Federal and state rehabilitation tax credits help to stimulate private investment, create jobs, restore historic buildings and jump start the revitalization seen in Vermont’s Designated Downtowns and Village Centers. This layer identifies the locations of state tax credit projects. Learn more about the Vermont Downtown and Village Center Tax Credits.

1. This map is intended as a current snapshot of information that can be disclosed publicly regarding tax credit seismic surveys.2. Representation on this map does not guarantee public release and is subject to statutory requirements in effect at the time of acquisition and application for tax credit.3. Release is subject to public notice and permission of private oil and gas mineral estate owner where applicable. Some surveys require clipping to mineral ownership boundaries; actual map extents of released datasets may differ from those shown here. 4. Year label "Released" surveys denote actual release year. Year label "Eligible" and "Issued" denote the year in which the data is eligible for release and distribution under AS 43.55.025(f)(2)(c), most tax credit seismic projects are held confidential for 10 years from completion of initial seismic processing. 5. Map does not include surveys whose initial seismic processing was completed less than 10 years ago but prior to legislative adoption of the disclosure clause of AS 43.55.025(f)(5). Seismic surveys acquired with credits under AS 43.55.023 are not subject to disclosure under AS 43.55.025(f)(5), and cannot be represented here until their confidentiality period has expired.6. Additional qualifying surveys will be added to this map as new tax credit certificates are issued or as changes in confidentiality status allows.

The New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) is designed to support investment in communities and meet the housing needs of residents. The NMTC Program provides tax credits for investment into operating businesses and development projects located in qualifying "distressed" communities by certified Community Development Entities (CDEs).

This dataset identifies the project boundaries for registered Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) Scheme area based projects. Area based projects are generally savanna burning and sequestration activities. These ACCU Scheme projects are registered across a declared project area identified by project proponents at the time of registration. These project areas generally encompass the entire cadastral boundaries for the properties for which the participants intend to conduct their project activities and for which they hold the legal rights. For sequestration projects the project area does not generally represent the actual extent of a project activity which is generally a subset of the project area. These subset areas are known as Carbon Estimation Areas (CEA) which are defined by rules set out in the individual ACCU Scheme methods. A project can contain one or many CEAs. The dataset includes basic attribution including: Scheme Participant; Project Name; Project ID; Method; Method Type; Project Description; Date Project Registered; Project location (State); Project location (Postcode); Permanence Period; Project Status (Active or Revoked); and, Area Ha The Clean Energy Regulator publishes and maintains a project register which contains further details about projects registered under the Emissions Reduction Fund. The project register is published on the Clean Energy Regulator website at https://cer.gov.au/markets/reports-and-data/accu-project-and-contract-register.aspx and is the point of truth for information about ACCU Scheme projects. The project register contains attributes not in the spatial dataset, such as, the number of Australian carbon credit units (ACCUs) issued, whether any units have been relinquished, or if that land has a carbon maintenance obligation in place. However, the Project Id attribute (PROJ_ID) can be used to link the mapping data with the project register if analysis of those attributes is required. Notes: 1. Users should be aware that the project register is updated on a monthly basis. 2. The dataset does not contain the boundaries of ten projects which have had their location suppressed or partially suppressed. 3. The dataset contains revoked projects. These are identified as being revoked in the status column

Revitalization Areas identify those portions of Loudoun County, specifically the entire Suburban Policy Area & a portion of the Leesburg Joint Land Management Area, where residential developers can receive tax credit funding for proposed apartment projects. They also gain additional points in the Virginia Housing Development Authority's (VDHA) Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) competitive tax credit scoring system.In the LIHTC competition, with application review based on a point system, an application can receive 15 points for its location in a designated revitalization area. These 15 points may make the difference in winning the LIHTC in the competitive application process leading to the development of an affordable rental project.

Operators interested in developing a CCUS project will need to have an understanding of the underground geology in the vicinity of their project. Seismic surveys, traditionally used in oil and gas exploration, are now increasingly used in CCUS projects. They provide crucial information about the subsurface, aiding in site selection, risk assessment, and monitoring of CO2 storage. Seismic data helps understand subsurface geology, identify potential hazards, and monitor the migration of CO2 during storage. This dataset contains the location and extent of existing 3D seismic surveys that have occurred in Alaska and can be disclosed publicly.1. This map is intended as a current snapshot of information that can be disclosed publicly regarding tax credit seismic surveys.2. Representation on this map does not guarantee public release and is subject to statutory requirements in effect at the time of acquisition and application for tax credit.3. Release is subject to public notice and permission of private oil and gas mineral estate owner where applicable. Some surveys require clipping to mineral ownership boundaries; actual map extents of released datasets may differ from those shown here. 4. Year label "Released" surveys denote actual release year. Year label "Eligible" and "Issued" denote the year in which the data is eligible for release and distribution under AS 43.55.025(f)(2)(c), most tax credit seismic projects are held confidential for 10 years from completion of initial seismic processing. 5. Map does not include surveys whose initial seismic processing was completed less than 10 years ago but prior to legislative adoption of the disclosure clause of AS 43.55.025(f)(5). Seismic surveys acquired with credits under AS 43.55.023 are not subject to disclosure under AS 43.55.025(f)(5), and cannot be represented here until their confidentiality period has expired.6. Additional qualifying surveys will be added to this map as new tax credit certificates are issued or as changes in confidentiality status allows.

St. Johns River Water Management District Mitigation Banks Service Areas. A mitigation bank’s service area is the geographic area in which mitigation credits from the bank may be used to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters. The service area is established in the bank’s permit. The mitigation service areas of different banks may overlap. With three exceptions, mitigation credits may only be withdrawn to offset adverse impacts of projects located in the bank’s mitigation service area. The following projects or activities are eligible to use a mitigation bank even if they are not completely located in the bank’s mitigation service area: a. Projects with adverse impacts partially located within the mitigation service area b. Linear projects, such as roadways, transmission lines, pipelines c. Projects with total adverse impacts of less than one acre in size Before mitigation credits for these types of projects may be used, SJRWMD must still determine that the mitigation bank will offset the adverse impacts of the project and either that: On-site mitigation opportunities are not expected to have comparable long-term viability due to such factors as unsuitable hydrologic conditions or ecologically incompatible existing adjacent land uses; or Use of the mitigation bank would provide greater improvement in ecological value than on-site mitigation.

This data set is of service areas for mitigation and conservation banks for which the California Department of Fish and Wildlife is a signatory. It does not include service areas for banks which are approved only Federally or for credits for species for which the Department does not require mitigation. All data, including boundaries and species covered and should be verified with the bank sponsor prior to making any decisions based on this data set. The contact information for the bank sponsor can be found at https://wildlife.ca.gov/conservation/planning/banking/approved-banks. Please look at the "Comment" field for important information regarding individual Service Area limitations. A Conservation or Mitigation Bank is privately or publicly owned land managed for its natural resource values. In exchange for permanently protecting, managing, and monitoring the land, the bank sponsor is allowed to sell or transfer habitat credits to perrmitees who need to satisfy legal requirements and compensate for the environmental impacts of developmental projects.Conservation (Endangered Species) BankingA conservation bank generally protects threatened and endangered species and habitat. Credits are established for the specific sensitive species that occur on the site. Conservation banks help to consolidate small, fragmented sensitive species compensation projects into large contiguous preserves which have much higher wildlife habitat values. Other agencies that typically participate in the regulation and approval of conservation banks are the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Marine Fisheries Service.Mitigation (Wetlands) BankingA mitigation bank protects, restores, creates, and enhances wetland habitats. Credits are established to compensate for unavoidable wetland losses. Use of mitigation bank credits must occur in advance of development, when the compensation cannot be achieved at the development site or would not be as environmentally beneficial. Mitigation banking helps to consolidate small, fragmented wetland mitigation projects into large contiguous preserves which will have much higher wildlife habitat values. Mitigation banks are generally approved by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Programmatically generated Data Dictionary document detailing the TxDOT Projects service.

    The PDF contains service metadata and a complete list of data fields.
    For any questions or issues related to the document, please contact the data owner of the service identified in the PDF and Credits of this portal item.


  Related Links
  TxDOT Projects Service URL
  TxDOT Projects Portal Item

Programmatically generated Data Dictionary document detailing the TxDOT DCIS All Projects service.

    The PDF contains service metadata and a complete list of data fields.
    For any questions or issues related to the document, please contact the data owner of the service identified in the PDF and Credits of this portal item.


  Related Links
  TxDOT DCIS All Projects Service URL
  TxDOT DCIS All Projects Portal Item

The Maryland Department of Commerce (COMMERCE) identifies and maintains boundaries where business that invest in an economic development project in a "qualified distressed county" may qualify for project tax credits of up to $5 million and start-up tax credits of up to $500,000.This is a MD iMAP hosted service. Find more information at https://imap.maryland.gov.Feature Service Link:https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/BusinessEconomy/MD_IncentiveZones/FeatureServer/7

The Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is a tax incentive intended to increase the availability of low income housing. Section 42 provides an income tax credit to owners of newly constructed or substantially rehabilitated low-income rental housing projects. The dollar amount of the LIHTC available for allocation by each state (the "credit ceiling") is limited by population. Each state is allocated credit based on $1.25 per resident. States may carry forward unused or returned credit derived from the credit ceiling for one year; if not used by then, credit goes into a national pool to be allocated to states as additional credit. State and local housing agencies allocate the state's credit ceiling among low-income housing buildings whose owners have applied for the credit. The LIHTC reduces income tax liability. It is taken annually for a term of ten years and is intended to yield a present value of either (1) 70 percent of the "qualified basis" for new construction or rehabilitation that are not federally subsidized (i.e., financed with tax-exempt bonds or below-market federal loans), or (2) 30 percent of the qualified basis for the cost of acquiring certain existing projects or projects that are federally subsidized. The actual credit rates are adjusted monthly for projects placed in service after 1987. The qualified basis represents the product of the "applicable fraction" of the building and the "eligible basis" of the building. The applicable fraction is based on the number of low income units in the building as a percentage of the total number of units, or based on the floor space of low income units as a percentage of the total floor space of residential units in the building. The eligible basis is the adjusted basis attributable to acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction costs (depending on the type of LIHTC involved). In the case of buildings located in designated Qualified Census Tracts or designated Difficult Development Areas (DDA), eligible basis can be increased up to 130 percent of what it would otherwise be. This means that the available credit also can be increased by up to 30 percent. For example, if the 70 percent credit is available, it effectively could be increased up to 91 percent. There is a limit on the number of Qualified Census Tracts in any Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (PMSA) that may be designated to receive an increase in eligible basis: all of the designated census tracts within a given MSA/PMSA may not together contain more than 20 percent of the total population of the MSA/PMSA. For purposes of HUD designations of Qualified Census Tracts, all non-metropolitan areas in a state are treated as if they constituted a single metropolitan area.To learn more, go to: http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/qct.html. Data is current as of: 02/07/2013

A conservation or mitigation bank is privately or publicly owned land managed for its natural resource values. In exchange for permanently protecting, managing, and monitoring the land, the bank sponsor is allowed to sell or transfer habitat credits to permitees who need to satisfy legal requirements and compensate for the environmental impacts of developmental projects.Conservation (Endangered Species) BankingA conservation bank generally protects threatened and endangered species and habitat. Credits are established for the specific sensitive species that occur on the site. Conservation banks help to consolidate small, fragmented sensitive species compensation projects into large contiguous preserves which have much higher wildlife habitat values. Other agencies that typically participate in the regulation and approval of conservation banks are the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Marine Fisheries Service.Mitigation (Wetlands) BankingA mitigation bank protects, restores, creates, and enhances wetland habitats. Credits are established to compensate for unavoidable wetland losses. Use of mitigation bank credits must occur in advance of development, when the compensation cannot be achieved at the development site or would not be as environmentally beneficial. Mitigation banking helps to consolidate small, fragmented wetland mitigation projects into large contiguous preserves which will have much higher wildlife habitat values. Mitigation banks are generally approved by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

WSDOT operates three certified wetland mitigation banks: Moses Lake, North Fork Newaukum, and Springbrook Creek. Each bank includes a designated service area, as defined in its Mitigation Bank Instrument. These service areas outline the geographic boundaries within which WSDOT projects may apply bank credits for wetland mitigation. URL hyperlinks have been refreshed for both the Regulatory In-lieu Fee and Bank Information Tracking System (RIBITS) and the Washington State Department of Ecology mitigation bank project websites on October 24,2025.For more information, please contact Evan Dulin at evan.dulin@wsdot.wa.gov.

The Arkansas Historic District dataset contains the boundaries for all historic districts in Arkansas. The districts are formally designated through a process administered by the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program. These areas typically contain a concentration of buildings where half the structures are at least 50 years old and represent important elements of the areas. Property owners within the District may become eligible for federal tax credits through rehabilitation projects.The designation follows the process outlined below:The mayor or other representative of the interested city contacts the AHPP to express interest in the project.AHPP historians will visit the city to evaluate whether or not a sufficient concentration of historic structures exists to be designated a historic district. (Basically, at least 51 percent of the buildings must be 50 years or older and still reflect their historic appearance.)If a potential district exists, the AHPP will contact the city and provide a list of addresses for the buildings in the area that is eligible for district designation. The city or other local partners will generate the list of property owners.The AHPP will then work with the city to set a time and place for an informational meeting with property owners; the AHPP will mail letters to each of the property owners informing them of the meeting.At the meeting, AHPP representatives will explain the project, what is does and does not mean to be listed on the National Register, and how the 20 percent federal rehabilitation tax project works. Most questions and concerns about the project can be addressed at the meeting.After the meeting, the local partners will poll the property owners to determine whether or not at least 51 percent of them are interested in the historic district designation.After being notified that a majority of the owners are interested, the AHPP will contract an architectural resources survey of the district area, in which each building will be photographed and informational forms completed.At the completion of the survey, the AHPP will contract to have a National Register nomination completed for the district.When the nomination is completed, the AHPP will present it to its State Review Board, which meets the first Wednesday in April, August and December to make formal nominations to the National Register.Following the meeting, the nominations are sent to the Keeper of the National Register in Washington, D.C., who makes the final decision on whether a property is listed (The AHPP has a 99 percent success rate in this process).The decision on listing will be made within six weeks of delivery of the nomination to the Keeper.

The Arkansas Historic District dataset contains the boundaries for all historic districts in Arkansas. The districts are formally designated through a process administered by the Arkansas Historic Preservation Program. These areas typically contain a concentration of buildings where half the structures are at least 50 years old and represent important elements of the areas. Property owners within the District may become eligible for federal tax credits through rehabilitation projects.The designation follows the process outlined below:The mayor or other representative of the interested city contacts the AHPP to express interest in the project.AHPP historians will visit the city to evaluate whether or not a sufficient concentration of historic structures exists to be designated a historic district. (Basically, at least 51 percent of the buildings must be 50 years or older and still reflect their historic appearance.)If a potential district exists, the AHPP will contact the city and provide a list of addresses for the buildings in the area that is eligible for district designation. The city or other local partners will generate the list of property owners.The AHPP will then work with the city to set a time and place for an informational meeting with property owners; the AHPP will mail letters to each of the property owners informing them of the meeting.At the meeting, AHPP representatives will explain the project, what is does and does not mean to be listed on the National Register, and how the 20 percent federal rehabilitation tax project works. Most questions and concerns about the project can be addressed at the meeting.After the meeting, the local partners will poll the property owners to determine whether or not at least 51 percent of them are interested in the historic district designation.After being notified that a majority of the owners are interested, the AHPP will contract an architectural resources survey of the district area, in which each building will be photographed and informational forms completed.At the completion of the survey, the AHPP will contract to have a National Register nomination completed for the district.When the nomination is completed, the AHPP will present it to its State Review Board, which meets the first Wednesday in April, August and December to make formal nominations to the National Register.Following the meeting, the nominations are sent to the Keeper of the National Register in Washington, D.C., who makes the final decision on whether a property is listed (The AHPP has a 99 percent success rate in this process).The decision on listing will be made within six weeks of delivery of the nomination to the Keeper.

This feature layer was converted from raster to polygon and then published from the HVRA raster dataset specified below:This dataset is a 30-m cell size representation of a Highly Valued Resource or Asset (HVRA) selected for inclusion in the PNRA Wildfire Risk Assessment. This data layer is part of a set of Highly Valued Resources and Assets (HVRA) developed for the USFS Pacific Northwest Region Wildfire Risk Assessment (PNRA). Please reference the PNRA project report for more detailed information on data sources and reference the “PNRA_RF-RI_02.15.18_v12.2.xlsx” spreadsheet for raster value interpretation. Data source: Where People Live dataset representing housing density classes as developed by the West Wide Wildfire Risk Assessment project.Credits: Primary data contact: Rick Stratton (USFS) rdstratton@fs.fed.us. This dataset was developed for the USFS Pacific Northwest Region by Pyrologix LLC (www.pyrologix.com).

This tile layer was published from the HVRA raster dataset specified below:This dataset is a 30-m cell size representation of a Highly Valued Resource or Asset (HVRA) selected for inclusion in the PNRA Wildfire Risk Assessment. This data layer is part of a set of Highly Valued Resources and Assets (HVRA) developed for the USFS Pacific Northwest Region Wildfire Risk Assessment (PNRA). Please reference the PNRA project report for more detailed information on data sources and reference the “PNRA_RF-RI_02.15.18_v12.2.xlsx” spreadsheet for raster value interpretation. Data source: Where People Live dataset representing housing density classes as developed by the West Wide Wildfire Risk Assessment project.Credits: Primary data contact: Rick Stratton (USFS) rdstratton@fs.fed.us. This dataset was developed for the USFS Pacific Northwest Region by Pyrologix LLC (www.pyrologix.com).

Evaluating landscape connectivity in our watershed helps to identify these impacts, informing natural heritage system management and sustainable land-use planning. The Watershed-wide Connectivity Mapping is a tool for the Credit River Watershed that: 1.Characterizes terrestrial connectivity within the watershed using a landscape approach; 2.Identifies pinch points and potential movement corridors that are essential to maintaining connectivity throughout the watershed; 3.Identifies areas of low connectivity which provide little opportunity for the movement of species.For more details on the project and the analysis, please refer to the Credit River Watershed Connectivity Mapping User Guide (2025) and the project report, Evaluating Natural Heritage Connectivity in the Credit River Watershed (Abdel Moniem 2020).Click for Metadata here: Watershed-wide Connectivity Metadata (2021) To download the data, scroll down, click on the layer name, and then click the Download button.