App Download Key StatisticsApp and Game DownloadsiOS App and Game DownloadsGoogle Play App and Game DownloadsGame DownloadsiOS Game DownloadsGoogle Play Game DownloadsApp DownloadsiOS App...

Unlock the power of user feedback with our iOS App Store Reviews Dataset, a comprehensive collection of reviews from thousands of apps across various categories. This robust App Store dataset includes essential details such as app names, ratings, user comments, timestamps, and more, offering valuable insights into user experiences and preferences.

Perfect for app developers, marketers, and data analysts, this dataset allows you to conduct sentiment analysis, monitor app performance, and identify trends in user behavior. By leveraging the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset, you can refine app features, optimize marketing strategies, and elevate user satisfaction.

Whether you’re tracking mobile app trends, analyzing specific app categories, or developing data-driven strategies, this App Store dataset is an indispensable tool. Download the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset today or contact us for custom datasets tailored to your unique project requirements.

Ready to take your app insights to the next level? Get the iOS App Store Reviews Dataset now or explore our custom data solutions to meet your needs.

This dataset encompasses a wide-ranging collection of Google Play applications, providing a holistic view of the diverse ecosystem within the platform. It includes information on various attributes such as the title, developer, monetization features, images, app descriptions, data safety measures, user ratings, number of reviews, star rating distributions, user feedback, recent updates, related applications by the same developer, content ratings, estimated downloads, and timestamps. By aggregating this data, the dataset offers researchers, developers, and analysts an extensive resource to explore and analyze trends, patterns, and dynamics within the Google Play Store. Researchers can utilize this dataset to conduct comprehensive studies on user behavior, market trends, and the impact of various factors on app success. Developers can leverage the insights derived from this dataset to inform their app development strategies, improve user engagement, and optimize monetization techniques. Analysts can employ the dataset to identify emerging trends, assess the performance of different categories of applications, and gain valuable insights into consumer preferences. Overall, this dataset serves as a valuable tool for understanding the broader landscape of the Google Play Store and unlocking actionable insights for various stakeholders in the mobile app industry.

Use the OpenWeb Ninja Google Play App Store Data API to access comprehensive data on Google Play Store, including Android Apps / Games, reviews, top charts, search, and more. Our extensive dataset provides over 40 app store data points, enabling you to gain deep insights into the market.

The App Store Data dataset includes all key app details:

App Name, Description, Rating, Photos, Downloads, Version Information, App Size, Permissions, Developer and Contact Information, Consumer Review Data.

Apple App Store Key StatisticsApps & Games in the Apple App StoreApps in the Apple App StoreGames in the Apple App StoreMost Popular Apple App Store CategoriesPaid vs Free Apps in Apple App...

Get access to information about all apps in the Google Playstore to understand your competitors, market to app developers etc. This dataset includes all the fields available in the play store such as:

• Name, description, rating information etc.
• Technical information such as size, app version etc.
• Permissions.
• Developer information.
• Contact information.
• Parsed app-ads.txt information for publisher domains.
• Reviews (more than 100 million reviews available)

This is the dataset used for paper: "A Recommender System of Buggy App Checkers for App Store Moderators", published on the International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft) in 2015.

Dataset Collection We built a dataset that consists of a random sample of Android app metadata and user reviews available on the Google Play Store on January and March 2014. Since the Google Play Store is continuously evolving (adding, removing and/or updating apps), we updated the dataset twice. The dataset D1 contains available apps in the Google Play Store in January 2014. Then, we created a new snapshot (D2) of the Google Play Store in March 2014.

The apps belong to the 27 different categories defined by Google (at the time of writing the paper), and the 4 predefined subcategories (free, paid, new_free, and new_paid). For each category-subcategory pair (e.g. tools-free, tools-paid, sports-new_free, etc.), we collected a maximum of 500 samples, resulting in a median number of 1.978 apps per category.

For each app, we retrieved the following metadata: name, package, creator, version code, version name, number of downloads, size, upload date, star rating, star counting, and the set of permission requests.

In addition, for each app, we collected up to a maximum of the latest 500 reviews posted by users in the Google Play Store. For each review, we retrieved its metadata: title, description, device, and version of the app. None of these fields were mandatory, thus several reviews lack some of these details. From all the reviews attached to an app, we only considered the reviews associated with the latest version of the app —i.e., we discarded unversioned and old-versioned reviews. Thus, resulting in a corpus of 1,402,717 reviews (2014 Jan.).

Dataset Stats Some stats about the datasets:

• D1 (Jan. 2014) contains 38,781 apps requesting 7,826 different permissions, and 1,402,717 user reviews.

• D2 (Mar. 2014) contains 46,644 apps and 9,319 different permission requests, and 1,361,319 user reviews.

Additional stats about the datasets are available here.

Dataset Description To store the dataset, we created a graph database with Neo4j. This dataset therefore consists of a graph describing the apps as nodes and edges. We chose a graph database because the graph visualization helps to identify connections among data (e.g., clusters of apps sharing similar sets of permission requests).

In particular, our dataset graph contains six types of nodes: - APP nodes containing metadata of each app, - PERMISSION nodes describing permission types, - CATEGORY nodes describing app categories, - SUBCATEGORY nodes describing app subcategories, - USER_REVIEW nodes storing user reviews. - TOPIC topics mined from user reviews (using LDA).

Furthermore, there are five types of relationships between APP nodes and each of the remaining nodes:

• USES_PERMISSION relationships between APP and PERMISSION nodes
• HAS_REVIEW between APP and USER_REVIEW nodes
• HAS_TOPIC between USER_REVIEW and TOPIC nodes
• BELONGS_TO_CATEGORY between APP and CATEGORY nodes
• BELONGS_TO_SUBCATEGORY between APP and SUBCATEGORY nodes

Dataset Files Info

Neo4j 2.0 Databases

googlePlayDB1-Jan2014_neo4j_2_0.rar

googlePlayDB2-Mar2014_neo4j_2_0.rar We provide two Neo4j databases containing the 2 snapshots of the Google Play Store (January and March 2014). These are the original databases created for the paper. The databases were created with Neo4j 2.0. In particular with the tool version 'Neo4j 2.0.0-M06 Community Edition' (latest version available at the time of implementing the paper in 2014).

Neo4j 3.5 Databases

googlePlayDB1-Jan2014_neo4j_3_5_28.rar

googlePlayDB2-Mar2014_neo4j_3_5_28.rar Currently, the version Neo4j 2.0 is deprecated and it is not available for download in the official Neo4j Download Center. We have migrated the original databases (Neo4j 2.0) to Neo4j 3.5.28. The databases can be opened with the tool version: 'Neo4j Community Edition 3.5.28'. The tool can be downloaded from the official Neo4j Donwload page.

  In order to open the databases with more recent versions of Neo4j, the databases must be first migrated to the corresponding version. Instructions about the migration process can be found in the Neo4j Migration Guide.

  First time the Neo4j database is connected, it could request credentials. The username and pasword are: neo4j/neo4j

The dataset contains year, month and payment application-wise UPI Apps Transaction Statistics like Customer Initiated Transactions, B2C Transactions, B2B Transactions and On-us Transactions Note: 1) Unified Payments Interface(UPI) is an instant real-time payment system developed by National Payments Corporation of India. The interface facilitates inter-bank peer-to-peer and person-to-merchant transactions 2) From January 2021 onwards, ‚On-us Transactions‚ in UPI that are not processed and settled through the UPI Central System is shown under ‚ On-us Transactions column 3) Apps which has volume less than 10,000 is included under‚ Other Apps. 4) App volume in table is basis the Payer App logic, i.e the financial transaction is attributed to the PSP in UPI on the Payer's side. 5) BHIM Volume is inclusive of *99# volume. 6) For WhatsApp, Maximum registered user base of hundred (100) million in UPI

The name and download numbers of government mobile apps.

The amount of Android apps available for download is constantly increasing, exerting a continuous pressure on developers to publish outstanding apps. Google Play (GP) is the default distribution channel for Android apps, which provides mobile app users with metrics to identify and report apps quality such as rating, amount of downloads, previous users comments, etc. In addition to those metrics, GP presents a set of top charts that highlight the outstanding apps in different categories. Both metrics and top app charts help developers to identify whether their development decisions are well valued by the community. Therefore, app presence in these top charts is a valuable information when understanding the features of top-apps. In this paper we present Hall-of-Apps, a dataset containing top charts' apps metadata extracted (weekly) from GP, for 4 different countries, during 30 weeks. The data is presented as (i) raw HTML files, (ii) a MongoDB database with all the information contained in app's HTML files (e.g., app description, category, general rating, etc.), and (iii) data visualizations built with the D3.js framework. A first characterization of the data along with the urls to retrieve it can be found in our online appendix: https://thesoftwaredesignlab.github.io/hall-of-apps-tools/

Context

Andriod apps meta-data in JSON format

Content

Meta-data of around 50k android apps. Containing information about the downloads, category, likes, dislikes, ratings, description, and much more.

This dataset comprises 10,000 user reviews of the BCA Mobile app collected from the Google Play Store between December 24, 2023, and June 12, 2024. Each review includes the user's name, the rating they provided (ranging from 1 to 5 stars), the timestamp of when the review was created, and the text content of the review. The dataset is in Indonesian and focuses on feedback from users in Indonesia. This data can be used to perform sentiment analysis, understand user experiences, identify common issues, and assess the overall performance of the BCA Mobile app during the specified timeframe. The reviews are sorted based on the newest first, providing the latest feedback at the top.

Transit is a mobile app packed with features that helps you plan a trip on Loudoun County Transit buses. Real time bus tracking and information, service alerts and trip planners are some of the many useful features that make this app the favorite for transportation services.Download Transit app to your device for free and set your favorite routes to begin receiving notifications and real-time bus information.Transit Support

Austin Energy’s free, interactive web app allows customers to monitor their daily energy usage, view their bill history, and see a future forecast of their energy bill cost. They can also set alerts to warn them of an upcoming rate tier change. Austin Energy Web App users can also download Green Button Data which can help them better understand their energy usage and take action towards savings. This data set shows the number of web app users by month. Learn more about the app at http://powersaver.austinenergy.com/wps/portal/psp/residential/learn/free-home-energy-management-options/alerts-and-tips-help-you-manage-your-energy-costs

PLEASE UPVOTE IF YOU LIKE THIS CONTENT! 😍

Duolingo is an American educational technology company that produces learning apps and provides language certification. There main app is considered the most popular language learning app in the world.

To progress in their learning journey, each user of the application needs to complete a set of lessons in which they are presented with the words of the language they want to learn. In an infinite set of lessons, each word is applied in a different context and, on top of that, Duolingo uses a spaced repetition approach, where the user sees an already known word again to reinforce their learning.

Each line in this file refers to a Duolingo lesson that had a target word to practice.

The columns are as follows:

• p_recall - proportion of exercises from this lesson/practice where the word/lexeme was correctly recalled
• timestamp - UNIX timestamp of the current lesson/practice
• delta - time (in seconds) since the last lesson/practice that included this word/lexeme
• user_id - student user ID who did the lesson/practice (anonymized)
• learning_language - language being learned
• ui_language - user interface language (presumably native to the student)
• lexeme_id - system ID for the lexeme tag (i.e., word)
• lexeme_string - lexeme tag (see below)
• history_seen - total times user has seen the word/lexeme prior to this lesson/practice
• history_correct - total times user has been correct for the word/lexeme prior to this lesson/practice
• session_seen - times the user saw the word/lexeme during this lesson/practice
• session_correct - times the user got the word/lexeme correct during this lesson/practice

The lexeme_string column contains a string representation of the "lexeme tag" used by Duolingo for each lesson/practice (data instance) in our experiments. The lexeme_string field uses the following format:

`surface-form/lemma

WorldPop produces different types of gridded population count datasets, depending on the methods used and end application. Please make sure you have read our Mapping Populations overview page before choosing and downloading a dataset.


Bespoke methods used to produce datasets for specific individual countries are available through the WorldPop Open Population Repository (WOPR) link below. These are 100m resolution gridded population estimates using customized methods ("bottom-up" and/or "top-down") developed for the latest data available from each country. They can also be visualised and explored through the woprVision App.
The remaining datasets in the links below are produced using the "top-down" method, with either the unconstrained or constrained top-down disaggregation method used. Please make sure you read the Top-down estimation modelling overview page to decide on which datasets best meet your needs. Datasets are available to download in Geotiff and ASCII XYZ format at a resolution of 3 and 30 arc-seconds (approximately 100m and 1km at the equator, respectively):

- Unconstrained individual countries 2000-2020 ( 1km resolution ): Consistent 1km resolution population count datasets created using unconstrained top-down methods for all countries of the World for each year 2000-2020.
- Unconstrained individual countries 2000-2020 ( 100m resolution ): Consistent 100m resolution population count datasets created using unconstrained top-down methods for all countries of the World for each year 2000-2020.
- Unconstrained individual countries 2000-2020 UN adjusted ( 100m resolution ): Consistent 100m resolution population count datasets created using unconstrained top-down methods for all countries of the World for each year 2000-2020 and adjusted to match United Nations national population estimates (UN 2019)
-Unconstrained individual countries 2000-2020 UN adjusted ( 1km resolution ): Consistent 1km resolution population count datasets created using unconstrained top-down methods for all countries of the World for each year 2000-2020 and adjusted to match United Nations national population estimates (UN 2019).
-Unconstrained global mosaics 2000-2020 ( 1km resolution ): Mosaiced 1km resolution versions of the "Unconstrained individual countries 2000-2020" datasets.
-Constrained individual countries 2020 ( 100m resolution ): Consistent 100m resolution population count datasets created using constrained top-down methods for all countries of the World for 2020.
-Constrained individual countries 2020 UN adjusted ( 100m resolution ): Consistent 100m resolution population count datasets created using constrained top-down methods for all countries of the World for 2020 and adjusted to match United Nations national population estimates (UN 2019).

Older datasets produced for specific individual countries and continents, using a set of tailored geospatial inputs and differing "top-down" methods and time periods are still available for download here: Individual countries and Whole Continent.

Data for earlier dates is available directly from WorldPop.

WorldPop (www.worldpop.org - School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton; Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of Louisville; Departement de Geographie, Universite de Namur) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University (2018). Global High Resolution Population Denominators Project - Funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1134076). https://dx.doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/WP00645

Dataset consisting of feature vectors of 215 attributes extracted from 15,036 applications (5,560 malware apps from Drebin project and 9,476 benign apps). The dataset has been used to develop and evaluate multilevel classifier fusion approach for Android malware detection, published in the IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics paper 'DroidFusion: A Novel Multilevel Classifier Fusion Approach for Android Malware Detection'. The supporting file contains further description of the feature vectors/attributes obtained via static code analysis of the Android apps.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13364933%2F23694fae55e2e76299358693ba6f32b9%2Flv-share.jpg?generation=1684843825246772&alt=media" alt=""> ➡️ There are total 3 datasets containing valuable information. ➡️ Understand people's fame and behavior's on a dating app platform. | Column Name | Description | |---------------------|------------------------------| | Age | The age of the user. | | Number of Users | The total number of users. | | Percent Want Chats | Percentage of users who want chats. | | Percent Want Friends| Percentage of users who want friendships. | | Percent Want Dates | Percentage of users who want romantic dates. | | Mean Kisses Received| Average number of kisses received by users. | | Mean Visits Received| Average number of profile visits received by users. | | Mean Followers | Average number of followers for each user. | | Mean Languages Known| Average number of languages known by users. | | Total Want Chats | Total count of users interested in chats. | | Total Want Friends | Total count of users looking for friendships. | | Total Want Dates | Total count of users seeking romantic dates. | | Total Kisses Received| Overall count of kisses received by users. | | Total Visits Received| Overall count of profile visits received by users. | | Total Followers | Overall count of followers for all users. | | Total Languages Spoken| Total count of languages spoken by all users. |

SUMMARY

When Dating apps like Tinder were becoming viral, people wanted to have the best profile in order to get more matches and more potential encounters. Unlike other previous dating platforms, those new ones emphasized on the mutuality of attraction before allowing any two people to get in touch and chat. This made it all the more important to create the best profile in order to get the best first impression.

Parallel to that, we Humans have always been in awe before charismatic and inspiring people. The more charismatic people tend to be followed and listened to by more people. Through their metrics such as the number of friends/followers, social networks give some ways of "measuring" the potential charisma of some people.

In regard to all that, one can then think:

what makes a great user profile ? how to make the best first impression in order to get more matches (and ultimately find love, or new friendships) ? what makes a person charismatic ? how do charismatic people present themselves ? In order to try and understand those different social questions, I decided to create a dataset of user profile informations using the social network Lovoo when it came out. By using different methodologies, I was able to gather user profile data, as well as some usually unavailable metrics (such as the number of profile visits).

Content

The dataset contains user profile infos of users of the website Lovoo.

The dataset was gathered during spring 2015 (april, may). At that time, Lovoo was expanding in european countries (among others), while Tinder was trending both in America and in Europe. At that time the iOS version of the Lovoo app was in version 3.

Accessory image data The dataset references pictures (field pictureId) of user profiles. These pictures are also available for a fraction of users but have not been uploaded and should be asked separately.

The idea when gathering the profile pictures was to determine whether some correlations could be identified between a profile picture and the reputation or success of a given profile. Since first impression matters, a sound hypothesis to make is that the profile picture might have a great influence on the number of profile visits, matches and so on. Do not forget that only a fraction of a user's profile is seen when browsing through a list of users.

https://s1.dmcdn.net/v/BnWkG1M7WuJDq2PKP/x480

Details about collection methodology In order to gather the data, I developed a set of tools that would save the data while browsing through profiles and doing searches. Because of this approach (and the constraints that forced me to develop this approach) I could only gather user profiles that were recommended by Lovoo's algorithm for 2 profiles I created for this purpose occasion (male, open to friends & chats & dates). That is why there are only female users in the dataset. Another work could be done to fetch similar data for both genders or other age ranges.

Regarding the number of user profiles It turned out that the recommendation algorithm always seemed to output the same set of user profiles. This meant Lovoo's algorithm was probably heavily relying on settings like location (to recommend more people nearby than people in different places or countries) and maybe cookies. This diminished the number of different user profiles that would be pr...

NOTICE TO PROVISIONAL 2023 LAND USE DATA USERS: Please note that on December 6, 2024 the Department of Water Resources (DWR) published the Provisional 2023 Statewide Crop Mapping dataset. The link for the shapefile format of the data mistakenly linked to the wrong dataset. The link was updated with the appropriate data on January 27, 2025. If you downloaded the Provisional 2023 Statewide Crop Mapping dataset in shapefile format between December 6, 2024 and January 27, we encourage you to redownload the data. The Map Service and Geodatabase formats were correct as posted on December 06, 2024.

Thank you for your interest in DWR land use datasets.

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has been collecting land use data throughout the state and using it to develop agricultural water use estimates for statewide and regional planning purposes, including water use projections, water use efficiency evaluations, groundwater model developments, climate change mitigation and adaptations, and water transfers. These data are essential for regional analysis and decision making, which has become increasingly important as DWR and other state agencies seek to address resource management issues, regulatory compliances, environmental impacts, ecosystem services, urban and economic development, and other issues. Increased availability of digital satellite imagery, aerial photography, and new analytical tools make remote sensing-based land use surveys possible at a field scale that is comparable to that of DWR’s historical on the ground field surveys. Current technologies allow accurate large-scale crop and land use identifications to be performed at desired time increments and make possible more frequent and comprehensive statewide land use information. Responding to this need, DWR sought expertise and support for identifying crop types and other land uses and quantifying crop acreages statewide using remotely sensed imagery and associated analytical techniques. Currently, Statewide Crop Maps are available for the Water Years 2014, 2016, 2018- 2022 and PROVISIONALLY for 2023.

Historic County Land Use Surveys spanning 1986 - 2015 may also be accessed using the CADWR Land Use Data Viewer: https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/CADWRLandUseViewer.

For Regional Land Use Surveys follow: https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/region-land-use-surveys.

For County Land Use Surveys follow: https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/county-land-use-surveys.

For a collection of ArcGIS Web Applications that provide information on the DWR Land Use Program and our data products in various formats, visit the DWR Land Use Gallery: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/collections/dd14ceff7d754e85ab9c7ec84fb8790a.

Recommended citation for DWR land use data: California Department of Water Resources. (Water Year for the data). Statewide Crop Mapping—California Natural Resources Agency Open Data. Retrieved “Month Day, YEAR,” from https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/statewide-crop-mapping.