In 2024, agricultural products with a cumulated value of approximately *** billion U.S. dollars were exported from China, an increase of *** percent compared to the previous year. Generally, the value of agricultural imports to China is considerably higher than that of exports.

Exports of Agricultural Products in China increased to 14831496.56 USD Thousand in February from 9399700.33 USD Thousand in December of 2023. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for China Exports of Agricultural Products.

In 2024, oil products and animal feed remained the largest import category to China, with an import value of about **** billion U.S. dollars were imported to China. That year, Brazil supplied the most agricultural products to China.

China Import: Agriculture Product data was reported at 13.745 USD bn in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 13.747 USD bn for Feb 2025. China Import: Agriculture Product data is updated monthly, averaging 10.231 USD bn from Jan 2007 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 219 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 22.879 USD bn in May 2023 and a record low of 2.014 USD bn in Feb 2007. China Import: Agriculture Product data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by General Administration of Customs. The data is categorized under China Premium Database’s International Trade – Table CN.JA: USD: Import by Major Commodity: Value.

Imports of Agricultural Products in China increased to 35958317.26 USD Thousand in February from 20700855.47 USD Thousand in December of 2023. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for China Imports of Agricultural Products.

Note: Updates to this data product are discontinued. The China agricultural and economic database is a collection of agricultural-related data from official statistical publications of the People's Republic of China. Analysts and policy professionals around the world need information about the rapidly changing Chinese economy, but statistics are often published only in China and sometimes only in Chinese-language publications. This product assembles a wide variety of data items covering agricultural production, inputs, prices, food consumption, output of industrial products relevant to the agricultural sector, and macroeconomic data.

In 2024, China imported approximately **** billion U.S. dollars worth of agricultural products from the United States. After an impressive rebound in 2020 and 2021, agricultural imports from the U.S. declined again in 2023 and 2024.

In 2024, China imported approximately **** billion U.S. dollars worth of agricultural products from Brazil. Over the last decade, Brazil has become the largest supplier of agricultural products to China. Imports from the United States have also rebounded after a low in 2019.

China Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Vegetable data was reported at 104.300 Prev Week=100 in 22 Jul 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 103.000 Prev Week=100 for 15 Jul 2018. China Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Vegetable data is updated daily, averaging 100.000 Prev Week=100 from May 2010 (Median) to 22 Jul 2018, with 386 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 113.600 Prev Week=100 in 31 Jan 2016 and a record low of 89.300 Prev Week=100 in 04 Mar 2018. China Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Vegetable data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. The data is categorized under China Premium Database’s Inflation – Table CN.IC: Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Weekly.

In 2024, imports of agricultural products in China decreased by *** percent, reaching a total value of approximately ***** billion U.S. dollars. Over the last 15 years, imports of agricultural imports to China indicated higher growth rates than exports for most of the years.

The Chinese agricultural product dryer market reduced modestly to $122M in 2024, shrinking by -3.2% against the previous year. In general, consumption, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. Agricultural product dryer consumption peaked at $174M in 2021; however, from 2022 to 2024, consumption failed to regain momentum.

China Agricultural Product Price Index 200: Wholesale: Food Basket data was reported at 97.300 2015=100 in 22 Jul 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 95.460 2015=100 for 15 Jul 2018. China Agricultural Product Price Index 200: Wholesale: Food Basket data is updated daily, averaging 99.910 2015=100 from Jan 2017 (Median) to 22 Jul 2018, with 80 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 119.630 2015=100 in 25 Feb 2018 and a record low of 91.630 2015=100 in 16 Jul 2017. China Agricultural Product Price Index 200: Wholesale: Food Basket data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. The data is categorized under China Premium Database’s Inflation – Table CN.IC: Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Weekly.

Forecast: Import of Dryers for Agricultural Products to China 2024 - 2028 Discover more data with ReportLinker!

In 202`, approximately *** billion yuan-worth agricultural products were sold via e-commerce platforms in China, rising from less than *** billion yuan in the previous year. The scale of agricultural products sold online is expected to reach *** billion yuan by the end of 2025.

Eximpedia Export import trade data lets you search trade data and active Exporters, Importers, Buyers, Suppliers, manufacturers exporters from over 209 countries

China and Australia signed the Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) in 2015, which aims to eliminate or reduce trade barriers between countries through tariffs or quotas. Eliminating trade barriers has expanded China’s agricultural imports from Australia. ChAFTA will strengthen the trade relationship between the two countries, enabling agricultural product imports to have a trade creation effect. This article systematically evaluates the trade effects of ChAFTA on the scale of China’s agricultural product imports based on data from 2000 to 2020. Two statistical methods, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) are applied to estimate the trade effects of agreements. Empirical studies have shown that ChAFTA has a significant trade creation effect on China’s agricultural product imports, while the trade diversion effect is insignificant. When time fixed effects and export country fixed effects are controlled, the PPML method exhibits stronger explanatory power compared to OLS and the estimated trade creation effect is more significant. The empirical research results remain robust even after considering the impact of WTO. There are no endogeneity issues in the results after adding lead variables. By incorporating lagged terms, we find there is no phase-in effect. Empirical research on heterogeneity analysis of agricultural product classification found that ChAFTA had the most significant impact on the import of forest products and aquatic products, followed by textiles and agricultural products.

These data are collected from studies looking at Chinese training courses for African officials, Chinese trade in agricultural commodities with Africa, and registered Chinese investments in Africa. These formed an important contextualisation of our research in the four case study countries which we then built upon in our fieldwork. Those final analyses and interpretations of the data are also included as data here in the form of working papers. Based on qualitative research methods, they present the reality on the ground which can often be quite different to the image presented by the raw figures, often published by government departments.The “China and Brazil in African Agriculture” (CBAA) project will explore the new development cooperation engagements in agriculture across four African countries. The project will examine the politics of aid and investment policy in China and Brazil, exploring how understandings of agricultural development are translated in aid and investment projects. The project will be carried out through an innovative international partnership connecting researchers from institutions in the UK and Africa, already linked through the IDS-led Future Agricultures Consortium, with colleagues from China and Brazil. The research will begin with a mapping phase that will generate a geo-referenced database of Chinese and Brazilian agricultural development cooperation projects in Ethiopia, Ghana, Mozambique and Zimbabwe. This will be followed by in-depth case studies of a sample of these projects, examining the ways in which experience and expertise from China and Brazil engage with the realities of African agriculture and the perspectives of African scientists and farmers. Comparative analysis across projects, countries and types of intervention will address the question of whether a new paradigm of development cooperation is emerging, and assess the implications for the future of aid and investment policy. Data on trade were collected and aggregated from the United Nations Commission for Trade and Development website. More specifically this looked at Trade matrices by product groups in exports and imports in thousands of USD between the years 1995 and 2012. This aimed to understand which agricultural commodities were most important for our four case study countries both in terms of their exports to China and Brazil, but also in terms of imports. Data on Chinese investments in Ethiopia and Africa more generally were collected from investment agencies and Chinese state institutions. Data on Chinese training courses were sourced from the official website of the Academy for International Business Officials – a training centre that is managed by the Chinese government’s Ministry of Commerce. All of these datasets were then complemented by participant observations and semi-structured interviews with key groups and individuals. These were conducted during fieldwork over several months by our research team of roughly 25 people, spread out across the four African case study countries, as well as China and Brazil. In each case, one or more of our research partners was from the country in question and was therefore able to facilitate much better access and communicative exchanges. The aim of these qualitative research methods was not only to corroborate what we had found in the quantitative data mentioned above, but also to better understand the nature of engagements between African actors with their Brazilian or Chinese counterparts. These micro-level understandings were key to interpreting the wider political-economic trends that the data highlighted.

Forecast: Share of MPS Commodities in Total Value of Agricultural Production in China 2024 - 2028 Discover more data with ReportLinker!

China Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Livestock Product: Beef data was reported at 99.800 Prev Week=100 in 22 Jul 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 100.300 Prev Week=100 for 15 Jul 2018. China Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Livestock Product: Beef data is updated daily, averaging 100.100 Prev Week=100 from May 2010 (Median) to 22 Jul 2018, with 385 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 103.500 Prev Week=100 in 17 Feb 2013 and a record low of 96.100 Prev Week=100 in 05 Feb 2012. China Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Livestock Product: Beef data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. The data is categorized under China Premium Database’s Inflation – Table CN.IC: Agricultural Product Price Index: Wholesale: Weekly.

In 2024, China exported approximately **** billion U.S. dollars worth of agricultural products to other Asian countries or territories. Exports to Hong Kong amounted to around **** billion U.S. dollars that year.