Affordable housing production and preservation projects are managed by the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (DMPED), the DC Housing Authority, the DC Housing Finance Agency and DC's Inclusionary Zoning program. This dataset comprehensively covers affordable housing projects which started (i.e. reached financial closing and/or started construction) or completed since January of 2015. The data includes affordable housing projects (production and preservation, rental and for-sale) which were subsidized by DMPED, DHCD, DCHFA, or DCHA, and those which were produced as a result of Planned Unit Development (PUD) proffers or Inclusionary Zoning (IZ) requirements.

The rental housing developments listed below are among the thousands of affordable units that are supported by City of Chicago programs to maintain affordability in local neighborhoods. The list is updated periodically when construction is completed for new projects or when the compliance period for older projects expire, typically after 30 years. The list is provided as a courtesy to the public. It does not include every City-assisted affordable housing unit that may be available for rent, nor does it include the hundreds of thousands of naturally occurring affordable housing units located throughout Chicago without City subsidies. For information on rents, income requirements and availability for the projects listed, contact each property directly. For information on other affordable rental properties in Chicago and Illinois, call (877) 428-8844, or visit www.ILHousingSearch.org.

This dataset contains information for all the affordable housings in the Champaign County, including name, location, and number of units, and affordable housing program. The data is retrieved from Housing Authority of Champaign County Annual Report, HUD LIHTC Database, and Section 8 and Section 202 housing listing.

Comprehensive database of Low Income Housing Tax Credit properties across the United States

This data, maintained by the Mayor’s Office of Housing (MOH), is an inventory of all income-restricted units in the city. This data includes public housing owned by the Boston Housing Authority (BHA), privately- owned housing built with funding from DND and/or on land that was formerly City-owned, and privately-owned housing built without any City subsidy, e.g., created using Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) or as part of the Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP). Information is gathered from a variety of sources, including the City's IDP list, permitting and completion data from the Inspectional Services Department (ISD), newspaper advertisements for affordable units, Community Economic Development Assistance Corporation’s (CEDAC) Expiring Use list, and project lists from the BHA, the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), MassHousing, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), among others. The data is meant to be as exhaustive and up-to-date as possible, but since many units are not required to report data to the City of Boston, MOH is constantly working to verify and update it. See the data dictionary for more information on the structure of the data and important notes. The database only includes units that have a deed-restriction. It does not include tenant-based (also known as mobile) vouchers, which subsidize rent, but move with the tenant and are not attached to a particular unit. There are over 22,000 tenant-based vouchers in the city of Boston which provide additional affordability to low- and moderate-income households not accounted for here. The Income-Restricted Housing report can be directly accessed here:
https://www.boston.gov/sites/default/files/file/2023/04/Income%20Restricted%20Housing%202022_0.pdf

Learn more about income-restricted housing (as well as other types of affordable housing) here: https://www.boston.gov/affordable-housing-boston#income-restricted

Comprehensive dataset of 98 Low income housing programs in Ohio, United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

Disclaimer: PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS DATA SET. BY USING THIS DATA SET, YOU ARE CONSENTING TO BE OBLIGATED AND BECOME A PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS BELOW YOU SHOULD NOT ACCESS OR USE THIS DATA SET. This data set is presented as a public service that provides Internet accessibility to information provided by the City of Los Angeles and to other City, State, and Federal information. Due to the dynamic nature of the information contained within this data set and the data set’s reliance on information from outside sources, the City of Los Angeles does not guarantee the accuracy or reliability of the information transmitted from this data set. This data set and all materials contained on it are distributed and transmitted on an “as is” and “as available” basis without any warranties of any kind, whether expressed or implied, including without limitation, warranties of title or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The City of Los Angeles is not responsible for any special, indirect, incidental, punitive, or consequential damages that may arise from the use of, or the inability to use the data set and/or materials contained on the data set, or that result from mistakes, omissions, interruptions, deletion of files, errors, defects, delays in operation, or transmission, or any failure of performance, whether the material is provided by the City of Los Angeles or a third-party. The City of Los Angeles reserves the right to modify, update, or alter these Terms and Conditions of use at any time. Your continued use of this Site constitutes your agreement to comply with such modifications. The information provided on this data set, and its links to other related web sites, are provided as a courtesy to our web site visitors only, and are in no manner an endorsement, recommendation, or approval of any person, any product, or any service contained on any other web site. Description: LAHD financed projects since 2003 to present. These projects are financed with programs including Affordable Housing Managed Pipeline, Supportive Housing Program, Affordable Housing Bond Program, and the Proposition HHH Supportive Housing Loan Program. This project list contains participants, property, units, construction and milestone information. Each line contains both site and project level information. Site level information are presented with "SITE_" in the column headers. Column headers without "SITE_" are project level information.

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is the primary Federal program for creating affordable housing in the United States. The LIHTC database, created by HUD and available to the public since 1997, contains information on 33,777 projects and almost 2,203,000 housing units placed in service between 1987 and 2010. Created by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the LIHTC program gives State and local LIHTC-allocating agencies the equivalent of nearly $8 billion in annual budget authority to issue tax credits for the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of rental housing targeted to lower-income households. Although some data about the program have been made available by various sources, HUD's database is the only complete national source of information on the size, unit mix, and location of individual projects. With the continued support of the national LIHTC database, HUD hopes to enable researchers to learn more about the effects of the tax credit program. The LIHTC property locations depicted in this map service represent the general location of the property. The locations of individual buildings associated with each property are not depicted here. The location of the property is derived from the address of the building with the most units.

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) property locations depicted in this map service represent the general _location of the property. The locations of individual buildings associated with each property are not depicted here. The _location of the property is derived from the address of the building with the most units. Location data for HUD-related properties and facilities are derived from HUD's enterprise geocoding service. The LIHTC database contains information on 40,502 projects and almost 2.6 million housing units placed in service since 1987.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) periodically receives "custom tabulations" of Census data from the U.S. Census Bureau that are largely not available through standard Census products. These datasets, known as "CHAS" (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) data, demonstrate the extent of housing problems and housing needs, particularly for low income households. The primary purpose of CHAS data is to demonstrate the number of households in need of housing assistance. This is estimated by the number of households that have certain housing problems and have income low enough to qualify for HUD’s programs (primarily 30, 50, and 80 percent of median income). CHAS data provides counts of the numbers of households that fit these HUD-specified characteristics in a variety of geographic areas. In addition to estimating low-income housing needs, CHAS data contributes to a more comprehensive market analysis by documenting issues like lead paint risks, "affordability mismatch," and the interaction of affordability with variables like age of homes, number of bedrooms, and type of building.This dataset is a special tabulation of the 2016-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) and reflects conditions over that time period. The dataset uses custom HUD Area Median Family Income (HAMFI) figures calculated by HUD PDR staff based on 2016-2020 ACS income data. CHAS datasets are used by Federal, State, and Local governments to plan how to spend, and distribute HUD program funds. To learn more about the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), visit: https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cp.html, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. To learn more about the American Community Survey (ACS), and associated datasets visit: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs Data Dictionary: DD_ACS 5-Year CHAS Estimate Data by County Date of Coverage: 2016-2020

Comprehensive dataset of 253 Low income housing programs in Washington, United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

HUD's LIHTC database contains information on 53,032 projects and 3.65 million housing units placed in service between 1987 and 2022. Data for properties placed in service in 2023 will be collected in the fall of 2024 and added to this database in the spring of 2025. The database includes project address, number of units and low-income units, number of bedrooms, year the credit was allocated, year the project was placed in service, whether the project was new construction or rehab, type of credit provided, and other sources of project financing. The database has been geocoded, enabling researchers to look at the geographical distribution and neighborhood characteristics of tax credit projects. It may also help show how incentives to locate projects in low-income areas and other underserved markets are working. With the continued support of the national LIHTC database, HUD hopes to enable researchers to learn more about the effects of the tax credit program.Summary of filesIn the zip file:LIHTC Data Dictionary 2022.PDF - The data dictionary for the LIHTC database (multiple address data use same formats) in Adobe Acrobat.LIHTCPUB.ACCDB - The LIHTC Database in MS Access format. This file also includes building addresses from HUD’s LIHTC tenant data collection.LIHTCPUB.CSV - The LIHTC Database in CSV format.missing data.PDF - Percent of Projects with Missing Data by Variable and Year Placed in Service

Subsidized Housing Unit data was downloaded from the National Housing Preservation Database for Atlanta, Baltimore, Detroit, New Orleans, Pittsburgh, and Oakland, CA in June 2017. The data was spatialized by Data Driven Detroit. More information concerning the subsidized housing programs can be found here. The dataset includes active and inactive subsidized housing units.

The dataset contains current data on low rent and Section 8 units in PHA's administered by HUD. The Section 8 Rental Voucher Program increases affordable housing choices for very low-income households by allowing families to choose privately owned rental housing. Through the Section 8 Rental Voucher Program, the administering housing authority issues a voucher to an income-qualified household, which then finds a unit to rent. If the unit meets the Section 8 quality standards, the PHA then pays the landlord the amount equal to the difference between 30 percent of the tenant's adjusted income (or 10 percent of the gross income or the portion of welfare assistance designated for housing) and the PHA-determined payment standard for the area. The rent must be reasonable compared with similar unassisted units.

For more information, please visit HART.ubc.ca. Housing Assessment Resource Tools (HART) This database was created to accompany a report prepared by Joe Daniels, PhD, and Martine August, PhD, entitled “Acquisitions Programs for Affordable Housing: Creating non-market supply and preserving affordability with existing multi-family housing.” The database and report form part of the work performed under the HART project, and the report can be found at HART’s website: HART.ubc.ca. The database is a single table that summarizes 11 key elements, plus notes and references, of a growing list of policies from governments across the world. There are currently 108 policies included in the database. The authors expect to update this database with additional policies from time to time. The authors hope this database will serve as a resource for governments looking to become familiar with a variety of policies in order to help them evaluate what policies might be most applicable in their communities. Data Fields: List of data fields (15 total): 1. Government Order 2. Government Jurisdiction 3. Policy Name/Action 4. Acquisition Target 5. Years Active 6. Funder/Funding 7. Funding Amount (Program) 8. Funding Form 9. Affordability Standard 10. Affordability Term 11. Features/Requirements 12. Comments 13. Reference link 1 14. Reference link 2 15. Reference link 3 Description of data fields (15) 1. Government Order: - Categorizes the relative political authority in terms of one of three categories: Municipal (responsible for a city or small region), Provincial (responsible for multiple municipalities), or Country (responsible for multiple provinces; highest political authority). - This field may be used to help identify those policies most relevant to the reader. 2. Government Jurisdiction: - Indicates the name of the government. - For example, a country might be named “Canada,” a province might be named “Quebec,” and a municipality might be named “Calgary.” 3. Policy Name/Action: - Indicates the name of the policy. - This generally serves as the unique identifier for the record. However, there may be some programs that are only known by a common term; for example, “Right of First Refusal.” 4. Acquisition Target: - Describes the type of housing asset that the policy is concerned with. For example, acquiring land, acquiring existing rental buildings, renovating existing supportive housing. 5. Years Active: - The time period that the policy has been active. - Typically formatted as “[Year started] - [Year ended]”. If just a single year is listed (e.g. “2009”) that means the policy was only active that one year. - If the policy is active with no end date, then the format will be “[Year started] - ongoing.” If the policy has a specified end date in the future, that year will be listed instead: “[Year started] – [Expected final year].” 6. Funder/Funding: - The government, government agency, or organization responsible for the use of those funds made available through the policy. 7. Funding Amount (Program): - The dollar value of funds connected to the policy. - Sometimes this is the total value of funds available to the policy, and sometimes it is the actual value of funds that were used. - The funds indicated here do not necessarily correspond to the time period indicated in the ‘Years Active’ field. Additional detail will be added to clarify whenever possible. - If policy has “N/A” listed here, see ‘Features/Requirements’ for more information. 8. Funding Form: - Indicates the type of financial tools available to the policy. For example, “capital funding,” “forgivable loans,” or “rent supplements.” - If policy has “N/A” listed here, see ‘Features/Requirements’ for more information. 9. Affordability Standard: - Indicates whether the policy includes an explicit standard or benchmark of affordability that is used to guide or otherwise inform the policy’s goals. 10. Affordability Term: - Indicates whether the affordability standard applies to a specific time period. - This field may also contain other information on time periods that are relevant to the policy; for example, an operating loan guaranteed to be active for a specific number of years. 11. Features/Requirements: - Describes the broad objectives of the policy as well as any specific guidelines that the policy must follow. 12. Comments: - Author’s commentary on the policy. 13. Reference link 1: - A web address (URL) or citation indicating the source of the details on the policy. 14. Reference link 2: - A second web address (URL) or citation indicating the source of the details on the policy. 15. Reference link 3: - A third web address (URL) or citation indicating the source of the details on the policy. File list (1): 1. Property Acquisition Policy Database.xlsx

Housing costs can represent a substantial financial burden to households, especially low-income households. The median of the ratio of housing costs over income gives an indication of the financial pressure that households face from housing costs. Another common measure of housing affordability presented in this indicator is the housing cost overburden rate, which measures the proportion of households or population that spend more than 40% of their disposable income on housing costs (in line with Eurostat methodology). For a discussion of different measures of housing affordability and their advantages and limits, please see indicator HC1.5 Overview of affordable housing indicators in the OECD Affordable Housing Database. For policy measures aiming to support households with housing costs, please see indicators in the PH2, PH3 and PH4 series. Housing costs can refer to: (1) a narrow definition based on rent and mortgage costs (principal repayment and mortgage interest); or (2) a wider definition that also includes the costs of mandatory services and charges, regular maintenance and repairs, taxes and utilities, which are referred to as “total housing costs” below. Housing costs are considered as a share of household disposable income, which includes social transfers (such as housing allowances) and excludes taxes. Income is equivalised for household size based on a common equivalence elasticity (the square root of household size) which implies that a household’s economic needs increase less than proportionally with its size. Housing costs refer to the primary residence. The data presented here are based on household survey microdata and concern national household or population level data.

Number of provincially, territorially, regionally and municipally owned social and affordable housing assets for all provinces and territories.

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program gives State and local agencies the equivalent of nearly $8 billion in annual budget authority to issue tax credits for the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of rental housing targeted to lower-income households. The LIHTC database, created by HUD and available to the public since 1997, contains information on over 47,000 projects and 3 million housing units placed in service between 1987 and 2017. It is the only complete national source of information on the size, unit mix, and location of individual projects. These data have also been geocoded, enabling researchers to look at the geographical distribution and neighborhood characteristics of tax credit projects. It may also help show how incentives to locate projects in low-income areas and other underserved markets are working. The database includes project address, number of units and low-income units, number of bedrooms, year the credit was allocated, year the project was placed in service, whether the project was new construction or rehab, type of credit provided, and other sources of project financing. For more information, see HUD.gov

The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is the most important resource for creating affordable housing in the United States today. The LIHTC database, created by HUD and available to the public since 1997, contains information on 37,506 projects and almost 2,318,000 housing units placed in service between 1987 and 2011. Data is a PDF file.

Created by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program (LIHTC) gives State and local LIHTC-allocating agencies the equivalent of nearly $8 billion in annual budget authority to issue tax credits for the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of rental housing targeted to lower-income households. Although some data about the program have been made available by various sources, HUD's database is the only complete national source of information on the size, unit mix, and location of individual projects. With the continued support of the national LIHTC database, HUD hopes to enable researchers to learn more about the effects of the tax credit program.HUD has no administrative authority over the LIHTC program. IRS has authority at the federal level and it is structured so that the states truly administer the program. The LIHTC property locations depicted in this map service represent the general location of the property. The locations of individual buildings associated with each property are not depicted here. The location of the property is derived from the address of the building with the most units. Location data for HUD-related properties and facilities are derived from HUD's enterprise geocoding service. While not all addresses are able to be geocoded and mapped to 100% accuracy, we are continuously working to improve address data quality and enhance coverage. Please consider this issue when using any datasets provided by HUD. When using this data, take note of the field titled “LVL2KX” which indicates the overall accuracy of the geocoded address using the following return codes:‘R’ - Interpolated rooftop (high degree of accuracy, symbolized as green)‘4’ - ZIP+4 centroid (high degree of accuracy, symbolized as green)‘B’ - Block group centroid (medium degree of accuracy, symbolized as yellow)‘T’ - Census tract centroid (low degree of accuracy, symbolized as red)‘2’ - ZIP+2 centroid (low degree of accuracy, symbolized as red)‘Z’ - ZIP5 centroid (low degree of accuracy, symbolized as red)‘5’ - ZIP5 centroid (same as above, low degree of accuracy, symbolized as red)Null - Could not be geocoded (does not appear on the map)For the purposes of displaying the location of an address on a map only use addresses and their associated lat/long coordinates where the LVL2KX field is coded ‘R’ or ‘4’. These codes ensure that the address is displayed on the correct street segment and in the correct census block.The remaining LVL2KX codes provide a cascading indication of the most granular level geography for which an address can be confirmed. For example, if an address cannot be accurately interpolated to a rooftop (‘R’), or ZIP+4 centroid (‘4’), then the address will be mapped to the centroid of the next nearest confirmed geography: block group, tract, and so on. When performing any point-in polygon analysis it is important to note that points mapped to the centroids of larger geographies will be less likely to map accurately to the smaller geographies of the same area. For instance, a point coded as ‘5’ in the correct ZIP Code will be less likely to map to the correct block group or census tract for that address.