A Home for Everyone is the City of Boise’s (city) initiative to address needs in the community by supporting the development and preservation of housing affordable to residents on Boise budgets. A Home for Everyone has three core goals: produce new homes affordable at 60% of area median income, create permanent supportive housing for households experiencing homelessness, and preserve home affordable at 80% of area median income. This dataset includes information about all homes that count toward the city’s Home for Everyone goals.

While the “produce affordable housing” and “create permanent supportive housing” goals are focused on supporting the development of new housing, the preservation goal is focused on maintaining existing housing affordable. As a result, many of the data fields related to new development are not relevant to preservation projects. For example, zoning incentives are only applicable to new construction projects.

Data may be unavailable for some projects and details are subject to change until construction is complete. Addresses are excluded for projects with fewer than five homes for privacy reasons.

The dataset includes details on the number of “homes”. We use the word "home" to refer to any single unit of housing regardless of size, type, or whether it is rented or owned. For example, a building with 40 apartments counts as 40 homes, and a single detached house counts as one home.

The dataset includes details about the phase of each project when a project involves constructing new housing. The process for building a new development is as follows: First, one must receive approval from the city’s Planning Division, which is also known as being “entitled.” Next, one must apply for and receive a permit from the city’s Building Division before beginning construction. Finally, once construction is complete and all city inspections have been passed, the building can be occupied.

To contribute to a city goal, homes must meet affordability requirements based on a standard called area median income. The city considers housing affordable if is targeted to households earning at or below 80% of the area median income. For a three-person household in Boise, that equates to an annual income of $60,650 and monthly housing cost of $1,516. Deeply affordable housing sets the income limit at 60% of area median income, or even 30% of area median income. See Boise Income Guidelines for more details.Project Name – The name of each project. If a row is related to the Home Improvement Loan program, that row aggregates data for all homes that received a loan in that quarter or year. Primary Address – The primary address for the development. Some developments encompass multiple addresses.Project Address(es) – Includes all addresses that are included as part of the development project.Parcel Number(s) – The identification code for all parcels of land included in the development.Acreage – The number of acres for the parcel(s) included in the project.Planning Permit Number – The identification code for all permits the development has received from the Planning Division for the City of Boise. The number and types of permits required vary based on the location and type of development.Date Entitled – The date a development was approved by the City’s Planning Division.Building Permit Number – The identification code for all permits the development has received from the city’s Building Division.Date Building Permit Issued – Building permits are required to begin construction on a development.Date Final Certificate of Occupancy Issued – A certificate of occupancy is the final approval by the city for a development, once construction is complete. Not all developments require a certificate of occupancy.Studio – The number of homes in the development that are classified as a studio. A studio is typically defined as a home in which there is no separate bedroom. A single room serves as both a bedroom and a living room.1-Bedroom – The number of homes in a development that have exactly one bedroom.2-Bedroom – The number of homes in a development that have exactly two bedrooms.3-Bedroom – The number of homes in a development that have exactly three bedrooms.4+ Bedroom – The number of homes in a development that have four or more bedrooms.# of Total Project Units – The total number of homes in the development.# of units toward goals – The number of homes in a development that contribute to either the city’s goal to produce housing affordable at or under 60% of area median income, or the city’s goal to create permanent supportive housing for households experiencing homelessness. Rent at or under 60% AMI - The number of homes in a development that are required to be rented at or below 60% of area median income. See the description of the dataset above for an explanation of area median income or see Boise Income Guidelines for more details. Boise defines a home as “affordable” if it is rented or sold at or below 80% of area median income.Rent 61-80% AMI – The number of homes in a development that are required to be rented at between 61% and 80% of area median income. See the description of the dataset above for an explanation of area median income or see Boise Income Guidelines for more details. Boise defines a home as “affordable” if it is rented or sold at or below 80% of area median income.Rent 81-120% AMI - The number of homes in a development that are required to be rented at between 81% and 120% of area median income. See the description of the dataset above for an explanation of area median income or see Boise Income Guidelines for more details.Own at or under 60% AMI - The number of homes in a development that are required to be sold at or below 60% of area median income. See the description of the dataset above for an explanation of area median income or see Boise Income Guidelines for more details. Boise defines a home as “affordable” if it is rented or sold at or below 80% of area median income.

This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 2011 to 2023 for Aim High School vs. Washington and Snohomish School District

Application Infrastructure and Middleware (AIM) Software Market Outlook

The global Application Infrastructure and Middleware (AIM) software market size is anticipated to experience significant growth over the forecast period from 2024 to 2032. In 2023, the market was valued at approximately USD 40 billion, and with a projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7%, it is expected to reach around USD 68 billion by 2032. This robust growth trajectory is underpinned by multiple factors, including the increasing digitization of business processes, the proliferation of cloud computing technologies, and the rising need for seamless integration across various applications and systems within enterprise environments.

One of the primary growth drivers in the AIM software market is the increasing demand for advanced integration tools that facilitate seamless communication and functionality across disparate systems and applications. In today's fast-paced digital world, businesses are increasingly relying on complex arrays of software and applications to drive efficiency and innovation. Middleware solutions serve as critical enablers in this ecosystem by allowing different applications to interact seamlessly, thus enabling businesses to streamline operations, improve customer experiences, and reduce operational costs. The growing complexity and diversity of enterprise IT environments further enhance the need for robust middleware solutions.

Cloud computing is another critical factor contributing to the growth of the AIM software market. As organizations increasingly adopt cloud-based architectures, the demand for cloud-compatible middleware solutions has risen dramatically. These solutions offer numerous benefits, such as scalability, flexibility, and reduced infrastructure costs, which are particularly attractive to businesses looking to optimize their IT expenditures. Additionally, the shift toward hybrid cloud environments, where enterprises leverage both on-premises and cloud resources, has spurred the demand for middleware that can effectively bridge these environments, ensuring seamless data flow and interoperability.

The rise of digital transformation initiatives across various industries is also fuelling the growth of the AIM market. Enterprises are continuously seeking ways to leverage digital technologies to enhance their operations and deliver superior value to customers. Middleware solutions play a pivotal role in these transformation efforts by providing the necessary tools for integrating new technologies with existing systems. For instance, as industries like healthcare and retail increasingly adopt Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, the need for middleware that can facilitate the integration of IoT data with enterprise systems has become paramount. This trend is expected to drive significant demand for AIM solutions in the coming years.

Regionally, North America stands out as a significant contributor to the AIM software market. The region's well-established IT infrastructure, coupled with the early adoption of advanced technologies, has paved the way for widespread adoption of middleware solutions. Furthermore, the presence of a large number of technology firms and a robust digital economy further bolster the market's growth in this region. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to witness the fastest growth, driven by rapid digitalization efforts in countries like China and India, increasing investment in IT infrastructure, and the burgeoning presence of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that are keen to modernize their IT operations.

The integration of SOA Application Middleware has become increasingly vital in the modern AIM software landscape. Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) middleware facilitates the seamless interaction between different software applications and services, allowing businesses to leverage existing systems while integrating new technologies. This middleware acts as a bridge, enabling diverse applications to communicate and share data efficiently, which is essential for organizations aiming to enhance agility and responsiveness in their IT environments. By adopting SOA Application Middleware, enterprises can achieve greater flexibility and scalability, which are crucial for adapting to evolving business needs and technological advancements.

Component Analysis

In the AIM software market, the component segment is bifurcated into software and services. The software component

Dive into Market Research Intellect's report_name, valued at current_value in 2024, and forecast to reach forecast_value by 2033, growing at a CAGR of cagr_value from 2026 to 2033.

The global Application Infrastructure and Middleware (AIM) Software market size was valued at USD 23,130 million in 2025 and is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6% from 2025 to 2033. Key drivers of this growth include the increasing adoption of cloud computing, the growing need for data integration and management, and the rising demand for mobile applications. Additionally, the increasing focus on digital transformation and the need to improve operational efficiency are further contributing to the growth of the AIM software market. The AIM software market is segmented based on application, type, and region. By application, the market is divided into BFSI, IT, media and entertainment, retail and consumer. By type, the market is divided into managed and professional. Geographically, the market is segmented into North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East & Africa, and Asia Pacific. North America is the largest regional market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period due to the increasing adoption of cloud computing and mobile applications in emerging economies such as China and India. Market Size: USD 60.0 Billion in 2021, growing to USD 90.0 Billion by 2028; CAGR of 6.0% during the forecast period.

Application Infrastructure And Middleware AIM Software Market size was valued at USD 25.6 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 47.6 Billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 8.5% during the forecast period 2024-2030.

Global Application Infrastructure and Middleware AIM Software Market Drivers

The market drivers for the Application Infrastructure and Middleware AIM Software Market can be influenced by various factors. These may include: • Digital Transformation Initiatives: To improve customer satisfaction, operational effectiveness, and overall business agility, organizations all over the world are experiencing digital transformation. Since AIM software offers a scalable and adaptable application infrastructure, it is essential to the success of these efforts. • Cloud Computing usage: The need for AIM software is being driven by the broad usage of cloud computing. Solutions for middleware that can manage and integrate apps across hybrid and multi-cloud systems are needed as more enterprises move their apps to the cloud. • Growing Need for Integration Solutions: As IT environments get more complex, there is a greater need for integration solutions to link various systems and apps. By enabling smooth connectivity, AIM software helps businesses optimize data flow and streamline operations. • Development of Mobile Applications: The need for AIM software is being driven by the development of mobile applications in a variety of industries. Businesses are adopting a mobile-centric approach, which is supported by middleware solutions that facilitate the creation and integration of mobile applications. • Internet of Things (IoT) Growth: To handle connectivity, data processing, and integration, the proliferation of IoT devices and applications requires strong middleware. To build a networked ecosystem that can effectively manage the massive volume of data produced by Internet of Things devices, AIM software is essential. • Emphasis on client Experience: Companies are now more focused on providing a smooth and improved client experience. AIM software facilitates the development of effective and responsive apps, guaranteeing that users may seamlessly engage with digital platforms. • Open Source Middleware Solutions: The expansion of the AIM software market is facilitated by the accessibility and uptake of open-source middleware solutions. Open-source solutions offer more affordable options and stimulate middleware development creativity. • Security and Compliance Issues: Making sure that apps are secure and compliant is becoming more important as cybersecurity threats keep changing. Strong security features in AIM software are required to protect important business data and procedures. • Business Process Optimization: By offering capabilities for workflow management, business rule automation, and process orchestration, AIM software helps businesses optimize their business processes. The optimization drive improves the agility and efficiency of operations. • Globalization & Market Expansion: Companies that want to grow internationally need to have application infrastructure that is flexible and scalable. Organizations can support worldwide business operations by deploying apps across many geographic areas with the help of AIM software.

Abstract

The study included four separate surveys:

1. The LSMS survey of general population of Serbia in 2002

2. The survey of Family Income Support (MOP in Serbian) recipients in 2002 These two datasets are published together.

3. The LSMS survey of general population of Serbia in 2003 (panel survey)

4. The survey of Roma from Roma settlements in 2003 These two datasets are published together separately from the 2002 datasets.

Objectives

LSMS represents multi-topical study of household living standard and is based on international experience in designing and conducting this type of research. The basic survey was carried out in 2002 on a representative sample of households in Serbia (without Kosovo and Metohija). Its goal was to establish a poverty profile according to the comprehensive data on welfare of households and to identify vulnerable groups. Also its aim was to assess the targeting of safety net programs by collecting detailed information from individuals on participation in specific government social programs. This study was used as the basic document in developing Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) in Serbia which was adopted by the Government of the Republic of Serbia in October 2003.

The survey was repeated in 2003 on a panel sample (the households which participated in 2002 survey were re-interviewed).

Analysis of the take-up and profile of the population in 2003 was the first step towards formulating the system of monitoring in the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS). The survey was conducted in accordance with the same methodological principles used in 2002 survey, with necessary changes referring only to the content of certain modules and the reduction in sample size. The aim of the repeated survey was to obtain panel data to enable monitoring of the change in the living standard within a period of one year, thus indicating whether there had been a decrease or increase in poverty in Serbia in the course of 2003. [Note: Panel data are the data obtained on the sample of households which participated in the both surveys. These data made possible tracking of living standard of the same persons in the period of one year.]

Along with these two comprehensive surveys, conducted on national and regional representative samples which were to give a picture of the general population, there were also two surveys with particular emphasis on vulnerable groups. In 2002, it was the survey of living standard of Family Income Support recipients with an aim to validate this state supported program of social welfare. In 2003 the survey of Roma from Roma settlements was conducted. Since all present experiences indicated that this was one of the most vulnerable groups on the territory of Serbia and Montenegro, but with no ample research of poverty of Roma population made, the aim of the survey was to compare poverty of this group with poverty of basic population and to establish which categories of Roma population were at the greatest risk of poverty in 2003. However, it is necessary to stress that the LSMS of the Roma population comprised potentially most imperilled Roma, while the Roma integrated in the main population were not included in this study.

Geographic coverage

The surveys were conducted on the whole territory of Serbia (without Kosovo and Metohija).

Analysis unit

• Households
• Individuals

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Sample frame for both surveys of general population (LSMS) in 2002 and 2003 consisted of all permanent residents of Serbia, without the population of Kosovo and Metohija, according to definition of permanently resident population contained in UN Recommendations for Population Censuses, which were applied in 2002 Census of Population in the Republic of Serbia. Therefore, permanent residents were all persons living in the territory Serbia longer than one year, with the exception of diplomatic and consular staff.

The sample frame for the survey of Family Income Support recipients included all current recipients of this program on the territory of Serbia based on the official list of recipients given by Ministry of Social affairs.

The definition of the Roma population from Roma settlements was faced with obstacles since precise data on the total number of Roma population in Serbia are not available. According to the last population Census from 2002 there were 108,000 Roma citizens, but the data from the Census are thought to significantly underestimate the total number of the Roma population. However, since no other more precise data were available, this number was taken as the basis for estimate on Roma population from Roma settlements. According to the 2002 Census, settlements with at least 7% of the total population who declared itself as belonging to Roma nationality were selected. A total of 83% or 90,000 self-declared Roma lived in the settlements that were defined in this way and this number was taken as the sample frame for Roma from Roma settlements.

Planned sample: In 2002 the planned size of the sample of general population included 6.500 households. The sample was both nationally and regionally representative (representative on each individual stratum). In 2003 the planned panel sample size was 3.000 households. In order to preserve the representative quality of the sample, we kept every other census block unit of the large sample realized in 2002. This way we kept the identical allocation by strata. In selected census block unit, the same households were interviewed as in the basic survey in 2002. The planned sample of Family Income Support recipients in 2002 and Roma from Roma settlements in 2003 was 500 households for each group.

Sample type: In both national surveys the implemented sample was a two-stage stratified sample. Units of the first stage were enumeration districts, and units of the second stage were the households. In the basic 2002 survey, enumeration districts were selected with probability proportional to number of households, so that the enumeration districts with bigger number of households have a higher probability of selection. In the repeated survey in 2003, first-stage units (census block units) were selected from the basic sample obtained in 2002 by including only even numbered census block units. In practice this meant that every second census block unit from the previous survey was included in the sample. In each selected enumeration district the same households interviewed in the previous round were included and interviewed. On finishing the survey in 2003 the cases were merged both on the level of households and members.

Stratification: Municipalities are stratified into the following six territorial strata: Vojvodina, Belgrade, Western Serbia, Central Serbia (Šumadija and Pomoravlje), Eastern Serbia and South-east Serbia. Primary units of selection are further stratified into enumeration districts which belong to urban type of settlements and enumeration districts which belong to rural type of settlement.

The sample of Family Income Support recipients represented the cases chosen randomly from the official list of recipients provided by Ministry of Social Affairs. The sample of Roma from Roma settlements was,as in the national survey, a two-staged stratified sample, but the units in the first stage were settlements where Roma population was represented in the percentage over 7%, and the units of the second stage were Roma households. Settlements are stratified in three territorial strata: Vojvodina, Beograd and Central Serbia.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

In all surveys the same questionnaire with minimal changes was used. It included different modules, topically separate areas which had an aim of perceiving the living standard of households from different angles. Topic areas were the following: 1. Roster with demography. 2. Housing conditions and durables module with information on the age of durables owned by a household with a special block focused on collecting information on energy billing, payments, and usage. 3. Diary of food expenditures (weekly), including home production, gifts and transfers in kind. 4. Questionnaire of main expenditure-based recall periods sufficient to enable construction of annual consumption at the household level, including home production, gifts and transfers in kind. 5. Agricultural production for all households which cultivate 10+ acres of land or who breed cattle. 6. Participation and social transfers module with detailed breakdown by programs 7. Labour Market module in line with a simplified version of the Labour Force Survey (LFS), with special additional questions to capture various informal sector activities, and providing information on earnings 8. Health with a focus on utilization of services and expenditures (including informal payments) 9. Education module, which incorporated pre-school, compulsory primary education, secondary education and university education. 10. Special income block, focusing on sources of income not covered in other parts (with a focus on remittances).

Response rate

During field work, interviewers kept a precise diary of interviews, recording both successful and unsuccessful visits. Particular attention was paid to reasons why some households were not interviewed. Separate marks were given for households which were not interviewed due to refusal and for cases when a given household could not be found on the territory of the chosen census block.

In 2002 a total of 7,491 households were contacted. Of this number a total of 6,386 households in 621 census rounds were interviewed. Interviewers did not manage to collect the data for

Discover the latest insights from Market Research Intellect's Application Infrastructure And Middleware AIM Software Market Report, valued at USD 20 billion in 2024, with significant growth projected to USD 35 billion by 2033 at a CAGR of 7.5% (2026-2033).

The AIM (Application Integration Middleware) software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for seamless data integration across diverse enterprise applications and cloud environments. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated $40 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors: the burgeoning adoption of cloud-based applications and microservices architectures, which necessitates sophisticated integration solutions; the rise of big data and the Internet of Things (IoT), generating massive volumes of data requiring efficient integration; and the growing demand for real-time data processing and analytics to support faster decision-making. Key players like IBM, Oracle, Salesforce, and SAP are heavily invested in this space, constantly innovating to meet evolving business needs. However, the market also faces challenges such as the complexity of integrating legacy systems, the need for skilled professionals to manage these integrations, and the security concerns surrounding data exchange across multiple platforms. Segment-wise, the cloud-based AIM software segment is expected to dominate, owing to its scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. Geographically, North America and Europe currently hold significant market shares, but the Asia-Pacific region is anticipated to experience the fastest growth due to increasing digital transformation initiatives and a growing adoption of enterprise applications. The competitive landscape is characterized by both established players and emerging vendors, leading to continuous innovation and competitive pricing. The future of the AIM software market hinges on continued technological advancements, particularly in areas like AI-powered integration and serverless architectures, further enhancing the efficiency and agility of enterprise applications and workflows. The sustained growth trajectory reflects the indispensable role AIM software plays in modern business operations, enabling organizations to leverage their data effectively to achieve strategic objectives.

The statistic depicts the revenue from application infrastructure and middleware (AIM) software between 2009 and 2020. In 2017, the application infrastructure and middleware software market generated 28.44 billion U.S. dollars in revenue.

This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 2011 to 2023 for Aim College & Career Prep vs. Texas and Galveston Independent School District

Supplementary Material 3.

This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 1998 to 2018 for Aim vs. Michigan and Breckenridge Community Schools School District

This dataset tracks annual reduced-price lunch eligibility from 2001 to 2016 for Aim vs. Michigan and Breckenridge Community Schools School District

Abstract Managers in the construction sector are being urged to reduce the housing deficit in the low-income segment. The use of industrialised building systems is an alternative for achieving this aim and for the implementation of mass customization. However, the possibility of conferring some degree of customisation in housing may have negative impacts on production. Product modularity is a mass customisation approach, by designing modules that can be combined to provide product variety. The aim of this paper is to propose design guidelines to reduce waste in the production of prefabricated wall panels in dry construction systems, focusing on simplifying the production of customised social housing. The methodological approach adopted was design science research. The research started with a literature review to understand the concepts of Product Architecture and Modularity. Based on the results, we proposed design guidelines applying the principles of product modularity. The effect of the guidelines on the production process of the panels was evaluated through data collection at the factory. The adoption of product modularity in house-building design proved to be an efficient approach for the standardisation of components and for simplifying the mass production process of the wall panels.

This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 2013 to 2023 for New Visions Aim Charter High School I vs. New York and New Visions Aim Charter High School I School District

This dataset tracks annual reduced-price lunch eligibility from 2013 to 2023 for Aim High School vs. Washington and Snohomish School District

Model 1 is adjusted for age. Model 2 is adjusted for age, hypertension, and diabetes. Model 3 is adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes, and behavioral factors including smoking, heavy drinking, regular exercise, and BMI. Model 4 is adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes, behavioral factors, and income level.CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.Risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke associated with voluntary retirement and involuntary job loss in males.

This dataset tracks annual free lunch eligibility from 1996 to 2020 for Aim Center High School vs. Texas and Vidor Independent School District

This dataset tracks annual reduced-price lunch eligibility from 2013 to 2023 for New Visions Aim Charter High School I vs. New York and New Visions Aim Charter High School I School District