Statistical analyses and maps representing mean, high, and low water-level conditions in the surface water and groundwater of Miami-Dade County were made by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, to help inform decisions necessary for urban planning and development. Sixteen maps were created that show contours of (1) the mean of daily water levels at each site during October and May for the 2000-2009 water years; (2) the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the daily water levels at each site during October and May and for all months during 2000-2009; and (3) the differences between mean October and May water levels, as well as the differences in the percentiles of water levels for all months, between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009. The 80th, 90th, and 96th percentiles of the annual maximums of daily groundwater levels during 1974-2009 (a 35-year period) were computed to provide an indication of unusually high groundwater-level conditions. These maps and statistics provide a generalized understanding of the variations of water levels in the aquifer, rather than a survey of concurrent water levels. Water-level measurements from 473 sites in Miami-Dade County and surrounding counties were analyzed to generate statistical analyses. The monitored water levels included surface-water levels in canals and wetland areas and groundwater levels in the Biscayne aquifer. Maps were created by importing site coordinates, summary water-level statistics, and completeness of record statistics into a geographic information system, and by interpolating between water levels at monitoring sites in the canals and water levels along the coastline. Raster surfaces were created from these data by using the triangular irregular network interpolation method. The raster surfaces were contoured by using geographic information system software. These contours were imprecise in some areas because the software could not fully evaluate the hydrology given available information; therefore, contours were manually modified where necessary. The ability to evaluate differences in water levels between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 is limited in some areas because most of the monitoring sites did not have 80 percent complete records for one or both of these periods. The quality of the analyses was limited by (1) deficiencies in spatial coverage; (2) the combination of pre- and post-construction water levels in areas where canals, levees, retention basins, detention basins, or water-control structures were installed or removed; (3) an inability to address the potential effects of the vertical hydraulic head gradient on water levels in wells of different depths; and (4) an inability to correct for the differences between daily water-level statistics. Contours are dashed in areas where the locations of contours have been approximated because of the uncertainty caused by these limitations. Although the ability of the maps to depict differences in water levels between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 was limited by missing data, results indicate that near the coast water levels were generally higher in May during 2000-2009 than during 1990-1999; and that inland water levels were generally lower during 2000-2009 than during 1990-1999. Generally, the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of water levels from all months were also higher near the coast and lower inland during 2000–2009 than during 1990-1999. Mean October water levels during 2000-2009 were generally higher than during 1990-1999 in much of western Miami-Dade County, but were lower in a large part of eastern Miami-Dade County.
Parcels and property data maintained and provided by Lee County Property Appraiser are converted to points. Property attribute data joined to parcel GIS layer by Lee County Government GIS. This dataset is generally used in spatial analysis.Process description: Parcel polygons, condominium points and property data provided by the Lee County Property Appraiser are processed by Lee County's GIS Department using the following steps:Join property data to parcel polygons Join property data to condo pointsConvert parcel polygons to points using ESRI's ArcGIS tool "Feature to Point" and designate the "Source" field "P".Load Condominium points into this layer and designate the "Source" field "C". Add X/Y coordinates in Florida State Plane West, NAD 83, feet using the "Add X/Y" tool.Projected coordinate system name: NAD_1983_StatePlane_Florida_West_FIPS_0902_FeetGeographic coordinate system name: GCS_North_American_1983
Name
Type
Length
Description
STRAP
String
25
17-digit Property ID (Section, Township, Range, Area, Block, Lot)
BLOCK
String
10
5-digit portion of STRAP (positions 9-13)
LOT
String
8
Last 4-digits of STRAP
FOLIOID
Double
8
Unique Property ID
MAINTDATE
Date
8
Date LeePA staff updated record
MAINTWHO
String
20
LeePA staff who updated record
UPDATED
Date
8
Data compilation date
HIDE_STRAP
String
1
Confidential parcel ownership
TRSPARCEL
String
17
Parcel ID sorted by Township, Range & Section
DORCODE
String
2
Department of Revenue. See https://leepa.org/Docs/Codes/DOR_Code_List.pdf
CONDOTYPE
String
1
Type of condominium: C (commercial) or R (residential)
UNITOFMEAS
String
2
Type of Unit of Measure (ex: AC=acre, LT=lot, FF=frontage in feet)
NUMUNITS
Double
8
Number of Land Units (units defined in UNITOFMEAS)
FRONTAGE
Integer
4
Road Frontage in Feet
DEPTH
Integer
4
Property Depth in Feet
GISACRES
Double
8
Total Computed Acres from GIS
TAXINGDIST
String
3
Taxing District of Property
TAXDISTDES
String
60
Taxing District Description
FIREDIST
String
3
Fire District of Property
FIREDISTDE
String
60
Fire District Description
ZONING
String
10
Zoning of Property
ZONINGAREA
String
3
Governing Area for Zoning
LANDUSECOD
SmallInteger
2
Land Use Code
LANDUSEDES
String
60
Land Use Description
LANDISON
String
5
BAY,CANAL,CREEK,GULF,LAKE,RIVER & GOLF
SITEADDR
String
55
Lee County Addressing/E911
SITENUMBER
String
10
Property Location - Street Number
SITESTREET
String
40
Street Name
SITEUNIT
String
5
Unit Number
SITECITY
String
20
City
SITEZIP
String
5
Zip Code
JUST
Double
8
Market Value
ASSESSED
Double
8
Building Value + Land Value
TAXABLE
Double
8
Taxable Value
LAND
Double
8
Land Value
BUILDING
Double
8
Building Value
LXFV
Double
8
Land Extra Feature Value
BXFV
Double
8
Building Extra Feature value
NEWBUILT
Double
8
New Construction Value
AGAMOUNT
Double
8
Agriculture Exemption Value
DISAMOUNT
Double
8
Disability Exemption Value
HISTAMOUNT
Double
8
Historical Exemption Value
HSTDAMOUNT
Double
8
Homestead Exemption Value
SNRAMOUNT
Double
8
Senior Exemption Value
WHLYAMOUNT
Double
8
Wholly Exemption Value
WIDAMOUNT
Double
8
Widow Exemption Value
WIDRAMOUNT
Double
8
Widower Exemption Value
BLDGCOUNT
SmallInteger
2
Total Number of Buildings on Parcel
MINBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Oldest Building Built
MAXBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Newest Building Built
TOTALAREA
Double
8
Total Building Area
HEATEDAREA
Double
8
Total Heated Area
MAXSTORIES
Double
8
Tallest Building on Parcel
BEDROOMS
Integer
4
Total Number of Bedrooms
BATHROOMS
Double
8
Total Number of Bathrooms / Not For Comm
GARAGE
String
1
Garage on Property 'Y'
CARPORT
String
1
Carport on Property 'Y'
POOL
String
1
Pool on Property 'Y'
BOATDOCK
String
1
Boat Dock on Property 'Y'
SEAWALL
String
1
Sea Wall on Property 'Y'
NBLDGCOUNT
SmallInteger
2
Total Number of New Buildings on ParcelTotal Number of New Buildings on Parcel
NMINBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Oldest New Building Built
NMAXBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Newest New Building Built
NTOTALAREA
Double
8
Total New Building Area
NHEATEDARE
Double
8
Total New Heated Area
NMAXSTORIE
Double
8
Tallest New Building on Parcel
NBEDROOMS
Integer
4
Total Number of New Bedrooms
NBATHROOMS
Double
8
Total Number of New Bathrooms/Not For Comm
NGARAGE
String
1
New Garage on Property 'Y'
NCARPORT
String
1
New Carport on Property 'Y'
NPOOL
String
1
New Pool on Property 'Y'
NBOATDOCK
String
1
New Boat Dock on Property 'Y'
NSEAWALL
String
1
New Sea Wall on Property 'Y'
O_NAME
String
30
Owner Name
O_OTHERS
String
120
Other Owners
O_CAREOF
String
30
In Care Of Line
O_ADDR1
String
30
Owner Mailing Address Line 1
O_ADDR2
String
30
Owner Mailing Address Line 2
O_CITY
String
30
Owner Mailing City
O_STATE
String
2
Owner Mailing State
O_ZIP
String
9
Owner Mailing Zip
O_COUNTRY
String
30
Owner Mailing Country
S_1DATE
Date
8
Most Current Sale Date > $100.00
S_1AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_1VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_1TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_1TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_1OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_2DATE
Date
8
Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_2AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_2VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_2TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_2TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_2OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_3DATE
Date
8
Next Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_3AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_3VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_3TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_3TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_3OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_4DATE
Date
8
Next Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_4AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_4VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_4TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_4TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_4OR_NUM
String
13
Statewide 2016 Lidar points colorized with 2018 NAIP imagery as a scene created by Esri using ArcGIS Pro for the entire State of Connecticut. This service provides the colorized Lidar point in interactive 3D for visualization, interaction of the ability to make measurements without downloading.Lidar is referenced at https://cteco.uconn.edu/data/lidar/ and can be downloaded at https://cteco.uconn.edu/data/download/flight2016/. Metadata: https://cteco.uconn.edu/data/flight2016/info.htm#metadata. The Connecticut 2016 Lidar was captured between March 11, 2016 and April 16, 2016. Is covers 5,240 sq miles and is divided into 23, 381 tiles. It was acquired by the Captiol Region Council of Governments with funding from multiple state agencies. It was flown and processed by Sanborn. The delivery included classified point clouds and 1 meter QL2 DEMs. The 2016 Lidar is published on the Connecticut Environmental Conditions Online (CT ECO) website. CT ECO is the collaborative work of the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) and the University of Connecticut Center for Land Use Education and Research (CLEAR) to share environmental and natural resource information with the general public. CT ECO's mission is to encourage, support, and promote informed land use and development decisions in Connecticut by providing local, state and federal agencies, and the public with convenient access to the most up-to-date and complete natural resource information available statewide.Process used:Extract Building Footprints from Lidar1. Prepare Lidar - Download 2016 Lidar from CT ECO- Create LAS Dataset2. Extract Building Footprints from LidarUse the LAS Dataset in the Classify Las Building Tool in ArcGIS Pro 2.4.Colorize LidarColorizing the Lidar points means that each point in the point cloud is given a color based on the imagery color value at that exact location.1. Prepare Imagery- Acquire 2018 NAIP tif tiles from UConn (originally from USDA NRCS).- Create mosaic dataset of the NAIP imagery.2. Prepare and Analyze Lidar Points- Change the coordinate system of each of the lidar tiles to the Projected Coordinate System CT NAD 83 (2011) Feet (EPSG 6434). This is because the downloaded tiles come in to ArcGIS as a Custom Projection which cannot be published as a Point Cloud Scene Layer Package.- Convert Lidar to zlas format and rearrange. - Create LAS Datasets of the lidar tiles.- Colorize Lidar using the Colorize LAS tool in ArcGIS Pro. - Create a new LAS dataset with a division of Eastern half and Western half due to size limitation of 500GB per scene layer package. - Create scene layer packages (.slpk) using Create Cloud Point Scene Layer Package. - Load package to ArcGIS Online using Share Package. - Publish on ArcGIS.com and delete the scene layer package to save storage cost.Additional layers added:Visit https://cteco.uconn.edu/projects/lidar3D/layers.htm for a complete list and links. 3D Buildings and Trees extracted by Esri from the lidarShaded Relief from CTECOImpervious Surface 2012 from CT ECONAIP Imagery 2018 from CTECOContours (2016) from CTECOLidar 2016 Download Link derived from https://www.cteco.uconn.edu/data/download/flight2016/index.htm
This dataset is a compilation of address point data for the City of Tempe. The dataset contains a point location, the official address (as defined by The Building Safety Division of Community Development) for all occupiable units and any other official addresses in the City. There are several additional attributes that may be populated for an address, but they may not be populated for every address. Contact: Lynn Flaaen-Hanna, Development Services Specialist Contact E-mail Link: Map that Lets You Explore and Export Address Data Data Source: The initial dataset was created by combining several datasets and then reviewing the information to remove duplicates and identify errors. This published dataset is the system of record for Tempe addresses going forward, with the address information being created and maintained by The Building Safety Division of Community Development.Data Source Type: ESRI ArcGIS Enterprise GeodatabasePreparation Method: N/APublish Frequency: WeeklyPublish Method: AutomaticData Dictionary
This web map features a vector basemap of OpenStreetMap (OSM) data created and hosted by Esri. Esri produced this vector tile basemap in ArcGIS Pro from a live replica of OSM data, hosted by Esri, and rendered using a creative cartographic style emulating a blueprint technical drawing. The vector tiles are updated every few weeks with the latest OSM data. This vector basemap is freely available for any user or developer to build into their web map or web mapping apps.OpenStreetMap (OSM) is an open collaborative project to create a free editable map of the world. Volunteers gather location data using GPS, local knowledge, and other free sources of information and upload it. The resulting free map can be viewed and downloaded from the OpenStreetMap site: www.OpenStreetMap.org. Esri is a supporter of the OSM project and is excited to make this new vector basemap available available to the OSM, GIS, and Developer communities.
Description of columns in the ArcGIS point file "Points for Maps" which provides the final statistics used to make the maps of mean daily water levels and maps of the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of daily water levels during 2000–2009 in Miami-Dade County; and maps showing the differences in the statistics of water levels between 1990–1999 and 2000–2009.
These are the cadastral reference features that provide the basis and framework for parcel mapping and for other mapping. This feature data set contains PLSS and Other Survey System data. The other survey systems include subdivision plats and those types of survey reference systems. This feature data set also include feature classes to support the special conditions in Ohio. This data set represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular surveys. The primary source for the data is cadastral survey records housed by the BLM supplemented with local records and geographic control coordinates from states, counties as well as other federal agencies such as the USGS and USFS. The data has been converted from source documents to digital form and transferred into a GIS format that is compliant with FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standards and Guidelines for publication. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific "production" or operation and maintenance. This data set includes the following: PLSS Fully Intersected (all of the PLSS feature at the atomic or smallest polygon level), PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys) PLSS Special surveys (non rectangular components of the PLSS) Meandered Water, Corners and Conflicted Areas (known areas of gaps or overlaps between Townships or state boundaries). The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail.
In 2007, the California Ocean Protection Council initiated the California Seafloor Mapping Program (CSMP), designed to create a comprehensive seafloor map of high-resolution bathymetry, marine benthic habitats, and geology within California’s State Waters. The program supports a large number of coastal-zone- and ocean-management issues, including the California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) (California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2008), which requires information about the distribution of ecosystems as part of the design and proposal process for the establishment of Marine Protected Areas. A focus of CSMP is to map California’s State Waters with consistent methods at a consistent scale. The CSMP approach is to create highly detailed seafloor maps through collection, integration, interpretation, and visualization of swath sonar data (the undersea equivalent of satellite remote-sensing data in terrestrial mapping), acoustic backscatter, seafloor video, seafloor photography, high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles, and bottom-sediment sampling data. The map products display seafloor morphology and character, identify potential marine benthic habitats, and illustrate both the surficial seafloor geology and shallow (to about 100 m) subsurface geology. It is emphasized that the more interpretive habitat and geology data rely on the integration of multiple, new high-resolution datasets and that mapping at small scales would not be possible without such data. This approach and CSMP planning is based in part on recommendations of the Marine Mapping Planning Workshop (Kvitek and others, 2006), attended by coastal and marine managers and scientists from around the state. That workshop established geographic priorities for a coastal mapping project and identified the need for coverage of “lands” from the shore strand line (defined as Mean Higher High Water; MHHW) out to the 3-nautical-mile (5.6-km) limit of California’s State Waters. Unfortunately, surveying the zone from MHHW out to 10-m water depth is not consistently possible using ship-based surveying methods, owing to sea state (for example, waves, wind, or currents), kelp coverage, and shallow rock outcrops. Accordingly, some of the data presented in this series commonly do not cover the zone from the shore out to 10-m depth. This data is part of a series of online U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications, each of which includes several map sheets, some explanatory text, and a descriptive pamphlet. Each map sheet is published as a PDF file. Geographic information system (GIS) files that contain both ESRI ArcGIS raster grids (for example, bathymetry, seafloor character) and geotiffs (for example, shaded relief) are also included for each publication. For those who do not own the full suite of ESRI GIS and mapping software, the data can be read using ESRI ArcReader, a free viewer that is available at http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcreader/index.html (last accessed September 20, 2013). The California Seafloor Mapping Program is a collaborative venture between numerous different federal and state agencies, academia, and the private sector. CSMP partners include the California Coastal Conservancy, the California Ocean Protection Council, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the California Geological Survey, California State University at Monterey Bay’s Seafloor Mapping Lab, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Center for Habitat Studies, Fugro Pelagos, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, including National Ocean Service–Office of Coast Surveys, National Marine Sanctuaries, and National Marine Fisheries Service), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Geological Survey. These web services for the Point Sur to Point Arguello map area includes data layers that are associated to GIS and map sheets available from the USGS CSMP web page at https://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/mapping/csmp/index.html. Each published CSMP map area includes a data catalog of geographic information system (GIS) files; map sheets that contain explanatory text; and an associated descriptive pamphlet. This web service represents the available data layers for this map area. Data was combined from different sonar surveys to generate a comprehensive high-resolution bathymetry and acoustic-backscatter coverage of the map area. These data reveal a range of physiographic including exposed bedrock outcrops, large fields of sand waves, as well as many human impacts on the seafloor. To validate geological and biological interpretations of the sonar data, the U.S. Geological Survey towed a camera sled over specific offshore locations, collecting both video and photographic imagery; these “ground-truth” surveying data are available from the CSMP Video and Photograph Portal at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7J1015K. The “seafloor character” data layer shows classifications of the seafloor on the basis of depth, slope, rugosity (ruggedness), and backscatter intensity and which is further informed by the ground-truth-survey imagery. The “potential habitats” polygons are delineated on the basis of substrate type, geomorphology, seafloor process, or other attributes that may provide a habitat for a specific species or assemblage of organisms. Representative seismic-reflection profile data from the map area is also include and provides information on the subsurface stratigraphy and structure of the map area. The distribution and thickness of young sediment (deposited over the past about 21,000 years, during the most recent sea-level rise) is interpreted on the basis of the seismic-reflection data. The geologic polygons merge onshore geologic mapping (compiled from existing maps by the California Geological Survey) and new offshore geologic mapping that is based on integration of high-resolution bathymetry and backscatter imagery seafloor-sediment and rock samplesdigital camera and video imagery, and high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles. The information provided by the map sheets, pamphlet, and data catalog has a broad range of applications. High-resolution bathymetry, acoustic backscatter, ground-truth-surveying imagery, and habitat mapping all contribute to habitat characterization and ecosystem-based management by providing essential data for delineation of marine protected areas and ecosystem restoration. Many of the maps provide high-resolution baselines that will be critical for monitoring environmental change associated with climate change, coastal development, or other forcings. High-resolution bathymetry is a critical component for modeling coastal flooding caused by storms and tsunamis, as well as inundation associated with longer term sea-level rise. Seismic-reflection and bathymetric data help characterize earthquake and tsunami sources, critical for natural-hazard assessments of coastal zones. Information on sediment distribution and thickness is essential to the understanding of local and regional sediment transport, as well as the development of regional sediment-management plans. In addition, siting of any new offshore infrastructure (for example, pipelines, cables, or renewable-energy facilities) will depend on high-resolution mapping. Finally, this mapping will both stimulate and enable new scientific research and also raise public awareness of, and education about, coastal environments and issues. Web services were created using an ArcGIS service definition file. The ArcGIS REST service and OGC WMS service include all Point Sur to Point Arguello map area data layers. Data layers are symbolized as shown on the associated map sheets.
Click here to access the data directly from the Illinois State Geospatial Data Clearinghouse. These lidar data are processed Classified LAS 1.4 files, formatted to 2,117 individual 2500 ft x 2500 ft tiles; used to create Reflectance Images, 3D breaklines and hydro-flattened DEMs as necessary. Geographic Extent: Lake county, Illinois covering approximately 466 square miles. Dataset Description: WI Kenosha-Racine Counties and IL 4 County QL1 Lidar project called for the Planning, Acquisition, processing and derivative products of lidar data to be collected at a derived nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 1 point every 0.35 meters. Project specifications are based on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Base Lidar Specification, Version 1.2. The data was developed based on a horizontal projection/datum of NAD83 (2011), State Plane, U.S Survey Feet and vertical datum of NAVD88 (GEOID12B), U.S. Survey Feet. Lidar data was delivered as processed Classified LAS 1.4 files, formatted to 2,117 individual 2500 ft x 2500 ft tiles, as tiled Reflectance Imagery, and as tiled bare earth DEMs; all tiled to the same 2500 ft x 2500 ft schema. Ground Conditions: Lidar was collected April-May 2017, while no snow was on the ground and rivers were at or below normal levels. In order to post process the lidar data to meet task order specifications and meet ASPRS vertical accuracy guidelines, Ayers established a total of 66 ground control points that were used to calibrate the lidar to known ground locations established throughout the WI Kenosha-Racine Counties and IL 4 County QL1 project area. An additional 195 independent accuracy checkpoints, 116 in Bare Earth and Urban landcovers (116 NVA points), 79 in Tall Grass and Brushland/Low Trees categories (79 VVA points), were used to assess the vertical accuracy of the data. These checkpoints were not used to calibrate or post process the data. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this dataset was collected and that some parts of these data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Users should not use these data for critical applications without a full awareness of its limitations. Acknowledgement of the U.S. Geological Survey would be appreciated for products derived from these data. These LAS data files include all data points collected. No points have been removed or excluded. A visual qualitative assessment was performed to ensure data completeness. No void areas or missing data exist. The raw point cloud is of good quality and data passes Non-Vegetated Vertical Accuracy specifications.Link Source: Illinois Geospatial Data Clearinghouse
Seattle Parks and Recreation ARCGIS park feature map layer web services are hosted on Seattle Public Utilities' ARCGIS server. This web services URL provides a live read only data connection to the Seattle Parks and Recreations View Points dataset.
Parcels and property data maintained and provided by Lee County Property Appraiser are converted to points. Property attribute data joined to parcel GIS layer by Lee County Government GIS. This dataset is generally used in spatial analysis.Process description: Parcel polygons, condominium points and property data provided by the Lee County Property Appraiser are processed by Lee County's GIS Department using the following steps:Join property data to parcel polygons Join property data to condo pointsConvert parcel polygons to points using ESRI's ArcGIS tool "Feature to Point" and designate the "Source" field "P".Load Condominium points into this layer and designate the "Source" field "C". Add X/Y coordinates in Florida State Plane West, NAD 83, feet using the "Add X/Y" tool.Projected coordinate system name: NAD_1983_StatePlane_Florida_West_FIPS_0902_FeetGeographic coordinate system name: GCS_North_American_1983
Name
Type
Length
Description
STRAP
String
25
17-digit Property ID (Section, Township, Range, Area, Block, Lot)
BLOCK
String
10
5-digit portion of STRAP (positions 9-13)
LOT
String
8
Last 4-digits of STRAP
FOLIOID
Double
8
Unique Property ID
MAINTDATE
Date
8
Date LeePA staff updated record
MAINTWHO
String
20
LeePA staff who updated record
UPDATED
Date
8
Data compilation date
HIDE_STRAP
String
1
Confidential parcel ownership
TRSPARCEL
String
17
Parcel ID sorted by Township, Range & Section
DORCODE
String
2
Department of Revenue. See https://leepa.org/Docs/Codes/DOR_Code_List.pdf
CONDOTYPE
String
1
Type of condominium: C (commercial) or R (residential)
UNITOFMEAS
String
2
Type of Unit of Measure (ex: AC=acre, LT=lot, FF=frontage in feet)
NUMUNITS
Double
8
Number of Land Units (units defined in UNITOFMEAS)
FRONTAGE
Integer
4
Road Frontage in Feet
DEPTH
Integer
4
Property Depth in Feet
GISACRES
Double
8
Total Computed Acres from GIS
TAXINGDIST
String
3
Taxing District of Property
TAXDISTDES
String
60
Taxing District Description
FIREDIST
String
3
Fire District of Property
FIREDISTDE
String
60
Fire District Description
ZONING
String
10
Zoning of Property
ZONINGAREA
String
3
Governing Area for Zoning
LANDUSECOD
SmallInteger
2
Land Use Code
LANDUSEDES
String
60
Land Use Description
LANDISON
String
5
BAY,CANAL,CREEK,GULF,LAKE,RIVER & GOLF
SITEADDR
String
55
Lee County Addressing/E911
SITENUMBER
String
10
Property Location - Street Number
SITESTREET
String
40
Street Name
SITEUNIT
String
5
Unit Number
SITECITY
String
20
City
SITEZIP
String
5
Zip Code
JUST
Double
8
Market Value
ASSESSED
Double
8
Building Value + Land Value
TAXABLE
Double
8
Taxable Value
LAND
Double
8
Land Value
BUILDING
Double
8
Building Value
LXFV
Double
8
Land Extra Feature Value
BXFV
Double
8
Building Extra Feature value
NEWBUILT
Double
8
New Construction Value
AGAMOUNT
Double
8
Agriculture Exemption Value
DISAMOUNT
Double
8
Disability Exemption Value
HISTAMOUNT
Double
8
Historical Exemption Value
HSTDAMOUNT
Double
8
Homestead Exemption Value
SNRAMOUNT
Double
8
Senior Exemption Value
WHLYAMOUNT
Double
8
Wholly Exemption Value
WIDAMOUNT
Double
8
Widow Exemption Value
WIDRAMOUNT
Double
8
Widower Exemption Value
BLDGCOUNT
SmallInteger
2
Total Number of Buildings on Parcel
MINBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Oldest Building Built
MAXBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Newest Building Built
TOTALAREA
Double
8
Total Building Area
HEATEDAREA
Double
8
Total Heated Area
MAXSTORIES
Double
8
Tallest Building on Parcel
BEDROOMS
Integer
4
Total Number of Bedrooms
BATHROOMS
Double
8
Total Number of Bathrooms / Not For Comm
GARAGE
String
1
Garage on Property 'Y'
CARPORT
String
1
Carport on Property 'Y'
POOL
String
1
Pool on Property 'Y'
BOATDOCK
String
1
Boat Dock on Property 'Y'
SEAWALL
String
1
Sea Wall on Property 'Y'
NBLDGCOUNT
SmallInteger
2
Total Number of New Buildings on ParcelTotal Number of New Buildings on Parcel
NMINBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Oldest New Building Built
NMAXBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Newest New Building Built
NTOTALAREA
Double
8
Total New Building Area
NHEATEDARE
Double
8
Total New Heated Area
NMAXSTORIE
Double
8
Tallest New Building on Parcel
NBEDROOMS
Integer
4
Total Number of New Bedrooms
NBATHROOMS
Double
8
Total Number of New Bathrooms/Not For Comm
NGARAGE
String
1
New Garage on Property 'Y'
NCARPORT
String
1
New Carport on Property 'Y'
NPOOL
String
1
New Pool on Property 'Y'
NBOATDOCK
String
1
New Boat Dock on Property 'Y'
NSEAWALL
String
1
New Sea Wall on Property 'Y'
O_NAME
String
30
Owner Name
O_OTHERS
String
120
Other Owners
O_CAREOF
String
30
In Care Of Line
O_ADDR1
String
30
Owner Mailing Address Line 1
O_ADDR2
String
30
Owner Mailing Address Line 2
O_CITY
String
30
Owner Mailing City
O_STATE
String
2
Owner Mailing State
O_ZIP
String
9
Owner Mailing Zip
O_COUNTRY
String
30
Owner Mailing Country
S_1DATE
Date
8
Most Current Sale Date > $100.00
S_1AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_1VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_1TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_1TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_1OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_2DATE
Date
8
Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_2AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_2VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_2TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_2TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_2OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_3DATE
Date
8
Next Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_3AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_3VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_3TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_3TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_3OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_4DATE
Date
8
Next Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_4AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_4VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_4TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_4TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_4OR_NUM
String
13
Data updated daily.
Address points mark the location of each addressable structure and its access point. The access point is the place where a driveway intersects the road. The building point is where the structure is located. An addressable structure is one where people live, work, or gather. A 1 to 5-digit number designates an address. Purpose: The access point is used to assign an address to the structure. Addresses are also assigned to assist in the provision of emergency services; they can be queried at all Fire and Rescue stations and by E-911 dispatchers. Supplemental Information: Data are stored in the corporate ArcSDE Geodatabase as a feature class. The coordinate system is Virginia State Plane (North), Zone 4501, datum NAD83 HARN. Maintenance and Update Frequency: Daily Completeness Report: Features may have been eliminated or generalized due to scale and intended use. To assist Loudoun County, Virginia in the maintenance of the data, please provide any information concerning discovered errors, omissions, or other discrepancies found in the data.
Data Owner: Office of Mapping and Geographic Information
The address points dataset is a based on information provided by local area municipalities within the Regional Municipality of York. Addresses may represent properties, individual buildings, and/or additional structures such as bus stops. The parcel fabric, Regional road network, and orthophotography may be used to help create the data. This data covers the entire Region of York and is updated on an ongoing basis.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The FireOccurrence point layer represents ignition points, or points of origin, from which individual USFS wildland fires started. Data are maintained at the Forest/District level, or their equivalent, to track the occurrence and the origin of individual USFS wildland fires. Forests are working to include historical data, which may be incomplete.National USFS fire occurrence locations where wildland fires have historically occurred on National Forest System Lands and/or where protection is the responsibility of the US Forest Service. Knowing where wildland fire events have happened in the past is critical to land management efforts in the future.This data is utilized by fire & aviation staffs, land managers, land planners, and resource specialists on and around National Forest System Lands. The attributes included within the FireOccurrence point layer are needed to meet the needs of the US Forest Service, for data exchange between interagency data systems, to relate to the FirePerimeter polygon data layer and various fire data systems, and to track the locations of wildland fires.*This data has been updated to match 2021 National GIS Data Dictionary Standards.Metadata and DownloadsThis record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService CSV Shapefile GeoJSON KML For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.
Seattle Parks and Recreation ARCGIS park feature map layer web services are hosted on Seattle Public Utilities' ARCGIS server. This web services URL provides a live read only data connection to the Seattle Parks and Recreations Basketball Court Point dataset.
Seattle Parks and Recreation ARCGIS park feature map layer web services are hosted on Seattle Public Utilities' ARCGIS server. This web services URL provides a live read only data connection to the Seattle Parks and Recreations Bocca Ball Point dataset.
U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
Seattle Parks and Recreation ARCGIS park feature map layer web services are hosted on Seattle Public Utilities' ARCGIS server. This web services URL provides a live read only data connection to the Seattle Parks and Recreations Soccer Field Point dataset.
This dataset contains address points for addresses in Cook County. An ESRI Service is available at: https://hub-cookcountyil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/5ec856ded93e4f85b3f6e1bc027a2472_0/ Data is updated and maintained by Cook County GIS.
The way to access Layers Quickly.
Quick Layers is an Add-In for ArcMap 10.6+ that allows rapid access to the DNR's Geospatial Data Resource Site (GDRS). The GDRS is a data structure that serves core geospatial dataset and applications for not only DNR, but many state agencies, and supports the Minnesota Geospatial Commons. Data added from Quick Layers is pre-symbolized, helping to standardize visualization and map production. Current version: 1.164
To use Quick Layers with the GDRS, there's no need to download QuickLayers from this location. Instead, download a full copy or a custom subset of the public GDRS (including Quick Layers) using GDRS Manager.
Quick Layers also allows users to save and share their own pre-symbolized layers, thus increasing efficiency and consistency across the enterprise.
Installation:
After using GDRS Manager to create a GDRS, including Quick Layers, add the path to the Quick Layers addin to the list of shared folders:
1. Open ArcMap
2. Customize -> Add-In Manager… -> Options
3. Click add folder, and enter the location of the Quick Layers app. For example, if your GDRS is mapped to the V drive, the path would be V:\gdrs\apps\pub\us_mn_state_dnr\quick_layers
4. After you do this, the Quick Layers toolbar will be available. To add it, go to Customize -> Toolbars and select DNR Quick Layers 10
The link below is only for those who are using Quick Layers without a GDRS. To get the most functionality out of Quick Layers, don't install it separately, but instead download it as part of a GDRS build using GDRS Manager.
Seattle Parks and Recreation ARCGIS park feature map layer web services are hosted on Seattle Public Utilities' ARCGIS server. This web services URL provides a live read only data connection to the Seattle Parks and Recreations Lawn Bowling Point dataset.
Statistical analyses and maps representing mean, high, and low water-level conditions in the surface water and groundwater of Miami-Dade County were made by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, to help inform decisions necessary for urban planning and development. Sixteen maps were created that show contours of (1) the mean of daily water levels at each site during October and May for the 2000-2009 water years; (2) the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the daily water levels at each site during October and May and for all months during 2000-2009; and (3) the differences between mean October and May water levels, as well as the differences in the percentiles of water levels for all months, between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009. The 80th, 90th, and 96th percentiles of the annual maximums of daily groundwater levels during 1974-2009 (a 35-year period) were computed to provide an indication of unusually high groundwater-level conditions. These maps and statistics provide a generalized understanding of the variations of water levels in the aquifer, rather than a survey of concurrent water levels. Water-level measurements from 473 sites in Miami-Dade County and surrounding counties were analyzed to generate statistical analyses. The monitored water levels included surface-water levels in canals and wetland areas and groundwater levels in the Biscayne aquifer. Maps were created by importing site coordinates, summary water-level statistics, and completeness of record statistics into a geographic information system, and by interpolating between water levels at monitoring sites in the canals and water levels along the coastline. Raster surfaces were created from these data by using the triangular irregular network interpolation method. The raster surfaces were contoured by using geographic information system software. These contours were imprecise in some areas because the software could not fully evaluate the hydrology given available information; therefore, contours were manually modified where necessary. The ability to evaluate differences in water levels between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 is limited in some areas because most of the monitoring sites did not have 80 percent complete records for one or both of these periods. The quality of the analyses was limited by (1) deficiencies in spatial coverage; (2) the combination of pre- and post-construction water levels in areas where canals, levees, retention basins, detention basins, or water-control structures were installed or removed; (3) an inability to address the potential effects of the vertical hydraulic head gradient on water levels in wells of different depths; and (4) an inability to correct for the differences between daily water-level statistics. Contours are dashed in areas where the locations of contours have been approximated because of the uncertainty caused by these limitations. Although the ability of the maps to depict differences in water levels between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 was limited by missing data, results indicate that near the coast water levels were generally higher in May during 2000-2009 than during 1990-1999; and that inland water levels were generally lower during 2000-2009 than during 1990-1999. Generally, the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of water levels from all months were also higher near the coast and lower inland during 2000–2009 than during 1990-1999. Mean October water levels during 2000-2009 were generally higher than during 1990-1999 in much of western Miami-Dade County, but were lower in a large part of eastern Miami-Dade County.