API Crude Oil Stock Change in the United States decreased to -4.60 BBL/1Million in March 21 from 4.59 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States API Crude Oil Stock Change- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

API Gasoline Stocks in the United States decreased to 0.58 BBL/1Million in January 26 from 7.18 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States Api Gasoline Stocks- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Data on crude oil reserves and production; refining and processing; imports, exports, movements; stocks; prices; and consumption/sales are available in machine-readable format. Users of the EIA API are required to obtain an API Key via this registration form: http://www.eia.gov/beta/api/register.cfm

With the reduction of large oil spills because of stricter regulations and safety measures, the question of how to manage smaller oil spills arises. Few on-site analytical tools are available for first responders or other law enforcement personnel to rapidly test for crude oil in the early management of localized polluted areas. The approach reported here relies on well-described computer-assisted multivariate data analysis of the intrinsic fluorescence fingerprints of crude oils to build a multivariate model for the rapid classification of crude oils and the prediction of their properties. Thanks to a dedicated robust portable reader, the method allowed classification and accurate prediction of various properties of crude oil samples like density (according to API, the American Petroleum Institute and viscosity as well as composition parameters such as volume fractions of paraffins or aromatics. In this way, autonomous operation in on-site or in-the-field applications becomes possible based on the direct (undiluted and untreated) measurement of samples and a rapid, tablet-operated readout system to yield a robust and simple analytical test with superior performance. Testing in real-life scenarios allowed the successful classification and prediction of a number of oil spill samples as well as weathered samples that closely resemble samples collected by first responders.

API Distillate Stocks in the United States increased to 3.20 BBL/1Million in January 3 from -1.70 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States API Distillate Stocks Change- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

API Cushing Number in the United States increased to 1.83 BBL/1Million in February 23 from 0.67 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States Api Cushing Number- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

As per Cognitive Market Research's latest published report, the Global API Pipe market size will be $1,139.22 Million by 2028. API Pipe Industry's Compound Annual Growth Rate will be 4.62% from 2023 to 2030.

The Europe API Pipe market size is expected to USD 311.35 Million by 2028.

Factors Affecting API Pipe market growth

The growing demand for steel pipes for onshore, offshore and sour services

From the drilling and completion of exploration and production wells to the transportation to refineries as well as in distribution networks carrying hydrocarbon fluids and natural gas, Steel pipe is an integral part of each stage in the oil and gas industry. The situation in which oil and gas companies operate today have become increasingly complex in the quest to find and exploit new reserves, placing extraordinary demands on pipe manufacturers and service providers. Increasing exploration and production (E&P) investment, onshore and offshore drilling activities, offshore construction are the major factors driving the demand of pipes in oil and gas industry.

The oil and gas industry widely operate in demanding environments that sees machinery working in very high or low temperatures in potential toxic substances. Because of this, special grades of metal have been developed to ensure that it can resist corrosion and withstand extreme temperatures. High strength, good corrosion resistance, higher tensile and yield strength and good weldability are the benefits of using steel pipe in oil and gas industries. Due to this property, steel pipes are majorly used in onshore, offshore activities.

It is very important to maintain the quality of material use in pipeline because many crucial offshore activities such as drilling relies on onshore pipelines, waste disposal facilities, ports and refineries that endanger public health by polluting the air and water, and threaten wildlife and ecosystems.

To avoid the damage of leaks or oil spilling it is important to choose high grade steel pipeline. The American Petroleum Institute (API) drive the standardization and quality among the oil and gas companies. End-User Operational Safety, Protecting and Maintaining Well Integrity, Environmental and Public Safety, Reduced Downtime are the many benefits offered under API standardization.

Restraints for API Pipe Market

Fluctuating raw material prices (Access Detailed Analysis in the Full Report Version)

Opportunities for API Pipe Market

Rising automation in oil & gas industries to encourage growth (Access Detailed Analysis in the Full Report Version)

What is an API Pipe?

API is an American Petroleum Institute safety standard founded in 1919, dedicated to oil and gas operations and procedures. API has developed more than 700 standards to enhance operational safety, environmental protection, and sustainability across the industry, especially through these standards being adopted globally. API standards help to improve operational excellence, ensure compliance and safe practices and reduce the risks in equipment failure. API Line Pipe is a steel pipe majorly used for the transmission of Oil, Gas and Petroleum Distillates. API Pipes are manufactured as per specifications established by American Petroleum Institute (API). It defines the standard for the dimension, physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of the steel.

Global API pipe market is distributed in two type segment including Hot Roll, Cold Roll, and Cold Drawn. These types are categories by the different production process of stainless-steel pipes. Transport of Oil and Transport Gas are the two major applications served by the API pipe.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 200 samples of produced water from 182 sites in 25 oil fields in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, southern California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 152 wells. Well depth and (or) perforation depths are available for 114 of these wells. Sample depths are available for two additional wells in lieu of well or perforation depths. Additional sample sites include four storage tanks, and two unidentifiable sample sources. One of the storage tank samples (Dataset ID 57) is associated with a single identifiable well. Historical samples from other storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources may also represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. Historical sample descriptions provide further insight about the site type associated with some of the samples. Twenty-four sites, including 21 wells, are classified as "injectate" based on the sample description combined with the designated well use at the time of sample collection (WD, water disposal or WF, water flood). Historical samples associated with these sites may represent water that originated from sources other than the wells from which they were collected. For example, samples collected from two wells (Dataset IDs 86 and 98) include as part of their description “blended and treated produced water from across the field”. Historical samples described as formation water (45 samples), including 38 wells with a well type designation of OG (oil/gas), are probably produced water, representing a mixture of formation water and water injected for enhanced recovery. A possible exception may be samples collected from OG wells prior to the onset of production. Historical samples from four wells, including three with a sample description of "formation water", were from wells identified as water source wells which access groundwater for use in the production of oil. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site _location, basic construction information, and American petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate) of the sample; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, and trace elements, parameter code and (or) method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

This dataset evaluates the sandstone-hosted uranium potential of Alberta. An Alberta Geological Survey database of oil and gas well logs were queried to identify wells with gamma values greater than 300 API (American Petroleum Institute units). An algorithm written for this analysis queried more than 48 000 gamma ray logs from more than 22 000 wells. Of those, 11 476 readings greater than 300 API, within the upper 500 metres, were found in 6176 wells. We selected 1318 wells, verified the anomaly and determined rock types using a combination of gamma, density and resistivity logs. This dataset is associated with Alberta Geological Survey Open File Report 2009-0012.

The API 6D ball valve market plays a crucial role in various industries, including oil and gas, water treatment, power generation, and chemical manufacturing. As a standardized valve that meets the American Petroleum Institute (API) 6D specifications, these valves are integral for regulating and controlling the flow

There are 487 onshore oil and gas fields in California encompassing 3,392 square miles of aggregated area. The California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) initiated a Regional Monitoring Program (RMP) in July 2015, intended to determine where and to what degree groundwater quality may be at potential risk to contamination related to oil and gas development activities including well stimulation, well integrity issues, produced water ponds, and underground injection. The first step in monitoring groundwater in and near oil and gas fields is to prioritize the 487 fields using consistent statewide analysis of available data that indicate potential risk of groundwater to oil and gas development. There were limited existing data on potential groundwater risk factors available for oil and gas fields across the state. During 2014-2016, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) extracted and compiled data from various sources, including the California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). During 2014-2016, the depth to top of perforated intervals and depth to base of freshwater for oil and gas production wells in California were extracted from well records maintained by the DOGGR. Well records including geophysical logs, well history, well completion reports, and correspondences were viewed on DOGGR's Well Finder website at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/. This digital dataset contains 3,505 records for production wells, of which 2,964 wells have a recorded depth to top of perforated intervals and 1,494 wells have a recorded depth to base of freshwater. Wells were attributed with American Petroleum Institute (API) numbers, oil and gas field, and well location, well status and type, and nearest oil and gas field for wells that plotted outside field boundaries using the DOGGR All Wells geospatial data included in this data release. Wells were attributed with land surface elevations using the California National Elevation Dataset. Due to limited time and resources to analyze well records for the most recent well configuration, wells spatially distributed throughout the state and accounting for about 2 percent of the more than 185,000 production wells (new, active, idle, or plugged well status) were attributed with depth data.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 271 samples of produced water from 143 sites in or near the San Ardo Oil Field in Monterey County, central California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 101 wells; three wells (DataSet_ID 118 ,125, and 130) are located outside of the administrative boundary, but closer to San Ardo (within 3 miles) than any other oil field, and therefore they were included in this dataset. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval of zone produced, are available for 97 of these wells. Additional sample sites include 11 storage tanks, and 31 unidentifiable sample sources. Designated well use and sample descriptions provide further insight about what the samples represent. The well use designation of most of the wells (79) is OG (oil/gas) and the samples (188) associated with these wells represent produced water. Samples from two wells (Dataset ID 28 and 130) are described as formation water. One well (Dataset ID 30) was drilled as a water-source well (WS) and used to supply groundwater in support of oil production at the time it was sampled, but later converted to an injection well. Another well (Dataset ID 103) was originally drilled as an oil well, but later abandoned and converted to an irrigation well prior to sampling. Eighteen wells have a site type designation of "injectate" based on the sample description combined with the designated well use at the time of sample collection (SF, steam flood; WD, water disposal; or WF, water flood). Most of the historical samples associated with injectate sites may represent water that originated from sources other than the wells at which they were collected. However, samples from two of these wells (Dataset ID 16 and 76) likely represent produced water as they were sampled prior to the wells being used for injection. Limited information is available about historical samples from storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources, but these may represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site location, basic construction information, and American petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate) of the sample; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, and trace elements, parameter code and (or) method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 89 samples of produced water from 84 sites in the Santa Maria Valley Oil Field in Santa Barbara County, California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. Additionally, 3 samples from 3 sites that represent source water used in support of oil production were included in this dataset, for a total of 92 samples and 87 sites, respectively. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 27 wells, 2 reservoirs, 10 storage tanks, and 49 unidentifiable sample sources. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval of zone produced, are available for 25 of the 27 wells. Designated well use and sample descriptions provide further insight about what the samples represent. The well use designation for 23 of the wells is OG (oil/gas). The 27 samples associated with these wells likely represent produced water based on well designation and history. One of the 27 samples is a composite from two wells represented by Dataset ID 46. Three wells have a site type designation of "injectate" based on the current designated well use (WD, water disposal; or WF, water flood). The samples associated with these sites are of unknown origin, but likely represent produced water from OG wells in the Santa Maria Valley Oil Field. The two reservoir samples (Dataset_ID 53 and 54) are freshwater sources that were used in support of oil production, including one reservoir (Dataset_ID 54) described as supplied by groundwater wells. Limited information is available about historical samples from storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources. These samples may represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from the following sources: scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) Underground Injection Control (UIC) program, analytical reports located within well history files in CalGEM's online Well Finder (WF) database, analytical reports available as PDFs (Portable Document Format) documents located on the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker (SWRCB-GT) website, and data compiled by the USGS for the National Produced Water Geochemical Database (USGS PWDB). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination of the sample (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate), specific sample dates for each site, and an inventory of which constituent groups were sampled on each date; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, trace elements, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons, and organic acids. Ion (charge) balance calculations and percent error of these calculations were included for samples having a complete suite of major ion analyses. Analytical method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes were included where available or pertinent. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

This digital dataset represents historical geochemical and other information for 58 sample results of produced water from 56 sites in the Orcutt and Oxnard oil fields in Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties, respectively, in southern California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples were collected include 20 wells (12 in the Oxnard oil field and 8 in the Orcutt oil field). The top and bottom perforations are known for all except one (Dataset ID 33) of these wells. Additional sample sites include 13 storage tanks, and 13 unidentifiable sources. Two of the storage tanks (Dataset IDs 8 and 54), are associated with one and two identifiable wells, respectively. Historical samples from other storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources may also represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. Historical sample descriptions provide further insight about the site type associated with several of the samples. Eleven sites, including one well (Dataset ID 30), are classified as "injectate" based on the sample description combined with the designated well use at the time of sample collection (WD, water disposal). Two samples collected from wells in Orcutt (Dataset IDs 4 and 7), both oil wells with known perforation intervals, and one sample from an unidentified site (Dataset ID 56) are described as zone or formation samples. Three other samples collected from two wells (Dataset ID’s 46 and 49) in Oxnard were identified as water source wells which access groundwater for use in the production of oil. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate) of the sample; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, and trace elements, parameter code and (or) method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

This dataset contains geochemical and other information for 40 historical samples of produced water from the North Coles Levee Oil Field. Three of these samples are from commingled tanks containing produced water from multiple wells as noted in the “Remarks” column. Water that is produced as a byproduct of oil production is called produced water. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The data were transferred manually into a numerical dataset and organized by specific produced water chemical characteristics. Each sample is identified by its API (American Petroleum Institute) number, latitude and longitude, well name, formation name, perforation interval, and date tested. The geochemical analyses include major ions, some minor ions, total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, specific gravity, resistivity, electrical conductivity, and charge balance. The collection and analysis methods and circumstances under which the historical samples were collected cannot be fully known. The intent is to use these historical data in grouped analysis including many sample results, rather than detailed interpretation of each individual sample. Caution should be used in basing interpretations of the data on single sample results.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 481 samples of produced water (PW) from 408 sites in the Edison, Mountain View, and Ant Hill Oil Fields in Kern County, California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 199 wells, 67 sumps, 43 storage tanks (not associated with a specific well), and 104 unidentifiable sample sources which could not be classified because of insufficient information. The wells include 176 sites identifiable by an API (American Petroleum Institute) number and 23 sites for which an API designation could not be found, but which based on the water chemistry data source, site name, sample description, or other ancillary information have been classified as wells. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports a ...

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Automotive Engine Oil market size is projected to reach USD XX million by 2024 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of XX% from 2024 to 2031.

The global Automotive Engine Oil market is anticipated to grow significantly, with a projected CAGR of XX% between 2024 and 2031.
North America held the major market share of more than XX% with a market size of USD XX million in 2024 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2024 to 2031, driven by the stringent emission norms and high vehicle production rates.
The passenger cars segment held the highest Automotive Engine Oil market revenue share in 2024, attributed to the increasing passenger car sales and the rising demand for advanced lubricants for better engine performance and efficiency.

Market Dynamics - Key Drivers of the Automotive Engine Oil Market

Increasing Vehicle Production and Sales to Fuel Market Growth of the Automotive Engine Oil Market

The Automotive Engine Oil market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing production and sales of vehicles globally. The rising automotive manufacturing, particularly in emerging economies, necessitates high-quality engine oils to ensure optimal vehicle performance and engine longevity. The relationship between the two industries is summed by the following statement by the Natural Resources Defence Council, “If automakers had not increased incentives for fuel-inefficient SUVs and pickups, the shift would have been more pronounced.”

For instance, the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA) in their "World Motor Vehicle Production" report highlights a steady increase in global vehicle production, emphasizing the critical role of automotive lubricants in the industry. This trend underlines the growing demand for engine oils, contributing to the expansion of the market.

Technological Advancements in Engine Oil Formulations Enhancing Market Prospects of the Automotive Engine Oil Market

Advancements in engine oil technology, such as the development of synthetic and semi-synthetic oils, offer superior performance characteristics, including enhanced engine protection, improved fuel efficiency, and extended oil change intervals. These innovations cater to the evolving requirements of modern engines, thereby bolstering market growth.

A study by the American Petroleum Institute (API) on "Motor Oil Standards" underscores the importance of continuous innovation in lubricant formulations to meet the stringent performance and environmental standards, supporting the market's upward trajectory.

Market Dynamics - Key Restraints of the Automotive Engine Oil Market

Stringent Environmental Regulations Posing Challenges to the Automotive Engine Oil Market

Stringent environmental regulations regarding emissions and fuel economy standards pose challenges to the Automotive Engine Oil market. The shift towards electric vehicles (EVs) and the emphasis on reducing carbon footprint compel oil manufacturers to adapt their products to align with sustainable practices, potentially restricting market growth.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their "Vehicle Emissions Standards" report outlines the regulatory framework aimed at reducing vehicular emissions, highlighting the impact of these regulations on the automotive lubricants sector and necessitating innovations to comply with environmental standards.

Impact of COVID-19 on the Automotive Engine Oil Market

The COVID-19 pandemic initially disrupted the Automotive Engine Oil market due to supply chain interruptions, manufacturing halts, and reduced vehicle usage during lockdowns. However, the market is showing signs of recovery as the automotive sector adapts to the new normal with an accelerated shift towards online sales channels and contactless services.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) in their "Global Energy Review" discusses the impact of the pandemic on the automotive and oil industries, noting the resilience and adaptability of the market in response to unprecedented challenges. The report suggests a gradual recovery, fuelled by the resurgence in vehicle sales and the adoption of digital platforms for automotive services. Introduction of the Automotive Engine Oil Market

Automotive Engine Oil is crucial for the optimal functioning of vehicle engines, offering ...

This data set contains links to the Gulf of America Region Oil and Gas Operations Report (OGOR-A) Production by Units (1980-Present).

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 45 samples of produced water from 38 sites in the Placerita and Newhall Oil Fields in Los Angeles County, southern California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 17 wells, 6 storage tanks, and 15 unidentifiable sample sources. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval of zone produced, are available for all 17 wells. Designated well use and sample descriptions provide further insight about what the samples represent. The well use designation for 13 of the wells is OG (oil/gas). The samples (16) associated with these wells likely represent produced water based on well designation and history, although samples from two wells (Dataset ID 23 and 32) are described as formation water. Four wells have a site type designation of "injectate" based on the current designated well use (INJ, injection; or WD, water disposal), but samples from two of the four wells (Dataset ID 31 and 35) likely represent produced or formation water as well history records indicate that sample collection predated conversion to (Dataset ID 31) or the commencement of (Dataset ID 35) use for water disposal. Limited information is available about historical samples from storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources. These samples may represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from the following sources: scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) Underground Injection Control (UIC) program, analytical reports located within well history files in CalGEM's online Well Finder (WF) database, analytical reports available as PDFs (Portable Document Format) documents located on the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker (SWRCB-GT) website, and data compiled by the USGS for the National Produced Water Geochemical Database (USGS PWDB). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site _location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination of the sample (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate), specific sample dates for each site, and an inventory of which constituent groups were sampled on each date; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, trace elements, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), tracers, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons, and organic acids. Ion (charge) balance calculations and percent error of these calculations were included for samples having a complete suite of major ion analyses. Analytical method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes were included where available or pertinent. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.