Facebook
TwitterThis statistic displays the total number of animals used in scientific research in the European Union from 2015 to 2022, including only animals used for the first time each year. In 2022, some 8.4 million animals were used in scientific research in all EU member states and Norway, an increase of over 400 thousand compared to the previous year.
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic displays the share of animals used in scientific research in the European Union countries in 2019, by severity of use. Most of the animals used in the EU were reported to have undergone mild use. For nine percent of animals the use was classified as severe.
Facebook
TwitterDespite animal testing being a controversial topic for many years, it is still widely used globally to assess the safety of products and test the efficacy of new treatments and products. In 2020, the United States was the world’s largest user of animals in research and testing, with around 20 million animals used research and testing, followed by China where it is estimated that around 16 million animals were used in research and testing in that year. Animal testing is used especially in the medical, cosmetic, and chemical industries.
Animal Testing in the EU
The European Union also reported some 9.4 million animals used research and testing as of 2020. Basic research, and translational and applied research are the two leading purposes of animal testing in the European Union. Mice represent the most commonly used animal in research and testing in the EU, representing almost half of all animals used in research and testing, followed by fish and rats.
Animal Testing in Great Britain
Animal testing in Great Britain was most common in basic scientific research on the nervous system and the immune system, and most procedures on animals for scientific experiments in that year in Great Britain were conducted by universities and medical schools. As in the EU, mice were the most commonly used animals in research and testing, followed by domestic fowl and rats.
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic displays the share of animals used in scientific research in the European Union countries in 2019, by origin (place of birth). Most of the used animals in the EU were born at a registered breeder inside the European Union.
Facebook
TwitterThis document contains the following information: This annual publication contains data on animal experimentation carried out during 2003, subject to the provisions of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.
Under this Act, any scientific procedure carried out on any living vertebrate animal, and one species of octopus, which is likely to cause pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm is a regulated procedure requiring licence authority. The data is structured to comply with EU requirements, although it is far more extensive than required by Europe. In 2003, there were 2.79 million scientific procedures conducted, an increase of 2.2 per cent on the previous year.
Most experiments and tests were conducted on mice, rats and other rodents (85 per cent), with the remainder on birds (four per cent) and fish (six per cent). Dogs, cats, horses and non-human primates (usually macaques and marmosets) combined amounted to less than one per cent of procedures.
Genetically modified animals were used in 27 per cent of cases, an increase of one per cent on 2002 and 19 per cent on 1995). Non-toxicological procedures accounted for 84 per cent of procedures, with the main areas of use being for immunological studies, pharmaceutical research and development, and cancer research.
This paper was laid before Parliament in response to a legislative requirement or as a Return to an Address and was ordered to be printed by the House of Commons.
Facebook
TwitterThis document contains the following information: Statistics of scientific procedures on living animals: Great Britain 2004.
This annual publication contains data on animal experimentation carried out during 2004 subject to the provisions of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Under this Act, any scientific procedure carried out on any living vertebrate animal, and one species of octopus, which is likely to cause pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm, is a regulated procedure requiring licence authority. In 2004, there were 2.85 million scientific procedures conducted, an increase of 2.3 per cent on 2003. Most experiments and tests were conducted on mice, rats and other rodents (85 per cent), with the remainder on birds (four per cent) and fish (seven per cent). Dogs, cats, horses and non-human primates (usually macaques and marmosets) combined, amounted to less than one per cent of procedures. Genetically modified animals were used in 32 per cent of cases, compared with 27 per cent for 2003; most of these were rodents. Non-toxicological procedures accounted for 85 per cent of procedures, with the main areas of use being for immunological studies, pharmaceutical research and development, anatomy and cancer research.
This Command Paper was laid before Parliament by a Government Minister by Command of Her Majesty. Command Papers are considered by the Government to be of interest to Parliament but are not required to be presented by legislation.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2019, 797,546 animals were used for research in research facilities in the United States. This is an increase from the previous year, when about 780,070 animals were used for research in the country.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
Global Animals Used in Research and Testing market size 2025 was XX Million. Animals Used in Research and Testing Industry compound annual growth rate (CAGR) will be XX% from 2025 till 2033.
Facebook
TwitterThis report details information on the regulated scientific procedures involving living animals carried out in the calendar year, including number of procedures, species and genetic status of animals, and purpose and severity of procedures. For more information see the ‘User guide to Home Office statistics of scientific procedures on living animals’.
If you have any queries about this release, please email HOAIStatisticalTransformation@homeoffice.gov.uk.
Facebook
TwitterThis report details information on the regulated scientific procedures involving living animals carried out in the calendar year, including number of procedures, species and genetic status of animals, and purpose and severity of procedures. For more information see the ‘User guide to Home Office statistics of scientific procedures on living animals’.
If you have any queries about this release, please email CSU.statistics@homeoffice.gov.uk.
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic displays the share of purposes for scientific research on animals in the 27 European Union countries (including Norway) in 2019. The main purpose for testing on animals was for basic research, with some 45 percent.
Facebook
TwitterFor more information see the ‘User guide to Home Office statistics of scientific procedures on living animals’.
If you have any queries about this release, please email CSU.statistics@homeoffice.gov.uk.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The graph shows the changes in the impact factor of ^ and its corresponding percentile for the sake of comparison with the entire literature. Impact Factor is the most common scientometric index, which is defined by the number of citations of papers in two preceding years divided by the number of papers published in those years.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The graph shows the changes in the impact factor of ^ and its corresponding percentile for the sake of comparison with the entire literature. Impact Factor is the most common scientometric index, which is defined by the number of citations of papers in two preceding years divided by the number of papers published in those years.
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic displays the number of animals used in scientific research in Ireland in 2023. Mice were the most commonly used animal, accounting for nearly 87 thousand uses, followed by rats at more than eight thousand.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The graph shows the citations of ^'s papers published in each year.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global Animal Health Knowledge Graphs market size in 2024 is valued at USD 1.28 billion, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.2% projected from 2025 to 2033. By 2033, the market is forecasted to reach approximately USD 4.72 billion. The primary growth factor driving this expansion is the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence and data-driven decision-making in veterinary care, livestock management, and pharmaceutical research, which is revolutionizing the animal health industry on a global scale.
The significant growth in the Animal Health Knowledge Graphs market is primarily attributed to the rising awareness of animal health and the increasing complexity of veterinary data. As the volume of data generated from veterinary clinics, livestock farms, diagnostic laboratories, and research institutes continues to surge, the need for advanced knowledge management solutions has become paramount. Knowledge graphs, with their ability to integrate, relate, and contextualize vast datasets, are enabling stakeholders to derive actionable insights and improve outcomes in disease surveillance, drug discovery, and livestock management. Additionally, the growing prevalence of zoonotic diseases and the need for real-time data analysis and sharing across the animal health ecosystem are further accelerating the adoption of knowledge graph technologies.
Furthermore, the market is benefitting from the rapid digital transformation within the animal health sector. The integration of advanced analytics, machine learning, and natural language processing with knowledge graphs is enhancing the ability to predict disease outbreaks, optimize drug development pipelines, and support evidence-based veterinary practices. Pharmaceutical companies and research institutes are increasingly leveraging these technologies to accelerate research and development, streamline regulatory compliance, and improve the efficacy and safety of veterinary medicines. The convergence of big data, cloud computing, and semantic web technologies is creating new opportunities for innovation and collaboration among stakeholders in the animal health value chain.
Another key growth driver is the increasing demand for precision livestock management and improved animal welfare standards. Livestock farmers are adopting knowledge graph solutions to monitor animal health, optimize nutrition and breeding programs, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. These solutions enable real-time tracking of animal health parameters, early detection of diseases, and efficient management of veterinary records. As governments and international organizations continue to emphasize the importance of food safety and biosecurity, the adoption of advanced knowledge management platforms is expected to further accelerate, contributing to the sustained growth of the Animal Health Knowledge Graphs market over the forecast period.
From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the global Animal Health Knowledge Graphs market, driven by the presence of leading technology providers, advanced veterinary infrastructure, and a strong focus on innovation. Europe follows closely, supported by robust government initiatives and a well-established animal health industry. The Asia Pacific region is emerging as a high-growth market, fueled by increasing investments in animal health technology, rising livestock populations, and growing awareness of zoonotic diseases. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing steady growth, supported by improving veterinary care standards and expanding digital infrastructure. Each region presents unique opportunities and challenges, shaping the overall dynamics of the global market.
The Animal Health Knowledge Graphs market is segmented by component into software and services, each playing a critical role in the overall ecosystem. The software segment encompasses platforms and tools designed to enable the creation, visualization, and management of knowledge graphs, often integrating advanced analytics, machine learning, and semantic web technologies. The increasing adoption of cloud-based and AI-powered software solutions is driving this segment’s growth, as stakeholders seek scalable and flexible platforms that can handle large volumes of heterogeneous data. The ability of software solutions to provide real-time insights,
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic displays the number of animals used in scientific research in the European Union (and Norway) in 2022, by class of animal. In that year, around ************ mice were used in scientific research in the EU, while around *** thousand rats were used.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://data.gov.tw/licensehttps://data.gov.tw/license
The provided information includes: year, month, animal species, purpose, vaccine name, code, brand category, brand name, batch number, total dose, expiry date, and judgment field data.
Facebook
TwitterThis publication presents official quarterly statistics on tuberculosis (TB) movement testing in cattle in Great Britain. The different TB movement testing regimes in England, Scotland and Wales reflect regional variations in disease incidence, including the Officially TB Free status of Scotland. The release covers pre-movement testing in England and Wales, and post-movement testing in Scotland, the Low Risk Area of England, annual surveillance testing parts of the Edge area of England, and the Low and Intermediate TB Areas of Wales.
The movement testing statistics are obtained from the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) work management IT support system, which is used for the administration of TB testing in GB. They are a snapshot of the position on the date on which the data were extracted. The information is subject to regular revision until all test results are available.
Next update: see the statistics release calendar
For further information you can contact:
tbstatistics@defra.gov.uk
https://www.x.com/defrastats">X: @DefraStats
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic displays the total number of animals used in scientific research in the European Union from 2015 to 2022, including only animals used for the first time each year. In 2022, some 8.4 million animals were used in scientific research in all EU member states and Norway, an increase of over 400 thousand compared to the previous year.