This Layer is the result of Data pipeline: Alternative Fuel Stations in Los AngelesThe Layer is updated weekly (the underlaying layer covering US and Canada is updated daily) on Sundays around 11 pm.Alternative fuel sources include biodiesel, compressed natural gas, electric, ethanol, hydrogen, liquefied natural gas, propane and renewable diesel. Attributes include the station name, location, access, hours and more. Zoom into the map for more detail.This data is maintained by an Aggregated Live Feed routine that accesses the US Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) API website.source: NREL Alternate Fuel Stations (ALL)

This packaged data collection contains two sets of two additional model runs that used the same inputs and parameters as our primary model, with the exception being we implemented a "maximum corridor length" constraint that allowed us to identify and visualize the corridors as being well-connected (≤15km) or moderately connected (≤45km). This is based on an assumption that corridors longer than 45km are too long to sufficiently accommodate dispersal. One of these sets is based on a maximum corridor length that uses Euclidean (straight-line) distance, while the other set is based on a maximum corridor length that uses cost-weighted distance. These two sets of corridors can be compared against the full set of corridors from our primary model to identify the remaining corridors, which could be considered poorly connected. This package includes the following data layers: Corridors classified as well connected (≤15km) based on Cost-weighted Distance Corridors classified as moderately connected (≤45km) based on Cost-weighted Distance Corridors classified as well connected (≤15km) based on Euclidean Distance Corridors classified as moderately connected (≤45km) based on Euclidean Distance Please refer to the embedded metadata and the information in our full report for details on the development of these data layers. Packaged data are available in two formats: Geodatabase (.gdb): A related set of file geodatabase rasters and feature classes, packaged in an ESRI file geodatabase. ArcGIS Pro Map Package (.mpkx): The same data included in the geodatabase, presented as fully-symbolized layers in a map. Note that you must have ArcGIS Pro version 2.0 or greater to view. See Cross-References for links to individual datasets, which can be downloaded in raster GeoTIFF (.tif) format.

Locations for alternative fuel in Los Angeles CountyThis dataset is maintained through the County of Los Angeles Location Management System. The Location Management System is used by the County of Los Angeles GIS Program to maintain a single, comprehensive geographic database of locations countywide. For more information on the Location Management System, visit http://egis3.lacounty.gov/lms/.

The Alternative Fueling Stations dataset is updated daily from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). For more information about the update cycle and data collection methods, please refer to https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/#/find/nearest?show_about=true. This dataset shows all station access types (public and private) and statuses (available, planned, and temporarily unavailable) by default. To view only publicly available stations, use the access and status filters. The U.S. Department of Energy collects these data in partnership with Clean Cities coalitions and their stakeholders to help fleets and consumers find alternative fueling stations. Clean Cities coalitions foster the nation's economic, environmental, and energy security by working locally to advance affordable, efficient, and clean transportation fuels and technologies. This data can be found on the Alternative Fuels Data Center: https://doi.org/10.21949/1519144. For more information about the data schema and data dictionary, please see https://developer.nrel.gov/docs/transportation/alt-fuel-stations-v1/all/#response-fields. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1529008

The global GIS mapping tools market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $28 billion by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the burgeoning adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced accessibility to a wider user base, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Secondly, the escalating need for precise spatial data analysis in various applications, such as urban planning, geological exploration, and water resource management, is significantly boosting market demand. The increasing integration of GIS with other technologies like AI and IoT further amplifies its capabilities, leading to more sophisticated applications and increased market penetration. Finally, government initiatives promoting digitalization and smart city development across the globe are indirectly fueling this market expansion. However, certain restraints limit market growth. The high initial investment cost for advanced GIS software and the requirement for skilled professionals to operate these systems can be a barrier, especially for smaller organizations. Additionally, data security and privacy concerns related to the handling of sensitive geographical information pose challenges to wider adoption. Market segmentation reveals strong growth in the cloud-based GIS segment, driven by its inherent advantages, while applications in urban planning and geological exploration lead the application-based segmentation. North America and Europe currently hold significant market shares, with strong growth potential in the Asia-Pacific region due to increasing infrastructure development and government investments. Leading companies like Esri, Hexagon, and Autodesk are shaping the market landscape through continuous innovation and competitive pricing strategies, while the emergence of open-source options like QGIS and GRASS GIS provides alternative, cost-effective solutions.

The Alternative GWPC layer is to be used when evaluating the Alternative GWPC provision, section 22a-133k-3(d)(2) of the RSRs, amended on February 16, 2021. This layer represents the GA groundwater classification area where an Alternative GWPC could be eligible if a groundwater plume is located in the designated Alternative Groundwater Protection Criteria area and all other requirements of 22a-133k-3(d)(2) have been satisfied. The layer provides more flexibility in achieving groundwater compliance in areas with no current or future drinking water use.

The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) designates a national network of plug-in electric vehicle (EV) charging and hydrogen, propane, and natural gas fueling infrastructure along national highway system corridors. To designate these Alternative Fuel Corridors (AFC), FHWA solicits nominations from state and local officials and works with other federal officials and industry stakeholders. Highways designed as AFCs are eligible for California's NEVI funding program. This layer displays all of the designated AFCs in California.

This layer is the example dataset provided in the original GitHub Repository for Action 2017.2 on INSPIRE Alternative Encodings from the INSPIRE JRC MIG-T Action 2017.2. It is provided herein as Alternative Encodings Draft GeoJSON imported into ArcGIS Online; this hosted Feature Layer was created from the GeoJSON at the time of import. This layer demonstrates the simplified/flattened address schema developed under MIG-T Action 2017.2 following the guidance provided for community implementations. The remainder of the ArcGIS INSPIRE Open Data streamlined fGDB templates in this collection follow the guidance and document templates laid out by Action 2017.2.Note: This Address point dataset contains only one point as provided through the GitHub Repository.

The Alternative Fuel Corridors dataset was created in 2016 and was updated on January 16, 2025 with new Round 8 designations from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset is a highway layer of corridors, primarily along the NHS, that are designated as Corridor Ready or Corridor Pending. It includes designations of five types of alternative fuels, Electric Vehicle Charging (EV), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Propane (LPG), and Hydrogen. Corridor-ready segments currently contain a sufficient number of fueling facilities to allow for corridor travel with the designated alternative fuel, and to qualify for highway signage. Corridors that do not have sufficient alternative fuel facilities to support alternative fuel vehicle travel are designated as corridor pending. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1529007

Chugach National Forest Mangement Area Alternatives 2018

THE GEOINQUIRIES™ COLLECTION FOR MATHEMATICS

http://www.esri.com/geoinquiries

The GeoInquiry™ collection for Mathematics contains 15 free, standards-based activities that correspond and extend spatial concepts found in course textbooks frequently used in introductory algebra or geometry classes. The activities use a common inquiry-based instructional model, require only 15 minutes to deliver, and are device/laptop agnostic. Each activity includes an ArcGIS Online map but requires no login or installation. The activities harmonize with the Common Core mathematics national curriculum standards.

All Mathematics GeoInquiries™ can be found at: http://eseriurl.com/mathGeoInquiries

All GeoInquiries™ can be found at: http://www.esri.com/geoinquiries

This shapefile contains the 2000-foot-wide corridor Recommended Alternative identified in the Interstate 11 (I-11) Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The shapefile projection system is NAD 83 (2011) State Plane Arizona Central (WKID 6405). The Recommended Alternative is based primarily on the Purple and Green Alternatives, but is a hybrid alignment (i.e. a combintation of Corridor Options from the Build Corridor Alternatives) in an effort to avoid adverse effects. More information about the I-11 DEIS, and the Recommended Alternative can be found at the project website (http://i11study.com/Arizona/index.asp).

Geolocations provided by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Clean Cities Technical Response Service. These locations are those used in the Alternative Fuels Data Center Station Locator, web mapping service (http://www.afdc.energy.gov/locator/stations/). The locations were geocoded by the use of GPS or specialized software - the accuracy of these is at address-level. Field descriptions can be found at: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/data_download/alt_fuel_stations_format

As part of the Federal Highway Administration Surface Transportation Program, the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) is a reimbursable federal aid funding program for transportation related community projects designed to strengthen the intermodal transportation system.It provides funding for projects that enhance the cultural, aesthetic, historic, and environmental aspects of the intermodal transportation system. The program can assist in funding projects that create bicycle and pedestrian facilities, restore historic transportation buildings, convert abandoned railway corridors to pedestrian trails, mitigate highway runoff, and other transportation related enhancements.

All of Florida's surface waters are classified according to designated uses (Classes I-V). Water quality criteria that support the classes (and therefore, uses) apply uniformly to all waters within the state that have the same classification. Florida recognizes that with the variety of waters found here and a broad approach to them, there may be situations where a generally applicable statewide criterion may not be appropriate for a waterbody or portion of a waterbody. A Site Specific Alternative Criterion, or SSAC, is a water quality criterion developed for a particular waterbody or segment of a waterbody that is designed to more accurately reflect site specific conditions. Criteria, including site specific criteria, are one of the components of Florida?s surface water quality standards, and are intended to protect designated and existing uses of the state waters. Development of an approvable site specific criterion is dependent on a demonstration that the different water quality criterion is more appropriate for the waterbody than the one normally used for the classification. A SSAC recognizes and accounts for the specific needs of the biological community native to the waterbody to make sure they are fully protected. When approved, a SSAC is used instead of (or sometimes in conjunction with) the surface water criterion that applies to the waters for that classification.This data layer should be used on conjunction with the surface water classification data layers (poly and line).

Maryland locations of Liquefied Natural Gas Fuel Stations, Compressed Natural Gas Fuel Stations, Biodiesel Fuel Stations, and Electric Vehicle Charging Stations.

This app enables you to compare different views of the World Imagery map. The default World Imagery map, on the left, is designed to show the most recent imagery. The alternative World Imagery (Clarity) map, on the right, is designed to show other imagery from our archive that may be more clear or accurate. You can use the tabs to view different bookmarked locations, or the search tool to view other areas. Click on the maps to get metadata info for the imagery.

This layer displays landings proposed to support timber harvest as part of alternatives for the Telephone Gap IRP.

The Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary Final Management Plan (2012), called out an action plan for sanctuary expansion. These boundaries represent alternative III for sanctuary expansion. These boundaries are part of ongoing NEPA/EIS review process, which will define the preffered alternative. Boundaries were created in NAD83. The National Marine Sanctuary Program manages a system of sanctuaries and other managed areas around the country. The legal boundaries of these sanctuaries are defined within the Code of Federal Regulations, at 15 C.F.R. Part 922 and the subparts for each national marine sanctuary. The GIS compatible digital boundary files for each national marine sanctuary are representations of those legal boundaries and are based on the best available data. These files are available for public use at locations defined in this metadata record. Updated November 2015.