Succeeds and combines earlier versions of the tools - Topography Toolbox for ArcGIS 9.x - http://arcscripts.esri.com/details.asp?dbid=15996Riparian Topography Toolbox for calculating Height Above River and Height Above Nearest Drainage - http://arcscripts.esri.com/details.asp?dbid=16792PRISM Data Helper - http://arcscripts.esri.com/details.asp?dbid=15976Tools:UplandBeer’s AspectMcCune and Keon Heat Load IndexLandform ClassifcationPRISM Data HelperSlope Position ClassificationSolar Illumination IndexTopographic Convergence/Wetness IndexTopographic Position IndexRiparianDerive Stream Raster using Cost DistanceHeight Above Nearest DrainageHeight Above RiverMiscellaneousMoving Window Correlation

NOTE: An updated Introduction to ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Tutorial is available here. It is recommended you use the new tutorial for getting started with GeoEvent Server. The old Introduction Tutorial available on this page is relevant for 10.8.x and earlier and will not be updated.The Introduction to GeoEvent Server Tutorial (10.8.x and earlier) introduces you to the Real-Time Visualization and Analytic capabilities of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server. GeoEvent Server allows you to:

Incorporate real-time data feeds in your existing GIS data and IT infrastructure. Perform continuous processing and analysis on streaming data, as it is received. Produce new streams of data that can be leveraged across the ArcGIS system.

Once you have completed the exercises in this tutorial you should be able to:

Use ArcGIS GeoEvent Manager to monitor and perform administrative tasks. Create and maintain GeoEvent Service elements such as inputs, outputs, and processors. Use GeoEvent Simulator to simulate event data into GeoEvent Server. Configure GeoEvent Services to append and update features in a published feature service. Work with processors and filters to enhance and direct GeoEvents from event data.

The knowledge gained from this tutorial will prepare you for other GeoEvent Server tutorials available in the ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Gallery.

Releases

Each release contains a tutorial compatible with the version of GeoEvent Server listed. The release of the component you deploy does not have to match your version of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server, so long as the release of the component is compatible with the version of GeoEvent Server you are using. For example, if the release contains a tutorial for version 10.6; this tutorial is compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.6 and later. Each release contains a Release History document with a compatibility table that illustrates which versions of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server the component is compatible with.

NOTE: The release strategy for ArcGIS GeoEvent Server components delivered in the ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Gallery has been updated. Going forward, a new release will only be created when

  a component has an issue,
  is being enhanced with new capabilities,
  or is not compatible with newer versions of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server.

This strategy makes upgrades of these custom
components easier since you will not have to
upgrade them for every version of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server
unless there is a new release of
the component. The documentation for the
latest release has been
updated and includes instructions for updating
your configuration to align with this strategy.

Latest

Release 7 - March 30, 2018 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.6 and later.

Previous

Release 6 - January 12, 2018 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.5 thru 10.8.

Release 5 - July 30, 2016 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.4 thru 10.8.

Release 4 - July 30, 2015 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.3.x.

Release 3 - April 24, 2015 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.3.x. Not available.

Release 2 - January 22, 2015 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.3.x. Not available.

Release 1 - April 11, 2014 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.2.x.

The Seabed Landform Classification Toolset is a GIS toolbox designed to classify seabed landforms on continental and island shelf settings. The user is guided through a series of classification steps within an ArcGIS toolbox to classify prominent seabed features termed ‘seabed landforms’, which characterise the morphology of the seabed surface. Seabed landforms include reefs/banks, peaks, plains, scarps, channels and depressions. Plain areas can additionally be classified into high and low features at localised and broad scales to capture features within plain surfaces. Common variables for seabed classification are utilised, including slope, bathymetric position index and ruggedness, and a series of procedures are applied to identify reef outcrops and minimise noise. The classification approach applies a whole-seascape classification which is aimed to offer a flexible and user-friendly approach to extract key seabed features from high-resolution shelf bathymetry data.

This toolset was developed using ESRI ArcGIS Desktop 10.8 and requires an Advanced licence with Spatial Analyst and 3D Analyst and extensions. It utilises scripts within the Benthic Terrain Modeler toolset (Walbridge et al. 2018) and Geomorphometry and Gradients Metrics Toolbox (Evans et al., 2014).

Please read the User Guide and supporting documentation for information on how to run the toolset. A web explainer is available at: https://arcg.is/1Tqmv50

The Seabed Landform Classification Toolset is also available for download on GitHub (https://github.com/LinklaterM/Seabed-Landforms-Classification-Toolset/).

The toolset was developed by the Coastal and Marine Team, NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (formerly NSW Department of Planning and Environment), funded by NSW Climate Change Fund through the Coastal Management Funding Package and the Marine Estate Management Authority.

Please cite this toolset as: Linklater, M, Morris, B.D. and Hanslow, D.J. (2023) Classification of seabed landforms on continental and island shelves. Frontiers of Marine Science, 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1258556.

Other toolsets utilised by the Seabed Landform Classification Toolset include: Benthic Terrain Modeler: Walbridge, S., Slocum, N., Pobuda, M., and Wright, D. J. (2018). Unified geomorphological analysis workflows with Benthic Terrain Modeler. Geosciences 8, 94. Geomorphometry and Gradients Metrics Toolbox: Evans, J., Oakleaf, J., and Cushman, S. (2014). An ArcGIS Toolbox for Surface Gradient and Geomorphometric Modeling, Version 2.0-0. https://github.com/jeffreyevans/GradientMetrics.

Map package generated in ArcGIS 10.8.1 to match go along with Ferguson et al., (2022), published in JGR-Planets.

This template is used to compute urban growth between two land cover datasets, that are classified into 20 classes based on the Anderson Level II classification system. This raster function template is used to generate a visual representation indicating urbanization across two different time periods. Typical datasets used for this template is the National Land Cover Database. A more detailed blog on the datasets can be found on ArcGIS Blogs. This template works in ArcGIS Pro Version 2.6 and higher. It's designed to work on Enterprise 10.8.1 and higher.References:Raster functionsWhen to use this raster function templateThe template is useful to generate an intuitive visualization of urbanization across two images.Sample Images to test this againstNLCD2006 and NLCD2011How to use this raster function templateIn ArcGIS Pro, search ArcGIS Living Atlas for raster function templates to apply them to your imagery layer. You can also download the raster function template, attach it to a mosaic dataset, and publish it as an image service. The output is a visual representation of urban sprawl across two images. Applicable geographiesThe template is designed to work globally.

Map Package containing all layers used for the mapping presented in the paper by Ferguson et al., (2023) in Earth and Planetary Science Letters for Mimas. Should there be an issue with a mosaic not loading properly, please reach out to me at sierra.ferguson @ swri . org.

Use the Attachment Viewer template to provide an app for users to explore a layer's features and review attachments with the option to update attribute data. Present your images, videos, and PDF files collected using ArcGIS Field Maps or ArcGIS Survey123 workflows. Choose an attachment-focused layout to display individual images beside your map or a map-focused layout to highlight your map next to a gallery of images. Examples: Review photos collected during emergency response damage inspections. Display the results of field data collection and support downloading images for inclusion in a report. Present a map of land parcel along with associated documents stored as attachments. Data requirements The Attachment Viewer template requires a feature layer with attachments. It includes the capability to view attachments of a hosted feature service or an ArcGIS Server feature service (10.8 or later). Currently, the app can display JPEG, JPG, PNG, GIF, MP4, QuickTime (.mov), and PDF files in the viewer window. All other attachment types are displayed as a link. Key app capabilities App layout - Choose between an attachment-focused layout, which displays one attachment at a time in the main panel of the app with the map on the side, or a map-focused layout, which displays the map in the main panel of the app with a gallery of attachments. Feature selection - Allows users to select features in the map and view associated attachments. Review data - Enable tools to review and update existing records. Zoom, pan, download images - Allow users to interact with and download attachments. Language switcher - Provide translations for custom text and create a multilingual app. Home, Zoom controls, Legend, Layer List, Search Supportability This web app is designed responsively to be used in browsers on desktops, mobile phones, and tablets. We are committed to ongoing efforts towards making our apps as accessible as possible. Please feel free to leave a comment on how we can improve the accessibility of our apps for those who use assistive technologies.

Data for "A Preliminary Regional Geomorphologic Map in Utopia Planitia of the Tianwen-1 Zhurong Landing Region" is a collection of the files used in the associated publication for this dataset. This presents the dataset used for developing an initial geomorphologic map of the landing region of the Zhurong rover from the Tianwen-1 spacecraft.Description of each item:ArcMap Data: This folder contains two subfolders: Features and Units. Each folder contains ArcMap 10.8 shapefiles and data that must be linked with the UtopiaPlanitia_22N26N_108E112E_GeomorphologicMap.mxd map file.Concentric Graben Thickness Estimates Data.txt: This file contains all measurements used in the calculations of material cover thicknesses for concentric grabens in the associated publication for this dataset.Figures: These figures are those in the publication for this dataset, in .jpg format.List of Basemap Images.txt: This file is a list of the publicly available images used as basemap images in mapping.UtopiaPlanitia_22N26N_108E112E_GeomorphologicMap.mxd: This is the ArcMap 10.8 map file. It needs to be linked with the ArcMap Data folder to access the mapped feature classes. It also needs to be linked with image files, if any listed in "List of Basemap Images.txt" (downloaded separately).For inquiries regarding the contents of this dataset, please contact the Corresponding Author listed in the README.txt file. Administrative inquiries (e.g., removal requests, trouble downloading, etc.) can be directed to data-management@arizona.edu

A Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) is issued by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), and authorizes a utility to provide water and/or sewer service to a specific service area. The CCN obligates the water or sewer retail public utility to provide continuous and adequate service to every customer who requests service in that area. The maps and digital data provided in the Water and Sewer CCN Viewer delineate the official CCN service areas and CCN facility lines issued by the PUCT and its predecessor agencies. This dataset is a Texas statewide polygon layer of sewer CCN service areas. The CCNs were digitized from Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) county mylar maps. The mylar maps were the base maps on which the CCNs were originally drawn and maintained. CCNs are currently created and maintained using digitizing methods, coordinate geography or imported from digital files submitted by the applicant. TxDOT digital county urban road files are used as the base maps on which the CCNs are geo-referenced. It is best to view the sewer CCN service area data in conjunction with the sewer CCN facility line data, since these two layers together represent all of the retail public sewer utilities in Texas.*Important Notes: The CCN spatial dataset and metadata were last updated on: January 29, 2024The official state-wide CCN spatial dataset includes all types of CCN services areas: water and sewer CCN service areas; water and sewer CCN facility lines. This CCN spatial dataset is updated on a quarterly, or as needed basis using Geographic Information System (GIS) software called ArcGIS 10.8.2.The complete state-wide CCN spatial dataset is available for download from the following website: http://www.puc.texas.gov/industry/water/utilities/gis.aspxThe Water and Sewer CCN Viewer may be accessed from the following web site: http://www.puc.texas.gov/industry/water/utilities/map.htmlIf you have questions about this CCN spatial dataset or about CCN mapping requirements, please e-mail CCN Mapping Staff: water@puc.texas.govTYPE - Indicates whether a CCN is considered a water or a sewer system. If the CCN number begins with a '"1", the CCN is considered a water system (utility). If a CCN number begins with a "2", the CCN is considered a sewer system (utility).CCN_NO - A unique five-digit number assigned to each CCN when it is created and approved by the Commission. *CCN number starting with an ‘N’ indicates an exempt utility.UTILITY - The name of the utility which owns the CCN.COUNTY - The name(s) of the county(ies) in which the CCN exist.CCN_TYPE –One of three types:Bounded Service Area: A certificated service area with closed boundaries that often follow identifiable physical and cultural features such as roads, rivers, streams and political boundaries. Facilities +200 Feet: A certificated service area represented by lines. They include a buffer of a specified number of feet (usually 200 feet). The lines normally follow along roads and may or may not correspond to distribution lines or facilities in the ground.Facilities Only: A certificated service area represented by lines. They are granted for a "point of use" that covers only the customer connections at the time the CCN is granted. Facility only service lines normally follow along roads and may or may not correspond to distribution lines or facilities in the ground.STATUS – For pending dockets check the PUC Interchange Filing Search

The Spatiotemporal Big Data Store Tutorial introduces you the the capabilities of the spatiotemporal big data store in ArcGIS Data Store, available with ArcGIS Enterprise. Observation data can be moving objects, changing attributes of stationary sensors, or both. The spatiotemporal big data store enables archival of high volume observation data, sustains high velocity write throughput, and can run across multiple machines (nodes). Adding additional machines adds capacity, enabling you to store more data, implement longer retention policies of your data, and support higher data write throughput.

After completing this tutorial you will:

Understand the concepts and best practices for working with the spatiotemporal big data store available with ArcGIS Data Store. Have configured the appropriate security settings and certificates on a enterprise server, real-time server, and a data server which are necessary for working with the spatiotemporal big data store. Have learned how to process and archive large amounts of observational data in the spatiotemporal big data store. Have learned how to visualize the observational data that is stored in the spatiotemporal big data store.

Releases

Each release contains a tutorial compatible with the version of GeoEvent Server listed. The release of the component you deploy does not have to match your version of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server, so long as the release of the component is compatible with the version of GeoEvent Server you are using. For example, if the release contains a tutorial for version 10.6; this tutorial is compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.6 and later. Each release contains a Release History document with a compatibility table that illustrates which versions of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server the component is compatible with.

NOTE: The release strategy for ArcGIS GeoEvent Server components delivered in the ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Gallery has been updated. Going forward, a new release will only be created when

  a component has an issue,
  is being enhanced with new capabilities,
  or is not compatible with newer versions of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server.

This strategy makes upgrades of these custom
components easier since you will not have to
upgrade them for every version of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server
unless there is a new release of
the component. The documentation for the
latest release has been
updated and includes instructions for updating
your configuration to align with this strategy.

Latest

Release 4 - February 2, 2017 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.5 and later.

Previous

Release 3 - July 7, 2016 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.4 thru 10.8.

Release 2 - May 17, 2016 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.4 thru 10.8.

Release 1 - March 18, 2016 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.4 thru 10.8.

This layer shows particulate matter in the air sized 2.5 micrometers of smaller (PM 2.5). The data is aggregated from NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) gridded data into country boundaries, administrative 1 boundaries, and 50 km hex bins. The unit of measurement is micrograms per cubic meter.The layer shows the annual average PM 2.5 from 1998 to 2016, highlighting if the overall mean for an area meets the World Health Organization guideline of 10 micrograms per cubic meter annually. Areas that don't meet the guideline and are above the threshold are shown in red, and areas that are lower than the guideline are in grey.The data is averaged for each year and over the the 19 years to provide an overall picture of air quality globally. Some of the things we can learn from this layer:What is the average annual PM 2.5 value over 19 years? (1998-2016)What is the annual average PM 2.5 value for each year from 1998 to 2016?What is the statistical trend for PM 2.5 over the 19 years? (downward or upward)Are there hot spots (or cold spots) of PM 2.5 over the 19 years?How many people are impacted by the air quality in an area?What is the death rate caused by the joint effects of air pollution?Choose a different attribute to symbolize in order to reveal any of the patterns above.A space time cube was performed on a multidimensional mosaic version of the data in order to derive an emerging hot spot analysis, trends, and a 19-year average. The country and administrative 1 layers provide a population-weighted PM 2.5 value to emphasize which areas have a higher human impact. Citations:van Donkelaar, A., R. V. Martin, M. Brauer, N. C. Hsu, R. A. Kahn, R. C. Levy, A. Lyapustin, A. M. Sayer, and D. M. Winker. 2018. Global Annual PM2.5 Grids from MODIS, MISR and SeaWiFS Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) with GWR, 1998-2016. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4ZK5DQS. Accessed 1 April 2020van Donkelaar, A., R. V. Martin, M. Brauer, N. C. Hsu, R. A. Kahn, R. C. Levy, A. Lyapustin, A. M. Sayer, and D. M. Winker. 2016. Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter Using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites. Environmental Science & Technology 50 (7): 3762-3772. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05833.Boundaries and population figures:Antarctica is excluded from all maps because it was not included in the original NASA grids.50km hex bins generated using the Generate Tessellation tool - projected to Behrmann Equal Area projection for analysesPopulation figures generated using Zonal Statistics from the World Population Estimate 2016 layer from ArcGIS Living Atlas.Administrative boundaries from World Administrative Divisions layer from ArcGIS Living Atlas - projected to Behrmann Equal Area projection for analyses and hosted in Web MercatorSources: Garmin, CIA World FactbookPopulation figures generated using Zonal Statistics from the World Population Estimate 2016 layer from ArcGIS Living Atlas.Country boundaries from Esri 2019 10.8 Data and Maps - projected to Behrmann Equal Area projection for analyses and hosted in Web Mercator. Sources: Garmin, Factbook, CIAPopulation figures attached to the country boundaries come from the World Population Estimate 2016 Sources Living Atlas layer Data processing notes:NASA's GeoTIFF files for 19 years (1998-2016) were first brought into ArcGIS Pro 2.5.0 and put into a multidimensional mosaic dataset.For each geography level, the following was performed: Zonal Statistics were run against the mosaic as a multidimensional layer.A Space Time Cube was created to compare the 19 years of PM 2.5 values and detect hot/cold spot patterns. To learn more about Space Time Cubes, visit this page.The Space Time Cube is processed for Emerging Hot Spots where we gain the trends and hot spot results.The layers are hosted in Web Mercator Auxillary Sphere projection, but were processed using an equal area projection: Behrmann. If using this layer for analysis, it is recommended to start by projecting the data back to Behrmann.The country and administrative layer were dissolved and joined with population figures in order to visualize human impact.The dissolve tool ensures that each geographic area is only symbolized once within the map.Country boundaries were generalized post-analysis for visualization purposes. The tolerance used was 700m. If performing analysis with this layer, find detailed country boundaries in ArcGIS Living Atlas. To create the population-weighted attributes on the country and Admin 1 layers, the hex value population values were used to create the weighting. Within each hex bin, the total population figure and average PM 2.5 were multiplied.The hex bins were converted into centroids and the PM2.5 and population figures were summarized within the country and Admin 1 boundaries.The summation of the PM 2.5 values were then divided by the total population of each geography. This population value was determined by summarizing the population values from the hex bins within each geography.Some artifacts in the hex bin layer as a result of the input NASA rasters. Because the gridded surface is created from multiple satellites, there are strips within some areas that are a result of satellite paths. Some areas also have more of a continuous pattern between hex bins as a result of the input rasters.Within the country layer, an air pollution attributable death rate is included. 2016 figures are offered by the World Health Organization (WHO). Values are offered as a mean, upper value, lower value, and also offered as age standardized. Values are for deaths caused by all possible air pollution related diseases, for both sexes, and all age groups. For more information visit this page, and here for methodology. According to WHO, the world average was 95 deaths per 100,000 people.To learn the techniques used in this analysis, visit the Learn ArcGIS lesson Investigate Pollution Patterns with Space-Time Analysis by Esri's Kevin Bulter and Lynne Buie.

This layer shows 194 World Health Organization Member States as listed here. These are as of September 2020. Layer is symbolized by WHO region.The World Health Organization (WHO) is the directing and coordinating authority on international health within the United Nations system. For more information about the regions shown in this map, visit this page.Country boundaries from Esri 2019 10.8 Data and Maps - hosted in Web Mercator and generalized to 700m. Sources: Garmin, Facebook, CIA

Det digitale jordartskort viser overfladegeologien i digital form. I denne version 7.0 fra 2023 er 93% af Danmarks landareal klassificeret, og kortet kompletteres løbende. Kortet er et resultat af den systematiske geologiske kortlægning af Danmark. Informationerne er indsamlet ved feltarbejde, hvor jordprøver udtages ved hjælp af et hånsspyd i ca.1 meters dybde, det vil sige lige under pløjelag og jordbundsudviklingen. Afstanden mellem jordprøverne er 100-200 meter. Jordarterne er inddelt i 82 typer. Kort- og jordartsbeskrivelsen er udgivet i GEUS rapport 2023/29, hvor yderligere oplysninger kan findes. Datapakken indeholder filer til brug i GIS systemerne ArcGIS v. 10.8.2, ArcGISPro version 3.2 og QGIS v. 3.28.4.

The map package files (merged.mpk) were prepared and can be opened by Arc Gis 10.8.2 and above versions. The map package data files include the SAR data (RISAT-1 from ISRO-Bhoonidhi) in HH,HV- polarizations, DEM ( USGS ) and IRS LISS III (Bhuvan-NRSC) data with the 30m spatial resolution were downloaded from the respective websites. Geology data in 1:50,000 scale is downloaded from GSI Bhukosh. The resolution merged data of Optical and SAR data has been prepared using Brovey transform in ERDAS 2015 software. The output file have advantages of both optical and microwave features. Extracted the Lineaments(.shp) from the coupled data of merged SAR and improved and verified with the DEM, Optical, SAR and Geology data sets. All these data generation and Statistical calculation done with the help of ArcGIS software. ArcGIS guide will help to create shape files, Attribute table calculations of length, classification. Azumutal trend calculations of each lineaments done using Split lines and other geometric calculations giving the trend of each lineament and finally export the map (All .jpg files). Rose diagrams was prepared based on the trend of lineaments with the help of Rockworks 17 software. The generated Azimuthal trend data in lineament shape file can be import to linears - utilites - Rose diagram. I was prepared Rose diagram of different class of lineaments using frequency calculation method. Lineaments are the linear geological features can extend from few meters to hundreds of kms. Geologically lineaments are either structural or stratigraphical, typically it will comprise fault, fold axis, bedding contacts, dyke intrusions, shear zone or a straight coast line. Mapping lineaments using remote sensing is economical, faster can act as a preliminary study. Generally lineaments have been mapped using the optical remote sensing data such as Landsat, Resourcesat etc. For India, Lineaments were mapped using the LISS III and LISS IV of Resourcesat-1 & 2 at a scale of 1:50k. However in tropical region like India, limited exposure of ground due to vegetation cover, lineaments may go unnoticed in optical remote sensing data. This problem can be overcome by Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data, which can penetrate ground significantly. With the launch of RISAT-1satelite, data availability of SAR data is immense for Indian region. Aim of this study to explore the SAR data and merged SAR and optical data for lineament mapping.

Although miniaturized data loggers allow new insights into avian migration, incomplete knowledge of basic patterns persists, especially for nightjars. Using GPS data loggers, this study examined migration ecology of the Eastern whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferus), across three migration strategies: flyover, short-stay, and long-stay. We documented migration movements, conducted hotspot analyses, quantified land cover within 1-km and 5-km buffers at used and available locations, and modeled habitat selection during migration. From 2018-2020 we captured breeding whip-poor-wills from three study sites in Massachusetts and programmed GPS tags to collect data during fall and spring migration periods. Across 19 individual males (nine of them with repeated years of data), GPS tags collected 479 locations, where 30% were classified as flyover points, 33% as short-stays, and 37% as long-stay locations. We documented seasonal flexibility in migration duration, routes, and stopover locations among individuals and between years. Analyses identified hotspot clusters in fall and spring migration in the Sierra de Tamaulipas in Mexico. Land cover at used locations differed across location types at the 5-km scale, where closed forest cover increased and crop cover decreased for flyover, short-stay, and long-stay locations, and urban cover was lowest at long-stay locations. Discrete choice modeling indicated that habitat selection by migrating whip-poor-wills differs depending on the scale and migration strategy. For example, at the 5-km scale birds avoided urban cover at long-stay locations and selected closed forest cover at short-stay locations. We suggest that whip-poor-wills may use land cover cues at large spatial scales, like 5-km, to influence rush or stay tactics during migration. Methods From 2018-2020, we captured breeding whip-poor-wills from three study sites in Massachusetts and programmed GPS tags to collect data during fall and spring migration periods. Across 19 individual males (nine of them with repeated years of data), GPS tags collected 479 locations, where 30% were classified as flyover points, 33% as short-stays, and 37% as long-stay locations. Data processing We filtered and retained migration data points when loggers connected to ≥ 4 satellites and points had dilution of precision values < 5 to ensure a 3D fix of the location (Forrest et al. 2022, Bakermans et al. 2022). Using 30-m USGS DEM (digital elevation model; http://ned.usgs.gov) data, we generated the altitude of each point by converting the GPS tags’ altitude to altitude above sea level and then subtracted the local elevation (from the DEM) from the bird’s altitude (A. Korpach, pers. communication). Next, we classified migration points based on altitude and number of points at a single location as either flyover, short-stay, or long-stay. Long-stays were locations with ≥ 2 GPS points within the same vicinity (i.e., < 10 km). Short-stay and flyovers consisted of one GPS point at a single location. We differentiated short-stay versus flyover points by altitude based on the altitudes of birds at long-stay locations (mean = 17 m, range = 121 m). Short-stays were locations with elevations < 100 m (mean = 15 m), and flyover locations had an altitude ≥ 100 m above the ground (mean = 800 m). Hotspot Analyses To identify areas of high or low use during migration, we ran an optimized hotspot analysis in ArcGIS 10.8.2 to identify statistically significant spatial clusters of high (hotspot) and low values (coldspot) of migration locations using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic (Sussman et al. 2019). This tool can “aggregate data, identify an appropriate scale of analysis, and correct for both multiple testing and spatial dependence” (ESRI 2021). Land cover classification We used ArcGIS and quantified land cover types from 2019 data using the 100-m Copernicus Global Land Service layer (Buchhorn et al. 2020). Land cover types were classified as (a) closed forest, (b) open forest, (c) shrubland, (d) herbaceous vegetation (hereafter, grassland), (e) herbaceous wetland, (f) cropland, (g) bare, (h) fresh- or saltwater, and (i) developed land (Buchhorn et al. 2020). Using the geoprocessing features of ArcMap, we quantified land cover at 5-km and 1-km circle at an actual migration location (i.e., used) and random locations (i.e., available). Habitat selection We used discrete choice modeling to determine habitat selection of Eastern whip-poor-will during migration. Discrete choice models examine the probability that an individual chooses a location based on a choice set of alternative available locations (Cooper and Millspaugh 1999). Choice sets included one used location based on the GPS fix and ten available locations. We constructed separate models for each type of migration point (i.e., flyover, short-stay, and long-stay) and spatial scale (i.e., 1 km and 5 km) with individual as a random effect. We used package jagsUI (Kellner 2021) with the software JAGS 4.3.1 (Plummer 2003).

ArcGIS Map package file to accompany Ferguson et al., 2021/22. This includes all final crater layers used to conduct the analysis. File made in ArcMap 10.8.1

This polygon dataset represents all center pivots in the central and southern High Plains (Ogallala) aquifer region of the United States. The World Imagery base-map available through the ArcGIS (version 10.8.0, Esri, CA, USA) was used as the reference for manual digitization of center pivots across the study area. This base map includes imagery obtained by GeoEye-1 and WorldView-2, -3 and -4 satellite sensors at 0.3‒0.5 m spatial resolution, which made the center pivots and their components (i.e. pivot point, main pipe, wheel tracks, and swing arms) discernable.REFERENCE

Hassani, K., S. Taghvaeian, and H. Gholizadeh. 2021. A geographical survey of center pivot irrigation systems in the Central and Southern High Plains Aquifer region of the United States. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 37(6): 1139-1145. DOI: 10.13031/aea.14693DATA DOWNLOAD: 10.13031/14707284

The information contained in this data set is a raster that represents the Fine Bathymetric Position Index (BPI_F) with an internal radius of 10 cells and an external radius of 15 cells, with which the small-scale morphological features of the study area are identified with a resolution of 200 m, with values between -117 and 165. The area covered by the data provided corresponds to the Capbreton submarine cannon system, which is proposed as a new SCI. The raw data that constitute this raster were acquired during the years 2019 and 2020, thanks to the oceanographic campaigns INTEMARES-A22C-0619, INTEMARES-A22C-0620, both on board the B/O Ramón Margalef. During 2021 and 2022 the data were processed with the latest techniques available in processing software was generated with the ArcGIS 10.8 ESRI Software through the processing of the bathymetry raster with the Benthic Terrain Modeler module. The geographical information collected is stored in a spatial database. The processing works have been financed thanks to the LIFE IP INTEMARES Project (LIFE-IP INTEMARES - Integrated, Innovative and Participatory Management for N2000 network in the Marine Environment - LIFE15 IPE/ES/000012). This integrated project has the challenge of laying the foundations to effectively manage the marine areas of the Natura 2000 Network and complete the work and progress promoted within the framework of the LIFE + INDEMARES project, which managed to take a great step in terms of declaring new areas.

IntroductionIn arid regions such as Wadi Araba, Egypt, water scarcity is a significant challenge, driven by the complex hydrogeological settings and limited field data, all while demand continues to grow for water for domestic, agricultural, and industrial needs. Additionally, the basin flows westward into the Gulf of Suez, generating a slight deltaic fan connecting inland recharge movement with coastal sedimentary and hydrological activities.MethodsThe groundwater recharge potential in Wadi Araba was mapped using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) within a GIS framework, which is the research objective. Using ArcGIS 10.8, ten thematic layers were weighted and combined to create a groundwater potential map that shows how surface, climate, and structure affect it.ResultsThe study revealed that Wadi Araba has three distinct categories of groundwater potential: low (28.45%) in the northern and southern zones, intermediate (56.9%) in the middle and western sections, and high (14.65%) in the northeastern basin near the Gulf of Suez. These patterns match up with changes in slope, soil permeability, rainfall, and the number of structural elements like drainage and lineaments. Finally, ROC -AUC analysis using 13 field-verified locations was used to check the accuracy of the derived zones, and the results indicated that the prediction accuracy was 78.7%. Accordingly, accessible sites are groundwater indicators in this arid area with few wells and springs.DiscussionThis study is the first to use an AHP-GIS-based method to map the potential for groundwater in Wadi Araba, Egypt. The results provide an excellent basis for planning sustainable groundwater use in similar arid regions with little field data.

Own data included within the dataset:

1. Orthophotomap - partially processed data, developed based on photogrammetric images captured by a drone flight in 2022. The map was generated using Agisoft Metashaper Professional software. Unit WGS84/UTM zone 33N, resolition: 0.2 m.

2. DEM - partially processed data, developed based on photogrammetric images captured by a drone flight in 2022. The map was generated using Agisoft Metashaper Professional software. Unit WGS84/UTM zone 33N, resolition: 0.2 m.

3. shp file - geomorphological and surficial geological map of the Reinodden Point. The data was generated using Agisoft Metashaper Professional software ArcGIS (ArcMap 10.8.1.). Unit WGS84/UTM zone 33N.

4. shp file - border of lake catchment. The data was generated using Global Mapper Pro v23. Unit WGS84/UTM zone 33N.

5. Sample collection location: WGS84/UTM zone 33N.