API Crude Oil Stock Change in the United States increased to 1.54 BBL/1Million in July 25 from -0.58 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States API Crude Oil Stock Change- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

API Gasoline Stocks in the United States increased to 1.90 BBL/1Million in July 11 from -2.20 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States Api Gasoline Stocks- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Access the American Petroleum Institute's (API) Weekly Statistical Bulletin (WSB), providing essential data for the US and regional petroleum markets.

Stocks of crude oil in the United States increased by 7.70million barrels in the week ending July 25 of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Crude Oil Stocks Change - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

This dataset provides values for API CRUDE OIL STOCK CHANGE reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

API Crude Runs in the United States increased to 0.09 BBL/1Million in April 5 from -0.01 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States API Refinery Crude Runs- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

API Cushing Number in the United States remained unchanged at 0.10 BBL/1Million in July 11 from 0.10 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States Api Cushing Number- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

API Distillate Stocks in the United States increased to 0.80 BBL/1Million in July 11 from -0.80 BBL/1Million in the previous week. This dataset provides - United States API Distillate Stocks Change- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

The Ecuadorian oil and gas midstream market, encompassing transportation, storage, and LNG terminals, is experiencing steady growth, projected to maintain a CAGR above 1.03% from 2025 to 2033. While precise market size data for 2025 is unavailable, industry analysis suggests a figure in the tens of millions of dollars, given Ecuador's oil production levels and existing infrastructure. Key drivers include increasing domestic demand for energy, growing investments in infrastructure modernization, and government initiatives to improve energy security. The transportation segment is likely the largest, driven by the need to efficiently move crude oil and refined products across the country. Storage solutions are also crucial for maintaining supply chain stability and managing fluctuations in production. The LNG terminal segment, though potentially smaller, presents significant growth opportunities due to rising global demand for LNG and potential export opportunities. However, market growth faces constraints such as the volatility of global oil prices, potential regulatory hurdles, and infrastructure limitations. Companies like Eni SpA, OCP Ecuador, Techint, Sycar LLC, and Occidental Petroleum Corporation are actively shaping this market through investments and operational activities. Significant opportunities exist for expansion and modernization within the Ecuadorian oil and gas midstream sector. Foreign direct investment (FDI) will likely play a crucial role in funding large-scale infrastructure projects. Technological advancements, particularly in pipeline management and storage optimization, are expected to enhance efficiency and reduce operational costs. Furthermore, a focus on sustainable practices and environmental regulations will be increasingly important in shaping the industry's trajectory. The market's future success hinges on a balance between robust infrastructure development, effective regulatory frameworks, and environmentally conscious operations. Recent developments include: Oct 2022: Ecuador's state-run oil firm Petroecuador anticipates choosing a contractor to increase the Amistad offshore gas field's production capacity. To boost the field's natural gas production from its present level of 100 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) to 24 mmcfd, the selected contractor would invest at least USD 500 million. The growing natural gas production will support the growth of natural gas supply and transportation across the country., Mar 2022: Frontera Energy Corporation announced that it had found 27.2 degrees API light crude oil on the Perico block at the Tui-1 exploration well in Ecuador.. Notable trends are: Transportation Sector to Witness Growth.

The size of the Ecuador Oil and Gas Midstream Market was valued at USD XX Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD XXX Million by 2032, with an expected CAGR of > 1.03% during the forecast period. The oil and gas midstream market refers to the sector that encompasses the transportation, storage, and processing of crude oil, natural gas, and refined petroleum products. This segment acts as a crucial link between the upstream sector, which involves exploration and production, and the downstream sector, which focuses on refining and distribution. Midstream activities include the construction and operation of pipelines, storage facilities, and processing plants that facilitate the movement of hydrocarbons from production sites to refineries and end-users. Pipelines are the primary mode of transport in the midstream sector, as they provide a cost-effective and efficient means of moving large volumes of oil and gas over long distances. Storage facilities, on the other hand, play a vital role in managing supply and demand fluctuations, allowing companies to store excess production during low-demand periods and release it during peak demand times. Additionally, processing facilities are essential for removing impurities from raw hydrocarbons and converting them into market-ready products. Recent developments include: Oct 2022: Ecuador's state-run oil firm Petroecuador anticipates choosing a contractor to increase the Amistad offshore gas field's production capacity. To boost the field's natural gas production from its present level of 100 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) to 24 mmcfd, the selected contractor would invest at least USD 500 million. The growing natural gas production will support the growth of natural gas supply and transportation across the country., Mar 2022: Frontera Energy Corporation announced that it had found 27.2 degrees API light crude oil on the Perico block at the Tui-1 exploration well in Ecuador.. Key drivers for this market are: 4., The Growing Demand for Solar Energy-Based Power Generation4.; Declining Photovoltaic System Prices. Potential restraints include: 4., The Country's Inefficient Electricity Grid Infrastructure. Notable trends are: Transportation Sector to Witness Growth.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 481 samples of produced water (PW) from 408 sites in the Edison, Mountain View, and Ant Hill Oil Fields in Kern County, California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 199 wells, 67 sumps, 43 storage tanks (not associated with a specific well), and 104 unidentifiable sample sources which could not be classified because of insufficient information. The wells include 176 sites identifiable by an API (American Petroleum Institute) number and 23 sites for which an API designation could not be found, but which based on the water chemistry data source, site name, sample description, or other ancillary information have been classified as wells. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval or zone produced, are available for 177 of these wells. Sites representing sumps and storage tanks were classified in a similar manner as wells based on the water chemistry data source, site name, sample description, or other ancillary information. Numerical water chemistry data were compiled from six data sources: 1) California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) Aquifer Exemptions (AE) Status webpage analytical reports (CalGEM, 2016), 2) CalGEM archived analytical reports (CalGEM, 2021), 3) CalGEM Underground Injection Control (UIC) program hard copies of laboratory analytical reports (CalGEM-UIC, 2017), 4) CalGEM's online Well Finder (WF) database of well history files (CalGEM-WF, 2022), 5) California State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker (SWRCB-GT) online data portal analytical reports (SWRCB-GT, 2022), and 6) three California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) historical reports with water-chemistry data for samples from oil-producing zones of wells (characterized as "formation" water) and wastewater disposal sumps (CDWR/CVRWQCB-E, 1953; CDWR/CVRWQCB-M, 1956; and CDWR/CVRWQCB-A, 1957). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM-WF (2022). The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file (EMA_PW_Summary_Data.xlsx) identifying each site by name, the site location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination of the sample (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples associated with Site Type labeled as water disposal well), specific sample dates for each site, and an inventory of which constituent groups were sampled on each date; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected constituents (EMA_PW_Geochemistry.xlsx) classified into one of the following groups: water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, trace elements, naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and hydrocarbons. Ion (charge) balance calculations and percent error of these calculations were included for samples having a complete suite of major ion analyses. Analytical method, reporting level, reporting level type, dilution factor, and supplemental notes were included where available or pertinent. A data dictionary (EMA_PW_Data-Dictionary. xlsx) describes the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

This digital dataset contains historical geochemical and other information for 45 samples of produced water from 38 sites in the Placerita and Newhall Oil Fields in Los Angeles County, southern California. Produced water is a term used in the oil industry to describe water that is produced from oil wells as a byproduct along with the oil and gas. The locations from which these historical samples have been collected include 17 wells, 6 storage tanks, and 15 unidentifiable sample sources. Well depth, perforation depths, and (or) depths referred to on geochemistry reports as interval of zone produced, are available for all 17 wells. Designated well use and sample descriptions provide further insight about what the samples represent. The well use designation for 13 of the wells is OG (oil/gas). The samples (16) associated with these wells likely represent produced water based on well designation and history, although samples from two wells (Dataset ID 23 and 32) are described as formation water. Four wells have a site type designation of "injectate" based on the current designated well use (INJ, injection; or WD, water disposal), but samples from two of the four wells (Dataset ID 31 and 35) likely represent produced or formation water as well history records indicate that sample collection predated conversion to (Dataset ID 31) or the commencement of (Dataset ID 35) use for water disposal. Limited information is available about historical samples from storage tanks and unidentifiable sample sources. These samples may represent pre- or post-treated composite samples of produced water from single or multiple wells. The numerical water chemistry data were compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from the following sources: scanned laboratory analysis reports available from the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) Underground Injection Control (UIC) program, analytical reports located within well history files in CalGEM's online Well Finder (WF) database, analytical reports available as PDFs (Portable Document Format) documents located on the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker (SWRCB-GT) website, and data compiled by the USGS for the National Produced Water Geochemical Database (USGS PWDB). Sample site characteristics, such as well construction details, were attributed using a combination of information provided with the scanned laboratory analysis reports and well history files from CalGEM Well Finder. The compiled data are divided into two separate data files described as follows: 1) a summary data file identifying each site by name, the site location, basic construction information, and American Petroleum Institute (API) number (for wells), the number of chemistry samples, period of record, sample description, and the geologic formation associated with the origin of the sampled water, or intended destination of the sample (formation into which water was to intended to be injected for samples labeled as injectate), specific sample dates for each site, and an inventory of which constituent groups were sampled on each date; and 2) a data file of geochemistry analyses for selected water-quality indicators, major and minor ions, nutrients, trace elements, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), tracers, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons, and organic acids. Ion (charge) balance calculations and percent error of these calculations were included for samples having a complete suite of major ion analyses. Analytical method, reporting level, reporting level type, and supplemental notes were included where available or pertinent. A data dictionary was created to describe the geochemistry data file and is provided with this data release.

Stocks of gasoline in the United States decreased by2725 thousand barrels in the week ending July 25 of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Gasoline Stocks Change - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.