100+ datasets found
  1. County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +1more
    Updated May 7, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2025). County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable Beneficiaries [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/county-level-aggregate-expenditure-and-risk-score-data-on-assignable-beneficiaries-78c64
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 7, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
    Description

    The Shared Savings Program County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable Beneficiaries Public Use File (PUF) for the Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program) provides aggregate data consisting of per capita Parts A and B FFS expenditures, average CMS-HCC prospective risk scores, average demographic risk scores and total person-years for Shared Savings Program assignable beneficiaries by Medicare enrollment type (End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), disabled, aged/dual eligible, aged/non-dual eligible). DISCLAIMER: This information is current as of the last update. Changes to Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organization (ACO) information occur periodically. Each Shared Savings Program ACO has the most up-to-date information about their organization. Consider contacting the Shared Savings Program ACO for the latest information. Contact information is available in the ACO PUF and the ACO Participants PUF.

  2. f

    Data from: Prediction of Protein Aggregation Propensity via Data-Driven...

    • acs.figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Oct 16, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Seungpyo Kang; Minseon Kim; Jiwon Sun; Myeonghun Lee; Kyoungmin Min (2023). Prediction of Protein Aggregation Propensity via Data-Driven Approaches [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01001.s002
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    ACS Publications
    Authors
    Seungpyo Kang; Minseon Kim; Jiwon Sun; Myeonghun Lee; Kyoungmin Min
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Protein aggregation occurs when misfolded or unfolded proteins physically bind together and can promote the development of various amyloid diseases. This study aimed to construct surrogate models for predicting protein aggregation via data-driven methods using two types of databases. First, an aggregation propensity score database was constructed by calculating the scores for protein structures in the Protein Data Bank using Aggrescan3D 2.0. Moreover, feature- and graph-based models for predicting protein aggregation have been developed by using this database. The graph-based model outperformed the feature-based model, resulting in an R2 of 0.95, although it intrinsically required protein structures. Second, for the experimental data, a feature-based model was built using the Curated Protein Aggregation Database 2.0 to predict the aggregated intensity curves. In summary, this study suggests approaches that are more effective in predicting protein aggregation, depending on the type of descriptor and the database.

  3. Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Dec 3, 1996
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.; Smith, Renee M. (1996). Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01119.v1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 1996
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.; Smith, Renee M.
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/1119/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/1119/terms

    Time period covered
    1953 - 1992
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Despite extensive research into the nature and determinants of party identification, links between individual-level partisan persistence and the degree of permanence in aggregate-level partisanship have largely been ignored. The failure to link the two levels of analysis leaves a gap in our collective understanding of the dynamics of aggregate partisanship. To remedy this, a set of ideal types are identified in this collection that capture the essential arguments made about individual-level party identification. The behavioral assumptions for each ideal type are then combined with existing results on statistical aggregation to deduce the specific temporal pattern that each ideal type implies for aggregate levels of partisanship. Using new diagnostic tests and a highly general time series model, the investigators found that aggregate measures of partisanship from 1953 through 1992 are fractionally integrated. The evidence that the effects of a shock to aggregate partisanship last for years -- not months or decades -- challenges previous work by party systems theorists (e.g., Burnham, 1970) and students of "macropartisanship" (e.g., MacKuen, Erikson, and Stimson, 1989). The arguments and empirical evidence of the degree of persistence in macro-level partisanship provides a conceptually richer and empirically more precise basis for existing theories -- such as those of issue evolution (Carmines and Stimson, 1989) or endogenous preferences (Gerber and Jackson, 1993) -- in which partisanship plays a central role.

  4. J

    Age–period–cohort decomposition of aggregate data: an application to US and...

    • journaldata.zbw.eu
    • jda-test.zbw.eu
    txt
    Updated Dec 8, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kosei Fukuda; Kosei Fukuda (2022). Age–period–cohort decomposition of aggregate data: an application to US and Japanese household saving rates (replication data) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15456/jae.2022319.0712563031
    Explore at:
    txt(1356), txt(1606), txt(748)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 8, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    ZBW - Leibniz Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
    Authors
    Kosei Fukuda; Kosei Fukuda
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This paper compares two methods of analyzing aggregate data that is classified by period and age. Because there is a linear relationship among age, period, and cohort, it is not possible to distinguish the separate effects without employing an identifying assumption. The first method, which is applied in the economics literature, assumes that period effects are orthogonal to a linear time trend. The second method, which is applied in the statistics literature, assumes that the effect parameters change gradually. Simulation results suggest that the performances of both methods are comparable. The results of applying the second method to household saving rates suggest that period effects had a negligible influence in the United States but considerable influence in Japan.

  5. d

    Motor City Mapping, Certified Results, Winter 2013-14 ( Census Tract...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.ferndalemi.gov
    • +4more
    Updated Feb 21, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Driven Detroit (2025). Motor City Mapping, Certified Results, Winter 2013-14 ( Census Tract Aggregation) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/motor-city-mapping-certified-results-winter-2013-14-census-tract-aggregation-3ccba
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Data Driven Detroit
    Description

    In the fall of 2013, the Detroit Blight Removal Task Force commissioned Data Driven Detroit, the Michigan Nonprofit Association, and LOVELAND Technologies to conduct a survey of every parcel in the City of Detroit. The goal of the survey was to collect data on property condition and vacancy. The effort, called Motor City Mapping, leveraged relationships with the Rock Ventures family of companies and the Detroit Employment Solutions Corporation to assemble a dedicated team of over 200 resident surveyors, drivers, and quality control associates. Data collection occurred from December 4, 2013 until February 16, 2014, and the initiative resulted in survey information for over 370,000 parcels of land in the city of Detroit, identifying condition, occupancy, and use. The data were then extensively reviewed by the Motor City Mapping quality control team, a process that concluded on September 30, 2014. This file contains the official certified results from the Winter 2013/2014 survey, aggregated to 2010 Census Tracts for easy mapping and analysis. The topics covered in the dataset include totals and calculated percentages for parcels in the categories of illegal dumping, fire damage, structural condition, existence of a structure or accessory structure, and improvements on lots without structures.Metadata associated with this file includes field description metadata and a narrative summary documenting the process of creating the dataset.

  6. f

    Results of the analyses of aggregate data summed over all crops for each...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 8, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nicholas W. Calderone (2023). Results of the analyses of aggregate data summed over all crops for each year. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037235.t006
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nicholas W. Calderone
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    1Yield calculated as tonnes/hectare from production data and cultivated hectares; DD = directly dependent crops; ID = indirectly dependent crops; df = 1 all effects; na = not applicable.

  7. a

    MSOA aggregated PTAL stats 2023

    • gis-tfl.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Transport for London (2025). MSOA aggregated PTAL stats 2023 [Dataset]. https://gis-tfl.opendata.arcgis.com/items/20cf34d949404dd9bffe48c0b5e31b8b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Transport for London
    Area covered
    Description

    Public Transport Accessibility Levels (PTAL) are aggregated at the Middle Super Output Area (MSOA) level, a standard geographical unit in the UK. This dataset includes summary statistics (min, max, and mean PTAL scores) per MSOA. The aggregation is based on Access Index values of PTAL (Public Transport Accessibility Level) dataset. PTAL dataset measures accessibility to public transport services across Greater London using a 100m x 100m grid resolution. PTAL scores are derived from walking times to nearby public transport services and service frequencies. This granular dataset is aggregated to the MSOA level. The mean of PTAL is calculated based on access indices of grid centroids within each MSOA and classified into six PTAL categories again. Similarly, the minimum and maximum values are identified using grid centroids within each MSOA. The spatial boundary layer displaying MSOAs on the map sourced from Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0.

  8. Z

    First Street Aggregated Flood Risk Summary Statistics Version 1.3

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Jun 17, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    First Street Foundation (2024). First Street Aggregated Flood Risk Summary Statistics Version 1.3 [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_5019025
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 17, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    First Street Foundation
    Description

    This dataset includes First Street's aggregated flood risk summary statistics. The data is available in CSV format and is aggregated at the congressional district, county, and zip code level. The data allows you to compare FSF data with FEMA data. You can also view aggregated flood risk statistics for various modeled return periods (5-, 100-, and 500-year) and see how risk changes due to climate change (compare FSF 2020 and 2050 data). There are various Flood Factor risk score aggregations available including the average risk score for all properties (flood factor risk scores 1-10) and the average risk score for properties with risk (i.e. flood factor risk scores of 2 or greater). This is version 1.3 of the data and it covers the 48 contiguous United States. There will be updated versions to follow.

    If you are interested in acquiring First Street flood data, you can request to access the data here. More information on First Street's flood risk statistics can be found here and information on First Street's hazards can be found here.

  9. a

    LSOA aggregated PTAL stats 2023

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • gis-tfl.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Transport for London (2025). LSOA aggregated PTAL stats 2023 [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/3eb38b75667a49df9ef1240e9a197615
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Transport for London
    Description

    Public Transport Accessibility Levels (PTAL) are aggregated at the Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA) level, a standard geographical unit in the UK. This dataset includes summary statistics (min, max, and mean PTAL scores) per LSOA. The aggregation is based on Access Index values of PTAL (Public Transport Accessibility Level) dataset. PTAL dataset measures accessibility to public transport services across Greater London using a 100m x 100m grid resolution. PTAL scores are derived from walking times to nearby public transport services and service frequencies. This granular dataset is aggregated to the LSOA level. The mean of PTAL is calculated based on access indices of grid centroids within each LSOA and classified into six PTAL categories again. Similarly, the minimum and maximum values are identified using grid centroids within each LSOA.The spatial boundary layer displaying LSOAs on the map sourced from Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0.

  10. f

    Results of the analyses of aggregate data summed over all crops for each...

    • figshare.com
    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nicholas W. Calderone (2023). Results of the analyses of aggregate data summed over all crops for each year. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037235.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nicholas W. Calderone
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    1millions; DD = directly dependent crops; ID = indirectly dependent crops; x = year; na = not applicable; df = 1 all effects.

  11. Main structural results by Type of indicator and Educational level...

    • ine.es
    csv, html, json +4
    Updated Sep 15, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    INE - Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2014). Main structural results by Type of indicator and Educational level (aggregate) [Dataset]. https://www.ine.es/jaxi/Tabla.htm?tpx=26263&L=1
    Explore at:
    xls, json, xlsx, txt, text/pc-axis, csv, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 15, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    National Statistics Institutehttp://www.ine.es/
    Authors
    INE - Instituto Nacional de Estadística
    License

    https://www.ine.es/aviso_legalhttps://www.ine.es/aviso_legal

    Variables measured
    Type of indicator, Educational level (aggregate)
    Description

    Private Education Financing and Expenditure Statistic: Main structural results by Type of indicator and Educational level (aggregate). National.

  12. f

    Dataset for: Meta-analysis of aggregate data on medical events

    • wiley.figshare.com
    txt
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Björn Holzhauer (2023). Dataset for: Meta-analysis of aggregate data on medical events [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4204932.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Wiley
    Authors
    Björn Holzhauer
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Meta-analyses of clinical trials often treat the number of patients experiencing a medical event as binomially distributed when individual patient data for fitting standard time-to-event models are unavailable. Assuming identical drop-out time distributions across arms, random censorship and low proportions of patients with an event, a binomial approach results in a valid test of the null hypothesis of no treatment effect with minimal loss in efficiency compared to time-to-event methods. To deal with differences in follow-up - at the cost of assuming specific distributions for event and drop-out times - we propose a hierarchical multivariate meta-analysis model using the aggregate data likelihood based on the number of cases, fatal cases and discontinuations in each group, as well as the planned trial duration and groups sizes. Such a model also enables exchangeability assumptions about parameters of survival distributions, for which they are more appropriate than for the expected proportion of patients with an event across trials of substantially different length. Borrowing information from other trials within a meta-analysis or from historical data is particularly useful for rare events data. Prior information or exchangeability assumptions also avoid the parameter identifiability problems that arise when using more flexible event and drop-out time distributions than the exponential one. We discuss the derivation of robust historical priors and illustrate the discussed methods using an example. We also compare the proposed approach against other aggregate data meta-analysis methods in a simulation study.

  13. H

    Replication Data for: Advisers and Aggregation in Foreign Policy...

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Oct 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tyler Jost; Joshua Kertzer; Eric Min; Robert Schub (2023). Replication Data for: Advisers and Aggregation in Foreign Policy Decision-Making [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GZW94R
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Oct 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Tyler Jost; Joshua Kertzer; Eric Min; Robert Schub
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Data and code necessary to replicate the results of the article "Advisers and Aggregation in Foreign Policy Decision-Making" and its supplementary material.

  14. Aggregate Potential Mapping Ireland (ROI) ITM - Dataset - data.gov.ie

    • data.gov.ie
    Updated Oct 19, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.gov.ie (2021). Aggregate Potential Mapping Ireland (ROI) ITM - Dataset - data.gov.ie [Dataset]. https://data.gov.ie/dataset/aggregate-potential-mapping-ireland-roi-itm
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 19, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    data.gov.ie
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Ireland, Ireland
    Description

    These maps shows the aggregate potential across Ireland. To produce these maps, scores were given to each area based on several factors such as rock type suitability, number of quarries, area, elevation etc. The final score was a number between 5 and 100 The maps shows the scores sorted into five different ranges; * Very High potential - red * High potential - orange * Moderate Potential - yellow * Low Potential - green * Very Low Potential - blue Aggregate maps include:Granular and Crushed Rock. Also available are: Sand and gravel deposits. Pits and Quarry Locations.

  15. o

    Replication data for: The Relative Importance of Aggregate and Sectoral...

    • openicpsr.org
    Updated Jan 1, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Julio Garin; Michael J. Pries; Eric R. Sims (2018). Replication data for: The Relative Importance of Aggregate and Sectoral Shocks and the Changing Nature of Economic Fluctuations [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E116397V1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    American Economic Association
    Authors
    Julio Garin; Michael J. Pries; Eric R. Sims
    Description

    A principal components decomposition of sectoral IP data reveals that the contribution of aggregate shocks to the variance of aggregate output declined from about 70 percent in the period 1967–1983 to about 30 percent after 1983. We develop an "islands" model with two sectors and costly labor reallocation to investigate how this change in the relative importance of shocks alters business cycle moments. A version of the model with relatively more important sectoral shocks results in a sizeable decline in the cyclicality of labor productivity and is consistent with changes in several other business cycle moments observed in the data.

  16. Competitiveness index scores of CIS countries 2018-2019

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 15, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2021). Competitiveness index scores of CIS countries 2018-2019 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1087150/competitiveness-index-score-cis-countries/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Russia
    Description

    In 2019, Russia's aggregate score in the global competitiveness index reached 66.7 points, which was the highest figure among other countries in the CIS region. The most significant improvement was observed for Azerbaijan, with an increase by 1.6 points from 2018 to 2019.

  17. Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual...

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • search.datacite.org
    Updated May 16, 1997
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    King, Gary (1997). Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01132.v1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 16, 1997
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    King, Gary
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/1132/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/1132/terms

    Description

    These data make it possible to replicate all numerical results in Gary King (1997), A SOLUTION TO THE ECOLOGICAL INFERENCE PROBLEM: RECONSTRUCTING INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR FROM AGGREGATE DATA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  18. Z

    Data and results for "Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    Updated Feb 6, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jaakkola, Tommi (2024). Data and results for "Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models" [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_10611035
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Jaakkola, Tommi
    Barzilay, Regina
    Bao, Yujia
    Wu, Menghua
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Datasets and results associated with "Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models"

  19. County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable...

    • healthdata.gov
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Apr 8, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable Beneficiaries - 32ca-k66z - Archive Repository [Dataset]. https://healthdata.gov/w/xrq4-r5xj/default?cur=m-oOQ14UUOq&from=W3p2ttsbYKS
    Explore at:
    xml, json, application/rssxml, tsv, csv, application/rdfxmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 8, 2022
    Description

    This dataset tracks the updates made on the dataset "County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable Beneficiaries" as a repository for previous versions of the data and metadata.

  20. J

    Aggregation is not the solution: the PPP puzzle strikes back (replication...

    • journaldata.zbw.eu
    txt
    Updated Dec 8, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    M. Dolores Gadea; Laura Mayoral; M. Dolores Gadea; Laura Mayoral (2022). Aggregation is not the solution: the PPP puzzle strikes back (replication data) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15456/jae.2022319.1306919679
    Explore at:
    txt(1419), txt(2858), txt(15889), txt(35991), txt(21647), txt(244884)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 8, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    ZBW - Leibniz Informationszentrum Wirtschaft
    Authors
    M. Dolores Gadea; Laura Mayoral; M. Dolores Gadea; Laura Mayoral
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Recently, Imbs, Mumtaz, Ravn and Rey (2005, hereinafter IMRR) have argued that much of the purchasing power parity (PPP) puzzle is due to upwardly biased estimates of persistence. According to them, the source of the bias is the existence of heterogeneous price adjustment dynamics at the sectoral level that established time series or panel data methods fail to control for. This paper re-examines this claim in two steps. Firstly, we demonstrate that IMRR's measures of sectoral persistence are systematically downwardly biased because they are based on an inaccurate definition of the average impulse response function (IRF). We then show that standard estimates of shock persistence are recovered after this bias is corrected. Secondly, building on the results in Mayoral (2008), which prove that aggregate and micro models induce the same shock persistence behavior, we show that estimates based on aggregate and sectoral exchange rates are, in fact, highly consistent. Thus, aggregation is not the solution to the PPP puzzle.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2025). County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable Beneficiaries [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/county-level-aggregate-expenditure-and-risk-score-data-on-assignable-beneficiaries-78c64
Organization logo

County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable Beneficiaries

Explore at:
Dataset updated
May 7, 2025
Dataset provided by
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Description

The Shared Savings Program County-level Aggregate Expenditure and Risk Score Data on Assignable Beneficiaries Public Use File (PUF) for the Medicare Shared Savings Program (Shared Savings Program) provides aggregate data consisting of per capita Parts A and B FFS expenditures, average CMS-HCC prospective risk scores, average demographic risk scores and total person-years for Shared Savings Program assignable beneficiaries by Medicare enrollment type (End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), disabled, aged/dual eligible, aged/non-dual eligible). DISCLAIMER: This information is current as of the last update. Changes to Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organization (ACO) information occur periodically. Each Shared Savings Program ACO has the most up-to-date information about their organization. Consider contacting the Shared Savings Program ACO for the latest information. Contact information is available in the ACO PUF and the ACO Participants PUF.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu