15 datasets found
  1. a

    Parcels

    • adams-county-open-data-portal-adams-county-wi.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Feb 18, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Adams County Land Information (2022). Parcels [Dataset]. https://adams-county-open-data-portal-adams-county-wi.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/parcels-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Adams County Land Information
    Area covered
    Description

    The Adams County Parcel Database was derived from a variety of source maps including survey plats, deed descriptions, subdivision plats, certified survey maps and right-of-way plats. All new parcels are entered into the database using coordinate geometry (COGO). Note that the End_Date column is used to identify retired parcels. Current parcels have no End_Date value and can be viewed by setting a definition query like this: SELECT * FROM Parcel WHERE End_Date IS NULL.

  2. a

    Parcel Linework

    • data-adcogov.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 25, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Adams County Colorado Government (2019). Parcel Linework [Dataset]. https://data-adcogov.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ADCOGOV::parcel-linework/explore
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 25, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Adams County Colorado Government
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Parcel lines in Adams County, Colorado. Updated weekly. These parcels are intended to depict approximate location of land ownership. NOT FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES. This data is not survey accuracy. The only people that can perform official surveys in the State of Colorado are Colorado Licensed Professional Land Surveyors. For a more detailed description of the parcel tables, refer to this document: Assessor Data Descriptions

  3. a

    Property Improvements

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • data-adcogov.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Feb 1, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Adams County Colorado Government (2019). Property Improvements [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/ADCOGOV::property-improvements
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 1, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Adams County Colorado Government
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Property improvements in Adams County, Colorado. Updated weekly. This table can be joined to the Parcels feature layer on the PARCELNB field. The standalone property tables are updated before the Parcels feature layer so there can be small discrepancies between them. For a more detailed description of this table, refer to this document: Assessor Data Descriptions.

  4. d

    Data from: USGS Interactive Map of the Colorado Front Range Infrastructure...

    • search.dataone.org
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    Updated Dec 1, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Biewick, L.R.H., Gunther, G.L., Roberts, S.B., Otton, J.K., Cook, T. and Fishman, N.S. (2016). USGS Interactive Map of the Colorado Front Range Infrastructure Resources [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/06a6bdd8-73d2-450d-bb9b-ab40d47c9d84
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Biewick, L.R.H., Gunther, G.L., Roberts, S.B., Otton, J.K., Cook, T. and Fishman, N.S.
    Area covered
    Description

    Infrastructure, such as roads, airports, water and energy transmission and distribution facilities, sewage treatment plants, and many other facilities, is vital to the sustainability and vitality of any populated area. Rehabilitation of existing and development of new infrastructure requires three natural resources: natural aggregate (stone, sand, and gravel), water, and energy http://rockyweb.cr.usgs.gov/frontrange/overview.htm.

    The principal goals of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Front Range Infrastructure Resources Project (FRIRP) were to develop information, define tools, and demonstrate ways to: (1) implement a multidisciplinary evaluation of the distribution and quality of a region's infrastructure resources, (2) identify issues that may affect availability of resources, and (3) work with cooperators to provide decision makers with tools to evaluate alternatives to enhance decision-making. Geographic integration of data (geospatial databases) can provide an interactive tool to facilitate decision-making by stakeholders http://rockyweb.cr.usgs.gov/frontrange/overview.htm.

  5. a

    Property Sales

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • data-adcogov.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 25, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Adams County Colorado Government (2019). Property Sales [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/maps/ADCOGOV::property-sales
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 25, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Adams County Colorado Government
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Property sales in Adams County, Colorado. Updated weekly. This table can be joined to the Parcels feature layer on the PARCELNB field. The standalone property tables are updated before the Parcels feature layer so there can be small discrepancies between them. For a more detailed description of this table, refer to this document: Assessor Data Descriptions

  6. d

    Legend Layer for Mapping Landcover of the Natchez Trace Parkway 2004-2005

    • dataone.org
    Updated Dec 1, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Amina Rangoonwala (Five Rivers Services, LLC at U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center); Terri Bannister (Five Rivers Services, LLC at U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center); Elijah W. Ramsey III, Ph.D (U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center) (2016). Legend Layer for Mapping Landcover of the Natchez Trace Parkway 2004-2005 [Dataset]. https://dataone.org/datasets/d39260a1-0449-46e3-b6d6-b8dc91c19248
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Amina Rangoonwala (Five Rivers Services, LLC at U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center); Terri Bannister (Five Rivers Services, LLC at U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center); Elijah W. Ramsey III, Ph.D (U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center)
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset defines the symbology for the landcover map of the Natchez Trace Parkway. The map shows the distribution of 18 landcover classes based on the National Vegetation Classification Standard. Ground-based vegetation classification was provided by National Park Service (NPS). The mapping output and layer delineate grasses, road-developed areas, scrub-shrub, shrubland, plantation, water bodies, areas of white oak, oak, pine-oak, pine-cedar, pine-sweetgum, sweetgum (including sweetgum-oak), scattered trees, swamp forest, irregular classes, aquatic vegetation, invasive species, canopy gaps, and clouds. Mapped classes that have been digitized are noted with an asterisk (*) in the legend.

  7. u

    Cadastral Information for Sam Adams 12

    • beta.data.urbandatacentre.ca
    • data.urbandatacentre.ca
    • +2more
    Updated Sep 13, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). Cadastral Information for Sam Adams 12 [Dataset]. https://beta.data.urbandatacentre.ca/dataset/gov-canada-4b4477df-87c3-43ac-9c6d-ab44ac0e6671
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 13, 2024
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This data provides the integrated cadastral framework for the specified Canada Land. The cadastral framework consists of active and superseded cadastral parcel, roads, easements, administrative areas, active lines, points and annotations. The cadastral lines form the boundaries of the parcels. COGO attributes are associated to the lines and depict the adjusted framework of the cadastral fabric. The cadastral annotations consist of lot numbers, block numbers, township numbers, etc. The cadastral framework is compiled from Canada Lands Survey Records (CLSR), Registration Plans (RS) and Location Sketches (LS) archived in the Canada Lands Survey Records.

  8. a

    Parcels

    • data-adcogov.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 25, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Adams County Colorado Government (2019). Parcels [Dataset]. https://data-adcogov.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/parcels
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 25, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Adams County Colorado Government
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Parcels in Adams County, Colorado containing ownership and site address information. Updated weekly. This layer can be related to the Property Sales, Property Values and Property Improvements tables on the PARCELNB field. The standalone property tables are updated before the Parcels feature layer so there can be small discrepancies between them. These parcels are intended to depict approximate location of land ownership. NOT FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES. This data is not survey accuracy. The only people that can perform official surveys in the State of Colorado are Colorado Licensed Professional Land Surveyors. For a more detailed description of the parcel tables, refer to this document: Assessor Data Descriptions

  9. a

    Parcels

    • data-auroraco.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 1, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Aurora, Colorado Maps (2016). Parcels [Dataset]. https://data-auroraco.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/AuroraCo::parcels-3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Aurora, Colorado Maps
    Description

    Platted parcels of the City of Aurora, Colorado. For ownership parcels, please see the county's GIS parcel data. The City of Aurora, Colorado sits in three different counties: Adams County, Arapahoe County, and Douglas County and lies just east of the City and County of Denver. The city's population was recently estimated over 400,000. Currently, the city is approximately 158 square miles and is annexing land in enclaves and to the east of the city.

  10. a

    Comprehensive Plan - PlaceTypes

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • data-auroraco.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 16, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Aurora, Colorado Maps (2019). Comprehensive Plan - PlaceTypes [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/AuroraCo::comprehensive-plan-placetypes/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 16, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Aurora, Colorado Maps
    Area covered
    Description

    City of Aurora, Colorado - Comprehensive Plan 2018: There are 10 place types throughout the city that address common land uses, including residential, commercial, open space, and community facilities. Place types are intended to depict general locations of each place type and not necessarily the land use designation of specific parcels. The City of Aurora, Colorado sits in three different counties: Adams County, Arapahoe County, and Douglas County and lies just east of the City and County of Denver.

  11. a

    Fayette County Ohio GIS Web Map

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 4, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Fayette County Ohio GIS (2018). Fayette County Ohio GIS Web Map [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/fayettegis::fayette-county-ohio-gis-web-map/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 4, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Fayette County Ohio GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    A web map used to access tax parcel, boundary, ownership, acreage, survey, zoning and tax information. Errors and Omissions Do Exist.The information provided is for reference only and subject to independent verification. User assumes all responsibility for its use.https://www.fayette-co-oh.com/Fayette County ProfileFayette County is a county located in the U.S. state of Ohio. Its county seat is Washington Court House. Fayette County was formed on March 1, 1810 from portions of Highland County and Ross County. It was named after Marie-Joseph Motier, Marquis de La Fayette, a French general and politician who took the side of the Colonials during the American Revolutionary War and who played an important role in the French Revolution.Fayette County is a part of the Virginia Military survey, which was reserved in 1783, to be allotted to Virginia soldiers. This district includes the entire counties of Adams, Brown, Clermont, Clinton, Highland, Fayette, Madison and Union; and a portion of the counties of Scioto, Pike, Ross, Pickaway, Franklin, Delaware, Marion, Hardin, Logan, Champaign, Clarke, Greene, Warren and Hamilton.Fayette County was formed January 19, 1810 (took effect March 1st) from Ross and Highland counties. Beginning at the southwest corner of Pickaway, running north “with the line of said county to the corner of Madison; thence west with the line of said Madison county to the line of Greene county; thence south with the line of Greene county to the southeast corner thereof; thence east five miles; thence south to the line of Highland county; thence east with said line to Paint Creek; thence in a straight line to the beginning.” All the lower portion was taken from Highland and the upper from Ross.The first portion of land entered within the territory of what is now Fayette county, was a part of original surveys Nos. 243 and 772, lying partly in Clinton county. The first survey lying wholly within Fayette county was No. 463, in what is now Madison township, surveyed for Thomas Overton by John O’Bannon June 30, 1776.The original townships were Jefferson, Greene, Wayne, Madison, Paint and Union. Concord township was formed in April 1818, from Greene. Marion township was formed in June, 1840 from Madison. Perry township was formed June 4, 1845, from Wayne and Greene. Jasper township was formed from Jefferson and Concord December 2, 1845.Washington C.H. was laid out originally on a part of entry 757, which contained 1200 acres and belonged to Benjamin Temple, of Logan county, Kentucky, who donated 150 acres to Fayette county, on condition that it be used as the site of the county seat. The deed of conveyance was made December 1, 1810, by Thomas S. Hind, attorney for Temple, to Robert Stewart, who was appointed by the legislature as director for the town of Washington. The town was laid off some time between December 1, 1810, and February 26, 1811, the latter being the date of the record of the town plat.Bloomingburg (originally called New Lexington) was laid out in 1815, by Solomon Bowers, and originally contained 34 and ¾ acres. On March 4, 1816, Bowers laid out and added twenty more lots. The name of the town was later changed to Bloomingburg by act of the legislature. The town was incorporated by act of the legislature, February 5, 1847.Jeffersonville was laid out March 1, 1831, by Walter B. Write and Chipman Robinson, on 100 acres of land belonging to them, they started selling the lots at $5 each. The town incorporated March 17, 1838. The first house was erected by Robert Wyley.The first railroad, now the C. & M. V., was completed in 1852; the second, now the Detroit Southern, in 1875; the third, now the C.H. & D. in 1879; and the fourth, now the B. & O. S. W., in 1884.The first permanent settler (probably) was a Mr. Wolf who settled in what is now Wayne township, in about the year 1796. - Circa 1886 - Map of Fayette County, Ohio. Issued by the Fayette County Record.

  12. a

    Parcels

    • gis-arvada.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 2, 2006
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    arvada (2006). Parcels [Dataset]. https://gis-arvada.opendata.arcgis.com/items/602790b439154d8bac95ae7f3562911f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 2, 2006
    Dataset authored and provided by
    arvada
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    City of Arvada Parcels which fall in Jefferson County and Adams County. A parcel is any division of land held under one ownership, regardless of size. County Assessor's offices maintain these land records according to the legally-defined ownership boundaries and assigns each parcel a unique parcel identification number, or PIN, for recording purposes. The PIN becomes the universal method of referencing that particular property for the purposes of taxation, zoning, mortgages, liens, etc.

  13. a

    Easements

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • data-auroraco.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 2, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Aurora, Colorado Maps (2015). Easements [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/AuroraCo::easements
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 2, 2015
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Aurora, Colorado Maps
    Area covered
    Description

    City of Aurora, Colorado easements. Please keep in mind that this easement GIS layer must be paired with City of Aurora parcel GIS layer to show some line work. Also note that the easement layer isn't complete and continues to be worked on. The city's focus is on collecting city owned easements and not on privately owned easements. See disclaimer and terms of use. The City of Aurora, Colorado sits in three different counties: Adams County, Arapahoe County, and Douglas County and lies just east of the City and County of Denver.

  14. a

    NDGISHUB County Roads

    • gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 9, 2011
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of North Dakota (2011). NDGISHUB County Roads [Dataset]. https://gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/NDGOV::ndgishub-county-roads/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 9, 2011
    Dataset authored and provided by
    State of North Dakota
    Area covered
    Description

    11/22/2024- County-wide road updates were completed in Golden Valley and Billings Counties. Intersecting routes throughout the state were cartographically realigned in preparation of MIRE intersections 6/27/2024 - The data was prepared for HPMS submittal which included updated 2023 AADT values and to keep certain segments consistent with HPMS segments, mainly sample sections and the NHS, values of "BOTH", "NHS" and "SAMPLE" were added to the field HPMS_ROUTE_ID to distinguish these segments from other segments. 3/19/2024 - Miscellaneous updates were done in Dunn County. County wide updates to Grand Forks and Golden Valley counties along with route realignments at intersections throughout the state.12/04/2023 - County wide updates to Walsh, Dunn and Grand Forks Counties and various updates to county/local roads throughout the state including street names in Westhope8/23/2023 - Function Class changes were updated in McLean and Mountrail Counties. Function Class updates also occurred in the cities of Fargo, Valley City, West Fargo and Williston. County-wide updates completed for: Towner, Cavalier, Pembina, Pierce, Benson, Ramsey. 2022 AADTs updated. A road was also removed in Bottineau County at the request off a landowner.5/19/22 - Dunn County contacted the NDDOT with data updates ,Rolette County was updated, and the 2021 AADT's were updated. 2/14/22 - Contacted by the Dunn County Road Dept., updates were made on newly paved road segments. 1/20/2022 - Since the August 2021 update, Morton, Stark, Hettinger, Bowman, Adams, Slope, Grant and Sioux Counties have been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide. Function Class changes have been made in the Bismarck/Mandan Metro, Grand Forks County and Burleigh County.6/15/21 - Since the 2019 update, trails and seldom used trails were updated statewide using 2018,and 2019 imagery. Steele, Traill and Griggs Counties have also been updated using 2020 imagery. Surface type has been checked and updated on all functionally classified roads statewide New roads added includes roads in the Fargo, West Fargo, Grand Forks, Jamestown, Bismarck, Mandan, Minot, Dickinson, Watford City and Williston. Ownership on Federal jurisdiction roads were also updated based on an dataset received for FHWA in conjunction with the HPMS submittal. HPMS (Highway Performance Monitoring System) fields were also added in an effort to integrate the roads county data into HPMS and MIRE (Model Inventory Roadway Elements). 9/14/20 - Added the following fields - AADT, AADT_YR, HPMS_MAINTENANCE_OPERATIONS, HPMS_THROUGH_LANES, FUNCTIONAL_CLASS (replaces FUNCTION_CLASS)8/13/19 - The following counties were updated by using a variety of aerial photography: Eddy, Foster and Barnes. Seldom used trails have been added to Barnes, Benson, Billings, Bottineau, and Bowman Counties. Mercer County had (2) 61STAvenues, this has been corrected.12/26/18 - The following counties have had their roads updated by a variety of aerial photography, McHenry, Wells, Kidder, Cass (with aid of Cass county website) and McKenzie (with aid of McKenzie County GIS Coordinator)8/14/18 - Counties updated using 2017 NAIP Imagery are Ward, Mountrail, Burke and Renville counties. Seldom used trails are also being digitized into the dataset. They are being added as counties are being checked, so it will take some time for all seldom used trails to be added statewide. Also since the last update, all local roads that are in the corporate boundaries have been broken at the boundaries so it is easier to query to determine which roads go with each community.5/21/18 - removed CITY_INT_ID column - no longer used because of CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes. Removed SERVICE_LEVEL field, never used/maintained.4/19/18 - added HPMS_OWNERSHIP and HPMS_FACILITY fields for HPMS submittal1/24/18 - added CITY_FIPS and HPMS_URBAN_CODE attributes/domains. These columns will replace CITY_INT_ID and SOURCE_ID columns (eventually).11/15/17 - Williams, Divide and Bottineau counties have been updated. Great effort has been taken to update attributes and QC null fields. Functional Classified roads in Bismarck and Mandan have been updated as have local roads in Bismarck, Mandan, Williston, Fargo – West Fargo and Minot. 1/25/17 - started to maintain roads in Esri's Road and Highways. The shapes now contain measures in miles along with the associated linear referencing/roads and highways fields. Removed INSET_ASSOC field and added COUNTY_FIPS field.Updates include the counties of Emmons, Logan, McIntosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent and Richland. These counties were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets. In addition to these updates, the whole county dataset was edited using Data Reviewer checks. The checks ran included unnecessary nodes, non-linear segments, invalid geometry, Duplicate vertices with a tolerance of .5 meters, polyline closes of self, checked for cutbacks using a 15 degree minimum angle, checked for polyline length check using a distance less than 10 meters, checked for multipart lines, inspected dangles with a tolerance of 10 meters, and checked for orphans. All checks were inspected and fixed where appropriate.7/16/14 - updates include: Traill, Barnes, Stutsman, Kidder, Bowman, Slope, Stark, Hettinger, Adams, Grant, Sioux and Morton. These datasets were updated using a combination of the available NAIP aerials, the DES aerials, and by car within the insets.10/22/12 - city streets were updated in Bismarck, Dickinson, Minot and Williston. GIS data from the city of Bismarck was used to update Bismarck, GIS data and 2012 aerial photography was used to update the city of Williston, Minot’s city map and the 2010 aerial photography from Ward County was used to update Minot, and 2011 aerial photography and Dickinson’s "working" city map was used to update Dickinson. The counties updated were Williams, Burke, Bottineau, Mountrail, Ward, Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Steele, and Cass. At the time of this updated, approximately 50% of Stutsman and 50% of Traill Counties are updated. Williams, Bottineau, Ward, and Mountrail roads were inspected from the air and the 2009 NAIP photos were also used to assist the updates. The roads in Williams County were also recoded to match Williams County naming conventions. Williams County CADD map which is on the Williams county web site was used in updating the road names. In Ward County, the 2010 image from Ward County was used to assist in updating Ward County. The 2010 NAIP photos were used to update Wells, Eddy, Foster, Griggs and Steele Counties. Cass was updated with the assistance of the Cass County GIS layer and the 2011 Cass county imagery. 10/3/2011 - County roads were edited in the cities of Fargo, West Fargo, Horace, Minot, Bismarck, Devils Lake, Grafton, Williston, Valley City, and Dickinson. Also, a part of Ward and Mchenry Counties was edited and the county of Renville has been updated. The business routes through Bismarck and Jamestown were also edited. 5/9/2011 - Updated streets in Bismarck, Mandan, Jamestown, Dickinson, West Fargo ( not quite finished yet), and Valley City. Also, corrected the north - south roads in Township 144N Ranges 49 - 53 E, (in Traill County) 10/5/10 - The original Roads_County data was maintained in two separate ArcInfo coverages and then combined each year and exported to the NDHUB infrastructure. These two coverages have now been combined into one SDE feature class and is being edited within the SDE environment. The following changes have been made to feature class. Deleted all the A1 and A2 Fields so a person would have to hunt back and forth to find a road name. Road names consist of the following fields: RTE_ID, STR_TYP, SUF_DIR, & LAN_DIR. The CMC route numbers were moved from the A1_ prefixed fields to the CMC field to better track the CMC route. Created a County Highway field so we can enter the county road number. It consists of the counties name and number. This is still a work in progress. Created FS_RD_Number and FS_RD_Name fields to better track Forest Service roads. Created Bia-RD_Number and BIA_RD_Name fields to better track Bureau of Indian Affairs roads. The following field changes are used for NDDOT specific processes: Created a service level field which is something that may be used in the future. Currently it contains how Walsh County prioritizes their roads. Created a Through and Connecting Route field so we can so select routes through the towns and cities. This was created exclusively for the county base maps. Created an Inset Associated field. This was created so the information in the rd_misc would come into the county routes. In the future, it is planned to be deleted. 6/18/09 - Updated county routes from aerial observation and photo interpretation using 2003, 2005, 2006 NAIP photos and 2008 photography from Designs camera. Counties updated were Golden Valley, Billings, McKenzie, Dunn, Mercer, Oliver, McLean, Sheridan and Burleigh. City streets were rectified in these counties using the 2003 NAIP photos. Observations were performed by Steven Nelson. 4/17/08 - Updated road surface types in NE. Rolette, Pierce, Benson, Towner, Ramsey, Cavalier, Pembina, Walsh, Grand Forks and Nelson from the 2006 aerial observations by Dewaine Olson 2/13/07 - Updated via 2004 NAIP photos: Barnes, Cass, Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Kidder, Steele, Stutsman, Traill, Wells. Combined Misc Roads and County Roads. Blank fields mean unknown attribute. Use P_STREET_NAME for dynamic labeling. We are also in the process of removing all proposed roads. 12/28/05 - Counties updated: Emmons, Logan, Mcintosh, Lamoure, Dickey, Ransom, Sargent, Richland, Divide, Williams, Burke, Mountrail, Ward, Renville, Bottineau, and Mchenry This data came from the NDDOT's Mapping Section. The original data was digitized from hand scribed maps and registered

  15. a

    City Limits

    • data-auroraco.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 29, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Aurora, Colorado Maps (2015). City Limits [Dataset]. https://data-auroraco.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/AuroraCo::city-limits/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2015
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Aurora, Colorado Maps
    Area covered
    Description

    City limits of the City of Aurora, Colorado. The City of Aurora, Colorado (at 164.8 square miles) sits in three different counties: Adams County, Arapahoe County, and Douglas County and lies just east of the City and County of Denver. The city's population is estimated at over 400,000 and is currently the 50th largest city in the U.S.A. The city is annexing land in enclaves and to the east of the city, please check back frequently for the latest data.

  16. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Adams County Land Information (2022). Parcels [Dataset]. https://adams-county-open-data-portal-adams-county-wi.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/parcels-1

Parcels

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Feb 18, 2022
Dataset authored and provided by
Adams County Land Information
Area covered
Description

The Adams County Parcel Database was derived from a variety of source maps including survey plats, deed descriptions, subdivision plats, certified survey maps and right-of-way plats. All new parcels are entered into the database using coordinate geometry (COGO). Note that the End_Date column is used to identify retired parcels. Current parcels have no End_Date value and can be viewed by setting a definition query like this: SELECT * FROM Parcel WHERE End_Date IS NULL.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu