100+ datasets found
  1. w

    The National Institute on Aging Genetics of Alzheimer’s Disease Data Storage...

    • data.wu.ac.at
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 17, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2016). The National Institute on Aging Genetics of Alzheimer’s Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS) [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/data_gov/MmUxNmJiOTMtYWYxMi00MzgyLThjMGEtZGVlY2YxZTQ1MTRi
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 17, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
    Description

    The National Institute on Aging Genetics of Alzheimer's Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS) is a national genetics data repository facilitating access to genotypic and phenotypic data for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Data include GWAS, whole genome (WGS) and whole exome (WES), expression, RNA Seq, and CHIP Seq analyses. Data for the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) are available through a partnership with dbGaP (ADSP at dbGaP). Results are integrated and annotated in the searchable genomics database that also provides access to a variety of software packages, analytic pipelines, online resources, and web-based tools to facilitate analysis and interpretation of large-scale genomic data. Data are available as defined by the NIA Genomics of Alzheimer’s Disease Sharing Policy and the NIH Genomics Data Sharing Policy. Investigators return secondary analysis data to the database in keeping with the NIAGADS Data Distribution Agreement.

  2. Access to Mental Health

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • share-open-data-njtpa.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 3, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Urban Observatory by Esri (2018). Access to Mental Health [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/07f70065653b4386b5c87cbe9b50b314
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Urban Observatory by Esri
    Area covered
    Description

    This map shows the access to mental health providers in every county and state in the United States according to the 2024 County Health Rankings & Roadmaps data for counties, states, and the nation. It translates the numbers to explain how many additional mental health providers are needed in each county and state. According to the data, in the United States overall there are 319 people per mental health provider in the U.S. The maps clearly illustrate that access to mental health providers varies widely across the country.The data comes from this County Health Rankings 2024 layer. An updated layer is usually published each year, which allows comparisons from year to year. This map contains layers for 2024 and also for 2022 as a comparison.County Health Rankings & Roadmaps (CHR&R), a program of the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute with support provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, draws attention to why there are differences in health within and across communities by measuring the health of nearly all counties in the nation. This map's layers contain 2024 CHR&R data for nation, state, and county levels. The CHR&R Annual Data Release is compiled using county-level measures from a variety of national and state data sources. CHR&R provides a snapshot of the health of nearly every county in the nation. A wide range of factors influence how long and how well we live, including: opportunities for education, income, safe housing and the right to shape policies and practices that impact our lives and futures. Health Outcomes tell us how long people live on average within a community, and how people experience physical and mental health in a community. Health Factors represent the things we can improve to support longer and healthier lives. They are indicators of the future health of our communities.Some example measures are:Life ExpectancyAccess to Exercise OpportunitiesUninsuredFlu VaccinationsChildren in PovertySchool Funding AdequacySevere Housing Cost BurdenBroadband AccessTo see a full list of variables, definitions and descriptions, explore the Fields information by clicking the Data tab here in the Item Details of this layer. For full documentation, visit the Measures page on the CHR&R website. Notable changes in the 2024 CHR&R Annual Data Release:Measures of birth and death now provide more detailed race categories including a separate category for ‘Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander’ and a ‘Two or more races’ category where possible. Find more information on the CHR&R website.Ranks are no longer calculated nor included in the dataset. CHR&R introduced a new graphic to the County Health Snapshots on their website that shows how a county fares relative to other counties in a state and nation. Data Processing:County Health Rankings data and metadata were prepared and formatted for Living Atlas use by the CHR&R team. 2021 U.S. boundaries are used in this dataset for a total of 3,143 counties. Analytic data files can be downloaded from the CHR&R website.

