This packaged data collection contains two sets of two additional model runs that used the same inputs and parameters as our primary model, with the exception being we implemented a "maximum corridor length" constraint that allowed us to identify and visualize the corridors as being well-connected (≤15km) or moderately connected (≤45km). This is based on an assumption that corridors longer than 45km are too long to sufficiently accommodate dispersal. One of these sets is based on a maximum corridor length that uses Euclidean (straight-line) distance, while the other set is based on a maximum corridor length that uses cost-weighted distance. These two sets of corridors can be compared against the full set of corridors from our primary model to identify the remaining corridors, which could be considered poorly connected. This package includes the following data layers: Corridors classified as well connected (≤15km) based on Cost-weighted Distance Corridors classified as moderately connected (≤45km) based on Cost-weighted Distance Corridors classified as well connected (≤15km) based on Euclidean Distance Corridors classified as moderately connected (≤45km) based on Euclidean Distance Please refer to the embedded metadata and the information in our full report for details on the development of these data layers. Packaged data are available in two formats: Geodatabase (.gdb): A related set of file geodatabase rasters and feature classes, packaged in an ESRI file geodatabase. ArcGIS Pro Map Package (.mpkx): The same data included in the geodatabase, presented as fully-symbolized layers in a map. Note that you must have ArcGIS Pro version 2.0 or greater to view. See Cross-References for links to individual datasets, which can be downloaded in raster GeoTIFF (.tif) format.
Data layers that document the spatial alternatives for the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Restoration Blueprint's Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Includes spatial data for the four proposed boundary and marine zone alternatives. Related Products:Interactive Mapping ApplicationExplore Alternatives - Story MapSpatial Alternatives Web Map GIS Data - Feature Service
The Alternative Fueling Stations dataset is updated daily from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). For more information about the update cycle and data collection methods, please refer to https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/#/find/nearest?show_about=true. This dataset shows all station access types (public and private) and statuses (available, planned, and temporarily unavailable) by default. To view only publicly available stations, use the access and status filters. The U.S. Department of Energy collects these data in partnership with Clean Cities coalitions and their stakeholders to help fleets and consumers find alternative fueling stations. Clean Cities coalitions foster the nation's economic, environmental, and energy security by working locally to advance affordable, efficient, and clean transportation fuels and technologies. This data can be found on the Alternative Fuels Data Center: https://doi.org/10.21949/1519144. For more information about the data schema and data dictionary, please see https://developer.nrel.gov/docs/transportation/alt-fuel-stations-v1/all/#response-fields. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1529008
Geoform is a configurable app template for form based data editing of a Feature Service. This application allows users to enter data through a form instead of a map's pop-up while leveraging the power of the Web Map and editable Feature Services. This app geo-enables data and workflows by lowering the barrier of entry for completing simple tasks. Use CasesProvides a form-based experience for entering data through a form instead of a map pop-up. This is a good choice for users who find forms a more intuitive format than pop-ups for entering data.Useful to collect new point data from a large audience of non technical staff or members of the community.Configurable OptionsGeoform has an interactive builder used to configure the app in a step-by-step process. Use Geoform to collect new point data and configure it using the following options:Choose a web map and the editable layer(s) to be used for collection.Provide a title, logo image, and form instructions/details.Control and choose what attribute fields will be present in the form. Customize how they appear in the form, the order they appear in, and add hint text.Select from over 15 different layout themes.Choose the display field that will be used for sorting when viewing submitted entries.Enable offline support, social media sharing, default map extent, locate on load, and a basemap toggle button.Choose which locate methods are available in the form, including: current location, search, latitude and longitude, USNG coordinates, MGRS coordinates, and UTM coordinates.Supported DevicesThis application is responsively designed to support use in browsers on desktops, mobile phones, and tablets.Data RequirementsThis web app includes the capability to edit a hosted feature service or an ArcGIS Server feature service. Creating hosted feature services requires an ArcGIS Online organizational subscription or an ArcGIS Developer account. Get Started This application can be created in the following ways:Click the Create a Web App button on this pageShare a map and choose to Create a Web AppOn the Content page, click Create - App - From Template Click the Download button to access the source code. Do this if you want to host the app on your own server and optionally customize it to add features or change styling.
Locations for alternative fuel in Los Angeles CountyThis dataset is maintained through the County of Los Angeles Location Management System. The Location Management System is used by the County of Los Angeles GIS Program to maintain a single, comprehensive geographic database of locations countywide. For more information on the Location Management System, visithttp://egis3.lacounty.gov/lms/.
The way to access Layers Quickly.
Quick Layers is an Add-In for ArcGIS Pro 3 that allows rapid access to the DNR's Geospatial Data Resource Site (GDRS). The GDRS is a data structure that serves core geospatial dataset and applications for not only DNR, but many state agencies, and supports the Minnesota Geospatial Commons. Data added from Quick Layers is pre-symbolized, helping to standardize visualization and map production. Current version: 3.11
To use Quick Layers with the GDRS, there's no need to download QuickLayers from this location. Instead, download a full copy or a custom subset of the public GDRS (including Quick Layers for ArcGIS Pro 3) using GDRS Manager.
Quick Layers also allows users to save and share their own pre-symbolized layers, thus increasing efficiency and consistency across the enterprise.
Installation:
After using GDRS Manager to create a GDRS, including Quick Layers, add the path to the Quick Layers addin to the list of shared folders:
1. Open ArcGIS Pro
2. Project -> Add-In Manager -> Options
3. Click add folder, and enter the location of the Quick Layers Pro app. For example, if your GDRS is mapped to the V drive, the path would be V:\gdrs\apps\pub\us_mn_state_dnr\quick_layers_pro3
4. After you do this, the Quick Layers ribbon will be available. To also add Quick Layers to the Quick Access Toolbar at the top, right click Quick Layers, and select Add to Quick Access Toolbar
The link below is only for those who are using Quick Layers without a GDRS. To get the most functionality out of Quick Layers, don't install it separately, but instead download it as part of a GDRS build using GDRS Manager.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This abstract contains links to public ArcGIS maps that include locations of carbonate springs and some of their characteristics. Information for accessing and navigating through the maps are included in a PowerPoint presentation IN THE FILE UPLOAD SECTION BELOW. Three separate data sets are included in the maps:
Several base maps are included in the links. The US carbonate map describes and categorizes carbonates (e.g., depth from surface, overlying geology/ice, climate). The carbonate springs map categorizes springs as being urban, specifically within 1000 ft of a road, or rural. The basis for this categorization was that the heat island effect defines urban as within a 1000 ft of a road. There are other methods for defining urban versus rural to consider. Map links and details of the information they contain are listed below.
Map set 1: The WQP map provides three mapping options separated by the parameters available at each spring site. These maps summarize discrete water quality samples, but not data logger availability. Information at each spring provides links for where users can explore further data.
Option 1: WQP data with urban and rural springs labeled, with highlight of springs with or without NWIS data https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=2ce914ec01f14c20b58146f5d9702d8a
Options 2: WQP data by major ions and a few other solutes https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=5a114d2ce24c473ca07ef9625cd834b8
Option 3:WQP data by various carbon species https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ae406f1bdcd14f78881905c5e0915b96
Map 2: The worldwide carbonate map in the WoKaS data set (citation below) includes a description of carbonate purity and distribution of urban and rural springs, for which discharge data are available: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=5ab43fdb2b784acf8bef85b61d0ebcbe.
Reference: Olarinoye, T., Gleeson, T., Marx, V., Seeger, S., Adinehvand, R., Allocca, V., Andreo, B., Apaéstegui, J., Apolit, C., Arfib, B. and Auler, A., 2020. Global karst springs hydrograph dataset for research and management of the world’s fastest-flowing groundwater. Scientific Data, 7(1), pp.1-9.
Map 3: Karst and spring data from selected states: This map includes sites that members of the RCN have suggested to our group.
https://uageos.maps.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=28ed22a14bb749e2b22ece82bf8a8177
This data set is incomplete (as of October 13, 2022 it includes Florida and Missouri). We are looking for more information. You can share data links to additional data by typing them into the hydroshare page created for our group. Then new sites will periodically be added to the map: https://www.hydroshare.org/resource/0cf10e9808fa4c5b9e6a7852323e6b11/
Acknowledgements: These maps were created by Michael Jones, University of Arkansas and Shishir Sarker, University of Kentucky with help from Laura Toran and Francesco Navarro, Temple University.
TIPS FOR NAVIGATING THE MAPS ARE IN THE POWERPOINT DOCUMENT IN THE FILE UPLOAD SECTION BELOW.
This table summarizes the potential permits associated with an alternative beach nourishment program and is referenced in A Technical Memorandum Describing Recommendations for an Alternative to Annual Parcel-by-Parcel Beach Nourishment Programs. Please see technical memorandum for more information.
The Alternative Fuel Corridors dataset was created in 2016 and was updated on January 16, 2025 with new Round 8 designations from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset is a highway layer of corridors, primarily along the NHS, that are designated as Corridor Ready or Corridor Pending. It includes designations of five types of alternative fuels, Electric Vehicle Charging (EV), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Propane (LPG), and Hydrogen. Corridor-ready segments currently contain a sufficient number of fueling facilities to allow for corridor travel with the designated alternative fuel, and to qualify for highway signage. Corridors that do not have sufficient alternative fuel facilities to support alternative fuel vehicle travel are designated as corridor pending. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1529007
WorldClim 2.1 provides downscaled estimates of climate variables as monthly means over the period of 1970-2000 based on interpolated station measurements. Here we provide analytical image services of precipitation for each month along with an annual mean. Each time step is accessible from a processing template.Time Extent: Monthly/Annual 1970-2000Units: mm/monthCell Size: 2.5 minutes (~5 km)Source Type: StretchedPixel Type: 16 Bit IntegerData Projection: GCS WGS84Mosaic Projection: GCS WGS84Extent: GlobalSource: WorldClim v2.1Using Processing Templates to Access TimeThere are 13 processing templates applied to this service, each providing access to the 12 monthly and 1 annual mean precipitation layers. To apply these in ArcGIS Online, select the Image Display options on the layer. Then pull down the list of variables from the Renderer options. Click Apply and Close. In ArcGIS Pro, go into the Layer Properties. Select Processing Templates from the left-hand menu. From the Processing Template pull down menu, select the version to display.What can you do with this layer?This layer may be added to maps to visualize and quickly interrogate each pixel value. The pop-up provides a graph of the time series along with the calculated annual mean value.This layer can be used in analysis. For example, the layer may be added to ArcGIS Pro and an area count of precipitation may be produced for a feature dataset using the zonal statistics tool. Statistics may be compared with the statistics from month to month to show seasonal patterns.To calculate precipitation by land area, or any other analysis, be sure to use an equal area projection, such as Albers or Equal Earth.Source Data: The datasets behind this layer were extracted from GeoTIF files produced by WorldClim at 2.5 minutes resolution. The mean of the 12 GeoTIFs was calculated (annual), and the 13 rasters were converted to Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF format and added to a mosaic dataset.Citation: Fick, S.E. and R.J. Hijmans, 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37 (12): 4302-4315.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Missouri Valley Bypass CP3 Alternatives Recap
The Alternative GWPC layer is to be used when evaluating the Alternative GWPC provision, section 22a-133k-3(d)(2) of the RSRs, amended on February 16, 2021. This layer represents the GA groundwater classification area where an Alternative GWPC could be eligible if a groundwater plume is located in the designated Alternative Groundwater Protection Criteria area and all other requirements of 22a-133k-3(d)(2) have been satisfied. The layer provides more flexibility in achieving groundwater compliance in areas with no current or future drinking water use.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Areas Undergoing Restoration Supporting TMDL Implementation (4b – Reasonable Assurance Plan or 4e – Pollutant Reduction). These are local restoration strategies similar to BMAPs, but developed without going through the BMAP process.
This Layer is the result of Data pipeline: Alternative Fuel Stations in Los AngelesThe Layer is updated weekly (the underlaying layer covering US and Canada is updated daily) on Sundays around 11 pm.Alternative fuel sources include biodiesel, compressed natural gas, electric, ethanol, hydrogen, liquefied natural gas, propane and renewable diesel. Attributes include the station name, location, access, hours and more. Zoom into the map for more detail.This data is maintained by an Aggregated Live Feed routine that accesses the US Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) API website.source: NREL Alternate Fuel Stations (ALL)
All of Florida's surface waters are classified according to designated uses (Classes I-V). Water quality criteria that support the classes (and therefore, uses) apply uniformly to all waters within the state that have the same classification. Florida recognizes that with the variety of waters found here and a broad approach to them, there may be situations where a generally applicable statewide criterion may not be appropriate for a waterbody or portion of a waterbody. A Site Specific Alternative Criterion, or SSAC, is a water quality criterion developed for a particular waterbody or segment of a waterbody that is designed to more accurately reflect site specific conditions. Criteria, including site specific criteria, are one of the components of Florida?s surface water quality standards, and are intended to protect designated and existing uses of the state waters. Development of an approvable site specific criterion is dependent on a demonstration that the different water quality criterion is more appropriate for the waterbody than the one normally used for the classification. A SSAC recognizes and accounts for the specific needs of the biological community native to the waterbody to make sure they are fully protected. When approved, a SSAC is used instead of (or sometimes in conjunction with) the surface water criterion that applies to the waters for that classification. This data layer should be used on conjunction with the surface water classification data layers (poly and line).
Chugach National Forest Mangement Area Alternatives 2018
Through a nationwide network of local coalitions, Clean Cities provides project assistance to help stakeholders in the public and private sectors deploy alternative and renewable fuels, idle-reduction measures, fuel economy improvements, and emerging transportation technologies. Department of Energy collects this data as part of the Projects undertaken by Clean Cities coalitions and stakeholders to ensure customers access to clean alternative energy. This data can be found at the Department of Energy Alternative Fuels Data Center Web Feature Service: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/locator/stations/. Clean Cities is the deployment arm of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Office.This is a MD iMAP hosted service layer. Find more information at https://imap.maryland.gov.Feature Service Layer Link:https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Transportation/MD_AlternativeFuel/FeatureServer/2
A common approach to simplify a problem with numerous objectives is to combine the cost layers into a composite a priori weighted single-objective raster grid. This dissertation examines new methods used for determining a spatially diverse set of near-optimal alternatives, and develops parallel computing techniques for brute-force near-optimal path enumeration, as well as more elegant methods that take advantage of the hierarchical structure of the underlying path-tree computation to select sets of spatially diverse near optimal paths.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
The Alternative Fueling Stations dataset is updated daily from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). For more information about the update cycle and data collection methods, please refer to https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/#/find/nearest?show_about=true. This dataset shows all station access types (public and private) and statuses (available, planned, and temporarily unavailable) by default. To view only publicly available stations, use the access and status filters. The U.S. Department of Energy collects these data in partnership with Clean Cities coalitions and their stakeholders to help fleets and consumers find alternative fueling stations. Clean Cities coalitions foster the nation's economic, environmental, and energy security by working locally to advance affordable, efficient, and clean transportation fuels and technologies. This data can be found on the Alternative Fuels Data Center: https://doi.org/10.21949/1519144. For more information about the data schema and data dictionary, please see https://developer.nrel.gov/docs/transportation/alt-fuel-stations-v1/all/#response-fields.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) was authorized by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) in 2012 and has been continued by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, through federal fiscal year 2020. Eligible project activities for TAP funding include a variety of smaller-scale transportation projects such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, and community improvements such as historic preservation, vegetation management, and some environmental mitigation related to storm water and habitat connectivity. Detailed information about Iowa’s TAP program may be found in the Iowa TAP Program Guidance. Additional information may be found in the program implementation guidance provided by the FHWA.
Iowa’s TAP program can be accessed in several ways. Statewide and multi-regional projects should apply directly to the Iowa DOT by October 1 annually for consideration in the Statewide TAP program. Access to smaller, local projects is dependent on geographic location and Iowa DOT endeavors to award projects based largely on geographic equity and local/regional priorities. Iowa’s small Metropolitan Planning Organizations and Regional Planning Affiliations will conduct an initial review of applications submitted for the competitive Local Projects TAP program administered by Iowa DOT. The large Metropolitan Planning Organizations (pop. greater than 200,000) will solicit and select project for TAP funding according to a process they determine. The map below will provide application submittal deadlines based on the project location.
This packaged data collection contains two sets of two additional model runs that used the same inputs and parameters as our primary model, with the exception being we implemented a "maximum corridor length" constraint that allowed us to identify and visualize the corridors as being well-connected (≤15km) or moderately connected (≤45km). This is based on an assumption that corridors longer than 45km are too long to sufficiently accommodate dispersal. One of these sets is based on a maximum corridor length that uses Euclidean (straight-line) distance, while the other set is based on a maximum corridor length that uses cost-weighted distance. These two sets of corridors can be compared against the full set of corridors from our primary model to identify the remaining corridors, which could be considered poorly connected. This package includes the following data layers: Corridors classified as well connected (≤15km) based on Cost-weighted Distance Corridors classified as moderately connected (≤45km) based on Cost-weighted Distance Corridors classified as well connected (≤15km) based on Euclidean Distance Corridors classified as moderately connected (≤45km) based on Euclidean Distance Please refer to the embedded metadata and the information in our full report for details on the development of these data layers. Packaged data are available in two formats: Geodatabase (.gdb): A related set of file geodatabase rasters and feature classes, packaged in an ESRI file geodatabase. ArcGIS Pro Map Package (.mpkx): The same data included in the geodatabase, presented as fully-symbolized layers in a map. Note that you must have ArcGIS Pro version 2.0 or greater to view. See Cross-References for links to individual datasets, which can be downloaded in raster GeoTIFF (.tif) format.