8 datasets found
  1. G

    GeoFIELD v.2.2 - Data management and map production for the field geologist

    • ouvert.canada.ca
    • gimi9.com
    • +1more
    html
    Updated Jan 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Yukon (2025). GeoFIELD v.2.2 - Data management and map production for the field geologist [Dataset]. https://ouvert.canada.ca/data/dataset/db7ce925-2dac-9c04-0dde-e8c83082b9ec
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Government of Yukon
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    GeoFIELD is a data management system that is designed to facilitate practical data entry and the production of geologic maps while in the field. GeoFIELD writes data to a Microsoft Access 2000 database and allows digitizing and plotting of station locations and structural data in an AutoCAD Map 2000 drawing using a Visual Basic for Applications interface. GeoFIELD provides a user-friendly interface within a familiar Windows environment. Its extensive picklists are easily customizable and ensure consistency and quality control during data entry. The widespread availability and easy customization features of Microsoft Access make GeoFIELD a flexible application that can be adapted to varying needs. In addition, Microsoft Access provides the ability to easily build complex database queries and generate reports. GeoFIELD can also be used successfully with a handheld device as well as with common GIS applications such as ArcGIS 8.x.

  2. Rangewide SNPL Window Survey Form 2.0

    • gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 3, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2024). Rangewide SNPL Window Survey Form 2.0 [Dataset]. https://gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/cfe52c047f584790bddcd6f69f0e528a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.fws.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Area covered
    Earth
    Description

    This is a feature layer created from the Survey123 form to collect a baseline of data for the Western Snowy Plover during annual window surveys. This data is designed for use across the entire west coast portion of the species range, in collaboration with partners and cooperators. The form was created based on an initial version that was field tested in Recovery Unit 2. This form will similarly be tested across the range for it's field usability and data format creation. The intent is to continue to take feedback and improve the form for use across all recovery units.Western Snowy Plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus; plover) Census and Monitoring Surveys – United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). This project focuses on electronic data collection (using Survey123) for Western Snowy Plover annual monitoring surveys in all Recovery Units (1-6) which covers coastal California, Oregon and Washington.The plover was listed as a federally threatened species under the Endangered Species Act in 1993. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Western Snowy Plover Pacific Coast Population Recovery Plan was published in 2007. The 2007 Recovery Plan provides reasonable actions believed to be required to recover and/or protect plovers. The first action needed from the Recovery Plan is to monitor breeding and wintering populations and habitats of the Pacific coast population of the western snowy plover to determine progress of recovery actions to maximize survival and productivity. The census and monitoring surveys are critical data for determining if the recovery criteria have been met. Recovery criteria for delisting the plover includes: 1) An average of 3,000 breeding adults has been maintained for 10 years and 2) A yearly average productivity of at least one (1.0) fledged chick per male has been maintained in each recovery unit in the last 5 years prior to delisting. The survey effort is a collaboration between multiple FWS Field Offices, contracted partners, and official volunteers.For more information:Here is a direct link to the Data Management Plan for this project, the ServCat reference page, the Survey123 link, and a link to the relevant program page for Arcata Fish & Wildlife Office.

  3. A

    SSURGO Data Downloader (Mature Support)

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    esri rest, html
    Updated Oct 20, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    AmeriGEO ArcGIS (2017). SSURGO Data Downloader (Mature Support) [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/ssurgo-data-downloader-mature-support
    Explore at:
    html, esri restAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 20, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    AmeriGEO ArcGIS
    Description

    Mature Support: This item is in Mature Support. A new version of this application is available for your use.

    No longer do you have to spend time learning about the SSURGO database structure before you can use the data. No longer do you have to figure out how to import the data into the ArcGIS system to get your job done.

    Use this web map to download map packages created from the Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) that the Esri Soils Team has extracted and prepared for immediate use in your maps and analyses.

    The Esri Soils Team created a map with 130 of the most useful variables in SSURGO. The data are packaged by subbasin (HUC8 from the Watershed Boundary Dataset) and are available through this web map.

    The SSURGO data selected for this application consist of basic descriptions of the data (from the Map Unit Feature Class and Map Unit tables), a collection of interpretations (from the MUAGGATT table), and aggregated information about the components of each map unit (Component table). We chose these data because they represent the most commonly used fields in SSURGO and many of these values serve as standard inputs to assessment and modeling processes.

    Included in the map package is a zip folder containing 19 layer files to symbolize the data. The layer files contain the symbology from the Soil Mobile and Web Maps Group on ArcGIS.com. To access the folder use the Extract Package tool in the Data Management Toolbox then open the folder containing the extracted map package in Windows Explorer and navigate to commondata > userdata and unzip the LayerFiles.zip folder.

    Data from the four SSURGO tables were assembled into the single table included in each map package. Data from the component table were aggregated using a dominant component model (listed below under Component Table – Dominant Component) or a weighted average model (listed below under Component Table – Weighted Average) using custom Python scripts. The the Mapunit table, the MUAGATTAT table and the processed Component table data were joined to the Mapunit Feature Class. Field aliases were added and indexes calculated. A field named Map Symbol was created and populated with random integers from 1-10 for symbolizing the soil units in the map package.

    For documentation of the SSURGO dataset see:

    For documentation of the Watershed Boundary Dataset see:

    The map packages contain the following attributes in the Map Units layer:

    Mapunit Feature Class:
    Survey Area
    Spatial Version
    Mapunit Symbol
    Mapunit Key
    National Mapunit Symbol

    Mapunit Table:
    Mapunit Name
    Mapunit Kind
    Farmland Class
    Highly Erodible Lands Classification - Wind and Water
    Highly Erodible Lands Classification – Water
    Highly Erodible Lands Classification – Wind
    Interpretive Focus
    Intensity of Mapping
    Legend Key
    Mapunit Sequence
    Iowa Corn Suitability Rating

    Legend Table:
    Project Scale
    Tabular Version

    MUAGGATT Table:
    Slope Gradient - Dominant Component
    Slope Gradient - Weighted Average
    Bedrock Depth – Minimum
    Water Table Depth - Annual Minimum
    Water Table Depth - April to June Minimum
    Flooding Frequency - Dominant Condition
    Flooding Frequency – Maximum
    Ponding Frequency – Presence
    Available Water Storage 0-25 cm - Weighted Average
    Available Water Storage 0-50 cm - Weighted Average
    Available Water Storage 0-100 cm - Weighted Average
    Available Water Storage 0-150 cm - Weighted Average
    Drainage Class - Dominant Condition
    Drainage Class – Wettest
    Hydrologic Group - Dominant Condition
    Irrigated Capability Class - Dominant Condition
    Irrigated Capability Class - Proportion of Mapunit with Dominant Condition
    Non-Irrigated Capability Class - Dominant Condition
    Non-Irrigated Capability Class - Proportion of Mapunit with Dominant Condition
    Rating for Buildings without Basements - Dominant Condition
    Rating for Buildings with Basements - Dominant Condition
    Rating for Buildings with Basements - Least Limiting
    Rating for Buildings with Basements - Most Limiting
    Rating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Dominant Condition
    Rating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Least Limiting
    Rating for Septic Tank Absorption Fields - Most Limiting
    Rating for Sewage Lagoons - Dominant Condition
    Rating for Sewage Lagoons - Dominant Component
    Rating for Roads and Streets - Dominant Condition
    Rating for Sand Source - Dominant Condition
    Rating for Sand Source - Most Probable
    Rating for Paths and Trails - Dominant Condition
    Rating for Paths and Trails - Weighted Average
    Erosion Hazard of Forest Roads and Trails - Dominant Component
    Hydric Classification – Presence
    Rating for Manure and Food Processing Waste - Weighted Average

    Component Table – Weighted Average:
    Mean Annual Air Temperature - High Value
    Mean Annual Air Temperature - Low Value
    Mean Annual Air Temperature - Representative Value
    Albedo - High Value
    Albedo - Low Value
    Albedo - Representative Value
    Slope - High Value
    Slope - Low Value
    Slope - Representative Value
    Slope Length - High Value
    Slope Length - Low Value
    Slope Length - Representative Value
    Elevation - High Value
    Elevation - Low Value
    Elevation - Representative Value
    Mean Annual Precipitation - High Value
    Mean Annual Precipitation - Low Value
    Mean Annual Precipitation - Representative Value
    Days between Last and First Frost - High Value
    Days between Last and First Frost - Low Value
    Days between Last and First Frost - Representative Value
    Crop Production Index
    Range Forage Annual Potential Production - High Value
    Range Forage Annual Potential Production - Low Value
    Range Forage Annual Potential Production - Representative Value
    Initial Subsidence - High Value
    Initial Subsidence - Low Value
    Initial Subsidence - Representative Value
    Total Subsidence - High Value
    Total Subsidence - Low Value
    Total Subsidence - Representative Value

    Component Table – Dominant Component:
    Component Key
    Component Percentage - Low Value
    Component Percentage - Representative Value
    Component Percentage - High Value
    Component Name
    Component Kind
    Other Criteria Used to Identify Components
    Criteria Used to Identify Components at the Local Level
    Runoff
    Soil Loss Tolerance Factor
    Wind Erodibility Index
    Wind Erodibility Group
    Erosion Class
    Earth Cover 1
    Earth Cover 2
    Hydric Condition
    Aspect Range - Counter Clockwise Limit
    Aspect - Representative Value
    Aspect Range - Clockwise Limit
    Geomorphic Description
    Non-Irrigated Capability Subclass
    Non-Irrigated Unit Capability Class
    Irrigated Capability Subclass
    Irrigated Unit Capability Class
    Conservation Tree Shrub Group
    Forage Suitability Group
    Grain Wildlife Habitat
    Grass Wildlife Habitat
    Herbaceous Wildlife Habitat
    Shrub Wildlife Habitat
    Conifer Wildlife Habitat
    Hardwood Wildlife Habitat
    Wetland Wildlife Habitat
    Shallow Water Wildlife Habitat
    Rangeland Wildlife Habitat
    Openland Wildlife Habitat
    Woodland Wildlife Habitat
    Wetland Wildlife Habitat
    Soil Slip Potential
    Susceptibility to Frost Heaving
    Concrete Corrosion
    Steel Corrosion
    Taxonomic Class Name
    Order
    Suborder
    Great Group
    Subgroup
    Particle Size
    Particle Size Modifier
    Cation Exchange Activity Class
    Carbonate Reaction
    Temperature Class
    Moisture Subclass
    Soil Temperature Regime
    Edition of Keys to Soil Taxonomy Used to Classify Soil

    Esri generated field for Symbology:
    Map Symbol

    In accordance with NRCS recommendations, we suggest the following citation for the data:

    Soil Survey

  4. u

    GeoFIELD v.2.2 - Data management and map production for the field geologist...

    • data.urbandatacentre.ca
    • beta.data.urbandatacentre.ca
    Updated Oct 1, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). GeoFIELD v.2.2 - Data management and map production for the field geologist - Catalogue - Canadian Urban Data Catalogue (CUDC) [Dataset]. https://data.urbandatacentre.ca/dataset/gov-canada-db7ce925-2dac-9c04-0dde-e8c83082b9ec
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 1, 2024
    Description

    GeoFIELD is a data management system that is designed to facilitate practical data entry and the production of geologic maps while in the field. GeoFIELD writes data to a Microsoft Access 2000 database and allows digitizing and plotting of station locations and structural data in an AutoCAD Map 2000 drawing using a Visual Basic for Applications interface. GeoFIELD provides a user-friendly interface within a familiar Windows environment. Its extensive picklists are easily customizable and ensure consistency and quality control during data entry. The widespread availability and easy customization features of Microsoft Access make GeoFIELD a flexible application that can be adapted to varying needs. In addition, Microsoft Access provides the ability to easily build complex database queries and generate reports. GeoFIELD can also be used successfully with a handheld device as well as with common GIS applications such as ArcGIS 8.x.

  5. n

    NYS Building Footprints

    • data.gis.ny.gov
    Updated Mar 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ShareGIS NY (2023). NYS Building Footprints [Dataset]. https://data.gis.ny.gov/datasets/nys-building-footprints-2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 21, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    ShareGIS NY
    Area covered
    Description

    NYS Building Footprints - metadata info:The New York State building footprints service contains building footprints with address information. The footprints have address point information folded in from the Streets and Address Matching (SAM - https://gis.ny.gov/streets/) address point file. The building footprints have a field called “Address Range”, this field shows (where available) either a single address or an address range, depending on the address points that fall within the footprint. Ex: 3860 Atlantic Avenue or Ex: 32 - 34 Wheatfield Circle Building footprints in New York State are from four different sources: Microsoft, Open Data, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), and Geospatial Services. The majority of the footprints are from NYSERDA, except in NYC where the primary source was Open Data. Microsoft footprints were added where the other 2 sources were missing polygons. Field Descriptions: NYSGeo Source : tells the end user if the source is NYSERDA, Microsoft, NYC Open Data, and could expand from here in the futureAddress Point Count: the number of address points that fall within that building footprintAddress Range : If an address point falls within a footprint it lists the range of those address points. Ex: if a building is on a corner of South Pearl and Beaver Street, 40 points fall on the building, and 35 are South Pearl Street it would give the range of addresses for South Pearl. We also removed sub addresses from this range, primarily apartment related. For example, in above example, it would not list 30 South Pearl, Apartment 5A, it would list 30 South Pearl.Most Common Street : the street name of the largest number of address points. In the above example, it would list “South Pearl” as the most common street since the majority of address points list it as the street. Other Streets: the list of other streets that fall within the building footprint, if any. In the above example, “Beaver Street” would be listed since address points for Beaver Street fall on the footprint but are not in the majority.County Name : County name populated from CIESINs. If not populated from CIESINs, identified by the GSMunicipality Name : Municipality name populated from CIESINs. If not populated from CIESINs, identified by the GSSource: Source where the data came from. If NYSGeo Source = NYSERDA, the data would typically list orthoimagery, LIDAR, county data, etc.Source ID: if NYSGeo Source = NYSERDA, Source ID would typically list an orthoimage or LIDAR tileSource Date: Date the footprint was created. If the source image was from 2016 orthoimagery, 2016 would be the Source Date. Description of each footprint source:NYSERDA Building footprints that were created as part of the New York State Flood Impact Decision Support Systems https://fidss.ciesin.columbia.edu/home Footprints vary in age from county to county.Microsoft Building Footprints released 6/28/2018 - vintage unknown/varies. More info on this dataset can be found at https://blogs.bing.com/maps/2018-06/microsoft-releases-125-million-building-footprints-in-the-us-as-open-data.NYC Open Data - Building Footprints of New York City as a polygon feature class. Last updated 7/30/2018, downloaded on 8/6/2018. Feature Class of footprint outlines of buildings in New York City. Please see the following link for additional documentation- https://github.com/CityOfNewYork/nyc-geo-metadata/blob/master/Metadata/Metadata_BuildingFootprints.mdSpatial Reference of Source Data: UTM Zone 18, meters, NAD 83. Spatial Reference of Web Service: Spatial Reference of Web Service: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere.

  6. a

    Underground Mines

    • data-indnr.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Nov 9, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    InDNRMaps (2015). Underground Mines [Dataset]. https://data-indnr.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/underground-mines
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 9, 2015
    Dataset authored and provided by
    InDNRMaps
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Coal_Mine_Underground_DNR_IN is a composite of all underground mine locations in Indiana. It was compiled by the Indiana Geological Survey (IGS) as part of a contract deliverable for the Abandoned Mine Lands program of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Reclamation. Coal_Mine_Underground_DNR_IN incorporates underground mine locations compiled by the IGS in the early 1980s with hundreds of historic underground mine locations digitized in 1998-1999 and contemporary mine outlines digitized from maps collected from coal companies or the Indiana Bureau of Mines. Original source information for Coal_Mine_Underground_DNR_IN includes company mine maps, field maps and notes of IGS geologists, IGS publications, and Indiana State Mine Inspector Reports. All mine data included in Coal_Mine_Underground_DNR_IN are organized in a GIS using ESRI ArcGIS software of the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) on the Windows platform. Scale of source data ranges from 1:4,800 to 1:100,000. Coal_Mine_Underground_DNR_IN includes attributes which allow the mine polygons to be differentiated based on mine type, mine number, source information, and dates of mining.

  7. a

    Coal Mine Entries 2016

    • indianamapold-inmap.hub.arcgis.com
    • indianamap.org
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 15, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    IndianaMap (2017). Coal Mine Entries 2016 [Dataset]. https://indianamapold-inmap.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/b42257779032462d8ba2810cb4391e8f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 15, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    IndianaMap
    Area covered
    Description

    COAL_MINE_ENTRIES_DNR_IN.SHP contains the entrance locations of all documented underground coal mine entrances that have operated in the coal region of Indiana since the mid-1880s, up to December 31, 2016. COAL_MINE_ENTRIES_DNR_IN.SHP is attributed to allow the mine entrances to be differentiated based on entrance type (hoist shaft, other shafts, slope, unknown), depth, mine number, and source information (map number). The following is excerpted from the metadata provided by IDNR, Division of Reclamation, for the source point feature class named "COAL_ENTRY_GEOREF": "Coal_Mine_Entries_DNR_IN is a compilation of all documented underground coal mine entrances in Indiana. Coal_Mine_Entries_DNR_IN was compiled by the Indiana Geological Survey (IGS) as part of a contract deliverable for the Abandoned Mine Lands program of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Reclamation. Coal_Mine_Entries_DNR_IN incorporates mine entrance locations compiled as part of the Indiana Coal Mine Information System (CMIS), an integrated geographic information system (GIS) and database management system (DBMS) created to store, analyze, and help distribute coal mine data in Indiana. The system contains data for surface and underground coal mines that operated in Indiana from the mid-1830s to 2007. Original source information for Coal_Mine_Entries_DNR_IN includes company mine maps, field maps and notes of IGS geologists, IGS publications, and Reports of the Indiana State Mine Inspector. All mine data included in Coal_Mine_Entries_DNR_IN are organized in a GIS using ESRI ArcGIS software of the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) on the Windows platform. Scale of source data ranges from 1:4,800 to 1:100,000."

  8. a

    Columbia County Building Footprints

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 17, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Columbia County Planning (2024). Columbia County Building Footprints [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/c4fd805873cf497b90edc4452f3e3b38
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 17, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Columbia County Planning
    Area covered
    Description

    Updated building footprint data for Columbia County NY.The New York State building footprints service contains building footprints with address information. The footprints have address point information folded in from the Streets and Address Matching (SAM - https://gis.ny.gov/streets/) address point file. The building footprints have a field called “Address Range”, this field shows (where available) either a single address or an address range, depending on the address points that fall within the footprint. Ex: 3860 Atlantic Avenue or Ex: 32 - 34 Wheatfield Circle.Building footprints in New York State are from four different sources: Microsoft, Open Data, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), and Geospatial Services. The majority of the footprints are from NYSERDA, except in NYC where the primary source was Open Data. Microsoft footprints were added where the other 2 sources were missing polygons.Field Descriptions:NYSGeo Source: tells the end user if the source is NYSERDA, Microsoft, NYC Open Data, and could expand from here in the future.Address Point Count: the number of address points that fall within that building footprint.Address Range : If an address point falls within a footprint it lists the range of those address points. Ex: if a building is on a corner of South Pearl and Beaver Street, 40 points fall on the building, and 35 are South Pearl Street it would give the range of addresses for South Pearl. We also removed sub addresses from this range, primarily apartment related. For example, in above example, it would not list 30 South Pearl, Apartment 5A, it would list 30 South Pearl.Most Common Street: the street name of the largest number of address points. In the above example, it would list “South Pearl” as the most common street since the majority of address points list it as the street.Other Streets: the list of other streets that fall within the building footprint, if any. In the above example, “Beaver Street” would be listed since address points for Beaver Street fall on the footprint but are not in the majority.County Name: County name populated from CIESINs. If not populated from CIESINs, identified by the GS.Municipality Name: Municipality name populated from CIESINs. If not populated from CIESINs, identified by the GS.Source: Source where the data came from. If NYSGeo Source = NYSERDA, the data would typically list orthoimagery, LIDAR, county data, etc.Source ID: if NYSGeo Source = NYSERDA, Source ID would typically list an orthoimage or LIDAR tile.Source Date: Date the footprint was created. If the source image was from 2016 orthoimagery, 2016 would be the Source Date.Description of each footprint source: NYSERDA Building footprints that were created as part of the New York State Flood Impact Decision Support Systems https://fidss.ciesin.columbia.edu/home Footprints vary in age from county to county. Microsoft Building Footprints released 6/28/2018 - vintage unknown/varies.More info on this dataset can be found at https://blogs.bing.com/maps/2018-06/microsoft-releases-125-million-building-footprints-in-the-us-as-open-data.NYC Open Data - Building Footprints of New York City as a polygon feature class. Last updated 7/30/2018, downloaded on 8/6/2018.Feature Class of footprint outlines of buildings in New York City.Please see the following link for additional documentation- https://github.com/CityOfNewYork/nyc-geo-metadata/blob/master/Metadata/Metadata_BuildingFootprints.md

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Government of Yukon (2025). GeoFIELD v.2.2 - Data management and map production for the field geologist [Dataset]. https://ouvert.canada.ca/data/dataset/db7ce925-2dac-9c04-0dde-e8c83082b9ec

GeoFIELD v.2.2 - Data management and map production for the field geologist

Explore at:
htmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jan 9, 2025
Dataset provided by
Government of Yukon
License

Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
License information was derived automatically

Description

GeoFIELD is a data management system that is designed to facilitate practical data entry and the production of geologic maps while in the field. GeoFIELD writes data to a Microsoft Access 2000 database and allows digitizing and plotting of station locations and structural data in an AutoCAD Map 2000 drawing using a Visual Basic for Applications interface. GeoFIELD provides a user-friendly interface within a familiar Windows environment. Its extensive picklists are easily customizable and ensure consistency and quality control during data entry. The widespread availability and easy customization features of Microsoft Access make GeoFIELD a flexible application that can be adapted to varying needs. In addition, Microsoft Access provides the ability to easily build complex database queries and generate reports. GeoFIELD can also be used successfully with a handheld device as well as with common GIS applications such as ArcGIS 8.x.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu