API Crude Oil Stock Change in the United States decreased to -2.48 BBL/1Million in November 28 from -1.90 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States API Crude Oil Stock Change- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Access the American Petroleum Institute's (API) Weekly Statistical Bulletin (WSB), providing essential data for the US and regional petroleum markets.

API Gasoline Stocks in the United States increased to 1.90 BBL/1Million in July 11 from -2.20 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States Api Gasoline Stocks- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 200 samples of produced water from 182 sites in 25 oil fields in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, southern California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 152 wells. Well depth and (or) perforation depths are available for 114 of these wells. Sample depths are available for two additional wells in lieu of well or perforation depths. Additional sample sites include four storage tanks, and two unidentifiable sample sources. One of the storage tank samples (Dataset ID 57) is associated with a single identifiable well. Historical samples from other storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources may also represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. Historical sample descriptions provide further insight about the site type associated with some of the samples. Twenty-four sites, including 21 wells, are classified as "injectate" based on the sample description combined with the designated well use at the time of sample collection (WD, water disposal or WF, water flood). Historical samples associated with these sites may represent water that originated from sources other than the wells from which they were collected. For example, samples collected from two wells (Dataset IDs 86 and 98) include as part of their description “blended and treated produced water from across the field”. Historical samples described as formation water (45 samples), including 38 wells with a well type designation of OG (oil/gas), are probably produced water, representing a mixture of formation water and water injected for enhanced recovery. A possible exception may be samples collected from OG wells prior to the onset of production. Historical samples from four wells, including three with a sample description of "formation water", were from wells identified as water source wells which access groundwater for use in the production of oil. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site location, basic construction information, and American petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate) of the sample; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, and trace elements, parameter code and (or) method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

This digital dataset represents historical geochemical and other information for 58 sample results of produced water from 56 sites in the Orcutt and Oxnard oil fields in Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties, respectively, in southern California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples were collected include 20 wells (12 in the Oxnard oil field and 8 in the Orcutt oil field). The top and bottom perforations are known for all except one (Dataset ID 33) of these wells. Additional sample sites include 13 storage tanks, and 13 unidentifiable sources. Two of the storage tanks (Dataset IDs 8 and 54), are associated with one and two identifiable wells, respectively. Historical samples from other storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources may also represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. Historical sample descriptions provide further insight about the site type associated with several of the samples. Eleven sites, including one well (Dataset ID 30), are classified as "injectate" based on the sample description combined with the designated well use at the time of sample collection (WD, water disposal). Two samples collected from wells in Orcutt (Dataset IDs 4 and 7), both oil wells with known perforation intervals, and one sample from an unidentified site (Dataset ID 56) are described as zone or formation samples. Three other samples collected from two wells (Dataset ID’s 46 and 49) in Oxnard were identified as water source wells which access groundwater for use in the production of oil. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate) of the sample; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, and trace elements, parameter code and (or) method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

Positive Material Identification Services for Oil and Gas Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the Positive Material Identification (PMI) Services for Oil and Gas market size reached USD 1.27 billion in 2024, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.8% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is forecasted to attain a value of USD 2.23 billion. The primary growth factor driving this market is the increasing regulatory emphasis on safety and quality assurance in the oil and gas sector, which necessitates reliable material verification and traceability across the supply chain.

The growth trajectory of the Positive Material Identification (PMI) Services for Oil and Gas market is underpinned by stringent government regulations and industry standards that demand precise material composition verification. Regulatory bodies such as the American Petroleum Institute (API), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and various international agencies have set forth guidelines mandating the use of PMI services to prevent catastrophic failures and ensure the integrity of assets. As oil and gas operations become more complex, the risk of using substandard or counterfeit materials escalates, making PMI an indispensable quality control tool. Additionally, heightened awareness about the consequences of material mix-ups, such as leaks, explosions, and environmental disasters, is pushing companies to invest in advanced PMI services to safeguard their operations and reputation.

Another significant growth driver is the technological advancement in PMI techniques, such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), optical emission spectroscopy (OES), and the proliferation of portable/handheld analyzers. These innovations have drastically improved the speed, accuracy, and convenience of material identification, allowing for real-time, non-destructive testing in challenging environments. The oil and gas industry, characterized by remote and hazardous locations, benefits immensely from these portable solutions, which minimize downtime and operational disruptions. Furthermore, the integration of digital technologies, such as cloud-based data management and IoT-enabled devices, has enhanced the traceability and documentation of PMI results, aligning with the industry’s digital transformation initiatives.

The ongoing expansion of oil and gas infrastructure, particularly in emerging markets, is also fueling demand for PMI services. As new pipelines, refineries, and petrochemical plants are constructed, the need for rigorous material verification becomes critical to ensure compliance with international standards and to protect investments. The increasing trend of asset life extension and maintenance in mature fields is another factor boosting market growth, as operators seek to verify the integrity of aging assets through regular PMI inspections. This confluence of regulatory, technological, and operational factors is expected to sustain the market’s upward momentum over the forecast period.

Regionally, the market outlook is shaped by the concentration of oil and gas activities, regulatory frameworks, and the pace of technological adoption. North America, led by the United States, remains a dominant market owing to its extensive pipeline network, stringent safety standards, and early adoption of advanced PMI technologies. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing rapid growth, driven by expanding refining and petrochemical capacities in China, India, and Southeast Asia. Meanwhile, the Middle East & Africa continues to invest in upstream and midstream infrastructure, creating new opportunities for PMI service providers. Europe, with its focus on asset integrity and environmental compliance, also represents a significant market share, particularly in the downstream segment. Latin America, though smaller in scale, is gradually embracing PMI services as oil and gas investments increase.

Technique Analysis

The Positive Material Identification (PMI) Services for Oil

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 271 samples of produced water from 143 sites in or near the San Ardo Oil Field in Monterey County, central California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 101 wells; three wells (DataSet_ID 118 ,125, and 130) are located outside of the administrative boundary, but closer to San Ardo (within 3 miles) than any other oil field, and therefore they were included in this dataset. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval of zone produced, are available for 97 of these wells. Additional sample sites include 11 storage tanks, and 31 unidentifiable sample sources. Designated well use and sample descriptions provide further insight about what the samples represent. The well use designation of most of the wells (79) is OG (oil/gas) and the samples (188) associated with these wells represent produced water. Samples from two wells (Dataset ID 28 and 130) are described as formation water. One well (Dataset ID 30) was drilled as a water-source well (WS) and used to supply groundwater in support of oil production at the time it was sampled, but later converted to an injection well. Another well (Dataset ID 103) was originally drilled as an oil well, but later abandoned and converted to an irrigation well prior to sampling. Eighteen wells have a site type designation of "injectate" based on the sample description combined with the designated well use at the time of sample collection (SF, steam flood; WD, water disposal; or WF, water flood). Most of the historical samples associated with injectate sites may represent water that originated from sources other than the wells at which they were collected. However, samples from two of these wells (Dataset ID 16 and 76) likely represent produced water as they were sampled prior to the wells being used for injection. Limited information is available about historical samples from storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources, but these may represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site location, basic construction information, and American petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate) of the sample; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, and trace elements, parameter code and (or) method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 89 samples of produced water from 84 sites in the Santa Maria Valley Oil Field in Santa Barbara County, California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. Additionally, 3 samples from 3 sites that represent source water used in support of oil production were included in this dataset, for a total of 92 samples and 87 sites, respectively. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 27 wells, 2 reservoirs, 10 storage tanks, and 49 unidentifiable sample sources. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval of zone produced, are available for 25 of the 27 wells. Designated well use and sample descriptions provide further insight about what the samples represent. The well use designation for 23 of the wells is OG (oil/gas). The 27 samples associated with these wells likely represent produced water based on well designation and history. One of the 27 samples is a composite from two wells represented by Dataset ID 46. Three wells have a site type designation of "injectate" based on the current designated well use (WD, water disposal; or WF, water flood). The samples associated with these sites are of unknown origin, but likely represent produced water from OG wells in the Santa Maria Valley Oil Field. The two reservoir samples (Dataset_ID 53 and 54) are freshwater sources that were used in support of oil production, including one reservoir (Dataset_ID 54) described as supplied by groundwater wells. Limited information is available about historical samples from storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources. These samples may represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from the following sources: scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) Underground Injection Control (UIC) program, analytical reports located within well history files in CalGEM's online Well Finder (WF) database, analytical reports available as PDFs (Portable Document Format) documents located on the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker (SWRCB-GT) website, and data compiled by the USGS for the National Produced Water Geochemical Database (USGS PWDB). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site _location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination of the sample (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate), specific sample dates for each site, and an inventory of which constituent groups were sampled on each date; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, trace elements, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons, and organic acids. Ion (charge) balance calculations and percent error of these calculations were included for samples having a complete suite of major ion analyses. Analytical method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes were included where available or pertinent. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

There are 487 onshore oil and gas fields in California encompassing 3,392 square miles of aggregated area. The California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) initiated a Regional Monitoring Program (RMP) in July 2015, intended to determine where and to what degree groundwater quality may be at potential risk to contamination related to oil and gas development activities including well stimulation, well integrity issues, produced water ponds, and underground injection. The first step in monitoring groundwater in and near oil and gas fields is to prioritize the 487 fields using consistent statewide analysis of available data that indicate potential risk of groundwater to oil and gas development. There were limited existing data on potential groundwater risk factors available for oil and gas fields across the state. During 2014-2016, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) extracted and compiled data from various sources, including the California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). During 2014-2016, the depth to top of perforated intervals and depth to base of freshwater for oil and gas production wells in California were extracted from well records maintained by the DOGGR. Well records including geophysical logs, well history, well completion reports, and correspondences were viewed on DOGGR's Well Finder website at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/. This digital dataset contains 3,505 records for production wells, of which 2,964 wells have a recorded depth to top of perforated intervals and 1,494 wells have a recorded depth to base of freshwater. Wells were attributed with American Petroleum Institute (API) numbers, oil and gas field, and well _location, well status and type, and nearest oil and gas field for wells that plotted outside field boundaries using the DOGGR All Wells geospatial data included in this data release. Wells were attributed with land surface elevations using the California National Elevation Dataset. Due to limited time and resources to analyze well records for the most recent well configuration, wells spatially distributed throughout the state and accounting for about 2 percent of the more than 185,000 production wells (new, active, idle, or plugged well status) were attributed with depth data.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 45 samples of produced water from 38 sites in the Placerita and Newhall Oil Fields in Los Angeles County, southern California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 17 wells, 6 storage tanks, and 15 unidentifiable sample sources. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval of zone produced, are available for all 17 wells. Designated well use and sample descriptions provide further insight about what the samples represent. The well use designation for 13 of the wells is OG (oil/gas). The samples (16) associated with these wells likely represent produced water based on well designation and history, although samples from two wells (Dataset ID 23 and 32) are described as formation water. Four wells have a site type designation of "injectate" based on the current designated well use (INJ, injection; or WD, water disposal), but samples from two of the four wells (Dataset ID 31 and 35) likely represent produced or formation water as well history records indicate that sample collection predated conversion to (Dataset ID 31) or the commencement of (Dataset ID 35) use for water disposal. Limited information is available about historical samples from storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources. These samples may represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from the following sources: scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) Underground Injection Control (UIC) program, analytical reports located within well history files in CalGEM's online Well Finder (WF) database, analytical reports available as PDFs (Portable Document Format) documents located on the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker (SWRCB-GT) website, and data compiled by the USGS for the National Produced Water Geochemical Database (USGS PWDB). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site _location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination of the sample (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate), specific sample dates for each site, and an inventory of which constituent groups were sampled on each date; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, trace elements, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), tracers, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons, and organic acids. Ion (charge) balance calculations and percent error of these calculations were included for samples having a complete suite of major ion analyses. Analytical method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes were included where available or pertinent. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 481 samples of produced water (PW) from 408 sites in the Edison, Mountain View, and Ant Hill Oil Fields in Kern County, California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 199 wells, 67 sumps, 43 storage tanks (not associated with a specific well), and 104 unidentifiable sample sources which could not be classified because of insufficient information. The wells include 176 sites identifiable by an API (American Petroleum Institute) number and 23 sites for which an API designation could not be found, but which based on the water chemistry data source, site name, sample description, or other ancillary information have been classified as wells. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval or zone produced, are available for 177 of these wells. Sites representing sumps and storage tanks were classified in a similar manner as wells based on the water chemistry data source, site name, sample description, or other ancillary information. Numerical water chemistry data were compiled from six data sources: 1) California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) Aquifer Exemptions (AE) Status webpage analytical reports (CalGEM, 2016), 2) CalGEM archived analytical reports (CalGEM, 2021), 3) CalGEM Underground Injection Control (UIC) program hard copies of laboratory analytical reports (CalGEM-UIC, 2017), 4) CalGEM's online Well Finder (WF) database of well history files (CalGEM-WF, 2022), 5) California State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker (SWRCB-GT) online data portal analytical reports (SWRCB-GT, 2022), and 6) three California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) historical reports with water-chemistry data for samples from oil-producing zones of wells (characterized as "formation" water) and wastewater disposal sumps (CDWR/CVRWQCB-E, 1953; CDWR/CVRWQCB-M, 1956; and CDWR/CVRWQCB-A, 1957). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM-WF (2022). The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file (EMA_PW_Summary_Data.xlsx) identifying each site by name, the site _location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination of the sample (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples associated with Site Type labeled as water disposal well), specific sample dates for each site, and an inventory of which constituent groups were sampled on each date; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected constituents (EMA_PW_Geochemistry.xlsx) classified into one of the following groups: water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, trace elements, naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and hydrocarbons. Ion (charge) balance calculations and percent error of these calculations were included for samples having a complete suite of major ion analyses. Analytical method, reporting level, reporting level type, dilution factor, and supplemental notes were included where available or pertinent. A data dictionary (EMA_PW_Data-Dictionary. xlsx) describes the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

API 1164 Compliance Solutions Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the API 1164 Compliance Solutions market size reached USD 1.82 billion globally in 2024, reflecting robust demand driven by increasing regulatory requirements and cybersecurity threats in critical infrastructure sectors. The market is expanding at a CAGR of 11.7% and is forecasted to reach USD 4.75 billion by 2033. This impressive growth is primarily attributed to the heightened focus on pipeline security, the adoption of advanced monitoring technologies, and the ongoing digital transformation across oil & gas and utilities industries.

The surge in demand for API 1164 Compliance Solutions is fundamentally propelled by the rising frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure. With the American Petroleum Institute’s API 1164 standard serving as a benchmark for securing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems and industrial control systems, enterprises are prioritizing investments in compliance solutions. Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are tightening mandates, compelling organizations to adopt comprehensive cybersecurity frameworks. This regulatory landscape, combined with the increasing integration of digital technologies in operational environments, is driving both new deployments and upgrades of compliance systems, ensuring resilience and business continuity.

Another key growth factor is the rapid evolution of technology, particularly the integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and real-time analytics into compliance solutions. These advancements enable proactive threat detection, automated incident response, and continuous monitoring, all of which are critical for maintaining compliance and operational safety. The shift towards cloud-based deployments further accelerates market expansion, offering scalability, cost-effectiveness, and ease of integration with legacy infrastructure. As digital transformation initiatives gain momentum, organizations are increasingly seeking end-to-end compliance solutions that can adapt to evolving threats and regulatory changes, thus fueling sustained market growth.

The expanding footprint of energy and utility infrastructure, especially in emerging economies, is also contributing significantly to the growth of the API 1164 Compliance Solutions market. As new pipelines, remote monitoring stations, and SCADA systems are deployed, the need for robust compliance frameworks intensifies. Organizations are recognizing that non-compliance can result in severe financial penalties, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Consequently, there is a growing trend towards holistic, integrated solutions that encompass software, hardware, and services, ensuring comprehensive coverage across all critical assets. This trend is particularly pronounced among large enterprises, which are leading the way in adopting advanced compliance architectures.

Regionally, North America dominates the market, accounting for over 41% of global revenue in 2024, driven by stringent regulatory enforcement and high penetration of digital control systems in oil & gas and utilities sectors. Europe follows closely, with increasing investments in critical infrastructure security and compliance modernization. The Asia Pacific region is poised for the fastest growth, with a projected CAGR of 14.2% through 2033, as countries like China, India, and Australia ramp up infrastructure development and cybersecurity initiatives. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing steady growth, supported by regulatory reforms and the expansion of energy networks.

Component Analysis

The component segment of the API 1164 Compliance Solutions market is broadly categorized into software, hardware, and services, each playing a distinct role in enabling organizations to achieve and maintain compliance. Software solutions form the backbone of compliance architectures, offering functionalities such as real-time monitoring, automated threat detection, incident management, and reporting. These platforms are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning to enhance predictive analytics and streamline compliance workflows. As regulations evolve, software vendors are focusing on modular, scalable solutions that can be easily updated to address new requirements, ens

Refinery Inspection Services Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global refinery inspection services market size reached USD 4.2 billion in 2024, with a robust growth trajectory driven by stringent safety regulations and the increasing complexity of refinery operations. The market is expanding at a CAGR of 6.1% and is forecasted to attain USD 7.1 billion by 2033. The primary growth factor fueling this surge is the rising emphasis on operational safety, asset integrity, and the need for compliance with evolving environmental standards across the oil & gas, petrochemical, and chemical sectors worldwide.

One of the principal growth drivers for the refinery inspection services market is the ongoing modernization and expansion of refineries globally. As refineries strive to optimize their operations, reduce downtime, and extend asset life, the demand for advanced inspection services such as non-destructive testing, corrosion monitoring, and risk-based inspection is surging. The integration of cutting-edge technologies—including drones, robotics, and digital twins—has further enhanced the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of inspection processes. These technological advancements are not only minimizing human intervention in hazardous environments but also enabling predictive maintenance, which significantly reduces operational costs and unplanned shutdowns. Consequently, refinery operators are increasingly investing in comprehensive inspection programs to ensure uninterrupted production and regulatory compliance.

Additionally, the tightening of health, safety, and environmental regulations by governmental and international agencies has compelled refineries to adopt rigorous inspection protocols. Regulatory bodies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the American Petroleum Institute (API), and regional equivalents have established stringent guidelines for periodic inspections, risk assessments, and integrity management. Non-compliance can result in hefty penalties, environmental hazards, and reputational damage. This regulatory landscape has created a sustained demand for specialized inspection services, driving market growth across developed and emerging economies alike. Moreover, as the global energy mix shifts and refineries process more complex and varied feedstocks, the need for customized inspection solutions tailored to specific operational challenges is becoming increasingly apparent.

The market is also benefiting from the growing focus on sustainability and the transition towards cleaner energy sources. Refineries are under pressure to reduce emissions, manage aging infrastructure, and improve energy efficiency. Inspection services play a crucial role in identifying corrosion, leaks, and structural weaknesses that could compromise environmental performance. Furthermore, digital transformation initiatives are enabling real-time monitoring and data-driven decision-making, enhancing the value proposition of inspection services. As a result, service providers are expanding their offerings to include remote inspections, predictive analytics, and integrated asset management solutions, catering to the evolving needs of refinery operators in a rapidly changing energy landscape.

From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the refinery inspection services market, accounting for approximately 34% of the global revenue in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the presence of a large number of refineries, stringent regulatory frameworks, and early adoption of advanced inspection technologies. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, driven by rapid industrialization, significant investments in refinery capacity expansion, and increasing awareness of safety and environmental issues. Europe maintains a strong position due to its focus on sustainability and modernization of aging infrastructure, while Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are witnessing steady growth supported by ongoing oil & gas projects and rising regulatory scrutiny.

Service Type Analysis

The service type segment in the refinery inspection services market is segmented into visual inspection, non-destructive testing (NDT), corrosion monitoring, risk-based inspection (RBI), and other specialized services. Visual inspection remains a foundational element, providing a first line of defense against visible anomalies such as cracks, leaks, and surface corrosion. However, its limitations in de

Snapshot img

The automated oil tank cleaning system market in EMEA share is expected to increase by USD 33.01 bn from 2020 to 2025, and the market’s growth momentum will accelerate at a CAGR of 4.59%.

This automated oil tank cleaning system market in EMEA research report provides valuable insights on the post COVID-19 impact on the market, which will help companies evaluate their business approaches. Furthermore, this report extensively covers the automated oil tank cleaning system market in EMEA segmentation by type (solutions and services), application (downstream, midstream, and upstream), and geography (Middle East and Africa). The automated oil tank cleaning system market in EMEA report also offers information on several market vendors, including Alfa Laval AB, ARKOIL Technologies Nederland BV, Butterworth Inc., Grupo Tradebe Medioambiente SL, KMT International Inc., Orbijet Inc., Oreco AS, Scanjet Systems AB, Schlumberger Ltd., and VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT SA among others.

What will the Automated Oil Tank Cleaning System Market In EMEA Size be During the Forecast Period?

Download the Free Report Sample to Unlock the Automated Oil Tank Cleaning System Market in EMEA Size for the Forecast Period and Other Important Statistics

Automated Oil Tank Cleaning System Market In EMEA: Key Drivers, Trends, and Challenges

The increasing extraction of low-grade crude that accumulates more sludge is notably driving the automated oil tank cleaning system market in EMEA growth, although factors such as increasing demand for crude oil in Asia may impede the market growth. Our research analysts have studied the historical data and deduced the key market drivers and the COVID-19 pandemic impact on the automated oil tank cleaning system market in the EMEA industry. The holistic analysis of the drivers will help in deducing end goals and refining marketing strategies to gain a competitive edge.

Key Automated Oil Tank Cleaning System Market In EMEA Driver

Increasing extraction of low-grade crude that accumulates more sludge is a major driver fueling the automated oil tank cleaning system market growth in EMEA. Increasing domestic demand and decreasing accessibility to high-grade crude oil have compelled the producing countries to extract heavy oil that was once considered uneconomical. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman have low-grade crude resources and are putting efforts to convert them into monetary profits. A few heavy oil-producing fields in the Middle East are as follows: Mukhaizna field in Oman extracts oil up to 120,000 barrels/day, with enhanced oil recovery methodsRatqa oil field produces 60,000 barrels/day with primary oil recovery methodsManifa oilfield in Saudi Arabia produces 900,000 barrels/day with primary recovery methods. Increased technological innovations, such as cracking and high-temperature distillation that can produce refined products from heavy products, have increased the viability of heavy crude oil. The characteristics of heavy crude oil are such that a lot of sludge gets accumulated at the base of oil tankers carrying this crude oil. The heavy crude oil is highly viscous, thicker, and has more contaminants compared with high American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity crude oil. It is expected that, as crude oil prices will increase by the end of 2021 and crude oil demand is increasing, more investments will be made in the extraction and transportation of heavy crude. Owing to these factors, there will be more demand for oil tankers, driving the demand for automated oil tank cleaning systems over the forecast period in the region.

Key Automated Oil Tank Cleaning System Market In EMEA Trend

The Increasing market for tank cleaning systems as a service is a major trend influencing the automated oil tank cleaning system market growth in EMEA. Automated oil tank cleaning systems that not only clean the tank from the inside but also extract hydrocarbons from the sludge have high upfront costs. As a crude oil tank is usually cleaned over a period of 7 to 10 years, there exists an emerging trend of oil and gas players preferring to outsource the cleaning and extraction processes to service providers in the market. Automated oil tank cleaning systems service providers provide automated oil tank cleaning systems that clean the tanks upstream, midstream, and downstream on a contract basis. Service providers are responsible for carrying out operations starting from tank mobilization to taking away the components. Automated oil tank cleaning system manufacturers are also approaching the end-users through their own service teams or through these service providers. Since 2014, as the oil and gas industry has been on a declining trend in terms of net revenues, end-users are largely looking for a service market instead of purchasing the equipment to cope with operational expenditures. Over the forecast period, it is expected that a majority of the end-users will

Terminal API 2350 Overfill Compliance Audits Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the Terminal API 2350 Overfill Compliance Audits market size reached USD 1.13 billion in 2024, reflecting a robust industry focus on safety and regulatory adherence. The market is demonstrating a healthy growth trajectory, with a recorded CAGR of 7.9% from 2025 to 2033. By 2033, the global market size is forecasted to reach USD 2.24 billion. This growth is primarily driven by heightened regulatory scrutiny, increasing incidents of overfill-related hazards, and the expanding adoption of advanced audit services across oil, gas, and chemical storage sectors worldwide.

A major growth factor for the Terminal API 2350 Overfill Compliance Audits market is the intensification of regulatory enforcement globally. Regulatory bodies such as the American Petroleum Institute (API), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and various regional safety authorities are mandating stricter compliance with API 2350 standards to mitigate overfill incidents. This has resulted in a surge in demand for comprehensive compliance audits, as terminal operators and storage facility owners seek to avoid hefty penalties, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. The proliferation of new and updated regulations, especially in North America and Europe, is compelling both established and emerging market players to invest heavily in specialized audit services, thereby driving the overall market growth.

Technological advancements are another key driver catalyzing the expansion of the Terminal API 2350 Overfill Compliance Audits market. The integration of digital tools such as remote monitoring, IoT-enabled sensors, and advanced data analytics is revolutionizing the audit process, making it more efficient, accurate, and cost-effective. These innovations allow for real-time data collection and analysis, enabling auditors to identify compliance gaps and potential hazards with greater precision. As terminal operators increasingly embrace digital transformation, the demand for technologically advanced audit solutions is expected to rise sharply, further propelling market growth over the forecast period.

The market is also benefitting from the growing awareness of operational risks and the financial repercussions associated with overfill incidents. High-profile accidents in recent years have underscored the critical importance of preventive measures, including regular compliance audits. Companies are now prioritizing risk management and operational safety, allocating higher budgets for audit services, employee training, and consultation. This shift in corporate culture, combined with insurance requirements and stakeholder expectations, is fueling the adoption of API 2350 compliance audits across a broader spectrum of end-users, including independent terminal operators, oil companies, and chemical manufacturers.

From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Terminal API 2350 Overfill Compliance Audits market, accounting for over 37% of the global market share in 2024. This is attributed to the region’s stringent regulatory environment, high concentration of oil and chemical storage infrastructure, and early adoption of advanced compliance technologies. Europe follows closely, driven by robust safety mandates and increasing investments in terminal modernization. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, with a CAGR of 9.1%, as industrialization, regulatory reforms, and infrastructure expansion gain momentum in countries like China, India, and Southeast Asia. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also emerging as promising markets, albeit at a more gradual pace, as regulatory frameworks mature and awareness of overfill risks increases.

Service Type Analysis

The Terminal API 2350 Overfill Compliance Audits market is segmented by service type into Onsite Audits, Remote Audits, Documentation Review, and Training & Consulta

API 754 Tiered Incident Metrics Dashboards Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global API 754 Tiered Incident Metrics Dashboards market size reached USD 1.14 billion in 2024, driven by growing regulatory compliance requirements and the increasing adoption of digital safety management solutions across process industries. The market is expected to expand at a CAGR of 10.7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a forecasted value of USD 2.86 billion by 2033. This robust growth is primarily fueled by the rising emphasis on operational safety, process optimization, and the integration of advanced analytics in hazardous industries as per the latest research findings.

One of the most significant growth factors for the API 754 Tiered Incident Metrics Dashboards market is the global shift toward stringent safety regulations and compliance mandates, particularly within the oil & gas, chemical, and petrochemical sectors. The American Petroleum Institute’s (API) 754 standard has become a benchmark for process safety performance indicators, driving organizations to adopt digital dashboards that provide real-time monitoring, tiered incident reporting, and actionable insights. As regulatory bodies increasingly require transparent, auditable, and standardized incident metrics, companies are investing in comprehensive dashboard solutions to ensure compliance, minimize risks, and foster a culture of safety. This regulatory push is further amplified by the need to align with international best practices, which is accelerating the adoption rate of API 754 dashboards worldwide.

Another key driver of market expansion is the rapid digital transformation occurring within industrial operations. The integration of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data analytics into API 754 Tiered Incident Metrics Dashboards is revolutionizing how organizations manage safety incidents and process data. These technologies enable predictive analytics, root cause analysis, and trend identification, empowering companies to proactively address safety concerns and prevent future incidents. Moreover, the increasing use of cloud-based solutions is making these dashboards more accessible, scalable, and cost-effective, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that previously faced barriers due to high capital expenditures. This democratization of technology is broadening the market’s reach and accelerating its growth trajectory.

Additionally, heightened awareness of the financial and reputational impact of industrial incidents is propelling organizations to invest in robust incident management systems. The API 754 Tiered Incident Metrics Dashboards market is benefitting from the growing recognition that a single major safety incident can result in substantial financial losses, legal liabilities, and long-term damage to brand reputation. As a result, companies are prioritizing investments in comprehensive incident tracking, reporting, and analytics platforms that not only enhance safety but also deliver measurable business value. The ability of these dashboards to integrate seamlessly with existing enterprise systems, provide customized reporting, and support continuous improvement initiatives is further enhancing their appeal across various industrial sectors.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the API 754 Tiered Incident Metrics Dashboards market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024. This leadership position is attributed to the presence of major oil & gas and chemical companies, a mature regulatory environment, and early adoption of digital safety solutions. However, the Asia Pacific region is projected to witness the fastest growth over the forecast period, driven by rapid industrialization, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and rising investments in process safety infrastructure. Europe also represents a significant market, characterized by strong environmental standards and a proactive approach to workplace safety. Meanwhile, Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging as promising markets, supported by expanding energy and petrochemical sectors and a growing focus on operational excellence.

API Management for Energy Data Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the Global API Management for Energy Data market size was valued at $2.1 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $7.8 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 15.4% during 2024–2033. One of the primary drivers fueling this robust market growth is the increasing digital transformation across the energy sector, which is pushing utilities, oil & gas companies, and renewable energy providers to adopt advanced API management solutions for seamless data exchange, real-time analytics, and enhanced operational efficiency. As the energy ecosystem becomes more interconnected and data-driven, API management platforms are emerging as critical enablers of secure, scalable, and interoperable data flows, supporting everything from grid optimization to asset management and regulatory compliance.

Regional Outlook

North America currently holds the largest share of the API Management for Energy Data market, accounting for approximately 36% of the global revenue in 2024. This dominance can be attributed to the region’s mature energy infrastructure, early adoption of digital technologies, and strong emphasis on grid modernization initiatives. The United States, in particular, has seen substantial investments in smart grid projects and advanced metering infrastructure, driving the need for robust API management solutions to integrate disparate data sources and enable real-time decision-making. Furthermore, supportive government policies and the presence of leading technology vendors have accelerated the deployment of API platforms, making North America the benchmark for innovation and implementation in this sector.

Asia Pacific is projected to be the fastest-growing region, with a forecasted CAGR of 18.2% from 2024 to 2033. Rapid urbanization, expanding energy demand, and the proliferation of renewable energy projects across countries such as China, India, Japan, and South Korea are major contributors to this growth. Governments in the region are actively promoting smart city initiatives and digital energy management, which require scalable and secure API management frameworks to handle vast and complex data streams. Additionally, the influx of investments from global technology firms and increased collaboration between public and private sectors are fostering an environment conducive to innovation and market expansion in API management for energy data.

Emerging economies in Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing increased adoption of API management solutions, albeit at a more gradual pace due to infrastructural and regulatory challenges. In these regions, the drive toward energy diversification, coupled with the need for improved grid reliability and operational transparency, is prompting utilities and industrial players to explore API-based data integration. However, issues such as limited digital infrastructure, fragmented regulatory frameworks, and a shortage of skilled IT professionals continue to impede widespread deployment. Nevertheless, localized demand for energy efficiency and sustainability, alongside international support for digital transformation projects, is expected to gradually unlock new growth avenues in these markets.

Report Scope

Fuel Gas Booster Compressor Market Outlook

The global fuel gas booster compressor market size in 2023 was valued at approximately USD 3.5 billion and is projected to reach around USD 5.8 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.2% during the forecast period. The market is driven by increasing demand for efficient energy storage and fuel transmission solutions across various industries including oil & gas, power generation, and manufacturing. The need for enhanced fuel gas delivery systems in industrial processes and the growing focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions are some of the pivotal factors propelling market growth.

One of the main growth factors of the fuel gas booster compressor market is the booming oil and gas industry, which requires efficient gas compression solutions to optimize fuel transmission and storage. Rising shale gas exploration activities, especially in North America, have significantly contributed to increased demand for booster compressors. These compressors are essential for maintaining the pressure and flow of natural gas from extraction sites to processing facilities. Furthermore, technological advancements in compressor design and functionality have paved the way for more efficient and reliable operations, thus fuelling market expansion.

Another critical growth factor is the increasing adoption of fuel gas booster compressors in power generation applications. With the global shift towards cleaner energy sources, natural gas has emerged as a preferred fuel due to its lower carbon footprint compared to coal and oil. To ensure consistent and efficient fuel supply to gas turbines used in power plants, high-performance booster compressors are indispensable. As nations worldwide adopt stringent environmental regulations and transition towards sustainable energy solutions, the demand for these compressors is expected to witness substantial growth.

The industrial sector also plays a prominent role in driving the market for fuel gas booster compressors. Industries such as chemicals, manufacturing, and metallurgy rely heavily on these compressors to maintain optimal gas flow and pressure within their operations. Enhanced efficiency, reduced operational costs, and improved safety measures are some of the key benefits fueling their adoption in these sectors. Furthermore, the ongoing trend of industrial automation and the implementation of Industry 4.0 technologies are likely to spur further demand for advanced fuel gas booster compressor solutions in the near future.

The API 11P Reciprocating Compressor is a vital component in the oil and gas industry, known for its robustness and efficiency in handling high-pressure gas applications. These compressors are designed to meet the stringent standards of the American Petroleum Institute (API), ensuring reliability and safety in critical operations. Their ability to compress gas to very high pressures makes them indispensable in processes such as gas lift, enhanced oil recovery, and gas gathering systems. The API 11P Reciprocating Compressor's durability and adaptability to various industrial environments contribute significantly to optimizing fuel transmission and storage, thereby supporting the overall growth of the fuel gas booster compressor market.

Regionally, Asia Pacific is poised to be a significant contributor to market growth, driven by rapid industrialization and urbanization in countries like China and India. The burgeoning energy needs of these nations, coupled with substantial investments in infrastructure development, are likely to boost the demand for fuel gas booster compressors. Additionally, the emphasis on reducing air pollution and switching to cleaner energy sources is expected to further propel market growth in this region. North America and Europe, with their established industrial base and ongoing energy transitions, are also anticipated to demonstrate steady growth during the forecast period.

Type Analysis

The fuel gas booster compressor market is segmented into three main types: reciprocating, rotary, and centrifugal compressors. Reciprocating compressors are widely used due to their high efficiency and ability to handle varying pressure requirements. These compressors use pistons driven by a crankshaft to deliver gases at high pressure, making them suitable for a broad range of applications in the oil & gas and power generation sectors. Reciprocating compressors are particularly favored for th