14 datasets found
  1. N

    All of Us Research Hub

    • datacatalog.med.nyu.edu
    Updated May 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    All of Us Research Program (2025). All of Us Research Hub [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.med.nyu.edu/dataset/10421
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    All of Us Research Program
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2017 - Present
    Area covered
    Delaware, Wyoming, Maryland, Vermont, Kansas, Hawaii, Washington, D.C., Illinois, West Virginia, Louisiana
    Description

    With an emphasis on reaching historically underrepresented populations, the All of Us Research Program recruits adults aged 18 and above across the United States to share their health data to enable new insights into human health and research on precision medicine. Participants contribute electronic health records (EHR), survey responses, biospecimens, wearable devices (biometrics), and physical measurements.

    The six All of Us surveys assess the areas listed below:

    • Basic demographic information
    • Lifestyle/substance use (i.e., tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs)
    • Overall health (general health status, daily activities, and women’s health)
    • Medical history (medical conditions and approximate age of diagnosis)
    • Family medical history (medical history of immediate biological family members)
    • Health care access and utilization (self-reported use of various health services)

    There are currently three tiers of data access.

    • Public Tier: Anonymized, aggregate data that can be viewed with the Data Browser.
    • Registered Tier: Contains individual-level data and is available only to approved researchers on the Researcher Workbench. Authorized users also have access to tools such as the Cohort Builder, Jupyter Notebooks, and Dataset Builder.
    • Controlled Tier: Includes genomic data in the form of whole genome sequencing and genotyping arrays, demographic data fields from EHRs and surveys that are suppressed in other tiers, and unshifted dates.

  2. d

    All of Us

    • dknet.org
    • rrid.site
    Updated Jun 16, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). All of Us [Dataset]. http://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_027032
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2025
    Description

    Portal stores health data from participants from across the United States. Provides interactive Data Browser where anyone can learn about the type and quantity of data that All of Us collects. Users can explore aggregate data including genomic variants, survey responses, physical measurements, electronic health record information, and wearables data.

  3. All of us (AoU) cohort and NHIS participant characteristics.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jul 17, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lauryn Keeler Bruce; Paulina Paul; Katherine K. Kim; Jihoon Kim; Theresa H. M. Keegan; Robert A. Hiatt; Lucila Ohno-Machado (2023). All of us (AoU) cohort and NHIS participant characteristics. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288496.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 17, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Lauryn Keeler Bruce; Paulina Paul; Katherine K. Kim; Jihoon Kim; Theresa H. M. Keegan; Robert A. Hiatt; Lucila Ohno-Machado
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    All of us (AoU) cohort and NHIS participant characteristics.

  4. f

    Data from: Social determinants associated with loss of an eye in the United...

    • tandf.figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jan 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alison X. Chan; Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar; Daniel J. Ozzello; Michelle Ting; Jin Sook Yoon; Catherine Y. Liu; Bobby S. Korn; Don O. Kikkawa; Sally L. Baxter (2024). Social determinants associated with loss of an eye in the United States using the All of Us nationwide database [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17707929.v1
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 26, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Taylor & Francis
    Authors
    Alison X. Chan; Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar; Daniel J. Ozzello; Michelle Ting; Jin Sook Yoon; Catherine Y. Liu; Bobby S. Korn; Don O. Kikkawa; Sally L. Baxter
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    To identify common factors associated with the loss of an eye using the NIH All of Us database. In this case-controlled study, we extracted electronic health record and socio-demographic data for 231 cases of eye loss from All of Us enrollment sites. Controls (N = 924) matched the demographic characteristics of the 2020 United States Census. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression identified variables significantly associated with increased odds of eye loss. Medical and social determinants associated with increased odds of losing an eye. Among cases, the average age (standard deviation) was 60.1 (14.4) years. The majority (125, 54.1%) were male. 87 (37.7%) identified as African American, and 49 (21.2%) identified as Hispanic or Latino. Loss of eye was more likely in those with ocular tumor (odds ratio [OR] 421.73, 25 95% confidence interval [CI] 129.81–1959.80, p < .001), trauma (OR 13.38, 95% CI 6.64–27.43, p < .001), infection (OR 11.46, 95% CI 4.11–32.26, p = .001) or glaucoma (OR 8.33, 95% CI 4.43– 15.81, p < .001). African American (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.39–4.09, p = .002) and Hispanic or Latino (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.01–3.15, p = .04) participants were disproportionately affected. Racial and ethnic disparities exist among those with loss of an eye from underlying conditions. Addressing health inequities may mitigate the risk of this morbid outcome.

  5. m

    Ahmed F, et al. Rosacea Diagnosis and Prescription Patterns in...

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Mar 22, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Fadwa Ahmed (2023). Ahmed F, et al. Rosacea Diagnosis and Prescription Patterns in Underrepresented Groups: An All of Us Database Analysis. JAAD. 2023. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/ydrf8vp9sn.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 22, 2023
    Authors
    Fadwa Ahmed
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Supplemental methods and results.

  6. f

    Additional file 2 of Whole-genome sequencing as an investigational device...

    • springernature.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Jun 5, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eric Venner; Donna Muzny; Joshua D. Smith; Kimberly Walker; Cynthia L. Neben; Christina M. Lockwood; Phillip E. Empey; Ginger A. Metcalf; Chris Kachulis; Sana Mian; Anjene Musick; Heidi L. Rehm; Steven Harrison; Stacey Gabriel; Richard A. Gibbs; Deborah Nickerson; Alicia Y. Zhou; Kimberly Doheny; Bradley Ozenberger; Scott E. Topper; Niall J. Lennon (2023). Additional file 2 of Whole-genome sequencing as an investigational device for return of hereditary disease risk and pharmacogenomic results as part of the All of Us Research Program [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19445479.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 5, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Eric Venner; Donna Muzny; Joshua D. Smith; Kimberly Walker; Cynthia L. Neben; Christina M. Lockwood; Phillip E. Empey; Ginger A. Metcalf; Chris Kachulis; Sana Mian; Anjene Musick; Heidi L. Rehm; Steven Harrison; Stacey Gabriel; Richard A. Gibbs; Deborah Nickerson; Alicia Y. Zhou; Kimberly Doheny; Bradley Ozenberger; Scott E. Topper; Niall J. Lennon
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Additional file 2. Reportable region in bed format.

  7. f

    The relative distribution and prevalence of cancer cases by type in the All...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Paul Zakin; Andrew Craver; Sameep Shah; Muhammad G. Kibriya; Elizabeth Stepniak; Andrea Ramirez; Cheryl Clark; Elizabeth Cohn; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Mine Cicek; Eric Boerwinkle; Sheri D. Schully; Stephen Mockrin; Kelly Gebo; Kelsey Mayo; Francis Ratsimbazafy; Alan Sanders; Raj C. Shah; Maria Argos; Joyce Ho; Karen Kim; Martha Daviglus; Philip Greenland; Habibul Ahsan (2023). The relative distribution and prevalence of cancer cases by type in the All of Us Research Program from self-reported survey data and electronic medical record by race/ethnicity. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272522.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Paul Zakin; Andrew Craver; Sameep Shah; Muhammad G. Kibriya; Elizabeth Stepniak; Andrea Ramirez; Cheryl Clark; Elizabeth Cohn; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Mine Cicek; Eric Boerwinkle; Sheri D. Schully; Stephen Mockrin; Kelly Gebo; Kelsey Mayo; Francis Ratsimbazafy; Alan Sanders; Raj C. Shah; Maria Argos; Joyce Ho; Karen Kim; Martha Daviglus; Philip Greenland; Habibul Ahsan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The relative distribution and prevalence of cancer cases by type in the All of Us Research Program from self-reported survey data and electronic medical record by race/ethnicity.

  8. m

    Mendeley Supplement Methods I for "Examining the burden of psoriasis and...

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Apr 4, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Meg T (2023). Mendeley Supplement Methods I for "Examining the burden of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a diverse US adult cohort using the All of Us Research Program" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/cj2whjf27b.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 4, 2023
    Authors
    Meg T
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Supplementary Methods

  9. f

    Data from: Pharmacogenomic heterogeneity of N-acetyltransferase 2: a...

    • tandf.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Apr 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Levin Thomas; Chaithra; Yashi Batra; Mitali Mathur; Shrivathsa Kulavalli; Chidananda Sanju SV; Naveen Dutt; Pankaj Bhardwaj; Muralidhar Varma; Kavitha Saravu; Mithu Banerjee; Mahadev Rao (2025). Pharmacogenomic heterogeneity of N-acetyltransferase 2: a comprehensive analysis of real world data in Indian tuberculosis patients and from literature and database review [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28776427.v1
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 11, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Taylor & Francis
    Authors
    Levin Thomas; Chaithra; Yashi Batra; Mitali Mathur; Shrivathsa Kulavalli; Chidananda Sanju SV; Naveen Dutt; Pankaj Bhardwaj; Muralidhar Varma; Kavitha Saravu; Mithu Banerjee; Mahadev Rao
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Isoniazid is primarily metabolized by the arylamine N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) enzyme. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the NAT2 gene could classify an individual into three distinct phenotypes: rapid, intermediate and slow acetylators. NAT2 SNPs and the slow acetylator phenotype have been implicated as risk factors for the development of antitubercular drug-induced liver injury (AT-DILI) in several tuberculosis (TB) populations. We conducted a prospective observational study to characterize and compare the NAT2 SNPs, genotypes and phenotypes among patients with TB and AT-DILI from the Southern and Western regions of India. The NAT2 pharmacogenomic profile of patients from these regions was compared with the reports from several geographically diverse TB populations and participants of different genetic ancestries extracted from literature reviews and the ‘All of Us’ Research Program database, respectively. The TB patients of Southern and Western regions of India and several other geographically closer regions exhibited near similar NAT2 MAF characteristics. However significant heterogeneity in NAT2 SNPs was observed within and between countries among AT-DILI populations and the participants of different genetic ancestry from the ‘All of Us’ Research Program database. The MAF of the NAT2 SNPs rs1041983, rs1801280, rs1799929, rs1799930 and rs1208 of the TB patients from Southern and Western Indian Sites were in near range to that of the South Asian genetic ancestry of ‘All of Us’ Research Program database. About one-third of the total TB patients from the Southern and Western regions of India were NAT2 slow acetylators, among whom a relatively higher proportion experienced AT-DILI. Further studies exploring the risk of NAT2 SNPs in different AT-DILI patients with larger sample sizes and a population-specific approach are required to establish a policy for NAT2 genotyping as a pre-emptive biomarker for AT-DILI monitoring for personalized isoniazid therapy in clinics.

  10. Prevalence and incidence of EHR-derived AF by age, sex, and race/ethnicity,...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alvaro Alonso; Aniqa B. Alam; Hooman Kamel; Vignesh Subbian; Jun Qian; Eric Boerwinkle; Mine Cicek; Cheryl R. Clark; Elizabeth G. Cohn; Kelly A. Gebo; Roxana Loperena-Cortes; Kelsey R. Mayo; Stephen Mockrin; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Sheri D. Schully; Andrea H. Ramirez; Philip Greenland (2023). Prevalence and incidence of EHR-derived AF by age, sex, and race/ethnicity, All of Us Research Program, 2017–2019. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265498.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Alvaro Alonso; Aniqa B. Alam; Hooman Kamel; Vignesh Subbian; Jun Qian; Eric Boerwinkle; Mine Cicek; Cheryl R. Clark; Elizabeth G. Cohn; Kelly A. Gebo; Roxana Loperena-Cortes; Kelsey R. Mayo; Stephen Mockrin; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Sheri D. Schully; Andrea H. Ramirez; Philip Greenland
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Prevalence and incidence of EHR-derived AF by age, sex, and race/ethnicity, All of Us Research Program, 2017–2019.

  11. Time from diagnosis of cancer cases and approximate age at diagnosis by type...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Paul Zakin; Andrew Craver; Sameep Shah; Muhammad G. Kibriya; Elizabeth Stepniak; Andrea Ramirez; Cheryl Clark; Elizabeth Cohn; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Mine Cicek; Eric Boerwinkle; Sheri D. Schully; Stephen Mockrin; Kelly Gebo; Kelsey Mayo; Francis Ratsimbazafy; Alan Sanders; Raj C. Shah; Maria Argos; Joyce Ho; Karen Kim; Martha Daviglus; Philip Greenland; Habibul Ahsan (2023). Time from diagnosis of cancer cases and approximate age at diagnosis by type in the All of Us Research Program. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272522.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Paul Zakin; Andrew Craver; Sameep Shah; Muhammad G. Kibriya; Elizabeth Stepniak; Andrea Ramirez; Cheryl Clark; Elizabeth Cohn; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Mine Cicek; Eric Boerwinkle; Sheri D. Schully; Stephen Mockrin; Kelly Gebo; Kelsey Mayo; Francis Ratsimbazafy; Alan Sanders; Raj C. Shah; Maria Argos; Joyce Ho; Karen Kim; Martha Daviglus; Philip Greenland; Habibul Ahsan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Time from diagnosis of cancer cases and approximate age at diagnosis by type in the All of Us Research Program.

  12. Multivariable model for prevalent and incident AF (odds ratio or hazard...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alvaro Alonso; Aniqa B. Alam; Hooman Kamel; Vignesh Subbian; Jun Qian; Eric Boerwinkle; Mine Cicek; Cheryl R. Clark; Elizabeth G. Cohn; Kelly A. Gebo; Roxana Loperena-Cortes; Kelsey R. Mayo; Stephen Mockrin; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Sheri D. Schully; Andrea H. Ramirez; Philip Greenland (2023). Multivariable model for prevalent and incident AF (odds ratio or hazard ratio for covariates), All of Us Research Program 2017–2019. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265498.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Alvaro Alonso; Aniqa B. Alam; Hooman Kamel; Vignesh Subbian; Jun Qian; Eric Boerwinkle; Mine Cicek; Cheryl R. Clark; Elizabeth G. Cohn; Kelly A. Gebo; Roxana Loperena-Cortes; Kelsey R. Mayo; Stephen Mockrin; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Sheri D. Schully; Andrea H. Ramirez; Philip Greenland
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Multivariable model for prevalent and incident AF (odds ratio or hazard ratio for covariates), All of Us Research Program 2017–2019.

  13. f

    Comparison of relative distribution and prevalence of cancer cases by type...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Paul Zakin; Andrew Craver; Sameep Shah; Muhammad G. Kibriya; Elizabeth Stepniak; Andrea Ramirez; Cheryl Clark; Elizabeth Cohn; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Mine Cicek; Eric Boerwinkle; Sheri D. Schully; Stephen Mockrin; Kelly Gebo; Kelsey Mayo; Francis Ratsimbazafy; Alan Sanders; Raj C. Shah; Maria Argos; Joyce Ho; Karen Kim; Martha Daviglus; Philip Greenland; Habibul Ahsan (2023). Comparison of relative distribution and prevalence of cancer cases by type in the All of Us Research Program to SEER’s 26-year limited duration prevalence. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272522.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Paul Zakin; Andrew Craver; Sameep Shah; Muhammad G. Kibriya; Elizabeth Stepniak; Andrea Ramirez; Cheryl Clark; Elizabeth Cohn; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Mine Cicek; Eric Boerwinkle; Sheri D. Schully; Stephen Mockrin; Kelly Gebo; Kelsey Mayo; Francis Ratsimbazafy; Alan Sanders; Raj C. Shah; Maria Argos; Joyce Ho; Karen Kim; Martha Daviglus; Philip Greenland; Habibul Ahsan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Comparison of relative distribution and prevalence of cancer cases by type in the All of Us Research Program to SEER’s 26-year limited duration prevalence.

  14. Participant characteristics by veteran status–All of Us research program (n...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Nov 22, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hind A. Beydoun; Christian Mayno Vieytes; May A. Beydoun; Austin Lampros; Jack Tsai (2024). Participant characteristics by veteran status–All of Us research program (n = 254,079)a. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314339.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Hind A. Beydoun; Christian Mayno Vieytes; May A. Beydoun; Austin Lampros; Jack Tsai
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Participant characteristics by veteran status–All of Us research program (n = 254,079)a.

  15. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
All of Us Research Program (2025). All of Us Research Hub [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.med.nyu.edu/dataset/10421

All of Us Research Hub

Explore at:
Dataset updated
May 8, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
All of Us Research Program
Time period covered
Jan 1, 2017 - Present
Area covered
Delaware, Wyoming, Maryland, Vermont, Kansas, Hawaii, Washington, D.C., Illinois, West Virginia, Louisiana
Description

With an emphasis on reaching historically underrepresented populations, the All of Us Research Program recruits adults aged 18 and above across the United States to share their health data to enable new insights into human health and research on precision medicine. Participants contribute electronic health records (EHR), survey responses, biospecimens, wearable devices (biometrics), and physical measurements.

The six All of Us surveys assess the areas listed below:

  • Basic demographic information
  • Lifestyle/substance use (i.e., tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs)
  • Overall health (general health status, daily activities, and women’s health)
  • Medical history (medical conditions and approximate age of diagnosis)
  • Family medical history (medical history of immediate biological family members)
  • Health care access and utilization (self-reported use of various health services)

There are currently three tiers of data access.

  • Public Tier: Anonymized, aggregate data that can be viewed with the Data Browser.
  • Registered Tier: Contains individual-level data and is available only to approved researchers on the Researcher Workbench. Authorized users also have access to tools such as the Cohort Builder, Jupyter Notebooks, and Dataset Builder.
  • Controlled Tier: Includes genomic data in the form of whole genome sequencing and genotyping arrays, demographic data fields from EHRs and surveys that are suppressed in other tiers, and unshifted dates.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu