[Metadata] Description: Agricultural Land Use Maps (ALUM) for islands of Kauai, Oahu, Maui, Molokai, Lanai and Hawaii as of 1978-1980. Sources: State Department of Agriculture; Hawaii Statewide GIS Program, Office of Planning. Note: August, 2018 - Corrected one incorrect record, removed coded value attribute domain.For more information on data sources and methodologies used, please refer to complete metadata at https://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/gis/data/alum.pdf or contact Hawaii Statewide GIS Program, Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, State of Hawaii; PO Box 2359, Honolulu, HI 96804; (808) 587-2846; email: gis@hawaii.gov; Website: https://planning.hawaii.gov/gis.

Introduction and Rationale: Due to our increasing understanding of the role the surrounding landscape plays in ecological processes, a detailed characterization of land cover, including both agricultural and natural habitats, is ever more important for both researchers and conservation practitioners. Unfortunately, in the United States, different types of land cover data are split across thematic datasets that emphasize agricultural or natural vegetation, but not both. To address this data gap and reduce duplicative efforts in geospatial processing, we merged two major datasets, the LANDFIRE National Vegetation Classification (NVC) and USDA-NASS Cropland Data Layer (CDL), to produce an integrated land cover map. Our workflow leveraged strengths of the NVC and the CDL to produce detailed rasters comprising both agricultural and natural land-cover classes. We generated these maps for each year from 2012-2021 for the conterminous United States, quantified agreement between input layers and accuracy of our merged product, and published the complete workflow necessary to update these data. In our validation analyses, we found that approximately 5.5% of NVC agricultural pixels conflicted with the CDL, but we resolved a majority of these conflicts based on surrounding agricultural land, leaving only 0.6% of agricultural pixels unresolved in our merged product. Contents: Spatial data Attribute table for merged rasters Technical validation data Number and proportion of mismatched pixels Number and proportion of unresolved pixels Producer's and User's accuracy values and coverage of reference data Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Attribute table for merged rasters. File Name: CombinedRasterAttributeTable_CDLNVC.csvResource Description: Raster attribute table for merged raster product. Class names and recommended color map were taken from USDA-NASS Cropland Data Layer and LANDFIRE National Vegetation Classification. Class values are also identical to source data, except classes from the CDL are now negative values to avoid overlapping NVC values. Resource Title: Number and proportion of mismatched pixels. File Name: pixel_mismatch_byyear_bycounty.csvResource Description: Number and proportion of pixels that were mismatched between the Cropland Data Layer and National Vegetation Classification, per year from 2012-2021, per county in the conterminous United States.Resource Title: Number and proportion of unresolved pixels. File Name: unresolved_conflict_byyear_bycounty.csvResource Description: Number and proportion of unresolved pixels in the final merged rasters, per year from 2012-2021, per county in the conterminous United States. Unresolved pixels are a result of mismatched pixels that we could not resolve based on surrounding agricultural land (no agriculture with 90m radius).Resource Title: Producer's and User's accuracy values and coverage of reference data. File Name: accuracy_datacoverage_byyear_bycounty.csvResource Description: Producer's and User's accuracy values and coverage of reference data, per year from 2012-2021, per county in the conterminous United States. We defined coverage of reference data as the proportional area of land cover classes that were included in the reference data published by USDA-NASS and LANDFIRE for the Cropland Data Layer and National Vegetation Classification, respectively. CDL and NVC classes with reference data also had published accuracy statistics. Resource Title: Data Dictionary. File Name: Data_Dictionary_RasterMerge.csv

This map displays drought, climate and agriculture data for the United States. The map was created by the National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS) and is a component of the Agriculture Sector web mapping application, a tool for exploring the relationship between drought, climate and the agricultural sector in the United States.Data Sources for each layer are identified in the Layer section below as well as in the Layer and Legend sections of the web map. Additional information about the impact of drought on agriculture can be found on the NIDIS Agriculture Sector page.

