6 datasets found
  1. Market share of mobile operating systems worldwide 2009-2025, by quarter

    • statista.com
    • abripper.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Market share of mobile operating systems worldwide 2009-2025, by quarter [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272698/global-market-share-held-by-mobile-operating-systems-since-2009/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    Android maintained its position as the leading mobile operating system worldwide in the third quarter of 2025 with a market share of about ***** percent. Android's closest rival, Apple's iOS, had a market share of approximately ***** percent during the same period. The leading mobile operating systems Both unveiled in 2007, Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS have evolved through incremental updates introducing new features and capabilities. The latest version of iOS, iOS 18, was released in September 2024, while the most recent Android iteration, Android 15, was made available in September 2023. A key difference between the two systems concerns hardware - iOS is only available on Apple devices, whereas Android ships with devices from a range of manufacturers such as Samsung, Google and OnePlus. In addition, Apple has had far greater success in bringing its users up to date. As of February 2024, ** percent of iOS users had iOS 17 installed, while in the same month only ** percent of Android users ran the latest version. The rise of the smartphone From around 2010, the touchscreen smartphone revolution had a major impact on sales of basic feature phones, as the sales of smartphones increased from *** million units in 2008 to **** billion units in 2023. In 2020, smartphone sales decreased to **** billion units due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Apple, Samsung, and lately also Xiaomi, were the big winners in this shift towards smartphones, with BlackBerry and Nokia among those unable to capitalize.

  2. smart phone dataset uncleaned

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Apr 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Samer Shaikh (2025). smart phone dataset uncleaned [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/samershaikh/smart-phone-dataset-uncleaned
    Explore at:
    zip(67474 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 22, 2025
    Authors
    Samer Shaikh
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    This dataset contains detailed specifications of 1,020 smartphones, scraped from a mobile comparison website. It includes two versions:

    uncleand.csv — Uncleaned, original scraped data

    cleaned.csv — Cleaned version with structured and formatted entries

    Each entry provides key smartphone attributes such as:

    Name: Brand and model of the phone

    Price: Listed price at the time of data collection

    Spec Score: Overall specification score (if available)

    SIM Info: Type and number of supported SIMs

    Battery: Battery capacity details

    Storage: Internal storage configuration

    Display Info: Screen size and type

    Camera: Rear and front camera specifications

    Processor: CPU details

    Memory Card Support: Whether expandable storage is supported

    OS: Operating system (e.g., Android, iOS)

    This dataset is ideal for practicing:

    Data cleaning & preprocessing

    EDA (Exploratory Data Analysis)

    Feature engineering

    Price prediction models

    Smartphone comparisons & trends

    Whether you're a beginner learning data science or building models around consumer electronics, this dataset is a great starting point.

  3. Summary statistics for GPS quality metrics and incidence of outliers by...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jan 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sarah M. Kwiatek; Liang Cai; Kathleen A. Cagney; William E. Copeland; V. Joseph Hotz; Rick H. Hoyle (2024). Summary statistics for GPS quality metrics and incidence of outliers by participants’ residential and activity space locations. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297492.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Sarah M. Kwiatek; Liang Cai; Kathleen A. Cagney; William E. Copeland; V. Joseph Hotz; Rick H. Hoyle
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Summary statistics for GPS quality metrics and incidence of outliers by participants’ residential and activity space locations.

  4. Comparison between EMA-reported location and GPS-derived location.

    • figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jan 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sarah M. Kwiatek; Liang Cai; Kathleen A. Cagney; William E. Copeland; V. Joseph Hotz; Rick H. Hoyle (2024). Comparison between EMA-reported location and GPS-derived location. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297492.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Sarah M. Kwiatek; Liang Cai; Kathleen A. Cagney; William E. Copeland; V. Joseph Hotz; Rick H. Hoyle
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Comparison between EMA-reported location and GPS-derived location.

  5. A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Tools for Suicide Prevention

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    txt
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mark Erik Larsen; Jennifer Nicholas; Helen Christensen (2023). A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Tools for Suicide Prevention [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152285
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Mark Erik Larsen; Jennifer Nicholas; Helen Christensen
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundSuicide is a leading cause of death globally, and there has been a rapid growth in the use of new technologies such as mobile health applications (apps) to help identify and support those at risk. However, it is not known whether these apps are evidence-based, or indeed contain potentially harmful content. This review examines the concordance of features in publicly available apps with current scientific evidence of effective suicide prevention strategies.MethodsApps referring to suicide or deliberate self-harm (DSH) were identified on the Android and iOS app stores. Systematic review methodology was employed to screen and review app content. App features were labelled using a coding scheme that reflected the broad range of evidence-based medical and population-based suicide prevention interventions. Best-practice for suicide prevention was based upon a World Health Organization report and supplemented by other reviews of the literature.ResultsOne hundred and twenty-three apps referring to suicide were identified and downloaded for full review, 49 of which were found to contain at least one interactive suicide prevention feature. Most apps focused on obtaining support from friends and family (n = 27) and safety planning (n = 14). Of the different suicide prevention strategies contained within the apps, the strongest evidence in the literature was found for facilitating access to crisis support (n = 13). All reviewed apps contained at least one strategy that was broadly consistent with the evidence base or best-practice guidelines. Apps tended to focus on a single suicide prevention strategy (mean = 1.1), although safety plan apps provided the opportunity to provide a greater number of techniques (mean = 3.9). Potentially harmful content, such as listing lethal access to means or encouraging risky behaviour in a crisis, was also identified.DiscussionMany suicide prevention apps are available, some of which provide elements of best practice, but none that provide comprehensive evidence-based support. Apps with potentially harmful content were also identified. Despite the number of apps available, and their varied purposes, there is a clear need to develop useful, pragmatic, and multifaceted mobile resources for this population. Clinicians should be wary in recommending apps, especially as potentially harmful content can be presented as helpful. Currently safety plan apps are the most comprehensive and evidence-informed, for example, “Safety Net” and “MoodTools—Depression Aid”.

  6. Global social media subscriptions comparison 2023

    • statista.com
    • de.statista.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stacy Jo Dixon, Global social media subscriptions comparison 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Stacy Jo Dixon
    Description

    Social media companies are starting to offer users the option to subscribe to their platforms in exchange for monthly fees. Until recently, social media has been predominantly free to use, with tech companies relying on advertising as their main revenue generator. However, advertising revenues have been dropping following the COVID-induced boom. As of July 2023, Meta Verified is the most costly of the subscription services, setting users back almost 15 U.S. dollars per month on iOS or Android. Twitter Blue costs between eight and 11 U.S. dollars per month and ensures users will receive the blue check mark, and have the ability to edit tweets and have NFT profile pictures. Snapchat+, drawing in four million users as of the second quarter of 2023, boasts a Story re-watch function, custom app icons, and a Snapchat+ badge.

  7. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista, Market share of mobile operating systems worldwide 2009-2025, by quarter [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272698/global-market-share-held-by-mobile-operating-systems-since-2009/
Organization logo

Market share of mobile operating systems worldwide 2009-2025, by quarter

Explore at:
428 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

Android maintained its position as the leading mobile operating system worldwide in the third quarter of 2025 with a market share of about ***** percent. Android's closest rival, Apple's iOS, had a market share of approximately ***** percent during the same period. The leading mobile operating systems Both unveiled in 2007, Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS have evolved through incremental updates introducing new features and capabilities. The latest version of iOS, iOS 18, was released in September 2024, while the most recent Android iteration, Android 15, was made available in September 2023. A key difference between the two systems concerns hardware - iOS is only available on Apple devices, whereas Android ships with devices from a range of manufacturers such as Samsung, Google and OnePlus. In addition, Apple has had far greater success in bringing its users up to date. As of February 2024, ** percent of iOS users had iOS 17 installed, while in the same month only ** percent of Android users ran the latest version. The rise of the smartphone From around 2010, the touchscreen smartphone revolution had a major impact on sales of basic feature phones, as the sales of smartphones increased from *** million units in 2008 to **** billion units in 2023. In 2020, smartphone sales decreased to **** billion units due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Apple, Samsung, and lately also Xiaomi, were the big winners in this shift towards smartphones, with BlackBerry and Nokia among those unable to capitalize.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu