CSV Table. This table includes coded descriptions for Property Class Codes in the St. Louis County, Missouri Parcel dataset. Property Class Codes are the Tax Subclass Codes for a property. Please see field PROPCLASS in the Parcel dataset. Link to Metadata.

Summary This feature class documents the fire history on CMR from 1964 - present. This is 1 of 2 feature classes, a polygon and a point. This data has a variety of different origins which leads to differing quality of data. Within the polygon feature class, this contains perimeters that were mapped using a GPS, hand digitized, on-screen digitized, and buffered circles to the estimated acreage. These 2 files should be kept together. Within the point feature class, fires with only a location of latitude/longitude, UTM coordinate, TRS and no estimated acreage were mapped using a point location. GPS started being used in 1992 when the technology became available. Records from FMIS (Fire Management Information System) were reviewed and compared to refuge records. Polygon data in FMIS only occurs from 2012 to current and many acreage estimates did not match. This dataset includes ALL fires no matter the size. This feature class documents the fire history on CMR from 1964 - present. This is 1 of 2 feature classes, a polygon and a point. This data has a variety of different origins which leads to differing quality of data. Within the polygon feature class, this contains perimeters that were mapped using a GPS, hand digitized, on-screen digitized, and buffered circles to the estimated acreage. These 2 files should be kept together. Within the point feature class, fires with only a location of latitude/longitude, UTM coordinate, TRS and no estimated acreage were mapped using a point location. GPS started being used in 1992 when the technology became available. Data origins include: Data origins include: 1) GPS Polygon-data (Best), 2) GPS Lat/Long or UTM, 3)TRS QS, 4)TRS Point, 6)Hand digitized from topo map, 7) Circle buffer, 8)Screen digitized, 9) FMIS Lat/Long. Started compiling fire history of CMR in 2007. This has been a 10 year process.FMIS doesn't include fires polygons that are less than 10 acres. This dataset has been sent to FMIS for FMIS records to be updated with correct information. The spreadsheet contains 10-15 records without spatial information and weren't included in either feature class. Fire information from 1964 - 1980 came from records Larry Eichhorn, BLM, provided to CMR staff. Mike Granger, CMR Fire Management Officer, tracked fires on an 11x17 legal pad and all this information was brought into Excel and ArcGIS. Frequently, other information about the fires were missing which made it difficult to back track and fill in missing data. Time was spent verifiying locations that were occasionally recorded incorrectly (DMS vs DD) and converting TRS into Lat/Long and/or UTM. CMR is divided into 2 different UTM zones, zone 12 and zone 13. This occasionally caused errors in projecting. Naming conventions caused confusion. Fires are frequently names by location and there are several "Soda Creek", "Rock Creek", etc fires. Fire numbers were occasionally missing or incorrect. Fires on BLM were included if they were "Assists". Also, fires on satellite refuges and the district were also included. Acreages from GIS were compared to FMIS acres. Please see documentation in ServCat (URL) to see how these were handled.

You have been assigned a new project, which you have researched, and you have identified the data that you need.The next step is to gather, organize, and potentially create the data that you need for your project analysis.In this course, you will learn how to gather and organize data using ArcGIS Pro. You will also create a file geodatabase where you will store the data that you import and create.After completing this course, you will be able to perform the following tasks:Create a geodatabase in ArcGIS Pro.Create feature classes in ArcGIS Pro by exporting and importing data.Create a new, empty feature class in ArcGIS Pro.

Landforms are large recognizable features such as mountains, hills and plains; they are an important determinant of ecological character, habitat definition and terrain analysis. Landforms are important to the distribution of life in natural systems and are the basis for opportunities in built systems, and therefore landforms play a useful role in all natural science fields of study and planning disciplines.Dataset SummaryPhenomenon Mapped: LandformsUnits: MetersCell Size: 231.91560581932 metersSource Type: ThematicPixel Type: 8-bit unsigned integerData Coordinate System: WGS 1984Mosaic Projection: Web Mercator Auxiliary SphereExtent: GlobalSource: EsriPublication Date: May 2016ArcGIS Server URL: https://landscape7.arcgis.com/arcgis/In February 2017, Esri updated the World Landforms - Improved Hammond Method service with two display functions: Ecological Land Units landform classes and Ecological Facets landform classes. This layer represents Ecological Facets landform classes. You can view the Ecological Land Units landform classes by choosing Image Display, and changing the Renderer. This layer was produced using the Improved Hammond Landform Classification Algorithm produced by Esri in 2016. This algorithm published and described by Karagulle et al. 2017: Modeling global Hammond landform regions from 250-m elevation data in Transactions in GIS.The algorithm, which is based on the most recent work in this area by Morgan, J. & Lesh, A. 2005: Developing Landform Maps Using Esri’s Model Builder., Esri converted Morgan’s model into a Python script and revised it to work on global 250-meter resolution GMTED2010 elevation data. Hammond’s landform classification characterizes regions rather than identifying individual features, thus, this layer contains sixteen classes of landforms:Nearly flat plainsSmooth plains with some local reliefIrregular plains with moderate relief Irregular plains with low hillsScattered moderate hillsScattered high hillsScattered low mountainsScattered high mountainsModerate hillsHigh hills Tablelands with moderate reliefTablelands with considerable reliefTablelands with high relief Tablelands with very high relief Low mountainsHigh mountainsTo produce these classes, Esri staff first projected the 250-meter resolution GMTED elevation data to the World Equidistant Cylindrical coordinate system. Each cell in this dataset was assigned three characteristics: slope based on 3-km neighborhood, relief based on 6 km neighborhood, and profile based on 6-km neighborhood. The last step was to overlay the combination of these three characteristics with areas that are exclusively plains. Slope is the percentage of the 3-km neighborhood occupied by gentle slope. Hammond specified 8% as the threshold for gentle slope. Slope is used to define how flat or steep the terrain is. Slope was classified into one of four classes: Percent of neighborhood over 8% of slopeSlope Classes0 - 20%40021% -50%30051% - 80%200>81% 100Local Relief is the difference between the maximum and minimum elevation within in the 6-km neighborhood. Local relief is used to define terrain how rugged or the complexity of the terrain's texture. Relief was assigned one of six classes:Change in elevationRelief Class ID0 – 30 meters1031 meter – 90 meters2091 meter – 150 meters30151 meter – 300 meters40301 meter – 900 meters50>900 meters60The combination of slope and relief begin to define terrain as mountains, hills and plains. However, the difference between mountains or hills and tablelands cannot be distinguished using only these parameters. Profile is used to determine tableland areas. Profile identifies neighborhoods with upland and lowland areas, and calculates the percent area of gently sloping terrain within those upland and lowland areas. A 6-km circular neighborhood was used to calculate the profile parameter. Upland/lowland is determined by the difference between average local relief and elevation. In the 6-km neighborhood window, if the difference between maximum elevation and cell’s elevation is smaller than half of the local relief it’s an upland. If the difference between maximum elevation and cell’s elevation is larger than half of the local relief it’s a lowland. Profile was assigned one of five classes:Percent of neighborhood over 8% slope in upland or lowland areasProfile ClassLess than 50% gentle slope is in upland or lowland0More than 75% of gentle slope is in lowland150%-75% of gentle slope is in lowland250-75% of gentle slope is in upland3More than 75% of gentle slope is in upland4Early reviewers of the resulting classes noted one confusing outcome, which was that areas were classified as "plains with low mountains", or "plains with hills" were often mostly plains, and the hills or mountains were part of an adjacent set of exclusively identified hills or mountains. To address this areas that are exclusively plains were produced, and used to override these confusing areas. The hills and mountains within those areas were converted to their respective landform class.The combination of slope, relief and profile merged with the areas of plains, can be better understood using the following diagram, which uses the colors in this layer to show which classes are present and what parameter values produced them:What can you do with this layer?This layer is suitable for both visualization and analysis. It can be used in ArcGIS Online in web maps and applications and can be used in ArcGIS Desktop. This layer is part of a larger collection of landscape layers that you can use to perform a wide variety of mapping and analysis tasks.The Living Atlas of the World provides an easy way to explore the landscape layers and many other beautiful and authoritative maps on hundreds of topics.Geonet is a good resource for learning more about landscape layers and the Living Atlas of the World. To get started see the Living Atlas Discussion Group.The Esri Insider Blog provides an introduction to the Ecophysiographic Mapping project.

WSDOT template for Esri file geodatabase polygon feature class. Template has pre-defined attribute schema to help users create data that is more consistent or compliant with agency standards. Metadata has been created using the FGDC metadata style but stored in the ArcGIS format. Content presentation will change upon export to FGDC format.This service is maintained by the WSDOT Transportation Data, GIS & Modeling Office. If you are having trouble viewing the service, please contact Online Map Support at onlinemapsupport@wsdot.wa.gov.

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. We converted the photointerpreted data into a format usable in a geographic information system (GIS) by employing three fundamental processes: (1) orthorectify, (2) digitize, and (3) develop the geodatabase. All digital map automation was projected in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), Zone 16, using the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). Orthorectify: We orthorectified the interpreted overlays by using OrthoMapper, a softcopy photogrammetric software for GIS. One function of OrthoMapper is to create orthorectified imagery from scanned and unrectified imagery (Image Processing Software, Inc., 2002). The software features a method of visual orientation involving a point-and-click operation that uses existing orthorectified horizontal and vertical base maps. Of primary importance to us, OrthoMapper also has the capability to orthorectify the photointerpreted overlays of each photograph based on the reference information provided. Digitize: To produce a polygon vector layer for use in ArcGIS (Environmental Systems Research Institute [ESRI], Redlands, California), we converted each raster-based image mosaic of orthorectified overlays containing the photointerpreted data into a grid format by using ArcGIS. In ArcGIS, we used the ArcScan extension to trace the raster data and produce ESRI shapefiles. We digitally assigned map-attribute codes (both map-class codes and physiognomic modifier codes) to the polygons and checked the digital data against the photointerpreted overlays for line and attribute consistency. Ultimately, we merged the individual layers into a seamless layer. Geodatabase: At this stage, the map layer has only map-attribute codes assigned to each polygon. To assign meaningful information to each polygon (e.g., map-class names, physiognomic definitions, links to NVCS types), we produced a feature-class table, along with other supportive tables and subsequently related them together via an ArcGIS Geodatabase. This geodatabase also links the map to other feature-class layers produced from this project, including vegetation sample plots, accuracy assessment (AA) sites, aerial photo locations, and project boundary extent. A geodatabase provides access to a variety of interlocking data sets, is expandable, and equips resource managers and researchers with a powerful GIS tool.

This dataset combines the work of several different projects to create a seamless data set for the contiguous United States. Data from four regional Gap Analysis Projects and the LANDFIRE project were combined to make this dataset. In the northwestern United States (Idaho, Oregon, Montana, Washington and Wyoming) data in this map came from the Northwest Gap Analysis Project. In the southwestern United States (Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah) data used in this map came from the Southwest Gap Analysis Project. The data for Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Virginia came from the Southeast Gap Analysis Project and the California data was generated by the updated California Gap land cover project. The Hawaii Gap Analysis project provided the data for Hawaii. In areas of the county (central U.S., Northeast, Alaska) that have not yet been covered by a regional Gap Analysis Project, data from the Landfire project was used. Similarities in the methods used by these projects made possible the combining of the data they derived into one seamless coverage. They all used multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+) from 1999-2001 in conjunction with digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform) to model natural and semi-natural vegetation. Vegetation classes were drawn from NatureServe's Ecological System Classification (Comer et al. 2003) or classes developed by the Hawaii Gap project. Additionally, all of the projects included land use classes that were employed to describe areas where natural vegetation has been altered. In many areas of the country these classes were derived from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). For the majority of classes and, in most areas of the country, a decision tree classifier was used to discriminate ecological system types. In some areas of the country, more manual techniques were used to discriminate small patch systems and systems not distinguishable through topography. The data contains multiple levels of thematic detail. At the most detailed level natural vegetation is represented by NatureServe's Ecological System classification (or in Hawaii the Hawaii GAP classification). These most detailed classifications have been crosswalked to the five highest levels of the National Vegetation Classification (NVC), Class, Subclass, Formation, Division and Macrogroup. This crosswalk allows users to display and analyze the data at different levels of thematic resolution. Developed areas, or areas dominated by introduced species, timber harvest, or water are represented by other classes, collectively refered to as land use classes; these land use classes occur at each of the thematic levels. Raster data in both ArcGIS Grid and ERDAS Imagine format is available for download at http://gis1.usgs.gov/csas/gap/viewer/land_cover/Map.aspx Six layer files are included in the download packages to assist the user in displaying the data at each of the Thematic levels in ArcGIS. In adition to the raster datasets the data is available in Web Mapping Services (WMS) format for each of the six NVC classification levels (Class, Subclass, Formation, Division, Macrogroup, Ecological System) at the following links. http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Class_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Subclass_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Formation_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Division_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Macrogroup_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_Ecological_Systems_Landuse/MapServer

The National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDplus) maps the lakes, ponds, streams, rivers and other surface waters of the United States. Created by the US EPA Office of Water and the US Geological Survey, the NHDPlus provides mean annual and monthly flow estimates for rivers and streams. Additional attributes provide connections between features facilitating complicated analyses. For more information on the NHDPlus dataset see the NHDPlus v2 User Guide.Dataset SummaryPhenomenon Mapped: Surface waters and related features of the United States and associated territories not including Alaska.Geographic Extent: The United States not including Alaska, Puerto Rico, Guam, US Virgin Islands, Marshall Islands, Northern Marianas Islands, Palau, Federated States of Micronesia, and American SamoaProjection: Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere Visible Scale: Visible at all scales but layer draws best at scales larger than 1:1,000,000Source: EPA and USGSUpdate Frequency: There is new new data since this 2019 version, so no updates planned in the futurePublication Date: March 13, 2019Prior to publication, the NHDPlus network and non-network flowline feature classes were combined into a single flowline layer. Similarly, the NHDPlus Area and Waterbody feature classes were merged under a single schema.Attribute fields were added to the flowline and waterbody layers to simplify symbology and enhance the layer's pop-ups. Fields added include Pop-up Title, Pop-up Subtitle, On or Off Network (flowlines only), Esri Symbology (waterbodies only), and Feature Code Description. All other attributes are from the original NHDPlus dataset. No data values -9999 and -9998 were converted to Null values for many of the flowline fields.What can you do with this layer?Feature layers work throughout the ArcGIS system. Generally your work flow with feature layers will begin in ArcGIS Online or ArcGIS Pro. Below are just a few of the things you can do with a feature service in Online and Pro.ArcGIS OnlineAdd this layer to a map in the map viewer. The layer is limited to scales of approximately 1:1,000,000 or larger but a vector tile layer created from the same data can be used at smaller scales to produce a webmap that displays across the full range of scales. The layer or a map containing it can be used in an application. Change the layer’s transparency and set its visibility rangeOpen the layer’s attribute table and make selections. Selections made in the map or table are reflected in the other. Center on selection allows you to zoom to features selected in the map or table and show selected records allows you to view the selected records in the table.Apply filters. For example you can set a filter to show larger streams and rivers using the mean annual flow attribute or the stream order attribute. Change the layer’s style and symbologyAdd labels and set their propertiesCustomize the pop-upUse as an input to the ArcGIS Online analysis tools. This layer works well as a reference layer with the trace downstream and watershed tools. The buffer tool can be used to draw protective boundaries around streams and the extract data tool can be used to create copies of portions of the data.ArcGIS ProAdd this layer to a 2d or 3d map. Use as an input to geoprocessing. For example, copy features allows you to select then export portions of the data to a new feature class. Change the symbology and the attribute field used to symbolize the dataOpen table and make interactive selections with the mapModify the pop-upsApply Definition Queries to create sub-sets of the layerThis layer is part of the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World that provides an easy way to explore the landscape layers and many other beautiful and authoritative maps on hundreds of topics.Questions?Please leave a comment below if you have a question about this layer, and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Class Other: Indicates transporting freight or storage of multiple hazard classes.

Land cover describes the surface of the earth. Land cover maps are useful in urban planning, resource management, change detection, agriculture, and a variety of other applications in which information related to earth surface is required. Land cover classification is a complex exercise and is hard to capture using traditional means. Deep learning models are highly capable of learning these complex semantics, giving superior results.Using the modelFollow the guide to use the model. Before using this model, ensure that the supported deep learning libraries are installed. For more details, check Deep Learning Libraries Installer for ArcGIS.Fine-tuning the modelThis model can be fine-tuned using the Train Deep Learning Model tool. Follow the guide to fine-tune this model.InputRaster, mosaic dataset, or image service. (Preferred cell size is 10 meters.)Note: This model is trained to work on Sentinel-2 Imagery datasets which are in WGS 1984 Web Mercator (auxiliary sphere) coordinate system (WKID 3857).OutputClassified raster with the same classes as in Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018.Applicable geographiesThis model is expected to work well in Europe and the United States.Model architectureThis model uses the UNet model architecture implemented in ArcGIS API for Python.Accuracy metricsThis model has an overall accuracy of 82.41% with Level-1C imagery and 84.0% with Level-2A imagery, for CLC class level 2 classification (15 classes). The table below summarizes the precision, recall and F1-score of the model on the validation dataset.ClassLevel-2A ImageryLevel-1C ImageryPrecisionRecallF1 ScorePrecisionRecallF1 ScoreUrban fabric0.810.830.820.820.840.83Industrial, commercial and transport units0.740.650.690.730.660.7Mine, dump and construction sites0.630.520.570.690.550.61Artificial, non-agricultural vegetated areas0.700.460.550.670.470.55Arable land0.860.900.880.860.890.87Permanent crops0.760.730.740.750.710.73Pastures0.750.710.730.740.710.73Heterogeneous agricultural areas0.610.560.580.620.510.56Forests0.880.930.900.880.920.9Scrub and/or herbaceous vegetation associations0.740.690.720.730.670.7Open spaces with little or no vegetation0.870.840.850.850.820.84Inland wetlands0.810.780.800.820.770.79Maritime wetlands0.740.760.750.870.890.88Inland waters0.940.920.930.940.910.92Marine waters0.980.990.980.970.980.98This model has an overall accuracy of 90.79% with Level-2A imagery for CLC class level 1 classification (5 classes). The table below summarizes the precision, recall and F1-score of the model on the validation dataset.ClassPrecisionRecallF1 ScoreArtificial surfaces0.850.810.83Agricultural areas0.900.910.91Forest and semi natural areas0.910.920.92Wetlands0.770.700.73Water bodies0.960.970.96Training dataThis model has been trained on the Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018 with the same Sentinel 2 scenes that were used to produce the database. Scene IDs for the imagery were available in the metadata of the dataset.Sample resultsHere are a few results from the model. To view more, see this story.

This webmap is a subset of Global Landcover 1992 - 2020 Image Layer. You can access the source data from here. This layer is a time series of the annual ESA CCI (Climate Change Initiative) land cover maps of the world. ESA has produced land cover maps for the years 1992-2020. These are available at the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative website.Time Extent: 1992-2020Cell Size: 300 meterSource Type: ThematicPixel Type: 8 Bit UnsignedData Projection: GCS WGS84Mosaic Projection: Web Mercator Auxiliary SphereExtent: GlobalSource: ESA Climate Change InitiativeUpdate Cycle: Annual until 2020, no updates thereafterWhat can you do with this layer?This layer may be added to ArcGIS Online maps and applications and shown in a time series to watch a "time lapse" view of land cover change since 1992 for any part of the world. The same behavior exists when the layer is added to ArcGIS Pro.In addition to displaying all layers in a series, this layer may be queried so that only one year is displayed in a map. This layer can be used in analysis. For example, the layer may be added to ArcGIS Pro with a query set to display just one year. Then, an area count of land cover types may be produced for a feature dataset using the zonal statistics tool. Statistics may be compared with the statistics from other years to show a trend.To sum up area by land cover using this service, or any other analysis, be sure to use an equal area projection, such as Albers or Equal Earth.Different Classifications Available to MapFive processing templates are included in this layer. The processing templates may be used to display a smaller set of land cover classes.Cartographic Renderer (Default Template)Displays all ESA CCI land cover classes.*Forested lands TemplateThe forested lands template shows only forested lands (classes 50-90).Urban Lands TemplateThe urban lands template shows only urban areas (class 190).Converted Lands TemplateThe converted lands template shows only urban lands and lands converted to agriculture (classes 10-40 and 190).Simplified RendererDisplays the map in ten simple classes which match the ten simplified classes used in 2050 Land Cover projections from Clark University.Any of these variables can be displayed or analyzed by selecting their processing template. In ArcGIS Online, select the Image Display Options on the layer. Then pull down the list of variables from the Renderer options. Click Apply and Close. In ArcGIS Pro, go into the Layer Properties. Select Processing Templates from the left hand menu. From the Processing Template pull down menu, select the variable to display.Using TimeBy default, the map will display as a time series animation, one year per frame. A time slider will appear when you add this layer to your map. To see the most current data, move the time slider until you see the most current year.In addition to displaying the past quarter century of land cover maps as an animation, this time series can also display just one year of data by use of a definition query. For a step by step example using ArcGIS Pro on how to display just one year of this layer, as well as to compare one year to another, see the blog called Calculating Impervious Surface Change.Hierarchical ClassificationLand cover types are defined using the land cover classification (LCCS) developed by the United Nations, FAO. It is designed to be as compatible as possible with other products, namely GLCC2000, GlobCover 2005 and 2009.This is a heirarchical classification system. For example, class 60 means "closed to open" canopy broadleaved deciduous tree cover. But in some places a more specific type of broadleaved deciduous tree cover may be available. In that case, a more specific code 61 or 62 may be used which specifies "open" (61) or "closed" (62) cover.Land Cover ProcessingTo provide consistency over time, these maps are produced from baseline land cover maps, and are revised for changes each year depending on the best available satellite data from each period in time. These revisions were made from AVHRR 1km time series from 1992 to 1999, SPOT-VGT time series between 1999 and 2013, and PROBA-V data for years 2013, 2014 and 2015. When MERIS FR or PROBA-V time series are available, changes detected at 1 km are re-mapped at 300 m. The last step consists in back- and up-dating the 10-year baseline LC map to produce the 24 annual LC maps from 1992 to 2015.Source dataThe datasets behind this layer were extracted from NetCDF files and TIFF files produced by ESA. Years 1992-2015 were acquired from ESA CCI LC version 2.0.7 in TIFF format, and years 2016-2018 were acquired from version 2.1.1 in NetCDF format. These are downloadable from ESA with an account, after agreeing to their terms of use. https://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.phpCitationESA. Land Cover CCI Product User Guide Version 2. Tech. Rep. (2017). Available at: maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download/ESACCI-LC-Ph2-PUGv2_2.0.pdfMore technical documentation on the source datasets is available here:https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/satellite-land-cover?tab=doc*Index of all classes in this layer:10 Cropland, rainfed11 Herbaceous cover12 Tree or shrub cover20 Cropland, irrigated or post-flooding30 Mosaic cropland (>50%) / natural vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (<50%)40 Mosaic natural vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (>50%) / cropland (<50%)50 Tree cover, broadleaved, evergreen, closed to open (>15%)60 Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, closed to open (>15%)61 Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, closed (>40%)62 Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, open (15-40%)70 Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, closed to open (>15%)71 Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, closed (>40%)72 Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, open (15-40%)80 Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, closed to open (>15%)81 Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, closed (>40%)82 Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, open (15-40%)90 Tree cover, mixed leaf type (broadleaved and needleleaved)100 Mosaic tree and shrub (>50%) / herbaceous cover (<50%)110 Mosaic herbaceous cover (>50%) / tree and shrub (<50%)120 Shrubland121 Shrubland evergreen122 Shrubland deciduous130 Grassland140 Lichens and mosses150 Sparse vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (<15%)151 Sparse tree (<15%)152 Sparse shrub (<15%)153 Sparse herbaceous cover (<15%)160 Tree cover, flooded, fresh or brakish water170 Tree cover, flooded, saline water180 Shrub or herbaceous cover, flooded, fresh/saline/brakish water190 Urban areas200 Bare areas201 Consolidated bare areas202 Unconsolidated bare areas210 Water bodies

The Functional Classification Maps define the classes into which streets and highways are grouped, based on their function within the overall roadway network. The source system is HPMS.

This data is for informational purposes and must be field verified prior to being used on a project.

This New Zealand Point Cloud Classification Deep Learning Package will classify point clouds into building and background classes. This model is optimized to work with New Zealand aerial LiDAR data.The classification of point cloud datasets to identify Building is useful in applications such as high-quality 3D basemap creation, urban planning, and planning climate change response.Building could have a complex irregular geometrical structure that is hard to capture using traditional means. Deep learning models are highly capable of learning these complex structures and giving superior results.This model is designed to extract Building in both urban and rural area in New Zealand.The Training/Testing/Validation dataset are taken within New Zealand resulting of a high reliability to recognize the pattern of NZ common building architecture.Licensing requirementsArcGIS Desktop - ArcGIS 3D Analyst extension for ArcGIS ProUsing the modelThe model can be used in ArcGIS Pro's Classify Point Cloud Using Trained Model tool. Before using this model, ensure that the supported deep learning frameworks libraries are installed. For more details, check Deep Learning Libraries Installer for ArcGIS.Note: Deep learning is computationally intensive, and a powerful GPU is recommended to process large datasets.The model is trained with classified LiDAR that follows the The model was trained using a training dataset with the full set of points. Therefore, it is important to make the full set of points available to the neural network while predicting - allowing it to better discriminate points of 'class of interest' versus background points. It is recommended to use 'selective/target classification' and 'class preservation' functionalities during prediction to have better control over the classification and scenarios with false positives.The model was trained on airborne lidar datasets and is expected to perform best with similar datasets. Classification of terrestrial point cloud datasets may work but has not been validated. For such cases, this pre-trained model may be fine-tuned to save on cost, time, and compute resources while improving accuracy. Another example where fine-tuning this model can be useful is when the object of interest is tram wires, railway wires, etc. which are geometrically similar to electricity wires. When fine-tuning this model, the target training data characteristics such as class structure, maximum number of points per block and extra attributes should match those of the data originally used for training this model (see Training data section below).OutputThe model will classify the point cloud into the following classes with their meaning as defined by the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) described below: 0 Background 6 BuildingApplicable geographiesThe model is expected to work well in the New Zealand. It's seen to produce favorable results as shown in many regions. However, results can vary for datasets that are statistically dissimilar to training data.Training dataset - Auckland, Christchurch, Kapiti, Wellington Testing dataset - Auckland, WellingtonValidation/Evaluation dataset - Hutt City Dataset City Training Auckland, Christchurch, Kapiti, Wellington Testing Auckland, Wellington Validating HuttModel architectureThis model uses the SemanticQueryNetwork model architecture implemented in ArcGIS Pro.Accuracy metricsThe table below summarizes the accuracy of the predictions on the validation dataset. - Precision Recall F1-score Never Classified 0.984921 0.975853 0.979762 Building 0.951285 0.967563 0.9584Training dataThis model is trained on classified dataset originally provided by Open TopoGraphy with < 1% of manual labelling and correction.Train-Test split percentage {Train: 75~%, Test: 25~%} Chosen this ratio based on the analysis from previous epoch statistics which appears to have a descent improvementThe training data used has the following characteristics: X, Y, and Z linear unitMeter Z range-137.74 m to 410.50 m Number of Returns1 to 5 Intensity16 to 65520 Point spacing0.2 ± 0.1 Scan angle-17 to +17 Maximum points per block8192 Block Size50 Meters Class structure[0, 6]Sample resultsModel to classify a dataset with 23pts/m density Wellington city dataset. The model's performance are directly proportional to the dataset point density and noise exlcuded point clouds.To learn how to use this model, see this story

Geospatial data about FSL Permeability Class ArcGIS Layer file. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Ground response--GIS data, June 2010. Downloadable GIS data includes: One ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 geodatabase, consisting of a set of 4 feature classes; Metadata for each feature class, in HTML format (for ease of reading outside of GIS software); One ArcGIS map document (ending in the .mxd extension), containing specifications for data presentation in ArcMap; One ArcGIS layer file for each feature class (ending in the .lyr extension), containing specifications for data presentation in the free ArcGIS Explorer (as well as ArcMap); README file

Soil map units are the basic geographic unit of the Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO). The SSURGO dataset is a compilation of soils information collected over the last century by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Map units delineate the extent of different soils. Data for each map unit contains descriptions of the soil’s components, productivity, unique properties, and suitability interpretations. Each soil type has a unique combination of physical, chemical, nutrient and moisture properties. Soil type has ramifications for engineering and construction activities, natural hazards such as landslides, agricultural productivity, the distribution of native plant and animal life and hydrologic and other physical processes. Soil types in the context of climate and terrain can be used as a general indicator of engineering constraints, agriculture suitability, biological productivity and the natural distribution of plants and animals. Data from thegSSURGO databasewas used to create this layer. To download ready-to-use project packages of useful soil data derived from the SSURGO dataset, please visit the USA SSURGO Downloader app. Dataset Summary Phenomenon Mapped:Soils of the United States and associated territoriesGeographic Extent:The 50 United States, Puerto Rico, Guam, US Virgin Islands, Marshall Islands, Northern Marianas Islands, Palau, Federated States of Micronesia, and American SamoaCoordinate System:Web Mercator Auxiliary SphereVisible Scale:1:144,000 to 1:1,000Source:USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Update Frequency:AnnualPublication Date:December 2024 What can you do with this layer?Feature layers work throughout the ArcGIS system. Generally your work flow with feature layers will begin in ArcGIS Online or ArcGIS Pro. Below are just a few of the things you can do with a feature service in Online and Pro.ArcGIS Online Add this layer to a map in the map viewer. The layer is limited to scales of approximately 1:144,000 or larger but avector tile layercreated from the same data can be used at smaller scales to produce awebmapthat displays across the full scale range. The layer or a map containing it can be used in an application.Change the layer’s transparency and set its visibility rangeOpen the layer’s attribute table and make selections and apply filters. Selections made in the map or table are reflected in the other. Center on selection allows you to zoom to features selected in the map or table and show selected records allows you to view the selected records in the table.Change the layer’s style and filter the data. For example, you could set a filter forFarmland Class= "All areas are prime farmland" to create a map of only prime farmland.Add labels and set their propertiesCustomize the pop-upArcGIS Pro Add this layer to a 2d or 3d map. The same scale limit as Online applies in ProUse as an input to geoprocessing. For example, copy features allows you to select then export portions of the data to a new feature class.Change the symbology and the attribute field used to symbolize the dataOpen table and make interactive selections with the mapModify the pop-upsApply Definition Queries to create sub-sets of the layerThis layer is part of theLiving Atlas of the Worldthat provides an easy way to explore the landscape layers and many other beautiful and authoritative maps on hundreds of topics. Data DictionaryAttributesKey fields from nine commonly used SSURGO tables were compiled to create the 173 attribute fields in this layer. Some fields were joined directly to the SSURGO Map Unit polygon feature class while others required summarization and other processing to create a 1:1 relationship between the attributes and polygons prior to joining the tables. Attributes of this layer are listed below in their order of occurrence in the attribute table and are organized by the SSURGO table they originated from and the processing methods used on them. Map Unit Polygon Feature Class Attribute TableThe fields in this table are from the attribute table of the Map Unit polygon feature class which provides the geographic extent of the map units. Area SymbolSpatial VersionMap Unit Symbol Map Unit TableThe fields in this table have a 1:1 relationship with the map unit polygons and were joined to the table using the Map Unit Key field. Map Unit NameMap Unit KindFarmland ClassInterpretive FocusIntensity of MappingIowa Corn Suitability Rating Legend TableThis table has 1:1 relationship with the Map Unit table and was joined using the Legend Key field. Project Scale Survey Area Catalog TableThe fields in this table have a 1:1 relationship with the polygons and were joined to the Map Unit table using the Survey Area Catalog Key and Legend Key fields. Survey Area VersionTabular Version Map Unit Aggregated Attribute TableThe fields in this table have a 1:1 relationship with the map unit polygons and were joined to the Map Unit attribute table using the Map Unit Key field. Slope Gradient - Dominant ComponentSlope Gradient - Weighted AverageBedrock Depth - MinimumWater Table Depth - Annual MinimumWater Table Depth - April to June MinimumFlooding Frequency - Dominant ConditionFlooding Frequency - MaximumPonding Frequency - PresenceAvailable Water Storage 0-25 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-50 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-100 cm - Weighted AverageAvailable Water Storage 0-150 cm - Weighted AverageDrainage Class - Dominant ConditionDrainage Class - WettestHydrologic Group - Dominant ConditionIrrigated Capability Class - Dominant ConditionIrrigated Capability Class - Proportion of Mapunit with Dominant ConditionNon-Irrigated Capability Class - Dominant ConditionNon-Irrigated Capability Class - Proportion of Mapunit with Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings without Basements - Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings with Basements - Dominant ConditionRating for Buildings with Basements - Least LimitingRating for Buildings with Basements - Most LimitingRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant ConditionRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Least LimitingRating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Most LimitingRating for Sewage Lagoons - Dominant ConditionRating for Sewage Lagoons - Dominant ComponentRating for Roads and Streets - Dominant ConditionRating for Sand Source - Dominant ConditionRating for Sand Source - Most ProbableRating for Paths and Trails - Dominant ConditionRating for Paths and Trails - Weighted AverageErosion Hazard of Forest Roads and Trails - Dominant ComponentHydric Classification - Presence Rating for Manure and Food Processing Waste - Weighted Average Component Table – Dominant ComponentMap units have one or more components. To create a 1:1 join component data must be summarized by map unit. For these fields a custom script was used to select the component with the highest value for the Component Percentage Representative Value field (comppct_r). Ties were broken with the Slope Representative Value field (slope_r). Components with lower average slope were selected as dominant. If both soil order and slope were tied, the first value in the table was selected. Component Percentage - Low ValueComponent Percentage - Representative ValueComponent Percentage - High ValueComponent NameComponent KindOther Criteria Used to Identify ComponentsCriteria Used to Identify Components at the Local LevelRunoff ClassSoil loss tolerance factorWind Erodibility IndexWind Erodibility GroupErosion ClassEarth Cover 1Earth Cover 2Hydric ConditionHydric RatingAspect Range - Counter Clockwise LimitAspect - Representative ValueAspect Range - Clockwise LimitGeomorphic DescriptionNon-Irrigated Capability SubclassNon-Irrigated Unit Capability ClassIrrigated Capability SubclassIrrigated Unit Capability ClassConservation Tree Shrub GroupGrain Wildlife HabitatGrass Wildlife HabitatHerbaceous Wildlife HabitatShrub Wildlife HabitatConifer Wildlife HabitatHardwood Wildlife HabitatWetland Wildlife HabitatShallow Water Wildlife HabitatRangeland Wildlife HabitatOpenland Wildlife HabitatWoodland Wildlife HabitatWetland Wildlife HabitatSoil Slip PotentialSusceptibility to Frost HeavingConcrete CorrosionSteel CorrosionTaxonomic ClassTaxonomic OrderTaxonomic SuborderGreat GroupSubgroupParticle SizeParticle Size ModCation Exchange Activity ClassCarbonate ReactionTemperature ClassMoist SubclassSoil Temperature RegimeEdition of Keys to Soil Taxonomy Used to Classify SoilCalifornia Storie IndexComponent Key Component Table – Weighted AverageMap units may have one or more soil components. To create a 1:1 join, data from the Component table must be summarized by map unit. For these fields a custom script was used to calculate an average value for each map unit weighted by the Component Percentage Representative Value field (comppct_r). Slope Gradient - Low ValueSlope Gradient - Representative ValueSlope Gradient - High ValueSlope Length USLE - Low ValueSlope Length USLE - Representative ValueSlope Length USLE - High ValueElevation - Low ValueElevation - Representative ValueElevation - High ValueAlbedo - Low ValueAlbedo - Representative ValueAlbedo - High ValueMean Annual Air Temperature - Low ValueMean Annual Air Temperature - Representative ValueMean Annual Air Temperature - High ValueMean Annual Precipitation - Low ValueMean Annual Precipitation - Representative ValueMean Annual Precipitation - High ValueRelative Effective Annual Precipitation - Low ValueRelative Effective Annual Precipitation - Representative ValueRelative Effective Annual Precipitation - High ValueDays between Last and First Frost - Low ValueDays between Last and First Frost - Representative ValueDays between Last and First Frost - High ValueRange Forage Annual Potential Production - Low ValueRange Forage Annual Potential Production - Representative ValueRange Forage Annual Potential Production - High ValueInitial Subsidence - Low ValueInitial Subsidence - Representative ValueInitial Subsidence -

Geospatial data about FSL Drainage Class ArcGIS layer file. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

2035 land use classes in the City of Chesapeake. Maintained by the Planning Department.

The WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study feature class data package includes comprehensive geospatial datasets and supporting information used to conduct building loss and casualty estimates for a Magnitude 9.0 Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) earthquake and tsunami. This data supported Hazus analysis and includes building and demographic inventories (such as Hazus-compatible user-defined facilities, population estimates, and age-based demographic layers); tsunami inundation and hazard layers (including tsunami hazard boundaries and wave arrival times); tsunami evacuation data; tsunami casualty and economic impact data; and other supporting geospatial layers.Metadata can be attained through URL links below.Feature class package includes:Feature Class: CBG_2010_ACS2019_Age65Plus_RatioName: American Community Survey 2015-2019 Age Estimates per 2010 Census Block Group for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: https://waseocgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=9b59baf3244141b2b5643e0a80446a2aRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Age_Estimates_per_2010_CBGs_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServerFeature Class: CBG_2020_Pop_and_Housing_AllName: US Census 2020 Census Block Group Population and Housing for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: https://waseocgis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=c39de520ee6d4643999a6494f33e8384Rest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/US_Census_2020_Population_and_Housing_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServerFeature Class: CensusBlock_2020_Pop_and_HousingName: US Census 2020 Census Block Population and Housing for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: US Census 2020 Census Block Population and Housing for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/US_Census_2020_Census_Block_Population_and_Housing_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServerFeature Class: Barriers_AssumedName: Assumed Evacuation Barriers for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Assumed Evacuation Barriers for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Barriers_to_CSZ_Tsunami_Evacuation/FeatureServerFeature Class: BridgeFailures_WRRAPName: Assumed Bridge Failures from RRAP for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Assumed Bridge Failures from RRAP for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Assumed_Bridge_Failures_for_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates_from_RRAP/FeatureServerFeature Class: NonBldg_LodgingName: WA Non Building Lodging Facilities for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: WA Non Building Lodging Facilities for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/WA_Non_Building_Lodging_Facilities_for_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: User_Defined_FacilitiesName: User Designed Facilities for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: User Designed Facilities for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/User_Designed_Facilities_for_WA_EMD_M9_CSZ_Tsunami_Casualty_and_Building_Loss_Estimate/FeatureServerFeature Class: County_WaterInclusive_LinesName: Water Inclusive County Line Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Water Inclusive County Line Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Water_Inclusive_County_Line_Boundaries_for_WA_EMD_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: County_Tsunami_HazusName: Terrestrial WA County Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Terrestrial WA County Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Washington_County_Terrestrial_Boundaries_for_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: County_WaterInclusiveName: Water Inclusive County Polygon Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Water Inclusive County Polygon Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Water_Inclusive_Washington_County_Boundaries_for_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: County_WaterInclusive_SubdivisionsName: Subdivided Water Inclusive WA County Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Subdivided Water Inclusive WA County Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Water_Inclusive_WA_County_Boundaries_for_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: CSZ_Earthquake_Tsunami_Study_ZoneName: WA Study Zone for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: WA Study Zone for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Washington_Study_Zone_for_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: Evacuation_Boundary_Compilation Name: Compiled WA County Tsunami Evacuation Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Compiled WA County Tsunami Evacuation Boundaries for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Compiled_WA_County_Tsunami_Evacuation_Boundaries_for_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: Evacuation_Constrained_Areas Name: WA Evacuation Constrained Areas for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: WA Evacuation Constrained Areas for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/WA_Evacuation_Constrained_Areas_for_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: PathDistance_2_PartialSafety_ftName: Path Distance to Partial Tsunami Safety for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Path Distance to Partial Tsunami Safety for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Path_Distance_to_Partial_Tsunami_Safety_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_and_Casualty_Estimates/FeatureServerFeature Class: PathDistance_2_Safety_ftName: Path Distance to Tsunami Safety for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Path Distance to Tsunami Safety for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Path_Distance_to_Tsunami_Safety_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServerFeature Class: Wave_Arrival_TimeName: Wave Arrival Time for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Wave Arrival Time for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Wave_Arrival_Time_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServerFeature Class: Roads_WA StateName: WA Tsunami Road and Trail Evacuation for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: WA Tsunami Road and Trail Evacuation for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/WA_Tsunami_Road_and_Trail_Evacuation_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServerFeature Class: FatalityBoundary_WA StateName: Tsunami Fatality Boundary for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Tsunami Fatality Boundary for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Tsunami_fatality_boundary_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServerFeature Class: HazardBoundary_WA_StateName: Tsunami Hazard Boundary for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Tsunami Hazard Boundary for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Tsunami_Hazard_Boundary_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServerFeature Class: StudyArea_WA_StateName: Study Area for Pedestrian Evacuation Analysis Tool for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate StudyURL: Study Area for Pedestrian Evacuation Analysis Tool for WA CSZ Tsunami Loss Estimate Study - OverviewRest Service: https://services7.arcgis.com/vUVXhXafpruJFs3l/arcgis/rest/services/Study_Area_for_WA_CSZ_Tsunami_Loss_Estimate_Study/FeatureServer

Bottom classification polygons represent the general type of sediment on the seafloor. Determined from acoustic data analysis and grab sampling.This is a MD iMAP hosted service layer. Find more information at https://imap.maryland.gov.Feature Service Layer Link:https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/Geoscientific/MD_Soils/MapServer/10