NOTICE TO PROVISIONAL 2023 LAND USE DATA USERS: Please note that on December 6, 2024 the Department of Water Resources (DWR) published the Provisional 2023 Statewide Crop Mapping dataset. The link for the shapefile format of the data mistakenly linked to the wrong dataset. The link was updated with the appropriate data on January 27, 2025. If you downloaded the Provisional 2023 Statewide Crop Mapping dataset in shapefile format between December 6, 2024 and January 27, we encourage you to redownload the data. The Map Service and Geodatabase formats were correct as posted on December 06, 2024.

Thank you for your interest in DWR land use datasets.

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has been collecting land use data throughout the state and using it to develop agricultural water use estimates for statewide and regional planning purposes, including water use projections, water use efficiency evaluations, groundwater model developments, climate change mitigation and adaptations, and water transfers. These data are essential for regional analysis and decision making, which has become increasingly important as DWR and other state agencies seek to address resource management issues, regulatory compliances, environmental impacts, ecosystem services, urban and economic development, and other issues. Increased availability of digital satellite imagery, aerial photography, and new analytical tools make remote sensing-based land use surveys possible at a field scale that is comparable to that of DWR’s historical on the ground field surveys. Current technologies allow accurate large-scale crop and land use identifications to be performed at desired time increments and make possible more frequent and comprehensive statewide land use information. Responding to this need, DWR sought expertise and support for identifying crop types and other land uses and quantifying crop acreages statewide using remotely sensed imagery and associated analytical techniques. Currently, Statewide Crop Maps are available for the Water Years 2014, 2016, 2018- 2022 and PROVISIONALLY for 2023.

Historic County Land Use Surveys spanning 1986 - 2015 may also be accessed using the CADWR Land Use Data Viewer: https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/CADWRLandUseViewer.

For Regional Land Use Surveys follow: https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/region-land-use-surveys.

For County Land Use Surveys follow: https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/county-land-use-surveys.

For a collection of ArcGIS Web Applications that provide information on the DWR Land Use Program and our data products in various formats, visit the DWR Land Use Gallery: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/collections/dd14ceff7d754e85ab9c7ec84fb8790a.

Recommended citation for DWR land use data: California Department of Water Resources. (Water Year for the data). Statewide Crop Mapping—California Natural Resources Agency Open Data. Retrieved “Month Day, YEAR,” from https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/statewide-crop-mapping.

The dataset contains a map of the main classes of agricultural land use (dominant crop types and other land use types) in Germany for the year 2023. It complements a series of maps that are produced annually at the Thünen Institute beginning with the year 2017 on the basis of satellite data. The maps cover the entire open landscape, i.e., the agriculturally used area (UAA) and e.g., uncultivated areas. The map was derived from time series of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, Landsat 8 and additional environmental data. Map production is based on the methods described in Blickensdörfer et al. (2022).

All optical satellite data were managed, pre-processed and structured in an analysis-ready data (ARD) cube using the open-source software FORCE - Framework for Operational Radiometric Correction for Environmental monitoring (Frantz, D., 2019), in which SAR and environmental data were integrated.

The map extent covers all areas in Germany that are defined as agricultural land, grassland, small woody features, heathland, peatland or unvegetated areas according to ATKIS Basis-DLM (Geobasisdaten: © GeoBasis-DE / BKG, 2020).

Version v201:
Post-processing of the maps included a sieve filter as well as a ruleset for the reduction of non-plausible areas using the Basis-DLM and the digital terrain model of Germany (Geobasisdaten: © GeoBasis-DE / BKG, 2015).

The maps are available as cloud optimized GeoTiffs, which makes downloading the full dataset optional. All data can directly be accessed in QGIS, R, Python or any supported software of your choice using the URL that will be provided on request. By doing so the entire map area or only the regions of interest can be accessed. QGIS legend files for data visualization can be downloaded separately.

Class-specific accuracies for each year are proveded in the respective tables. We provide this dataset "as is" without any warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness and exclude all liability.

_

Mailing list

If you do not want to miss the latest updates, please enroll to our mailing list.

_

References:

Blickensdörfer, L., Schwieder, M., Pflugmacher, D., Nendel, C., Erasmi, S., & Hostert, P. (2022). Mapping of crop types and crop sequences with combined time series of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 data for Germany. Remote Sensing of Environment, 269, 112831.

BKG, Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (2015). Digitales Geländemodell Gitterweite 10 m. DGM10. https://sg.geodatenzentrum.de/web_public/gdz/dokumentation/deu/dgm10.pdf (last accessed: 28. April 2022).

BKG, Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (2020). Digitales Basis-Landschaftsmodell.
https://sg.geodatenzentrum.de/web_public/gdz/dokumentation/deu/basis-dlm.pdf (last accessed: 28. April 2022).

Frantz, D. (2019). FORCE—Landsat + Sentinel-2 Analysis Ready Data and Beyond. Remote Sensing, 11, 1124.

Statistisches Bundesamt, Deutschland (2024). Ökosystematlas Deutschland
https://oekosystematlas-ugr.destatis.de/ (last accessed: 08.02.2024).

_
National-scale crop type maps for Germany from combined time series of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat data (2017 to 2021) © 2024 by Schwieder, Marcel; Tetteh, Gideon Okpoti; Blickensdörfer, Lukas; Gocht, Alexander; Erasmi, Stefan; licensed under CC BY 4.0.

Funding was provided by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture as part of the joint project “Monitoring der biologischen Vielfalt in Agrarlandschaften” (MonViA, Monitoring of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes).

description: The Census of Agriculture provides a detailed picture every five years of U.S. farms and ranches and the people who operate them. Conducted by USDA s National Agricultural Statistics Service, the 2012 Census of Agriculture collected more than six million data items directly from farmers. The Ag Census Web Maps application makes this information available at the county level through a few clicks. The maps and accompanying data help users visualize, download, and analyze Census of Agriculture data in a geospatial context.; abstract: The Census of Agriculture provides a detailed picture every five years of U.S. farms and ranches and the people who operate them. Conducted by USDA s National Agricultural Statistics Service, the 2012 Census of Agriculture collected more than six million data items directly from farmers. The Ag Census Web Maps application makes this information available at the county level through a few clicks. The maps and accompanying data help users visualize, download, and analyze Census of Agriculture data in a geospatial context.

This dataset contains shape files and supporting files for the most up-to-date (as of the published date) land use map at the UBC Farm. The best uses of these maps are: 1) to visualize locations of field codes in other UBC Farm datasets; 2) to visualize field codes for UBC Farm research projects, and 3) to understand the general layout of the Farm.

Detailed maps of agricultural landscapes are a valuable data source for manifold applications, such as environmental modelling, biodiversity monitoring or the support of agricultural statistics. Satellites from the European Copernicus program, especially, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2, as well as the Landsat missions operated by NASA/USGS, acquire data with a spatial resolution (10 m to 30 m) that is sufficient to identify field structures in complex agricultural landscapes. Time series of combined Sentinel-2 and Landsat data facilitate to differentiate crop types with a high thematic detail based on differences in land surface phenology. However, large data gaps due to frequent cloud cover may hamper such classification approaches.

We thus combined dense interpolated times series of Sentinel-2A/B and Landsat data with monthly composites of Sentinel-1 backscatter data to overcome periods with high cloud contamination. To further account for regional variations along the agroecological gradient within Germany, we additionally included a broad set of spatially explicit environmental data in a random forest classification model.

All optical satellite data were downloaded, pre-processed and structured in an analysis-ready data (ARD) cube using the open-source software FORCE - Framework for Operational Radiometric Correction for Environmental monitoring (Frantz, D., 2019; https://force-eo.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ last accessed: 19. August 2021), before environmental and SAR data were included in the ARD cube.

For each year (2017, 2018 and 2019) we trained an individual random forest model with 24 agricultural classes. Each model was independently validated with area adjusted overall accuracies of 80% (2017), 79% (2018), and 78% (2019). Further details regarding the data and methods used as well as class wise accuracies can be found in Blickensdörfer et al. (2022).

The final models were applied to areas in Germany that were defined as agricultural land in ATKIS DLM 2018 (Geobasisdaten: © GeoBasis-DE / BKG (2018)). Post-processing of the final maps included applying a sieve filter, the exclusion of classes other than grasslands and small woody features above 900 m (based on the Digital Elevation Model for Germany BKG (2015)) and the exclusion of grapevine/hops areas that were not labelled as the respective permanent crop in ATKIS DLM (labelled as other agricultural areas in the final map).

The maps are provided as GeoTiff files together with a QGIS legend file for visualization.

Class catalogue:

10 Grassland
31 Winter wheat
32 Winter rye
33 Winter barley
34 Other winter cereal
41 Spring barley
42 Spring oat
43 Other spring cereal
50 Winter rapeseed
60 Legume
70 Sunflower
80 Sugar beet
91 Maize
92 Maize (grain)
100 Potato
110 Grapevine
120 Strawberry
130 Asparagus
140 Onion
150 Hops
160 Orchard
181 Carrot
182 Other vegetables
555 Small woody features
999 Other agricultural areas

Blickensdörfer, L., Schwieder, M., Pflugmacher, D., Nendel, C., Erasmi, S., & Hostert, P. (2022). Mapping of crop types and crop sequences with combined time series of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 data for Germany. Remote Sensing of Environment, 269, 112831

BKG, Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (2015). Digitales Geländemodell Gitterweite 10 m. DGM10. https://sg.geodatenzentrum.de/web_public/gdz/dokumentation/deu/dgm10.pdf (last accessed: 19. August 2021).

BKG, Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (2018). Digitales Basis-Landschaftsmodell.
https://sg.geodatenzentrum.de/web_public/gdz/dokumentation/deu/basis-dlm.pdf (last accessed: 19. August 2021).

Frantz, D. (2019). FORCE—Landsat + Sentinel-2 Analysis Ready Data and Beyond. Remote Sensing, 11, 1124.

National-scale crop type maps for Germany © 2021 by Blickensdörfer, Lukas; Schwieder, Marcel; Pflugmacher, Dirk; Nendel, Claas; Erasmi, Stefan; Hostert, Patrick is licensed under CC BY 4.0.

The information provided includes: file identification code, Chinese file name, interpretation data creation time, data creation time, summary, purpose, data creation status, spatial display type, theme keywords, location keywords, ground resolution, data creation scale, map joining method, map entity name, geometric object type, format name, format version, westernmost longitude, easternmost longitude, southernmost latitude, northernmost latitude, maintenance update frequency, reference system identification code, and distribution map URL, etc.

Agriculture has substantial socioeconomic and environmental impacts that vary between crops. However, information on how the spatial distribution of specific crops has changed over time across the globe is relatively sparse. We introduce the Probabilistic Cropland Allocation Model (PCAM), a novel algorithm to estimate where specific crops have likely been grown over time. Specifically, PCAM downscales annual and national-scale data on the crop-specific area harvested of 17 major crops to a global 0.5-degree grid from 1961-2014. The resulting database presented here provides annual global gridded likelihood estimates of crop-specific areas. Both mean and standard deviations of grid cell fractions are available for each of the 17 crops. Each netCDF file contains an individual year of data with an additional variable ("crs") that defines the coordinate reference system used. Our results provide new insights into the likely changes in the spatial distribution of major crops over the past half-century. For additional information, please see the related paper by Jackson et al. (2019) in Environmental Research Letters (https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3b93).

Introduction and Rationale:Due to our increasing understanding of the role the surrounding landscape plays in ecological processes, a detailed characterization of land cover, including both agricultural and natural habitats, is ever more important for both researchers and conservation practitioners. Unfortunately, in the United States, different types of land cover data are split across thematic datasets that emphasize agricultural or natural vegetation, but not both. To address this data gap and reduce duplicative efforts in geospatial processing, we merged two major datasets, the LANDFIRE National Vegetation Classification (NVC) and USDA-NASS Cropland Data Layer (CDL), to produce integrated ‘Spatial Products for Agriculture and Nature’ (SPAN). Our workflow leveraged strengths of the NVC and the CDL to produce detailed rasters comprising both agricultural and natural land-cover classes. We generated SPAN for each year from 2012-2021 for the conterminous United States, quantified agreement between input layers and accuracy of our merged product, and published the complete workflow necessary to update SPAN. In our validation analyses, we found that approximately 5.5% of NVC agricultural pixels conflicted with the CDL, but we resolved a majority of these conflicts based on surrounding agricultural land, leaving only 0.6% of agricultural pixels unresolved in the final version of SPAN.Contents:Spatial dataNational rasters of land cover in the conterminous United States: 2012-2021Rasters of pixels mismatched between CDL and NVC: 2012-2021Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: SPAN land cover in the conterminous United States: 2012-2021 - SCINet File Name: KammererNationalRasters.zip Resource Description: GeoTIFF rasters showing location of pixels that are mismatched between 2016 NVC and specific year of CDL (2012-2021). Spatial Products for Agriculture and Nature ('SPAN') land cover in the conterminous United States from 2012-2021. This raster dataset is available in GeoTIFF format and was created by joining agricultural classes from the USDA-NASS Cropland Data Layer (CDL) to national vegetation from the LANDFIRE National Vegetation Classification v2.0 ('Remap'). Pixels of national vegetation are the same in all rasters provided here and represent land cover in 2016. Agricultural pixels were taken from the CDL in the specified year, so depict agricultural land from 2012-2021. Resource Title: Rasters of pixels mismatched between CDL and NVC: 2012-2021 - SCINet File Name: MismatchedNational.zip Resource Description: GeoTIFF rasters showing location of pixels that are mismatched between 2016 NVC and specific year of CDL (2012-2021). This dataset includes pixels that were classified as agriculture in the NVC but, in the CDL, were not agriculture (or were a conflicting agricultural class). For more details, we refer users to the linked publication describing our geospatial processing and validation workflow.SCINet users: The files can be accessed/retrieved with valid SCINet account at this location: /LTS/ADCdatastorage/NAL/published/node455886/ See the SCINet File Transfer guide for more information on moving large files: https://scinet.usda.gov/guides/data/datatransferGlobus users: The files can also be accessed through Globus by following this data link. The user will need to log in to Globus in order to retrieve this data. User accounts are free of charge with several options for signing on. Instructions for creating an account are on the login page.

These GIS files represent geographic boundaries for lands that are under the protection of NYS Agricultural District Law, administered by the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets. The boundaries are derived from New York State Agricultural District, 1:24,000-scale, maps produced at county agencies. The district boundaries correspond to tax parcel data. District boundaries are joined into a file representing all of the Agricultural Districts within an entire county. Tax parcel detail is not included in this dataset. Road and utility rights-of-way are only included when they are delineated on the original 1:24,000 scale maps. Please note that boundaries may be generalizations; precise information can be obtained from the county or town tax parcel information.View Dataset on the Gateway

Provisional Agricultural Land Classification Grade. Agricultural land classified into five grades. Grade one is best quality and grade five is poorest quality. A number of consistent criteria used for assessment which include climate (temperature, rainfall, aspect, exposure, frost risk), site (gradient, micro-relief, flood risk) and soil (depth, structure, texture, chemicals, stoniness) for England only. Digitised from the published 1:250,000 map which was in turn compiled from the 1 inch to the mile maps.More information about the Agricultural Land Classification can be found at the following links:http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130402200910/http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/landmanage/land-use/documents/alc-guidelines-1988.pdfhttp://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/35012.Full metadata can be viewed on data.gov.uk.

Agricultural Mapping Software Market Outlook

The global agricultural mapping software market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 3.4 billion by 2032, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12.5% during the forecast period. This promising growth is driven by increasing adoption of precision farming techniques and the need for efficient agricultural management practices. Advances in technology, coupled with rising demand for food production, are significant factors propelling the agricultural mapping software market.

One of the primary growth factors for the agricultural mapping software market is the increasing need for precision farming. Precision farming techniques rely on detailed data collection and analysis, which is facilitated by advanced agricultural mapping software. These tools help farmers make informed decisions about planting, watering, and harvesting, thereby maximizing crop yield and resource efficiency. The emphasis on data-driven farming is expected to drive significant adoption of mapping software across the globe.

Another crucial growth factor is the rising global population, which directly correlates with the increasing demand for food. As the world population continues to grow, the pressure on agricultural systems becomes more intense. Agricultural mapping software aids in optimizing land use, monitoring crop health, and predicting yields, thus playing a pivotal role in meeting the escalating food demands. The software's ability to enhance productivity and sustainability is highly appealing to stakeholders in the agricultural sector.

Technological advancements in GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and remote sensing are also propelling the market. The integration of satellite imagery, drones, and IoT (Internet of Things) devices with agricultural mapping software enables real-time data acquisition and analysis. These technologies provide farmers with detailed insights into their fields, enabling them to detect issues early and take corrective action promptly. The continuous innovation in these technologies is expected to further boost market growth.

From a regional perspective, North America is anticipated to hold the largest market share due to the high adoption rate of advanced farming technologies and substantial investments in agricultural research. Europe follows closely, driven by stringent agricultural policies and a strong focus on sustainable farming practices. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth, attributed to increasing government initiatives to modernize agriculture and substantial investments in agritech startups. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa also present significant growth opportunities due to expanding agricultural activities and adoption of modern farming techniques.

Crop Monitoring Software plays a pivotal role in the agricultural mapping software market by providing farmers with the tools necessary to maintain and enhance crop health. This software allows for continuous observation and analysis of crops, ensuring that any potential issues such as diseases, pest infestations, or nutrient deficiencies are identified early. By leveraging real-time data, farmers can make informed decisions that lead to improved crop yields and quality. The integration of Crop Monitoring Software with other agricultural technologies further enhances its capabilities, making it an indispensable tool for modern farming practices. As the demand for efficient and sustainable agriculture grows, the adoption of such software is expected to rise, contributing significantly to the market's expansion.

Component Analysis

The agricultural mapping software market by component is divided into two primary segments: software and services. The software segment encompasses a range of solutions tailored to various agricultural needs, including GIS software, remote sensing software, and farm management software. These tools are designed to collect, analyze, and interpret data to support decision-making processes in farming operations. The sophistication and variety of available software solutions are continually expanding, driven by ongoing research and development efforts in agritech.

In contrast, the services segment includes consulting, training, maintenance, and support services that complement the software solutions. As more farmers and agricultural enterprises adopt mapp

Agro-MAPS consists of selected agricultural land-use statistics (crop production, area harvested and crop yield) aggregated by sub-national administrative districts for selected years. The full Agro-MAPS database currently contains data for 134 countries - 130 countries at admin1 level; 59 countries at admin2 level. These countries represent 92% of the world land surface. Users can interactively query and display Agro-MAPS data as maps, for a given country or region (Africa, Asia, North America, Latin America & the Caribbean, Asia, Near East in Asia, Oceania).

The data and maps from the paper "Enabling and constraining factors for organic agriculture in Europe: a spatial analysis". Based on the number of organic agricultural producer certificates collected in the study.

The Agricultural Mapping Services Market is projected to exceed USD 7.7 billion by 2035, rising from an estimated USD 5.8 billion in 2025. A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.9% has been forecast for the 2025 to 2035 period.

Semi-annual update

Country-Wise Insights

Mapping marginal agricultural lands reimagined This is an adaptation of a model from an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of the American Association of Geographers on 18 January 2018, available online at doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1403877. Reference: Peter, B.G., Messina, J.P. and Snapp, S.S., 2018. A Multiscalar Approach to Mapping Marginal Agricultural Land: Smallholder Agriculture in Malawi. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(4), pp.989-1005. In this version, MODIS NPP (net primary productivity, 1-km spatial resolution) is replaced with MODIS NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index, 250-m spatial resolution). In addition, this revised model also considers time-series slope in characterizing agricultural productivity. Previously devised using ArcPy, this updated version is written in JavaScript for Google Earth Engine. Categories L = low production; M = medium production; H = high production S = stable production; V = variable production I = increasing slope; D = decreasing slope 1 - LSI 2 - LVI 3 - LSD 4 - LVD 5 - MSI 6 - MVI 7 - MSD 8 - MVD 9 - HSI 10 - HVI 11 - HSD 12 - HVD Google Earth Engine Code var mod13q1 = ee.ImageCollection("MODIS/006/MOD13Q1"), lulc = ee.Image("ESA/GLOBCOVER_L4_200901_200912_V2_3"), countries = ee.FeatureCollection("USDOS/LSIB_SIMPLE/2017"); var startYear = 2008; var endYear = 2018; var startMonth = 11; var endMonth = 4; var country = 'Kenya'; var scale = 2500; var years = ee.List.sequence(startYear,endYear); var n = endYear-startYear+1; var ag = lulc.select('landcover').lte(30).eq(1); var region = countries.filter(ee.Filter.eq('country_na',country)); var yearly_mod13q1 = ee.ImageCollection.fromImages( years.map(function (y) { return mod13q1.filter(ee.Filter.calendarRange(y,y,'year')) .filter(ee.Filter.calendarRange(startMonth,endMonth,'month')) .select('NDVI').mean() .clip(region).updateMask(ag) .multiply(0.0001); }) ); var mean_mod13q1 = yearly_mod13q1.mean().rename('mean_mod13q1'); var stddev_mod13q1 = yearly_mod13q1.map(function(img){ return img.subtract(mean_mod13q1).pow(2); }).sum().divide(n).sqrt().rename('stddev_mod13q1'); var level_mod13q1 = mean_mod13q1.reduceRegion({ reducer: ee.Reducer.percentile([33,66]), geometry: region, scale: scale, maxPixels: 1e12 }); var var_mod13q1 = stddev_mod13q1.reduceRegion({ reducer: ee.Reducer.percentile([50]), geometry: region, scale: scale, maxPixels: 1e12 }); var lmh_mod13q1 = mean_mod13q1.gt(ee.Number(level_mod13q1.get('mean_mod13q1_p33'))) .add(mean_mod13q1.gt(ee.Number(level_mod13q1.get('mean_mod13q1_p66')))) .remap([0,1,2],[1,2,3]); var vs_mod13q1 = stddev_mod13q1.gt(ee.Number(var_mod13q1.get('stddev_mod13q1'))).remap([0,1],[10,20]); var productivity_mod13q1 = lmh_mod13q1.add(vs_mod13q1).remap([11,12,13,21,22,23],[1,4,5,2,3,6]).rename('productivity'); // 11 - LS - 1 // 12 - MS - 3 // 13 - HS - 5 // 21 - LV - 2 // 22 - MV - 4 // 23 - HV - 6 var createTimeBand = function(image) { var num = image.get('system:index'); return image.addBands(ee.Image(ee.Number.parse(num)).double()); }; var linearFit = yearly_mod13q1.map(createTimeBand).select(['constant', 'NDVI']).reduce(ee.Reducer.linearFit()).select('scale'); var slope = linearFit.gt(0).remap([0,1],[0,10]); var productivity_slope = productivity_mod13q1.add(slope).remap([1,2,3,4,5,6,11,12,13,14,15,16],[3,4,7,8,11,12,1,2,5,6,9,10]); // 1 - 3 - LSD // 2 - 4 - LVD // 3 - 7 - MSD // 4 - 8 - MVD // 5 - 11 - HSD // 6 - 12 - HVD // 11 - 1 - LSI // 12 - 2 - LVI // 13 - 5 - MSI // 14 - 6 - MVI // 15 - 9 - HSI // 16 - 10 - HVI Map.centerObject(region); Map.setOptions('HYBRID'); var sColors = ['fecc5c','fd8d3c','f03b20','bd0026','a1dab4','41b6c4','2c7fb8','253494','c2e699','78c679','31a354','006837']; Map.addLayer(ee.Image(0),{palette:'black', opacity: 0.75},'dark basemap'); Map.addLayer(productivity_slope,{min:1,max:12,palette:sColors},'productivity slope'); var categories = ['Low-Stable-Increasing', 'Low-Variable-Increasing', 'Low-Stable-Decreasing', 'Low-Variable-Decreasing', 'Medium-Stable-Increasing', 'Medium-Variable-Increasing', 'Medium-Stable-Decreasing', 'Medium-Variable-Decreasing', 'High-Stable-Increasing', 'High-Variable-Increasing', 'High-Stable-Decreasing', 'High-Variable-Decreasing']; var legend = ui.Panel({ style: { position: 'bottom-left', backgroundColor: '202020', padding: '8px 15px', border: '5px solid #333333' } }); var legendTitle = ui.Label({ value: 'Agricultural productivity', style: { fontWeight: 'bold', fontSize: '18px', margin: '3px 0 -1px 8px', backgroundColor: '202020', color: 'dbdbdb', padding: '0' } }); var line = ui.Label({ value: '_', style: { fontSize: '10px', margin: '0 0 10px 1px', backgroundColor: '202020', color: 'dbdbdb', padding: '0' } }); legend.add(legendTitle); legend.add(line); var makeRow = function(color, name) { var colorBox = ui.Label({ style: { backgroundColor: '#' + color, padding: '8px', margin: '0 0 4px 0' } }); var description...

The Agriculture Capability mapping dataset is the digitized equivalent of the legacy Agriculture Capability Scanned Maps, which date from the 1960's to the 1990s. Agriculture Capability mapping is also known as 'Soil Capability for Agriculture' and 'Agricultural Capability' mapping. Agricultural Capability is an interpreted mapping product based on soil and climate information. In general, climate determines the range of crops possible in an area and the soils determine the type and relative level of management practices required. This is legacy data and changes in climate are not reflected. For more information about the classification system see: Land Capability Classification for Agriculture. Use caution utilizing these legacy maps as the classifications were based on common land management practices and typical crops of the 1960s-1990s era, and subsequent site specific land management practices (e.g. installation of drainage) may have modified the soil conditions since the mapping was completed. This Agriculture Capability legacy mapping is included in the Soil Information Finder Tool (SIFT) mapping application. The SIFT application provides more detailed climate data (e.g. Growing Degree Days, Frost Free Period (5 C), (1960-1990 climate normals). The SIFT 'Soil query tools' may be useful for identifying areas with specific 'growing conditions' of interest based on soils present (soil name), soil texture, drainage, coarse fragment content, slope, elevation, growing degree days and frost free period. Note: This Agriculture Capability Mapping dataset is based on soil mapping at 1:100,000, 1:50,000 or 1:20,000 scale, and is more detailed than the 1:250,000 scale Canada Land Inventory (CLI) Agricultural Capability mapping (available here).

Statistics Canada conducts the Census of Agriculture every five years at the same time as the Census of Population. The most recent Census of Agriculture was on May 15, 2001.The Census of Agriculture collects and disseminates a wide range of data on the agriculture industry such as number and type of farms, farm operator characteristics, business operating arrangements, land management practices, crop areas, numbers of livestock and poultry, farm capital, operating expenses and receipts, and farm machinery and equipment. These data provide a comprehensive picture of the agriculture industry across Canada every five years at the national and provincial levels as well as at lower levels of geography. The Census of Agriculture is the cornerstone of Canada's Agriculture Statistics Program. Census of Agriculture data are an indispensable public and private sector tool for analysing important changes in the agriculture and food industries;developing, implementing and evaluating agricultural policies and programs such as farm income safety nets and environmental sustainability; and making production, marketing and investment decisions. Statistics Canada uses the data as benchmarks for its regular surveys on crops, livestock and farm finances between census years. In addition, data extracted from the unique Agriculture Population Linkage Database, which links data from both the Census of Population and Census of Agriculture databases, paint a socio-economic portrait not only of farm operators but also of their families and households. This release contains all farm data and farm operations data plus selected historical files. In 2001, a census farm was defined as an agricultural operation that produces at least one of the following products intended for sale: crops (hay, field crops, tree fruits or nuts, berries or grapes, vegetables, seed); livestock (cattle, pigs, sheep, horses, game animals, other livestock); poultry (hens, chickens, turkeys, chicks, game birds, other poultry); animal products (milk or cream, eggs, wool, furs, meat); or other agricultural products (Christmas trees, greenhouse or nursery products, mushrooms, sod, honey, maple syrup products). For 2001, a new farm type classification based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) has been added to the historical classification used in previous censuses. All tabulated data are subject to confidentiality restrictions prior to release. Due to confidentiality constraints, data for those geographic areas with very few agricultural operations are not released separately, but rather merged with a geographically adjacent area.