19 datasets found
  1. Apple: expenditure on research and development 2007-2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Apple: expenditure on research and development 2007-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/273006/apple-expenses-for-research-and-development/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    Apple Inc. spent a record **** billion U.S. dollars on research and development in its 2024 fiscal year, increasing by about *** billion from its 2023 total. The company’s massive research and development budget over the years has led to the release of various famous products including the iPhone, iPod, MacBook, and iPad. In 2024, the company released their first VR headset, the Apple Vision Pro. Apple Inc. Since its famous beginning in a garage in California, Apple has grown into a tech industry giant, today holding the title of the world’s most valuable brand. The company released over a dozen new products in 2023, with new generations of its iPhone, Apple Watch, and iPad being released. In addition to its consumer electronics products, the company develops a variety of software packages, applications, web browsers, and more recently, cloud technology offerings. On November 1, 2019, with the official launch of its ambitious Apple TV+, Apple also entered the over-the-top media service market, albeit late to the already competitive game. Apple’s massive range of compatible products and software bring in hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue each year and made it the first public company whose market value reaches the ****trillion U.S. dollar landmark.

  2. Apple R&d (beijing) Ltd. Shenzhen Branch Company profile with phone,email,...

    • volza.com
    csv
    Updated Sep 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Volza FZ LLC (2025). Apple R&d (beijing) Ltd. Shenzhen Branch Company profile with phone,email, buyers, suppliers, price, export import shipments. [Dataset]. https://www.volza.com/company-profile/apple-r-d-beijing-limited-shenzhen-branch-33066517
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 7, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Authors
    Volza FZ LLC
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2014 - Sep 30, 2021
    Area covered
    Shenzhen, Beijing
    Variables measured
    Count of exporters, Count of importers, Sum of export value, Sum of import value, Count of export shipments, Count of import shipments
    Description

    Credit report of Apple R&d (beijing) Ltd. Shenzhen Branch contains unique and detailed export import market intelligence with it's phone, email, Linkedin and details of each import and export shipment like product, quantity, price, buyer, supplier names, country and date of shipment.

  3. Technology hardware & equipment companies with the highest spending on R&D...

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Technology hardware & equipment companies with the highest spending on R&D 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1102851/global-research-development-leading-technology-hardware-equipment-spenders/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In 2023, the technology hardware manufacturer that spent the most on research and development (R&D) was the American giant Apple, with an R&D expenditure of over ** billion euros. Close behind came Chinese Huawei with a spending of almost ** billion euros, followed by Intel. The European hardware company with the highest R&D spending in 2023 was Ericsson.

  4. Apple : dépenses en R&D 2007-2024

    • fr.statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Nov 1, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Apple : dépenses en R&D 2007-2024 [Dataset]. https://fr.statista.com/statistiques/526241/apple-depenses-recherche-et-developpement/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 1, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2007 - 2024
    Area covered
    Monde
    Description

    Cette statistique présente les dépenses en recherche et développement (R&D) de la société Apple dans le monde entre 2007 et 2024, en milliards de dollars des États-Unis. Alors qu'en 2007 Apple investissait moins d'un milliard de dollars dans la recherche et développement, le pôle R&D était financé à hauteur de près de ***** milliards de dollars américains au cours de son exercice fiscal en 2024, soit une augmentation d'environ ** milliards par rapport au total de 2021. L'énorme budget de recherche et développement de l'entreprise au fil des ans a conduit à la sortie de plusieurs produits célèbres, notamment l'iPhone, l'iPod, le MacBook et l'iPad. En 2024, l'entreprise a commercialisé son premier casque VR, l'Apple Vision Pro.

  5. Companies with the highest spending on research and development 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Companies with the highest spending on research and development 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/265645/ranking-of-the-companies-with-the-highest-spending-on-research-and-development/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    Amazon spent the most on research and development in the fiscal year 2024, with over ** billion U.S. dollars. Alphabet, Meta, Apple, and Microsoft rounded out the top five of companies with the highest R&D spending that year. Leading by innovation Spending money on research and development, or R&D, is how a company innovates new technologies and conducts research to develop new products and services. R&D allows companies, such as Amazon, to stay ahead of their competition and work towards the future. Most of the R&D spending in the world in 2022 was within health & pharma, which should be seen in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the United States is the leading country for R&D expenditure in the world. AI and R&D Currently, many companies are investing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) innovation, including the ethical implications of AI and how it can be used to better society as a whole. Major companies, such as Amazon and Alphabet, are throwing their collective weight into this issue and conducting research into its future applications.

  6. f

    Summary of growth studies for apple development.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Maria D. Christodoulou; Alastair Culham (2023). Summary of growth studies for apple development. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252288.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Maria D. Christodoulou; Alastair Culham
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Summary of growth studies for apple development.

  7. Revenue of Apple from services segment 2013-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Revenue of Apple from services segment 2013-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/250918/apples-revenue-from-itunes-software-and-services/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In the first quarter of 2025, Apple generated a total of ***** billion U.S. dollars in services revenue. These services include iTunes, the company’s online entertainment library, as well as software, digital content, AppleCare, Apple Pay, and licensing. Overall, Apple’s services segment has shown strong growth over the last few years, passing the mark of *** billion U.S. dollars in revenue in a quarter for the first time in 2018. Apple's services segment now only trails the revenue generated by its largest segment, the iPhone, which brings in **** of billions of U.S. dollars each quarter. Apple Inc. Since its famous beginning in a garage in California, Apple has grown into a giant of the technology industry, becoming one of the most valuable companies in the world. Every year, it brings in ******** of billions of U.S. dollars and revolutionize the industry time and time again with its various consumer electronic devices. Some of the company’s most famous products include the Apple I, MacBook, iPod, Apple Watch, and the iPhone. In order to continue to innovate and improve its product offerings, Apple allocates over *** billion U.S. dollars per year towards its research and development budget. This massive R&D budget not only helps from a hardware perspective, but also assists in the development of more digital solutions to everyday needs such as iCloud and Apple Pay.

  8. Top tech hardware and equipment R&D investors worldwide 2019, by company

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Top tech hardware and equipment R&D investors worldwide 2019, by company [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/738632/worldwide-research-and-development-technology-hardware-and-equipment-investors/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of data from 2018 and 2019, Huawei ranked first among the top 25 investors into technology hardware and equipment research and development (R&D) having spent **** billion euros. Apple occupied second place with an R&D investment of **** billion U.S. dollars, whilst Intel in third invested **** billion U.S. dollars.

  9. Land suitability for Custard Apple for the FGARA project

    • researchdata.edu.au
    datadownload
    Updated Feb 19, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cuan Petheram; Warren Hicks; Doug Smith; Lauren Eyre; Mark Sugars; Keith Moodie; Mark Glover; Linda Gregory; Reanna Willis; Ben Harms; Dan Brough; Seonaid Philip; David Clifford; Mark Thomas; Rebecca Bartley (2014). Land suitability for Custard Apple for the FGARA project [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4225/08/53041911A3276
    Explore at:
    datadownloadAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    CSIROhttp://www.csiro.au/
    Authors
    Cuan Petheram; Warren Hicks; Doug Smith; Lauren Eyre; Mark Sugars; Keith Moodie; Mark Glover; Linda Gregory; Reanna Willis; Ben Harms; Dan Brough; Seonaid Philip; David Clifford; Mark Thomas; Rebecca Bartley
    License

    https://research.csiro.au/dap/licences/csiro-data-licence/https://research.csiro.au/dap/licences/csiro-data-licence/

    Time period covered
    Sep 1, 2013 - Jul 4, 2025
    Area covered
    Description

    This land suitability for Custard Apple raster data (in GeoTIFF format) represents areas of potential suitability for this crop and its specific irrigation management systems in the Flinders and Gilbert catchments of North Queensland. The data is coded 1-5: 1 - Suitable with no limitations; 2 - Suitable with minor limitations; 3 - Suitable with moderate limitations; 4 - Marginal; 5 - Unsuitable. The land suitability evaluation methods used to produce this data are a modification of methods of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN (FAO). This data is part of the Flinders and Gilbert Agricultural Resource Assessment (FGARA) project and is designed to support sustainable regional development in Australia being of importance to Australian Governments and agricultural industries. The project identifies new opportunities for irrigation development in these remote areas by providing improved soil and land evaluation data to identify opportunities and promote detailed investigation. A companion dataset exists, “Confidence of suitability data for the FGARA project”. A link to this dataset can be found in the “related materials” section of this metadata record. Lineage: These suitability raster data for Custard Apple and its individual irrigation management systems have been created from a range of inputs and processing steps. Below is an overview. For more information refer to the CSIRO FGARA published reports and in particular: Bartley R, Thomas MF, Clifford D, Phillip S, Brough D, Harms D, Willis R, Gregory L, Glover M, Moodie K, Sugars M, Eyre L, Smith DJ, Hicks W and Petheram C (2013) Land suitability: technical methods. A technical report to the Australian Government for the Flinders and Gilbert Agricultural Resource Assessment (FGARA) project, CSIRO. Broadly, the steps were to: 1. Collate existing data (data related to: climate, topography, soils, natural resources, remotely sensed etc of various formats; reports, spatial vector, spatial raster etc). 2. Select additional soil and attribute site data by Latin hypercube statistical sampling method applied across the covariate space. 3. Carry out fieldwork to collect additional soil and attribute data and understand geomorphology and landscapes. 4. Build models from selected input data and covariate data using predictive learning via rule ensembles in the RuleFit3 software. 5. Create Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) key attributes output data. DSM is the creation and population of a geo-referenced database, generated using field and laboratory observations, coupled with environmental data through quantitative relationships. It applies pedometrics - the use of mathematical and statistical models that combine information from soil observations with information contained in correlated environmental variables, remote sensing images and some geophysical measurements. 6. Choose land management options and create suitability rules for DSM attributes. 7. Run suitability rules to produce limitation datasets using a modification on the FAO methods. 8. Create final suitability data for all land management options. Two companion datasets exist for this dataset. The first is linked to in the “related materials” section of this metadata record, entitled “Confidence of suitability data for the FGARA project”. The second (held by CSIRO Land and Water) includes expert opinion and knowledge about landscape processes or conditions that will influence agricultural development potential in these catchments, but were not captured sufficiently in the modelling process (and areas of expert opinion where the Mahanabolis method underestimates confidence). The two landscape features that require special attention are the basalt rock outcrops in the Upper Flinders catchment that were not well captured by the covariate data, and the secondary salinisation hazard in the central Flinders catchment. For more information refer to the report “Land suitability: technical methods. A technical report to the Australian Government for the Flinders and Gilbert Agricultural Resource Assessment (FGARA) project”.

  10. f

    Establishment and validation of the evaluation models.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lulu Gao; Xicun Zhu; Cheng Li; Lizhen Cheng (2023). Establishment and validation of the evaluation models. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186751.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Lulu Gao; Xicun Zhu; Cheng Li; Lizhen Cheng
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Establishment and validation of the evaluation models.

  11. d

    Data from: Global taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of bees...

    • dataone.org
    • search.dataone.org
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nicolas Leclercq; Leon Marshall; Timothy Weekers; Parthiba Basu; David Benda; Danilo Bevk; Ritam Bhattacharya; Petr Bogusch; Anna BontÅ¡utÅ¡naja; Laura Bortolotti; Nathalie Cabirol; Eduardo Calderón-Uraga; Rafael Carvalho; Silvia Castro; Soumik Chatterjee; Mariana De La Cruz Alquicira; Joachim R. de Miranda; Tara Dirilgen; Achik Dorchin; Kinley Dorji; Bianca Drepper; Simone Flaminio; Janis Gailis; Marta Galloni; Hugo Gaspar; Mary W. Gikungu; Bjorn Arild Hatteland; Alejandro Hinojosa-Diaz; Lucie Hostinská; Brad G. Howlett; Keng-Lou James Hung; Louise Hutchinson; Rafaela Oliveira Jesus; Nameda Karklina; Muhammad Sohail Khan; João Loureiro; Xingyuan Men; Jean-Marc Molenberg; Sonja Mudri-Stojnić; Petar Nikolic; Etienne Normandin; Julia Osterman; Fang Ouyang; Asne S. Oygarden; Laura Ozolina-Pole; Niks Ozols; Andrea Parra Saldivar; Robert J. Paxton; Theresa Pitts-Singer; Katja Poveda; Kit Prendergast; Marino Quaranta; Samantha F.J. Read; Stefanie Reinhardt; Marcelo Rojas-Oropeza; Carlos Ruiz; Maj Rundlöf; Achia Sade; Christine Sandberg; Fabio Sgolastra; Syed Fahad Shah; Mohammed A. Shebl; Villu Soon; Dara A. Stanley; Jakub Straka; Panagiotis Theodorou; EstefanÃa Tobajas; Jessica L. Vaca-Uribe; Alejandro Vera; Cristian Villagra; Mary-Kate Williams; Marina Wolowski; Thomas J. Wood; Zhuo Yan; QingQing Zhang; Nicolas J. Vereecken (2025). Global taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of bees in apple orchards [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cfxpnvxb8
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 27, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad Digital Repository
    Authors
    Nicolas Leclercq; Leon Marshall; Timothy Weekers; Parthiba Basu; David Benda; Danilo Bevk; Ritam Bhattacharya; Petr Bogusch; Anna Bontšutšnaja; Laura Bortolotti; Nathalie Cabirol; Eduardo Calderón-Uraga; Rafael Carvalho; Silvia Castro; Soumik Chatterjee; Mariana De La Cruz Alquicira; Joachim R. de Miranda; Tara Dirilgen; Achik Dorchin; Kinley Dorji; Bianca Drepper; Simone Flaminio; Janis Gailis; Marta Galloni; Hugo Gaspar; Mary W. Gikungu; Bjorn Arild Hatteland; Alejandro Hinojosa-Diaz; Lucie Hostinská; Brad G. Howlett; Keng-Lou James Hung; Louise Hutchinson; Rafaela Oliveira Jesus; Nameda Karklina; Muhammad Sohail Khan; João Loureiro; Xingyuan Men; Jean-Marc Molenberg; Sonja Mudri-Stojnić; Petar Nikolic; Etienne Normandin; Julia Osterman; Fang Ouyang; Asne S. Oygarden; Laura Ozolina-Pole; Niks Ozols; Andrea Parra Saldivar; Robert J. Paxton; Theresa Pitts-Singer; Katja Poveda; Kit Prendergast; Marino Quaranta; Samantha F.J. Read; Stefanie Reinhardt; Marcelo Rojas-Oropeza; Carlos Ruiz; Maj Rundlöf; Achia Sade; Christine Sandberg; Fabio Sgolastra; Syed Fahad Shah; Mohammed A. Shebl; Villu Soon; Dara A. Stanley; Jakub Straka; Panagiotis Theodorou; Estefanía Tobajas; Jessica L. Vaca-Uribe; Alejandro Vera; Cristian Villagra; Mary-Kate Williams; Marina Wolowski; Thomas J. Wood; Zhuo Yan; QingQing Zhang; Nicolas J. Vereecken
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2023
    Description

    An essential prerequisite to safeguard pollinator species is characterisation of the multifaceted diversity of crop pollinators and identification of the drivers of pollinator community changes across biogeographical gradients. The extent to which intensive agriculture is associated with the homogenisation of biological communities at large spatial scales remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated diversity drivers for 644 bee species/morphospecies in 177 commercial apple orchards across 33 countries and four global biogeographical biomes. Our findings reveal significant taxonomic dissimilarity among biogeographical zones. Interestingly, despite this dissimilarity, species from different zones share similar higher-level phylogenetic groups and similar ecological and behavioural traits (i.e. functional traits), likely due to habitat filtering caused by perennial monoculture systems managed intensively for crop production. Honey bee species dominated orchard communities, wh..., During the apple blooming season in 2019 (except Bhutan in 2020), we surveyed 177 commercial apple orchards in 33 countries covering six continents following a strict and standardised protocol combining netting and pan trapping (3 days). This datasets represents the all community matrix used in the article "Global taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of bees in apple orchards. Each site was sampled for three days (consecutive if weather permitting) during the peak blooming period. Netting collection incorporated surveying all bee specimens seen directly visiting the blossoms over two 90 min sessions (morning and afternoon) per day, while walking through orchard rows. Passive sampling consisted of deploying of painted pan traps at 9 h00 each day, in three trios (fluorescent yellow, fluorescent blue, and white) on cleared ground. The pan traps were filled with soapy water and were collected at 4 h00. Allpan traps were painted at the Agroecology Lab (ULB, Belgium) then dispatc..., Csv file, This README file was generated on 2023-08-10 by Nicolas Leclercq.

    GENERAL INFORMATION

    1. Title of Dataset: Global taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity of bees in apple orchards

    2. Author Information A. Principal Author Contact Information Name: Nicolas Vereecken Institution: Universit Libre de Bruxelles Email:

      B. Associate Author Contact Information Name: Nicolas Leclercq Institution: Universit Libre de Bruxelles Email:

    3. Date of data collection : 2019 (2020 for Bhutan)

    4. Geographic location of data collection: World

    SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION

    1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain

    2. Links to publications that cite or use the data:

    N. Leclercq, L. Marshall, T. Weekers, P. Basu, D. Benda, D. Bevk, R. Bhattacharya, P. Bogusch, A. Bontutnaja, L. Bortolotti, N. Cabirol, E. Caldern-Uraga, R. Carvalho, S. Castro, S. Chatterjee, M. De La Cruz Alquicira, J.R. de Miranda, T. Dirilgen...

  12. f

    Support vector machine regression model parameters.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lulu Gao; Xicun Zhu; Cheng Li; Lizhen Cheng (2023). Support vector machine regression model parameters. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186751.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Lulu Gao; Xicun Zhu; Cheng Li; Lizhen Cheng
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Support vector machine regression model parameters.

  13. o

    Solution structure ensemble of the two N-terminal apple domains (residues...

    • bmrb.protein.osaka-u.ac.jp
    • bmrb.io
    Updated Feb 15, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    J. Marchant; B. Cowper; Y. Liu; L. Lai; C. Pinzan; J. Marq; N. Friedrich; K. Sawmynaden; W. Chai; R. Childs; S. Saouros; P. Simpson; M. Barreira; T. Feizi; D. Soldati-favre; Stephen Matthews (2013). Solution structure ensemble of the two N-terminal apple domains (residues 58-231) of Toxoplasma gondii microneme protein 4 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.13018/BMR18039
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2013
    Dataset provided by
    Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank
    Authors
    J. Marchant; B. Cowper; Y. Liu; L. Lai; C. Pinzan; J. Marq; N. Friedrich; K. Sawmynaden; W. Chai; R. Childs; S. Saouros; P. Simpson; M. Barreira; T. Feizi; D. Soldati-favre; Stephen Matthews
    Description

    Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank Entry 18039: Solution structure ensemble of the two N-terminal apple domains (residues 58-231) of Toxoplasma gondii microneme protein 4

  14. f

    Characteristics of the nitrogen concentration of the samples.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lulu Gao; Xicun Zhu; Cheng Li; Lizhen Cheng (2023). Characteristics of the nitrogen concentration of the samples. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186751.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Lulu Gao; Xicun Zhu; Cheng Li; Lizhen Cheng
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Characteristics of the nitrogen concentration of the samples.

  15. TSMC R&D expenditure 2018-2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). TSMC R&D expenditure 2018-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1177830/taiwan-semiconductor-manufacturing-company-research-and-development-expenditures/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Taiwan
    Description

    In 2024, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) spent over *** billion New Taiwan dollars on research and development. As a global semiconductor market leader, TSMC has been a crucial supplier to many huge consumer electronics corporations like Apple. Advantage through segmentation TSMC is a foundry and therefore only focuses on the production of semiconductors. The supply chain of integrated circuits is segmented into different production steps. So-called fabless companies design the chip layout and manage the sales process. They contract foundries, which only operate in the manufacturing part of the supply chain. The advantage for TSMC as a foundry is that the company can focus its research and development efforts on the improvement of the manufacturing process and the capabilities of the components. Supplying the world TSMC is the largest semiconductor manufacturer in the world’s largest semiconductor-producing region. While most fabless companies are located in the United States, Taiwan accounts for the largest share of semiconductor foundry revenue worldwide. TSMC is not only the largest foundry in Taiwan, but also globally as the company generates over half of the global foundry revenue.

  16. f

    Data from: Photosynthetic pigments, photochemical efficiency and growth of...

    • figshare.com
    jpeg
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eliene A. Fernandes; Lauriane A. dos A. Soares; Geovani S. de Lima; Hans R. Gheyi; Reginaldo G. Nobre; Pedro D. Fernandes (2023). Photosynthetic pigments, photochemical efficiency and growth of custard-apple under salt stress and potassium fertilization [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20017966.v1
    Explore at:
    jpegAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    SciELO journals
    Authors
    Eliene A. Fernandes; Lauriane A. dos A. Soares; Geovani S. de Lima; Hans R. Gheyi; Reginaldo G. Nobre; Pedro D. Fernandes
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    ABSTRACT The salt stress caused by irrigation water with high concentration of salts stands out as one of the main limiting factors in agricultural production in the semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil. In this context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the photosynthetic pigments, the photochemical efficiency, and the growth of custard-apple irrigated with saline water and potassium doses. The research was carried out under field conditions in a randomized block design in a 2 × 5 factorial scheme, corresponding to two values of electrical conductivity of irrigation water - ECw (1.3 and 4.0 dS m-1) and five potassium doses (50, 75, 100, 125 and 150% of the recommendation). The dose referring to 100% corresponded to the application of 20 g of K2O per plant per year. ECw of 4.0 dS m-1 reduced the synthesis of chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids in custard-apple, at 245 days after transplanting. Fertilization doses of 50 to 150% of the recommendation inhibited the synthesis of chlorophyll b and the absolute and relative growth rates in stem diameter of custard-apple plants irrigated with water of highest electrical conductivity. Reduction in the quantum efficiency of photosystem II in custard-apple cultivated under ECw of 4.0 dS m-1 is related to photoinhibitory damage to photosystem II. Potassium fertilization did not alleviate the stress caused by water salinity on the growth of custard-apple, during 151-245 days after transplantation.

  17. f

    Table 1_Feasibility, adherence and usability of an observational digital...

    • figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Apr 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    B. Brady; S. Zhou; D. Ashworth; L. Zheng; R. Eramudugolla; K. J. Anstey (2025). Table 1_Feasibility, adherence and usability of an observational digital health study built using Apple’s ResearchKit among adults aged 18–84 years.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1520971.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 29, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    B. Brady; S. Zhou; D. Ashworth; L. Zheng; R. Eramudugolla; K. J. Anstey
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    ObjectiveThis study evaluated the Labs Without Walls app and paired Apple Watch devices for remote research among Australian adults aged 18–84.MethodsThe study app, built using Apple's open-source ResearchKit frameworks, uses a multi-timescale measurement burst design over 8-weeks. Participants downloaded the app, completed tasks over 8 weeks, and wore Apple Watch devices. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, remote consent, and data collection without training. Adherence was measured by task completion rates. Usability was assessed by response times, a post-study survey, and qualitative feedback.Results228 participants (mean age 53, age range 18–84; 62.7% female) were recruited nationwide, consented remotely, and provided data. 201 (88.16%) completed the 8-week protocol. Task adherence ranged from 100% to 70.61%. Health, environmental, and sleep data were collected passively. Usability feedback was excellent, with 84% rating the app as “extremely” or “a lot” user-friendly, 88% finding alert frequency “just right,” and 95.7% finding the schedule manageable. Few age or sex differences were found.ConclusionsThe Labs Without Walls app and paired Apple Watch devices are user-friendly and enable adults aged 18–84 to complete surveys, cognitive and sensory tasks, and provide passive health and environmental data. The app can be used without formal training by males and females living in Australia, including older adults. Future iterations should consider gamification and strategies to improve daily-diary survey user experience.

  18. f

    Data_Sheet_1_Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Allocation, and Remobilization in...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bi Zheng Tan; Dugald C. Close; Peter R. Quin; Nigel D. Swarts (2023). Data_Sheet_1_Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Allocation, and Remobilization in Apple Trees: Uptake Is Optimized With Pre-harvest N Supply.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.657070.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Bi Zheng Tan; Dugald C. Close; Peter R. Quin; Nigel D. Swarts
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Optimizing the utilization of applied nitrogen (N) in fruit trees requires N supply that is temporally matched to tree demand. We investigated how the timing of N application affected uptake, allocation, and remobilization within 14-year-old “Gala”/M26 apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh) over two seasons. In the 2017–2018 season, 30 g N tree−1 of 5.5 atom% 15N–calcium nitrate was applied by weekly fertigation in four equal doses, commencing either 4 weeks after full bloom (WAFB) (pre-harvest) or 1-week post-harvest, or fortnightly, divided between pre- and post-harvest (50:50 split). Nitrogen uptake derived from fertilizer (NDF) was monitored by leaf sampling before whole trees were destructively harvested at dormancy of the first season to quantify N uptake and allocation and at fruit harvest of the second season to quantify the remobilization of NDF. The uptake efficiency of applied N fertilizer (NUpE) was significantly higher from pre-harvest (32.0%) than from the other treatments (~17%). The leaf NDF concentration, an indicator of N uptake, increased concomitantly only when pre-harvest N was applied. Pre-harvest treated trees allocated more than half of the NDF into fruit and leaves and stored the same amount of NDF into perennial organs as the post-harvest treatment. Subsequent spring remobilization of NDF was not affected by the timing of N fertigation from the previous season. A seasonal effect of remobilization was observed with a decrease in root N status and a reciprocal increase in branch N status at fruit harvest of season two. These findings represent a shift in the understanding of dynamics of N use in mature deciduous trees and indicate that current fertilizer strategies need to be adjusted from post-harvest to primarily pre-harvest N application to optimize N use efficiency. This approach can provide adequate storage N to support early spring growth the following season with no detriment to fruit quality.

  19. Gastos mundiales de Apple en investigación y desarrollo 2007-2024

    • es.statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Gastos mundiales de Apple en investigación y desarrollo 2007-2024 [Dataset]. https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/552700/gastos-de-apple-en-investigacion-y-desarrollo-mundial/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2007 - 2024
    Area covered
    Mundial
    Description

    Apple apostó por invertir fuertemente en I+D durante todo el periodo de estudio, como lo demuestra el hecho de que los gastos en investigación y desarrollo casi se duplicaran en el último sexenio. Así pues, 2024 concluyó con una inversión en I+D superior a los ****** millones de dólares estadounidenses.

  20. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). Apple: expenditure on research and development 2007-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/273006/apple-expenses-for-research-and-development/
Organization logo

Apple: expenditure on research and development 2007-2024

Explore at:
10 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jun 25, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

Apple Inc. spent a record **** billion U.S. dollars on research and development in its 2024 fiscal year, increasing by about *** billion from its 2023 total. The company’s massive research and development budget over the years has led to the release of various famous products including the iPhone, iPod, MacBook, and iPad. In 2024, the company released their first VR headset, the Apple Vision Pro. Apple Inc. Since its famous beginning in a garage in California, Apple has grown into a tech industry giant, today holding the title of the world’s most valuable brand. The company released over a dozen new products in 2023, with new generations of its iPhone, Apple Watch, and iPad being released. In addition to its consumer electronics products, the company develops a variety of software packages, applications, web browsers, and more recently, cloud technology offerings. On November 1, 2019, with the official launch of its ambitious Apple TV+, Apple also entered the over-the-top media service market, albeit late to the already competitive game. Apple’s massive range of compatible products and software bring in hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue each year and made it the first public company whose market value reaches the ****trillion U.S. dollar landmark.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu