economic data for Federal government current tax receipts: Taxes on production and imports: Customs duties (B235RC1Q027SBEA) from Q1 1959 to Q2 2025 about receipts, imports, tax, federal, production, government, GDP, and USA.

This dataset is the current 2025 Harmonized Tariff Schedule plus all revisions for the current year. It provides the applicable tariff rates and statistical categories for all merchandise imported into the United States; it is based on the international Harmonized System, the global system of nomenclature that is used to describe most world trade in goods.

According to new estimations, if the 2025 tariffs were to remain in place, Canada would suffer the most significant long-term shock, with estimates showing a **** percent point drop in their real GDP.

Historical dataset showing North America tariff rates by year from N/A to N/A.

Actual value and historical data chart for China Tariff Rate Most Favored Nation Simple Mean All Products Percent

Historical dataset showing Virgin Islands (U.S.) tariff rates by year from N/A to N/A.