  3. d

    Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) 4.0

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Jul 20, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) 4.0 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/protected-areas-database-of-the-united-states-pad-us-4-0
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public land and voluntarily provided private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastre Theme ( https://ngda-cadastre-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com/ ). The PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database including areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural (including extraction), recreational, or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The database was originally designed to support biodiversity assessments; however, its scope expanded in recent years to include all open space public and nonprofit lands and waters. Most are public lands owned in fee (the owner of the property has full and irrevocable ownership of the land); however, permanent and long-term easements, leases, agreements, Congressional (e.g. 'Wilderness Area'), Executive (e.g. 'National Monument'), and administrative designations (e.g., 'Area of Critical Environmental Concern') documented in agency management plans are also included. The PAD-US strives to be a complete inventory of U.S. public land and other protected areas, compiling “best available” data provided by managing agencies and organizations. PAD-US provides a full inventory geodatabase, spatial analysis, statistics, data downloads, web services, poster maps, and data submissions included in efforts to track global progress toward biodiversity protection. PAD-US integrates spatial data to ensure public lands and other protected areas from all jurisdictions are represented. PAD-US version 4.0 includes new and updated data from the following data providers. All other data were transferred from previous versions of PAD-US. Federal updates - The USGS remains committed to updating federal fee owned lands data and major designation changes in regular PAD-US updates, where authoritative data provided directly by managing agencies are available or alternative data sources are recommended. Revisions associated with the federal estate in this version include updates to the Federal estate (fee ownership parcels, easement interest, management designations, and proclamation boundaries), with authoritative data from 7 agencies: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Census Bureau (Census Bureau), Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service (NPS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS). The federal theme in PAD-US is developed in close collaboration with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Federal Lands Working Group (FLWG, https://ngda-gov-units-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com/pages/federal-lands-workgroup/ ). This includes improved the representation of boundaries and attributes for the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands, in collaboration with agency data-stewards, in response to feedback from the PAD-US Team and stakeholders. Additionally, National Cemetery boundaries were added using geospatial boundary data provided by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and NASA boundaries were added using data contained in the USGS National Boundary Dataset (NBD). State Updates - USGS is committed to building capacity in the state data steward network and the PAD-US Team to increase the frequency of state land and NGO partner updates, as resources allow. State Lands Workgroup ( https://ngda-gov-units-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com/pages/state-lands-workgroup ) is focused on improving protected land inventories in PAD-US, increase update efficiency, and facilitate local review. PAD-US 4.0 included updates and additions from the following seventeen states and territories: California (state, local, and nonprofit fee); Colorado (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); Georgia (state and local fee); Kentucky (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); Maine (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); Montana (state, local, and nonprofit fee); Nebraska (state fee); New Jersey (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); New York (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); North Carolina (state, local, and nonprofit fee); Pennsylvania (state, local, and nonprofit fee and easement); Puerto Rico (territory fee); Tennessee (land trust fee); Texas (state, local, and nonprofit fee); Virginia (state, local, and nonprofit fee); West Virginia (state, local, and nonprofit fee); and Wisconsin (state fee data). Additionally, the following datasets were incorporated from NGO data partners: Trust for Public Land (TPL) Parkserve (new fee and easement data); The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Lands (fee owned by TNC); TNC Northeast Secured Areas; Ducks Unlimited (land trust fee); and the National Conservation Easement Database (NCED). All state and NGO easement submissions are provided to NCED. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/protected-areas . For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/protected-areas . For more information about data aggregation please review the PAD-US Data Manual available at https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/pad-us-data-manual . A version history of PAD-US updates is summarized below (See https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/pad-us-data-history/ for more information): 1) First posted - April 2009 (Version 1.0 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 2) Revised - May 2010 (Version 1.1 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 3) Revised - April 2011 (Version 1.2 - available from the PAD-US: Team pad-us@usgs.gov). 4) Revised - November 2012 (Version 1.3) https://doi.org/10.5066/F79Z92XD 5) Revised - May 2016 (Version 1.4) https://doi.org/10.5066/F7G73BSZ 6) Revised - September 2018 (Version 2.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P955KPLE 7) Revised - September 2020 (Version 2.1) https://doi.org/10.5066/P92QM3NT 8) Revised - January 2022 (Version 3.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Q9LQ4B 9) Revised - April 2024 (Version 4.0) https://doi.org/10.5066/P96WBCHS Comparing protected area trends between PAD-US versions is not recommended without consultation with USGS as many changes reflect improvements to agency and organization GIS systems, or conservation and recreation measure classification, rather than actual changes in protected area acquisition on the ground.

  4. f

    DataSheet_1_Rolling Deck to Repository: Supporting the marine science...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Suzanne M. Carbotte; Suzanne O’Hara; Karen Stocks; P. Dru Clark; Laura Stolp; Shawn R. Smith; Kristen Briggs; Rebecca Hudak; Emily Miller; Chris J. Olson; Neville Shane; Rafael Uribe; Robert Arko; Cynthia L. Chandler; Vicki Ferrini; Stephen P. Miller; Alice Doyle; James Holik (2023). DataSheet_1_Rolling Deck to Repository: Supporting the marine science community with data management services from academic research expeditions.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1012756.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Suzanne M. Carbotte; Suzanne O’Hara; Karen Stocks; P. Dru Clark; Laura Stolp; Shawn R. Smith; Kristen Briggs; Rebecca Hudak; Emily Miller; Chris J. Olson; Neville Shane; Rafael Uribe; Robert Arko; Cynthia L. Chandler; Vicki Ferrini; Stephen P. Miller; Alice Doyle; James Holik
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Direct observations of the oceans acquired on oceanographic research ships operated across the international community support fundamental research into the many disciplines of ocean science and provide essential information for monitoring the health of the oceans. A comprehensive knowledge base is needed to support the responsible stewardship of the oceans with easy access to all data acquired globally. In the United States, the multidisciplinary shipboard sensor data routinely acquired each year on the fleet of coastal, regional and global ranging vessels supporting academic marine research are managed by the Rolling Deck to Repository (R2R, rvdata.us) program. With over a decade of operations, the R2R program has developed a robust routinized system to transform diverse data contributions from different marine data providers into a standardized and comprehensive collection of global-ranging observations of marine atmosphere, ocean, seafloor and subseafloor properties that is openly available to the international research community. In this article we describe the elements and framework of the R2R program and the services provided. To manage all expeditions conducted annually, a fleet-wide approach has been developed using data distributions submitted from marine operators with a data management workflow designed to maximize automation of data curation. Other design goals are to improve the completeness and consistency of the data and metadata archived, to support data citability, provenance tracking and interoperable data access aligned with FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) recommendations, and to facilitate delivery of data from the fleet for global data syntheses. Findings from a collection-level review of changes in data acquisition practices and quality over the past decade are presented. Lessons learned from R2R operations are also discussed including the benefits of designing data curation around the routine practices of data providers, approaches for ensuring preservation of a more complete data collection with a high level of FAIRness, and the opportunities for homogenization of datasets from the fleet so that they can support the broadest re-use of data across a diverse user community.

  5. Data from: Associations between access to healthcare, environmental quality,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 12, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) (2020). Associations between access to healthcare, environmental quality, and end-stage renal disease survival time: proportional-hazards models of over 1,000,000 people over 14 years [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/associations-between-access-to-healthcare-environmental-quality-and-end-stage-renal-diseas
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 12, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    United States Environmental Protection Agencyhttp://www.epa.gov/
    Description

    The USRDS is the largest and most comprehensive national ESRD surveillance system in the US (Collins et al., 2015). The USRDS contains data on all ESRD cases in the US through the Medical Evidence Report CMS-2728 which is mandated for all new patients diagnosed with ESRD (Foley and Collins, 2013). Detailed information about the USRDS can be found on their website (http://www.usrds.org). The EQI was constructed for 2000-2005 for all US counties and is composed of five domains (air, water, built, land, and sociodemographic), each composed of variables to represent the environmental quality of that domain. Domain-specific EQIs were developed using principal components analysis (PCA) to reduce these variables within each domain while the overall EQI was constructed from a second PCA from these individual domains (L. C. Messer et al., 2014). To account for differences in environment across rural and urban counties, the overall and domain-specific EQIs were stratified by rural urban continuum codes (RUCCs) (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2015). This dataset is not publicly accessible because: EPA cannot release personally identifiable information regarding living individuals, according to the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This dataset contains information about human research subjects. Because there is potential to identify individual participants and disclose personal information, either alone or in combination with other datasets, individual level data are not appropriate to post for public access. Restricted access may be granted to authorized persons by contacting the party listed. It can be accessed through the following means: Human health data are not available publicly. EQI data are available at: https://edg.epa.gov/data/Public/ORD/NHEERL/EQI. Format: Data stored as csv files. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Kosnik, M., D. Reif, D. Lobdell, T. Astell-Burt, X. Feng, J. Hader, and J. Hoppin. Associations between access to healthcare, environmental quality, and end-stage renal disease survival time: Proportional-hazards models of over 1,000,000 people over 14 years. PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science, San Francisco, CA, USA, 14(3): e0214094, (2019).

  6. COVID-19 Case Surveillance Public Use Data

    • data.virginia.gov
    • opendatalab.com
    • +5more
    csv, json, rdf, xsl
    Updated Feb 23, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025). COVID-19 Case Surveillance Public Use Data [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/covid-19-case-surveillance-public-use-data
    Explore at:
    rdf, csv, json, xslAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 23, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Description

    Note: Reporting of new COVID-19 Case Surveillance data will be discontinued July 1, 2024, to align with the process of removing SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-19 cases) from the list of nationally notifiable diseases. Although these data will continue to be publicly available, the dataset will no longer be updated.

    Authorizations to collect certain public health data expired at the end of the U.S. public health emergency declaration on May 11, 2023. The following jurisdictions discontinued COVID-19 case notifications to CDC: Iowa (11/8/21), Kansas (5/12/23), Kentucky (1/1/24), Louisiana (10/31/23), New Hampshire (5/23/23), and Oklahoma (5/2/23). Please note that these jurisdictions will not routinely send new case data after the dates indicated. As of 7/13/23, case notifications from Oregon will only include pediatric cases resulting in death.

    This case surveillance public use dataset has 12 elements for all COVID-19 cases shared with CDC and includes demographics, any exposure history, disease severity indicators and outcomes, presence of any underlying medical conditions and risk behaviors, and no geographic data.

    CDC has three COVID-19 case surveillance datasets:

    The following apply to all three datasets:

    Overview

    The COVID-19 case surveillance database includes individual-level data reported to U.S. states and aut

  7. O*NET Database

    • onetcenter.org
    excel, mysql, oracle +2
    Updated May 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Center for O*NET Development (2025). O*NET Database [Dataset]. https://www.onetcenter.org/database.html
    Explore at:
    oracle, sql server, text, mysql, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Occupational Information Network
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Dataset funded by
    US Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration
    Description

    The O*NET Database contains hundreds of standardized and occupation-specific descriptors on almost 1,000 occupations covering the entire U.S. economy. The database, which is available to the public at no cost, is continually updated by a multi-method data collection program. Sources of data include: job incumbents, occupational experts, occupational analysts, employer job postings, and customer/professional association input.

    Data content areas include:

    • Worker Characteristics (e.g., Abilities, Interests, Work Styles)
    • Worker Requirements (e.g., Education, Knowledge, Skills)
    • Experience Requirements (e.g., On-the-Job Training, Work Experience)
    • Occupational Requirements (e.g., Detailed Work Activities, Work Context)
    • Occupation-Specific Information (e.g., Job Titles, Tasks, Technology Skills)

  8. d

    Dataplex: All CMS Data Feeds | Access 1519 Reports & 26B+ Rows of Contact...

    • datarade.ai
    .csv
    Updated Aug 29, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataplex (2024). Dataplex: All CMS Data Feeds | Access 1519 Reports & 26B+ Rows of Contact Data | Perfect for Historical Analysis & Easy Ingestion [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/dataplex-all-cms-data-feeds-access-1519-reports-26b-row-dataplex-3b76
    Explore at:
    .csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 29, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataplex
    Area covered
    United States of America
    Description

    The All CMS Data Feeds dataset is an expansive resource offering access to 119 unique report feeds, providing in-depth insights into various aspects of the U.S. healthcare system including nursing facility owners and accountable care organization participants contact data. With over 25.8 billion rows of data meticulously collected since 2007, this dataset is invaluable for healthcare professionals, analysts, researchers, and businesses seeking to understand and analyze healthcare trends, performance metrics, and demographic shifts over time. The dataset is updated monthly, ensuring that users always have access to the most current and relevant data available.

    Dataset Overview:

    118 Report Feeds: - The dataset includes a wide array of report feeds, each providing unique insights into different dimensions of healthcare. These topics range from Medicare and Medicaid service metrics, patient demographics, provider information, financial data, and much more. The breadth of information ensures that users can find relevant data for nearly any healthcare-related analysis. - As CMS releases new report feeds, they are automatically added to this dataset, keeping it current and expanding its utility for users.

    25.8 Billion Rows of Data:

    • With over 25.8 billion rows of data, this dataset provides a comprehensive view of the U.S. healthcare system. This extensive volume of data allows for granular analysis, enabling users to uncover insights that might be missed in smaller datasets. The data is also meticulously cleaned and aligned, ensuring accuracy and ease of use.

    Historical Data Since 2007: - The dataset spans from 2007 to the present, offering a rich historical perspective that is essential for tracking long-term trends and changes in healthcare delivery, policy impacts, and patient outcomes. This historical data is particularly valuable for conducting longitudinal studies and evaluating the effects of various healthcare interventions over time.

    Monthly Updates:

    • To ensure that users have access to the most current information, the dataset is updated monthly. These updates include new reports as well as revisions to existing data, making the dataset a continuously evolving resource that stays relevant and accurate.

    Data Sourced from CMS:

    • The data in this dataset is sourced directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). After collection, the data is meticulously cleaned and its attributes are aligned, ensuring consistency, accuracy, and ease of use for any application. Furthermore, any new updates or releases from CMS are automatically integrated into the dataset, keeping it comprehensive and current.

    Use Cases:

    Market Analysis:

    • The dataset is ideal for market analysts who need to understand the dynamics of the healthcare industry. The extensive historical data allows for detailed segmentation and analysis, helping users identify trends, market shifts, and growth opportunities. The comprehensive nature of the data enables users to perform in-depth analyses of specific market segments, making it a valuable tool for strategic decision-making.

    Healthcare Research:

    • Researchers will find the All CMS Data Feeds dataset to be a robust foundation for academic and commercial research. The historical data, combined with the breadth of coverage across various healthcare metrics, supports rigorous, in-depth analysis. Researchers can explore the effects of healthcare policies, study patient outcomes, analyze provider performance, and more, all within a single, comprehensive dataset.

    Performance Tracking:

    • Healthcare providers and organizations can use the dataset to track performance metrics over time. By comparing data across different periods, organizations can identify areas for improvement, monitor the effectiveness of initiatives, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. The dataset provides the detailed, reliable data needed to track and analyze key performance indicators.

    Compliance and Regulatory Reporting:

    • The dataset is also an essential tool for compliance officers and those involved in regulatory reporting. With detailed data on provider performance, patient outcomes, and healthcare utilization, the dataset helps organizations meet regulatory requirements, prepare for audits, and ensure adherence to best practices. The accuracy and comprehensiveness of the data make it a trusted resource for regulatory compliance.

    Data Quality and Reliability:

    The All CMS Data Feeds dataset is designed with a strong emphasis on data quality and reliability. Each row of data is meticulously cleaned and aligned, ensuring that it is both accurate and consistent. This attention to detail makes the dataset a trusted resource for high-stakes applications, where data quality is critical.

    Integration and Usability:

    Ease of Integration:

    • The dataset is provided in a CSV format, which is widely compatible with most data analysis too...
  9. o

    US Colleges and Universities

    • public.opendatasoft.com
    • data.smartidf.services
    • +2more
    csv, excel, geojson +1
    Updated Jul 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). US Colleges and Universities [Dataset]. https://public.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/us-colleges-and-universities/
    Explore at:
    json, excel, geojson, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2025
    License

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domainhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The Colleges and Universities feature class/shapefile is composed of all Post Secondary Education facilities as defined by the Integrated Post Secondary Education System (IPEDS, http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, https://nces.ed.gov/), US Department of Education for the 2018-2019 school year. Included are Doctoral/Research Universities, Masters Colleges and Universities, Baccalaureate Colleges, Associates Colleges, Theological seminaries, Medical Schools and other health care professions, Schools of engineering and technology, business and management, art, music, design, Law schools, Teachers colleges, Tribal colleges, and other specialized institutions. Overall, this data layer covers all 50 states, as well as Puerto Rico and other assorted U.S. territories. This feature class contains all MEDS/MEDS+ as approved by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Homeland Security Infrastructure Program (HSIP) Team. Complete field and attribute information is available in the ”Entities and Attributes” metadata section. Geographical coverage is depicted in the thumbnail above and detailed in the "Place Keyword" section of the metadata. This feature class does not have a relationship class but is related to Supplemental Colleges. Colleges and Universities that are not included in the NCES IPEDS data are added to the Supplemental Colleges feature class when found. This release includes the addition of 175 new records, the removal of 468 no longer reported by NCES, and modifications to the spatial location and/or attribution of 6682 records.

  10. Data from: COVID-19 Case Surveillance Public Use Data with Geography

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +4more
    Updated May 8, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021). COVID-19 Case Surveillance Public Use Data with Geography [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/covid-19-case-surveillance-public-use-data-with-geography-0605b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 8, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Description

    This case surveillance public use dataset has 19 elements for all COVID-19 cases shared with CDC and includes demographics, geography (county and state of residence), any exposure history, disease severity indicators and outcomes, and presence of any underlying medical conditions and risk behaviors. Currently, CDC provides the public with three versions of COVID-19 case surveillance line-listed data: this 19 data element dataset with geography, a 12 data element public use dataset, and a 32 data element restricted access dataset. The following apply to the public use datasets and the restricted access dataset: - Data elements can be found on the COVID-19 case report form located at www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/pui-form.pdf. - Data are considered provisional by CDC and are subject to change until the data are reconciled and verified with the state and territorial data providers. - Some data are suppressed to protect individual privacy. - Datasets will include all cases with the earliest date available in each record (date received by CDC or date related to illness/specimen collection) at least 14 days prior to the creation of the previously updated datasets. This 14-day lag allows case reporting to be stabilized and ensure that time-dependent outcome data are accurately captured. - Datasets are updated monthly. - Datasets are created using CDC’s Policy on Public Health Research and Nonresearch Data Management and Access and include protections designed to protect individual privacy. - For more information about data collection and reporting, please see wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/data-collection.html. - For more information about the COVID-19 case surveillance data, please see www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/faq-surveillance.html. Overview The COVID-19 case surveillance database includes patient-level data reported by U.S. states and autonomous reporting entities, including New York City and the District of Columbia (D.C.), as well as U.S. territories and affiliates. On April 5, 2020, COVID-19 was added to the Nationally Notifiable Condition List and classified as "immediately notifiable, urgent (within 24 hours)" by a Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) Interim Position Statement (Interim-20-ID-01). CSTE updated the position statement on August 5, 2020 to clarify the interpretation of antigen detection tests and serologic test results within the case classification (Interim-20-ID-02). The statement also recommended that all states and territories enact laws to make COVID-19 reportable in their jurisdiction, and that jurisdictions conducting surveillance should submit case notifications to CDC. COVID-19 case surveillance data collected by jurisdictions are shared voluntarily with CDC. For more information, visit: wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditions/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/case-definition/2020/08/05/. COVID-19 Case Reports COVID-19 case reports are routinely submitted to CDC by pu

  11. United States US: Total Researchers: Full-Time Equivalent

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2023). United States US: Total Researchers: Full-Time Equivalent [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/united-states/number-of-researchers-and-personnel-on-research-and-development-oecd-member-annual/us-total-researchers-fulltime-equivalent
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    CEIC Data
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2010 - Dec 1, 2021
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    United States US: Total Researchers: Full-Time Equivalent data was reported at 1,639,258.000 FTE in 2021. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,513,964.000 FTE for 2020. United States US: Total Researchers: Full-Time Equivalent data is updated yearly, averaging 998,340.036 FTE from Dec 1981 (Median) to 2021, with 41 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,639,258.000 FTE in 2021 and a record low of 531,938.478 FTE in 1981. United States US: Total Researchers: Full-Time Equivalent data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.OECD.MSTI: Number of Researchers and Personnel on Research and Development: OECD Member: Annual.

    For the United States, from 2021 onwards, changes to the US BERD survey questionnaire allowed for more exhaustive identification of acquisition costs for ‘identifiable intangible assets’ used for R&D. This has resulted in a substantial increase in reported R&D capital expenditure within BERD. In the business sector, the funds from the rest of the world previously included in the business-financed BERD, are available separately from 2008. From 2006 onwards, GOVERD includes state government intramural performance (most of which being financed by the federal government and state government own funds). From 2016 onwards, PNPERD data are based on a new R&D performer survey. In the higher education sector all fields of SSH are included from 2003 onwards.

    Following a survey of federally-funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) in 2005, it was concluded that FFRDC R&D belongs in the government sector - rather than the sector of the FFRDC administrator, as had been reported in the past. R&D expenditures by FFRDCs were reclassified from the other three R&D performing sectors to the Government sector; previously published data were revised accordingly. Between 2003 and 2004, the method used to classify data by industry has been revised. This particularly affects the ISIC category “wholesale trade” and consequently the BERD for total services.

    U.S. R&D data are generally comparable, but there are some areas of underestimation:

    1. i) Up to 2008, Government sector R&D performance covers only federal government activities. That by State and local government establishments is excluded;
    2. ii) Except for the Government and the Business Enterprise sectors, the R&D data exclude most capital expenditures. For the Business Enterprise sector, depreciation is reported in place of gross capital expenditures up to 2014. Higher education (and national total) data were revised back to 1998 due to an improved methodology that corrects for double-counting of R&D funds passed between institutions.

    Breakdown by type of R&D (basic research, applied research, etc.) was also revised back to 1998 in the business enterprise and higher education sectors due to improved estimation procedures.

    The methodology for estimating researchers was changed as of 1985. In the Government, Higher Education and PNP sectors the data since then refer to employed doctoral scientists and engineers who report their primary work activity as research, development or the management of R&D, plus, for the Higher Education sector, the number of full-time equivalent graduate students with research assistantships averaging an estimated 50 % of their time engaged in R&D activities. As of 1985 researchers in the Government sector exclude military personnel. As of 1987, Higher education R&D personnel also include those who report their primary work activity as design.

    Due to lack of official data for the different employment sectors, the total researchers figure is an OECD estimate up to 2019. Comprehensive reporting of R&D personnel statistics by the United States has resumed with records available since 2020, reflecting the addition of official figures for the number of researchers and total R&D personnel for the higher education sector and the Private non-profit sector; as well as the number of researchers for the government sector. The new data revise downwards previous OECD estimates as the OECD extrapolation methods drawing on historical US data, required to produce a consistent OECD aggregate, appear to have previously overestimated the growth in the number of researchers in the higher education sector.

    Pre-production development is excluded from Defence GBARD (in accordance with the Frascati Manual) as of 2000. 2009 GBARD data also includes the one time incremental R&D funding legislated in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Beginning with the 2000 GBARD data, budgets for capital expenditure – “R&D plant” in national terminology - are included. GBARD data for earlier years relate to budgets for current costs only.

  12. m

    Gender Diversity, Corporate Governance and Firm Specific Data of All Public...

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Oct 11, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nafisah Yami (2023). Gender Diversity, Corporate Governance and Firm Specific Data of All Public Listed US Firms [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/fdw347mttz.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 11, 2023
    Authors
    Nafisah Yami
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset covers all publically listed companies in the United States from 2000 to 2018, which are listed in the S&P index. The starting point of 2000 is due to the minimal data available in the BoardEX database before this time in relation to board directors' information. Compustat is the source of financial data. As previous research indicates, financial and utilities firms are excluded from the sample due to their distinct regulations, which expose their directors to liability risks that non-financial firms are not subject to (Adams and Mehran, 2012; Sila et al., 2016). The sample size of non-financial firms amounts to 17,220. Financial variable outliers are adjusted to the 98% level in accordance with Bharath and Shumway's (2008) study.

  13. Z

    Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Aug 18, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Maddalena Ghiotto (2023). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - RESULTS DATASET (with Mega Journals) [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_8250857
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 18, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Sebastiano Giacomini
    Seyedali Ghasempouri
    Maddalena Ghiotto
    License

    Attribution 1.0 (CC BY 1.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The dataset contains all the data produced running the research software for the study:"Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta".

    Disclaimer: these results are not considered to be representative, because we have fount that Mega Journals skewed significantly some of the data. The result datasets without Mega Journals are published here.

    Description of datasets:

    SSH_Publications_in_OC_Meta_and_Open_Access_status.csv: containing information about OpenCitations Meta coverage of ERIH PLUS Journals as well as their Open Access availability. In this dataset, every row holds data for a Journal of ERIH PLUS also covered by OpenCitations Meta database. It is structured with the following columns: "EP_id", the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; "Publications_in_venue", the numbers of Publications counted in each venue; "OC_omid", the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue; "issn", numbers of publications in each venue; "Open Access", a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".

    SSH_Publications_by_Discipline.csv: containing information about number of publications per discipline (in addition, number of journals per discipline are also included). The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled "Discipline", contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled "Journal_count" and "Publication_count", respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.

    SSH_Publications_and_Journals_by_Country: containing information about number of publications and journals per country. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled "Country", contains single countries of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled "Journal_count" and "Publication_count", respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.

    result_disciplines.json: the dictionary containing all disciplines as key and a list of related ERIH PLUS venue identifiers as value.

    result_countries.json: the dictionary containing all countries as key and a list of related ERIH PLUS venue identifiers as value.

    duplicate_omids.csv: a dataset containing the duplicated Journal entries in OpenCitations Meta, structured with two columns: "OC_omid", the internal OC Meta identifier; "issn", the issn values associated to that identifier

    eu_data.csv: contains the data specific for European countries' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "EP_id", the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; "Publications_in_venue", the numbers of Publications counted in each venue; "Original_Title", "Country_of_Publication","ERIH_PLUS_Disciplines", "disc_count", the number of disciplines per Journal.

    eu_disciplines_count.csv: containing information about number of publications per discipline and number of journals per discipline of european countries. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled "Discipline", contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled "Journal_count" and "Publication_count", respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.

    meta_coverage_eu.csv: contains the data specific for European countries' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "EP_id", the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; "Publications_in_venue", the numbers of Publications counted in each venue; "OC_omid", the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue; "issn", numbers of publications in each venue; "Open Access", a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".

    us_data.csv: contains the data specific for the United States' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "EP_id", the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; "Publications_in_venue", the numbers of Publications counted in each venue; "Original_Title", "Country_of_Publication","ERIH_PLUS_Disciplines", "disc_count", the number of disciplines per Journal.

    us_disciplines_count.csv: containing information about number of publications per discipline and number of journals per discipline of the United States. The dataset has three columns, the first, labeled "Discipline", contains single disciplines of the ERIH classificaton, the second and the third, labeled "Journal_count" and "Publication_count", respectively, the number of Journals and the number of Publications counted for each discipline.

    meta_coverage_us.csv: contains the data specific for the United States' SSH Journals covered in OCMeta. It is structured with the following columns: "EP_id", the internal ERIH PLUS identifier; "Publications_in_venue", the numbers of Publications counted in each venue; "OC_omid", the internal OpenCitations Meta identifier for the venue; "issn", numbers of publications in each venue; "Open Access", a value to represent if the journal is OA or not, either "True" or "Unknown".

    Abstract of the research:

    Purpose: this study aims to investigate the representation and distribution of Social Science and Humanities (SSH) journals within the OpenCitations Meta database, with a particular emphasis on their Open Access (OA) status, as well as their spread across different disciplines and countries. The underlying premise is that open infrastructures play a pivotal role in promoting transparency, reproducibility, and trust in scientific research. Study Design and Methodology: the study is grounded on the premise that open infrastructures are crucial for ensuring transparency, reproducibility, and fostering trust in scientific research. The research methodology involved the use of secondary data sources, namely the OpenCitations Meta database, the ERIH PLUS bibliographic index, and the DOAJ index. A custom research software was developed in Python to facilitate the processing and analysis of the data. Findings: the results reveal that 78.1% of SSH journals listed in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH-PLUS) are included in the OpenCitations Meta database. The discipline of Psychology has the highest number of publications. The United States and the United Kingdom are the leading contributors in terms of the number of publications. However, the study also uncovers that only 38% of the SSH journals in the OpenCitations Meta database are OA. Originality: this research adds to the existing body of knowledge by providing insights into the representation of SSH in open bibliographic databases and the role of open access in this domain. The study highlights the necessity for advocating OA practices within SSH and the significance of open data for bibliometric studies. It further encourages additional research into the impact of OA on various facets of citation patterns and the factors leading to disparity across disciplinary representation.

    Related resources:

    Ghasempouri S., Ghiotto M., & Giacomini S. (2023). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - RESEARCH ARTICLE. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8263908

    Ghasempouri, S., Ghiotto, M., Giacomini, S., (2023). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 4). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8174644

    Ghasempouri, S., Ghiotto, M., Giacomini, S. (2023e). Open Science for Social Sciences and Humanities: Open Access availability and distribution across disciplines and Countries in OpenCitations Meta - PROTOCOL. V.5. (https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8jo1rg2w/v5)

  14. o

    Harmonized Database of Western U.S. Water Rights (HarDWR)

    • osti.gov
    Updated Oct 31, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Caccese, Robert; Fisher-Vanden, Karen; Fowler, Lara; Grogan, Danielle; Lammers, Richard; Lisk, Matthew; Olmstead, Sheila; Peklak, Darrah; Zheng, Jiameng; Zuidema, Shan (2024). Harmonized Database of Western U.S. Water Rights (HarDWR) [Dataset]. https://www.osti.gov/dataexplorer/biblio/dataset/2475303
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 31, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
    MultiSector Dynamics - Living, Intuitive, Value-adding, Environment
    Authors
    Caccese, Robert; Fisher-Vanden, Karen; Fowler, Lara; Grogan, Danielle; Lammers, Richard; Lisk, Matthew; Olmstead, Sheila; Peklak, Darrah; Zheng, Jiameng; Zuidema, Shan
    Area covered
    Western United States, United States
    Description

    From Lisk et al. (2024): "In the arid and semi-arid western U.S., access to water is regulated through a legal system of water rights. Individuals, companies, organizations, municipalities, and tribal entities have documents that declare their water rights. State water regulatory agencies collate and maintain these records, which can be used in legal disputes over access to water. While these records are publicly available data in all western U.S. states, the data have not yet been readily available in digital form from all states. Furthermore, there are many differences in data format, terminology, and definitions between state water regulatory agencies. Here, we have collected water rights data from 11 western U.S. state agencies, harmonized terminology and use definitions, formatted them consistently, and tied them to a western U.S.-wide shapefile of water administrative boundaries. We demonstrate how these data enable consistent regional-scale western U.S. hydrologic and economic modeling."

  15. l

    Restaurant Database (2025) | List of USA Restaurants

    • leadsdeposit.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Restaurant Database (2025) | List of USA Restaurants [Dataset]. https://leadsdeposit.com/restaurant-database/
    Explore at:
    License

    https://leadsdeposit.com/restaurant-database/https://leadsdeposit.com/restaurant-database/

    Description

    Dataset of 700,000 restaurants in the United States complete with detailed contact and geolocation data. The database includes multiple data points such as restaurant name, address, phone number, website, email, opening hours, latitude, longitude, and cuisine.

  16. United States US: Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % of Private Expenditure...

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2023). United States US: Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % of Private Expenditure on Health [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/united-states/health-statistics/us-outofpocket-health-expenditure--of-private-expenditure-on-health
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    CEIC Data
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Variables measured
    undefined
    Description

    United States US: Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % of Private Expenditure on Health data was reported at 21.365 % in 2014. This records a decrease from the previous number of 21.927 % for 2013. United States US: Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % of Private Expenditure on Health data is updated yearly, averaging 23.966 % from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2014, with 20 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 26.623 % in 1998 and a record low of 21.365 % in 2014. United States US: Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % of Private Expenditure on Health data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. Out of pocket expenditure is any direct outlay by households, including gratuities and in-kind payments, to health practitioners and suppliers of pharmaceuticals, therapeutic appliances, and other goods and services whose primary intent is to contribute to the restoration or enhancement of the health status of individuals or population groups. It is a part of private health expenditure.; ; World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure database (see http://apps.who.int/nha/database for the most recent updates).; Weighted average;

  17. United States Supreme Court Judicial Database Terms Series

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bureau of Justice Statistics (2025). United States Supreme Court Judicial Database Terms Series [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/united-states-supreme-court-judicial-database-terms-series-aea2b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Bureau of Justice Statisticshttp://bjs.ojp.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Investigator(s): Harold J. Spaeth, James L. Gibson, Michigan State University This data collection encompasses all aspects of United States Supreme Court decision-making from the beginning of the Warren Court in 1953 up to the completion of the 1995 term of the Rehnquist Court on July 1, 1996, including any decisions made afterward but before the start of the 1996 term on October 7, 1996. In this collection, distinct aspects of the court's decisions are covered by six types of variables: (1) identification variables including case citation, docket number, unit of analysis, and number of records per unit of analysis, (2) background variables offering information on origin of case, source of case, reason for granting cert, parties to the case, direction of the lower court's decision, and manner in which the Court takes jurisdiction, (3) chronological variables covering date of term of court, chief justice, and natural court, (4) substantive variables including multiple legal provisions, authority for decision, issue, issue areas, and direction of decision, (5) outcome variables supplying information on form of decision, disposition of case, winning party, declaration of unconstitutionality, and multiple memorandum decisions, and (6) voting and opinion variables pertaining to the vote in the case and to the direction of the individual justices' votes.Years Produced: Annually

  18. d

    SPRC19: State Policy Responses to COVID-19 Database

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Sep 25, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Frederick J. Boehmke; Bruce Desmarais; Jeffrey Harden J.; Abbie Eastman; Samuel Harper; Hyein Ko; Tracee M. Saunders (2024). SPRC19: State Policy Responses to COVID-19 Database [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GJAUGE
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 25, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Frederick J. Boehmke; Bruce Desmarais; Jeffrey Harden J.; Abbie Eastman; Samuel Harper; Hyein Ko; Tracee M. Saunders
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2020 - Aug 31, 2020
    Description

    SPRC19 seeks to document as completely as possible all U.S. state policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes all policy actions originating from the executive (governor’s office as well as executive agencies), legislative, and judicial branches. An action represents any change in current COVID-19 policy set at the state level. Actions are identified by reading through source documents collected from state websites and other sources according to their effects on any of over two hundred different policy areas. Each action is coded on a variety of features. These include its policy topic area, the branch that made the action, the announcement date, the effective date, an expiration date (if given), and the relationship to prior actions in the same policy area. To access the data and documentation quickly, search the Table view for "SPRC19" or switch to the Tree view. SPRC19 contains over 30,000 policy actions covering about 200 different policy areas. The current version is completed through August 31, 2020. We are in the process of updating through December 2020 and then beyond. The current release extends the previous release by adding actions from May through August 2020. The SPRC19 database was assembled with the support of the National Science Foundation through the following grants (grants #1558509, #1637095, #1558661, #1558781, #1558561, #2028724, #2028675, and #2028674, #2148216) and the NIH (grant #1R21AI164391-01).

  19. d

    California Legal Data - Court Data, Litigation Data, and Attorney Data. Get...

    • datarade.ai
    Updated Nov 27, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    APISCRAPY (2024). California Legal Data - Court Data, Litigation Data, and Attorney Data. Get in touch with APISCRAPY for all legal-related data in the USA & California [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/california-legal-data-court-data-litigation-data-and-atto-apiscrapy
    Explore at:
    .bin, .json, .xml, .csv, .xls, .sql, .txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 27, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    APISCRAPY
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    APISCRAPY offers comprehensive California legal data, including court data, litigation records, attorney information, and legal datasets for other states such as Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, and more. Our AI-driven web scraping tool simplifies data extraction and integration, transforming complex legal data into ready-to-use APIs.

    With APISCRAPY, you gain access to precise state-based legal data for lawyers, law data, and USA legal data, enabling seamless workflows and actionable insights. Our solution guarantees 50% cost savings compared to traditional methods, with flexible pricing tailored to your needs.

    Key Benefits:

    Extract and classify court data and litigation records for multiple states. Verified and accurate datasets for attorneys and legal professionals. Pre-built automation and real-time data delivery. Seamless integration with databases and BI tools, no coding required. Access free data samples to evaluate the quality of our services.

    Whether you're focused on compliance, market research, or business intelligence, APISCRAPY provides reliable legal data solutions across the USA, ensuring accuracy, efficiency, and affordability. Contact us today for your California legal data and beyond!

  20. d

    Mapping Resources: Consumer List Database - Individual and Household...

    • datarade.ai
    .csv, .txt
    Updated Jun 27, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mapping Resources (2023). Mapping Resources: Consumer List Database - Individual and Household Consumer Identity Data for the USA [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/united-states-individual-and-household-consumer-list-database-mapping-resources
    Explore at:
    .csv, .txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Mapping Resources
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    United States Consumer List Database with full contact information, including; Addresses, Telephone Numbers, Email Address and Location as well as hundreds of available consumer behavior/buying activity/lifestyle/interest attributes. Attribute categories include; Income, Net Worth, Home Ownership, Vehicle Ownership, Loan and Mortgage, Credit Usage, Buying Activities, Donor History and Lifestyle Interests/Hobbies. Please contact us for a full list of available attributes, list counts, and pricing.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2016). The National Institute on Aging Genetics of Alzheimer’s Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS) [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/data_gov/MmUxNmJiOTMtYWYxMi00MzgyLThjMGEtZGVlY2YxZTQ1MTRi

The National Institute on Aging Genetics of Alzheimer’s Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS)

Explore at:
177 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jul 17, 2016
Dataset provided by
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Description

The National Institute on Aging Genetics of Alzheimer's Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS) is a national genetics data repository facilitating access to genotypic and phenotypic data for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Data include GWAS, whole genome (WGS) and whole exome (WES), expression, RNA Seq, and CHIP Seq analyses. Data for the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) are available through a partnership with dbGaP (ADSP at dbGaP). Results are integrated and annotated in the searchable genomics database that also provides access to a variety of software packages, analytic pipelines, online resources, and web-based tools to facilitate analysis and interpretation of large-scale genomic data. Data are available as defined by the NIA Genomics of Alzheimer’s Disease Sharing Policy and the NIH Genomics Data Sharing Policy. Investigators return secondary analysis data to the database in keeping with the NIAGADS Data Distribution Agreement.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu