The National Forest Climate Change Maps project was developed by the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) and the Office of Sustainability and Climate to meet the needs of national forest managers for information on projected climate changes at a scale relevant to decision making processes, including forest plans. The maps use state-of-the-art science and are available for every national forest in the contiguous United States with relevant data coverage. Currently, the map sets include variables related to precipitation, air temperature, snow (including snow residence time and April 1 snow water equivalent), and stream flow.

Historical (1975-2005) and future (2071-2090) precipitation and temperature data for the contiguous United States are ensemble mean values across 20 global climate models from the CMIP5 experiment (https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1), downscaled to a 4 km grid. For more information on the downscaling method and to access the data, please see Abatzoglou and Brown, 2012 (https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/joc.2312) and the Northwest Knowledge Network (https://climate.northwestknowledge.net/MACA/). We used the MACAv2- Metdata monthly dataset; average temperature values were calculated as the mean of monthly minimum and maximum air temperature values (degrees C), averaged over the season of interest (annual, winter, or summer). Absolute change was then calculated between the historical and future time periods.

Raster data are also available for download from RMRS site (https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/NFS-regional-climate-change-maps/categories/us-raster-layers.html), along with pdf maps and detailed metadata (https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/NFS-regional-climate-change-maps/downloads/NationalForestClimateChangeMapsMetadata.pdf).

The North America climate data were derived from WorldClim, a set of global climate layers developed by the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley, USA, in collaboration with The International Center for Tropical Agriculture and Rainforest CRC with support from NatureServe.The global climate data layers were generated through interpolation of average monthly climate data from weather stations across North America. The result is a 30-arc-second-resolution (1-Km) grid of mean temperature values. The North American data were clipped from the global data and reprojected to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area projection. Background information on the WorldClim database is available in: Very High-Resolution Interpolated Climate Surfaces for Global Land Areas; Hijmans, R.J., S.E. Cameron, J.L. Parra, P.G. Jones and A. Jarvis; International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965-1978; 2005.Files Download

The National Forest Climate Change Maps project was developed by the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) and the Office of Sustainability and Climate to meet the needs of national forest managers for information on projected climate changes at a scale relevant to decision making processes, including forest plans. The maps use state-of-the-art science and are available for every national forest in the contiguous United States with relevant data coverage. Currently, the map sets include variables related to precipitation, air temperature, snow (including snow residence time and April 1 snow water equivalent), and stream flow.Historical (1975-2005) and future (2071-2090) precipitation and temperature data for the state of Alaska were developed by the Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning (SNAP) (https://snap.uaf.edu). Monthly precipitation values (mm) were summed over the season of interest (annual, winter, or summer). These datasets have several important differences from the MACAv2-Metdata (https://climate.northwestknowledge.net/MACA/) products, used in the contiguous U.S. They were developed using different global circulation models and different downscaling methods, and were downscaled to a different scale (771 m instead of 4 km). While these cover the same time periods and use broadly similar approaches, caution should be used when directly comparing values between Alaska and the contiguous United States.Raster data are also available for download from RMRS site (https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/NFS-regional-climate-change-maps/categories/us-raster-layers.html), along with pdf maps and detailed metadata (https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/NFS-regional-climate-change-maps/downloads/NationalForestClimateChangeMapsMetadata.pdf).

1km gridded Rainfall map - interpolation over DEM. Rainfall data scattered well except Western and Southern Highlands Provinces. With the Digicel Towers (mounted with rainfall instruments) network nation-wide. The Rainfall Map can be improved.

This map plots the Change in Annual Precipitation if Earth’s long-term average temperature reaches specific levels of warming. These Global Warming Levels (GWLs) correspond to global average temperature increases of 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 °C above pre-industrial levels measured from 1851 to 1900. On the Fahrenheit scale, these warming levels are 2.7, 3.6, 5.4, and 7.2 °F. As of the 2020s, global average temperature has already increased around 2 °F above pre-industrial levels.Each layer of the map is style with the same range of data so that the spatial patterns of change can be compared across all scenarios. The projections are derived from downscaled climate models from LOCA2 and STAR-ESDM, and were used in the 5th National Climate Assessment. Click on the layers below to view more detailed descriptions of how the data was generated. The data used in this map is considered in beta release and will be replaced.

The National Forest Climate Change Maps project was developed by the Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) and the Office of Sustainability and Climate to meet the needs of national forest managers for information on projected climate changes at a scale relevant to decision making processes, including forest plans. The maps use state-of-the-art science and are available for every national forest in the contiguous United States with relevant data coverage. Currently, the map sets include variables related to precipitation, air temperature, snow (including snow residence time and April 1 snow water equivalent), and stream flow.

Historical (1975-2005) and future (2071-2090) precipitation and temperature data for the contiguous United States are ensemble mean values across 20 global climate models from the CMIP5 experiment (https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1), downscaled to a 4 km grid. For more information on the downscaling method and to access the data, please see Abatzoglou and Brown, 2012 (https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/joc.2312) and the Northwest Knowledge Network (https://climate.northwestknowledge.net/MACA/). We used the MACAv2- Metdata monthly dataset; monthly precipitation values (mm) were summed over the season of interest (annual, winter, or summer). Absolute and percent change were then calculated between the historical and future time periods.

Raster data are also available for download from RMRS site (https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/NFS-regional-climate-change-maps/categories/us-raster-layers.html), along with pdf maps and detailed metadata (https://www.fs.usda.gov/rm/boise/AWAE/projects/NFS-regional-climate-change-maps/downloads/NationalForestClimateChangeMapsMetadata.pdf).

Typical annual rainfall data were summarized from monthly precipitation data and provided in millimeters (mm). The monthly climate data for global land areas were generated from a large network of weather stations by the WorldClim project. Precipitation and temperature data were collected from the weather stations and aggregated across a target temporal range of 1970-2000.

Weather station data (between 9,000 and 60,000 stations) were interpolated using thin-plate splines with covariates including elevation, distance to the coast, and MODIS-derived minimum and maximum land surface temperature. Spatial interpolation was first done in 23 regions of varying size depending on station density, instead of the common approach to use a single model for the entire world. The satellite imagery data were most useful in areas with low station density. The interpolation technique allowed WorldClim to produce high spatial resolution (approximately 1 km2) raster data sets.

These data represent mean annual precipitation (in inches) for Idaho for the climatological period 1961-90. Average annual precipitation is the average of the annual amount of precipitation for a location over a year. Data used to delineate these boundaries are from Idaho weather stations (1961-90).Source data for this web service can be downloaded from https://insideidaho.org/data/ago/ics/ppt_id_ics.zip.A printed map is available: https://alliance-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/m1uotc/CP71168920310001451 from the University of Idaho Map Room. Additionally, a related research report is available: https://alliance-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/m1uotc/CP71180601950001451.Related data set: Weather Stations Used to Compile the Mean Annual Precipitation Map for Idaho

Contained within the 3rd Edition (1957) of the Atlas of Canada is a plate that shows two maps for the annual total precipitation. Annual precipitation is defined as the sum of rainfall and the assumed water equivalent of snowfall for a given year. A specific gravity of 0.1 for freshly fallen snow is used, which means that ten inches (25.4 cm) of freshly fallen snow is assumed to be equal to one inch (2.54 cm) of rain. The mean annual total precipitation and snowfall maps on this plate are primarily based on thirty-year data during the period 1921 to 1950 inclusive.

Percent of Average Precipitation represents the accumulation of precipitation for a location, divided by the long term average value. The long term average value is defined as the average amount over the 1981 – 2010 period. Products are produced for the following timeframes: Agricultural Year, Growing Season, Winter Season, as well as rolling products for 30, 60, 90, 180, 270, 365, 730, 1095, 1460 and 1825 days.

Contained within the 4th Edition (1974) of the Atlas of Canada is a collection of six maps. Each map shows the average monthly precipitation for April, May, June, July, August and September.

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Northern Region Office (NRO), maintains 33 precipitation stations that were installed starting in 1944. Stations record total annual precipitation. This information can help inform annual water budgets or track climate-related trends in annual precipitation. The CSV file contains total annual precipitation data in inches. The PDF file contains a description of stations and methods for data collection.

Q: Was the month drier or wetter than usual? A: Colors show where and by how much monthly precipitation totals differed from average precipitation for the same month from 1991-2020. Green areas were wetter than the 30-year average for the month and brown areas were drier. White and very light areas had monthly precipitation totals close to the long-term average. Q: Where do these measurements come from? A: Daily measurements of rain and snow come from weather stations in the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN-D). Volunteer observers or automated instruments gather the data and submit them to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). After scientists check the quality of the data to omit any systematic errors, they calculate each station’s monthly total and plot it on a 5x5 km gridded map. To fill in the grid at locations without stations, a computer program interpolates (or estimates) values, accounting for the distribution of stations and various physical relationships, such as the way temperature changes with elevation. The resulting product is the NOAA Monthly U.S. Climate Gridded Dataset (NClimGrid). To calculate the percent of average precipitation values shown on these maps—also called precipitation anomalies—NCEI scientists take the total precipitation in each 5x5 km grid box for a single month and year, and divide it by its 1991-2020 average for the same month. Multiplying that number by 100 yields a percent of average precipitation. If the result is greater than 100%, the region was wetter than average. Less than 100% means the region was drier than usual. Q: What do the colors mean? A: Shades of brown show places where total precipitation was below the long-term average for the month. Areas shown in shades of green had more liquid water from rain and/or snow than they averaged from 1991 to 2020. The darker the shade of brown or green, the larger the difference from the average precipitation. White and very light areas show where precipitation totals were the same as or very close to the long-term average. Note that snowfall totals are reported as the amount of liquid water they produce upon melting. Thus, a 10-inch snowfall that melts to produce one inch of liquid water would be counted as one inch of precipitation. Q: Why do these data matter? A: Comparing an area’s recent precipitation to its long-term average can tell how wet or how dry the area is compared to usual. Knowing if an area is much drier or much wetter than usual can encourage people to pay close attention to on-the-ground conditions that affect daily life and decisions. People check maps like this to judge crop progress; monitor reservoir levels; consider if lawns and landscaping need water; and to understand the possibilities of flooding. Q: How did you produce these snapshots? A: Data Snapshots are derivatives of existing data products; to meet the needs of a broad audience, we present the source data in a simplified visual style. This set of snapshots is based on climate data (NClimGrid) produced by and available from the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). To produce our images, we invoke a set of scripts that access the source data and represent them according to our selected color ramps on our base maps. Additional information The data used in these snapshots can be downloaded from different places and in different formats. We used these specific data sources: NClimGrid Total Precipitation NClimGrid Precipitation Normals References NOAA Monthly U.S. Climate Gridded Dataset (NClimGrid) NOAA Monthly U.S. Climate Divisional Database (NClimDiv) Improved Historical Temperature and Precipitation Time Series for U.S. Climate Divisions NCEI Monthly National Analysis Climate at a Glance - Data Information NCEI Climate Monitoring - All ProductsSource: https://www.climate.gov/maps-data/

A simulation of projected changes in mean annual precipitation from the period 1975 to 1995 to the period 2080 to 2100 is shown on this map. On average, precipitation increases, but it is not evenly distributed geographically. There are marked regions of decreasing, as well as increasing precipitation, over both land and ocean. Annual average precipitation generally increases over northern continents, and particularly during the winter. Warmer surface temperature would speed up the hydrological cycle at least partially, resulting in faster evaporation and more precipitation. The results are based on climate change simulations made with the Coupled Global Climate Model developed by Environment Canada.

[Metadata] Mean Annual Rainfall Isohyets in Millimeters for the Islands of Hawai‘i, Kaho‘olawe, Kaua‘i, Lāna‘i, Maui, Moloka‘i and O‘ahu. Source: 2011 Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii, https://www.hawaii.edu/climate-data-portal/rainfall-atlas. Note that Moloka‘I data/maps were updated in 2014. Please see Rainfall Atlas final report appendix for full method details: https://www.hawaii.edu/climate-data-portal/rainfall-atlas. Statewide GIS program staff downloaded data from UH Geography Department, Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii, February, 2019. Annual and monthly isohyets of mean rainfall were available for download. The statewide GIS program makes available only the annual layer. Both the monthly layers and the original annual layer are available from the Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii website, referenced above. Note: Contour attribute value represents the amount of annual rainfall, in millimeters, for that line/isohyet. For additional information, please see metadata at https://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/gis/data/isohyets.pdf or contact Hawaii Statewide GIS Program, Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, State of Hawaii; PO Box 2359, Honolulu, Hi. 96804; (808) 587-2846; email: gis@hawaii.gov; Website: https://planning.hawaii.gov/gis.

Dataset consists of twelve monthly images for 1991-2020, available in small, large, broadcast media, full size zip, and KML archive formats. These images were derived from NOAA Monthly U.S. Climate Gridded Dataset (NClimGrid).Description from Climate.gov:Q:How much rain and snow usually fall this month?A:Based on daily observations from 1991-2020, colors on the map show long-term average precipitation totals in 5x5 km grid cells for the month displayed. The darker the color, the higher the total precipitation.Q:Where do these measurements come from?A:Daily totals of rain and snow come from weather stations in the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN-D). Volunteer observers or automated instruments gathered the data from 1991 to 2020 and submitted them to the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). After scientists checked the quality of the data to omit any systematic errors, they calculated each station’s monthly total and plotted it on a 5x5 km gridded map. To fill in the grid at locations without stations, a computer program interpolates (or estimates) values, accounting for the distribution of stations and various physical relationships, such as the way temperature changes with elevation. The resulting product is the NOAA Monthly U.S. Climate Gridded Dataset (NClimGrid).Q:What do the colors mean?A:White areas on the map received an average of zero measurable precipitation during the month from 1991-2020. Areas shown in the lightest green received a monthly average of less than one inch of water from rain or snow over the 30-year period. The darker the color on the map, the higher the average precipitation total for the month. Areas shown in dark blue received an average of eight or more inches of water that fell as either rain or snow. Note that snowfall totals are reported as the amount of liquid water they produce upon melting. Thus, a 10-inch snowfall that melts to produce one inch of liquid water would be counted as one inch of precipitation.Q:Why do these data matter?A:Understanding these values provides insight into the “normal” conditions for a month. This type of information is widely used across an array of planning activities, from designing energy distribution networks, to the timing of crop and plant emergence, to choosing the right place and time for recreational activities.Q:How did you produce these snapshots?A:Data Snapshots are derivatives of existing data products: to meet the needs of a broad audience, we present the source data in a simplified visual style. This set of snapshots is based on climate data (NClimGrid) produced by and available from the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). To produce our images, we invoke a set of scripts that access the source data and represent them according to our selected color ramps on our base maps.Additional informationThe data used in these snapshots can be downloaded from different places and in different formats. We used these specific data sources:NClimGrid Precipitation Normals ReferencesNOAA Monthly U.S. Climate Gridded Dataset (NClimGrid)NOAA Monthly U.S. Climate Divisional Database (NClimDiv)Improved Historical Temperature and Precipitation Time Series for U.S. Climate Divisions)NCEI Monthly National Analysis)Climate at a Glance - Data Information)NCEI Climate Monitoring - All Products

What does the data show?

The data shows the annual average of precipitation amount (mm) for the 1991-2020 period from HadUK gridded data. It is provided on a 12km British National Grid (BNG).

Limitations of the data

We recommend the use of multiple grid cells or an average of grid cells around a point of interest to help users get a sense of the variability in the area. This will provide a more robust set of values for informing decisions based on the data.

What are the naming conventions and how do I explore the data?

This data contains a field for the average over the 1991-2020 period. It is named 'pr' (precipitation).

To understand how to explore the data, see this page: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/457e7a2bc73e40b089fac0e47c63a578

Data source:

·
Version: HadUK-Grid v1.1.0.0 (downloaded 21/06/2022)

·
Source: https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/652cea3b8b4446f7bff73be0ce99ba0f

·
Filename: rainfall_hadukgrid_uk_12km_ann-30y_199101-202012.nc

Useful links

·
Further information on HadUK-Grid

·
Further information on understanding climate data within the Met Office Climate Data Portal

Abstract This dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from a source dataset. The source dataset is identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement The data contains mean annual rainfall for whole of Namoi subregion from 1900 to 2012. The last 30 years of data (1983 to 2012) is used to project rainfall data for three 30-year blocks starting from …Show full descriptionAbstract This dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from a source dataset. The source dataset is identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement The data contains mean annual rainfall for whole of Namoi subregion from 1900 to 2012. The last 30 years of data (1983 to 2012) is used to project rainfall data for three 30-year blocks starting from 2013 to 2102 using rainfall scaling factors. Purpose The data is used in the AWRA-L/R model to project future runoff under baseline and coal resource development pathway. The data is also used to plot time series of observed (1900 to 2012) and projected (2013 to 2102) annual precipitation averaged over the Namoi subregion using the script climate.m that takes input extends to three 30-year periods with scaling factors. bsmooth.m returns weighted smoothing of vector [x] over a window of length lwin = 23 years. The resulting plot is shown in NAM261 report. Dataset History This resource was created using BAWAP data. This source data was is the Bureau of Meteorology rainfall grids. The annual data were generated from daily data. Dataset Citation Bioregional Assessment Programme (2017) Namoi mean annual rainfall time series prediction. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 12 March 2019, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/74aeaba9-1c47-443e-8940-2befe8ff8dce. Dataset Ancestors Derived From Mean climate variables for all subregions Derived From BILO Gridded Climate Data: Daily Climate Data for each year from 1900 to 2012

Contained within the 4th Edition (1974) of the Atlas of Canada is a set of two maps. One map shows the average precipitation for April to September. The second shows the average precipitation for October to March.